Azure Netapp Files

252
Total Pages
149
Linux-Friendly Pages
103
Pages with Bias
40.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

896 issues found
Showing 251-275 of 896 flagged pages
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-volume-languages.md ...cles/azure-netapp-files/understand-volume-languages.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows tools (Explorer, PowerShell, CMD, Notepad, Notepad++) are mentioned and illustrated first or more extensively than Linux equivalents. PowerShell and Windows Terminal are described in detail for encoding and font management, while Linux alternatives (such as GNOME Terminal, xterm, or Linux text editors) are not discussed. Examples for file encoding conversion and inspection use PowerShell cmdlets before Linux commands, and Windows-specific troubleshooting steps (like changing fonts in PowerShell ISE) are provided, whereas Linux troubleshooting is less detailed. Some Linux examples are present, but often follow Windows instructions or are less comprehensive.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-first examples for encoding inspection and conversion, such as using 'file', 'iconv', 'vim', or 'nano' for file encoding and display.
  • Include screenshots and troubleshooting steps for Linux terminals (e.g., GNOME Terminal, xterm, Konsole) showing font and encoding settings.
  • Describe how to change locale and encoding settings on Linux systems, including configuration files and environment variables.
  • Offer parity in file management examples by showing Linux commands (e.g., 'ls', 'stat', 'cat') before or alongside Windows commands.
  • Mention Linux text editors (vim, nano, gedit) and their encoding options, similar to the coverage of Notepad/Notepad++.
  • Add troubleshooting tips for Linux users encountering display or encoding issues, such as installing additional fonts or configuring terminal settings.
  • Balance the coverage of Windows and Linux tools, ensuring that Linux users have clear, actionable guidance equivalent to Windows users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-path-lengths.md ...articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-path-lengths.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by providing detailed instructions and screenshots for extending SMB path limits specifically on Windows, referencing Windows registry and Group Policy, and focusing on Windows path length limitations and workarounds. Windows tools and patterns (such as drive letter mapping, UNC paths, and registry edits) are described in depth, while equivalent Linux SMB client configuration, troubleshooting, or examples are missing. Linux/NFS examples are present for path length and character encoding, but SMB guidance is almost exclusively Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Add SMB path length configuration and troubleshooting steps for Linux clients (e.g., using mount.cifs options, fstab, or relevant Samba client settings).
  • Include Linux-based examples for accessing long SMB paths, such as using smbclient, mount.cifs, or gvfs, and discuss their limitations.
  • Provide parity in error message screenshots and handling for Linux SMB clients, not just Windows dialogs.
  • Reference Linux tools and commands for querying and managing SMB path lengths (e.g., stat, getconf, or smbclient output).
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows approaches are introduced together, rather than Windows-first.
  • Mention cross-platform considerations for MacOS clients where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/use-dfs-n-and-dfs-root-consolidation-with-azure-netapp-files.md ...s-n-and-dfs-root-consolidation-with-azure-netapp-files.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is heavily Windows-centric, focusing exclusively on Windows Server DFS Namespaces, Windows GUI tools, and PowerShell commands. All examples and instructions use Windows tools and terminology, with no mention of Linux equivalents, cross-platform alternatives, or guidance for non-Windows environments. The documentation assumes the reader is operating in a Windows Active Directory domain and using Windows DNS servers, with no consideration for Linux-based SMB servers, Samba, or non-Windows DNS management.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state that DFS Namespaces is a Windows-only technology and clarify its platform limitations early in the documentation.
  • Provide guidance or references for Linux/Samba users who may want similar namespace virtualization or migration capabilities, such as using Samba's DFS support.
  • Include alternative instructions or links for managing SMB shares, DNS, and file server migrations in Linux environments.
  • Add a comparison table or section outlining what features are available on Windows vs. Linux, and any cross-platform interoperability considerations.
