Azure Netapp Files

252
Total Pages
149
Linux-Friendly Pages
103
Pages with Bias
40.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

896 issues found
Showing 151-175 of 896 flagged pages
Azure Netapp Files Configure a cache volume for Azure NetApp Files ...articles/azure-netapp-files/configure-cache-volumes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias primarily in the feature registration section, where Azure PowerShell commands are presented first and in detail, with Azure CLI commands only mentioned as an alternative in a single sentence. The use of PowerShell syntax and terminology (e.g., Register-AzProviderFeature, Get-AzProviderFeature) is prominent, and the documentation references Active Directory (AD) before LDAP when discussing directory services. There are no explicit Linux shell examples or references to Linux-specific tools or patterns, and Windows-centric terminology (NTFS, SMB) is used before UNIX/NFS in some protocol discussions.
Recommendations
  • Present Azure CLI commands alongside PowerShell examples, with full syntax and output examples, not just links.
  • Where directory services are discussed, mention LDAP before or alongside Active Directory, and provide parity in configuration examples.
  • Ensure protocol and security style tables and explanations alternate or balance UNIX/NFS and NTFS/SMB terminology, rather than listing Windows-centric options first.
  • Add explicit Linux shell examples for API calls (e.g., using curl or az CLI), especially in sections showing PUT, PATCH, and DELETE requests.
  • Review documentation for terminology order and ensure Linux/UNIX patterns are not consistently listed after Windows/AD/SMB patterns.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Enable Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) LDAP authentication for NFS volumes ...s/azure-netapp-files/configure-ldap-extended-groups.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by focusing almost exclusively on Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) and Microsoft Entra Domain Services for LDAP, with explicit statements that OpenLDAP and other third-party LDAP servers are not supported. Examples and screenshots use Windows tools (Multi-valued String Editor, Active Directory Attribute Editor, MMC snap-in), and instructions for managing POSIX attributes are given only for Windows environments. Linux-specific instructions are limited to brief mentions (e.g., editing /etc/idmapd.conf), with no detailed Linux LDAP server configuration or attribute management examples. Windows tools and patterns are mentioned first and exclusively in most sections.
Recommendations
  • Add examples and instructions for managing POSIX attributes on Linux LDAP servers (such as OpenLDAP), even if not officially supported, to help users understand the mapping and potential workarounds.
  • Provide parity in screenshots and step-by-step guides for Linux environments, such as using ldapmodify, ldapadd, or phpldapadmin to set user/group attributes.
  • Clarify the limitations and rationale for Windows-only LDAP support, and suggest alternatives or migration paths for organizations using Linux-based LDAP.
  • Where possible, mention Linux tools and patterns alongside Windows ones, rather than only after or not at all.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and common errors for Linux clients in more detail, especially around POSIX attribute mapping and NFS access.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Configure network features for an Azure NetApp Files volume ...icles/azure-netapp-files/configure-network-features.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. PowerShell examples are given for feature registration and volume management, and PowerShell is mentioned before CLI and REST API alternatives. Windows-centric tools and patterns (PowerShell, Azure Portal GUI) are emphasized, while Linux-native workflows (e.g., Bash scripting, Linux CLI usage) are less prominent. Although Azure CLI and REST API examples are included, PowerShell commands are often presented first or in greater detail. There are no explicit Linux shell or Bash examples, and no mention of Linux-specific tooling or considerations.
Recommendations
  • Provide Bash/Linux shell examples for all CLI commands, especially for feature registration and volume management.
  • Present Azure CLI examples before PowerShell examples, or side-by-side, to avoid Windows-first ordering.
  • Explicitly mention Linux compatibility and any differences in workflow for Linux users.
  • Include notes or sections on using the documentation from Linux environments, such as running Azure CLI in Bash or using REST API with curl.
  • Ensure parity in detail and troubleshooting steps for both PowerShell and CLI/REST API workflows.
