Azure Netapp Files

252
Total Pages
149
Linux-Friendly Pages
103
Pages with Bias
40.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

896 issues found
Showing 51-75 of 896 flagged pages
Azure Netapp Files Understand SMB file permissions in Azure NetApp Files ...-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on Windows-centric concepts such as NTFS ACLs and references Microsoft documentation. There are no examples or mentions of Linux tools, commands, or approaches for managing SMB file permissions, nor is there guidance for Linux administrators. The terminology and links are Windows-specific, and Linux parity is not addressed.
Recommendations
  • Include examples of managing SMB file permissions from Linux clients, such as using 'smbclient', 'setfacl', or 'getfacl'.
  • Provide guidance on how Linux users can view and modify NTFS ACLs on Azure NetApp Files SMB shares.
  • Reference relevant Linux documentation or tools alongside Microsoft/Windows documentation.
  • Clarify any limitations or differences when accessing SMB volumes from Linux versus Windows.
  • Add a section comparing Windows and Linux approaches to SMB permissions management.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Migrate volumes to Azure NetApp Files ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/migrate-volumes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing PowerShell examples and referencing a PowerShell migration assistant workflow script as the primary automation method. The feature registration steps are shown first using Azure PowerShell, with Azure CLI only mentioned as an alternative. There are no Linux shell (bash) or cross-platform CLI examples for migration workflow automation, and no Linux-specific guidance or parity in scripting. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows tooling and patterns, potentially making it less accessible to Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux/bash shell examples for feature registration and migration workflow steps using Azure CLI.
  • Include a Linux shell script sample for the migration assistant workflow, similar to the PowerShell script referenced.
  • Present Azure CLI commands before or alongside PowerShell commands to avoid Windows-first ordering.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform support and clarify that all steps can be performed from Linux/macOS environments.
  • Add troubleshooting and environment setup notes for Linux users (e.g., installing Azure CLI, authentication methods).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Monitor the capacity of an Azure NetApp Files volume ...articles/azure-netapp-files/monitor-volume-capacity.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation presents Windows client methods before Linux equivalents, provides more detailed instructions and screenshots for Windows (File Explorer and dir command), and references PowerShell in the REST API section. Windows-specific tools and patterns are mentioned explicitly, while Linux coverage is more limited and less visually supported.
Recommendations
  • Present Windows and Linux client instructions in parallel or alternate the order to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Include equivalent screenshots and step-by-step instructions for Linux tools (e.g., graphical file managers, terminal commands).
  • Reference Linux automation tools (such as shell scripts or Ansible) alongside PowerShell in REST API usage examples.
  • Expand Linux-specific troubleshooting and usage notes to match the depth provided for Windows.
  • Ensure parity in visual aids and command explanations for both platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NAS file permissions in Azure NetApp Files ...zure-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by presenting Windows SMB inheritance controls first, including a screenshot of the Windows interface, while Linux/NFS equivalents are described only in text and with less detail. Windows tools and patterns (advanced permission view, GUI screenshot) are highlighted, whereas Linux/NFS methods (umask, setgid, ACL flags) are mentioned briefly and without examples or visuals. No Linux command-line examples or screenshots are provided.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux/NFS command-line examples (e.g., setfacl, chmod, chown) for managing inheritance and permissions.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output demonstrating how to view and set inheritance flags on NFS shares.
  • Present NFS/Linux methods before or alongside Windows/SMB methods to avoid ordering bias.
  • Expand explanations of Linux/NFS permission management to match the detail given for Windows/SMB.
  • Clarify differences in inheritance handling between NFSv3 and NFSv4.1 with practical examples.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NAS protocols in Azure NetApp Files ...ure-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-protocols.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a moderate Windows bias. SMB (Windows protocol) is described with more official support and detail, and Windows terminology (NTFS, SID, Active Directory) is used throughout, often before or instead of Linux equivalents. Linux (NFS/Samba) support is described as unofficial for SMB, and there are no explicit Linux command-line examples for SMB access or configuration. Windows tools and concepts (NTFS ACLs, SID translation, Active Directory) are referenced more frequently and in greater detail than their Linux counterparts.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/Samba command-line examples for accessing SMB shares and managing permissions, alongside Windows instructions.