  • Mention that Azure NetApp Files SMB shares can be accessed from Linux clients, and provide basic mounting instructions for Linux (e.g., using mount.cifs), even if DFS-N management remains Windows-only.
  • Where possible, reference open-source or cross-platform tools for DNS management, file share migration, and namespace abstraction.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/whats-new.md ...ocs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/whats-new.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure NetApp Files 'What's New' shows a moderate Windows bias. Windows-centric features (Active Directory, SMB, Windows Server, Windows File Explorer, FSLogix, Citrix App Layering, Azure VMware Solution) are frequently mentioned, often with detailed explanations and use cases. Windows tools and patterns (SMB, NTFS, Windows File Explorer) are referenced more often and sometimes before Linux/NFS equivalents. Some features (e.g., Access-based Enumeration, Non-browsable shares, SMB Continuous Availability) are described primarily in Windows terms, with limited or no Linux/NFS examples. However, there are also Linux-focused enhancements (NFS, LDAP, FreeIPA, OpenLDAP, AzAcSnap), and dual-protocol support is highlighted, showing some effort toward parity.
Recommendations
  • For every Windows/SMB example or feature, provide equivalent Linux/NFS examples and use cases.
  • When describing features (e.g., Access-based Enumeration, Non-browsable shares), include instructions and expected behavior for Linux/NFS clients.
  • Avoid presenting Windows tools or workflows first; alternate or parallelize Windows and Linux examples.
  • Expand documentation for Linux identity and authentication integrations (e.g., FreeIPA, OpenLDAP) with practical configuration steps.
  • Ensure that troubleshooting and reporting features (e.g., quota reporting, file access logs) include Linux/NFS usage scenarios.
  • Where features are Windows-only, clearly state this and suggest Linux alternatives if available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-sdk-cli.md ...icles/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-sdk-cli.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by highlighting PowerShell as a primary CLI tool alongside Azure CLI, without mentioning Linux-native alternatives or providing Linux-specific guidance. The CLI tools section lists Azure CLI and PowerShell, but omits any reference to Bash, shell scripting, or Linux package installation. No Linux-specific examples or tools are provided, and PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, which is cross-platform.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide installation instructions for both Windows and Linux.
  • Include Linux/Bash shell examples for common tasks, or link to such examples.
  • Clarify that PowerShell Core is available on Linux, if relevant, and provide installation instructions for Linux users.
  • Add a section or table row for Linux-native tools or scripting patterns (e.g., Bash, curl, jq) where applicable.
  • Ensure that examples and guidance are not Windows-centric by default, and provide parity for Linux users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-set-up-capacity-pool.md ...etapp-files/azure-netapp-files-set-up-capacity-pool.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by mentioning PowerShell and its module update instructions before any Linux equivalents, and by omitting explicit Linux or Bash examples for command-line operations. The Azure CLI is referenced generically, but only PowerShell is called out with specific update instructions and a link to the Update-Module command, which is Windows-centric. There are no Linux-specific instructions, nor are Linux tools or shell commands (e.g., Bash) mentioned.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit instructions for updating the Azure CLI on Linux/macOS, including common shell commands (e.g., apt, yum, brew).
  • Provide Bash or shell examples alongside PowerShell for command-line operations.
  • Include links to Linux-specific documentation for Azure CLI and module management.
  • Ensure that references to PowerShell are balanced with equivalent Linux/Bash guidance, especially in 'Before you begin' sections.
  • Consider reordering instructions so that cross-platform tools (Azure CLI, REST API) are mentioned before platform-specific tools (PowerShell).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/cross-zone-region-replication-configure.md ...etapp-files/cross-zone-region-replication-configure.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by providing Azure PowerShell examples for feature registration and status checking, mentioning PowerShell before Azure CLI, and omitting explicit Linux/bash command examples. The registration steps are shown with PowerShell syntax, and only a brief reference to Azure CLI is given, without concrete CLI command examples. No Linux-specific guidance or parity is provided for users who may prefer bash or CLI workflows.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI (bash) command examples alongside PowerShell for all registration and management steps.