  • Reference Linux-native tools (e.g., curl, jq) where appropriate, and provide example commands.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Create volume replication for Azure NetApp Files ...etapp-files/cross-region-replication-create-peering.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias primarily in the feature registration section, where Azure PowerShell commands are presented first and in detail, with only a brief mention of Azure CLI as an alternative. No Linux-specific examples or shell commands are provided, and the step-by-step instructions assume use of the Azure portal or PowerShell, which are more familiar to Windows users. There is no parity in showing Linux command-line workflows or referencing Linux tools.
Recommendations
  • Provide full Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell, with equal detail and step-by-step instructions.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and suitable for Linux/macOS users.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output from Linux environments where relevant.
  • Add notes or sections for Linux users, such as how to copy resource IDs using Linux tools or shell commands.
  • Ensure that any automation or scripting examples are available in both PowerShell and Bash/shell formats.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand default and individual user and group quotas for Azure NetApp Files volumes ...s/default-individual-user-group-quotas-introduction.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page displays a mild Windows bias. In the 'Observing user quota settings and consumption' section, Windows client instructions (Windows Explorer, dir command) are presented before Linux client instructions (quota command). Windows-specific tools and concepts (Windows Explorer, dir, Security Identifiers) are mentioned explicitly, while Linux equivalents are referenced more briefly. There is no mention of PowerShell, but the overall pattern prioritizes Windows terminology and examples. Linux instructions are present but less detailed, and group quota reporting limitations are explained only for Linux clients.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows client instructions in parallel or alternate order to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • Expand Linux client instructions to include more detailed examples, such as using additional commands (e.g., 'repquota', 'df', or 'getfacl') for quota observation.
  • Reference Linux identity concepts (UID/GID) with equal prominence to Windows SIDs, including links to relevant documentation.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and error messages for both platforms, not just Linux (e.g., what Windows users see when group quota is exceeded).
  • Ensure parity in screenshots and example scenarios for both Windows and Linux clients.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Convert an NFS volume between NFSv3 and NFSv4.1 with Azure NetApp Files ...in/articles/azure-netapp-files/convert-nfsv3-nfsv41.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias primarily in the feature registration section, where Azure PowerShell commands are presented first and in detail, with Azure CLI commands only briefly mentioned as an alternative. The registration examples use PowerShell syntax, which is native to Windows, and there is no mention of Bash or Linux shell equivalents. The rest of the documentation, especially the conversion steps, is Linux-focused, using Linux mount commands and references to Linux client configuration, but the initial setup and registration instructions favor Windows tooling.
Recommendations
  • Provide Azure CLI examples for feature registration and status checking alongside PowerShell, with equal prominence and detail.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands can be run natively on Linux/macOS and in Windows, while PowerShell is typically Windows-centric.
  • Consider presenting CLI and PowerShell examples side-by-side or in tabs, rather than listing PowerShell first.
  • Add notes or links for installing and using Azure CLI on Linux systems.
  • Review other sections for subtle Windows-first language or assumptions, and ensure parity in tool references.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Create and manage Active Directory connections for Azure NetApp Files ...re-netapp-files/create-active-directory-connections.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. Most command-line examples for managing Active Directory connections use PowerShell, with no equivalent Linux or cross-platform commands provided. Windows-specific tools and concepts (Group Policy, registry keys, Windows Server, AD DS) are referenced exclusively or before mentioning any Linux alternatives. There is a lack of Linux-focused guidance for Active Directory integration, especially for Kerberos and LDAP operations, and no examples using Linux-native tools (such as kinit, ldapsearch, or samba utilities).
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux command-line examples for relevant operations, such as configuring Kerberos encryption types, joining AD domains, and troubleshooting LDAP/Kerberos issues (e.g., using kinit, ldapsearch, realm, or samba-tool).
  • Include references to Linux tools and configuration files (e.g., /etc/krb5.conf, /etc/ldap.conf, sssd, winbind) alongside Windows tools like PowerShell and Group Policy.
  • Add parity in troubleshooting steps and best practices for both Windows and Linux environments, especially for NFS/Kerberos scenarios.
  • Explicitly mention Linux equivalents when discussing Windows features (e.g., how to configure Kerberos encryption types on Linux clients).
