Azure Netapp Files

252
Total Pages
149
Linux-Friendly Pages
103
Pages with Bias
40.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

896 issues found
Showing 701-725 of 896 flagged pages
Azure Netapp Files Benefits of using Azure NetApp Files for SQL Server deployment ...es/solutions-benefits-azure-netapp-files-sql-server.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on SQL Server deployment, which is traditionally a Windows-centric workload. There are no references to Linux or cross-platform SQL Server deployments, nor are there examples or guidance for Linux-based SQL Server instances. All instance types, performance metrics, and benchmarking tools are discussed in the context of SQL Server on Azure VMs, implicitly assuming a Windows environment. No mention is made of Linux tools, patterns, or deployment scenarios.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention that SQL Server is available on Linux and clarify whether Azure NetApp Files supports Linux-based SQL Server deployments.
  • Include examples or performance data for SQL Server running on Linux VMs, if supported.
  • Reference Linux-compatible benchmarking tools and provide guidance for Linux users where applicable.
  • Add a section or note about cross-platform support and any differences in deployment or performance for Linux versus Windows SQL Server instances.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand data encryption in Azure NetApp Files ...icles/azure-netapp-files/understand-data-encryption.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a moderate Windows bias, especially in sections discussing SMB encryption, UNC hardening, and LDAP signing, where Windows tools and terminology (Active Directory, Group Policy, UNC paths) are referenced first and in detail. Windows-specific features and security advisories are highlighted, while Linux/macOS equivalents (such as Samba for SMB or OpenLDAP for LDAP) are not mentioned or provided as examples. There are no explicit Linux/macOS command-line examples or configuration references, and the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-centric patterns.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux/macOS-specific examples for SMB encryption (e.g., Samba configuration for SMB3 encryption).
  • Provide guidance for configuring NFS Kerberos and LDAP encryption on Linux clients and servers (e.g., using MIT Kerberos, OpenLDAP, sssd, etc.).
  • Reference cross-platform tools and configuration steps, not just Windows Group Policy or Active Directory.
  • Add parity in troubleshooting and performance sections for Linux/macOS environments.
  • Clarify which features are available and supported for non-Windows clients, and note any limitations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand guidelines for Active Directory Domain Services site design and planning ...rstand-guidelines-active-directory-domain-service-site.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: Windows authentication scenarios and tools (Active Directory Sites and Services) are described first and in detail, with Linux scenarios mentioned only briefly. All configuration examples and screenshots use Windows-only tools, and there are no equivalent Linux/macOS instructions or examples for managing AD DS site topology. The documentation references Windows-specific utilities and guidance, and omits Linux-native approaches for AD DS integration and troubleshooting.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/macOS equivalent instructions for AD DS site topology management, such as using Samba tools or relevant command-line utilities.
  • Include examples and screenshots for Linux-based AD DS integration and troubleshooting, e.g., using 'samba-tool', 'ldapsearch', or Kerberos configuration on Linux.
  • Mention and link to cross-platform tools and documentation where possible, not just Windows Server or Windows utilities.
  • Present authentication scenarios for Linux and Windows clients with equal detail, including step-by-step guidance for Linux Kerberos/LDAP integration.
  • Add troubleshooting guidance for Linux/macOS clients, not just Windows.
  • Avoid presenting Windows tools and patterns first; alternate or parallel presentation for both platforms is preferable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand volume languages in Azure NetApp Files ...cles/azure-netapp-files/understand-volume-languages.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First Minor Example Order
Summary
The documentation provides a generally balanced overview of character encoding across platforms, but there is a notable Windows bias in several sections. Windows tools (Explorer, Notepad, Notepad++, PowerShell, CMD, PowerShell ISE, Windows Terminal) are mentioned and illustrated more frequently and in greater detail than Linux/macOS equivalents. Windows-specific troubleshooting steps, font settings, and encoding conversions are described before or instead of Linux alternatives. PowerShell examples and commands are prominent, while Linux commands (like iconv, file) are present but less emphasized. Some sections, such as file encoding conversion and font troubleshooting, focus heavily on Windows utilities, with Linux guidance provided later or in less detail.
