53
Total Pages
40
Linux-Friendly Pages
13
Pages with Bias
24.5%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues (27)

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation generally provides both Bash and PowerShell syntax for Azure CLI commands, but PowerShell examples are consistently presented immediately after Bash, and sometimes with explicit 'PowerShell syntax' labels. There are no Linux-specific tools or workflows mentioned, but the documentation does state that Azure CLI commands can be run in either PowerShell or Bash. No examples are exclusive to Windows or PowerShell, but the repeated explicit inclusion of PowerShell syntax and the order of presentation (Bash first, then PowerShell) may suggest a slight Windows-first or PowerShell-heavy bias.
Recommendations:
  • Ensure that all command examples are provided for both Bash and PowerShell, as currently done.
  • Consider alternating the order of Bash and PowerShell examples, or presenting them in parallel tabs, to avoid implying a default preference.
  • Explicitly mention Linux and macOS compatibility in the prerequisites and command sections, not just Bash.
  • Include screenshots or references to Linux/macOS environments where appropriate, not only Azure Portal (which is OS-agnostic but often associated with Windows workflows).
  • If any troubleshooting or environment setup steps differ for Linux/macOS, provide those details alongside Windows instructions.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and PowerShell examples for deploying the ARM template, but PowerShell is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and there is no mention of Linux-specific considerations or examples. The PowerShell example is presented alongside the CLI example, but there are no explicit Linux shell (bash) examples or notes about cross-platform usage, which may implicitly favor Windows users.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and consider providing bash-specific examples or notes where appropriate.
  • Clarify that PowerShell Core is cross-platform, but traditional Azure PowerShell is most commonly used on Windows.
  • Add a section or note for Linux/macOS users, highlighting any differences or confirming parity.
  • Ensure that CLI examples are presented first, as they are more universally applicable across platforms.
  • Avoid implying that PowerShell is the default or primary method unless it is truly cross-platform.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation mentions Azure PowerShell alongside Azure CLI as tools to list deployed resources, but lists Azure PowerShell after Azure CLI. However, there are no explicit command examples for either tool, and no Linux-specific tools or patterns are mentioned. The mention of Azure PowerShell may imply a Windows-centric approach, but the Azure CLI is cross-platform.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit command examples for both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, clarifying that Azure CLI is cross-platform and works on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Mention that Azure PowerShell is available on all platforms, not just Windows, to avoid the implication that it is Windows-only.
  • Consider including Linux-native tools or shell examples (such as Bash) where appropriate.
  • Ensure that any future examples or screenshots include both Windows and Linux environments to reinforce cross-platform parity.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively provides instructions using the Azure portal GUI, which is most commonly accessed and documented from a Windows environment. There are no command-line examples (such as Azure CLI or PowerShell), and no mention of Linux or cross-platform workflows. This can disadvantage users who prefer or require automation, scripting, or non-Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions using the Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • If relevant, provide PowerShell examples alongside CLI examples, but do not make them the only option.
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal can be accessed from any OS with a web browser, to clarify platform neutrality.
  • Include notes or links to documentation for automating these tasks in CI/CD pipelines, which often run on Linux.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for Azure CLI commands, but the PowerShell examples are labeled as 'Formatted for PowerShell' and are always presented after the Bash examples. There are no exclusive Windows tools or patterns, but the presence of PowerShell examples and their explicit labeling indicates a slight Windows bias. Linux (Bash) examples are present and shown first, but there is no explicit mention of Linux or macOS environments, nor troubleshooting or environment-specific notes for non-Windows users.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly label Bash examples as suitable for Linux/macOS and PowerShell for Windows.
  • Add a short note at the start of the CLI section explaining which shell to use on which platform.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting or environment-specific notes for both Linux and Windows users.
  • Consider including zsh or other popular Linux shell variants if relevant.
  • Where possible, avoid implying PowerShell is the default or preferred shell for CLI usage.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for Azure CLI commands, but the PowerShell (Windows) examples are given immediately after the Bash ones, and are explicitly labeled as 'Formatted for PowerShell.' There is no explicit mention of Linux or macOS environments, and the Bash examples are not clearly labeled as 'Linux/macOS.' The documentation does not provide parity in guidance or troubleshooting for Linux users, and the structure may imply a Windows-first approach.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly label Bash examples as 'Linux/macOS' and PowerShell examples as 'Windows' to clarify platform relevance.
  • Present Bash (Linux/macOS) examples before PowerShell (Windows) examples to avoid a Windows-first impression.
