Azure Netapp Files

252
Total Pages
149
Linux-Friendly Pages
103
Pages with Bias
40.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

896 issues found
Showing 751-775 of 896 flagged pages
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-release-notes.md .../articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-release-notes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides download links for both Linux and Windows binaries, but new features and examples are often described with a Windows-first approach, especially for Microsoft SQL Server, which is repeatedly referenced as 'on Windows' without mention of Linux support. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples or parity notes for SQL Server or other features. Configuration and troubleshooting instructions do not provide Linux-specific guidance or examples, and Windows support is highlighted as a major feature addition, while Linux support is treated as a baseline.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state Linux support for all major features, especially for database engines like SQL Server, and clarify any limitations or differences.
  • Provide configuration and usage examples for both Linux and Windows platforms, including environment variable setup and file locations.
  • When introducing new features, mention Linux and Windows support together, or clarify if a feature is Windows-only.
  • Add troubleshooting and operational notes for Linux environments, such as log file locations, permissions, and common issues.
  • Ensure parity in documentation structure, so Linux users are not left to infer support or steps from Windows-centric instructions.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-cache-volumes.md ...articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-cache-volumes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily in the 'Register the feature' section, where Azure PowerShell commands are presented first and in detail, while Azure CLI (cross-platform) commands are only mentioned briefly as an alternative. There are no Linux-specific examples or shell commands, and the documentation does not provide parity in command-line instructions for Linux users. The rest of the documentation is API-focused and protocol-agnostic, but the initial registration workflow favors Windows/PowerShell users.
Recommendations
  • Provide full Azure CLI command examples alongside Azure PowerShell, including output samples and usage notes.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and suitable for Linux/macOS users.
  • Ensure that all command-line instructions are available in both PowerShell and Bash/CLI formats.
  • Consider adding a 'Platform considerations' section to clarify any differences or requirements for Windows vs. Linux environments.
  • Where possible, avoid presenting Windows/PowerShell commands first; alternate or present both together.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-customer-managed-keys.md .../azure-netapp-files/configure-customer-managed-keys.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation provides step-by-step instructions for configuring customer-managed keys for Azure NetApp Files using the Azure Portal, Azure CLI, and Azure PowerShell. The Azure PowerShell section is prominent and detailed, and the documentation includes references to PowerShell cmdlets and patterns. The ordering of examples places Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI in some sections, and there is no mention of Linux-specific tools or shell environments (e.g., Bash, zsh), nor any explicit Linux command-line examples. The CLI examples use Azure CLI, which is cross-platform, but there is no explicit guidance or troubleshooting for Linux environments, nor mention of Linux-specific considerations.
Recommendations
  • Ensure that CLI examples explicitly mention compatibility with Linux/macOS shells (e.g., Bash), and provide sample commands using Bash syntax where relevant.
  • Add troubleshooting notes or environment setup instructions for Linux users, such as handling authentication, environment variables, or file paths.
  • Balance the prominence of PowerShell and CLI examples, and consider placing CLI (cross-platform) instructions before PowerShell (Windows-centric) instructions.
  • Reference Linux-native tools or patterns where appropriate, such as using curl for REST API calls, or jq for JSON parsing.
  • Include a note clarifying that Azure CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide links to installation guides for all platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/control-plane-security.md .../articles/azure-netapp-files/control-plane-security.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation consistently mentions PowerShell as a management interface for Azure NetApp Files, listing it before CLI and other cross-platform options. There are no explicit examples or references to Linux-specific tools, shell commands, or patterns. The documentation does not provide parity in examples or guidance for Linux users, focusing instead on generic Azure interfaces and mentioning PowerShell first, which is traditionally associated with Windows environments.
Recommendations
  • List Azure CLI before PowerShell when describing management interfaces, or present both equally.
  • Include explicit examples using Azure CLI and Bash shell commands for common operations.
  • Reference cross-platform tools and workflows, such as Bash scripting or automation via Linux-based systems.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux administrators, highlighting best practices and tool compatibility.
