Azure Netapp Files

252
Total Pages
149
Linux-Friendly Pages
103
Pages with Bias
40.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

896 issues found
Showing 726-750 of 896 flagged pages
Azure Netapp Files Understand NFSv4.x access control lists in Azure NetApp Files ...rticles/azure-netapp-files/nfs-access-control-lists.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a mild Windows bias. Windows terminology, links, and conceptual framing are introduced before Linux equivalents, such as referencing Windows ACLs and ACEs first and linking to Windows documentation. There is also a tendency to use Windows domain examples (CONTOSO.COM) and mention Windows tools and patterns (NTFS, SMB) before Linux/NFS specifics. However, the technical examples and command-line instructions are Linux/NFS-centric, and Linux tools (nfs4_getfacl, nfs4_setfacl) are used exclusively for practical guidance.
Recommendations
  • Introduce Linux/NFS concepts before or alongside Windows/SMB references, especially in the opening sections.
  • Replace or supplement links to Windows ACL/ACE documentation with Linux/NFSv4.x equivalents (e.g., man pages, RFCs).
  • Provide more Linux-centric domain examples (e.g., EXAMPLE.COM, local UNIX users) in addition to or instead of CONTOSO.COM.
  • Clarify that the practical management of NFSv4.x ACLs is performed with Linux tools, and provide links to relevant Linux documentation.
  • Ensure that any conceptual comparisons between Windows and Linux are balanced and do not imply Windows as the default or primary reference point.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Oracle database performance on Azure NetApp Files multiple volumes ...re-netapp-files/performance-oracle-multiple-volumes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is largely platform-neutral, focusing on Oracle workloads on Azure NetApp Files, but there is a subtle Windows bias in the introductory context and customer framing. The article refers to 'Microsoft customers' and cloud migration in a way that may implicitly prioritize Windows-centric environments. However, all technical examples, commands, and configuration steps are Linux-based (bash, Ansible, Oracle on Linux), and there are no PowerShell or Windows-specific tools or instructions. There are no explicit Windows-only tools or patterns, and the only command-line examples are for Linux. There is no mention of Windows Server, Windows-specific Oracle deployment, or PowerShell. The documentation does not provide Linux alternatives because all examples are already Linux-based, but it does not explicitly state that Windows is unsupported or provide parity guidance for Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Clarify platform support at the beginning: explicitly state that all examples and guidance are for Linux-based Oracle deployments, and note any limitations or differences for Windows Server if applicable.
  • If Windows Server is supported for Oracle on Azure NetApp Files, provide equivalent examples (e.g., PowerShell commands, Windows networking tools) or link to Windows-specific documentation.
  • Avoid framing that implies Azure/Windows is the default or preferred platform; use more inclusive language such as 'Azure customers' or 'Oracle administrators on Azure'.
  • Add a section or note for users running Oracle on Windows, outlining any differences, limitations, or recommended practices.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting and configuration guidance for both Linux and Windows platforms if both are supported.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Re-establish deleted volume replication relationships in Azure NetApp Files ...tapp-files/reestablish-deleted-volume-relationships.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by presenting Azure PowerShell commands first and in detail for feature registration, with only a brief mention of Azure CLI as an alternative. The PowerShell examples are explicitly shown, while Linux-friendly CLI commands are referenced only via a link, not directly demonstrated. No Linux-specific tools or shell examples are provided, and the workflow assumes familiarity with Windows/PowerShell environments.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI command examples (e.g., 'az feature register', 'az feature show') alongside PowerShell, not just as a link.
  • Ensure CLI examples are shown in code blocks, with usage notes for Linux/macOS terminals.
  • Consider including Bash or shell script equivalents for common operations.
  • Clarify that both PowerShell and CLI approaches are supported on all platforms, and indicate any platform-specific nuances.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that CLI and PowerShell examples are given equal prominence, or alternate which is presented first.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Benefits of using Azure NetApp Files for SQL Server deployment ...es/solutions-benefits-azure-netapp-files-sql-server.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exclusively discusses SQL Server deployment scenarios, performance, and benchmarking in the context of Windows-based Azure VMs, with no mention of Linux-based SQL Server deployments, Linux tools, or cross-platform considerations. All examples, instance types, and benchmarking tools are described for Windows environments, and there are no references to Linux equivalents or guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Include examples and cost/performance analysis for SQL Server on Linux VMs, highlighting any differences or parity with Windows deployments.
