114
Total Pages
55
Linux-Friendly Pages
59
Pages with Bias
51.8%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues (89)

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page generally maintains cross-platform language and includes a Linux-based pool template example. However, in the section on file transfer, all CLI examples use Windows-style paths (e.g., c:\source_videos\*.mp4), with no Linux/macOS equivalents provided. This implicitly prioritizes Windows users and may confuse or exclude Linux/macOS users.
Recommendations:
  • For every CLI example using a Windows file path, provide a Linux/macOS equivalent (e.g., /home/user/source_videos/*.mp4).
  • When referencing file paths, use platform-neutral language or clarify that the syntax differs by OS.
  • Consider alternating the order of examples or presenting both Windows and Linux/macOS commands side by side.
  • Explicitly state that the Azure CLI and Batch CLI extension are cross-platform and provide links to OS-specific installation instructions if needed.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exclusively demonstrates authentication using the .NET library and the C# AccountManagement sample, both of which are Windows-centric. There are no Linux or cross-platform code examples, nor is there mention of Linux-specific tools or workflows. The Azure portal instructions and terminology (e.g., 'Windows Azure Service Management API') further reinforce a Windows-first perspective.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent code samples in cross-platform languages (e.g., Python, Java) using their respective Azure SDKs.
  • Include instructions or references for registering and authenticating applications using CLI tools available on Linux, such as Azure CLI or PowerShell Core (cross-platform).
  • Mention and demonstrate how to run the sample or equivalent workflows on Linux or macOS environments.
  • Avoid using 'Windows' in API names or instructions unless strictly necessary, and clarify when something is cross-platform.
  • Add a section or links for Linux users, covering authentication and application registration steps relevant to their environment.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively providing .NET (C#) code samples, referencing Visual Studio as the development environment, and mentioning Windows-specific tools and workflows. There are no Linux or cross-platform examples, nor are alternative development environments or command-line workflows discussed. The documentation assumes the use of Windows-centric tools and patterns throughout.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent code samples using cross-platform .NET Core/.NET 6+ that can be run on Linux and macOS, not just Windows.
  • Include instructions for setting up and running the sample using cross-platform editors like VS Code or JetBrains Rider, and command-line tools (e.g., dotnet CLI) instead of only Visual Studio.
  • Add explicit guidance for running Azure Batch tasks on Linux pools, including any differences in environment variables, file paths, or runtime considerations.
  • Reference and link to Linux/macOS compatible Azure Storage client libraries and usage patterns.
  • Clarify that the File Conventions library and Azure Batch support both Windows and Linux compute nodes, and provide examples or notes for both.
  • If possible, provide a sample project or walkthrough that demonstrates persisting output from a Linux-based Batch task (e.g., using .NET on Ubuntu).

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Heavy
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows-first bias by referencing Windows OS families and configurations in detail, providing explicit mapping to Windows Server versions, and including a dedicated section for Windows-specific configuration (windowsConfiguration). Linux-specific configuration is only mentioned indirectly (e.g., by exclusion), and there is no equivalent Linux configuration section or detailed mapping for Linux OS images. Additionally, the deprecated 'cloudServiceConfiguration' is exclusively Windows-based.
Recommendations:
  • Add a 'linuxConfiguration' section parallel to 'windowsConfiguration', describing available Linux-specific settings for virtual machines.
  • Include explicit examples and documentation for Linux OS images, such as common publishers/offers/SKUs for popular Linux distributions.
  • Where OS families or versions are discussed, provide equivalent Linux information (e.g., mapping of common Linux image references, links to Linux release notes).
  • When referencing documentation for VM sizes, ensure Linux and Windows links are presented together or Linux-first, not Windows-first.
  • Clarify in notes and tables when a property is Windows-only, and provide Linux alternatives or state explicitly when Linux does not require a setting.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page describes how to rotate Batch account shared keys, but only provides instructions for using the Azure portal and does not include any command-line examples. There is no mention of platform-specific tools, but the absence of CLI (such as Azure CLI or PowerShell) examples means there is no parity for users who may prefer or require Linux-based workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples for key rotation, as the Azure CLI is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux.
  • If PowerShell examples are added, ensure they are accompanied by equivalent Azure CLI commands.
  • Explicitly mention that the procedure can be performed from any OS using the Azure CLI, and provide sample commands.
  • Consider including REST API examples for advanced users or automation scenarios, which are also platform-agnostic.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page generally avoids platform-specific instructions or examples, but the only explicit OS-specific mention is for Windows pools in the 'Node OS updates' section. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or parity notes. No shell or PowerShell commands are shown, but the only OS-specific configuration (automatic updates) is described for Windows, with no mention of Linux equivalents or differences.
Recommendations:
  • Add a section or note describing how OS updates are handled for Linux pools, including default behaviors and configuration options.
  • Wherever Windows-specific behaviors or properties are mentioned (such as 'enableAutomaticUpdates'), include equivalent information for Linux pools, or explicitly state if not applicable.
  • If there are differences in troubleshooting steps, log file locations, or node management between Windows and Linux pools, provide parallel guidance or examples.
  • Consider including at least one example error or scenario that is specific to Linux pools to demonstrate parity and awareness of cross-platform usage.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First
Summary:
The documentation alternates between Windows (RDP) and Linux (SSH) examples, but consistently presents Windows/RDP examples before Linux/SSH examples in each section. Both platforms are covered with equivalent code samples and explanations, and there are no missing Linux examples or exclusive references to Windows tools or PowerShell. However, the ordering may subtly prioritize Windows scenarios.
Recommendations:
  • Alternate the order of examples in each section, sometimes presenting Linux/SSH first.
  • Add a short statement at the beginning clarifying that both Windows and Linux pools are equally supported, and that examples are provided for both.
  • Ensure parity in the depth and detail of examples for both platforms.
  • Consider grouping examples by scenario (e.g., 'Allow remote access', 'Deny remote access') and presenting both Windows and Linux code side by side for each scenario.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All code examples use Windows command-line syntax (cmd.exe /c echo ...), with no mention of Linux or cross-platform shell equivalents. The documentation exclusively references Windows tools (cmd.exe), and does not provide any Linux/bash examples or guidance for non-Windows users. There is no mention of how to adapt the task commands or environment for Linux pools, which are common in Azure Batch scenarios.
Recommendations:
  • For every example using Windows command-line syntax (e.g., cmd.exe /c echo ...), provide an equivalent Linux/bash example (e.g., /bin/bash -c 'echo ...').
  • Explicitly mention that Azure Batch supports both Windows and Linux pools, and clarify any differences in task command lines between platforms.
  • When referencing tools or shell environments (such as cmd.exe), provide Linux alternatives (such as /bin/bash) and explain how to select the appropriate shell for the pool OS.
  • Add a section or note about cross-platform considerations, including how to write portable task commands and how to detect the OS of the compute node.
  • Ensure that links to sample code or repositories include Linux examples or instructions for adapting to Linux environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation presents PowerShell examples before Azure CLI examples, which may suggest a Windows-first perspective. The PowerShell section is detailed and appears before the cross-platform Azure CLI section, potentially prioritizing Windows users. However, both PowerShell and CLI examples are provided, and the CLI examples use POSIX shell syntax, supporting Linux/macOS users.
Recommendations:
  • Present Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell examples to avoid implying Windows is the primary platform.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands are cross-platform and suitable for Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Consider adding a short note or table at the top summarizing tool parity and platform support.
  • Ensure that any screenshots or UI references are not Windows-specific (the current portal section is neutral).

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. PowerShell cmdlets are listed as the first command-line tool, and the use of Remote Desktop (RDP) for accessing compute nodes is mentioned without reference to SSH or Linux alternatives. While the Azure CLI is described as cross-platform and Batch Explorer is available for all OSes, the prominence of PowerShell and RDP, both Windows-centric tools, suggests a preference for Windows workflows. There are no explicit Linux shell or Bash examples, and Linux-native troubleshooting or access patterns are not highlighted.