Recommendations
  • Add more Linux/macOS-specific examples and screenshots, especially for encoding conversion, font troubleshooting, and viewing file encodings.
  • Present Linux and Windows tools in parallel (e.g., show both PowerShell and Bash/iconv/file commands for encoding conversion).
  • Include macOS-specific notes where relevant (e.g., default encoding, terminal font settings).
  • Balance the order of examples so Linux/macOS are not always presented after Windows.
  • Expand troubleshooting guidance for Linux/macOS clients (e.g., font issues, locale settings, encoding errors).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand Azure NetApp Files control plane security .../articles/azure-netapp-files/control-plane-security.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation consistently references Azure management interfaces as 'APIs, PowerShell, CLI, or the Azure portal', listing PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) before CLI and omitting explicit mention of Linux-native tools or shell scripting. No Linux-specific examples, commands, or patterns are provided, and there is no discussion of Bash, Azure CLI usage on Linux, or cross-platform scripting. The documentation implicitly prioritizes Windows/PowerShell by order and omission.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention Azure CLI and Bash scripting as first-class management options alongside PowerShell.
  • Provide example commands for both PowerShell and Azure CLI (with Bash syntax) for common control plane operations.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and can be used on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Include links to Azure CLI documentation and Linux setup guides.
  • Avoid listing PowerShell before CLI unless contextually justified; consider 'CLI, PowerShell, APIs, or the Azure portal' or 'Azure CLI (cross-platform), PowerShell (Windows), APIs, or the Azure portal'.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files azure-netapp-files/create-active-directory-connections.md ...les/azure-netapp-files/includes/netlogon-april-2023.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation focuses exclusively on the impact of a Windows Update (April 2023) and Netlogon Secure Channel changes, with no mention of Linux or cross-platform considerations. Only Windows-specific terminology and update references are provided, and there are no examples or guidance for Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Include information about how (or if) Linux-based clients or Samba implementations are affected by the Netlogon protocol changes.
  • Provide equivalent guidance or examples for managing Active Directory connections from Linux systems.
  • Clarify whether the update has any impact on non-Windows environments and, if not, explicitly state this for transparency.
  • Add links or references to Linux/Samba documentation where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Requirements and considerations for Azure NetApp Files large volumes ...app-files/large-volumes-requirements-considerations.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently presenting Azure PowerShell commands first and in detail for feature registration and status checking, with Azure CLI commands mentioned only as alternatives and without explicit examples. No Linux-specific tools or shell commands are provided, and the command-line instructions are primarily tailored to Windows/PowerShell users.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell, not just references.
  • Include Linux shell (bash) usage patterns for feature registration and status checking.
  • Ensure command-line instructions are presented in a platform-neutral manner or alternate between Windows and Linux examples.
  • Add notes or sections for Linux users, clarifying any differences in procedure or environment.
  • Review other configuration steps for implicit Windows assumptions and offer Linux equivalents.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Integration FAQs for Azure NetApp Files ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-integration.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias. In the section about mounting Azure NetApp Files volumes on AVS VMs, Windows is mentioned first for both NFS and SMB, and only Windows VMs are referenced for SMB shares. There are no explicit Linux examples for SMB, and Linux is only mentioned in passing for NFS mounts, with no details or parity in instructions/examples.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit examples or instructions for mounting Azure NetApp Files SMB shares on Linux VMs, if supported.
  • Ensure that Linux is mentioned equally and not only after Windows, especially in lists or examples.
  • Where possible, offer parallel instructions for both Windows and Linux environments for common integration scenarios.
  • Clarify any limitations or differences in support between Windows and Linux for NFS and SMB mounts.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Release Notes for Azure Application Consistent Snapshot tool for Azure NetApp Files | Microsoft Docs .../articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-release-notes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page provides download links and release notes for both Linux and Windows versions of AzAcSnap, but there is a noticeable Windows-first bias in feature announcements and examples. Features for Microsoft SQL Server on Windows are highlighted before Linux equivalents, and some features are described as 'only available for Microsoft SQL Server', implicitly Windows-centric. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples, nor are Linux tools or patterns mentioned. While binaries for both platforms are provided, the documentation lacks parity in example usage and feature coverage for Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Include explicit Linux usage examples and configuration patterns alongside Windows examples.
