Azure Netapp Files

252
Total Pages
149
Linux-Friendly Pages
103
Pages with Bias
40.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

896 issues found
Showing 226-250 of 896 flagged pages
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-nfs.md ...-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-nfs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page shows evidence of Windows bias in the section addressing NFS access from Windows clients. It provides explicit PowerShell commands and Windows mount examples, but does not offer equivalent Linux commands or examples for troubleshooting or mounting NFS volumes. Windows tooling and patterns are described in detail, while Linux-specific guidance is either referenced externally or omitted in troubleshooting scenarios.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and mount commands alongside Windows examples, especially in sections discussing client-side configuration and performance issues.
  • Provide equivalent Linux commands for enabling case-sensitive lookups and mounting NFS volumes, such as using 'mount' with appropriate options.
  • Ensure that examples and guidance for both Windows and Linux are presented in parallel, or Linux-first when discussing NFS, which is more commonly used in Linux environments.
  • Reference Linux tools (e.g., nfs-utils, mount.nfs) and configuration files (e.g., /etc/nfsmount.conf) where relevant.
  • Review all sections for parity in detail and clarity between Windows and Linux instructions, especially in troubleshooting and performance optimization contexts.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/generate-user-group-quota-reports.md ...zure-netapp-files/generate-user-group-quota-reports.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing Azure PowerShell examples for feature registration and status checking, mentioning PowerShell commands first, and only referencing Azure CLI as an alternative without showing explicit CLI command examples. There are no Linux-specific instructions or examples, and the documentation does not mention Linux tools, shell commands, or patterns that would be familiar to Linux administrators.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell examples for feature registration and status checking.
  • Include Linux shell command equivalents or instructions where relevant, especially for administrators who may use Linux environments.
  • Ensure that CLI examples are presented with equal prominence and detail as PowerShell examples, rather than as a secondary mention.
  • Consider adding a section or note addressing Linux users, clarifying that all operations can be performed from Linux environments using Azure CLI.
  • Avoid assuming the use of Windows-specific tools or patterns unless absolutely necessary, and always offer cross-platform alternatives.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/includes/smb-continuous-availability.md ...e-netapp-files/includes/smb-continuous-availability.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing exclusively on Windows-based workloads and tools (e.g., Citrix, FSLogix, MSIX, SQL Server on Windows), explicitly stating that Linux SQL Server is not supported, and omitting any Linux-specific examples or guidance. The instructions and recommendations are tailored to Windows environments, with no mention of Linux equivalents or alternatives.
Recommendations
  • Clearly state the lack of Linux support up front, and provide a roadmap or reference for future Linux support if applicable.
  • If possible, include information about alternative solutions or workarounds for Linux users, or direct them to relevant documentation.
  • Where Windows-specific tools or privileges are mentioned (e.g., SeSecurityPrivilege, Active Directory), provide Linux analogs or clarify that these steps are not applicable to Linux.
  • Add a section or note explicitly addressing Linux users, outlining current limitations and any planned enhancements for parity.
  • Ensure future updates consider Linux workloads and provide examples or guidance for both platforms where feasible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/large-volumes-requirements-considerations.md ...app-files/large-volumes-requirements-considerations.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in its operational examples and instructions. Feature registration and status checks are shown primarily using Azure PowerShell commands, with Azure CLI (cross-platform) mentioned only as a secondary option. No Linux-specific shell examples (e.g., bash) are provided, and PowerShell commands are presented first and most prominently. There is no mention of Linux tools or patterns for volume management or feature registration, despite the product's relevance for Linux workloads (as referenced in performance benchmarks).
Recommendations
  • Present Azure CLI (cross-platform) commands before or alongside PowerShell examples for feature registration and status checks.
  • Include explicit bash shell examples for Linux users where applicable.
  • Add notes or sections highlighting Linux-specific considerations or tools for managing Azure NetApp Files large volumes.
  • Ensure that operational instructions are platform-neutral or provide parity for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Review other command-line examples throughout the documentation to ensure Linux users are equally supported.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol-schemas.md ...files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol-schemas.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. It focuses almost exclusively on Microsoft Active Directory as the LDAP provider, describes attribute indexing only in the context of AD, and provides configuration instructions using Windows-specific tools (ADSI Edit). There are no examples, instructions, or references for equivalent operations on Linux-based LDAP servers (such as OpenLDAP), nor are Linux tools or patterns mentioned. The UNIX attributes are discussed only as they relate to AD, and all screenshots and configuration steps are Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent instructions for configuring attribute indexing in popular Linux LDAP servers (e.g., OpenLDAP), including relevant tools and configuration files.