Recommendations:
  • List Azure CLI before PowerShell in the command-line tools section to emphasize cross-platform parity.
  • Mention SSH as an alternative to RDP for accessing compute nodes, especially for Linux-based pools.
  • Include examples or references to Linux shell (Bash) usage where appropriate, such as troubleshooting or file access.
  • Ensure that all tooling and workflow descriptions explicitly note Linux compatibility or provide Linux-specific guidance where workflows differ.
  • Consider adding a note or section on best practices for Linux-based Batch pools, including access, debugging, and environment setup.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily in the 'Configure user subscription mode' section, where only PowerShell cmdlets (Get-AzMarketplaceTerms, Set-AzMarketplaceTerms) are provided for accepting legal terms, with no equivalent Azure CLI or REST API examples. The rest of the page is Azure portal-focused and generally platform-neutral, but the only explicit command-line instructions are Windows/PowerShell-centric. Alternative tools like Azure CLI are only mentioned in a list at the end, not in the main workflow or examples.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI commands for all PowerShell examples, especially for accepting Marketplace legal terms (e.g., using 'az vm image terms accept').
  • When referencing command-line tools, mention both PowerShell and Azure CLI options together, or present Azure CLI first to avoid implicit Windows prioritization.
  • Include explicit Linux/macOS-compatible instructions and screenshots where relevant, or clarify that all steps are cross-platform unless otherwise noted.
  • Where possible, link to REST API documentation for users who may prefer scripting outside of PowerShell or CLI.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides both Linux and Windows configuration tables and some parity in example sections. However, there is a noticeable Windows bias: Windows examples (especially for installing drivers and MPI) are more detailed, appear first in example sections, and reference Windows-specific tools (e.g., PowerShell, Remote Desktop, Microsoft MPI) without always providing equivalent Linux command-line or tool examples. The Linux example for GPU drivers is less detailed and lacks explicit command-line instructions, while the Windows example includes a full start task command. There is also a reliance on Windows-centric patterns (e.g., RDP, PowerShell), and the documentation sometimes references Windows tools before Linux equivalents.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux examples with the same level of detail as Windows, including explicit shell command lines for installing drivers and configuring pools.
  • When listing options or examples, alternate the order or present Linux and Windows in parallel to avoid 'windows_first' bias.
  • Include Linux-native tools and workflows (e.g., SSH, Bash scripts) in examples, not just Windows tools like PowerShell or RDP.
  • For each Windows-specific instruction (e.g., PowerShell commands, RDP), provide the Linux equivalent (e.g., Bash/CLI commands, SSH).
  • Ensure that all example tables (such as start task commands) include both Linux and Windows variants.
  • Link to up-to-date Linux documentation and avoid referencing EOL Linux versions.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting .NET (C#) and Windows-specific examples and references before Linux or cross-platform alternatives. The .NET example uses a Windows Server image, and PowerShell cmdlets are mentioned as a primary tool. While a Python example with Ubuntu is included, it appears after the Windows/.NET example. There are no explicit Linux shell or CLI examples, and the documentation does not provide parity in tool coverage or ordering.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux/Bash CLI examples alongside or before Windows/PowerShell/.NET examples.
  • Include explicit instructions and code samples for creating and managing autoscale pools using Azure CLI and Bash scripts, not just PowerShell or .NET.
  • When referencing VM images, alternate or equally present Ubuntu/Linux and Windows images in code samples.
  • Mention cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI) before or alongside platform-specific tools (e.g., PowerShell).
  • Ensure that all SDK and API references (Python, Java, CLI) are given equal prominence and ordering as .NET/Windows.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux users, highlighting any differences or considerations.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a mild Windows bias. Windows tools and patterns (e.g., cmd.exe, drive letters, backslashes in paths) are often mentioned first or exclusively. Some examples and directory postfixes use Windows conventions (e.g., backslashes), and Linux equivalents are sometimes less detailed or presented second. There is also a lack of parity in some explanations, such as the use of drive letters for Windows mounts and the absence of explicit Linux mount path examples.
Recommendations:
  • Present Linux and Windows examples in parallel, with equal detail and prominence.
  • Avoid using Windows path conventions (e.g., backslashes, drive letters) as the default; provide both Windows and Linux path formats in tables and examples.
  • When referencing tools (e.g., cmd.exe), always include the Linux equivalent (e.g., /bin/sh) with equal detail.
  • For environment variables or features that differ by OS (e.g., AZ_BATCH_APP_PACKAGE naming), provide clear, side-by-side examples for both platforms.
  • Where possible, use OS-agnostic language or clarify when something is OS-specific.
  • Ensure that all instructions, especially those involving directory structures or shell commands, have Linux equivalents and are not Windows-centric.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: Windows tools and patterns (such as cmdkey, net use, and Windows-style azcopy syntax) are presented in detail, with explicit examples and command lines. In contrast, Linux equivalents (such as mounting Azure Files with SMB or using azcopy with Linux syntax) are either missing or only briefly mentioned without examples. The order of presentation often places Windows solutions and tools before Linux ones, and there is a lack of parity in the depth of guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux-specific command-line examples for azcopy, including syntax and parameters as used in bash.
  • Include explicit instructions and sample commands for mounting Azure Files shares on Linux VMs (e.g., using mount.cifs or SMB tools).
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows solutions are introduced together or alternate, rather than consistently leading with Windows.
  • Where Windows tools or patterns (e.g., cmdkey, net use) are described, provide the direct Linux equivalents (e.g., mount commands, credential handling) with equal detail.
  • Ensure that all tools mentioned (such as Azure CLI, azcopy, Storage Explorer) are described with usage notes for both platforms, and clarify any platform-specific limitations or differences.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page describes the Azure Batch workflow and resources in a platform-neutral way, but there are subtle signs of Windows bias. The workflow and examples do not mention Linux-specific considerations, tools, or patterns, and the 'Next steps' section highlights the .NET client library (commonly associated with Windows) before Python. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform examples, nor are Linux-specific tools or shell scripting mentioned.
Recommendations:
  • Include explicit references to both Windows and Linux when discussing compute node OS selection, with examples for each.
  • Provide sample workflows or links to quickstarts for both Windows (PowerShell, .NET) and Linux (Bash, Python, etc.) environments.
  • Mention Linux-friendly tools and scripting options (e.g., Bash scripts) alongside Windows tools.
  • Ensure parity in the order of presenting SDKs and tools (e.g., list Python and .NET together or alternate their order).
  • Add a note or section highlighting cross-platform support and any OS-specific considerations for Batch tasks.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows terminology and examples. In the VM preparation section, RDP (Windows) is mentioned before SSH (Linux), and the only code sample for pool creation uses a Windows node agent SKU ('batch.node.windows amd64') with no Linux equivalent shown. There are no explicit Linux command-line or configuration examples, and the .NET SDK example is Windows-centric. While Linux is mentioned in passing, practical Linux guidance and parity in examples are lacking.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux examples wherever Windows-specific instructions or code samples are given (e.g., show both 'batch.node.windows amd64' and a Linux node agent SKU in code).
  • Instruct on connecting to VMs using SSH (Linux) before or alongside RDP (Windows), or present both equally.
  • Include Linux command-line examples (e.g., az CLI, Bash) for creating snapshots, images, and pools, not just general references.
  • Ensure all code samples and configuration snippets demonstrate both Windows and Linux scenarios, including REST and SDK usage.
  • Balance references to Windows and Linux documentation links, and avoid defaulting to Windows-first language or ordering.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation shows a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell as the only example for programmatically checking VM series support for ephemeral OS disks, without mentioning or providing equivalent Linux/CLI commands. The mention of PowerShell occurs before any cross-platform alternatives, and there are no Linux shell or Azure CLI examples for this task. While the code examples for SDK usage are cross-platform (Python and C#), the operational guidance and tooling references are Windows-centric.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI and/or Bash examples for checking VM series support for ephemeral OS disks, alongside or before PowerShell examples.