  • When announcing features, clarify platform parity and availability (e.g., 'available for both Linux and Windows' or note any differences).
  • Provide examples for Linux-specific database platforms (e.g., Oracle, SAP HANA) where relevant.
  • Mention Linux tools, commands, or troubleshooting steps where appropriate.
  • Ensure feature announcements do not prioritize Windows unless there is a technical reason, and always note Linux support status.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Configure NFSv4.1 ID domain for Azure NetApp Files ...pp-files/azure-netapp-files-configure-nfsv41-domain.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates mild Windows bias by presenting Azure PowerShell commands for feature registration before mentioning Azure CLI alternatives, and by referencing Windows in cross-platform mounting instructions. However, the core configuration steps and examples are focused on Linux NFS clients, with no exclusive use of Windows tools or missing Linux examples.
Recommendations
  • Present Azure CLI commands alongside or before Azure PowerShell commands for feature registration, as CLI is cross-platform and more commonly used on Linux.
  • Clarify that all configuration examples are for Linux clients, and provide explicit instructions for any Windows-based NFS client scenarios if relevant.
  • In cross-platform references (e.g., mounting volumes), ensure Linux instructions are given equal prominence and detail as Windows instructions.
  • Avoid using terms like 'Mount a volume for Windows or Linux VMs' without providing both sets of instructions or linking directly to Linux-specific guidance.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Configure a cache volume for Azure NetApp Files ...articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-cache-volumes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a mild Windows bias by presenting Azure PowerShell commands first and in detail for feature registration, with Azure CLI commands mentioned only as an alternative in a single sentence. There are no Linux-specific shell examples (e.g., Bash), and the registration steps are shown interactively for PowerShell only. The rest of the documentation is platform-neutral, focusing on REST API calls and ONTAP commands, which are not OS-specific.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI (Bash) command examples alongside PowerShell for feature registration and status checking, with equal prominence and detail.
  • Add notes or examples for Linux/macOS users, such as how to install and use Azure CLI, and clarify that all REST API calls can be executed from any OS.
  • Ensure that command-line examples are presented in parallel tabs or sections for both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux/macOS (Bash/Azure CLI) users.
  • Review other sections for subtle Windows-centric language or assumptions, and clarify cross-platform compatibility where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Configure customer-managed keys for Azure NetApp Files volume encryption .../azure-netapp-files/configure-customer-managed-keys.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation provides step-by-step instructions for configuring customer-managed keys for Azure NetApp Files using the Azure Portal, Azure CLI, and Azure PowerShell. The CLI instructions are cross-platform, but the PowerShell instructions are Windows-centric and are presented as a full, separate section. There is no mention of Linux-specific tools or shell environments (e.g., Bash, zsh), nor are there any examples using Linux-native scripting or automation approaches. The ordering of examples places Azure PowerShell (a Windows-first tool) on equal footing with Azure CLI, and the documentation metadata explicitly tracks Azure PowerShell. No Linux-specific guidance, troubleshooting, or considerations are provided.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state that Azure CLI commands work on both Windows and Linux, and provide example shell environments (e.g., Bash, zsh) for Linux users.
  • Add troubleshooting notes or tips for Linux users, such as handling environment variables, file paths, or authentication differences.
  • Consider including examples using Bash scripts for automation, especially for steps involving multiple CLI commands.
  • Clarify that Azure PowerShell is primarily for Windows and provide guidance for Linux users who may wish to use PowerShell Core.
  • Review documentation metadata and ensure Linux parity is tracked (e.g., devx-track-bash or devx-track-linux).
  • If relevant, mention Linux-specific tools or patterns (e.g., jq for JSON parsing, curl for REST calls) alongside CLI examples.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Manage cross-zone-region replication for Azure NetApp Files ...etapp-files/cross-zone-region-replication-configure.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing Azure PowerShell examples for feature registration and status checking, with Azure CLI commands mentioned only as an aside. The PowerShell examples are presented first and in detail, while Linux-friendly CLI commands are referenced briefly and without example syntax. No Linux-specific tools or workflows are described.
Recommendations
  • Provide full Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell examples for all operations, not just as a mention.