  • Ensure that any sample scripts or automation guidance is provided in both PowerShell and Bash/CLI formats.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/cross-zone-region-replication-configure.md ...etapp-files/cross-zone-region-replication-configure.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Azure PowerShell commands first and in detail for feature registration, with only a brief mention of Azure CLI as an alternative. No Linux-specific examples or shell commands are provided, and the PowerShell examples are given before mentioning CLI equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell commands for all steps, not just as a side note.
  • Include Linux shell command examples where relevant, especially for registration and status checking.
  • Ensure that CLI examples are presented with equal prominence and detail as PowerShell examples.
  • Add notes or guidance for Linux/macOS users regarding prerequisites and environment setup.
  • Review other sections for similar patterns and update to ensure cross-platform parity.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/includes/netlogon-april-2023.md ...les/azure-netapp-files/includes/netlogon-april-2023.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on the impact of a Windows Update (April 2023) and Netlogon Secure Channel, referencing Windows-specific changes and providing no mention of Linux or cross-platform considerations. There are no examples or guidance for Linux environments, nor is there discussion of how non-Windows systems might be affected or should respond.
Recommendations
  • Add information about how Linux clients or Samba-based systems interact with Azure NetApp Files in the context of Netlogon Secure Channel changes.
  • Include examples or guidance for administrators managing non-Windows environments.
  • Clarify whether the Windows Update has any impact on Linux or mixed-OS deployments, and provide troubleshooting or mitigation steps for those scenarios if applicable.
  • Reference equivalent Linux tools or configuration patterns where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/nfs-access-control-lists.md ...rticles/azure-netapp-files/nfs-access-control-lists.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias by referencing Windows concepts and documentation links before Linux equivalents, especially in the introduction where ACLs are described as similar to Windows NTFS permissions and links point to Windows-specific documentation. Windows terminology and mapping are discussed before Linux/NFS specifics, and Windows user mapping is described in dual-protocol scenarios. However, the technical examples and command usage throughout the page are Linux/NFS-centric, using Linux tools and commands (nfs4_getfacl, nfs4_setfacl, chmod, chown) and focusing on NFSv4.x ACL management from Linux clients.
Recommendations
  • Replace or supplement Windows documentation links (e.g., /windows/win32/secauthz/access-control-lists) with links to Linux/NFS ACL documentation, such as man pages for nfs4_acl or relevant Linux kernel documentation.
  • When introducing ACL concepts, present Linux/NFS ACLs first, and only mention Windows NTFS permissions as an analogy for users familiar with Windows, rather than as the primary reference.
  • Ensure that any cross-platform mapping discussions (e.g., dual-protocol environments) provide equal detail for both Linux and Windows, and clarify which tools and concepts apply to each platform.
  • Add explicit references to Linux/NFS documentation and best practices in the 'Next steps' section, such as links to Linux NFS client configuration guides or NFSv4 ACL management tutorials.
  • Review terminology to avoid framing NFSv4.x ACLs primarily in terms of Windows concepts; instead, emphasize their native UNIX/Linux context.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/performance-oracle-multiple-volumes.md ...re-netapp-files/performance-oracle-multiple-volumes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is largely platform-neutral, focusing on Oracle on Azure NetApp Files, but there is a subtle Windows bias in the introductory context ("Microsoft customers") and the absence of explicit Linux-specific guidance or examples. While the technical procedures (such as NIC validation) use Linux commands, there are no Windows or PowerShell examples, nor are Windows-specific tools or patterns mentioned. However, the documentation does not provide parity by explicitly acknowledging Linux as the primary OS for Oracle workloads, nor does it offer comparative guidance for Windows-based Oracle deployments, which could be relevant for some Azure users.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state the supported operating systems for Oracle on Azure NetApp Files (e.g., Linux, Windows) and clarify if Linux is required or recommended.
  • If Windows is supported, provide equivalent Windows/PowerShell commands and configuration steps alongside the Linux examples.
  • Add a section comparing Linux and Windows deployment patterns for Oracle on Azure, including any differences in performance, configuration, or support.
  • Ensure that Linux is not assumed by default; make the OS requirements and recommendations clear for all audiences.