  • Explicitly mention that PowerShell is available cross-platform, or clarify if the example is Windows-only.
  • Ensure that operational instructions reference both Windows and Linux tools where applicable.
  • Add a note or section for Linux users, highlighting how to perform the same checks and configurations using Linux-native tools.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively guiding users to create a pool of Windows compute nodes, specifying Windows Server 2019 as the OS, and providing only Windows command-line examples (using 'cmd', 'set', and 'timeout'). There is no mention of Linux node options, nor are there equivalent Linux shell command examples. The documentation does not mention or demonstrate how to use Linux-based pools or tasks, nor does it provide parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions for creating a pool of Linux compute nodes, specifying a common Linux distribution (e.g., Ubuntu).
  • Provide Linux shell command equivalents for the task command line (e.g., using 'bash', 'env', and 'sleep').
  • Present both Windows and Linux options side by side or clearly indicate how to adapt the steps for Linux environments.
  • Mention that Azure Batch supports both Windows and Linux pools, and link to documentation for both.
  • Ensure screenshots and UI steps clarify where OS selection can be changed, and what options are available.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation consistently lists PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) as the first example for querying supported VM sizes and images, and refers to PowerShell-specific cmdlets throughout. While Azure CLI (cross-platform) and REST API options are also provided, there are no Linux shell or scripting examples, and the ordering and emphasis suggest a Windows-first perspective. There is no mention of Linux-native tools or patterns for interacting with Azure Batch, nor any Linux-specific considerations or examples.
Recommendations:
  • Alternate the order of examples so that Azure CLI (which is cross-platform and popular on Linux) appears before PowerShell, or present both together without prioritizing one.
  • Include Linux shell (bash) scripting examples for querying and processing Azure Batch information, such as using jq to parse JSON output from Azure CLI.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide example shell prompts (e.g., $ for bash) to reinforce cross-platform usage.
  • If relevant, add Linux-specific considerations or tips (e.g., environment variable handling, file system paths) when discussing VM images or node configuration.
  • Avoid referring to PowerShell as the primary or default tool, and instead present it as one of several options.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively using Windows-based Batch pools and Windows application packages (specifically the Windows 64-bit version of FFmpeg). ARM templates are configured for Windows nodes only, and there are no Linux pool or application examples. The build and deployment steps focus on Windows artifacts, and the agent specification is set to 'windows-latest' without mention of Linux alternatives. While there is a brief note that Azure Pipelines and Batch support Linux, no Linux-specific instructions, templates, or examples are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel examples for Linux-based Batch pools, including ARM templates with Linux VM images and nodeAgentSkuId for Linux.
  • Include instructions for downloading and packaging the Linux version of FFmpeg, and show how to deploy it to Linux nodes.
  • Demonstrate how to set the agent specification to 'ubuntu-latest' or another Linux agent in Azure Pipelines.
  • Add Linux-specific YAML build and deployment steps, highlighting any differences in file packaging or deployment.
  • Wherever Windows-specific tools or patterns are mentioned (such as PowerShell Core), offer equivalent Bash or Linux shell alternatives.
  • Ensure screenshots and code snippets reflect both Windows and Linux scenarios where applicable.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing a command-line example only for Windows nodes (using .exe files), omitting equivalent Linux/bash examples. The only explicit example of invoking a custom script is for Windows, and there is no mention of Linux shell scripts or Linux-specific patterns. Additionally, the documentation refers to .NET and C# libraries first, with no parity for other languages or platforms, and does not mention Linux tools or patterns.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Linux/bash examples alongside Windows examples, e.g., show how to call a shell script (e.g., './doMyWork.sh && ./uploadMyFilesToSql.sh') after the Windows .exe example.
  • Mention both Windows and Linux nodes explicitly when discussing custom file movement solutions, and provide guidance for both environments.
  • Include references to cross-platform tools and patterns, not just .NET/C# libraries, and highlight any SDKs or libraries available for other languages.
  • Where possible, present examples in a platform-neutral way, or always provide both Windows and Linux variants.
  • Clarify that Azure Batch supports both Windows and Linux nodes, and link to relevant documentation for each.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. While it is mostly platform-agnostic in its main guidance, several sections either mention Windows tools or patterns first, provide more detail for Windows, or lack parity in Linux-specific examples. For example, remote access ports are listed as '3389 (Windows), 22 (Linux)', with Windows mentioned first. There are references to PowerShell and RDP (Windows Remote Desktop) without equivalent Linux command-line or SSH examples. The prerequisites mention Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI, and there are no explicit Linux command-line or shell examples for creating or managing resources. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tooling and patterns, and Linux users may find the guidance less tailored to their workflows.
Recommendations:
  • When listing remote access ports, alternate the order or mention Linux (SSH/22) first in some places to balance visibility.
  • Provide explicit Linux command-line (bash/CLI) examples alongside or before PowerShell examples, especially in prerequisites and resource creation steps.
  • Mention Azure CLI as prominently as Azure PowerShell in all relevant sections, and provide equivalent instructions for both.
  • Reference SSH and Linux-native tools (e.g., scp, sftp) alongside RDP and Windows tools when discussing remote access.
  • Where screenshots or UI elements are shown, clarify that the instructions are platform-neutral or provide notes for Linux users if there are differences.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux users, highlighting any special considerations or best practices for Linux-based Batch pools.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by providing only a Windows-based VM image example (MicrosoftWindowsServer) and node agent SKU (batch.node.windows amd64) in the code sample, with no equivalent Linux example or mention. The example uses Windows-specific values and does not demonstrate how to update a pool to use a Linux image or node agent. There is no discussion of Linux VM images, node agent SKUs, or Linux-specific considerations, and the only concrete example is for Windows. This may lead Linux users to feel unsupported or unclear about the process for Linux pools.
Recommendations:
  • Add a parallel example demonstrating how to update a pool to use a Linux VM image and the appropriate Linux node agent SKU.
  • Explicitly mention both Windows and Linux options in all relevant sections, including lists of supported publishers, offers, and SKUs.
  • In code samples, provide both Windows and Linux variants, or use a generic template with comments explaining how to substitute for either OS.
  • Include a table or section listing common Windows and Linux VM image references and node agent SKUs for Batch pools.
  • Review all examples and ensure Linux is given equal prominence and clarity as Windows.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a mild Windows bias. Windows tools and patterns (e.g., PowerShell, RDP) are often mentioned first or exclusively, and some examples or instructions are more detailed for Windows than Linux. While Linux is referenced, parity in examples and tool coverage is lacking in some sections.
Recommendations:
  • When listing supported images or tools, present Azure CLI (cross-platform) examples before or alongside PowerShell, and ensure both Windows and Linux are equally represented.
  • Provide explicit Linux command-line examples (e.g., SSH connection commands, Linux-specific disk mounting instructions) where only Windows (RDP) or PowerShell examples are given.
  • In portal instructions, detail both RDP (Windows) and SSH (Linux) connection steps, including example commands for SSH.
  • Ensure that all code snippets and tool references (e.g., for checking purchase plan info, mounting disks, etc.) have both Windows and Linux variants, or clarify when a step is OS-agnostic.
  • Where possible, use neutral language (e.g., 'Connect via RDP (Windows) or SSH (Linux)') and avoid always listing Windows first.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation primarily demonstrates deployment using the Azure Portal, and when mentioning alternative methods, it lists Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI and REST API. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples (e.g., Azure CLI or Bash), and the only linked deployment method is to a PowerShell-focused page, which may suggest a Windows-first or Windows-centric approach.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI examples for deploying the ARM template, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • When listing alternative deployment methods, mention Azure CLI before or alongside Azure PowerShell to avoid the impression of Windows-first bias.
  • Include Bash shell or Linux terminal screenshots or instructions where relevant, to demonstrate parity.
  • Link to both PowerShell and CLI deployment documentation, or provide direct step-by-step instructions for both.
