60
Total Pages
43
Linux-Friendly Pages
17
Pages with Bias
28.3%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

181 issues found
Showing 1-25 of 181 flagged pages
API Center Perform API linting and analysis - Azure API Center ...ain/articles/api-center/enable-api-analysis-linting.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides command examples for both bash and PowerShell, but PowerShell syntax is consistently presented immediately after bash, and sometimes with more detail. There is a strong reliance on Azure CLI and Visual Studio Code, which are cross-platform, but the documentation does not mention Linux-specific tools or workflows (e.g., native Linux editors, package managers, or automation patterns). Portal instructions assume familiarity with the Azure Portal UI, which is platform-agnostic but often used on Windows. No explicit Linux desktop screenshots or references are present. There are no examples using Linux-native shells (e.g., zsh, fish), nor are there troubleshooting tips for Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Present bash/Linux shell examples before PowerShell, or alternate the order to avoid implicit Windows-first bias.
  • Include explicit references to Linux environments, such as using Linux package managers (apt, yum) for installing prerequisites.
  • Add troubleshooting notes for common Linux issues (e.g., file permissions, environment variables).
  • Mention or show usage with Linux-native editors (e.g., Vim, Emacs) and terminal emulators.
  • Include screenshots or instructions from a Linux desktop environment where relevant.
  • Clarify that all CLI commands work on Linux, and provide guidance for any platform-specific differences.
API Center Synchronize APIs from Azure API Management instance ...articles/api-center/synchronize-api-management-apis.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Azure CLI examples are described as runnable in both PowerShell and bash, but the explicit mention of PowerShell first and the lack of concrete bash-specific examples or Linux shell screenshots suggest a Windows-first approach. There are no Linux-specific instructions or troubleshooting notes, and portal instructions are generic but the CLI section does not show parity for Linux users (e.g., variable syntax differences, environment setup).
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit bash/Linux shell examples alongside PowerShell, especially where syntax differs.
  • Include screenshots or instructions that reflect Linux environments (e.g., terminal screenshots, common Linux shell usage patterns).
  • Add troubleshooting notes or prerequisites relevant to Linux users (e.g., package dependencies, environment setup for Azure CLI on Linux).
  • Ensure that references to running CLI commands do not prioritize PowerShell over bash; consider listing bash first or equally.
  • Mention any platform-specific considerations (e.g., authentication, managed identity setup) for Linux users.
API Center Quickstart - Create Your Azure API Center - ARM Template .../articles/api-center/set-up-api-center-arm-template.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and PowerShell examples for deploying ARM templates, but PowerShell is a Windows-centric tool and is presented alongside CLI without clarifying platform parity. There is no mention of Linux-specific patterns (e.g., Bash scripting, native Linux tools), and instructions for uploading files reference Azure Cloud Shell generically, without explicit Linux guidance. The page does not offer Linux-first or Linux-specific examples, and PowerShell is given equal prominence despite its Windows bias.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work natively on Linux, macOS, and Windows, while PowerShell is primarily Windows-focused (though available on Linux, but less commonly used).
  • Provide Linux-specific instructions for uploading files (e.g., using scp, curl, or native shell commands) to Azure Cloud Shell or local environments.
  • Add Bash script examples for ARM template deployment, especially for Linux users.
  • Clarify in the prerequisites section which tools are recommended for Linux users (e.g., Azure CLI, Bash) and which are Windows-centric (PowerShell).
  • Consider listing CLI (cross-platform) examples before PowerShell (Windows-centric) to reduce Windows-first bias.
API Center Workflow automation after API registration - Azure API Center ...in/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is heavily oriented toward Azure portal and Microsoft Teams, both of which are primarily Windows-centric tools. All workflow steps are described using the Azure portal UI, with no mention of CLI, REST API, or automation options that would be more accessible to Linux users. There are no examples using bash, Azure CLI, or Linux-native tools, and all notification workflows are shown with Microsoft Teams, with no mention of alternatives like Slack or email. Power Automate is referenced, but only as a similar option, not as an example. The documentation assumes use of the Azure portal, which is most fully featured on Windows, and does not provide parity for Linux users who may prefer command-line or non-GUI approaches.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent workflow automation steps using Azure CLI and/or REST API, with bash script examples for Linux users.
  • Include instructions for setting up event subscriptions and managed identities using command-line tools.
  • Offer notification workflow examples using open standards (e.g., email via SMTP, Slack webhooks) in addition to Microsoft Teams.