  • Reorder sections or examples so that Linux and Windows approaches are presented together, or alternate which platform is discussed first.
  • Clarify which steps are platform-agnostic and which require OS-specific actions, and provide links to Linux documentation where appropriate.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Create a dual-protocol volume for Azure NetApp Files ...les/azure-netapp-files/create-volumes-dual-protocol.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas: Active Directory management is described exclusively using Windows tools (MMC snap-in, Windows Administrative Tools), with no mention of Linux-based LDAP management tools or workflows. The only example for editing POSIX attributes is via the Windows Attribute Editor, and instructions for accessing it are Windows-specific. There are no Linux or cross-platform examples for managing LDAP attributes, nor are Linux tools (such as ldapmodify, phpldapadmin, or CLI utilities) mentioned. The order of presentation also places Windows-centric workflows before Linux alternatives, which are missing.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions and examples for managing LDAP POSIX attributes using Linux tools (e.g., ldapmodify, ldapadd, phpldapadmin, or command-line utilities).
  • Include screenshots or step-by-step guides for Linux-based workflows to edit user/group attributes in LDAP directories.
  • Mention cross-platform or open-source LDAP management tools and how they can be used for the same tasks described for Windows.
  • Ensure that examples and instructions for both Windows and Linux environments are presented in parallel, or at least reference Linux alternatives where Windows tools are mentioned.
  • Clarify that Active Directory management can be performed from non-Windows systems and provide links or references to relevant documentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand dual-protocol security style and permission behaviors in Azure NetApp Files ...ure-netapp-files/dual-protocol-permission-behaviors.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a moderate Windows bias. Windows/NTFS concepts and tools are introduced before their Linux/UNIX equivalents, and Windows terminology (NTFS, SID, Active Directory, Windows RPC) is used extensively. Linux/NFS concepts are described, but there is a lack of parity in example depth and tool references (e.g., no Linux GUI management options, only CLI tools mentioned for NFS ACLs). The documentation also references Windows tools and patterns (Active Directory, NTFS ACLs) more thoroughly, while Linux/NFS examples are limited to basic commands and lack detailed walkthroughs.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/NFS management examples with equivalent detail to Windows/NTFS, including both CLI and any available GUI tools.
  • Introduce Linux/NFS concepts and tools alongside or before Windows/NTFS equivalents to avoid ordering bias.
  • Expand references to Linux identity sources (e.g., LDAP, local users/groups) and clarify limitations and alternatives for Linux environments.
  • Include troubleshooting scenarios and permission mapping examples for both Linux and Windows clients, ensuring equal coverage.
  • Reference Linux documentation and best practices as thoroughly as Windows/Active Directory resources.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Enable Continuous Availability on existing Azure NetApp Files SMB volumes ...p-files/enable-continuous-availability-existing-SMB.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias by exclusively referencing Windows systems and tools. All verification steps use PowerShell commands, and instructions specifically mention rebooting Windows systems. There is no mention of Linux or macOS clients, nor are alternative verification methods provided for non-Windows platforms. The documentation assumes the administrator is working in a Windows environment and does not address cross-platform scenarios.
Recommendations
  • Include instructions for verifying SMB Continuous Availability from Linux and macOS clients, such as using smbclient or mount.cifs.
  • Clarify whether rebooting is required for non-Windows systems and provide guidance for those platforms.
  • Add examples of how to check SMB CA status on Linux (e.g., using smbstatus or examining mount options).
  • Mention any platform-specific limitations or considerations for SMB CA on non-Windows clients.
  • Reorder instructions to avoid assuming Windows as the default environment, or explicitly state platform applicability.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Disable showmount in Azure NetApp Files .../main/articles/azure-netapp-files/disable-showmount.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page primarily provides Azure PowerShell examples for registering and unregistering the disable showmount feature, with only a brief mention of Azure CLI as an alternative. The examples and instructions are presented in a way that favors Windows users, as PowerShell is the default and no explicit Linux shell (bash) or CLI examples are shown. There are no Linux-specific instructions or screenshots, and the workflow assumes familiarity with Windows tooling.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Azure CLI command examples for registering, checking, and unregistering the feature, formatted for bash/zsh shells.