  • Mention Linux-compatible benchmarking tools (e.g., sysbench, fio) and provide guidance for running similar tests on Linux.
  • Discuss any differences in Azure NetApp Files integration or configuration steps for SQL Server on Linux.
  • Add links to documentation for deploying SQL Server on Linux with Azure NetApp Files.
  • Ensure that next steps and solution architectures include Linux-based options where applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Manage cross-zone-region replication for Azure NetApp Files ...etapp-files/cross-zone-region-replication-configure.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Azure PowerShell commands first and in detail for feature registration, while Linux-friendly alternatives (Azure CLI) are only mentioned briefly and parenthetically. No explicit Linux shell examples are provided, and the primary workflow assumes familiarity with PowerShell, which is more common on Windows platforms.
Recommendations
  • Provide full Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell, not just links.
  • Present CLI and PowerShell examples in parallel, or alternate which is shown first.
  • Explicitly mention platform compatibility for each tool (e.g., Azure CLI works on Linux, macOS, and Windows).
  • Include screenshots or instructions for using the Azure Portal, which is platform-agnostic.
  • Avoid assuming PowerShell as the default; clarify that users can choose their preferred tool.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Integration FAQs for Azure NetApp Files ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-integration.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias by mentioning Windows VMs and SMB share mapping before Linux VMs and their NFS mounting capabilities. While it states that both Windows and Linux VMs can mount NFS volumes, only Windows VMs are explicitly mentioned for SMB shares, with no Linux SMB example or clarification. There are no Linux-specific tooling or command examples, and the documentation does not provide parity in examples or guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention and provide examples for mounting SMB shares on Linux VMs, if supported, or clarify if this is not supported.
  • Provide step-by-step instructions or links for both Windows and Linux environments when discussing mounting NFS or SMB volumes.
  • Ensure that Linux tools and patterns (e.g., mount commands, cifs-utils for SMB) are referenced alongside Windows equivalents.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows are treated equally, rather than listing Windows first.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand Azure NetApp Files control plane security .../articles/azure-netapp-files/control-plane-security.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page consistently mentions PowerShell as a primary interface for managing Azure NetApp Files, listing it before CLI and APIs. There are no explicit examples or references to Linux-specific tools, shell commands, or workflows. The absence of Linux/Unix command-line examples and the prioritization of PowerShell in interface lists suggest a subtle Windows bias.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention Bash, Azure CLI, and REST API as equal alternatives to PowerShell for managing Azure NetApp Files.
  • Provide example commands for both PowerShell and Azure CLI/Bash where relevant, especially in sections discussing automation and scripting.
  • Include references to Linux/Unix environments and workflows, such as using cron jobs, shell scripts, or native Linux monitoring tools.
  • Avoid listing PowerShell first in interface lists; alternate or group interfaces by platform-neutral categories.
  • Add a note clarifying that all features and operations are accessible from Linux and macOS environments using Azure CLI and REST API.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Release Notes for Azure Application Consistent Snapshot tool for Azure NetApp Files | Microsoft Docs .../articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-release-notes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides download links for both Linux and Windows binaries, but feature announcements and examples often mention Windows (e.g., 'Microsoft SQL Server 2022 on Windows') without equivalent Linux examples. There is a tendency to highlight Windows support and features first, with limited explicit mention of Linux-specific usage or parity, especially for database features. No Linux-specific database support or examples are provided, and configuration instructions are generic without platform-specific guidance.
Recommendations
  • Include explicit examples and feature parity notes for Linux, especially for database support (e.g., SQL Server on Linux, Oracle, SAP HANA).
  • When announcing new features, clarify their availability on both Linux and Windows, or note any differences.
  • Provide platform-specific configuration and troubleshooting sections for both Linux and Windows.
  • Ensure that database support and enhancements are described for both platforms, or explain any limitations.