  • Reference and demonstrate automation options that are platform-agnostic, such as using curl, jq, or other Linux-native utilities.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility and provide links to documentation for Linux/macOS users.
  • Where possible, show both GUI (portal) and CLI/automation approaches side by side.
API Center Quickstart - Create Your Azure API Center - ARM Template .../articles/api-center/set-up-api-center-arm-template.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for deploying ARM templates, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to CLI, and is mentioned in headings and prerequisites. There is no mention of Linux-specific patterns, nor are Linux shell examples (e.g., Bash) provided. The instructions reference uploading files to Azure Cloud Shell, but do not clarify Linux workflows or tools (such as native Bash scripting or Linux file paths). The overall structure and example order suggest a Windows-first approach, with PowerShell featured as a primary method.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Bash examples for Linux users, including file path conventions and scripting patterns.
  • Clarify instructions for uploading and handling files on Linux systems (e.g., using scp, curl, or native Linux editors).
  • Reorder examples to present Azure CLI (cross-platform) first, and PowerShell second, or clarify that CLI is recommended for Linux/macOS.
  • Mention Linux-specific prerequisites or environment setup steps, such as installing Azure CLI on Linux.
  • Avoid assuming use of Windows tools or PowerShell in generic instructions; provide parity for Linux workflows.
API Center Workflow automation after API registration - Azure API Center ...in/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by exclusively referencing the Azure portal (a web UI often used from Windows), Microsoft Teams, and Azure Logic Apps, all of which are Microsoft-centric tools. There are no examples or mentions of Linux-native automation tools, CLI alternatives, or open-source notification platforms. All workflow steps are described using the Azure portal UI, with no parity for command-line or Linux-first approaches. The notification workflow is tightly integrated with Microsoft Teams, with no mention of alternatives like Slack or email, which are commonly used in Linux-heavy organizations.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent workflow automation steps using Azure CLI or REST API, which can be run from Linux or macOS environments.
  • Include examples for integrating with non-Microsoft notification platforms (e.g., Slack, email, Mattermost) to broaden applicability.
  • Add instructions for configuring the workflow using Infrastructure-as-Code tools (e.g., Bicep, Terraform, ARM templates), which are platform-agnostic.
  • Reference PowerShell only alongside Bash or other Linux shell examples if scripting is required.
  • Clarify that the Azure portal is accessible from any OS, but offer CLI or code-based alternatives for all steps.
  • Mention open-source workflow engines (e.g., Apache Airflow, n8n) as possible alternatives for organizations not using Logic Apps.
API Center Synchronize APIs from Amazon API Gateway - Azure API Center ...in/articles/api-center/synchronize-aws-gateway-apis.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a slight Windows bias by referencing Azure CLI usage in both PowerShell and bash, but provides no explicit Linux-specific examples or screenshots. The instructions for Azure Key Vault and other Azure services are oriented around the Azure portal, which is platform-agnostic but often associated with Windows environments. There is no mention of Linux tools or patterns, and the CLI examples do not show Linux-specific nuances (such as environment variable syntax differences).
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux/bash examples where variable syntax or command usage differs from PowerShell.
  • Include screenshots or instructions using Linux terminals or tools (e.g., Ubuntu, macOS) alongside Azure portal steps.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI commands work cross-platform and highlight any platform-specific considerations.
  • Reference Linux-native credential management tools as alternatives to Azure Key Vault where appropriate.
  • Ensure that all example commands and instructions are tested and presented for both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux (bash) environments.
API Center Perform API linting and analysis - Azure API Center ...ain/articles/api-center/enable-api-analysis-linting.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Portal Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides command examples for both bash and PowerShell, but PowerShell syntax is consistently presented immediately after bash, and sometimes with explicit labeling, which may subtly prioritize Windows users. The use of Visual Studio Code and Azure portal is emphasized for deployment and configuration steps, which are more common in Windows environments. There is no mention of Linux-specific tools or editors (e.g., Vim, nano), nor are there instructions for deploying from Linux-native environments or using Linux package managers. The documentation does not provide parity for Linux users in terms of alternative workflows or troubleshooting, and the overall flow assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tools and patterns.
Recommendations
  • Present bash and PowerShell examples side-by-side, or alternate which comes first, to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • Include explicit instructions for Linux users, such as using Linux-native editors (e.g., Vim, nano) for editing files, and mention Linux package managers for installing prerequisites.
