Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
windows_tools
windows_heavy
Summary
The documentation lists a wide array of ASIM parsers for both Windows and Linux sources, but Windows-centric tools, event types, and connectors (such as Windows Events, Sysmon for Windows, Windows Security Events, and Microsoft Defender XDR) are consistently mentioned before or more prominently than their Linux equivalents. Windows-specific event IDs and connectors are described in detail, while Linux sources are fewer and often grouped or described more generically (e.g., 'reported using Syslog'). There are more parser types and examples for Windows than for Linux, and Windows event collection methods (Azure Monitor Agent, Log Analytics Agent) are referenced frequently, with less detail on Linux ingestion patterns.
Recommendations
- Ensure Linux parsers are described with equal detail, including specific event IDs, log sources, and collection methods (e.g., auditd, journald, rsyslog, etc.).
- Add more Linux-specific examples and expand coverage to include common Linux tools and patterns (such as audit logs, systemd journal, and other security-relevant sources).
- Where Windows and Linux equivalents exist, present them side-by-side or in parallel sections to avoid implicit prioritization.
- Clarify ingestion and normalization steps for Linux sources, matching the specificity given to Windows connectors.
- Consider adding tables or lists that explicitly compare Windows and Linux event types, connectors, and parser coverage for transparency.
Create Pull Request