Azure Netapp Files

252
Total Pages
149
Linux-Friendly Pages
103
Pages with Bias
40.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

896 issues found
Showing 176-200 of 896 flagged pages
Azure Netapp Files Manage default and individual user and group quotas for Azure NetApp Files volumes ...p-files/manage-default-individual-user-group-quotas.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing quota target format examples for SMB (Windows) volumes before NFS (Linux/UNIX) volumes, and by referencing Windows-specific SID formats for user quotas without offering equivalent Linux user/group ID examples. There are no command-line or tool-based examples for Linux environments, and the documentation does not mention Linux tools or patterns for quota management, focusing instead on Azure portal GUI instructions and Windows-centric identifiers.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux/NFS user and group ID examples alongside Windows SID formats for quota targets.
  • Include CLI or script-based examples for managing quotas using Linux tools (e.g., using Azure CLI, REST API, or NetApp ONTAP CLI) to complement the portal-based instructions.
  • Ensure that NFS/Linux patterns and terminology are presented with equal prominence to SMB/Windows examples, including in lists and explanations.
  • Add troubleshooting or usage notes relevant to Linux environments, such as mapping between UNIX UIDs/GIDs and quota rules.
  • Review screenshots and UI instructions to ensure they are not exclusively Windows-centric and clarify any differences for Linux/NFS users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Manage Azure NetApp Files storage with cool access ...main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-cool-access.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: PowerShell commands are presented as the primary method for feature registration, with Azure CLI only mentioned secondarily and without explicit examples. The step-by-step instructions for enabling cool access on capacity pools and volumes are written from the perspective of using the Azure Portal GUI, which is most familiar to Windows users. There are no Linux-specific command-line examples, nor is there mention of Linux-native tooling or patterns. The documentation does not provide parity for Linux users who may prefer Bash scripting or command-line workflows.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI command examples alongside PowerShell for all registration and configuration steps.
  • Include Bash shell script examples for common operations, especially for enabling/disabling cool access and modifying configuration.
  • Add guidance for managing Azure NetApp Files via automation tools commonly used on Linux (e.g., Terraform, Ansible, REST API via curl).
  • Ensure that instructions for GUI actions clarify that the Azure Portal is cross-platform and not Windows-specific.
  • Where screenshots are used, consider including examples from both Windows and Linux environments (e.g., Azure Cloud Shell in Bash mode).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Manage file access logs in Azure NetApp Files ...articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-file-access-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. Instructions for setting SACLs for SMB shares are exclusively provided for Windows administration hosts, with detailed GUI steps. There is no equivalent Linux example for managing SMB SACLs, nor any mention of Linux tools for this purpose. The Windows steps are presented first and in more detail, while the NFS (Linux) instructions are brief and refer to a separate page for actual steps. There is also an explicit note that Audit ACLs for dual-protocol volumes with NTFS security style must be set from a Windows machine, reinforcing the Windows-centric approach.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux command-line examples for managing SMB SACLs, such as using 'smbcacls' or other Samba tools.
  • Include Linux-based instructions for setting audit ACLs on dual-protocol volumes where possible.
  • Present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel tabs or sections to ensure parity and equal prominence.
  • Reference Linux tools and patterns (e.g., setfacl, nfs4_setfacl) alongside Windows tools.
  • Clarify any protocol or platform limitations, but avoid implying Windows is the default or preferred environment.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Manage SMB share ACLs in Azure NetApp Files ...-netapp-files/manage-smb-share-access-control-lists.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation exclusively describes managing SMB share ACLs using Windows-based tools and interfaces, such as Windows Explorer and Microsoft Management Console (MMC). All examples and screenshots are Windows-centric, with no mention of Linux or cross-platform alternatives for viewing or modifying SMB share ACLs. This creates a strong Windows bias and may exclude users who administer Azure NetApp Files from non-Windows environments.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent instructions for managing SMB share ACLs from Linux systems, such as using smbclient, smbcacls, or other Samba tools.
  • Include examples and screenshots of Linux command-line tools where possible.
  • Clarify whether any operations (viewing or modifying ACLs) are possible from Linux or if there are limitations, and document those explicitly.
  • If only Windows tools are supported, state this clearly at the beginning and suggest workarounds or alternatives for Linux users.
