Document Details

The documentation presents recommendations for both Linux and Windows images, but there is evidence of Windows bias. Some security checks under the 'Linux and open source OS images' section reference Windows Server roles and features, which are not applicable to Linux. Windows-specific tools like BitLocker are mentioned for Windows images, while Linux equivalents (e.g., dm-crypt/LUKS) are not referenced. Additionally, certain recommendations (e.g., auto-update for security patches) are detailed for Windows but lack Linux-specific guidance or examples. The order of presentation sometimes places Windows concepts before Linux ones, and some Linux recommendations are less detailed or lack parity with Windows examples.