  • Present CLI and PowerShell examples in parallel, or alternate which is shown first, to avoid Windows-first ordering.
  • Explicitly state that both Windows and Linux users can perform these operations, and clarify any platform-specific prerequisites.
  • Include screenshots or walkthroughs using Azure CLI on Linux or macOS where applicable.
  • Review other sections for similar bias and ensure parity in tooling and instructions.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Manage default and individual user and group quotas for Azure NetApp Files volumes ...p-files/manage-default-individual-user-group-quotas.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by providing detailed quota target formats for SMB (Windows) and dual-protocol volumes with explicit SID patterns, while NFS (Linux/Unix) quota targets are mentioned briefly and generically. There are no concrete Linux/NFS command-line examples, nor are Linux tools or workflows referenced. Windows-specific patterns (SID) are described before NFS equivalents in dual-protocol sections, and no parity is offered for Linux administrators in terms of practical examples or tool references.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux/NFS examples for quota management, such as command-line workflows or integration with Linux identity management.
  • Reference Linux tools or utilities (e.g., getent, id, or nfs client commands) for identifying user/group IDs for quota targets.
  • Ensure that NFS (Linux/Unix) instructions are presented with equal detail and order as SMB (Windows) instructions, especially in dual-protocol sections.
  • Include screenshots or step-by-step guides for Linux/NFS environments where applicable.
  • Clarify how Linux administrators can map users/groups to quota targets, and provide troubleshooting tips relevant to Linux.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Mount SMB volumes for Windows VMs ...n/articles/azure-netapp-files/mount-volumes-vms-smb.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation exclusively describes mounting SMB volumes for Windows virtual machines, providing instructions only for Windows clients. There are no examples, instructions, or references for mounting SMB volumes on Linux clients, nor is there mention of Linux tools or commands. The focus is solely on Windows, indicating a Windows-first and missing Linux example bias.
Recommendations
  • Add a section detailing how to mount SMB volumes on Linux clients, including example commands (e.g., using 'mount -t cifs', 'smbclient', or relevant Linux tools).
  • Provide parity in screenshots and step-by-step instructions for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Mention any differences or prerequisites for mounting SMB volumes on Linux, such as required packages or authentication methods.
  • Ensure that both Windows and Linux mounting procedures are presented with equal prominence and clarity.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Benefits of using Azure NetApp Files for SQL Server deployment ...es/solutions-benefits-azure-netapp-files-sql-server.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on SQL Server deployment, which is traditionally a Windows-centric workload. All examples, benchmarks, and tooling references are for SQL Server, with no mention of Linux-based alternatives (such as running SQL Server on Linux or using other database engines). There are no Linux-specific deployment patterns, performance metrics, or cost analyses. The documentation implicitly assumes a Windows environment and does not address Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Include examples and benchmarks for SQL Server running on Linux VMs in Azure, comparing performance and cost with Azure NetApp Files.
  • Mention and link to documentation for deploying SQL Server on Linux with Azure NetApp Files.
  • Discuss any differences or considerations when using Azure NetApp Files with SQL Server on Linux (e.g., supported features, SMB/NFS support, tooling).
  • Provide parity in tooling references (e.g., mention Linux equivalents to perfmon, such as sar, iostat, or atop, for performance metrics).
  • Add a section or note clarifying support for both Windows and Linux SQL Server deployments, and highlight any platform-specific guidance.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Troubleshoot user access on LDAP volumes in Azure NetApp Files ...es/azure-netapp-files/troubleshoot-user-access-ldap.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation focuses exclusively on troubleshooting LDAP user access using the Azure portal GUI, without providing any command-line examples or alternative methods. There is no mention of Linux tools (such as getent, id, or ldapsearch) that are commonly used to validate LDAP group memberships, nor are there any PowerShell or Windows command-line examples. However, the lack of Linux-specific troubleshooting steps or parity is notable, especially given the POSIX/LDAP context.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux command-line examples for validating LDAP group memberships (e.g., using 'id username', 'getent group', or 'ldapsearch').
  • Include troubleshooting steps that can be performed from a Linux client, as many Azure NetApp Files users may mount volumes on Linux systems.
  • If Windows tools (such as PowerShell or Active Directory Users and Computers) are relevant, provide equivalent Linux instructions and present both platforms equally.