  • Explicitly state that all deployment methods are supported on Windows, Linux, and macOS where applicable.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: all code examples are in C# and use Windows-centric command lines (e.g., 'cmd /c'), with no Linux shell equivalents provided. The only detailed example of application execution uses Windows paths and environment variable conventions first, with Linux differences mentioned only as an aside. There are no Linux-specific code snippets or shell command examples, and the documentation consistently references Windows node configuration and tools before Linux. This may hinder Linux users from easily applying the guidance.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux/bash examples for all command-line and code snippets, especially for task command lines and environment variable usage.
  • Include at least one example of deploying and executing an application package on a Linux compute node, using bash syntax and Linux file paths.
  • When describing environment variables and application package paths, present Linux and Windows formats side-by-side, rather than Windows first.
  • Mention Linux node configuration and requirements with equal prominence as Windows, including any differences in application ID rules or file system layout.
  • If possible, include code samples in additional languages (e.g., Python) that are popular in Linux environments, or at least reference their documentation.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Windows-based examples for both REST API and SDK usage. The sample configurations and code exclusively reference Windows images (e.g., MicrosoftWindowsServer, WindowsServer, batch.node.windows amd64) and Windows-specific properties (windowsConfiguration, enableAutomaticUpdates). There are no examples or guidance for provisioning Linux-based pools, nor are Linux image references or configuration options discussed. The documentation also references Windows Update and in-VM patching in a way that is specific to Windows, without mentioning the Linux equivalents.
Recommendations:
  • Add parallel examples for Linux pools, including REST API and SDK (C#) snippets that use Linux image references (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS) and nodeAgentSkuId values appropriate for Linux.
  • Explicitly document Linux-specific configuration options, such as linuxConfiguration blocks, and discuss any differences in automatic OS upgrade behavior between Windows and Linux.
  • Mention Linux update mechanisms (e.g., package manager updates) where Windows Update is discussed, or clarify if/how automatic upgrades differ for Linux nodes.
  • Ensure that references to image publishers, offers, and SKUs include both Windows and Linux options, and provide guidance for selecting Linux images.
  • Where Windows-specific properties are required (e.g., windowsConfiguration), clarify their Linux equivalents or state when they are not applicable.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. In several sections, Windows tools (such as PowerShell) are mentioned before or more prominently than their Linux equivalents. Some examples and guidance are provided only for Windows (e.g., using PowerShell cmdlets to enumerate disks), while Linux examples are less detailed or missing. Additionally, certain recommendations (like using pool scope for short tasks) specifically reference Windows nodes, and Windows-specific issues (directory junctions, Windows Services) are discussed in more detail than their Linux counterparts.
Recommendations:
  • Ensure that for every Windows/PowerShell example or tool mentioned, a Linux/bash equivalent is provided with equal detail and prominence.
  • When listing tools or APIs (e.g., for discovering EOL dates), mention cross-platform options first (such as Azure CLI or REST API), or present both Windows and Linux options together.
  • Expand sections that currently only provide Windows-specific guidance (e.g., disk preparation, directory management) to include equivalent Linux commands and best practices.
  • Balance the discussion of OS-specific pitfalls (e.g., directory junctions in Windows) with Linux-specific considerations (e.g., symlink handling, systemd service management).
  • Where recommendations are OS-specific (such as 'Use pool scope for short tasks on Windows nodes'), clarify if and how they apply to Linux nodes.
  • Review for any missing Linux examples, especially in sections where only PowerShell or Windows tools are referenced, and add bash or Linux-native command examples.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows-first bias in several areas. Windows tools and patterns (such as 'cmd.exe', 'cmd /c', and references to Windows Data Protection API) are used in code examples and scenarios, often without Linux equivalents or with Linux-specific details provided later or omitted. Powershell/Windows command patterns are used in code snippets for .NET, Java, and Python, and Windows terminology is frequently introduced before Linux alternatives. Some Linux-specific configuration is present, but Linux command-line examples are missing, and Windows tools are referenced without Linux alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux shell command examples (e.g., using '/bin/bash -c' instead of 'cmd /c') alongside or before Windows examples in all code snippets.
  • When referencing Windows-specific tools (such as DPAPI), include equivalent Linux approaches (e.g., GnuPG, file permissions, or other secret management solutions).
  • Ensure that all code samples that show Windows VM configuration also show Linux VM configuration, and vice versa, with parity in detail and explanation.
  • Avoid using Windows terminology or tools as the default; instead, present both Windows and Linux options equally, or alternate which is presented first.
  • In the 'Update your code' section, provide Linux-specific migration guidance if any differences exist.
  • Add explicit Linux SSH usage examples for running tasks and managing user accounts, not just configuration.
  • Review all scenarios and ensure Linux is treated as a first-class platform, not an afterthought.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. PowerShell is used as the primary scripting interface for both Windows and Linux examples, rather than showing native Linux shell commands. In several sections, Windows-specific tools and patterns (such as 'cmdkey', 'net use', and RDP) are described in detail, sometimes before their Linux equivalents. Troubleshooting and manual mounting instructions also emphasize Windows tools and workflows, with Linux alternatives provided but less prominently. Native Linux command-line examples (e.g., using 'mount' or 'smbclient') are missing.
Recommendations:
  • Provide native Linux shell (bash) command examples for mounting file systems, in addition to or instead of PowerShell for Linux.
  • When describing mounting and troubleshooting workflows, present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, or lead with Linux examples where appropriate.
  • Include Linux-native troubleshooting steps (e.g., using 'mount', 'dmesg', 'journalctl', or 'lsblk') alongside Windows tools.
  • Reference Linux documentation and tools (such as 'mount.cifs', 'smbclient', or 'systemctl') as prominently as Windows tools.
  • Ensure that all code samples and manual steps are equally detailed for both platforms, and avoid assuming PowerShell is the default interface for Linux users.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page focuses on conceptual information about Azure Batch and Storage accounts, but where it mentions programmatic creation and management, it only references the Azure portal and the Batch Management .NET library—both of which are more commonly associated with Windows environments. There are no examples or mentions of Linux-friendly tools (such as Azure CLI, Bash, or Python SDK), nor are cross-platform command-line options presented. This creates a subtle Windows-first bias and omits Linux parity in tooling guidance.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples and references for creating and managing Batch accounts using the Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Mention and link to documentation for other SDKs (such as Python, Java, or Node.js) that are commonly used in Linux environments.
  • When listing programmatic options, present cross-platform tools (like Azure CLI) before or alongside Windows-centric tools (like .NET library).
  • Add explicit Linux/Bash command-line examples where relevant, especially for common tasks like associating storage accounts.
  • Review and update the 'Next steps' section to include links to cross-platform management options, not just the portal and .NET.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page lacks Linux-specific examples and mentions a Windows command-line pattern before any mention of Linux equivalents. There are no Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, and the only explicit example for running a custom script refers to a Windows node and Windows executables.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Linux/bash examples wherever a Windows command-line or executable is referenced (e.g., show both 'doMyWork.exe && uploadMyFilesToSql.exe' and './doMyWork.sh && ./uploadMyFilesToSql.sh').
  • Explicitly mention that custom file movement solutions can be implemented on both Windows and Linux nodes, and provide guidance for both.
  • Include references or links to cross-platform tools and scripting practices, not just .NET/C# libraries.
  • Ensure that examples and recommendations are presented in a platform-neutral manner, or that both Windows and Linux approaches are given equal prominence.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively describes how to move an Azure Batch account using the Azure portal and ARM templates, with all instructions and UI references tailored to the Azure portal experience. There are no command-line examples (such as Azure CLI, PowerShell, or Bash scripts), and no mention of Linux or cross-platform tooling. The steps and screenshots implicitly assume a Windows-centric workflow, as the Azure portal is often associated with Windows users, and there is no guidance for users who prefer or require command-line or automation approaches common on Linux.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions for moving a Batch account using the Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Include PowerShell examples for Windows users, but ensure CLI/Bash examples are given equal prominence.