  • If Linux is the only supported platform, clarify this early in the documentation to avoid confusion for Windows-oriented users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-restore-file-client.md ...es/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-restore-file-client.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides both Linux (NFS) and Windows (SMB) client instructions for restoring files from snapshots. However, the Windows section includes more detailed steps, screenshots, and mentions unique Windows features (such as the 'Previous Versions' tab), while the Linux section is limited to basic command-line instructions. The Windows section also appears after the Linux section, but it is more comprehensive and highlights Windows-specific GUI tools.
Recommendations
  • Expand the Linux section to include more detailed instructions, such as using graphical file managers (e.g., Nautilus, Dolphin) to access the .snapshot directory, if applicable.
  • Add screenshots for the Linux workflow, similar to those provided for Windows, to ensure parity in user experience.
  • Mention and explain any Linux/NFS equivalents to the Windows 'Previous Versions' feature, such as using file manager integration or third-party tools, if available.
  • Ensure that both Linux and Windows sections provide similar depth and clarity, covering both command-line and GUI-based restoration methods where possible.
  • Consider adding a summary table comparing the steps for Linux and Windows clients to highlight parity and differences.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/reestablish-deleted-volume-relationships.md ...tapp-files/reestablish-deleted-volume-relationships.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Azure PowerShell commands first and in detail for feature registration, with code blocks and step-by-step instructions. While Azure CLI is mentioned as an alternative, it is referenced only briefly and without explicit command examples. No Linux-specific instructions or screenshots are provided, and the use of PowerShell is implicitly Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell, with equivalent step-by-step instructions.
  • Include notes or sections clarifying cross-platform usage, especially for Linux and macOS users.
  • Add screenshots or UI references from non-Windows environments if applicable.
  • Consider listing Azure CLI instructions before or alongside PowerShell to avoid 'Windows first' ordering.
  • Ensure all code blocks are labeled with their platform relevance (e.g., 'Azure CLI', 'PowerShell').
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/solutions-benefits-azure-netapp-files-sql-server.md ...es/solutions-benefits-azure-netapp-files-sql-server.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exclusively discusses SQL Server deployment scenarios, performance, and benchmarking in the context of Azure NetApp Files, but only references SQL Server (a Windows-centric product) and does not mention Linux-based SQL Server deployments or provide any Linux-specific examples, tools, or considerations. There are no references to Linux commands, tools, or deployment patterns, and all examples and performance discussions implicitly assume a Windows environment.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention that SQL Server is available on both Windows and Linux, and clarify whether the benefits described apply equally to both platforms.
  • Include examples or case studies of deploying SQL Server on Linux VMs with Azure NetApp Files.
  • Reference Linux-based benchmarking tools or show how to run the SSB tool and collect performance metrics on Linux (e.g., using sysstat/iostat/vmstat instead of perfmon).
  • If there are any differences in configuration or performance when using Linux, document those considerations.
  • Provide parity in 'Next Steps' by linking to Linux-specific deployment guides or documentation if available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-release-notes.md .../articles/azure-netapp-files/azacsnap-release-notes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides download links and release notes for both Linux and Windows versions of AzAcSnap, but there is a noticeable Windows bias in several areas. Features for Microsoft SQL Server are repeatedly highlighted as 'on Windows' or only available for Windows, with no mention of Linux support or parity for SQL Server. Configuration and environment variable examples are generic, but database-specific improvements (e.g., timeout settings, backup attempts) are described only for SQL Server on Windows. There are no explicit Linux/POSIX shell or tool examples, nor are Linux-specific database scenarios discussed. Windows support is often mentioned first or exclusively when new features are introduced.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit examples and guidance for using AzAcSnap with SQL Server on Linux, if supported.
  • Ensure parity in feature descriptions for both Windows and Linux platforms, especially for database-specific features.
  • Include Linux/POSIX shell command examples where environment variables or configuration changes are discussed.
  • When introducing new features, mention both Windows and Linux applicability (or limitations) equally and clearly.
  • If a feature is Windows-only, explicitly state the lack of Linux support and provide a roadmap or rationale.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/mount-volumes-vms-smb.md ...n/articles/azure-netapp-files/mount-volumes-vms-smb.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation exclusively describes how to mount SMB volumes on Windows virtual machines, with instructions and screenshots tailored to Windows clients. There are no examples, instructions, or mentions of how to perform the same operation on Linux clients, nor are Linux tools or commands referenced.
