Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
windows_tools
missing_linux_example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias. Several categories (ActiveX, Exploit, Web Server) mention Microsoft/Windows technologies (ActiveX, Windows exploits, IIS) explicitly, while Linux equivalents (e.g., Linux-specific exploits, Apache, NGINX) are mentioned but not given equal prominence or detail. There are no code examples, but the pattern of listing Windows technologies first or exclusively is present. No Linux-specific tools or attack vectors are highlighted, and Linux is not referenced in the context of exploits or vulnerabilities except as part of a list. There are no PowerShell examples, but the overall framing is more Windows-centric.
Recommendations
- Ensure Linux technologies (e.g., Linux kernel exploits, Samba, Linux-specific vulnerabilities) are mentioned with equal detail and prominence as Windows equivalents.
- When listing categories or examples, alternate or balance the order between Windows and Linux technologies to avoid 'Windows first' bias.
- Add explicit references to Linux attack vectors and tools where relevant (e.g., mention Linux-specific web servers, desktop environments, or protocols).
- Include examples or notes for both Windows and Linux environments when discussing exploits, vulnerabilities, or detection logic.
- Review and update category descriptions to ensure parity in coverage of both Windows and Linux platforms.
Create Pull Request