  • Add Linux-first or Linux-specific examples where appropriate, such as environment variable configuration, logging, or integration with Linux-native tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Configure NFSv4.1 ID domain for Azure NetApp Files ...pp-files/azure-netapp-files-configure-nfsv41-domain.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Azure PowerShell commands first and in detail for registering and checking the NFSv4.1 ID domain feature, with only a brief mention of Azure CLI as an alternative. The registration steps and examples are shown using PowerShell syntax, which is most familiar to Windows users. There is no Linux shell (bash) equivalent shown directly in the main steps, and the order of presentation prioritizes Windows tooling. However, the remainder of the documentation focuses on Linux client configuration, which is appropriate for NFS use cases.
Recommendations
  • Provide bash/Azure CLI examples for feature registration and status checking alongside PowerShell, ideally before or at least equally with PowerShell examples.
  • Explicitly mention that both Windows and Linux users can use Azure CLI, and provide step-by-step CLI instructions.
  • Consider reordering the registration instructions so that CLI (cross-platform) commands are presented first, or side-by-side with PowerShell.
  • Add a note clarifying that PowerShell is not required and that Linux users can use CLI commands for all Azure NetApp Files operations.
  • Ensure all tooling references are platform-neutral or provide parity between Windows and Linux where possible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Configure customer-managed keys for Azure NetApp Files volume encryption .../azure-netapp-files/configure-customer-managed-keys.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation provides step-by-step instructions for configuring customer-managed keys for Azure NetApp Files using the Azure Portal, Azure CLI, and Azure PowerShell. While the CLI examples are cross-platform, the PowerShell instructions are Windows-centric and presented as a primary method alongside CLI, with no mention of Linux-specific tools or shell environments (e.g., Bash, zsh). The ordering of examples places PowerShell before any Linux-native scripting, and there are no references to Linux-specific patterns or troubleshooting. There is also no mention of using Bash scripts, Linux shell environments, or alternative Linux-native tools for automation.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work on both Windows and Linux, and provide example shell environments (e.g., Bash, zsh) for Linux users.
  • Add Bash script examples for common automation tasks, such as variable assignment and command chaining, to demonstrate Linux-native workflows.
  • Include troubleshooting steps or notes relevant to Linux environments (e.g., permissions, environment variables, file paths).
  • Clarify that PowerShell is available on Linux, but also provide guidance for users who prefer native Linux shells.
  • Review the ordering of examples to avoid implicit prioritization of Windows tools (e.g., present CLI/Bash examples before PowerShell, or side-by-side).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Delete volume replications or volumes for Azure NetApp Files cross-region replication .../azure-netapp-files/cross-region-replication-delete.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides instructions using GUI actions such as right-clicking and selecting menu items, which are typical of Windows environments. There are no examples or mentions of Linux CLI tools, shell commands, or alternative workflows for Linux users. The documentation implicitly assumes a Windows-like interface, potentially leaving Linux administrators without clear guidance.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent instructions for Linux environments, such as using Azure CLI, REST API, or shell commands to delete replications and volumes.
  • Clarify whether the described GUI actions are available on all platforms, or specify platform requirements.
  • Provide screenshots or examples for Linux or cross-platform management tools if available.
  • Include a section comparing Windows GUI and Linux CLI workflows for these tasks.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Generate user and group quota reports for Azure NetApp Files volumes ...zure-netapp-files/generate-user-group-quota-reports.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing Azure PowerShell examples first and in detail for feature registration, while Linux-friendly alternatives (Azure CLI) are mentioned only briefly and as a secondary option. There are no explicit Linux shell or Bash examples, and Windows-centric tools (PowerShell) are prioritized in command-line instructions.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell, with equal detail and visibility.
  • Include Bash or shell script examples for Linux users where relevant.
  • When listing command-line options, present Azure CLI and PowerShell examples together, or alternate the order to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Add notes or sections clarifying cross-platform usage, including any OS-specific considerations for quota reporting.