  • Ensure that CLI examples are given equal prominence and detail as PowerShell examples, not just referenced.
  • Add notes or sections addressing Linux/macOS users, including any platform-specific considerations.
  • Review future documentation to avoid defaulting to Windows tools or patterns, and strive for cross-platform parity in instructions and screenshots.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/disable-showmount.md .../main/articles/azure-netapp-files/disable-showmount.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for feature registration and management, mentioning Azure CLI only secondarily and without explicit command examples. There are no Linux-specific instructions or examples, and the workflow assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tools and patterns.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Azure CLI command examples for all steps, with syntax and expected output.
  • Clarify that both PowerShell and CLI are cross-platform, and provide guidance for Linux/macOS users.
  • Include instructions for running CLI commands on Linux, such as using the Azure Cloud Shell or installing the Azure CLI.
  • Ensure screenshots and UI references are not Windows-specific, or provide notes for Linux users if differences exist.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-protocols.md ...ure-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-protocols.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. SMB/Windows concepts and terminology are introduced before Linux/NFS equivalents, and Windows tools (Active Directory, NTFS ACLs, SID translation) are referenced as defaults or standards. Official support is stated for Windows and macOS SMB clients, while Linux SMB clients are described as unofficially supported. There are references to Windows-specific features and fallback authentication mechanisms (NTLM), with less detail or parity for Linux/Samba. Examples and operational details (such as commands) are sparse for Linux, with only a single rpcinfo command shown for NFS, and no Linux/Samba configuration or troubleshooting examples. The documentation assumes Active Directory as the central identity provider, with LDAP mentioned only as an alternative for NFS.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/Samba configuration and troubleshooting examples for SMB access, including common mount commands and error scenarios.
  • Clarify support status and provide guidance for Linux SMB clients, including best practices and limitations.
  • Present NFS and SMB protocols in parallel, avoiding Windows-first ordering and terminology.
  • Include Linux tools and patterns (e.g., idmapd, nfs-utils, samba-client) alongside Windows tools.
  • Expand on LDAP integration for both NFS and SMB, not just as an alternative to Active Directory.
  • Add Linux-specific security and permission management examples (e.g., setfacl, getfacl, POSIX ACLs) for dual-protocol volumes.
  • Explicitly mention and support heterogeneous environments, including those without Active Directory.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-cool-access.md ...main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-cool-access.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by primarily featuring Azure PowerShell commands for feature registration and status checks, with Azure CLI (cross-platform) only mentioned as an alternative and without explicit examples. The UI instructions reference Windows-style interactions (right-click), and there are no Linux-specific command-line examples or screenshots. This prioritizes Windows tools and patterns, potentially making it less accessible for Linux users or those who prefer CLI workflows.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell for all registration and status check steps, including sample output.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and suitable for Linux/macOS users.
  • Include instructions for performing equivalent actions via CLI, not just GUI (right-click), especially for enabling cool access on pools and volumes.
  • Add screenshots or terminal output examples from Linux environments where relevant.
  • Avoid Windows-centric terminology (e.g., 'right-click') or supplement with CLI alternatives for users on non-Windows platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/monitor-azure-netapp-files.md ...icles/azure-netapp-files/monitor-azure-netapp-files.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. In the 'Azure Activity log' section, PowerShell is mentioned explicitly as a way to retrieve logs, while Linux equivalents (such as Bash or Azure CLI on Linux) are not referenced or exemplified. The order of mention ('PowerShell and CLI') places the Windows tool first. In the 'Capacity utilization monitoring' section, Windows clients are mentioned before Linux clients, and no specific Linux commands or examples are provided. There are no explicit Linux-centric tools or examples throughout the page.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux/Bash/Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell for retrieving Activity logs.