  • Add a brief note at the start of the CLI section explaining which example to use based on the user's operating system.
  • Ensure troubleshooting tips or environment-specific notes are included for both Windows and Linux/macOS users.
  • Consider providing a tabbed interface for Bash and PowerShell examples, so users can easily select their platform.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page exclusively references Visual Studio Code and its Azure API Center extension, both of which are cross-platform, but does not mention or provide examples for Linux-specific tools, editors, or workflows. There is no explicit mention of Linux or macOS environments, nor are alternative command-line or editor options discussed.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state that Visual Studio Code and the Azure API Center extension are available on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Include examples or notes for installing and using the extension on Linux (e.g., using apt, snap, or rpm for VS Code installation).
  • Mention alternative editors or CLI tools, if available, for users who may not use Visual Studio Code.
  • Provide links or references to Linux/macOS-specific setup guides, if they exist.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses the Azure portal (web UI) for configuration steps, which is platform-agnostic but often associated with Windows-centric workflows. There are no command-line examples (such as Azure CLI or PowerShell), but the absence of Linux-specific or cross-platform CLI instructions (e.g., bash scripts, az CLI commands) means Linux users do not see parity or guidance for non-GUI environments.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent step-by-step instructions using the Azure CLI (az) for enabling managed identities and assigning roles, which work across Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Include bash shell examples for secret management and role assignment.
  • Explicitly mention that the portal steps are platform-independent, but provide links or sections for CLI-based workflows.
  • Ensure that any future examples or scripts are provided in both PowerShell and bash where applicable.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for Azure CLI commands. However, the PowerShell examples are labeled as 'Formatted for PowerShell' and are given equal prominence to the Bash examples, despite Bash being the default shell on Linux and macOS. Additionally, variable assignment in PowerShell is shown even when the Bash example is already present, which may not be necessary. There is no explicit mention of Linux or macOS, and the documentation does not clarify that Bash examples are suitable for those platforms, potentially leading to a subtle Windows/PowerShell bias.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly indicate that Bash examples are intended for Linux/macOS and PowerShell examples are for Windows.
  • List Bash (Linux/macOS) examples first, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and Bash is the default on non-Windows systems.
  • Add a short note explaining which shell to use on each OS.
  • If both examples are provided, ensure parity in explanation and avoid implying PowerShell is the primary or default environment.
  • Consider adding a tabbed interface or clearer separation for Bash and PowerShell to avoid confusion.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation presents both Azure CLI and PowerShell examples for deploying the ARM template, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and is featured immediately after. There is no explicit mention of Linux or Bash shell usage, nor are there any Linux-specific considerations or examples. The documentation assumes parity between CLI and PowerShell, but the presence of PowerShell and lack of Linux/Bash examples may subtly bias toward Windows users.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS) and can be run in Bash or other shells.
  • Add a Bash-specific example or note for Linux/macOS users, clarifying any differences in file paths or environment setup.
  • If referencing PowerShell, clarify that PowerShell Core is available cross-platform, or provide a link to installation instructions for non-Windows systems.
  • Consider listing Azure CLI (which is cross-platform) before PowerShell, or making it the default example, to reduce Windows-first perception.
  • Add a short section or callout for Linux/macOS users to ensure inclusivity.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses Azure Portal, Logic Apps, and Microsoft Teams for workflow automation, all of which are Microsoft-centric tools. There are no examples or mentions of Linux-native tools, CLI-based automation, or cross-platform notification systems (e.g., Slack, email, or open-source alternatives). The workflow assumes use of the Azure Portal GUI and Microsoft Teams, which are more common in Windows/Microsoft environments, and does not provide parity for Linux-first or open-source workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Provide alternative examples using Azure CLI or Azure PowerShell (which are cross-platform) for steps currently described only in the Azure Portal.
  • Include guidance for integrating with non-Microsoft notification systems, such as Slack, email (SMTP), or open-source chat tools, to broaden applicability beyond Microsoft Teams.
  • Offer sample workflows using open-source automation tools (e.g., GitHub Actions, Jenkins, or shell scripts) that can be run on Linux systems.
  • Explicitly mention that Logic Apps and Teams are not required, and provide links or examples for Linux-friendly or platform-agnostic alternatives.
  • Add a section on how to perform similar automation using REST APIs and scripting (e.g., Bash, Python) for users who prefer or require Linux-native solutions.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation lists Azure PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) alongside Azure CLI, and mentions it before providing any Linux-specific alternatives or examples. There are no explicit Linux examples or mentions of Linux-native tools, which may suggest a subtle Windows bias.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and can be used on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Provide example commands for both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, making clear which are suitable for Linux users.