  • Clarify and expand on official support for Linux SMB clients (Samba), including troubleshooting and configuration guidance.
  • Mention Linux equivalents (e.g., POSIX ACLs, idmap, Kerberos configuration) whenever Windows-specific tools or terminology are introduced.
  • Balance references to Windows and Linux identity management systems (Active Directory vs. LDAP/SSSD) and explain integration steps for both.
  • Include examples and documentation for configuring dual-protocol volumes from both Windows and Linux clients, not just Windows-centric workflows.
  • Ensure that Linux tools and patterns (e.g., getfacl/setfacl, mount.cifs, nfs-utils) are described with equal prominence to Windows tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NAS share permissions in Azure NetApp Files ...e-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-permissions.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: SMB share management is described exclusively via Windows tools (MMC console, Windows Explorer), with no mention of Linux or cross-platform alternatives for managing SMB shares or ACLs. Examples and screenshots for SMB features (access-based enumeration, nonbrowsable shares, encryption) are all shown in a Windows context, with no Linux or macOS equivalents. The documentation does not provide Linux command-line examples (e.g., using smbclient, setfacl, or mount.cifs) for SMB share access or permission management, nor does it discuss how Linux clients interact with these features.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-based examples for managing and accessing SMB shares, such as using smbclient, mount.cifs, or setfacl.
  • Describe how SMB share permissions and features (access-based enumeration, nonbrowsable shares, encryption) behave or can be verified from Linux clients.
  • Mention cross-platform tools or methods for managing SMB ACLs, such as using Samba utilities or Azure CLI/REST API, if available.
  • Add screenshots or command-line output from Linux environments to illustrate parity with Windows examples.
  • Clarify any limitations or differences in feature support between Windows and Linux clients for Azure NetApp Files SMB shares.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NFS group memberships and supplemental groups for Azure NetApp Files ...-netapp-files/network-file-system-group-memberships.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing on Microsoft Active Directory LDAP implementation, referencing Windows group membership logic, and providing examples using Windows tools (e.g., ldp.exe). There are no examples or guidance for Linux LDAP servers (such as OpenLDAP), nor are Linux command-line tools (like ldapsearch) mentioned. The documentation assumes a Windows-centric environment and omits Linux-specific patterns or alternatives.
Recommendations
  • Include examples of configuring and querying group memberships using Linux LDAP servers (e.g., OpenLDAP).
  • Provide sample commands using Linux tools such as ldapsearch to illustrate how supplemental groups can be queried.
  • Mention Linux schema attributes and group management logic alongside Windows/Active Directory equivalents.
  • Clarify whether Azure NetApp Files supports non-Active Directory LDAP servers and, if so, provide parity documentation for those environments.
  • Balance screenshots and walkthroughs by showing both Windows and Linux administrative interfaces or command-line outputs.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Access an Azure NetApp Files object REST API-enabled volume with S3-compatible clients ...articles/azure-netapp-files/object-rest-api-browser.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates Windows bias by describing certificate installation using Windows GUI tools and terminology (Edge browser, Certificate window, Trusted Root Certification Authorities) without mentioning Linux equivalents. S3 Browser, a Windows-only tool, is featured with no alternative for Linux users. AWS CLI installation is described for both Windows and Linux, but the certificate installation steps are only detailed for Windows, leaving Linux users without guidance.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions for installing certificates on Linux systems (e.g., using update-ca-certificates or trust anchors).
  • Include a cross-platform S3 client example (e.g., Cyberduck, rclone, or s3cmd) with Linux installation and usage steps.
  • Present certificate installation steps for both Windows and Linux in parallel, or in separate sections, to ensure parity.
  • Avoid using Windows-specific terminology exclusively; clarify steps for macOS and Linux environments.