  • Mention Azure CLI as a cross-platform tool and provide sample commands for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • In 'Capacity utilization monitoring', offer concrete examples for checking capacity on both Windows and Linux clients (e.g., using df, du, or other Linux utilities).
  • Ensure that references to client platforms alternate or are presented in parallel (e.g., 'Windows and Linux clients') rather than listing Windows first.
  • Include links to Linux-specific documentation or troubleshooting guides where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/includes/smb-continuous-availability.md ...e-netapp-files/includes/smb-continuous-availability.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by focusing exclusively on Windows workloads and tools. All examples and supported scenarios (Citrix, FSLogix, MSIX app attach, SQL Server) are Windows-centric, with explicit statements that Linux SQL Server is not supported. There are no Linux-specific examples, guidance, or mention of equivalent Linux tools or patterns. Active Directory and Windows security privileges are discussed, but no Linux authentication or privilege management alternatives are provided.
Recommendations
  • Clearly state platform limitations at the beginning of the documentation to set expectations for Linux users.
  • If possible, provide information about roadmap or alternatives for Linux support, or link to relevant Linux documentation.
  • Include a section comparing Windows and Linux support for SMB Continuous Availability, highlighting feature gaps and workarounds.
  • Add Linux-specific examples or guidance where applicable, or explicitly note the absence of support to avoid confusion.
  • Mention Linux authentication and privilege management approaches if/when Linux support becomes available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/troubleshoot-volumes.md ...in/articles/azure-netapp-files/troubleshoot-volumes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. Troubleshooting steps and error resolutions for SMB and dual-protocol volumes are heavily oriented toward Active Directory (AD DS), Microsoft Entra Domain Services, and Windows-centric concepts. PowerShell commands are provided for Kerberos configuration, but equivalent Linux commands (such as using 'ldapmodify' or 'kinit' for account settings) are not included. The documentation discusses mapping UNIX users to Windows users and POSIX attributes, but does not provide concrete Linux-side examples or tools for managing these mappings. In general, Windows tools and terminology (AD, PowerShell, OU paths, LDAP Signing) are mentioned first or exclusively, while Linux/NFS troubleshooting is less detailed and lacks parity in command-line examples.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and examples, such as using 'ldapmodify', 'realm', or 'adcli' for Kerberos and LDAP configuration.
  • Provide Linux command equivalents for PowerShell commands, especially for managing Kerberos encryption types and machine accounts.
  • Include examples of configuring POSIX attributes on Linux and mapping users/groups between Linux and AD.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux/NFS troubleshooting is given equal prominence to Windows/SMB issues.
  • Reference Linux tools (such as 'sssd', 'krb5.conf', 'nsswitch.conf', 'systemctl') alongside Windows tools when discussing authentication and network troubleshooting.
  • Where AD/PowerShell is mentioned, also mention how similar tasks can be accomplished on Linux, and link to relevant documentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-cmd-ref-configure.md ...icles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-cmd-ref-configure.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by providing configuration examples and required values that are either Windows-centric or omit explicit Linux guidance. For instance, the Microsoft SQL Server section uses Windows-style file paths (e.g., 'C:\MSSQL_BKP\') and connection strings, but does not mention Linux alternatives. There are no explicit Linux shell or environment examples, and authentication file creation is described using Azure Cloud Shell, which is cross-platform but lacks Linux-specific context. The documentation does not provide parity for Linux environments, especially for SQL Server or general configuration file locations.
Recommendations
  • Include explicit Linux examples for configuration, such as file paths using Linux conventions (e.g., '/var/opt/mssql_bkp/').
  • For Microsoft SQL Server, provide connection string and metaDataFileLocation examples for Linux installations.
  • Clarify that AzAcSnap and its configuration are supported on both Windows and Linux, and highlight any OS-specific considerations.
  • Mention Linux tools and commands where relevant, such as using bash, ssh, or Linux-based authentication file creation.