  • Clarify whether the portal-based troubleshooting is platform-agnostic, and explicitly mention how users on Linux or Windows can validate group memberships outside the portal.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Configure NFSv4.1 ID domain for Azure NetApp Files ...pp-files/azure-netapp-files-configure-nfsv41-domain.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias by presenting Azure PowerShell commands for feature registration before mentioning Azure CLI alternatives. The initial registration and status check steps are shown using PowerShell, with CLI commands referenced only in a brief sentence afterward. There are no Linux-specific command-line examples for Azure resource configuration, and the portal steps are platform-agnostic. The NFS client configuration is Linux-focused, but the Azure-side instructions favor Windows tooling patterns.
Recommendations
  • Present Azure CLI commands for feature registration and status check alongside or before PowerShell examples, especially since CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Explicitly state that both PowerShell and CLI methods are available and provide full command examples for each.
  • Add a note clarifying that Azure PowerShell is available on Linux, but Azure CLI may be more familiar to Linux administrators.
  • Ensure that any Azure-side configuration examples are shown in both PowerShell and CLI, with equal prominence.
  • Where possible, provide Linux-native tooling or scripting examples for Azure resource management, not just portal or PowerShell instructions.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Integration FAQs for Azure NetApp Files ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-integration.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. In the section about mounting Azure NetApp Files volumes on AVS VMs, Windows is mentioned first for both NFS and SMB mounts, and only Windows VMs are referenced for SMB shares. There are no explicit Linux SMB mount examples or guidance, and Linux is only mentioned in passing for NFS mounts. No Linux-specific tools or patterns are discussed.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux examples for both NFS and SMB mounts, including commands and supported distributions.
  • Mention Linux tools (e.g., mount.cifs for SMB, mount.nfs for NFS) alongside Windows tools and patterns.
  • Ensure parity in documentation by listing Linux and Windows options together, or alternating which is mentioned first.
  • Add troubleshooting or integration notes relevant to Linux environments, not just Windows.
  • Include links to Linux-specific documentation or guides where appropriate.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Release Notes for Azure Application Consistent Snapshot tool for Azure NetApp Files | Microsoft Docs .../articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-release-notes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides download links for both Linux and Windows binaries, but feature announcements and examples (such as SQL Server support) are consistently described in terms of Windows first or exclusively. There is a lack of explicit Linux-specific examples, especially for database support and configuration, and no mention of Linux tools or patterns (e.g., shell scripting, systemd, Linux-specific troubleshooting). The documentation does not provide parity in describing Linux usage or features, and Windows is often mentioned before Linux in feature lists and support statements.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit examples and instructions for Linux environments, including shell commands, configuration file locations, and troubleshooting steps.
  • Ensure database support features (e.g., SQL Server) are described for both Windows and Linux, or clarify platform limitations.
  • Mention Linux tools and patterns (such as systemd service integration, syslog logging, and environment variable usage) alongside any Windows-specific guidance.
  • Alternate the order of mentioning Windows and Linux platforms, or present them together to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Provide parity in documentation for supported features, including preview and GA features, for both Linux and Windows platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Configure a cache volume for Azure NetApp Files ...articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-cache-volumes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias primarily in the feature registration section, where Azure PowerShell commands are presented first and in detail, with Azure CLI commands only briefly mentioned in text and not shown as examples. There is a lack of parity in command-line examples for Linux users, who typically use Azure CLI or Bash. Additionally, Active Directory (a Windows-centric identity solution) is mentioned before LDAP in the requirements, further reinforcing Windows-first patterns.
Recommendations
  • Provide Azure CLI command examples alongside Azure PowerShell examples for feature registration and status checking, with equal prominence and detail.
  • Include Bash shell command examples where appropriate, especially for REST API calls (e.g., using curl), to support Linux users.
  • When listing identity solutions, mention LDAP before or alongside Active Directory to avoid Windows-first ordering.
