Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
windows_tools
windows_examples
missing_linux_example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias through the use of Windows-centric examples (e.g., file paths like 'C:\Windows\explorer.exe', 'C:\Windows\System32\rundll32.exe'), references to Windows-specific concepts (such as integrity levels and User Access Control), and links to Windows documentation. Linux equivalents (e.g., Linux file paths, process integrity concepts, or privilege elevation mechanisms) are not provided, and examples or explanations for Linux systems are missing. The documentation also references Windows-specific tools and patterns before mentioning Linux, if at all.
Recommendations
- Include Linux-specific examples alongside Windows examples, such as process names ('/usr/bin/bash'), file paths ('/usr/bin/sshd'), and command lines.
- Document Linux equivalents for concepts like process integrity levels and privilege elevation (e.g., SELinux contexts, capabilities, sudo usage).
- Reference Linux documentation (e.g., man pages, kernel docs) where appropriate, in addition to Windows documentation.
- Clarify which fields or concepts are OS-specific and provide guidance for both Windows and Linux implementations.
- Ensure that examples and field descriptions alternate or balance between Windows and Linux, rather than defaulting to Windows first.
- Add notes or tables comparing how process events are reported and normalized across Windows and Linux systems.
Create Pull Request