  • Provide examples of how UNIX attributes are managed in non-AD LDAP environments.
  • Include screenshots or command-line examples for Linux tools (such as ldapmodify, slapd.conf, or phpldapadmin) where appropriate.
  • Clarify that Azure NetApp Files supports LDAP servers other than Active Directory, if applicable, and describe any differences in schema handling.
  • Present Linux/OpenLDAP examples before or alongside Windows/AD examples to ensure parity.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/kerberos.md ...docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/kerberos.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently referencing Windows Active Directory as the only supported KDC, prioritizing Windows terminology and workflows, and providing examples and tool references (such as setspn, MMC, and Event Viewer) that are Windows-centric. Linux-specific tools, workflows, and examples are either missing or mentioned only in passing, often as exceptions or caveats. Windows tools and patterns are described in detail, while Linux equivalents (such as kadmin, klist, or keytab management) are not covered. Troubleshooting and configuration guidance is focused on Windows environments, with minimal practical guidance for Linux administrators.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state support or limitations for non-Windows KDCs (such as MIT or Heimdal) and provide guidance for integrating with them if possible.
  • Include Linux-focused examples for Kerberos configuration, such as keytab creation and management using kadmin, klist, and ktutil.
  • Provide step-by-step Linux client configuration and troubleshooting workflows, including krb5.conf setup, keytab placement, and common error resolution.
  • Reference Linux tools and commands (e.g., kinit, klist, ktutil) alongside or before Windows tools when discussing Kerberos principals, tickets, and SPNs.
  • Offer parity in troubleshooting guidance, such as how to view Kerberos errors in Linux logs (e.g., /var/log/secure, journalctl) and interpret common error codes.
  • Add Linux-specific sections for NFS Kerberos workflows, including mounting examples and best practices for hostname and SPN management.
  • Clarify any Azure NetApp Files limitations regarding non-Windows environments and suggest workarounds or alternatives where possible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol-name-mapping.md ...https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol-name-mapping.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively describing the configuration of asymmetric name mapping using Windows tools (Active Directory Users and Computers MMC), mentioning Windows procedures first, and omitting equivalent instructions for configuring LDAP attributes using Linux tools or CLI. The only Linux-related content is a verification step, not a configuration example.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent instructions for configuring LDAP user attributes (such as UID) using common Linux tools (e.g., ldapmodify, phpldapadmin, or command-line utilities).
  • Include screenshots or code snippets showing how to edit LDAP attributes from a Linux environment.
  • Present both Windows and Linux configuration options side-by-side or in parallel sections to ensure parity.
  • Avoid assuming the administrator will use Windows tools; acknowledge hybrid environments and offer cross-platform guidance.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol.md ...-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by prioritizing Microsoft Active Directory and Entra Domain Services as LDAP servers, mentioning Windows-specific tools (e.g., nslookup with Windows syntax) before Linux equivalents, and providing examples primarily in Windows format. Linux/UNIX alternatives (such as FreeIPA, OpenLDAP, Red Hat Directory Server) are mentioned only in a note and not integrated into the main narrative or examples. There is a lack of Linux-focused configuration guidance and command examples, and the documentation assumes a Windows-centric environment for LDAP integration.
Recommendations
  • Provide equal coverage of Linux/UNIX LDAP servers (FreeIPA, OpenLDAP, Red Hat Directory Server) in the main text, not just in notes.
  • Include Linux command examples (e.g., dig, ldapsearch) alongside or before Windows examples for querying LDAP service records and troubleshooting.
  • Add configuration guidance and examples for integrating Azure NetApp Files with non-Windows LDAP servers.
  • Clarify which features and limitations apply to Windows vs. Linux LDAP servers.
  • Ensure terminology and instructions are platform-neutral where possible, or explicitly address both Windows and Linux/UNIX scenarios.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-file-access-logs.md ...articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-file-access-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. Instructions for setting SACLs for SMB shares are provided only for Windows, with step-by-step GUI instructions referencing Windows administration hosts and tools. There is no mention of PowerShell or CLI alternatives for Linux, nor are there Linux-based SMB management examples. The NFSv4.1 section refers users to a separate page for configuring access control lists, rather than providing direct instructions or examples inline. Windows tools and patterns (GUI, right-click, Properties, Security tab) are described in detail, while Linux equivalents are absent or deferred.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux-based instructions for managing SMB SACLs, such as using setfacl, smbcacls, or other relevant CLI tools.