  • Provide troubleshooting tips or notes for common issues encountered on Linux (e.g., file permissions, environment variables).
  • Add references to Linux desktop environments and command-line workflows, such as using terminal-only deployment or alternative IDEs (e.g., JetBrains Fleet, Emacs).
  • Clarify that all CLI commands are cross-platform and provide links to platform-specific installation guides for Azure CLI and azd.
  • Include screenshots or walkthroughs from Linux environments (e.g., Ubuntu, Fedora) to demonstrate parity.
API Center Quickstart - Create Your Azure API Center - ARM Template .../articles/api-center/set-up-api-center-arm-template.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page presents both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for deploying an ARM template, but PowerShell is given equal prominence despite being a Windows-centric tool. The inclusion of PowerShell requirements and examples, as well as references to uploading files to the local computer (which often implies Windows workflows), suggests a subtle Windows bias. There is no mention of Linux-specific patterns, such as using Bash or shell scripting, nor are there examples tailored to Linux environments (e.g., file paths, shell commands).
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux/Bash examples alongside CLI and PowerShell, including file path conventions and shell scripting patterns.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI works cross-platform and provide instructions for Linux and macOS users (e.g., using ~/azuredeploy.json for file paths).
  • Mention Linux-native tools and workflows, such as using curl/wget for downloading templates and chmod for permissions.
  • Ensure that instructions for uploading files to Azure Cloud Shell are platform-neutral or include Linux/macOS steps.
  • Consider listing CLI (cross-platform) examples before PowerShell (Windows-centric) to reduce perceived Windows-first bias.
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation mentions Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI as tools for reviewing deployed resources, but lists Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI, which may suggest a Windows-first approach. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples or references, and PowerShell is primarily associated with Windows environments. The documentation does not provide command-line examples for either tool, nor does it clarify cross-platform usage.
Recommendations
  • List Azure CLI before Azure PowerShell, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux.
  • Explicitly mention that both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell are available on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Provide example commands for both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, and clarify which platforms they run on.
  • Consider adding references to Bash or other Linux-native tools if relevant.
API Center Quickstart - Create Your Azure API Center - Bicep ...ob/main/articles/api-center/set-up-api-center-bicep.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for deploying Bicep files, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and is referenced in custom metadata and prerequisites. There is no mention of Linux-specific shell environments (e.g., Bash), nor are there any examples tailored for Linux users. The documentation assumes familiarity with PowerShell and Windows tooling, potentially making it less accessible for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Bash shell examples alongside Azure CLI commands to demonstrate usage in Linux environments.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI works cross-platform and provide guidance for Linux/Mac users, including installation and usage notes.
  • Reduce emphasis on PowerShell by listing Azure CLI (which is cross-platform) first in examples and prerequisites.
  • Include notes or sections on using Bicep and Azure CLI in Linux environments, such as using Cloud Shell or local Bash terminals.
  • Review metadata and custom tags to ensure they do not prioritize Windows/PowerShell tooling over cross-platform alternatives.
API Center Workflow automation after API registration - Azure API Center ...in/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is heavily oriented toward Windows and Microsoft ecosystem tools, such as Azure Portal, Logic Apps, and Microsoft Teams. All examples and instructions assume use of the Azure Portal (a web GUI), with no mention of Linux-native tools, CLI, or open-source alternatives. There are no examples for Linux users, nor are cross-platform automation options (e.g., Bash scripts, Linux notification systems, or open-source workflow engines) discussed. The notification workflow is built around Microsoft Teams, with no mention of alternatives like Slack or email, which are common in Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent instructions for setting up the workflow using Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux.
  • Include examples of automating API status updates using Bash scripts or other Linux-native tools.
  • Mention and, where possible, provide examples for integrating with alternative notification systems (e.g., Slack, email, Mattermost) in addition to Microsoft Teams.
  • Clarify which steps are platform-agnostic (web portal) and which could be performed via CLI or REST API, and provide those alternatives.
  • Highlight open-source or cross-platform workflow automation options (e.g., Apache Airflow, n8n) that could be used with Azure Event Grid.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/set-up-api-center-arm-template.md .../articles/api-center/set-up-api-center-arm-template.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation presents both Azure CLI and PowerShell examples for deploying ARM templates, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to CLI, and is mentioned in prerequisites and deployment steps. There is no mention of Linux-specific tools or workflows (e.g., bash scripting, Linux file paths), and the instructions for uploading files reference Azure Cloud Shell generically, without clarifying Linux-specific steps. The inclusion of PowerShell as a primary method and lack of Linux-specific guidance suggests a mild Windows bias.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux examples, such as bash scripts for deployment and Linux file path conventions.