  • Explicitly mention limitations of S3 Browser (Windows-only) and suggest alternatives for other platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Azure VMware Solution datastore performance considerations for Azure NetApp Files ...p-files/performance-azure-vmware-solution-datastore.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates mild Windows bias. Windows tools and patterns (NTFS, volume shadow copies, Windows Server disk striping) are mentioned alongside Linux equivalents, but Windows examples and links are often listed before Linux ones. The 'Next steps' section lists Windows disk striping before Linux NFS mount options. There is a lack of explicit Linux command examples (e.g., for LVM or xfs_freeze), and monitoring instructions focus on vCenter Server and Azure Console/API, omitting Linux CLI or open-source monitoring tools. Powershell or Windows-centric management is implied in some recommendations.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux command examples for disk striping (e.g., LVM, mdadm) and snapshot operations (e.g., xfs_freeze).
  • List Linux and Windows options in parallel, or alternate which is mentioned first to avoid 'windows_first' ordering.
  • Include links to Linux documentation for disk striping and filesystem management (e.g., LVM, XFS, ext4).
  • Add Linux monitoring tool examples (e.g., iostat, nmon, atop) for datastore performance, alongside vCenter and Azure Console/API.
  • Clarify that recommendations apply equally to Linux and Windows, and provide parity in example depth and detail.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NFSv4.x access control lists in Azure NetApp Files ...rticles/azure-netapp-files/nfs-access-control-lists.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: Windows terminology and concepts (NTFS, SMB, ACE/ACL links to Windows docs) are introduced before or alongside Linux/NFS equivalents, and Windows-centric patterns (user mapping, dual-protocol behaviors) are described in detail. References to Windows tools, documentation, and concepts are frequent, while Linux/NFS-specific tools and workflows are less emphasized or introduced later. The page does provide Linux command examples (nfs4_getfacl, nfs4_setfacl), but Windows concepts are often foregrounded.
Recommendations
  • Introduce NFS/Linux concepts first before referencing Windows/NTFS/SMB equivalents.
  • Link to Linux/NFS documentation (e.g., man pages for nfs4_acl, nfs4_getfacl, nfs4_setfacl) before or alongside Windows docs.
  • Provide more Linux/NFS-specific workflows and troubleshooting steps, such as common Linux errors, configuration files, and best practices.
  • Reduce reliance on Windows-centric terminology (e.g., ACE/ACL links to Windows docs) and ensure parity with Linux/NFS documentation.
  • Clarify dual-protocol sections to equally address Linux and Windows user mapping and access control, not just Windows-to-Linux mapping.
  • Add Linux-specific examples for LDAP integration, troubleshooting, and ACL management.
  • Ensure that all screenshots and UI references are relevant to both Linux and Windows users, or provide Linux equivalents where possible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Re-establish deleted volume replication relationships in Azure NetApp Files ...tapp-files/reestablish-deleted-volume-relationships.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing Azure PowerShell commands as the primary method for feature registration, with CLI alternatives mentioned only secondarily and without explicit Linux shell examples. No Linux-specific instructions or screenshots are provided, and the initial registration steps focus on PowerShell, which is most commonly used on Windows.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI examples for feature registration and status checking, including full command syntax and sample output.
  • Include Linux shell (bash) usage patterns for Azure CLI commands, such as how to install the CLI and run the commands on Linux.
  • Clarify that both PowerShell and CLI methods are supported on all platforms, and avoid presenting PowerShell as the default or first option.
  • Add screenshots or instructions showing the process on Linux/macOS terminals where relevant.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting and operational steps for both Windows and Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand Server Message Block support in Azure NetApp Files ...cles/azure-netapp-files/sever-message-block-support.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: Windows terminology, tools, and features are referenced throughout, often without equivalent Linux examples or explanations. Windows-centric features (such as NTFS semantics, VSS shadow copy for Hyper-V, and references to Windows-specific FSCTL codes) are described in detail, while Linux client behaviors and configuration patterns are rarely mentioned or are only briefly noted. The documentation often links to Windows documentation and uses Windows terminology as the default, with Linux or UNIX features described as exceptions or disabled. There is a lack of Linux-specific configuration examples, troubleshooting guidance, and parity in feature explanations.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit examples and guidance for configuring and accessing SMB shares from Linux clients (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or relevant Linux tools).
