Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
windows_tools
missing_linux_example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure Site Recovery demonstrates mild Windows bias. Windows-specific technologies (e.g., Windows Server Failover Clusters, SQL Server Always On, AWS Windows instances) are mentioned explicitly, while Linux equivalents are not. Windows workloads and features are often listed first, and there is a lack of concrete Linux-focused examples or references to Linux-specific disaster recovery scenarios or tooling. Although Linux is mentioned as supported, details and examples are sparse compared to Windows.
Recommendations
- Add explicit examples and references for Linux disaster recovery scenarios, such as protecting Linux clusters or common Linux workloads (e.g., Apache, MySQL, PostgreSQL).
- Include Linux-specific tooling and patterns where applicable, such as integration with Linux-native automation or backup solutions.
- Balance the mention of Windows and Linux technologies/features, ensuring Linux is not only listed as 'supported' but also described in detail.
- Provide parity in documentation for advanced features (e.g., shared disk, application-consistent snapshots) for Linux workloads if supported, or clarify limitations.
Create Pull Request