  • Ensure that all instructions and examples are platform-neutral or offer both Windows and Linux alternatives, especially in sections involving command-line operations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand Azure NetApp Files control plane security .../articles/azure-netapp-files/control-plane-security.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation consistently references Azure management interfaces such as APIs, PowerShell, CLI, and portal, but lists PowerShell before CLI and does not provide any explicit Linux-specific examples, commands, or tooling. There is no mention of Bash, Linux shell scripting, or Linux-native tools, and no examples are given for Linux users. The documentation implicitly assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tools and patterns, potentially making it less accessible for Linux administrators.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention Bash and Linux shell scripting as supported management interfaces alongside PowerShell and CLI.
  • Provide example commands for both PowerShell and Bash/CLI when discussing automation and scripting tasks.
  • Add references to Linux-native tools or workflows where relevant, such as using Azure CLI in Bash or integrating with Linux-based monitoring solutions.
  • Ensure that any step-by-step instructions or code snippets include Linux equivalents, not just PowerShell or Windows-centric approaches.
  • Consider reordering interface mentions to avoid always listing PowerShell first, or clarify that all interfaces are equally supported across platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Configure customer-managed keys for Azure NetApp Files volume encryption .../azure-netapp-files/configure-customer-managed-keys.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation provides configuration instructions for Azure NetApp Files customer-managed keys using the Azure Portal, Azure CLI, and Azure PowerShell. The CLI examples are cross-platform, but the PowerShell section is Windows-centric and presented in full parity with CLI, despite PowerShell being primarily a Windows tool. The documentation does not mention Linux-specific shell environments (e.g., Bash) or provide any Linux-specific guidance, and PowerShell is presented as an equal alternative to CLI, which may suggest a Windows bias. There is no explicit mention of Linux or macOS compatibility, nor are there any troubleshooting notes for non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations
  • Clarify that Azure CLI commands are cross-platform and can be run on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Consider mentioning Bash or other Linux-native shells when presenting CLI examples, or provide explicit Bash examples where relevant.
  • Add a note that Azure PowerShell is available on Linux and macOS, but is most commonly used on Windows, and clarify any platform-specific limitations.
  • If possible, provide troubleshooting tips or notes for Linux users, especially regarding authentication, environment setup, or file path conventions.
  • Review the ordering of examples to ensure CLI (cross-platform) instructions are presented before PowerShell (Windows-centric) instructions, or clarify the intended audience for each.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Manage cross-zone-region replication for Azure NetApp Files ...etapp-files/cross-zone-region-replication-configure.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Azure PowerShell commands first and in detail for feature registration, with only a brief mention of Azure CLI as an alternative. No Linux-specific examples, shell commands, or screenshots are provided. The primary example code blocks use PowerShell syntax, which is most familiar to Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Provide Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell commands, with equal detail and visibility.
  • Explicitly mention that both Windows and Linux users can perform these operations, and clarify platform-neutral steps.
  • Include screenshots or walkthroughs using the Azure CLI in a Linux shell environment.
  • Avoid presenting Windows tools or PowerShell commands before their cross-platform equivalents.
  • Add a section or note on how to perform these tasks from macOS/Linux terminals.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Manage default and individual user and group quotas for Azure NetApp Files volumes ...p-files/manage-default-individual-user-group-quotas.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by listing SMB (Windows) formats and usage before NFS (Linux/UNIX) equivalents in several places. For example, the quota target format for SMB (Windows SIDs) is described in detail, while NFS (UIDs) is mentioned more briefly. There are no command-line examples for Linux (such as using CLI tools or shell commands), nor are Linux-specific management patterns or tools referenced. The documentation relies exclusively on Azure Portal GUI screenshots, which may be more familiar to Windows administrators, and does not provide parity for Linux users who may prefer CLI or automation.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/NFS-specific examples, such as using UIDs and GIDs, and clarify how to obtain these values on Linux systems.
  • Include CLI or automation examples (e.g., Azure CLI, REST API, or PowerShell and Bash equivalents) for quota management to support cross-platform workflows.
  • Balance the order of presentation by listing NFS (Linux/UNIX) and SMB (Windows) options together, or alternate which is presented first.
  • Reference Linux tools or commands (such as id, getent, or nfsstat) where relevant to help Linux administrators identify quota targets.
  • Add screenshots or instructions for Linux environments where appropriate, not just Azure Portal GUI.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 29 of 36 Next →