  • Ensure screenshots and UI instructions are not Windows-centric (e.g., avoid showing only Windows-style UI elements if Linux users may use the portal).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Re-establish deleted volume replication relationships in Azure NetApp Files ...tapp-files/reestablish-deleted-volume-relationships.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by providing Azure PowerShell commands as the primary example for feature registration, with Azure CLI (cross-platform) only mentioned briefly in text and not shown as a code example. The initial registration steps are presented with PowerShell syntax, which is most commonly used on Windows, and there is no explicit Linux shell or CLI example shown. The GUI instructions are platform-neutral, but the command-line guidance favors Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell examples for feature registration and status checking.
  • Ensure that CLI examples use bash syntax and are clearly marked as cross-platform.
  • Consider listing Azure CLI commands before or alongside PowerShell commands to avoid Windows-first ordering.
  • Add notes or sections clarifying that all operations can be performed from Linux, macOS, or Windows environments using Azure CLI.
  • Where possible, include screenshots or instructions relevant to Linux/macOS users (e.g., terminal usage).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Mount SMB volumes for Windows VMs ...n/articles/azure-netapp-files/mount-volumes-vms-smb.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation exclusively covers mounting SMB volumes for Windows virtual machines, providing instructions only for Windows clients. There are no examples, instructions, or mentions of how to mount SMB volumes on Linux clients, nor are Linux tools or commands referenced.
Recommendations
  • Add a section detailing how to mount SMB volumes on Linux VMs, including relevant commands (e.g., using 'mount -t cifs' or 'smbclient').
  • Provide Linux-specific troubleshooting tips and prerequisites (such as required packages).
  • Ensure examples and screenshots are available for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Mention Linux tools (e.g., cifs-utils) alongside Windows tools where appropriate.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files azure-netapp-files/create-active-directory-connections.md ...les/azure-netapp-files/includes/netlogon-april-2023.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on the April 2023 Windows Update and its impact on Netlogon Secure Channel for Azure NetApp Files. It references Windows-specific updates and does not mention Linux equivalents, tools, or patterns. There are no examples or guidance for Linux environments, nor any discussion of how non-Windows systems might be affected or should respond.
Recommendations
  • Add information about how Linux-based SMB clients or servers interact with Netlogon Secure Channel and whether they are affected by the Windows Update.
  • Provide guidance or examples for administrators managing Azure NetApp Files from Linux systems, including relevant troubleshooting or configuration steps.
  • Include references to Linux tools (e.g., Samba) and describe any necessary actions or considerations for those environments.
  • Clarify whether the described changes are Windows-specific or if there are implications for cross-platform setups.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Requirements and considerations for Azure NetApp Files large volumes ...app-files/large-volumes-requirements-considerations.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in its operational examples. Feature registration and status checks are shown first and primarily with Azure PowerShell commands, with Azure CLI (Linux-friendly) alternatives mentioned only secondarily and in less detail. No Linux shell (bash) examples are provided, and the command snippets use PowerShell syntax. There are no references to Linux-specific tools or workflows in the configuration sections, despite mentioning Linux in performance benchmarking.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux shell (bash) equivalents for all PowerShell commands, especially for feature registration and status checks.
  • Present Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell examples, with full syntax and output samples.
  • Explicitly mention that both Windows and Linux environments are supported for management tasks, and link to cross-platform CLI installation guides.
  • Add a section or note clarifying parity between Windows and Linux management workflows.
  • Ensure that any referenced scripts or automation tools are available in both PowerShell and bash formats.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files What changing to volume hard quota means for your Azure NetApp Files service ...les/azure-netapp-files/volume-hard-quota-guidelines.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas. In the VM-level monitoring section, Windows examples (Explorer, dir command) are presented before Linux equivalents (df command). In the CLI/PowerShell section, PowerShell screenshots and references are prominent, with no explicit Bash or Linux shell examples, despite Azure CLI being cross-platform. The documentation also refers to Windows-specific UI patterns (Explorer) and command-line tools before Linux alternatives.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux examples (e.g., df, ls, Bash/CLI usage) alongside or before Windows examples in relevant sections.
  • Include screenshots and command samples for Linux shell usage of Azure CLI, not just PowerShell.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI commands are cross-platform and provide explicit Bash/Linux shell command examples.
  • Balance UI references by mentioning Linux desktop file managers (e.g., Nautilus, Dolphin) where applicable.