  • Include Linux/UNIX equivalents for Windows-specific features or clarify how features behave for Linux clients (e.g., file permissions, delete semantics, offline files, symlink handling).
  • Provide troubleshooting steps and performance tuning recommendations for Linux clients, not just Windows.
  • Reference Linux documentation and tools alongside Windows ones, ensuring that links and explanations are balanced.
  • Clarify which features are relevant or behave differently for Linux clients, especially in dual-protocol or mixed environments.
  • Where Windows terminology is used (e.g., NTFS, VSS, FSCTL), provide Linux analogs or explain the impact for non-Windows clients.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files How Azure NetApp Files snapshots work .../articles/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-introduction.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates Windows bias by listing PowerShell as a primary tool for snapshot management, mentioning it before Linux alternatives, and providing direct links to PowerShell modules. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) or scripting examples, nor references to Linux-specific tools or workflows. The documentation refers to Windows-centric scripting (PowerShell) and omits parity for Linux users, such as bash scripts or Linux CLI usage patterns.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux CLI/bash examples for snapshot management alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Mention Linux tools and workflows (e.g., shell scripts, cron jobs) for automation and management.
  • Ensure that references to Azure CLI are accompanied by Linux usage notes and examples.
  • Present both Windows and Linux options together, or alternate their order to avoid 'Windows first' bias.
  • Include links to Linux-specific documentation or community resources for Azure NetApp Files.
  • Clarify that all listed tools (Azure CLI, REST API, PowerShell) are cross-platform, and provide usage guidance for Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Azure NetApp Files tools ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/tools-reference.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page lists several tools for Azure NetApp Files, but only provides explicit mention of a PowerShell-based tool (ANFHealthCheck), with no equivalent Linux shell or cross-platform alternatives described. The monitoring and automation examples (ANFCapacityManager, ANFHealthCheck) are Windows-centric, and there are no Linux CLI, Bash, or cross-platform scripting examples. This suggests a bias toward Windows and PowerShell environments, with missing Linux-specific guidance.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux/Bash examples or scripts for monitoring and reporting tasks, such as an ANFHealthCheck alternative using Bash, Python, or Azure CLI.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility for tools, or clarify if they are Windows-only.
  • Include references to Linux-native automation (e.g., cron jobs, shell scripts) for capacity management and health checks.
  • Add documentation or links for using Azure CLI and REST API for NetApp Files management on Linux.
  • Ensure that infrastructure-as-code examples (Terraform, Bicep) include Linux usage notes or examples.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand data encryption in Azure NetApp Files ...icles/azure-netapp-files/understand-data-encryption.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows/SMB encryption topics, referencing Windows-specific tools and patterns (such as UNC hardening, Group Policy, and registry settings), and providing configuration guidance primarily for Windows Active Directory environments. Linux/NFS encryption is covered, but with less depth and without explicit Linux client configuration examples. There are no Linux-specific command-line or tool references, and Windows terminology and features are introduced before their Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux client configuration examples for NFS Kerberos encryption, such as how to set up krb5p on a Linux system.
  • Provide parity in example commands and troubleshooting steps for both Windows (PowerShell, Group Policy) and Linux (shell commands, configuration files).
  • Reference Linux-based LDAP servers (e.g., OpenLDAP) and describe how to enable LDAP signing and StartTLS in those environments.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux/NFS and Windows/SMB topics are introduced with equal prominence.
  • Add links to Linux documentation for SMB and NFS encryption, such as Samba and NFS client/server guides.