  • Include PowerShell and CLI examples for both Windows and Linux where applicable.
  • Ensure that Linux tools and workflows are described with equal detail and prominence as Windows tools.
  • Add inline examples for NFSv4.1 ACL management on Linux, rather than referring to another page.
  • Where GUI steps are described for Windows, offer CLI or GUI alternatives for Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-cool-access.md ...main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-cool-access.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. The registration instructions for enabling cool access on Azure NetApp Files primarily use Azure PowerShell cmdlets (Register-AzProviderFeature, Get-AzProviderFeature), which are most commonly used on Windows and in PowerShell environments. While Azure CLI commands are mentioned, they are referenced only as an alternative and not shown in example blocks. The step-by-step instructions and screenshots focus on GUI actions typical of Windows environments (e.g., right-clicking in the portal), with no mention of Linux-specific workflows or CLI-based automation. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) examples, and the documentation does not address Linux user patterns or tools.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell for all registration and configuration steps, using bash syntax.
  • Include Linux shell (bash) command blocks for relevant operations, especially for users who prefer scripting and automation.
  • Add notes or sections describing how to perform these tasks on Linux/macOS environments, including any differences in prerequisites or tool installation.
  • Ensure screenshots and GUI instructions are complemented by CLI alternatives, making the documentation platform-agnostic.
  • Review terminology and instructions to avoid Windows-centric language (e.g., 'right-click'), or clarify that these steps apply equally in browser-based portals on all platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/modify-active-directory-connections.md ...re-netapp-files/modify-active-directory-connections.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing exclusively on Active Directory (a Windows-centric technology), referencing Windows tools and concepts (such as 'Active Directory Sites and Services', 'group policy', and 'NTFS permissions'), and omitting Linux-specific examples or equivalent LDAP/identity management tools. There are no Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, nor any mention of Linux-native patterns for managing AD or LDAP integration.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-centric examples for modifying LDAP/AD connections, such as using 'ldapmodify', 'sssd', or 'realmd' commands.
  • Reference Linux tools and configuration files (e.g., /etc/krb5.conf, /etc/sssd/sssd.conf) when discussing Kerberos and LDAP integration.
  • Provide parity in guidance for both Windows and Linux environments, including troubleshooting steps and security recommendations.
  • Clarify which steps or options are relevant for Linux-based clients or mixed environments, especially for NFS/Kerberos volumes.
  • Add links to documentation on integrating Azure NetApp Files with Linux identity management systems.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/monitor-volume-capacity.md ...articles/azure-netapp-files/monitor-volume-capacity.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation presents Windows examples and tools before Linux equivalents, with detailed instructions and screenshots for Windows (File Explorer, dir command) preceding Linux (df command). Windows-specific tools and patterns (File Explorer, dir) are highlighted, while Linux coverage is limited to a single command (df -h) and a brief note about du. REST API coverage mentions PowerShell specifically, reinforcing a Windows-centric approach.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows examples in parallel or alternate order to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • Expand Linux section to include additional relevant commands (e.g., lsblk, stat, lsof) and GUI tools (e.g., GNOME Disks, KDE Partition Manager) for parity with Windows File Explorer.
  • Provide screenshots of Linux GUI equivalents if available, similar to the Windows File Explorer screenshot.
  • Include Bash or shell script examples for automation, analogous to PowerShell references.
  • Clarify REST API usage with examples for both PowerShell and Bash/curl to ensure cross-platform accessibility.
  • Add troubleshooting tips or notes specific to Linux environments, matching the detail provided for Windows.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-smb-share-access-control-lists.md ...-netapp-files/manage-smb-share-access-control-lists.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exclusively describes Windows-based methods for managing SMB share ACLs in Azure NetApp Files, such as using Windows Explorer and Microsoft Management Console (MMC). No Linux or cross-platform tools or procedures are mentioned, and all examples and screenshots are Windows-centric. This creates a strong Windows bias and leaves Linux administrators without guidance.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions for viewing and modifying SMB share ACLs from Linux clients, such as using smbclient, smbcacls, or other Samba tools.
  • Include examples and screenshots for Linux-based workflows where possible.
  • Mention any limitations or differences in managing SMB ACLs from non-Windows platforms.