  • Consider adding a comparison table of available management options for both Windows and Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Migrate volumes to Azure NetApp Files ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/migrate-volumes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by providing a PowerShell migration assistant workflow sample script as the only explicit example for scripting the migration process, mentioning PowerShell before Azure CLI, and using Azure PowerShell commands for feature registration and status checking. While Azure CLI is briefly referenced, no Linux shell or bash examples are provided, and the scripting guidance is focused on Windows/PowerShell tools. There are no Linux-specific instructions, nor are Linux-native tools or workflows discussed.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent sample scripts for Linux environments, such as bash or Python, and link to them alongside the PowerShell example.
  • Present Azure CLI commands before or alongside PowerShell commands for feature registration and status checking, with full command examples.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility and provide guidance for users on Linux or macOS systems.
  • Include notes or sections highlighting how Linux users can perform migration tasks, including any differences in prerequisites or tooling.
  • Ensure that all command-line instructions are available in both PowerShell and bash/Azure CLI formats.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Ways to monitor Azure NetApp Files ...icles/azure-netapp-files/monitor-azure-netapp-files.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page shows a mild Windows bias. In the 'Azure Activity log' section, PowerShell is mentioned explicitly as a way to retrieve logs, but Linux equivalents (such as Bash/Azure CLI) are not mentioned with equal prominence or example. The capacity monitoring section mentions both Windows and Linux clients, but does not provide specific Linux commands or examples. There are no Linux-specific tools or patterns highlighted, and examples are generally missing for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI (bash) examples alongside PowerShell for retrieving Activity logs.
  • Include Linux-specific commands (e.g., df, du, stat) for monitoring capacity utilization at the VM level.
  • Ensure that any references to tools or commands are presented in a cross-platform manner, listing both Windows and Linux options equally.
  • Add sample scripts or screenshots for Linux environments where applicable.
  • Review all sections to ensure Linux users have clear, actionable guidance matching that provided for Windows users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NAS protocols in Azure NetApp Files ...ure-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-protocols.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a moderate Windows bias. SMB (Windows protocol) is described with more official support and detail, and Windows tools/patterns (Active Directory, NTFS ACLs) are referenced as defaults. Linux equivalents (Samba, POSIX ACLs) are mentioned but often as secondary or unofficial options. Examples and instructions are generally Windows-centric, with Linux usage described as possible but less supported. There are no explicit Linux command examples for SMB, and Active Directory is presented as the primary identity provider, with LDAP as an alternative.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux/Samba usage examples for SMB, including configuration and authentication steps.
  • Clarify official support status for Linux SMB clients and offer troubleshooting guidance for common Linux scenarios.
  • Present Linux/UNIX tools and patterns (e.g., POSIX ACLs, LDAP) alongside Windows equivalents, not as secondary options.
  • Include Linux command-line examples for both NFS and SMB where relevant (e.g., mounting, permission management).
  • Discuss identity management options for Linux environments (e.g., LDAP, Kerberos) with equal prominence to Active Directory.
  • Ensure documentation sections alternate or balance Windows and Linux perspectives, rather than defaulting to Windows-first language.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Access an Azure NetApp Files object REST API-enabled volume with S3-compatible clients ...articles/azure-netapp-files/object-rest-api-browser.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric instructions and tools. The certificate installation steps exclusively describe the Windows GUI workflow, with no mention of Linux or macOS alternatives. S3 Browser, a Windows-only tool, is featured as the primary GUI client, while no Linux-compatible GUI clients are suggested. Although AWS CLI installation is covered for both Windows and Linux, the overall flow and examples favor Windows environments.
Recommendations
  • Add certificate installation instructions for Linux (e.g., using update-ca-certificates or certutil) and macOS (e.g., Keychain Access).
  • Include examples of Linux-compatible S3 GUI clients (such as Cyberduck, s3cmd, or rclone) and provide setup steps for these tools.
  • Present installation instructions for AWS CLI for Windows and Linux in parallel, rather than listing Windows first.
  • Where possible, use platform-neutral language and structure sections to avoid prioritizing Windows workflows.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform considerations and provide parity in troubleshooting and verification steps for all major operating systems.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NAS file permissions in Azure NetApp Files ...zure-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by describing SMB/Windows permission inheritance first and in more detail, including a screenshot of the Windows interface. Windows-specific tools and UI patterns are mentioned (e.g., 'advanced permission view'), while Linux/NFS equivalents are described more abstractly and without visual aids or command-line examples. There are no Linux shell or NFS ACL command examples, and the practical management of NFS permissions is not illustrated.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux/NFS command-line examples for managing file and folder permissions (e.g., using chmod, setfacl, getfacl, chown).
  • Include screenshots or step-by-step instructions for managing NFS permissions on Linux systems, similar to the Windows example.
