Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
windows_tools
powershell_heavy
missing_linux_example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., Windows Server Failover Cluster, UNC paths, SMB protocol) are described in detail, often before or with more depth than their Linux equivalents. Windows deployment and high-availability solutions are presented first, and the use of Windows-centric terminology (such as WSFC and shared disks) is prominent. Linux alternatives (e.g., Pacemaker, NFS/NetApp Files) are mentioned but with less explanation and fewer practical examples. Some backup/restore examples are Windows-specific (UNC path), with no Linux path examples provided.
Recommendations
- Ensure Linux deployment and high-availability sections are as detailed as Windows sections, including step-by-step examples and practical guidance.
- Provide Linux-specific backup/restore examples, such as using NFS paths or typical Linux file system paths.
- Mention Linux tools (e.g., Pacemaker, Corosync) with equal prominence and detail as Windows Server Failover Cluster.
- Present Windows and Linux options side-by-side in tables and explanations, rather than listing Windows first.
- Include troubleshooting and automation examples for Linux environments, similar to those provided for Windows.
- Clarify any OS-specific limitations or features in a neutral, comparative manner.
Create Pull Request