  • Clarify steps for uploading files in Linux environments (e.g., using scp or curl).
  • Include notes on using Azure CLI in native Linux terminals, not just Cloud Shell.
  • If referencing PowerShell, mention that it is available cross-platform, but highlight Linux-native alternatives.
  • Ensure that CLI examples are presented first, as CLI is platform-neutral, and provide additional context for Linux users.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md ...in/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by exclusively referencing the Azure portal (a web GUI most commonly used on Windows), Microsoft Teams, and Azure Logic Apps, all of which are Microsoft-centric tools. There are no examples or mentions of Linux-native tools, CLI workflows, or alternative notification platforms (such as Slack or email). The workflow steps are described entirely in terms of GUI interactions and Microsoft ecosystem integrations, with no parity for Linux command-line or open-source automation approaches.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent workflow automation examples using Azure CLI and/or PowerShell, and clearly indicate cross-platform compatibility.
  • Include instructions or examples for configuring similar notification workflows using Linux-friendly tools (e.g., Bash scripts, curl, or third-party automation platforms like Zapier or IFTTT).
  • Mention alternative notification channels such as Slack, email, or open-source chat platforms, and provide sample integrations.
  • Explicitly state that the Azure portal and Logic Apps are accessible from any OS via web browser, and highlight any platform-specific limitations.
  • Add a section or links to documentation for Linux users, such as using Azure CLI to manage API Center resources and event subscriptions.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/enable-api-analysis-linting.md ...ain/articles/api-center/enable-api-analysis-linting.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and PowerShell syntax for command-line examples, but PowerShell examples are consistently presented alongside or immediately after bash examples, sometimes with explicit 'PowerShell syntax' labels. There is a strong focus on using the Azure portal (a GUI tool most commonly used on Windows), and Visual Studio Code is referenced as the primary IDE, which is popular on Windows but also available cross-platform. However, there are no explicit Linux-specific instructions, troubleshooting tips, or mentions of Linux-native tools or environments. The documentation does not address differences in shell environments (e.g., zsh, fish) or potential issues on Linux, nor does it provide parity for Linux users in terms of screenshots or step-by-step guidance for non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux-specific instructions or troubleshooting tips, especially for Azure CLI usage in bash/zsh/fish shells.
  • Include screenshots or step-by-step guidance using Linux desktop environments (e.g., GNOME, KDE) and terminal emulators.
  • Add notes about differences in file paths, environment variables, and permissions that may affect Linux users.
  • Mention alternative editors (e.g., Vim, Emacs) or provide guidance for using Visual Studio Code on Linux.
  • Ensure that bash examples are presented first or equally with PowerShell, and clarify that all CLI commands work on Linux.
  • Address any platform-specific issues with Azure Functions deployment or Event Grid configuration on Linux.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/includes/configure-managed-identity-apim-reader.md ...ter/includes/configure-managed-identity-apim-reader.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for Azure CLI commands, but PowerShell (Windows) examples are always given immediately after Bash, and the Bash examples are not explicitly labeled as 'Linux/macOS'. There is no mention of Linux-specific tools or environments, and the structure implicitly prioritizes Windows by giving PowerShell parity and not clarifying platform differences. The portal instructions are platform-neutral, but the CLI section could be clearer for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly label Bash examples as 'Linux/macOS' and PowerShell as 'Windows'.
  • Provide a short note at the start of the CLI section explaining which example is for which platform.
  • Consider listing Bash (Linux/macOS) examples first to reduce implicit Windows-first bias.
  • Add troubleshooting notes for common platform-specific issues (e.g., line endings, quoting differences).
  • Mention that Azure CLI works cross-platform and link to installation instructions for Linux/macOS.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/includes/quickstart-template-review-resources.md ...enter/includes/quickstart-template-review-resources.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation mentions Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI as tools to review deployed resources, listing Azure PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) alongside Azure CLI, without clarifying cross-platform compatibility or providing Linux-specific guidance. There are no explicit Linux examples or instructions, and the mention of Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI may suggest a Windows-first approach.
Recommendations
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and works on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Provide explicit examples for both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, indicating which platforms they are supported on.
  • Consider listing Azure CLI before Azure PowerShell to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Add instructions or examples for Linux users, such as command-line usage in bash.