  • Review all sections for implicit prioritization of Windows tools and ensure Linux parity in instructions and visuals.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NFSv4.x access control lists in Azure NetApp Files ...rticles/azure-netapp-files/nfs-access-control-lists.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a mild Windows bias. Windows/NTFS ACLs are referenced before Linux/NFSv4.x ACLs, and links to Windows documentation (e.g., Microsoft's ACL/ACE pages) are used for conceptual explanations. The page also frequently uses Windows-centric domain examples (CONTOSO.COM, root@microsoft.com) and references Windows user mapping in dual-protocol scenarios before discussing Linux equivalents. However, all technical examples, commands, and procedures are Linux/NFS-focused, with no PowerShell or Windows command-line examples given.
Recommendations
  • Reference Linux/NFSv4.x ACL documentation (e.g., man pages, kernel.org, nfs4-acl documentation) before or alongside Windows ACL/ACE documentation.
  • Use more Linux/UNIX-centric domain and username examples (e.g., user1@linuxdomain.local) to balance the CONTOSO.COM and root@microsoft.com references.
  • Clarify dual-protocol sections by presenting Linux/NFS mapping and behaviors before Windows/NTFS mapping, or provide parallel explanations.
  • Ensure that conceptual explanations of ACLs and ACEs are not solely linked to Windows documentation; include links to Linux/NFSv4.x resources.
  • If referencing Windows tools or patterns, always provide the Linux/NFS equivalent and present them with equal prominence.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Oracle database performance on Azure NetApp Files multiple volumes ...re-netapp-files/performance-oracle-multiple-volumes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is largely platform-neutral in its technical recommendations and examples, focusing on Oracle on Azure NetApp Files. However, there is a subtle Windows bias in the introductory context ('Microsoft customers') and the absence of explicit Linux-specific examples or parity for deployment and management tools. While the article mentions Linux commands (e.g., ip a, ethtool) and Ansible for automation, it does not provide equivalent Windows or PowerShell examples, nor does it clarify cross-platform differences or considerations. The documentation assumes Linux as the default OS for Oracle workloads, which is typical for Oracle, but does not address Windows deployment scenarios or provide guidance for users on Windows platforms.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit notes or sections clarifying platform support for Oracle on Azure NetApp Files, including any differences for Windows Server deployments.
  • Provide PowerShell or Windows CLI equivalents for network and NIC configuration steps (e.g., checking NIC status, accelerated networking), or clarify if these steps are Linux-only.
  • Include examples or references for deploying Oracle on Azure VMs running Windows, if supported, or explicitly state that only Linux is supported.
  • Ensure automation instructions (e.g., Ansible, bash scripts) mention alternatives for Windows environments, such as PowerShell DSC or Azure Automation.
  • Add a table or sidebar comparing Linux and Windows deployment patterns, prerequisites, and recommended practices for Oracle on Azure NetApp Files.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Benefits of using Azure NetApp Files for SQL Server deployment ...es/solutions-benefits-azure-netapp-files-sql-server.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on SQL Server deployment scenarios, which are inherently Windows-centric, and does not mention or provide examples for Linux-based SQL Server deployments. All references, benchmarks, and tooling are described in the context of Windows (e.g., perfmon, SQL Server), with no mention of Linux equivalents or cross-platform considerations.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention that SQL Server is supported on Linux and discuss any differences or considerations when deploying on Linux with Azure NetApp Files.
  • Provide performance benchmarks or cost analyses for SQL Server running on Linux VMs, in addition to Windows-based examples.
  • Include Linux-specific monitoring tools (e.g., iostat, sar, atop) alongside perfmon when discussing performance measurement.
  • Add links or references to documentation for deploying SQL Server on Linux with Azure NetApp Files.
  • Clarify whether the SSB benchmarking tool and other referenced tools are cross-platform or provide Linux usage instructions if available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/includes/oracle-dnfs.md ...in/articles/azure-netapp-files/includes/oracle-dnfs.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation page does not provide any platform-specific examples or guidance, but the absence of Linux/Unix-specific instructions or references is notable given that Oracle dNFS is most commonly deployed on Linux/Unix systems. There is no mention of Linux tools, commands, or best practices, nor is there any indication that the guidance applies equally to both Windows and Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention that the patching guidelines apply to both Windows and Linux/Unix deployments, or clarify if there are platform-specific steps.