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal is accessible from any OS, but provide alternative workflows for users who prefer not to use the portal.
  • Provide downloadable sample scripts (Bash, CLI, PowerShell) for exporting, modifying, and deploying ARM templates.
  • Ensure that any references to tools or workflows are not Windows-specific, or provide Linux/macOS alternatives where relevant.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: it explicitly states that the example deploys Windows software on Windows-based Batch nodes, uses a Windows-specific FFmpeg build, and the ARM template for the Batch pool is hardcoded to use Windows Server images. There are no parallel Linux examples, and the repository setup and pipeline instructions only reference Windows artifacts. Additionally, the agent specification in the pipeline is set to 'windows-latest', and PowerShell Core is used for scripting, with no mention of Bash or Linux agents.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux-based examples throughout the documentation, including ARM templates for Linux Batch pools (e.g., using Ubuntu images) and instructions for deploying Linux software.
  • Include instructions for downloading and packaging a Linux build of FFmpeg, and update the repository structure to accommodate both Windows and Linux application packages.
  • Show how to set up the pipeline using a Linux agent (e.g., 'ubuntu-latest') and provide Bash script alternatives for Azure CLI tasks.
  • Clearly state at the beginning that both Windows and Linux are supported, and offer readers a choice of which path to follow.
  • Where possible, use OS-agnostic language and tools, or provide both Windows and Linux command examples side by side.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation does not provide any command-line examples or tooling instructions for rotating Batch account keys, nor does it mention any platform-specific tools. However, it also does not provide any examples for Linux or cross-platform command-line usage, such as Azure CLI or Bash, which are commonly used on Linux. The only method described is via the Azure portal, which is platform-agnostic, but the absence of CLI or script-based examples may disadvantage Linux users who prefer or require automation.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples for rotating Batch account keys, as the CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Include PowerShell examples only if paired with equivalent Bash or CLI examples.
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal method works on all platforms, but provide automation options for users who do not use a GUI.
  • Consider adding a section on scripting key rotation for CI/CD pipelines, with both Linux (Bash/CLI) and Windows (PowerShell) examples.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows by providing only PowerShell commands (Get-AzMarketplaceTerms, Set-AzMarketplaceTerms) for accepting legal terms, without offering equivalent Azure CLI or Bash examples. The 'Other Batch account management options' section lists PowerShell cmdlets before Azure CLI, and no Linux shell or cross-platform command-line examples are given for key configuration steps. This may hinder Linux users or those preferring cross-platform tools.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI commands for all PowerShell examples, especially for accepting legal terms and managing Batch accounts.
  • When listing management tools, mention Azure CLI before or alongside PowerShell cmdlets to avoid implying a Windows-first approach.
  • Include Bash or shell script examples where appropriate, or clarify that steps can be performed from any OS using the Azure CLI.
  • Explicitly state that all portal-based steps are OS-agnostic, and provide links to cross-platform documentation where available.
  • Consider adding a table or section summarizing command-line options for both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux/macOS (Azure CLI/Bash).

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. PowerShell cmdlets are listed first among command-line tools, and the use of Remote Desktop (RDP) for node access is highlighted without mentioning SSH as a Linux equivalent. While the Azure CLI is described as cross-platform and Batch Explorer is available for all OSes, the overall pattern places Windows tools and workflows before Linux alternatives, and omits explicit Linux-native examples or instructions.
Recommendations:
  • List Azure CLI before PowerShell in the command-line tools section to emphasize cross-platform parity.
  • When mentioning RDP for node access, also mention SSH for Linux nodes, with a link to instructions for SSH access.
  • Include explicit examples or references for Linux users, such as Bash scripts or Linux shell commands, alongside or before Windows/PowerShell examples.
  • Ensure that any tool or workflow described (such as file downloads or node access) includes Linux-relevant instructions or notes.
  • Consider adding a table or section that summarizes OS-specific guidance for common developer tasks in Azure Batch.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific file types and installation methods (such as .exe and .msi files) without providing equivalent Linux examples or mentioning Linux package formats. There are no examples or guidance for Linux tools, commands, or installation patterns, and the only executable and installer formats mentioned are Windows-centric.
Recommendations:
  • Include Linux-specific examples alongside Windows ones, such as referencing .sh scripts, .tar.gz archives, or .deb/.rpm packages.
  • When discussing installation commands, provide both Windows (e.g., msiexec, .exe) and Linux (e.g., bash install.sh, dpkg -i, rpm -i) equivalents.
  • Mention Linux tools and patterns for copying and installing applications, such as using wget, curl, scp, or package managers (apt, yum).
  • Avoid assuming the use of Windows by default; explicitly state that the guidance applies to both Windows and Linux nodes, and clarify any differences.
  • Provide example start task command lines for both Windows (cmd, PowerShell) and Linux (bash, shell scripts).

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page focuses exclusively on .NET and C# examples, which are most commonly associated with Windows development. It references the Azure portal and uses terminology such as 'Windows Azure Service Management API', and all code samples are in C#. There are no examples or guidance for Linux users, such as command-line registration with Azure CLI, nor are there any cross-platform code samples (e.g., Python, Java, or REST). The documentation implicitly assumes a Windows development environment and does not address Linux or macOS workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples for registering applications using the Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, making clear which commands work cross-platform.
  • Provide code samples in additional languages (such as Python or Java) that are commonly used on Linux.
  • Clarify that the .NET library and authentication flows are supported on Linux and macOS, and provide any necessary setup instructions.
  • Reference cross-platform tools and workflows (such as VS Code, Docker, or REST API usage) alongside or before Windows-specific tools.
  • Avoid using 'Windows Azure' terminology unless specifically referring to legacy services; use 'Azure' for modern, cross-platform services.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, highlighting any differences or additional steps required.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a clear Windows bias. All code examples are in C# and use Windows-centric command lines (e.g., 'cmd /c'), with no Linux shell equivalents provided. The only virtual machine image example is for Windows Server, and environment variable usage is explained for both platforms, but only Windows command syntax is shown in executable examples. There are no Linux-specific code samples, shell commands, or references to Linux tools or patterns.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux examples for all code snippets, especially for task command lines (e.g., show both 'cmd /c ...' and '/bin/bash -c ...').
  • Include examples of creating pools with Linux VM images (e.g., Ubuntu) alongside the Windows example.
  • Demonstrate how to reference and execute installed applications on Linux nodes using appropriate shell syntax.
  • Mention Linux-specific considerations (such as file permissions, path separators, and case sensitivity) where relevant.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows are treated equally (e.g., alternate or combine examples, rather than always presenting Windows first).

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page generally aims for cross-platform parity by referencing the Azure CLI and mentioning support for Windows, Mac, and Linux. However, in the file transfer section, all example paths use Windows-style paths (e.g., c:\source_videos\*.mp4), and there are no equivalent Linux/macOS path examples. This presents a subtle 'windows_first' and 'missing_linux_example' bias, as Linux users may not immediately recognize how to adapt the commands for their environment.
Recommendations:
  • For every CLI example that uses a Windows-style path, provide an equivalent Linux/macOS example (e.g., /home/user/source_videos/*.mp4).
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure CLI commands work on all supported platforms and that file paths should be adapted to the user's OS.
  • Where possible, use OS-agnostic placeholder paths in examples, or provide both Windows and Linux/macOS variants side by side.
  • Add a note or callout reminding users to adjust file paths for their operating system.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias by presenting Windows terminology and tools first (e.g., RDP before SSH), providing code examples that default to Windows node agent SKUs, and omitting explicit Linux-specific examples or commands. References to Windows-specific tools and patterns (such as RDP and nodeAgentSkuId for Windows) are more prominent, while Linux equivalents are only mentioned in passing or as secondary options.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux-focused examples alongside Windows ones, including explicit nodeAgentSkuId values for Linux pools.
  • When listing connection methods, mention SSH (Linux) before or alongside RDP (Windows), or present both equally.