  • If management is only possible from Windows, explicitly state this and provide rationale, along with alternative recommendations for Linux users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/migrate-volumes.md ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/migrate-volumes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by primarily referencing PowerShell scripts and commands for migration workflows, mentioning PowerShell before Azure CLI, and providing no Linux/Unix shell or cross-platform examples. The only explicit script sample is a PowerShell script, and the registration steps default to PowerShell before mentioning Azure CLI as an alternative. There are no bash or Linux-native command examples, and no guidance for Linux users is provided.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Bash or Azure CLI script examples alongside PowerShell for all command-line steps, especially for feature registration and migration workflows.
  • Reference Azure CLI first or equally with PowerShell to avoid implying PowerShell is the primary or preferred method.
  • Include links to both PowerShell and Bash/CLI sample scripts for migration assistant workflows.
  • Explicitly state that all steps can be performed from Linux/macOS environments using Azure CLI or REST API, and provide any necessary prerequisites or notes for non-Windows users.
  • Where possible, use cross-platform language in instructions (e.g., 'run this command in your shell' instead of 'run this PowerShell command').
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/monitor-azure-netapp-files.md ...icles/azure-netapp-files/monitor-azure-netapp-files.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell and Windows clients before Linux equivalents. Examples for retrieving Activity log entries mention PowerShell and CLI, but do not specify Linux shell commands or tools. Capacity monitoring mentions both Windows and Linux clients, but does not provide parity in examples or instructions for Linux users. There is a lack of explicit Linux-centric guidance or examples throughout the page.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux shell (bash) examples alongside PowerShell for retrieving Activity log entries.
  • Mention and demonstrate use of Azure CLI on Linux, including installation and usage instructions.
  • Include Linux-specific tools and commands (e.g., df, du, iostat) for capacity monitoring and metrics collection.
  • Ensure that all monitoring instructions and examples are presented for both Windows and Linux environments, with equal detail and prominence.
  • Avoid listing Windows tools or PowerShell before Linux equivalents; present both together or alternate order.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions-smb.md ...-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on NTFS ACLs and references Microsoft Windows concepts and documentation, without mentioning Linux equivalents (such as POSIX ACLs) or providing Linux-based examples or tools. The terminology and linked resources are Windows-centric, and there is no guidance for users managing SMB permissions from Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Add a section explaining how SMB file permissions can be managed from Linux clients, including the use of tools like 'smbclient', 'setfacl', or 'getfacl' where applicable.
  • Provide examples of viewing and modifying SMB permissions from Linux systems.
  • Reference POSIX ACLs and clarify differences/similarities with NTFS ACLs in the context of Azure NetApp Files.
  • Include links to relevant Linux documentation or resources for managing SMB shares and permissions.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-protocols.md ...ure-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-protocols.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. SMB (Windows protocol) is described with official support for Windows and macOS, while Linux SMB (Samba) is mentioned as unofficially supported. Windows terminology (NTFS, SID, Active Directory) is used extensively and often before Linux equivalents. Examples and references to Windows tools and concepts (NTFS ACLs, SID translation, AD integration) are more detailed, while Linux/NFS examples are limited and lack parity in practical guidance (e.g., no Samba configuration example for Linux). The dual-protocol section emphasizes Active Directory and Windows attributes, with less detail on Linux identity management or integration patterns.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/Samba configuration examples for SMB access, including authentication and permission management.
  • Clarify support status and best practices for Linux SMB clients, including troubleshooting and limitations.
  • Balance terminology by introducing Linux/UNIX equivalents alongside Windows concepts (e.g., mention POSIX ACLs and id mapping when discussing NTFS ACLs and SID translation).
  • Include practical examples for both Windows and Linux clients when demonstrating protocol usage, such as mounting, authentication, and permission management.
  • Expand on Linux identity management integration (e.g., LDAP, Kerberos) in dual-protocol environments, not just Active Directory.
  • Ensure that references to tools and commands (e.g., rpcinfo) are paired with Windows and Linux equivalents where appropriate.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/performance-azure-vmware-solution-datastore.md ...p-files/performance-azure-vmware-solution-datastore.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates mild Windows bias. Windows tools and concepts (NTFS, volume shadow copies, Windows Server disk striping) are referenced alongside Linux equivalents, but Windows examples and links are often listed before Linux ones. There are explicit references to Windows Server commands and features, while Linux examples (such as LVM and xfs_freeze) are mentioned but not linked or elaborated. The 'Next steps' section lists Windows disk striping before Linux NFS mount options. There are no PowerShell-specific examples, but Windows tooling is more prominent than Linux alternatives.