  • If referencing PowerShell, clarify that PowerShell Core is available cross-platform, or provide Bash shell equivalents.
  • Consider listing Azure CLI before Azure PowerShell to avoid the impression of Windows-first bias.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively describes how to create an Azure API center using the Azure portal, which is a web-based interface accessible from any OS. However, it omits any command-line instructions (such as Azure CLI or PowerShell), and does not provide Linux-specific or cross-platform examples. If command-line registration or automation is common, the lack of Azure CLI (which is cross-platform) examples may implicitly favor Windows users, as PowerShell is often the default scripting tool in Azure documentation.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples for registering the Microsoft.ApiCenter provider and creating an API center, as the CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • If PowerShell examples are provided elsewhere, ensure Azure CLI equivalents are always included and presented with equal prominence.
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal is web-based and accessible from any OS to avoid the impression of Windows bias.
  • Include links or references to documentation for performing the same tasks via CLI or automation tools, which are popular among Linux users.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively provides instructions using the Azure portal UI, which is a graphical interface commonly associated with Windows environments. There are no command-line examples (such as Azure CLI, PowerShell, or Bash), and no mention of Linux or cross-platform tooling. This may disadvantage users who prefer or require automation or command-line approaches, especially on Linux or macOS.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI examples for enabling managed identities and assigning roles, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal can be accessed from any OS, not just Windows.
  • Provide PowerShell and Bash script examples where appropriate, ensuring parity between Windows and Linux instructions.
  • Include a section or links for automating these steps using command-line tools for both Windows and Linux users.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for Azure CLI commands, but the PowerShell examples are labeled and formatted explicitly, suggesting a Windows-centric approach. The PowerShell examples are always presented immediately after the Bash examples, indicating a slight 'windows_first' bias. There are no missing Linux examples, but the explicit PowerShell formatting and comments may make Windows users feel more directly supported.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly label both Bash and PowerShell examples as 'Linux/macOS' and 'Windows' respectively to highlight cross-platform parity.
  • Present Bash (Linux/macOS) and PowerShell (Windows) examples in parallel tabs or sections, rather than always listing PowerShell after Bash.
  • Ensure that introductory text does not implicitly prioritize Windows or PowerShell usage.
  • Consider adding a brief note explaining that Azure CLI works identically on all platforms, and that users should choose the example matching their shell environment.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page references Visual Studio Code and its Azure API Center extension as prerequisites, which are available cross-platform. However, it only mentions the Visual Studio Code Marketplace link (which is Windows-centric by default) and does not clarify Linux installation steps or alternative editors. There are no explicit Linux examples or mentions of Linux-specific tools or workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Visual Studio Code and the Azure API Center extension are available on Linux and macOS, not just Windows.
  • Provide installation instructions or links for Visual Studio Code and the extension for Linux users.
  • If relevant, mention alternative editors or CLI tools that can be used on Linux.
  • Ensure that all steps and screenshots (if any) are not Windows-specific, or provide Linux/macOS equivalents.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for Azure CLI commands, but the PowerShell examples are labeled as 'Formatted for PowerShell' and are always presented immediately after the Bash examples. There is no explicit mention of Linux or macOS, and the PowerShell examples may suggest a Windows-first or Windows-heavy audience. However, Linux users are supported via Bash examples, and no Windows-only tools are referenced.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly label Bash examples as suitable for Linux/macOS and PowerShell examples as suitable for Windows to clarify cross-platform applicability.
  • Present Bash (Linux/macOS) and PowerShell (Windows) examples in parallel tabs or sections, rather than always listing Bash first, to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • Add a short note at the top of the CLI section explaining that both Linux/macOS (Bash) and Windows (PowerShell) users are supported, and how to choose the appropriate example.
  • Ensure that any platform-specific nuances (such as line continuation characters or variable assignment syntax) are briefly explained for both environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses Azure Portal, Logic Apps, and Microsoft Teams for workflow automation, all of which are primarily Microsoft/Windows-centric tools. There are no examples or mentions of Linux-native tools, CLI-based automation, or cross-platform notification systems such as Slack or open-source alternatives. The workflow is tightly coupled with the Azure Portal UI and Microsoft Teams, with no guidance for users who may prefer or require Linux-based or open-source solutions.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent automation steps using Azure CLI and/or Azure PowerShell, and clarify their cross-platform compatibility.
  • Include examples or references for integrating with non-Microsoft notification systems (e.g., Slack, Mattermost, email via SMTP) to broaden applicability.