  • Include sample code snippets and REST API request bodies for creating Linux-based pools, not just Windows.
  • Reference Linux tools and workflows (e.g., bash, Linux CLI commands) explicitly in relevant sections.
  • Ensure that all guidance (such as for Packer or image preparation) includes both Linux and Windows links and steps, not just Windows or generic instructions.
  • Avoid defaulting to Windows-specific values (like 'batch.node.windows amd64') in code samples; provide Linux alternatives or clarify how to select the appropriate value.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page provides detailed authentication steps and code samples for .NET and Python, but all portal navigation and setup instructions assume use of the Azure Portal GUI, without mention of CLI or scripting alternatives. There are no examples using Bash, Azure CLI, or Linux-native tools, and no guidance for users working in non-Windows environments. The .NET code samples implicitly target Windows users, and the Python example, while cross-platform, does not address Linux-specific setup or authentication nuances. There are no PowerShell-specific examples, but the absence of Linux/CLI parity and the focus on GUI steps indicate a Windows-first, GUI-centric bias.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions for registering applications, assigning permissions, and managing secrets using the Azure CLI (az) and/or Azure PowerShell, and present these before or alongside GUI steps.
  • Include Bash or shell script examples for authentication flows, especially for unattended/service principal scenarios.
  • Explicitly mention that the Python code is cross-platform and provide any Linux-specific notes (e.g., environment variable setup, dependency installation).
  • Provide guidance for headless or non-GUI environments (common in Linux), such as using device code authentication or service principal flows via CLI.
  • Where possible, balance the order of presentation so that CLI/Linux-native approaches are not always secondary to GUI/Windows-centric instructions.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation generally maintains platform neutrality but exhibits subtle Windows bias by listing the Windows documentation link before Linux in the FAQ and not providing concrete, step-by-step Linux command examples for certificate handling. Linux-specific guidance is less detailed, and practical examples for Linux users (such as shell commands or scripts) are missing.
Recommendations:
  • When referencing documentation for both Windows and Linux, alternate the order or present them together (e.g., 'See the documentation for Windows and Linux').
  • Provide explicit, step-by-step examples for Linux users, such as sample shell commands for copying certificates, adjusting permissions, or accessing Key Vault from a Linux Batch pool.
  • Ensure that all instructions and examples are equally detailed for both platforms, including code snippets or configuration samples for Linux where relevant.
  • Highlight any platform-specific considerations in parallel, rather than focusing on one OS before the other.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation generally presents Windows tools and patterns before Linux equivalents, such as listing 'cmd.exe' before '/bin/sh' and using Windows-style path examples and syntax. There is a tendency to describe Windows-specific details first, and some examples (e.g., directory postfixes) use Windows path separators without showing Linux equivalents. There are also references to Windows-specific environment variable naming conventions and tools, with less emphasis or detail for Linux.
Recommendations:
  • Present Linux and Windows examples side-by-side, or alternate which platform is shown first to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • For directory and path examples, always show both Windows (backslash) and Linux (slash) formats.
  • Where environment variable naming conventions differ (e.g., underscores vs. hash), clearly document both and provide explicit Linux examples.
  • Expand Linux-specific guidance, such as showing how to use shells other than /bin/sh (e.g., bash), and clarify any differences in behavior.
  • Avoid using only Windows tools (e.g., 'cmd.exe') in explanations; always provide the Linux equivalent with equal prominence.
  • Include Linux-specific notes where features are not available or behave differently, and ensure parity in example depth and clarity.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by describing Windows-specific paths and behaviors first and in more detail, providing a detailed table of Windows host/container paths, and omitting equivalent Linux path mappings. There are no Linux-specific code or path examples, and the documentation references Windows drive letters and conventions exclusively in path tables.
Recommendations:
  • Add a parallel table showing Linux host and container paths for each Azure Batch data path, using Linux filesystem conventions (e.g., /mnt/batch/tasks/applications).
  • Provide Linux-specific examples for configuring container isolation, including sample paths and mount behaviors.
  • Ensure that explanations and examples are presented in a platform-neutral order or provide Linux and Windows information side by side.
  • Reference Linux tools and conventions where appropriate, not just Windows drive letters and paths.
  • Clarify any platform-specific differences in behavior, and provide guidance for both Windows and Linux users equally.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: .NET (C#) and Windows-centric examples are consistently presented first and in greater detail, including code snippets that use Windows VM images (e.g., MicrosoftWindowsServer) and node agent SKUs for Windows. PowerShell and .NET SDKs are emphasized, with only a single Python example provided for Linux (Ubuntu) and no Bash/CLI or Linux shell examples. There are no explicit Linux command-line or scripting examples, and Windows terminology and tools are referenced more frequently and prominently than their Linux equivalents.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux-first or side-by-side examples for all SDKs, including Bash/CLI and Python, not just .NET/C#.
  • Include explicit Linux VM image references and node agent SKUs in .NET and other language examples, not just Windows.
  • Add examples using Azure CLI and Bash scripts for common operations (e.g., creating pools, enabling autoscale), to complement PowerShell and .NET code.
  • Ensure that Linux tools and workflows are mentioned with equal prominence and detail as Windows/PowerShell/.NET equivalents.
  • Review terminology and ordering to avoid always listing Windows/PowerShell/.NET first; alternate or parallelize with Linux/Python/CLI where possible.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page exclusively provides examples and code samples using the Batch .NET SDK in C# and references to C# sample projects. There are no examples or code snippets for Linux-oriented tools (such as Azure CLI, Bash, Python SDK, or REST via curl), nor are there references to cross-platform scripting or command-line usage. The documentation assumes a Windows/.NET development environment, which may disadvantage Linux or cross-platform users.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent code samples using the Azure CLI to demonstrate efficient list queries for Batch resources, including filter, select, and expand usage.
  • Provide examples using the Python SDK (azure-batch) to illustrate how to construct efficient queries in a cross-platform language.
  • Include REST API usage examples with curl or HTTPie, showing how to construct filter, select, and expand query strings.
  • Reference and link to sample projects or scripts that are cross-platform (e.g., Python, Bash) in addition to the C#/.NET samples.
  • Explicitly mention that the concepts apply to all platforms and provide guidance for users on Linux or macOS.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively providing Windows command-line examples (using 'cmd /c' and Windows environment variable syntax), referencing Windows file paths (with backslashes), and omitting any Linux or cross-platform shell examples. There is no mention of Bash, sh, or Linux-specific command lines, nor are there notes about cross-platform compatibility or how to adapt the examples for Linux compute nodes.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux/Bash shell examples for all command-line snippets (e.g., use 'bash -c' or 'sh -c' and appropriate environment variable and path syntax).
  • Explicitly mention that Batch compute nodes can run both Windows and Linux, and clarify any differences in job preparation/release task scripting.
  • Add a section or callout explaining how to write cross-platform scripts for job preparation and release tasks, including tips for detecting the OS and using portable commands.
  • Update sample output and file paths to include Linux-style paths (forward slashes) and environment variable syntax ($VAR).
  • Where Windows tools or patterns are mentioned, provide Linux equivalents (e.g., 'del' vs. 'rm', '%VAR%' vs. '$VAR').

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page exclusively provides .NET (C#) code samples and instructions, which are typically associated with Windows development environments. There is no mention of Linux or cross-platform considerations, nor are there any examples or notes about running the .NET library or code on Linux systems. The only sample project referenced is in C#, and there are no alternative language or platform examples. This creates a subtle Windows bias by omission, as it assumes a Windows/.NET-centric development context and does not address Linux users or cross-platform usage.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state that the Batch Management .NET library and its code samples are cross-platform and can be used on Linux and macOS as well as Windows, especially since .NET Core/.NET 5+ is supported on these platforms.
  • Provide instructions or notes for setting up the development environment on Linux (e.g., installing .NET SDK, using VS Code or other editors, running the code from the terminal).
  • Include at least one example of running the code or configuring authentication on Linux (e.g., using environment variables for DefaultAzureCredential).
