Bias Analysis
Detected Bias Types
windows_first
missing_linux_example
windows_tools
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. Many policy definitions and compliance controls specifically reference Windows machines, Windows extensions, or Windows-specific tools (such as the Microsoft IaaSAntimalware extension), often without providing equivalent Linux examples or alternatives. In sections where both Windows and Linux are relevant (e.g., guest configuration, privileged access, antivirus), Windows is frequently mentioned first or exclusively, with Linux-specific policies either omitted or only included in select areas. This creates an impression that Windows is the primary or default platform for compliance, while Linux support is secondary or incomplete.
Recommendations
- For every Windows-specific policy or example, provide a Linux equivalent where possible, or explicitly state if one does not exist.
- Ensure Linux guest configuration, extension deployment, and security controls are documented alongside Windows, not as an afterthought.
- Add Linux-focused antivirus and hardening policy examples, or clarify the current limitations for Linux support.
- Review the ordering of examples and policies to avoid always listing Windows first; consider alternating or grouping by OS.
- Where Windows tools or extensions are referenced (e.g., IaaSAntimalware), mention Linux-compatible alternatives or note the lack thereof.
- Include cross-platform guidance and highlight any differences in compliance implementation between Windows and Linux.
Create Pull Request