Recommendations
  • Add a section detailing how to mount SMB volumes on Linux clients, including relevant commands (e.g., 'mount -t cifs', 'smbclient') and configuration steps.
  • Provide Linux-specific screenshots or terminal examples to illustrate the process.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting tips and FAQs for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Reference Linux tools (such as cifs-utils) alongside Windows tools where appropriate.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/performance-oracle-multiple-volumes.md ...re-netapp-files/performance-oracle-multiple-volumes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is largely platform-neutral, focusing on Oracle database performance on Azure NetApp Files. However, there is a subtle Windows bias: Azure is a Microsoft cloud and the introduction frames the migration imperative from the perspective of 'Microsoft customers.' While the technical examples and deployment steps are Linux-centric (e.g., bash scripts, Ansible, Linux system files, Linux commands like ip and ethtool), there are no explicit Windows or PowerShell examples, nor are Windows-specific tools or patterns discussed. However, the documentation does not provide parity for Windows-based Oracle deployments or mention how to achieve similar configurations on Windows VMs, which may leave Windows administrators without guidance.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit examples or guidance for deploying Oracle on Windows Server VMs in Azure, including configuration of storage, networking, and performance tuning.
  • Provide PowerShell or Windows CLI equivalents for any Linux command-line steps (e.g., NIC configuration, network performance validation).
  • Include a section comparing Linux and Windows deployment patterns for Oracle on Azure NetApp Files, highlighting any differences or best practices.
  • Clarify whether the recommendations (such as Direct NFS, ASM, and specific tunables) apply only to Linux or also to Windows, and provide Windows-specific advice where needed.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/reestablish-deleted-volume-relationships.md ...tapp-files/reestablish-deleted-volume-relationships.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation page primarily provides Azure PowerShell examples for feature registration, with PowerShell commands presented first and in detail. Azure CLI (cross-platform) is mentioned only briefly as an alternative, without explicit command examples. There are no Linux-specific instructions, nor are Linux tools or shell patterns referenced. The UI instructions are platform-neutral, but the command-line guidance favors Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell examples for feature registration and status checking.
  • Present Azure CLI (cross-platform) commands before or alongside PowerShell to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Include notes clarifying that both PowerShell and CLI are available on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Add links to Azure CLI installation and usage documentation for Linux users.
  • Ensure future documentation consistently offers parity between Windows/PowerShell and Linux/CLI workflows.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-quickstart-set-up-account-create-volumes.md ...-netapp-files-quickstart-set-up-account-create-volumes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation provides parity between Azure Portal, PowerShell, Azure CLI, ARM Template, and Terraform for all major tasks. However, there is a subtle Windows bias: PowerShell examples are given equal prominence as Azure CLI, and in some sections (such as registration and resource creation), PowerShell is mentioned before Azure CLI. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) examples outside of Azure CLI, and no references to Linux-specific tools or patterns. The documentation assumes familiarity with PowerShell, which is primarily a Windows tool, although now available on Linux. No Linux-only tools or shell scripting patterns are discussed.
Recommendations
  • Ensure Azure CLI (bash) examples are always presented before or alongside PowerShell, as CLI is more universally available across platforms.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands can be run in bash on Linux/macOS, and provide example shell environments where appropriate.
  • Add a note clarifying that PowerShell is available on Linux, but most Linux users will prefer Azure CLI.
  • Where variables are defined, show both bash (export VAR=...) and PowerShell ($var=...) syntax side-by-side.
  • Consider adding a dedicated section or tab for Linux shell scripting patterns, or reference Linux-specific tools where relevant.
  • Avoid language that implies PowerShell is the default or preferred method unless justified by technical reasons.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-cache-volumes.md ...articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-cache-volumes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily in the feature registration section, where Azure PowerShell commands are presented first and in detail, with Azure CLI (cross-platform) commands only mentioned briefly and as a link. There are no Linux-specific shell examples or references to Linux tools, and the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-centric patterns (PowerShell, AD/NTFS). However, protocol examples (NFS, SMB, dual-protocol, LDAP) are provided, which are platform-neutral, and the API usage is cross-platform.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI command examples for feature registration and status checking, alongside PowerShell, to ensure parity for Linux/macOS users.