  • Ensure that all database types (Oracle, Db2, SAP HANA, SQL Server) have examples for both Windows and Linux environments, especially where file paths, shell commands, or authentication methods differ.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-government.md ...b/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-government.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by providing detailed PowerShell instructions and listing PowerShell access as a primary method for connecting to Azure Government. Windows tools (PowerShell, Microsoft Graph PowerShell, Entra PowerShell) are described in detail, while Linux-native tools and workflows (such as Bash scripting, curl, or other CLI utilities) are not mentioned. The examples and connection instructions prioritize Windows-centric approaches, with no explicit Linux or cross-platform alternatives provided.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific examples for connecting to Azure Government, such as using Bash, curl, or other common Linux utilities.
  • Provide parity in CLI instructions, ensuring that examples work seamlessly on both Windows and Linux (e.g., Azure CLI commands in Bash).
  • Add a section describing how to access Azure NetApp Files from Linux environments, including authentication and endpoint configuration.
  • Mention cross-platform tools and clarify which instructions apply to both Windows and Linux, or provide separate instructions where necessary.
  • Ensure REST API examples include sample requests using curl or similar Linux-native tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/create-volumes-dual-protocol.md ...les/azure-netapp-files/create-volumes-dual-protocol.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a moderate Windows bias. Windows tools and workflows (Active Directory Users and Computers MMC snap-in, Attribute Editor, Windows File Browser, net view command) are referenced exclusively or before Linux equivalents. The section on managing LDAP POSIX attributes provides only Windows-based instructions and screenshots, with no mention of how to perform equivalent tasks on Linux systems. There are no examples or guidance for configuring LDAP attributes or managing dual-protocol volumes using Linux tools (e.g., ldapmodify, phpldapadmin, or command-line utilities).
Recommendations
  • Add instructions and examples for managing LDAP POSIX attributes using Linux tools (such as ldapmodify, ldapadd, or phpldapadmin).
  • Include screenshots or walkthroughs for Linux-based workflows where Windows tools are currently shown (e.g., editing LDAP attributes, viewing POSIX attributes).
  • When referencing commands or tools (e.g., 'net view'), provide Linux equivalents (such as 'smbclient -L') and clarify cross-platform differences.
  • Ensure that configuration steps for NFS and dual-protocol volumes include both Windows and Linux perspectives, especially for administrative tasks.
  • Present Windows and Linux options in parallel, rather than Windows-first, to improve parity and accessibility for Linux administrators.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-ldap-extended-groups.md ...s/azure-netapp-files/configure-ldap-extended-groups.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is heavily focused on Windows-centric tools and patterns, such as Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS), Microsoft Entra Domain Services, and Windows-specific management interfaces (MMC snap-in, Multi-valued String Editor, Attribute Editor). Linux alternatives (e.g., OpenLDAP) are explicitly not supported, and Linux-specific configuration steps are only briefly mentioned and deferred to other documents. Windows tools and concepts are presented first and in detail, while Linux examples and tools are minimal or absent.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux/OpenLDAP examples and clarify which steps can be performed with Linux LDAP servers where possible.
  • Include screenshots and instructions for managing POSIX attributes using Linux tools (e.g., ldapmodify, phpldapadmin).
  • Offer troubleshooting guidance for Linux clients and LDAP servers, not just Windows AD environments.
  • Clearly state the limitations regarding non-Windows LDAP servers, and suggest workarounds or alternatives for Linux environments.
  • Balance the presentation order so that Linux client configuration steps are given equal prominence to Windows/AD steps.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-smb.md ...-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All examples, tools, and troubleshooting steps reference Windows environments, utilities, and protocols (e.g., MMC, Active Directory Users and Computers, Windows Server DFS, Windows Update KBs). There are no examples or guidance for Linux or non-Windows clients, and Linux tools or mounting procedures are not mentioned. The documentation assumes a Windows-centric audience and omits cross-platform considerations.
Recommendations
  • Add examples and instructions for accessing Azure NetApp Files SMB shares from Linux clients (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or gvfs).