Recommendations
  • Ensure Linux examples (e.g., LVM, xfs_freeze) are given equal prominence and linked to official documentation.
  • List Linux and Windows options together, alternating order or grouping by OS, rather than consistently listing Windows first.
  • Provide explicit Linux command-line examples for disk striping and snapshot operations, similar to the Windows Server references.
  • Include links to Linux documentation (e.g., LVM, xfs, NFS best practices) in the 'Next steps' section.
  • Clarify that both Windows and Linux guests are supported, and provide parity in recommendations and tooling references.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-permissions.md ...e-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-permissions.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. SMB share management is described exclusively via Windows tools (MMC console, Windows Explorer, 'net view'), with no mention of Linux or cross-platform alternatives for managing SMB shares or ACLs. All screenshots and examples for SMB features (access-based enumeration, nonbrowsable shares, SMB3 encryption) use Windows interfaces, and there are no Linux CLI or GUI equivalents shown. The documentation refers to Windows-specific patterns and tools before or instead of Linux ones, and does not provide parity in examples or instructions for Linux administrators managing SMB shares.
Recommendations
  • Include instructions and examples for managing SMB share permissions and ACLs from Linux clients, such as using 'smbclient', 'samba-tool', or 'net' commands.
  • Provide screenshots or CLI output from Linux tools for SMB features (e.g., access-based enumeration, nonbrowsable shares, SMB3 encryption) to demonstrate cross-platform management.
  • Mention and document how Linux users can discover, mount, and interact with SMB shares, including any limitations or differences compared to Windows.
  • Clarify whether features like nonbrowsable shares and access-based enumeration affect Linux clients, and how these behaviors manifest in Linux environments.
  • Add parity in troubleshooting and configuration guidance for both Windows and Linux administrators throughout the documentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/network-file-system-group-memberships.md ...-netapp-files/network-file-system-group-memberships.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing on Microsoft Active Directory as the LDAP implementation, using Windows group membership logic, and providing examples and screenshots exclusively from Windows tools (such as ldp.exe and Windows group member fields). There are no examples or references to Linux LDAP servers (e.g., OpenLDAP), Linux group management, or Linux command-line tools for querying group memberships, despite NFS being a cross-platform protocol commonly used in Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Include examples using Linux LDAP servers (such as OpenLDAP) and show how group memberships and supplemental groups are managed and queried in those environments.
  • Provide equivalent Linux command-line examples (e.g., using ldapsearch, getent group, id) for querying group memberships and GIDs.
  • Add screenshots or output samples from Linux tools to complement the Windows/Active Directory examples.
  • Clarify that Azure NetApp Files supports NFS clients from both Windows and Linux, and document any differences or considerations for Linux environments.
  • Mention Linux-specific schema attributes or group management patterns where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-introduction.md .../articles/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-introduction.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. When listing tools to create and manage snapshots, PowerShell is mentioned explicitly and linked, while Linux-native tools or shell examples are not provided. The order of tool presentation consistently puts PowerShell before alternatives, and there are no CLI/bash script examples for Linux users. References to scripting and automation link to Windows-centric resources (e.g., PowerShell modules, SQL Server T-SQL examples) without Linux parity. There is no mention of Linux-specific commands, nor are there examples using Linux shells or utilities.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux CLI/bash examples alongside PowerShell for all snapshot management operations.
  • Explicitly mention and link to Linux-native tools (e.g., Azure CLI usage in bash, REST API usage with curl) when listing management options.
  • Balance the order of tool presentation (e.g., alternate between Azure CLI and PowerShell, or present both together) to avoid Windows-first impression.
  • Include sample scripts for Linux environments, such as bash scripts using Azure CLI or REST API.
  • Reference Linux file recovery patterns (e.g., using NFS mounts, cp/mv commands) in restore sections.
  • Ensure that automation and scripting examples are available for both Windows and Linux platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/sever-message-block-support.md ...cles/azure-netapp-files/sever-message-block-support.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows terminology, tools, and use cases throughout. Windows-specific features, protocols, and administrative patterns are mentioned first or exclusively (e.g., NTFS semantics, Hyper-V, MS SQL Server, VSS, LMHOSTS, NTLMv2, Windows quota semantics, and references to Windows documentation). There is a lack of Linux-specific examples, tools, or guidance for configuring or accessing SMB shares from Linux clients. The only mention of Linux is in the context of 'UNIX extensions' and mapping Windows administrators to root, with no practical Linux usage or configuration details provided.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux client configuration examples for connecting to Azure NetApp Files SMB shares (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or GUI tools).