  • Present NFS/Linux procedures before or alongside Windows/SMB procedures to avoid 'windows_first' ordering.
  • Describe Linux/NFS permission inheritance mechanisms in more detail, including practical examples (e.g., using setgid, umask, NFSv4 ACLs).
  • Ensure parity in visual aids and depth of explanation for both Windows and Linux/NFS environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NAS share permissions in Azure NetApp Files ...e-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-permissions.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias in several areas. SMB share management is described exclusively via Windows tools (MMC console, Windows Explorer), with no mention of Linux or cross-platform methods for managing SMB share ACLs or accessing SMB shares. Examples and screenshots for SMB features (access-based enumeration, nonbrowsable shares, SMB3 encryption) are all shown in Windows environments, and instructions reference Windows-specific patterns (e.g., 'net view', Windows file paths). There are no Linux or macOS examples for SMB share access, enumeration, or ACL management, and no mention of Linux tools (such as smbclient, mount.cifs, or setfacl) for interacting with SMB shares.
Recommendations
  • Add examples and screenshots demonstrating SMB share access, enumeration, and ACL management from Linux clients (using smbclient, mount.cifs, setfacl, etc.).
  • Include instructions for managing SMB share permissions and properties from non-Windows environments, if supported.
  • Reference cross-platform tools and patterns for SMB share management, not just Windows MMC or Explorer.
  • Clarify whether features like access-based enumeration and nonbrowsable shares are visible or manageable from Linux/macOS clients.
  • Provide parity in documentation structure by presenting Linux and Windows methods side-by-side where possible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand NFS group memberships and supplemental groups for Azure NetApp Files ...-netapp-files/network-file-system-group-memberships.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing on Microsoft Active Directory LDAP implementation, referencing Windows group membership logic, and providing examples and screenshots exclusively from Windows tools (such as ldp.exe and Windows group member fields). There are no examples or instructions for equivalent Linux LDAP servers (such as OpenLDAP), nor are Linux tools or patterns (like getent, ldapsearch, or nslcd) mentioned.
Recommendations
  • Add parallel examples and screenshots for Linux-based LDAP servers (e.g., OpenLDAP), showing how group membership and supplemental groups are managed and queried.
  • Include instructions and sample commands using common Linux tools (e.g., ldapsearch, getent group, nslcd configuration) to demonstrate how to view and manage NFS group memberships.
  • Clarify that Azure NetApp Files can integrate with non-Windows LDAP servers and provide guidance for those scenarios.
  • Present both Windows and Linux approaches side-by-side in relevant sections, rather than focusing exclusively or first on Windows.
  • Reference documentation for Linux LDAP server configuration and troubleshooting in the 'Next steps' section.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Azure VMware Solution datastore performance considerations for Azure NetApp Files ...p-files/performance-azure-vmware-solution-datastore.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. Windows tools and concepts (NTFS, volume shadow copies, Storage Spaces) are mentioned alongside Linux equivalents, but Windows examples and references (e.g., 'Creating striped volumes in Windows Server') appear before or more prominently than Linux ones. There are references to Linux (Ubuntu, XFS, LVM, fio), but practical Linux examples (e.g., commands for disk striping, snapshotting) are missing or less detailed compared to Windows. The 'Next steps' section lists Windows-specific guidance before Linux, and Linux disk striping is referenced only via a generic Azure page, not a direct Linux how-to.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux command-line examples for disk striping (e.g., using LVM or mdadm) and snapshotting (e.g., xfs_freeze, lvcreate --snapshot) in the recommendations and next steps sections.
  • Ensure Linux best practices (such as NFS mount options, file system tuning) are presented with equal prominence and detail as Windows equivalents.
  • Reorder the 'Next steps' section to present Linux and Windows guidance in parallel or alternate order, rather than listing Windows first.
  • Include links to Linux-specific documentation (e.g., 'Creating striped volumes in Linux', 'Linux backup and snapshot strategies') alongside Windows links.
  • Provide example monitoring commands or tools for Linux (e.g., iostat, nfsstat, atop) in addition to vCenter and Azure Console/API references.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand Server Message Block support in Azure NetApp Files ...cles/azure-netapp-files/sever-message-block-support.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows terminology, tools, and examples throughout. Features and behaviors are described primarily in terms of Windows technologies (Active Directory, NTFS, Hyper-V, MS SQL Server, VSS, etc.), with little to no mention of Linux or macOS client configuration or usage. Windows-specific features and limitations are listed first and in detail, while Linux equivalents (such as UNIX extensions, POSIX permissions, or Samba client configuration) are either omitted or briefly mentioned as unsupported. There are no Linux or cross-platform usage examples, and references to configuration or troubleshooting are almost exclusively Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit examples and guidance for connecting to Azure NetApp Files SMB shares from Linux and macOS clients (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or Finder).