  • Include instructions or notes for Linux/macOS users, clarifying how to perform the same operations from non-Windows environments.
  • Present CLI and PowerShell examples side-by-side, or list CLI first to avoid Windows-first ordering.
  • Add screenshots or interface descriptions relevant to Linux/macOS users where applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand Domain Name Systems in Azure NetApp Files ...icles/azure-netapp-files/domain-name-system-concept.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: Windows/Active Directory DNS is consistently presented as the default or recommended option, with Microsoft best practices and tools referenced first and most frequently. Examples and screenshots for DNS management and record viewing are almost exclusively from Windows environments (e.g., DNS Manager, C:\> nslookup), with Linux alternatives mentioned only secondarily or briefly. Some operational details (like secure DDNS) are described as supported only with Microsoft Active Directory DNS servers, and manual record creation instructions reference Windows DNS tools and patterns. Linux/BIND and dig are mentioned, but not given equal prominence or practical guidance.
Recommendations
  • Provide equal, side-by-side examples for both Windows and Linux/BIND environments throughout the documentation, including screenshots and command-line instructions.
  • Clearly state when features are Windows-only and offer Linux/BIND alternatives or workarounds where possible.
  • Include practical guidance for managing DNS records, scavenging, and dynamic DNS in Linux/BIND environments, not just Windows DNS Manager.
  • Reference Linux/BIND documentation and best practices alongside Microsoft/Windows links.
  • Avoid presenting Windows/Active Directory DNS as the default or only recommended option; instead, discuss both platforms neutrally and highlight differences.
  • Add troubleshooting steps and packet capture examples using Linux tools (e.g., tcpdump, Wireshark on Linux) in addition to Windows tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Application resilience FAQs for Azure NetApp Files ...icles/azure-netapp-files/faq-application-resilience.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. SMB/Windows-specific features (such as SMB Transparent Failover and Continuous Availability) are discussed in detail, with explicit mention of supported Windows workloads and exclusion of Linux equivalents (e.g., 'Microsoft SQL Server (not Linux SQL Server)'). In the Boomi section, recommendations for SMB are tied to Windows VMs, while NFS is recommended for Linux VMs, but the SMB guidance is more detailed. There are no PowerShell-heavy examples, but Windows tools and patterns are mentioned before or instead of Linux equivalents, and Linux-specific examples are less detailed or missing in some sections.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux examples and guidance where Windows/SMB features are discussed, especially for workloads like SQL Server and FSLogix.
  • Clarify Linux support for SMB Continuous Availability and explicitly state whether Linux SMB clients are supported or not.
  • Balance recommendations for Boomi by offering more detailed NFS/Linux configuration steps, not just referencing Windows/SMB.
  • Where Windows tools or patterns are mentioned, include Linux alternatives (e.g., mounting SMB volumes on Linux, using Linux-based HA solutions).
  • Ensure that examples and best practices for both NFS and SMB protocols are equally detailed for both Windows and Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files NFS FAQs for Azure NetApp Files ...-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-nfs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias in the section addressing NFS volume access from Windows clients. It provides explicit PowerShell commands and Windows mounting examples, but does not offer equivalent Linux commands or examples for troubleshooting NFS client performance. The Windows-specific guidance appears before any Linux troubleshooting, and Linux tools or patterns are not mentioned in this context.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Linux troubleshooting steps for NFS client performance issues, such as tuning mount options or using relevant Linux commands (e.g., 'mount', 'nfsstat', 'showmount').
  • Provide Linux-specific examples alongside Windows examples, especially in sections where PowerShell commands are given.
  • Ensure that Linux tools and patterns (e.g., editing /etc/fstab, using systemd automount, or NFS client configuration files) are mentioned with equal prominence.
  • Where Windows-specific issues are discussed, include a parallel section for common Linux client issues and their solutions.
