Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
windows_tools
windows_examples
windows-centric_field_values
Summary
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias in several areas: Windows domain and hostname formats are mentioned first and in detail, field examples and value types (such as process names, hostnames, and domain types) use Windows-centric formats, and Windows-specific terminology (e.g., 'Primary Domain Controller', 'Contoso\DESKTOP-1282V4D', 'Windows' domain type) is prevalent. Linux equivalents or examples (e.g., Linux process paths, Linux host/domain formats) are missing or only referenced generically. The documentation does mention Linux in passing (e.g., process ID types), but does not provide parity in examples, terminology, or guidance.
Recommendations
- Add Linux-specific examples for fields such as SrcProcessName (e.g., '/usr/bin/sshd'), SrcHostname (e.g., 'webserver01'), and domain types (e.g., FQDNs typical in Linux environments).
- When listing possible values for fields like SrcDomainType and DstDomainType, mention FQDN first or equally with Windows domain formats.
- Provide process ID conversion examples for Linux (e.g., handling hexadecimal PIDs from Linux audit logs).
- Include Linux-specific device types and terminology in field descriptions and examples (e.g., reference 'systemd', 'init', or Linux service names).
- Ensure that documentation for custom parsers and normalization includes Linux-based DNS servers (e.g., BIND, Unbound) and their logging patterns.
- Balance references to Windows tools and concepts with Linux equivalents throughout the schema and usage notes.
Create Pull Request