Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
powershell_heavy
Summary
The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for most commands, but in several key sections, the PowerShell workflow is more detailed and prominent. For example, the deployment of the frontend application is described in a much more elaborate way for PowerShell users, including the use of template objects and multiple steps, whereas the Bash workflow is a single command. Additionally, in some sections, PowerShell appears before Bash, and the PowerShell workflow uses Azure PowerShell cmdlets (e.g., New-AzContainerApp) rather than Azure CLI, which is more cross-platform. There are no missing Linux examples, but the PowerShell workflow is more verbose and detailed, potentially giving the impression of Windows preference.
Recommendations
- Ensure that both Bash and PowerShell workflows are equally detailed. For example, provide a step-by-step Bash alternative for the multi-step PowerShell deployment process, possibly using Azure CLI and environment variables.
- Where possible, use Azure CLI for both Bash and PowerShell examples to maintain cross-platform parity, as Azure CLI works identically on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
- Present Bash examples first, as Bash is the default shell on Linux and macOS, and is also available on Windows via WSL or Git Bash.
- If using PowerShell-specific cmdlets (e.g., New-AzContainerApp), provide equivalent Azure CLI commands for Bash users.
- Review the order and depth of examples to ensure Linux users are not disadvantaged or required to 'figure out' missing steps.
Create Pull Request