  • Clarify which features and recommendations apply to non-Windows environments, and provide guidance for mixed OS deployments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand path lengths in Azure NetApp Files ...articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-path-lengths.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing more detailed explanations, examples, and screenshots for Windows/SMB scenarios than for Linux/NFS. Windows tools and configuration steps (such as registry edits, Group Policy, and UNC path handling) are covered extensively, while Linux/NFS examples and troubleshooting are minimal and less visually supported. Windows terminology and tools are introduced first and in greater detail, and Linux equivalents (such as mounting options or path querying) are not given equal prominence or depth.
Recommendations
  • Add more Linux/NFS-focused examples, including screenshots of error messages and configuration dialogs where applicable.
  • Provide step-by-step instructions for extending NFS path limits or troubleshooting NFS path errors, similar to the Windows registry and Group Policy sections.
  • Introduce Linux tools and commands (e.g., getconf, mount options, fstab settings) with the same level of detail as Windows tools.
  • Ensure that both Windows and Linux approaches are presented in parallel, with neither platform given priority in order or depth.
  • Include guidance for Linux users on handling dual-protocol scenarios, such as mapping NFS mounts to deeper directories to avoid path length issues.
  • Balance the use of screenshots and visual aids between Windows and Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Troubleshoot volume errors for Azure NetApp Files ...in/articles/azure-netapp-files/troubleshoot-volumes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: troubleshooting steps and error resolutions frequently reference Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS), Microsoft Entra Domain Services, and Windows-centric concepts (such as machine accounts, OU paths, and Kerberos errors) without equivalent detail for Linux-based directory services or environments. PowerShell commands are provided for Kerberos configuration, but Linux CLI alternatives are not. Examples and troubleshooting steps for mounting, authentication, and user mapping focus on Windows/AD scenarios, with Linux/NFS details appearing only in specific sections and often as secondary considerations. There are no Linux-specific troubleshooting commands (e.g., ldapsearch, klist, systemctl) for diagnosing LDAP/Kerberos/NFS issues, and Windows tools/patterns are mentioned first or exclusively in many cases.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux CLI equivalents for all PowerShell commands (e.g., using ldapsearch, kinit, klist, samba-tool, etc.).
  • Include troubleshooting steps for common Linux directory services (such as OpenLDAP, FreeIPA, or Samba AD) where relevant.
  • Balance examples by presenting both Windows and Linux scenarios for mounting, authentication, and user mapping errors.
  • Add Linux-specific error messages and their resolutions, especially for NFS, Kerberos, and LDAP troubleshooting.
  • When referencing AD DS or Microsoft Entra, also mention how similar issues would be approached in Linux environments.
  • Ensure that Linux tools and commands are mentioned alongside or before Windows tools where appropriate.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand guidelines for Active Directory Domain Services site design and planning ...rstand-guidelines-active-directory-domain-service-site.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently referencing Windows-centric tools (such as Active Directory Sites and Services), using Windows terminology and examples first, and omitting Linux-specific configuration steps or tools. While Linux clients are mentioned in the context of Kerberos authentication, there are no Linux-focused examples, screenshots, or guidance for managing AD DS site topology or verifying connectivity from Linux systems.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific examples for verifying AD DS connectivity, such as using 'dig', 'ldapsearch', or 'kinit' from Linux clients.
  • Provide guidance or screenshots for managing AD DS site topology using cross-platform or command-line tools (e.g., PowerShell Core, samba-tool, or relevant Linux utilities).
  • Add explicit instructions for Linux administrators on how to validate DNS SRV records and Kerberos configuration from Linux systems.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux scenarios and tools are described alongside or before Windows equivalents when relevant.
  • Clarify any differences in AD DS integration steps for Linux vs. Windows clients, especially for NFSv4.1 Kerberos and LDAP authentication.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Use DFS-N and DFS Root Consolidation with Azure NetApp Files ...s-n-and-dfs-root-consolidation-with-azure-netapp-files.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is heavily Windows-centric, focusing exclusively on Windows Server DFS Namespaces, Windows GUI tools, and PowerShell commands. All examples, instructions, and screenshots are for Windows environments, with no mention of Linux equivalents, cross-platform alternatives, or guidance for non-Windows users. The use of Windows-specific terminology and tooling (Server Manager, DFS Management console, Windows DNS server, PowerShell) is pervasive throughout the document, and Linux or open-source alternatives are not discussed.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state that DFS Namespaces is a Windows-only technology and clarify if there are any cross-platform alternatives for Linux environments.