  • Review the ordering of examples and guidance to avoid presenting Windows solutions before Linux equivalents unless contextually justified.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files SMB FAQs for Azure NetApp Files ...-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/faq-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page for Azure NetApp Files SMB FAQs demonstrates a strong Windows bias. Most examples, tools, and references are specific to Windows environments, such as Windows Server, Active Directory, Microsoft Management Console (MMC), and Windows updates. There are no examples or guidance for Linux clients, Samba, or cross-platform SMB access. Windows terminology and tools are mentioned exclusively or before any Linux equivalents, and troubleshooting steps are Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Add examples and instructions for connecting to Azure NetApp Files SMB shares from Linux clients (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or Nautilus).
  • Include troubleshooting steps relevant to Linux environments, such as checking Kerberos or NTLM authentication from Linux.
  • Mention Samba and its compatibility with Azure NetApp Files SMB shares.
  • Provide parity in tool references, such as alternatives to MMC for Linux (e.g., smbstatus, smbclient, or command-line utilities).
  • Clarify which features or limitations apply to non-Windows clients.
  • Add notes about cross-platform interoperability, including any known issues or configuration requirements for Linux/Unix systems.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand SMB file permissions in Azure NetApp Files ...-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on Windows concepts and tools, specifically NTFS ACLs, without mentioning Linux equivalents or cross-platform considerations. All references and examples are Windows-centric, and there is no discussion of how SMB permissions might be managed or interpreted from Linux clients or with Linux tools.
Recommendations
  • Include examples or explanations of how SMB permissions interact with Linux clients, such as using 'smbclient', 'mount.cifs', or 'getfacl' on Linux.
  • Discuss differences in permission mapping between NTFS ACLs and POSIX ACLs, and how Azure NetApp Files handles these scenarios.
  • Provide links to Linux documentation or tools for managing SMB shares and permissions.
  • Add a section on troubleshooting SMB permissions from Linux systems.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Monitor the capacity of an Azure NetApp Files volume ...articles/azure-netapp-files/monitor-volume-capacity.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation presents Windows examples and tools before Linux equivalents, with more detailed steps and screenshots for Windows (File Explorer, dir command) than for Linux (only df -h). Windows-specific tools and patterns (File Explorer, dir) are mentioned explicitly, while Linux coverage is more limited. REST API usage references PowerShell, reinforcing a Windows-centric approach.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows examples in parallel or alternate their order to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Expand Linux examples to include additional commands (e.g., ls, stat, ncdu) and GUI tools if applicable.
  • Provide REST API usage examples with Linux-native tools (e.g., curl, jq) alongside PowerShell.
  • Clarify cross-platform equivalence for monitoring tasks and ensure parity in detail and screenshots.
  • Mention and link to Linux-specific documentation or troubleshooting guides where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Modify an Active Directory Connection for Azure NetApp Files ...re-netapp-files/modify-active-directory-connections.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on modifying Active Directory connections for Azure NetApp Files, with terminology, examples, and references that are Windows-centric. It references Windows tools and concepts (Active Directory, SMB, Kerberos, LDAP signing via group policy, Organizational Unit paths in AD, SQL Server) and omits Linux-specific examples, tools, or workflows. There are no Linux command-line examples, nor is there mention of how Linux administrators might interact with these settings or validate them using Linux tools.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-specific examples for modifying and validating Active Directory connections, such as using 'ldapsearch', 'kinit', or 'smbclient' from Linux.
  • Include guidance for Linux administrators on how to remount NFS Kerberos volumes after changes, with Linux commands.
  • Mention Linux equivalents for group policy changes (e.g., how to ensure LDAP signing from Linux clients).
  • Clarify how Linux-based systems interact with Azure NetApp Files in AD-integrated scenarios, especially for NFS and Kerberos.
  • Add troubleshooting steps or validation commands for both Windows and Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files What's new in Azure NetApp Files ...ocs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/whats-new.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure NetApp Files demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows-centric features, terminology, and tools (such as SMB, Active Directory, Windows Server, Windows File Explorer, and NTFS) are frequently mentioned, often before or in more detail than their Linux/NFS equivalents. Several features (e.g., Access-based Enumeration, Non-browsable shares, SMB Continuous Availability, integration with Windows Server 2025 domain controllers) are described primarily in the context of Windows environments, sometimes with little or no mention of Linux alternatives or usage patterns. Examples and troubleshooting guidance tend to reference Windows tools and workflows, with limited Linux-specific instructions or parity in example coverage.