  • Offer guidance for setting up similar workflows using open-source automation tools (such as Apache Airflow, Jenkins, or custom scripts) that can run on Linux.
  • Explicitly mention that Logic Apps and Teams are not required, and suggest alternatives for organizations using Linux or non-Microsoft collaboration tools.
  • Add a section or appendix with Linux-first or cross-platform automation patterns, including sample scripts and configuration steps.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation provides both bash and PowerShell syntax for Azure CLI commands, but consistently lists bash first and PowerShell second. While this is a positive step toward cross-platform parity, the explicit labeling of 'PowerShell syntax' and the inclusion of both syntaxes in every example may subtly reinforce a Windows-centric perspective. There are no Linux-specific tools, editors, or workflows mentioned, and the only editor referenced is Visual Studio Code, which is cross-platform but often associated with Windows. No explicit Linux bias or missing Linux examples are present, but the documentation could do more to highlight Linux-native workflows or tools.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that all CLI examples work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and consider alternating the order of bash and PowerShell examples to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • Include references to Linux-native editors (e.g., Vim, Emacs) or terminal workflows where appropriate, or at least acknowledge their use.
  • Add a short section or note confirming that all steps are fully supported on Linux and macOS, not just Windows.
  • If possible, provide a sample workflow or screenshot from a Linux environment to visually reinforce parity.
  • Avoid over-emphasizing PowerShell by only including it where syntax differences are significant, and otherwise default to bash for cross-platform clarity.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. While it claims that Azure CLI command examples can run in both PowerShell and bash, the only explicit command example is given in a generic CLI format without showing both PowerShell and bash syntax where they might differ. There is mention that separate examples are provided 'where needed,' but no Linux-specific (bash) example is actually shown. The documentation also references running CLI commands in PowerShell first, and the prerequisite section for Azure CLI setup is ambiguous about Linux-specific steps or differences.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit bash/Linux command examples alongside PowerShell examples wherever variable syntax or command usage differs.
  • Ensure that CLI setup instructions include Linux-specific prerequisites and installation steps, not just generic or Windows-focused guidance.
  • If referencing the ability to use both PowerShell and bash, demonstrate this parity by including both sets of examples where relevant.
  • Avoid language that defaults to Windows-first (e.g., mentioning PowerShell before bash), or alternate the order to show neutrality.
  • Include troubleshooting or environment notes for Linux users, such as common issues with Azure CLI on Linux.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation presents both Azure CLI and PowerShell examples for deploying the ARM template, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and is not clearly marked as Windows-only. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) examples, and the PowerShell section may suggest a Windows-first or Windows-heavy approach. However, Azure CLI is cross-platform and is presented first, which helps mitigate bias.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly indicate that Azure PowerShell examples are primarily for Windows users, and that Azure CLI is recommended for cross-platform (Linux, macOS, Windows) environments.
  • Add explicit bash shell examples (if any commands differ from Azure CLI usage on Windows) to demonstrate Linux parity.
  • In prerequisite sections, clarify which tools are cross-platform and which are Windows-specific.
  • Consider providing a table or callout summarizing which deployment tools are best suited for each OS.
  • If possible, include links or references to Linux-specific guidance for ARM template deployment.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and PowerShell examples for deploying the ARM template, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and there is no mention of Linux-specific considerations or shell environments (e.g., Bash). The structure and language (e.g., 'save to your local computer') are generic but do not explicitly address Linux users or provide Bash-specific guidance. The PowerShell example is presented immediately after the CLI example, which is common, but there is no explicit effort to highlight Linux parity or address potential differences.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS) and can be run in Bash or other shells.
  • Add a Bash-specific tab or section, or clarify that the CLI example is suitable for Bash/Linux shells.
  • If there are any Linux-specific steps (e.g., file paths, permissions), call them out.
  • Consider reordering to present CLI/Bash examples first, as they are more universally applicable.
  • Add a note that PowerShell Core is available on Linux, if relevant, to clarify cross-platform support.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation is heavily focused on Azure Portal UI and Microsoft 365 tools (Logic Apps, Microsoft Teams, Power Automate), which are primarily used in Windows-centric enterprise environments. There are no command-line examples, scripts, or alternative automation approaches for Linux users. The workflow assumes the use of Microsoft Teams for notifications, with no mention of alternatives like Slack or email, and all steps are described using the Azure Portal GUI, which is more familiar to Windows users. There is no coverage of CLI, REST API, or Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) methods that would be more platform-neutral or Linux-friendly.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI and/or Azure PowerShell command examples for each step, especially for resource creation, role assignment, and event subscription setup.