  • Include configuration details for Linux-based SMB clients, such as Kerberos setup, mounting options, and troubleshooting common issues.
  • Discuss SMB features and limitations from a Linux/macOS perspective, including how unsupported features (like UNIX extensions) affect Linux clients.
  • Balance references to Windows tools (e.g., PowerShell, NTFS, Hyper-V) with Linux equivalents (e.g., Samba, ext4, KVM/QEMU) where applicable.
  • Provide parity in examples and troubleshooting steps for both Windows and Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files How Azure NetApp Files snapshots work .../articles/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-introduction.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: Windows tooling (PowerShell) is mentioned explicitly and linked before Linux equivalents; PowerShell is referenced in both manual and automated snapshot creation sections, while Linux-specific tools (such as Bash scripts or Linux CLI usage) are not mentioned or exemplified. The scripting example provided is for SQL Server (a Windows-centric workload) and does not reference Linux alternatives. There are no explicit Linux or Unix shell examples, nor is there mention of Linux-specific patterns for managing snapshots, despite Azure NetApp Files supporting NFS volumes (commonly used on Linux).
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux/Unix shell (bash) examples for snapshot management using Azure CLI.
  • Include references to Linux tools and patterns (e.g., cron jobs for automation, shell scripts) alongside PowerShell.
  • Mention and link to Linux documentation for Azure CLI and REST API usage.
  • Provide parity in scripting examples, such as managing snapshots for Linux-based workloads (e.g., Oracle, SAP HANA on Linux).
  • Ensure that both Windows and Linux approaches are presented together, or alternate which is presented first.
  • Clarify that Azure NetApp Files supports both SMB (Windows) and NFS (Linux/Unix) volumes, and provide examples for both.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Azure NetApp Files tools ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/tools-reference.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page lists several tools for Azure NetApp Files, but includes a PowerShell-specific tool (ANFHealthCheck) without mentioning Linux or cross-platform alternatives. There is a notable absence of Linux shell or CLI examples, and the only automation example is Windows-centric. Other tools are web-based or generic, but the only code/runbook example is Windows/PowerShell-focused.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux/bash examples or tools for monitoring and reporting, such as a Bash or Python script alternative to ANFHealthCheck.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility for automation tools and clarify if they can be run on Linux (e.g., via Azure CLI, Python, or REST API).
  • Add documentation or links for Linux-native monitoring and alerting solutions (such as using Azure CLI or integrating with Linux-based automation).
  • Ensure future tool listings include both Windows and Linux usage patterns, or state platform requirements up front.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Troubleshoot volume errors for Azure NetApp Files ...in/articles/azure-netapp-files/troubleshoot-volumes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Troubleshooting guidance and error resolutions for SMB and dual-protocol volumes are heavily oriented around Active Directory (AD), Microsoft Entra Domain Services, and Windows-centric concepts. Windows terminology (e.g., 'Administrator group', 'OU', 'Kerberos', 'LDAP Signing') is used throughout, and PowerShell commands are provided for Kerberos configuration. Linux-specific troubleshooting steps, tools, and examples are less prominent, and when present (e.g., NFSv4.1 Kerberos troubleshooting), they appear later in the document. There are no Linux command-line examples for common diagnostics (such as using dig, host, or systemctl for DNS/LDAP issues), and Windows/AD patterns are assumed as the default.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and examples alongside Windows/AD guidance, especially for DNS, LDAP, and Kerberos errors.
  • Provide Linux command-line examples (e.g., using dig, host, nslookup, systemctl) for verifying DNS, LDAP, and Kerberos configurations.
  • Include parity in privilege and group membership explanations for Linux environments (e.g., mapping POSIX groups, using sssd or winbind).
  • When mentioning PowerShell commands, also provide equivalent Linux commands or configuration steps (e.g., using samba-tool, kadmin, or editing krb5.conf).
  • Clarify when troubleshooting steps are specific to Windows/AD environments and offer alternatives for Linux-only deployments.