Recommendations
  • Ensure that Linux/NFS features and workflows are described with equal prominence and detail as Windows/SMB features.
  • Provide Linux-specific examples and troubleshooting steps alongside Windows ones, especially for features that are protocol-agnostic or dual-protocol.
  • When introducing features that are available for both SMB and NFS, present both usage patterns and configuration steps in parallel, rather than focusing on Windows first.
  • Include references to Linux tools (e.g., nfs-utils, mount, ls, chown, showmount) and common Linux administration patterns where relevant.
  • Highlight integration with Linux identity management solutions (such as FreeIPA, OpenLDAP) and provide guidance for Linux-based authentication and access control.
  • Review feature descriptions to ensure that Linux terminology (e.g., POSIX, UID/GID, NFSv4.1, Kerberos) is used and explained where appropriate.
  • Add troubleshooting and operational guidance for Linux environments, including common error scenarios and resolution steps.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files azure-netapp-files-create-volumes-smb.md ...e-netapp-files/includes/smb-continuous-availability.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by focusing exclusively on Windows workloads (Citrix, FSLogix, MSIX app attach, SQL Server on Windows) and explicitly stating that Linux SQL Server is not supported. All examples and guidance are tailored to Windows environments, with no mention of Linux equivalents or alternative Linux-compatible solutions. Additionally, Windows-specific tools and privileges (e.g., Active Directory, SeSecurityPrivilege) are referenced without Linux alternatives.
Recommendations
  • Clearly state Linux support status for all workloads, not just SQL Server.
  • Provide guidance or alternatives for Linux environments where possible, or link to relevant Linux documentation.
  • If features are Windows-only, explain technical reasons and roadmap for Linux parity.
  • Include examples or notes for Linux administrators, such as supported protocols, configuration steps, or limitations.
  • Reference Linux authentication and privilege management tools if applicable, or clarify that only Windows tools are supported.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand volume languages in Azure NetApp Files ...cles/azure-netapp-files/understand-volume-languages.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows tools (Explorer, PowerShell, CMD, Notepad, Notepad++) are frequently mentioned first or exclusively, especially in sections about encoding conversion, file viewing, and font settings. PowerShell examples are provided for encoding conversion, while equivalent Linux commands (iconv, file) are mentioned later or less prominently. Windows-specific troubleshooting (fonts, region settings, chcp) is detailed, but Linux troubleshooting (locale, font issues) is less explored. Some examples and screenshots focus on Windows environments without always providing parallel Linux examples.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux command-line examples (e.g., iconv, file, locale, stat) alongside or before Windows/PowerShell examples in all relevant sections.
  • Include troubleshooting steps for Linux clients (e.g., font configuration, locale settings, terminal encoding issues) similar to the detail given for Windows.
  • Add screenshots of Linux tools (e.g., GNOME Files, KDE Dolphin, terminal output) where Windows Explorer or PowerShell screenshots are shown.
  • Mention Linux text editors (e.g., Vim, Gedit, nano) for viewing and changing file encodings, not just Notepad/Notepad++.
  • Ensure that best practices and tips are equally applicable to both Windows and Linux environments, and clarify any OS-specific limitations.
  • Where Windows tools (chcp, PowerShell ISE, Windows Terminal) are referenced, provide Linux equivalents (locale, terminal settings, etc.) in parallel.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand Kerberos in Azure NetApp Files ...docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/kerberos.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: Windows terminology and tools (Active Directory, MMC, PowerShell, setspn) are referenced first and most extensively, with Linux equivalents (such as kadmin, ktutil, or direct keytab management) rarely or never mentioned. Examples and workflows for managing Kerberos principals and SPNs focus on Windows tools and patterns, and there is a lack of concrete Linux command-line examples for tasks like keytab creation, SPN management, or troubleshooting. The documentation assumes a Microsoft-centric KDC environment and omits guidance for Linux administrators who may need to interact with Azure NetApp Files Kerberos features.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-focused examples for Kerberos principal and keytab management (e.g., using kadmin, ktutil, and editing krb5.conf).