  • Include troubleshooting steps and best practices for Linux environments, such as clock synchronization and credential management.
  • Mention Linux-compatible tools for managing SMB shares, sessions, and open files (e.g., smbstatus, cifs-utils).
  • When referencing features like DFS or MMC, note Linux alternatives or clarify cross-platform limitations.
  • Provide parity in documentation by including both Windows and Linux procedures side-by-side where relevant.
  • Explicitly state any limitations or differences in SMB support for Linux clients, if applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-default-individual-user-group-quotas.md ...p-files/manage-default-individual-user-group-quotas.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by providing specific instructions and identifier formats for SMB (Windows) volumes and dual-protocol volumes using SMB, while NFS (Linux/UNIX) instructions are less detailed and lack example formats. SMB-related quota target formats (Windows SIDs) are described in detail, but equivalent Linux user/group identifiers (UID/GID) are not exemplified. There are no command-line examples for Linux/UNIX environments, and the portal instructions do not clarify parity for Linux administrators.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit examples of Linux/UNIX user and group identifiers (UID/GID) for NFS volumes, similar to the detailed SID format for SMB.
  • Include command-line or CLI examples for managing quotas on NFS volumes, using Linux tools or Azure CLI, if available.
  • Ensure that instructions for both SMB (Windows) and NFS (Linux/UNIX) are given equal prominence and detail, possibly by separating sections or providing parallel examples.
  • Clarify any differences in quota management between Windows and Linux environments, and offer troubleshooting steps relevant to both platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol.md ...-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing primarily on Microsoft Active Directory as the LDAP server, mentioning Windows-specific tools and patterns (such as nslookup with Windows-style output), and providing examples and configuration details for Windows environments before Linux equivalents. Linux/UNIX alternatives (FreeIPA, OpenLDAP, Red Hat Directory Server) are mentioned only in a note and not elaborated upon. There are no Linux command-line examples (e.g., ldapsearch, getent, or configuration steps for Linux LDAP clients), and the only DNS query example is Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Provide equal coverage and examples for Linux/UNIX LDAP servers (FreeIPA, OpenLDAP, Red Hat Directory Server), including configuration steps and supported features.
  • Include Linux command-line examples for DNS SRV record lookups (e.g., dig, host) alongside Windows nslookup.
  • Add sample LDAP queries using common Linux tools (ldapsearch, getent) to demonstrate usage in non-Windows environments.
  • Clarify support and configuration differences between Windows and Linux LDAP servers in Azure NetApp Files.
  • Present Linux/UNIX options and examples before or alongside Windows options to avoid 'windows_first' bias.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/nfs-access-control-lists.md ...rticles/azure-netapp-files/nfs-access-control-lists.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows concepts and documentation links before Linux equivalents, using Windows-centric terminology (such as NTFS permissions and Windows user mapping), and linking to Windows documentation for ACLs and ACEs. While the technical examples and commands are Linux/NFS-focused, the conceptual framing and cross-references prioritize Windows tools and patterns, potentially making the content less approachable for Linux-first administrators.
Recommendations
  • Replace or supplement Windows documentation links (e.g., for ACLs and ACEs) with links to Linux/NFS-specific resources, such as man pages or relevant RFCs.
  • Introduce Linux/NFS terminology and concepts before Windows/NTFS equivalents to better align with the primary audience for NFS documentation.
  • Provide a brief comparison table or section outlining differences and similarities between NFSv4.x ACLs and NTFS ACLs, making it clear which features are unique to each platform.
  • Ensure that troubleshooting and configuration steps reference Linux tools and logs first, with Windows/SMB mapping as a secondary consideration.