  • Ensure that NFS and Linux-centric troubleshooting is given equal prominence and not relegated to later sections.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand guidelines for Active Directory Domain Services site design and planning ...rstand-guidelines-active-directory-domain-service-site.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-based AD DS scenarios, referencing Windows tools (Active Directory Sites and Services utility), and omitting Linux-specific guidance or examples for AD DS site design and management. While Linux clients are mentioned for Kerberos authentication, all configuration and management instructions, screenshots, and tool references are exclusively Windows-centric. No Linux equivalents or cross-platform alternatives are provided for AD DS site topology configuration, verification, or troubleshooting.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-based examples for AD DS site discovery, configuration, and verification (e.g., using Samba, realmd, or sssd).
  • Reference cross-platform tools or CLI utilities (such as samba-tool, ldapsearch, or Kerberos utilities) for managing and verifying AD DS site topology.
  • Provide screenshots or command-line walkthroughs for Linux environments alongside Windows GUI instructions.
  • Clarify which steps are relevant for Linux-based AD DS deployments or clients, and offer guidance for mixed OS environments.
  • Add troubleshooting steps and diagnostic commands for Linux clients connecting to AD DS (e.g., checking Kerberos tickets, LDAP queries, DNS SRV record resolution).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand data encryption in Azure NetApp Files ...icles/azure-netapp-files/understand-data-encryption.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows/SMB encryption topics, referencing Windows-specific tools and features (such as UNC hardening, Group Policy, and Active Directory), and providing configuration guidance primarily for Windows environments. Linux/NFS encryption is covered, but with less detail and without practical configuration examples. There is a lack of parity in examples and guidance for Linux clients and tools, especially regarding LDAP and Kerberos integration.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific configuration examples for NFS Kerberos encryption, such as how to configure krb5p on popular Linux distributions.
  • Include guidance for LDAP signing and channel binding from Linux/UNIX client perspectives, not just Windows/Active Directory.
  • Provide parity in troubleshooting and best practices for both Windows and Linux environments, especially for SMB and NFS encryption.
  • Reference and link to Linux tools (e.g., sssd, nfs-utils, OpenLDAP) and their configuration steps where relevant.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux/NFS topics are given equal prominence to Windows/SMB topics.
  • Where screenshots or examples are given for packet captures, include both Windows and Linux client scenarios.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Understand path lengths in Azure NetApp Files ...articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-path-lengths.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows/SMB path length details, registry and Group Policy configuration, and Windows-specific error dialogs and workarounds. Windows tools and patterns (e.g., registry edits, drive letter mapping, UNC paths) are described in detail before Linux/NFS equivalents. Linux/NFS examples are present but less emphasized, and Linux-specific troubleshooting or configuration guidance is minimal compared to Windows.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux/NFS troubleshooting steps and error screenshots (e.g., show Linux error dialogs or CLI outputs for path length issues).
  • Include Linux-specific configuration options for extending or querying path limits (e.g., mention relevant sysctl or mount options, or reference NFS client documentation).
  • Balance example depth: Expand Linux/NFS sections to match the detail given to Windows/SMB, including practical scenarios and solutions.
  • Add Linux-centric workarounds for path length limitations, such as using bind mounts or alternative mount points.
  • Reference Linux documentation and tools (e.g., mention 'getconf', 'limits.h', or other utilities) earlier and more prominently, not just as a footnote.
  • Where Windows registry or Group Policy changes are described, provide parallel guidance for Linux system configuration if applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files Use DFS-N and DFS Root Consolidation with Azure NetApp Files ...s-n-and-dfs-root-consolidation-with-azure-netapp-files.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is heavily Windows-centric, focusing exclusively on Windows Server, Windows AD, Windows DNS, and PowerShell for all examples and procedures. There are no Linux or cross-platform alternatives provided, and all tooling and patterns assume a Windows environment. Even the conceptual explanations and requirements are framed around Windows technologies, with no mention of Linux-based SMB servers, Samba, or non-Windows DNS management.
Recommendations
  • Add a section explaining DFS-N concepts for administrators using Samba (Linux) as an SMB server, including any relevant compatibility notes.
  • Provide examples for managing SMB shares and DFS-like namespace virtualization using Samba on Linux, if supported.
  • Include DNS management instructions for common Linux DNS servers (e.g., BIND), not just Windows DNS.
  • Clarify whether DFS-N can be used with non-Windows SMB servers and, if so, provide configuration steps for those platforms.
  • If PowerShell is not available on Linux, suggest equivalent CLI or configuration steps using Linux tools.