  • Include Linux command-line workflows for SPN creation, troubleshooting, and ticket inspection (e.g., klist, kvno).
  • Reference Linux tools and configuration files (krb5.conf, keytab) alongside Windows tools, not just as afterthoughts.
  • Provide parity in troubleshooting guidance, including common Linux error messages and log locations.
  • Explicitly mention and document how Linux clients interact with Azure NetApp Files Kerberos, including hostname truncation and SPN mapping issues.
  • Balance references to Windows and Linux in terminology and workflow sections, ensuring both audiences are supported.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand name mapping using LDAP in Azure NetApp Files ...https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol-name-mapping.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates bias toward Windows by exclusively describing the name mapping configuration process using Windows tools (Active Directory Users and Computers MMC) and referencing Windows-specific UI elements (Attribute Editor tab). There are no instructions or examples for performing equivalent LDAP user attribute modifications on Linux systems, such as using ldapmodify, LDIF files, or Linux-based LDAP management tools. The configuration workflow is presented from a Windows perspective, with Linux only shown as a result (ownership mapping), not as a platform for configuration.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions and examples for modifying LDAP user attributes on Linux, such as using ldapmodify, LDIF files, or Linux LDAP management tools (e.g., Apache Directory Studio, phpldapadmin).
  • Present both Windows and Linux workflows for configuring asymmetric name mapping, ideally side-by-side.
  • Avoid referencing only Windows-specific tools; mention cross-platform or Linux-native alternatives where possible.
  • Ensure screenshots and step-by-step guides are available for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Clarify that the configuration can be performed from either platform, depending on the LDAP server and administrative tools available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand lightweight directory access protocol (LDAP) basics in Azure NetApp Files ...-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by prioritizing Microsoft Active Directory as the primary LDAP server, frequently referencing Windows-specific tools and terminology (such as nslookup with Windows syntax), and providing examples using Windows command-line tools before mentioning Linux equivalents. Linux/UNIX alternatives (e.g., FreeIPA, OpenLDAP) are referenced only in a note and not integrated into the main narrative or examples. There is a lack of parity in practical examples and configuration guidance for Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux/UNIX-focused examples and configuration steps alongside Windows/Active Directory instructions (e.g., show dig and ldapsearch usage for querying LDAP records).
  • Present FreeIPA, OpenLDAP, and Red Hat Directory Server as first-class supported options, not just in a note, and provide equivalent setup and troubleshooting guidance.
  • Balance references to Microsoft Active Directory with equivalent details for popular Linux LDAP servers, including schema extension and security configuration.
  • For command-line examples, always provide both Windows and Linux syntax side-by-side.
  • Clarify any Azure NetApp Files limitations or differences for Linux LDAP servers in the main text, not just in footnotes or notes.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand LDAP schemas in Azure NetApp Files ...files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol-schemas.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. It exclusively references Microsoft Active Directory as the LDAP server, describes schema attributes and indexing in terms of AD defaults, and provides configuration instructions only for AD using Windows tools (ADSI Edit). There are no examples or guidance for configuring equivalent LDAP schemas or attribute indexing in Linux-based LDAP servers (such as OpenLDAP), nor is there mention of Linux tools or methods. Windows terminology and management patterns are presented first and exclusively.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent examples and instructions for Linux-based LDAP servers (e.g., OpenLDAP), including how to configure schema attributes and indexing.
  • Mention and describe Linux tools (such as ldapmodify, slapd, or phpldapadmin) for managing LDAP schemas and attributes.
  • Provide parity in attribute indexing guidance, showing how to optimize performance in non-AD LDAP environments.
  • Clarify that Azure NetApp Files supports LDAP servers other than Active Directory, if applicable, and note any differences or requirements.
  • Balance references to Windows and Linux environments throughout the documentation, ensuring both are addressed in examples and configuration steps.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 7 of 36 Next →