  • Include Linux-specific troubleshooting tips and references to relevant Linux documentation.
  • Balance references to Windows features with equivalent Linux/NFS features where possible, or clarify when features are Windows-only.
  • Provide guidance on dual-protocol (NFS/SMB) usage from Linux clients, including permission mapping and expected behaviors.
  • Mention Linux tools for managing SMB shares (e.g., Samba utilities) alongside Windows tools.
  • Clarify differences in file system semantics (e.g., delete behavior, file permissions) between Windows and Linux clients.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-data-encryption.md ...icles/azure-netapp-files/understand-data-encryption.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows/SMB encryption topics, referencing Windows-specific tools and security advisories, and providing configuration guidance primarily for Windows Active Directory environments. Examples and instructions for Linux or non-Windows environments are limited, especially regarding LDAP and SMB configuration, with little mention of Linux tools or workflows. NFS/Kerberos is covered, but lacks parity in example depth compared to SMB/Windows sections.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific configuration examples for SMB encryption (e.g., using Samba on Linux clients).
  • Provide guidance for configuring LDAP signing and encryption from Linux/Unix clients and servers, not just Windows/Active Directory.
  • Reference and link to relevant Linux documentation and tools (such as OpenLDAP, Samba, MIT Kerberos) alongside Windows equivalents.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux/NFS topics are given equal prominence to Windows/SMB topics.
  • Add troubleshooting and performance considerations for Linux clients, similar to those provided for Windows/SMB.
  • Clarify which features are available or behave differently on Linux vs. Windows clients, especially for encryption and authentication.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/troubleshoot-volumes.md ...in/articles/azure-netapp-files/troubleshoot-volumes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Troubleshooting guidance and error resolutions for SMB and dual-protocol volumes consistently reference Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS), Microsoft Entra Domain Services, and Windows-centric concepts (such as machine accounts, Kerberos errors, OU paths, and LDAP Signing). PowerShell commands are provided for Kerberos configuration, but equivalent Linux commands (e.g., using 'ldapmodify', 'kinit', or 'adcli') are not shown. In dual-protocol and NFS sections, Linux is referenced (e.g., restarting rpc-gssd), but Windows tools and terminology appear first or exclusively in many places. There are no explicit Linux-focused troubleshooting examples for NFS or LDAP, and Windows/AD terminology dominates the explanations.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and examples for NFS and LDAP errors, including common commands (e.g., 'kinit', 'adcli', 'ldapsearch', 'systemctl') and log file locations.
  • Provide parity by including Linux CLI commands alongside PowerShell commands for Kerberos and AD account management.
  • Where AD DS/Entra DS is referenced, clarify how equivalent configurations can be validated or troubleshot on Linux systems (e.g., using Samba, SSSD, or winbind).
  • Balance terminology by introducing Linux/UNIX concepts (such as /etc/krb5.conf, /etc/ldap.conf, nsswitch.conf) when discussing authentication and directory services.
  • Ensure that troubleshooting steps for dual-protocol volumes explicitly address both Windows and Linux client scenarios, not just Windows user mapping.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-guidelines-active-directory-domain-service-site.md ...rstand-guidelines-active-directory-domain-service-site.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently referencing Windows-centric tools (such as Active Directory Sites and Services), patterns, and terminology. Windows authentication scenarios and tools are described first and in greater detail, while Linux integration is only briefly mentioned (e.g., Kerberos authentication for Linux clients) without concrete configuration or troubleshooting examples. There are no Linux-specific tools or step-by-step examples for Linux administrators, and all sample configurations and screenshots use Windows utilities.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific configuration examples for AD DS integration, such as using 'realmd', 'sssd', or 'krb5.conf' for Kerberos authentication.
  • Provide step-by-step instructions for Linux clients to join AD DS domains and access Azure NetApp Files SMB shares, including troubleshooting common Linux issues.
  • Add screenshots or CLI examples using Linux tools (e.g., 'realm', 'kinit', 'ldapsearch') alongside Windows GUI screenshots.
  • Mention Linux equivalents for network and DNS troubleshooting (e.g., using 'dig', 'nslookup', 'ping', 'tcpdump' on Linux).
  • Clarify any differences or additional requirements for Linux clients in AD DS site topology and replication scenarios.
  • Ensure parity in describing authentication scenarios, giving equal detail to Linux and Windows client integration.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 10 of 36 Next →