  • Where Active Directory is referenced, also mention and provide examples for LDAP integration, including Linux-based directory services.
  • Clarify that all API operations can be performed from any OS (Linux, macOS, Windows) and provide sample curl or bash commands for REST API calls.
  • Ensure that any command-line instructions are presented in both PowerShell and bash/zsh syntax where applicable.
  • Add a note or section highlighting cross-platform support and best practices for Linux administrators.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/includes/netlogon-april-2023.md ...les/azure-netapp-files/includes/netlogon-april-2023.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page references the April 2023 Windows Update and its impact on Netlogon Secure Channel, focusing exclusively on Windows-specific changes. There is no mention of Linux equivalents, tools, or guidance for administrators managing Azure NetApp Files in Linux environments. The customer intent and important notice are both Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Include information on how Linux-based clients or Samba servers are affected by Netlogon protocol changes, if applicable.
  • Provide guidance or examples for administrators using Linux tools to manage Active Directory connections with Azure NetApp Files.
  • Add parity in troubleshooting steps and security recommendations for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Reference any relevant updates or considerations for non-Windows platforms in the context of Azure NetApp Files and Active Directory.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/control-plane-security.md .../articles/azure-netapp-files/control-plane-security.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation consistently references Azure management interfaces (APIs, PowerShell, CLI, Portal) but lists PowerShell before CLI, which can imply a Windows-first approach. There are no concrete command-line examples, but PowerShell is mentioned explicitly while Linux-native tools or shell environments are not. No Linux-specific examples, commands, or patterns are provided, and there is no mention of Bash, Azure CLI usage from Linux, or cross-platform scripting considerations.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention Azure CLI as a cross-platform tool and provide CLI examples alongside or before PowerShell examples.
  • Include sample commands for both PowerShell and Bash/Azure CLI to demonstrate parity.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI and Portal are fully supported on Linux and macOS, not just Windows.
  • Avoid listing PowerShell before CLI when describing management interfaces; consider alphabetical or platform-neutral ordering.
  • Add notes or links for Linux users about installing and using Azure CLI and other relevant tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-application-volume-group-sap-hana-api.md ...les/configure-application-volume-group-sap-hana-api.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Linux First Missing Windows Example
Summary
The documentation exclusively provides examples and instructions using Linux-native tools (bash, curl, jq, az CLI), with no mention of Windows-specific tools, PowerShell, or Windows command-line patterns. All sample scripts and API calls are shown in bash shell script format, and there are no PowerShell equivalents or guidance for Windows users. This indicates a bias toward Linux environments and may make it harder for Windows administrators to follow the documentation without adaptation.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent PowerShell examples for all bash/curl/jq/az CLI commands, showing how to perform the same API calls and JSON manipulations on Windows.
  • Explicitly mention Windows support and provide guidance for running these steps on Windows, including any required tools (e.g., Windows Subsystem for Linux, PowerShell modules, or jq alternatives).
  • Where scripts use jq, suggest Windows-compatible alternatives or provide instructions for installing jq on Windows.
  • Include notes or sections addressing common differences or issues when performing these steps on Windows, such as environment variable syntax, file path formats, and authentication.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting and best practices for both Linux and Windows environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-integration.md ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-integration.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias by mentioning Windows VMs and SMB shares before Linux VMs and NFS volumes in integration scenarios. While both platforms are referenced, examples and instructions for Linux (such as mounting NFS volumes on Linux VMs) are less detailed or absent compared to Windows (e.g., mapping SMB shares on Windows VMs). There are no Linux-specific commands, tools, or step-by-step examples provided, and Windows terminology appears first in several sections.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux examples, such as step-by-step instructions or commands for mounting NFS volumes on Linux VMs.
  • Ensure parity in detail and ordering: mention Linux and Windows platforms equally and alternate which is referenced first.
  • Include references to Linux tools (e.g., mount, nfs-utils) and patterns alongside Windows tools (e.g., net use, PowerShell).