  • Include REST API examples for automation, which are platform-agnostic and can be used from any OS.
  • Offer alternative notification integrations (e.g., Slack, email, or webhooks) in addition to Microsoft Teams.
  • Document how to perform the workflow setup using Infrastructure-as-Code tools like Bicep, ARM templates, or Terraform.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed from Linux/macOS using the Azure CLI and provide links or examples.
  • If using screenshots, consider including CLI output or code snippets alongside portal images to ensure parity.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows/Azure portal bias by exclusively referencing the Azure portal UI and Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory) for identity management, with no mention of Linux command-line tools, cross-platform CLI alternatives, or non-Microsoft identity providers in practical examples. There are no PowerShell-specific commands, but all workflows are described in the context of the Azure portal, which is most familiar to Windows users. There are no Linux shell/CLI examples, and no mention of using Azure CLI, REST APIs, or automation scripts that are platform-agnostic.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) commands for all portal-based steps, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and works on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Include REST API examples for automation and platform neutrality.
  • Mention and, where possible, provide examples for using non-Microsoft identity providers (e.g., Auth0, Okta) for OAuth 2.0, not just Microsoft Entra ID.
  • Explicitly state that all steps can be performed from any OS using the Azure CLI or REST API, and provide links to relevant documentation.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, highlighting any differences or confirming parity.
  • If screenshots are used, consider including at least one from a non-Windows environment (e.g., browser on Linux/macOS) to reinforce cross-platform support.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a subtle Windows bias by consistently referencing 'command prompt' and using language and conventions familiar to Windows users, such as keyboard shortcuts (e.g., CTRL+C) and command prompt terminology. There are no explicit Linux or macOS shell examples, nor is there mention of alternative shells or terminal environments. The only command-line example is a generic 'devproxy' command, but the context and tips (such as downloading a preset in 'the command prompt') assume a Windows environment. No Linux-specific instructions, screenshots, or troubleshooting are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Include explicit Linux/macOS shell examples alongside Windows command prompt instructions (e.g., show both 'Command Prompt' and 'Bash' usage).
  • Replace or supplement 'command prompt' references with 'terminal' or 'shell' to be more platform-agnostic.
  • Add notes or tips for Linux/macOS users, such as installation steps, file path conventions, and keyboard shortcuts (e.g., CTRL+C is universal, but clarify if any hotkeys differ).
  • Provide at least one screenshot or terminal output from a Linux or macOS environment.
  • Mention any platform-specific requirements or troubleshooting steps for non-Windows users.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation assumes the use of Visual Studio Code and Microsoft-centric tools, but does not provide any platform-specific instructions or examples. While VS Code is cross-platform, there are implicit biases: keyboard shortcuts are given in Windows format (Ctrl+Shift+P), and there is no mention of Linux or macOS equivalents. There are no terminal/CLI examples, and all instructions are GUI-based, which may disadvantage Linux users who prefer CLI workflows. The documentation also presumes the use of Microsoft Entra ID and Azure, which are more common in Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Visual Studio Code and the Azure API Center extension are available on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Provide keyboard shortcut alternatives for macOS (e.g., Cmd+Shift+P) alongside Windows/Linux (Ctrl+Shift+P).
  • If there are CLI or terminal-based ways to perform tasks (such as connecting to the API Center), include those examples, especially for Linux users.
  • Clarify that all steps and screenshots apply equally to Linux and macOS, or note any platform-specific differences.
  • Consider including a section or note for users who prefer terminal workflows, especially common in Linux environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for Azure CLI commands, but consistently lists Bash first and PowerShell second. There is no exclusive use of Windows tools, but the explicit inclusion of PowerShell syntax throughout, and references to Visual Studio Code (a cross-platform tool but with strong Windows association), may suggest a slight Windows bias. However, Linux users are not excluded, and Bash examples are always present and prioritized.
Recommendations:
  • Continue to provide both Bash and PowerShell examples, but clarify that Bash examples work on Linux/macOS and Windows (with WSL or Git Bash), and PowerShell is available cross-platform.
  • Explicitly mention that Visual Studio Code and Azure CLI are fully supported on Linux and macOS, not just Windows.
  • Where possible, include a short note or table at the start of the CLI sections explaining which shells/environments are supported for each example.
  • Consider adding a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, highlighting any platform-specific considerations (if any).
  • If there are any steps that are easier or different on Linux (e.g., using native package managers), mention them.