  • Mention installation steps or links for Azure CLI on Linux.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/synchronize-aws-gateway-apis.md ...in/articles/api-center/synchronize-aws-gateway-apis.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates mild Windows bias. While it claims Azure CLI examples can run in both PowerShell and bash, the only CLI example provided uses Windows-style line continuation (backslash) and does not show a bash-specific variant. Portal instructions are Windows-centric, referencing the Azure portal, with no mention of cross-platform alternatives. There are no explicit Linux shell examples, nor is there guidance for Linux users regarding Azure Key Vault or other steps.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit bash/Linux shell examples for Azure CLI commands, using appropriate line continuation (\ for PowerShell, \ for bash, or single-line commands).
  • Add notes or sections for Linux users, clarifying any differences in workflow (e.g., accessing Azure portal, storing secrets).
  • Where variable syntax differs between PowerShell and bash, show both variants side-by-side.
  • Mention cross-platform tools and alternatives where possible, such as Azure Cloud Shell (which supports both bash and PowerShell).
  • Ensure screenshots and UI instructions are not Windows-centric, or clarify that the portal is accessible from any OS.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/set-up-api-center-bicep.md ...ob/main/articles/api-center/set-up-api-center-bicep.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for deploying the Bicep file, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI. There is no mention of Linux-specific shell environments (e.g., Bash) or alternative deployment methods that are native to Linux. The prerequisites section references Azure PowerShell requirements, which may reinforce a Windows bias. The documentation does not provide explicit Linux examples or guidance for Linux users, and PowerShell is presented as a primary option alongside CLI, despite its Windows origins.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI works natively on Linux, macOS, and Windows, while Azure PowerShell is most commonly used on Windows.
  • Provide Bash shell examples or clarify that the Azure CLI commands are intended for Bash or compatible shells on Linux/macOS.
  • Add a note or section for Linux users, including steps for installing Azure CLI and deploying Bicep files from a Linux environment.
  • Avoid listing PowerShell before CLI or presenting it as an equally default option unless there is a clear cross-platform parity.
  • Reference cross-platform tools and environments (e.g., VS Code, Cloud Shell) that work on Linux, and clarify any Windows-specific steps.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md ...in/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by exclusively referencing the Azure portal (a web UI often associated with Windows workflows), Microsoft Teams (a Microsoft-centric collaboration tool), and Azure Logic Apps, with no mention of Linux-native tools, CLI, or open-source alternatives. All examples and instructions are given using graphical interfaces and Microsoft ecosystem products, with no parity for Linux command-line workflows or non-Microsoft notification channels. There are no examples using Azure CLI, Bash, or Linux automation tools, nor are alternatives to Teams (such as Slack or email) discussed.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent instructions and examples using Azure CLI and Bash scripts for workflow automation, including event subscription and API property updates.
  • Provide examples for integrating with non-Microsoft notification channels (e.g., Slack, email, webhook endpoints) to broaden applicability beyond Microsoft Teams.
  • Include Linux-friendly automation options, such as using cron jobs, shell scripts, or open-source workflow engines (e.g., Apache Airflow) for similar event-driven automation.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility and provide guidance for users working in Linux environments, including troubleshooting steps and UI alternatives.
  • Ensure that references to tools and interfaces do not assume a Windows-first or Microsoft-only ecosystem, and present alternatives in parallel where possible.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md ...in/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-09-16 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation is heavily oriented around Azure Portal (a web UI) and Microsoft-centric tools such as Logic Apps and Microsoft Teams, with no mention of Linux-native or cross-platform alternatives. There are no CLI, Bash, or Linux automation examples, and all workflow automation is described using Microsoft GUI tools. The notification workflow is tied to Microsoft Teams, with no mention of alternatives like Slack or email. The documentation assumes the use of the Azure Portal and does not provide parity for users who prefer or require command-line or Linux-based automation.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent examples using Azure CLI and Bash scripts for automation steps, including event subscription and API property updates.
  • Include instructions for configuring notifications using cross-platform tools (e.g., Slack, email, or webhooks) in addition to Microsoft Teams.
  • Mention and demonstrate how to automate the workflow using PowerShell, Azure CLI, or REST API calls, with examples runnable on Linux/macOS.
  • Add a section or callouts for users who prefer infrastructure-as-code (e.g., using Bicep, ARM templates, or Terraform) for setting up Logic Apps and event subscriptions.