  • Mention any Linux-specific considerations or troubleshooting tips, if applicable.
  • Reference or link to equivalent documentation or samples in other languages that are popular on Linux (e.g., Python, Java), or at least mention their existence in the 'Next steps' section.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-based examples and tools. The only detailed code samples are in C# using the Batch .NET library, which is most commonly used on Windows. The .NET example for pool creation uses a Windows Server image, and there are no equivalent Linux-focused .NET code samples. While the REST API example uses Ubuntu, there are no Linux shell, Bash, or cross-platform scripting examples. The GitHub sample project is a C# console application, further reinforcing the Windows/.NET focus. There is no mention of Linux-specific tools, shell commands, or cross-platform SDKs (e.g., Python, CLI).
Recommendations:
  • Add Linux-focused .NET code samples, e.g., using an Ubuntu image in the VirtualMachineConfiguration section.
  • Provide equivalent examples using the Azure Batch Python SDK, which is widely used on Linux.
  • Include Bash or shell command examples for common operations (e.g., using Azure CLI to create pools and tasks).
  • Mention and link to cross-platform tools (such as Azure CLI and Python SDK) alongside or before Windows/.NET tools.
  • Ensure that code snippets and sample projects are available in multiple languages and platforms, not just C#/.NET.
  • Explicitly state that Azure Batch supports both Windows and Linux nodes, and provide parity in documentation examples.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All code samples, configuration snippets, and walkthroughs use Windows-specific tools (MS-MPI, cmd.exe, .NET/C#), and reference Windows VM images. The installation and execution commands are exclusively for Windows (e.g., MSMpiSetup.exe, cmd /c, mpiexec.exe), and there are no Linux shell or Python examples. Linux and Intel MPI are only mentioned in passing, with no practical guidance or code samples. The code sample and step-by-step instructions require Visual Studio and Windows development tools, with no Linux equivalents or parity.
Recommendations:
  • Add parallel Linux-focused sections and code samples using Python SDK or Azure CLI, demonstrating how to configure and run multi-instance tasks on Linux pools.
  • Provide equivalent shell/bash commands for installing Intel MPI on Linux nodes using StartTask, and show how to run MPI applications with mpirun.
  • Include Linux VM pool configuration examples (e.g., Ubuntu images) and show how to set up pools for Linux-based MPI workloads.
  • Reference and link to Linux sample repositories more prominently, and provide walkthroughs for building and running MPI applications on Linux.
  • Ensure that both Windows and Linux examples are presented side-by-side or in separate clearly marked sections, so users of either platform can follow the documentation equally.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation provides both Linux and Windows guidance, but there is a notable Windows bias in several areas. Windows examples and tools (such as PowerShell and Remote Desktop) are mentioned explicitly and sometimes before their Linux equivalents. The detailed example for installing Microsoft MPI is only provided for Windows, and the process involves Windows-specific tools. In the pool configuration examples, Windows images and settings are often listed first or in more detail. There is also a reliance on Windows-specific tools (e.g., PowerShell, RDP) in the workflow descriptions.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux-first or parallel Linux and Windows examples in all sections, especially in step-by-step guides.
  • Include explicit Linux command-line examples (e.g., using SSH, Bash scripts) where Windows tools like PowerShell or RDP are referenced.
  • Add a detailed example for setting up MPI on Linux pools, mirroring the Windows MPI example.
  • Ensure that all configuration tables and sample settings are presented in a balanced order (alternating or side-by-side for Linux and Windows).
  • Where possible, use cross-platform tools or provide both Windows and Linux command lines/scripts for tasks like driver installation and VM configuration.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Heavy
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-related information and terminology. The 'cloudServiceConfiguration' section is exclusively Windows-focused, referencing only Windows Server OS families. The documentation provides more detail and explicit references for Windows (e.g., Windows Server versions, Windows-specific configuration), while Linux is only mentioned in passing (e.g., in a link to VM sizes and a note that 'windowsConfiguration' must not be set for Linux images). There are no Linux-specific configuration examples or details.
Recommendations:
  • Add a dedicated section for Linux configuration, similar to the 'windowsConfiguration' section, describing relevant Linux settings (e.g., SSH configuration, user setup, extensions).
  • Provide explicit Linux OS family/version examples and references, not just Windows Server versions.
  • Ensure that Linux and Windows VM size links are presented together and with equal prominence.
  • Include example JSON snippets for both Windows and Linux pool configurations.
  • Clarify in the documentation when a property is Linux-specific, Windows-specific, or applicable to both, to avoid implicit Windows-first assumptions.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits a mild Windows bias by mentioning Windows-specific configuration (automatic updates) without providing equivalent information for Linux pools. There are no OS-specific command-line examples, but the only explicit OS distinction is for Windows, and Linux parity is not addressed in those sections.
Recommendations:
  • Where Windows-specific settings are discussed (e.g., enableAutomaticUpdates), provide equivalent information for Linux pools, such as how updates are handled or configured on Linux nodes.
  • Explicitly mention differences in node management, error states, or troubleshooting steps for Linux pools where applicable.
  • If there are OS-specific behaviors (such as log file locations, update mechanisms, or disk management), include parallel guidance for both Windows and Linux.
  • Consider adding examples or notes that clarify when instructions or recommendations apply to all OS types versus only Windows.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only a C# SDK example that uses a Windows VM image (MicrosoftWindowsServer) and node agent (batch.node.windows amd64), with no equivalent example for Linux VM images or Linux node agents. There are no Linux-specific examples, commands, or references to Linux tools or patterns. The documentation implicitly prioritizes Windows by example and omits Linux parity.
Recommendations:
  • Add parallel examples using Linux VM images (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS) and the appropriate Linux node agent SKU in the C# SDK example.
  • Explicitly mention both Windows and Linux options when discussing VM image configuration, including sample publisher/offer/sku values for popular Linux distributions.
  • Provide at least one example that updates a pool to use a Linux image, including the correct nodeAgentSkuId for Linux.
  • Where relevant, mention any Linux-specific considerations or differences in pool property updates.
  • Ensure that REST/HTTP and SDK examples are balanced between Windows and Linux scenarios.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation provides both PowerShell and Azure CLI commands for listing VM sizes and images, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is consistently mentioned first in all lists and examples. There are no Linux-specific shell examples (e.g., Bash), and the documentation does not mention or demonstrate Linux-native tools or patterns, despite Azure CLI being cross-platform. This ordering and tool selection subtly prioritize Windows users and workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Alternate the order of PowerShell and Azure CLI in lists and examples, or list Azure CLI first to reflect its cross-platform nature.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands can be run on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide Bash shell examples where appropriate.
  • Where possible, include Linux-native command-line patterns (e.g., Bash scripting) alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Add a note clarifying that PowerShell Core is available cross-platform, but that Azure CLI is the recommended tool for Linux users.
  • Review other documentation pages for similar ordering and tool selection to ensure consistent cross-platform parity.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias by presenting Windows-specific tools, commands, and patterns before or in greater detail than their Linux equivalents. Examples for file copying and mounting Azure Files are provided only for Windows (using cmdkey, net use, and Windows-style azcopy syntax), while Linux mounting and usage are referenced but not exemplified. The documentation also references Windows tools and workflows (e.g., PowerShell, cmdkey, net use) without providing parallel Linux command-line examples or explicit parity in instructions.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux command-line examples for all file copy and mounting operations, such as using azcopy with Linux syntax, and mounting Azure Files with mount.cifs or SMB utilities.
  • Ensure that for every Windows-specific tool or workflow mentioned (e.g., cmdkey, net use), a Linux equivalent (e.g., smbclient, mount -t cifs) is described and exemplified.
  • Present Linux and Windows examples side-by-side or in parallel sections, rather than Windows-first or Windows-only.
  • Include explicit instructions and code snippets for mounting Azure Files on Linux VMs, not just referencing blobfuse.