  • Add troubleshooting tips or FAQs specific to Linux environments to match the coverage given to Windows.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-restore-file-client.md ...es/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-restore-file-client.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides both Linux (NFS) and Windows (SMB) client instructions for restoring files from snapshots, with clear parity in step-by-step guidance. However, the Windows section includes additional features (such as the 'Previous Versions' tab) and more visual aids (screenshots), while the Linux section is limited to basic command-line usage without mention of desktop environments or file manager integration. The Windows instructions also reference GUI tools and OS-specific features before their Linux equivalents (which are not mentioned at all), indicating a slight Windows-first and Windows-tools bias.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Linux desktop/file manager instructions (e.g., using Nautilus, Dolphin, or GNOME/KDE file managers to access .snapshot directories) and screenshots to match the Windows GUI steps.
  • Mention and provide guidance for Linux file manager features (such as 'Show Hidden Files') to access the .snapshot directory, similar to the Windows 'Show hidden items' step.
  • If possible, reference Linux tools or desktop environment features that provide snapshot browsing or file restoration, to parallel the Windows 'Previous Versions' functionality.
  • Ensure that both Linux and Windows sections have similar levels of detail and visual aids to provide parity for users on both platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/solutions-benefits-azure-netapp-files-sql-server.md ...es/solutions-benefits-azure-netapp-files-sql-server.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation exclusively discusses SQL Server deployment scenarios, performance, and benchmarking in the context of Windows environments. There are no references to Linux-based SQL Server deployments, nor are there examples or mentions of Linux tools, patterns, or performance characteristics. The article implicitly assumes a Windows context throughout, as evidenced by the focus on SQL Server (which is available on Linux as well), the absence of Linux-specific guidance, and the lack of cross-platform considerations.
Recommendations
  • Include explicit mention of SQL Server on Linux and discuss any differences or considerations when using Azure NetApp Files in Linux environments.
  • Provide performance data or case studies for SQL Server running on Linux VMs with Azure NetApp Files.
  • Add Linux-based benchmarking tools or instructions (e.g., using iostat, sysbench, or other Linux-native tools) alongside or in addition to Windows/Perfmon references.
  • Clarify whether the benefits and configurations described apply equally to both Windows and Linux SQL Server deployments.
  • Offer example commands or configuration steps for both Windows (PowerShell, perfmon) and Linux (bash, monitoring tools) where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/application-volume-group-considerations.md ...etapp-files/application-volume-group-considerations.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-09-02 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a mild Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific documentation and tools before or instead of Linux equivalents. Specifically, the link for creating a Proximity Placement Group (PPG) directs users to a Windows Virtual Machines portal guide, and there are no explicit Linux or cross-platform examples or references. However, the overall content is largely platform-neutral, focusing on Azure concepts rather than OS-specific commands or scripts.
Recommendations
  • Provide links to both Windows and Linux documentation for tasks like creating Proximity Placement Groups (e.g., include /azure/virtual-machines/linux/proximity-placement-groups-portal alongside the Windows link).
  • Where examples or references to VM management are given, clarify that the guidance applies to both Windows and Linux VMs, or provide parallel instructions/examples for both platforms.
  • Review all linked resources to ensure Linux users are equally supported, especially in cross-platform SAP HANA deployments.
  • Explicitly mention that the described procedures are applicable to both Windows and Linux SAP HANA deployments, unless there are platform-specific differences.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/application-volume-group-considerations.md ...etapp-files/application-volume-group-considerations.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-09-01 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific documentation first when describing how to create a Proximity Placement Group (PPG), specifically linking to the Azure portal instructions under a Windows path. There are no Linux-specific examples, links, or references, and the documentation does not mention Linux tools or workflows, even though SAP HANA is commonly deployed on Linux. However, the bias is limited, as most of the content is platform-agnostic and does not provide command-line examples for either OS.
Recommendations
  • When linking to Azure portal instructions, use OS-neutral documentation paths or include both Windows and Linux links (e.g., /azure/virtual-machines/linux/proximity-placement-groups-portal and /azure/virtual-machines/windows/proximity-placement-groups-portal).
  • Explicitly mention that the instructions apply to both Windows and Linux SAP HANA deployments, or clarify any OS-specific considerations.
  • If providing command-line or script examples in the future, ensure parity by including both PowerShell (Windows) and Bash/Azure CLI (Linux) examples.
  • Reference Linux-specific documentation or best practices where relevant, especially since SAP HANA is predominantly deployed on Linux.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 31 of 36 Next →