  • Ensure that any references to Microsoft-specific tools (Teams, Logic Apps) are balanced with alternatives or at least acknowledge that other options exist.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/synchronize-api-management-apis.md ...articles/api-center/synchronize-api-management-apis.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-08-23 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a mild Windows bias. While it states that Azure CLI commands can be run in both PowerShell and bash, it does not provide any explicit Linux/bash-specific examples or address Linux-specific considerations. The mention of PowerShell precedes bash, and there are no Linux-native tools or troubleshooting steps. The documentation assumes parity but does not demonstrate it with concrete examples or screenshots from Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit bash/Linux command examples where variable syntax or behavior differs from PowerShell.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output from Linux environments to illustrate cross-platform usage.
  • Mention Linux-native tools or troubleshooting steps if applicable.
  • When referencing shells, alternate the order (e.g., 'bash or PowerShell') or clarify that both are equally supported.
  • Add a note confirming that all steps and UI are identical on Linux, or highlight any differences if they exist.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md ...in/articles/api-center/set-up-notification-workflow.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-08-14 00:01
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation is heavily oriented toward Azure Portal (web UI) and Microsoft-first tools (Logic Apps, Microsoft Teams, Power Automate), with no mention of Linux-native or cross-platform alternatives. All examples and instructions are given using the Azure Portal and Microsoft ecosystem tools, with no CLI, REST API, or scripting examples that would be more platform-agnostic. There is no mention of Linux, Bash, or open-source notification/collaboration tools, and all automation is described in terms of Microsoft products.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent instructions using Azure CLI and/or Azure PowerShell, and ensure CLI examples are cross-platform (Bash and PowerShell).
  • Include REST API examples for automation steps, allowing users to script workflows on any OS.
  • Mention and, where possible, provide examples for integrating with open-source or cross-platform notification tools (e.g., Slack, Mattermost) in addition to Microsoft Teams.
  • Clarify that Logic Apps and Power Automate are web-based and can be used from any OS, but also provide guidance for users who prefer to automate via code or scripts.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux users, highlighting any differences or additional steps required.
  • Reference documentation for using Azure Event Grid and Logic Apps via CLI or REST, not just the Portal.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/enable-api-center-portal-vs-code-extension.md ...i-center/enable-api-center-portal-vs-code-extension.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-08-14 00:01
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page is heavily oriented toward Visual Studio Code and Azure tools, which are cross-platform, but it implicitly assumes a Windows environment by referencing Microsoft-specific identity systems (Microsoft Entra ID, Azure RBAC), and only provides instructions and screenshots for Visual Studio Code without clarifying Linux/Mac parity. There are no explicit Linux (or Mac) command-line examples, nor is there mention of platform-specific differences or requirements. The use of keyboard shortcuts (Ctrl+Shift+P) and references to the Azure portal may be more familiar to Windows users. There is no mention of Linux-specific installation steps, troubleshooting, or alternative tools.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state that Visual Studio Code and the Azure API Center extension are supported on Windows, Linux, and Mac, and provide links to platform-specific installation instructions.
  • Include screenshots or notes indicating that the UI and steps are the same (or different) on Linux/Mac.
  • Mention any platform-specific prerequisites or troubleshooting steps, such as authentication issues or extension compatibility on Linux.
  • Provide alternative keyboard shortcuts for Mac (e.g., Cmd+Shift+P) where appropriate.
  • If any steps require use of the Azure CLI or PowerShell, provide equivalent commands for Bash/Linux environments.
  • Clarify that Microsoft Entra ID and Azure RBAC are cloud-based and not tied to a specific OS, to reduce the impression of Windows-centricity.
API Center https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/api-center/includes/quickstart-template-review-resources.md ...enter/includes/quickstart-template-review-resources.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-08-14 00:01
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation lists Azure PowerShell alongside Azure CLI as tools for reviewing deployed resources, but mentions Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI, which may suggest a Windows-first or PowerShell-heavy bias. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples or references, and the documentation does not provide command-line examples for either platform, missing an opportunity to demonstrate parity.
Recommendations
  • List Azure CLI before Azure PowerShell, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and more commonly used on Linux.
  • Provide explicit command-line examples for both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, showing equivalent commands.
  • Mention that Azure CLI is available on Windows, Linux, and macOS, emphasizing its cross-platform nature.
  • If referencing PowerShell, clarify that PowerShell Core is also available cross-platform, or provide Bash examples where appropriate.
Previous Page 1 of 8 Next