  • Provide guidance or references for Linux users who may need similar namespace or migration functionality, such as using NFS referrals, autofs, or alternative SMB namespace management tools.
  • Include a section comparing DFS-N with Linux-based solutions for namespace virtualization and file share migration, highlighting differences and possible integration points.
  • If possible, offer instructions or best practices for accessing Azure NetApp Files SMB shares from Linux clients, including relevant mount commands and authentication considerations.
  • Mention any limitations or considerations for mixed Windows/Linux environments, especially in organizations with heterogeneous infrastructure.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand volume languages in Azure NetApp Files ...cles/azure-netapp-files/understand-volume-languages.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows tools (Explorer, PowerShell, Notepad, Notepad++, CMD, PowerShell ISE, Windows Terminal) are frequently mentioned, often before or in more detail than Linux equivalents. PowerShell examples and screenshots are prevalent, while Linux commands (aside from basic shell and iconv/file usage) are less detailed. Windows-specific troubleshooting (fonts, region settings, code pages) is covered extensively, whereas Linux troubleshooting is more limited. Some conversion and encoding examples are shown only for Windows tools, and Linux alternatives are referenced but not illustrated as thoroughly.
Recommendations
  • Ensure Linux command-line examples (e.g., encoding conversion, file viewing) are provided with equal detail and screenshots as Windows/PowerShell examples.
  • Mention Linux tools (e.g., Vim, Gedit, nano, locale settings, font configuration) alongside Windows tools for file encoding and display troubleshooting.
  • Present Linux and Windows examples in parallel, rather than focusing on Windows first or in greater depth.
  • Include troubleshooting steps for Linux clients (e.g., handling font/display issues, locale misconfigurations) similar to the Windows font/code page guidance.
  • Reference cross-platform tools (e.g., VS Code, Sublime Text) for encoding management where appropriate.
  • Add more Linux-specific scenarios for dual-protocol environments, such as how Linux NFS clients handle SMB-created files and vice versa.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files What's new in Azure NetApp Files ...ocs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/whats-new.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-12 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure NetApp Files 'What's new' demonstrates some Windows bias. Features and enhancements related to Windows technologies (such as SMB, Active Directory, Windows Server, and Windows File Explorer) are frequently highlighted, sometimes before or without equivalent Linux/NFS examples. Windows-centric terminology (e.g., 'Windows client', 'Windows File Explorer') is used in feature descriptions, and some features (like Access-based Enumeration, Non-browsable shares, SMB Continuous Availability) are described primarily in the context of Windows environments. Linux/NFS features are present, but often less detailed or not given parity in example or explanation, and Linux tools/commands are rarely mentioned.
Recommendations
  • For every Windows/SMB feature or example, provide a Linux/NFS equivalent where applicable (e.g., describe how Access-based Enumeration or non-browsable shares work for NFS clients, or clarify if not supported).
  • When referencing Windows tools (e.g., Windows File Explorer), also mention Linux alternatives (e.g., NFS client commands, file browsers).
  • Avoid using Windows-centric terminology exclusively; use cross-platform language (e.g., 'file browser' instead of 'Windows File Explorer') where possible.
  • Ensure that Linux/NFS features and enhancements are described with equal detail and clarity as Windows/SMB features.
  • Include Linux command-line examples (e.g., mount, showmount, chown) when discussing features that apply to both platforms.
  • Where features are only available for Windows/SMB, explicitly state this and, if possible, provide guidance or workarounds for Linux/NFS users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Create a capacity pool for Azure NetApp Files ...etapp-files/azure-netapp-files-set-up-capacity-pool.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by explicitly mentioning PowerShell and its module update process, while omitting equivalent instructions for Linux users (e.g., Bash, shell, or Azure CLI on Linux). Windows/PowerShell tools are referenced before any Linux alternatives, and there are no Linux-specific examples or guidance for updating tools or running commands.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit instructions for Linux users, such as how to update Azure CLI on Linux and how to use Bash or shell commands for managing Azure NetApp Files.
