This page contains Windows bias

About This Page

This page is part of the Azure documentation. It contains code examples and configuration instructions for working with Azure services.

Bias Analysis

Bias Types:
⚠️ windows_tools
⚠️ windows_first
Summary:
The documentation provides a balanced overview of features for both Windows (SMB/Active Directory) and Linux (NFS/LDAP) environments. However, there is a subtle Windows bias in some areas: Windows/SMB/Active Directory features and terminology (e.g., Windows File Explorer, NTFS, Windows client, FSLogix, Citrix, Azure VMware Solution) are sometimes mentioned first or in more detail, and Windows-centric tools and workflows (e.g., SMB Continuous Availability, Access-based Enumeration, non-browsable shares) are described with explicit references to Windows clients. Linux/NFS features are present and described, but Windows/SMB scenarios are often foregrounded, especially in features related to user access, security, and integration with enterprise environments.
Recommendations:
  • When describing features that apply to both SMB (Windows) and NFS (Linux), ensure that Linux/NFS examples, terminology, and client perspectives are presented with equal prominence and detail.
  • Where Windows tools or workflows (e.g., Windows File Explorer, NTFS, FSLogix) are mentioned, provide equivalent Linux tools or workflows (e.g., Linux file managers, POSIX permissions, Linux VDI solutions) and describe their usage.
  • Avoid phrases like 'the Windows client hides the folder...' without also mentioning the behavior on Linux/NFS clients, or clarify if the feature is Windows-only.
  • For features like Access-based Enumeration and non-browsable shares, explicitly state their applicability (or lack thereof) to NFS/Linux clients, and provide Linux/NFS-specific guidance where possible.
  • Review the order of protocol mentions (e.g., 'SMB, NFSv4.1, and dual-protocol') and alternate the order or use 'NFS/SMB' where appropriate to avoid always foregrounding Windows/SMB.
  • Where integration with enterprise identity solutions is discussed, ensure parity in coverage between Active Directory (Windows) and LDAP/Unix identity management solutions.
GitHub Create pull request

Scan History

Date Scan ID Status Bias Status
2025-09-16 00:00 #113 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-15 00:00 #112 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-14 00:00 #111 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-13 00:00 #110 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-12 00:00 #109 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-11 00:00 #108 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-10 00:00 #107 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-09 00:00 #106 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-08 00:00 #105 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-07 00:00 #104 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-06 00:00 #103 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-05 00:00 #102 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-04 00:00 #101 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-03 00:00 #100 completed ✅ Clean
2025-09-02 00:00 #99 in_progress ✅ Clean
2025-09-01 00:00 #98 in_progress ✅ Clean
2025-08-29 00:01 #95 completed ✅ Clean
2025-08-28 00:01 #94 in_progress ✅ Clean
2025-08-27 00:01 #93 in_progress ✅ Clean
2025-08-26 00:00 #92 in_progress ✅ Clean
2025-08-25 00:01 #91 in_progress ❌ Biased
2025-08-24 00:00 #90 in_progress ❌ Biased
2025-08-22 00:01 #88 completed ❌ Biased
2025-08-21 00:01 #87 in_progress ❌ Biased
2025-08-20 00:01 #86 completed ❌ Biased
2025-08-19 00:01 #85 completed ✅ Clean
2025-08-18 00:00 #84 in_progress ✅ Clean
2025-08-17 00:01 #83 in_progress ✅ Clean
2025-08-11 00:00 #77 completed ❌ Biased
2025-08-10 00:00 #76 completed ✅ Clean
2025-08-09 00:00 #75 completed ✅ Clean
2025-08-08 00:00 #74 completed ✅ Clean
2025-07-13 21:37 #48 completed ✅ Clean
2025-07-09 13:09 #3 cancelled ✅ Clean
2025-07-08 04:23 #2 cancelled ❌ Biased