  • Provide Linux/Unix-specific examples or references, especially since Oracle dNFS is predominantly used on those platforms.
  • Include links or notes about relevant Linux tools or commands for managing Oracle dNFS.
  • Ensure parity by reviewing referenced materials (such as the linked FAQ) for similar bias and updating them as needed.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-integration.md ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-integration.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a mild Windows bias by mentioning Windows VMs and SMB shares before Linux equivalents, and by providing more detail for Windows scenarios (e.g., mapping SMB shares on Windows VMs) while omitting explicit Linux SMB examples. NFS mounting is stated as possible for both Windows and Linux, but SMB examples are only given for Windows, with no mention of Linux SMB client usage.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit examples or statements for mounting SMB shares on Linux VMs, including supported methods and any caveats.
  • Ensure that both Windows and Linux scenarios are described with equal detail and order (e.g., mention Linux first in some cases, or present both together).
  • Provide sample commands or links for both Windows (PowerShell, GUI) and Linux (mount, cifs-utils) for mounting NFS and SMB volumes.
  • Review other FAQ entries and related documentation to ensure Linux parity in integration guidance and troubleshooting.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-default-individual-user-group-quotas.md ...p-files/manage-default-individual-user-group-quotas.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by providing detailed instructions and examples for SMB (Windows) user quota formats (SIDs) before or instead of Linux/NFS equivalents. While NFS is mentioned, there are no concrete Linux command-line examples or references to Linux tools for quota management. The documentation focuses on Azure portal GUI steps and Windows-specific identifiers, with no parity for Linux users seeking CLI or OS-native management options.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux/NFS-specific examples, such as showing how to retrieve user/group IDs on Linux systems.
  • Include command-line instructions for managing quotas using Linux tools (e.g., show how to find UID/GID with id command).
  • Clarify the mapping between Windows SIDs and Linux UIDs/GIDs for dual-protocol volumes.
  • Provide parity in examples and explanations for both Windows (SMB) and Linux (NFS) environments.
  • Reference Linux quota management patterns or tools where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/mount-volumes-vms-smb.md ...n/articles/azure-netapp-files/mount-volumes-vms-smb.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation exclusively covers mounting SMB volumes on Windows virtual machines, providing only Windows client instructions and omitting any Linux examples or tools. The focus is entirely on Windows, with no mention of how to mount SMB volumes on Linux VMs or using Linux utilities.
Recommendations
  • Add a section detailing how to mount SMB volumes on Linux VMs, including example commands using tools like 'mount.cifs' or 'smbclient'.
  • Provide parity in instructions, ensuring both Windows and Linux mounting procedures are covered with screenshots and step-by-step guidance.
  • Reference Linux-specific troubleshooting tips or common issues when mounting SMB volumes.
  • Clarify in the introduction that the guide is Windows-focused, or broaden the scope to include Linux clients.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/volume-hard-quota-guidelines.md ...les/azure-netapp-files/volume-hard-quota-guidelines.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas. In the VM-level monitoring section, Windows examples and screenshots are presented before Linux equivalents, and more detail is given for Windows (multiple screenshots, command prompt usage) compared to Linux (single command, fewer screenshots). In the CLI/PowerShell section, PowerShell screenshots and terminology are used for Azure CLI examples, potentially confusing Linux users and implying a preference for Windows tooling. There is no mention of Linux-specific Azure CLI usage or shell environments, and PowerShell is referenced repeatedly as the default scripting interface.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows examples in parallel, or alternate which OS is shown first in each section.
  • Provide equivalent detail and screenshots for Linux commands (e.g., show both 'df' and 'lsblk' outputs, include multiple screenshots as for Windows).
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and show examples in both Bash (Linux/macOS) and PowerShell (Windows), with screenshots from both environments.
  • Avoid using PowerShell terminology or screenshots as the default for CLI usage; explicitly mention and illustrate Bash usage for Linux users.
  • Include notes or links for Linux users on how to install and use Azure CLI in their environment.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting and FAQ sections by including Linux-specific guidance where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 30 of 36 Next →