Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
windows_tools
missing_linux_example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows workloads, tools, and technologies (Active Directory, Exchange, SQL Server, SharePoint, IIS, Dynamics AX, RDS) in both the workload summary and detailed protection sections. Windows-centric applications are described in detail, with integration patterns and examples, while Linux workloads are only briefly mentioned in summary tables and lack equivalent application-specific guidance or examples. Windows tools and patterns (e.g., SQL Always On, Exchange DAGs, IIS, RDS) are discussed extensively, whereas Linux equivalents (such as clustering, HA, or application-specific DR strategies) are not covered.
Recommendations
- Add detailed sections for popular Linux workloads (e.g., Apache, NGINX, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Samba, LDAP) with disaster recovery patterns and integration examples.
- Provide parity in application-specific guidance for Linux, including how to use Site Recovery with Linux HA/DR technologies (e.g., Pacemaker, Corosync, DRBD, Linux clustering).
- Include Linux-first or Linux-specific examples and scripts for recovery plans, failover, and failback.
- Mention open-source alternatives to Windows tools (e.g., for DNS, directory services, web servers) and describe how Site Recovery supports these.
- Ensure that Linux workloads are not relegated to summary tables but receive equal narrative detail and step-by-step instructions.
Create Pull Request