  • Explicitly state platform limitations and alternatives for Linux users, or link to relevant cross-platform documentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/cross-region-replication-create-peering.md ...etapp-files/cross-region-replication-create-peering.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing Azure PowerShell commands as the primary method for feature registration and status checking, with Azure CLI (cross-platform) only mentioned briefly and secondarily. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples or guidance, and the command-line instructions default to PowerShell syntax, which is most familiar to Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Present Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell commands, ideally before or at least equally with PowerShell, since CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed on Linux/macOS using Azure CLI, and provide links or guidance for installing and using Azure CLI on those platforms.
  • Include screenshots or instructions that show the process in a Linux environment (e.g., terminal usage), not just the Azure portal.
  • Where possible, avoid assuming PowerShell as the default shell for command-line instructions; offer bash/zsh syntax for CLI commands.
  • Add a note clarifying that Azure NetApp Files management is fully supported from Linux and macOS systems using Azure CLI.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/enable-continuous-availability-existing-SMB.md ...p-files/enable-continuous-availability-existing-SMB.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All verification steps use PowerShell commands, and instructions explicitly reference rebooting Windows systems. There are no examples or guidance for Linux or macOS clients, nor are equivalent Linux tools or commands mentioned. The documentation assumes a Windows-centric environment for both management and client access.
Recommendations
  • Add verification steps for Linux and macOS clients, such as using smbclient or mount.cifs to check SMB session properties.
  • Clarify whether rebooting is required for non-Windows clients and provide guidance for those platforms.
  • Include examples of how to verify SMB Continuous Availability from Linux systems, possibly referencing relevant logs or commands.
  • Mention any differences or limitations in SMB CA support for non-Windows clients.
  • Reorder instructions to address both Windows and non-Windows environments, or provide parallel sections for each.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions.md ...zure-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by describing Windows SMB inheritance controls first, including a screenshot of the Windows interface, while Linux/NFS inheritance is described only textually and without visual aids or command-line examples. Windows terminology and tools (e.g., 'advanced permission view') are mentioned explicitly, whereas Linux/NFS equivalents (such as chmod, setfacl, or command-line usage) are not demonstrated. No Linux shell or NFSv4.1 ACL examples are provided.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux/NFS command-line examples (e.g., setfacl, getfacl, chmod, chown) for managing file permissions and inheritance.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output demonstrating how to view and modify NFS permissions and inheritance on Linux.
  • Present NFS/Linux procedures before or alongside Windows/SMB procedures to ensure parity.
  • Expand explanations of NFSv3 and NFSv4.1 inheritance mechanisms with practical examples.
  • Reference Linux tools and patterns explicitly, not just Windows GUI features.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/object-rest-api-browser.md ...articles/azure-netapp-files/object-rest-api-browser.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows-first bias, particularly in the certificate installation section, which exclusively describes the process using Windows GUI tools and terminology. S3 Browser, a Windows-only tool, is the only GUI client example provided. While the AWS CLI section includes both Windows and Linux installation instructions, the overall guidance and screenshots are Windows-centric, and there are no Linux-specific instructions for certificate installation or alternative Linux GUI clients.
Recommendations
  • Add a section detailing how to install the certificate in trusted roots on Linux systems (e.g., using update-ca-certificates or trust anchors on common distributions).
  • Include examples of S3-compatible GUI clients available on Linux (such as Cyberduck or s3cmd) and provide usage instructions.
  • When listing steps or tools, present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel, or at least give equal prominence to both platforms.
  • Avoid assuming the use of Windows-only tools (like S3 Browser) as the default; offer cross-platform alternatives.
  • Where possible, provide command-line alternatives for certificate installation and management, which are applicable across platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/tools-reference.md ...ob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/tools-reference.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page lists multiple tools for Azure NetApp Files, but only one tool (ANFHealthCheck) is specifically described as a PowerShell runbook, with no mention of Linux/bash alternatives or cross-platform compatibility. There is a lack of Linux-specific examples or equivalent tooling, and Windows-centric tools (PowerShell, Azure Logic Apps) are mentioned without parity for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/bash equivalents or cross-platform scripts for tools like ANFHealthCheck, or clarify if they can run on Linux via PowerShell Core.
  • Include examples or references for using these tools in Linux environments, such as bash scripts, Python, or CLI alternatives.
  • Explicitly state platform compatibility for each tool, indicating whether they support Windows, Linux, or both.
  • Where Azure Logic Apps or PowerShell are mentioned, suggest or provide alternatives that work natively on Linux (e.g., Azure CLI, REST API calls, or containerized solutions).
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 8 of 36 Next →