  • Review cross-references and 'Next steps' sections to ensure Linux/NFS resources are prioritized and clearly presented.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/tools-reference.md ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/tools-reference.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page lists several tools for Azure NetApp Files, but only one tool (ANFHealthCheck) specifically mentions PowerShell, with no equivalent Linux shell or cross-platform alternative provided. There is no mention of Linux-native tools, nor are examples given for Linux environments. The focus on PowerShell and lack of Linux parity suggests a Windows bias.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux shell (bash) or cross-platform alternatives for tools like ANFHealthCheck, or clarify if they can run on Linux using PowerShell Core.
  • Include examples or references to Linux-compatible monitoring and automation solutions (e.g., Azure CLI, bash scripts, Ansible modules).
  • Explicitly state platform compatibility for each tool, and ensure parity in documentation for both Windows and Linux users.
  • Highlight any existing Linux-native or cross-platform tools for Azure NetApp Files, or suggest community-supported alternatives.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-guidelines-active-directory-domain-service-site.md ...rstand-guidelines-active-directory-domain-service-site.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently referencing Windows-centric tools (such as 'Active Directory Sites and Services'), patterns, and terminology. Windows authentication scenarios and tools are described first and in greater detail, while Linux scenarios (Kerberos authentication for Linux clients) are mentioned briefly and without example. All configuration walkthroughs and screenshots use Windows GUI tools, with no Linux equivalents or CLI alternatives provided.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-focused configuration examples, such as using Samba or sssd for AD DS integration, and demonstrate Kerberos setup for Linux clients.
  • Provide CLI-based instructions (e.g., PowerShell, Windows CMD, and Linux shell commands) for tasks currently described only with Windows GUI tools.
  • Add parity in troubleshooting and validation steps for Linux clients, such as using 'kinit', 'ldapsearch', or 'realm' commands.
  • Reference Linux documentation and tools (e.g., Systemd-timesyncd, chrony, ntpd for time source configuration) alongside Windows equivalents.
  • Ensure authentication scenarios for Linux are described with equal detail, including network, DNS, and site topology considerations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-cmd-ref-backup.md ...articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-cmd-ref-backup.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias in several ways. In the section on flushing file buffers, Windows-specific instructions and tools (CMD, PowerShell, Task Scheduler) are described in detail, including step-by-step guidance and code examples. These Windows instructions are presented before the Linux equivalent, which is only briefly mentioned as 'using the Linux sync command' without further explanation or examples. The Windows section also includes multiple elevation methods, while Linux is not given similar depth or parity.
Recommendations
  • Provide equally detailed instructions for Linux, including example commands for flushing I/O buffers (e.g., using 'sync'), and mention any required privileges (such as sudo).
  • Include automation examples for Linux, such as using cron jobs or systemd timers, to match the Windows Task Scheduler guidance.
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, or start with Linux if it is the more common platform for the target audience.
  • Add troubleshooting tips for Linux environments, similar to the privilege notes given for Windows.
  • Ensure that examples and explanations for both platforms are balanced in depth and clarity.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-configure-database.md ...cles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-configure-database.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides detailed Linux/Unix shell examples for SAP HANA, Oracle, and IBM Db2, but for Microsoft SQL Server, only Windows-specific instructions and PowerShell-style commands are given. The SQL Server section uses Windows paths and executable syntax (e.g., .\azacsnap.exe), and does not mention or provide examples for running AzAcSnap on Linux, despite SQL Server's support for Linux. Windows tools and patterns are mentioned exclusively for SQL Server, and the documentation assumes a Windows environment for this database, omitting Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit instructions and examples for configuring AzAcSnap with Microsoft SQL Server on Linux, including Linux shell commands and paths.
  • Document the installation and usage of AzAcSnap on Linux for SQL Server, including any required permissions, environment variables, and test commands.
  • Ensure that all database sections (including SQL Server) provide both Windows and Linux examples where applicable, and avoid assuming Windows as the default platform.
  • Mention cross-platform compatibility for AzAcSnap and SQL Server, and clarify any platform-specific limitations or requirements.
  • Where Windows tools or patterns are referenced, provide equivalent Linux alternatives and document their usage.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 11 of 36 Next →