Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
windows_tools
powershell_heavy
missing_linux_example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Many queries and examples are generic to Azure Resource Graph and do not differentiate between Windows and Linux, but where OS-specific examples are given, Windows Server is typically presented first and in more detail. Windows terminology (e.g., KB IDs, update classifications like 'updateRollup', 'featurePack', 'servicePack') is prevalent, and PowerShell is featured as a primary automation tool. Linux-specific queries are present but less emphasized and sometimes appear after Windows equivalents. There is little discussion of Linux-specific update types or tools, and no mention of Linux command-line alternatives (e.g., Bash scripts) for automation.
Recommendations
- Ensure Linux-specific queries and examples are presented with equal prominence and detail as Windows examples.
- Where update classifications or terminology are Windows-centric, provide Linux equivalents or clarify differences.
- Include Linux command-line automation examples (e.g., Bash, shell scripts) alongside PowerShell for parity.
- When listing OS-specific queries, alternate the order or group them together to avoid always presenting Windows first.
- Expand documentation to discuss Linux patching tools and patterns (e.g., apt, yum, zypper) where relevant.
- Clarify in each query or example which OSes are supported and highlight any differences in output or behavior.
Create Pull Request