  • Provide parallel examples for both PowerShell (Windows) and Bash/Azure CLI (Linux/macOS) wherever command-line instructions are given.
  • Avoid referencing Windows tools (e.g., PowerShell) before Linux equivalents; present both options together or in separate, clearly labeled sections.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output examples from Linux environments where applicable.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide guidance for installation and usage on Linux/macOS.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files SMB performance best practices for Azure NetApp Files ...ure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-smb-performance.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. All operational examples, commands, and monitoring instructions are Windows-centric, referencing Windows tools (e.g., Performance Monitor, PowerShell cmdlets like Get-SmbClientNetworkInterface), and only mentioning Windows OS versions and features. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or references to Linux SMB clients or their configuration, despite SMB being cross-platform. Windows terminology and tools are used exclusively or introduced first, and Linux alternatives are absent.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Linux SMB client configuration and tuning examples (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or relevant kernel parameters).
  • Include Linux-specific commands for checking SMB Multichannel, RSS, and encryption support (such as reviewing /proc/fs/cifs stats, using 'smbstatus', or examining mount options).
  • Provide guidance for monitoring SMB performance on Linux (e.g., using iostat, atop, or netstat).
  • Reference Linux distributions and their SMB client capabilities alongside Windows versions.
  • Balance the documentation by presenting both Windows and Linux procedures and considerations for all major features and performance topics.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Azure NetApp Files SDKs and CLI tools ...icles/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-sdk-cli.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page lists both Azure CLI and PowerShell as supported command-line tools for Azure NetApp Files, but gives equal prominence to PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) without mentioning Linux-specific alternatives or providing Linux/Bash examples. The CLI tools section does not clarify cross-platform compatibility, and PowerShell is listed without noting its limited usage on Linux. No Linux-specific tools, shell scripts, or examples are provided, and the documentation does not address Linux user workflows.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state that Azure CLI is cross-platform and works on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Provide example usage for Azure CLI in Bash or Linux shell environments.
  • Clarify that PowerShell is primarily a Windows tool, and mention its cross-platform version if relevant.
  • Add references or examples for Linux-native automation (e.g., Bash scripts, cron jobs) for managing Azure NetApp Files.
  • Include a section on Linux prerequisites or installation steps for CLI tools.
  • Ensure that Linux users are addressed in the documentation, with parity in examples and tool recommendations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Create and manage Active Directory connections for Azure NetApp Files ...re-netapp-files/create-active-directory-connections.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: it relies heavily on PowerShell commands for administrative tasks (such as configuring Kerberos encryption types and registering features), references Windows-specific tools and policies (e.g., Group Policy, registry keys, Set-ADUser), and provides examples and guidance primarily for Windows environments. Linux-specific instructions, tools, or command-line examples are largely absent, especially for tasks like configuring Kerberos or LDAP settings. Windows terminology and features are introduced before their Linux equivalents, and there is little to no parity in showing how Linux administrators would perform equivalent operations.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-specific command examples for tasks such as configuring Kerberos encryption types, LDAP settings, and AD connections (e.g., using kadmin, ldapmodify, or relevant Linux utilities).
  • Include guidance for managing Active Directory connections from Linux environments, such as using Samba, realmd, or sssd for domain join and Kerberos configuration.
  • Offer parity in documentation by presenting both Windows and Linux procedures side-by-side, especially for common administrative actions.
  • Reference Linux documentation and tools (e.g., MIT Kerberos, OpenLDAP, Samba) where appropriate, and clarify differences in configuration steps.
  • Add troubleshooting sections for Linux clients, including Kerberos ticket lifetime, LDAP query timeouts, and encryption settings.
  • Avoid assuming the administrator is using Windows or PowerShell by default; mention cross-platform alternatives early in each section.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 3 of 36 Next →