  • Review the order of presentation to avoid always listing Windows tools and workflows before Linux equivalents.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page does not provide explicit examples or instructions that are Windows-specific, but it does exhibit subtle Windows bias by referencing the Batch .NET client library before Python in the 'Next steps' section. There are no Linux-specific examples, tools, or workflows mentioned, and the documentation does not clarify cross-platform considerations or provide parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Present cross-platform SDKs and tools in a neutral or rotating order (e.g., list Python and .NET together, or alternate which is mentioned first).
  • Explicitly mention that Batch supports both Windows and Linux compute nodes, and provide links to documentation or quickstarts for both platforms.
  • Include examples or references for Linux users, such as Bash scripts or Linux command-line tools, where appropriate.
  • Highlight any platform-specific considerations (e.g., differences in application packaging or node setup between Windows and Linux).
  • Ensure that all referenced tools (such as Batch Explorer) are clearly marked as cross-platform or provide alternatives if they are Windows-only.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows tools and patterns (such as RDP, PowerShell, and Windows-specific instructions) are mentioned before or more prominently than their Linux equivalents. Some examples and instructions are Windows-centric or list Windows first, and there is a lack of parity in providing Linux-specific command-line or tool examples (e.g., no Bash or Linux shell script examples).
Recommendations:
  • When listing tools or connection methods (e.g., RDP for Windows, SSH for Linux), present both options equally and in parallel, not with Windows first.
  • For every PowerShell example or reference, provide an equivalent Bash or Linux shell example where possible.
  • When referencing Azure CLI or SDKs, include explicit Linux usage examples (e.g., Bash scripts, Linux shell commands) alongside or before Windows/PowerShell examples.
  • In sections describing how to connect to VMs, provide step-by-step instructions for both RDP (Windows) and SSH (Linux), not just a brief mention.
  • Ensure that all prerequisites and setup steps are described for both Windows and Linux environments, including any OS-specific considerations.
  • Review the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows are given equal prominence, or alternate which is listed first.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. All code examples use Windows command-line syntax (cmd.exe /c echo ...), and there are no Linux or cross-platform shell examples. The documentation refers exclusively to Windows tools (cmd.exe), and does not mention Linux shells (bash/sh) or provide equivalent Linux command examples. The structure and examples assume a Windows environment by default, with no guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • For every code example using Windows command-line (cmd.exe), provide an equivalent Linux shell (bash/sh) example, e.g., 'bash -c "echo Flowers"'.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure Batch supports both Windows and Linux compute nodes, and clarify any differences in task command line syntax.
  • Add a section or note explaining how to adapt the examples for Linux pools, including differences in shell invocation and exit code handling if applicable.
  • Avoid using Windows tools exclusively in examples; use cross-platform commands where possible (e.g., 'echo' is available on both platforms, but the shell invocation differs).
  • Where possible, provide side-by-side or tabbed code samples for Windows and Linux to improve parity and accessibility for all users.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates bias toward Windows environments by exclusively providing .NET (C#) code samples, referencing Visual Studio as the development environment, and mentioning Windows-specific tools and patterns (such as .exe executables and Visual Studio solutions). There are no examples or guidance for Linux users, alternative development environments, or cross-platform .NET usage. The documentation assumes a Windows-centric workflow and does not address Linux or macOS scenarios.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent code samples and instructions for .NET development on Linux and macOS, including use of cross-platform editors like VS Code and command-line tools like dotnet CLI.
  • Mention and demonstrate how to run and build the sample projects using the dotnet CLI, which is available on all major platforms.
  • Clarify that the .NET File Conventions library can be used on Linux and macOS, and provide any necessary setup or troubleshooting tips for those environments.
  • Avoid references to Windows-specific file extensions (such as .exe) or provide Linux equivalents (such as .dll or cross-platform .NET Core executables).
  • Include guidance for uploading application packages and running tasks from Linux/macOS, not just via the Azure portal or Windows tools.
  • Explicitly state platform compatibility and provide links to cross-platform .NET documentation.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a strong Windows bias: all code samples use Windows-specific command syntax (cmd.exe), file paths use backslashes by default, and there are no Linux/bash equivalents provided. The only mention of Linux is a note telling users to change backslashes to forward slashes, without any actual Linux example. The code sample and workflow are centered around C#/.NET and Visual Studio, with no mention of cross-platform development tools or languages. The sample project is a Visual Studio solution, further reinforcing the Windows-centric approach.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Linux/bash command examples for task commands (e.g., use bash shell syntax in addition to cmd.exe).
  • Show file path examples using both Windows (\) and Linux (/) conventions, or use platform-agnostic path joining.
  • Include code samples in at least one cross-platform language (e.g., Python) in addition to C#.
  • Mention and demonstrate how to use cross-platform development tools (e.g., VS Code, CLI) rather than only Visual Studio.
  • Explicitly document any platform-specific considerations (e.g., line endings, shell differences) and provide guidance for both Windows and Linux users.
  • Reference and link to Linux-specific Azure Batch documentation or guides, if available.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively providing examples for Windows-based pools (e.g., using MicrosoftWindowsServer images and Windows-specific nodeAgentSKUId), referencing Windows-specific configuration properties (such as windowsConfiguration.enableAutomaticUpdates), and omitting any Linux-based pool configuration or examples. There are no Linux image references, node agent SKUs, or Linux-specific configuration guidance, which may mislead users into thinking Auto OS Upgrade is only for Windows pools or make it harder for Linux users to adopt the feature.
Recommendations:
  • Add parallel examples for Linux-based pools in both REST API and SDK sections, using a popular Linux image (e.g., Ubuntu) and the appropriate nodeAgentSKUId (e.g., batch.node.ubuntu 20.04).
  • Include Linux-specific configuration properties and clarify any differences in upgrade behavior or requirements for Linux pools.
  • In the requirements section, mention both Windows and Linux configuration properties (e.g., clarify that windowsConfiguration.enableAutomaticUpdates is not relevant for Linux, and note any Linux equivalents if applicable).
  • In all code and JSON samples, provide both Windows and Linux variants, or at least alternate between them to ensure parity.
  • Explicitly state that Auto OS Upgrade is supported for both Windows and Linux pools (if true), and link to documentation listing supported Linux images.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell as the only example for programmatically checking VM support for ephemeral OS disks, without mentioning or providing equivalent Linux/CLI commands. Additionally, the only explicit tooling example for querying capabilities is PowerShell, and there is no mention of Bash, Azure CLI, or cross-platform alternatives. While the code samples for SDK usage are platform-neutral (Python and C#), the operational guidance prioritizes Windows tools.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI and/or Bash examples for checking VM series support for ephemeral OS disks, alongside or before the PowerShell example.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI) in the section about programmatically querying VM capabilities.
  • Ensure that all operational instructions and examples are provided for both Windows and Linux users, not just PowerShell.
  • Consider linking to documentation or guides that show how to perform the same tasks on Linux/macOS environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows-first bias in several areas. Windows tools and patterns (such as cmd.exe, Windows Data Protection API, and RDP) are mentioned before or instead of Linux equivalents. Code examples for running tasks often default to Windows command lines (e.g., 'cmd /c echo hello'), and Windows-specific features are described in more detail or earlier than Linux ones. Some Linux-specific details (such as SSH or Linux user configuration) are present but less emphasized, and there are missing Linux command-line examples in several code snippets.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux shell command examples (e.g., 'bash -c "echo hello"') alongside or before Windows 'cmd.exe' examples in all code snippets.
  • When referencing Windows tools (e.g., DPAPI, RDP), also mention Linux equivalents (e.g., GnuPG, SSH, or Linux file permissions) and provide links or explanations.
  • Ensure that all code samples that show Windows VM configuration or user account creation also include equally detailed Linux examples, not just in .NET but in all supported languages.
  • In sections discussing remote access, mention SSH for Linux before or alongside RDP for Windows, and provide parity in guidance and links.
  • Review the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows are treated equally, or alternate which OS is presented first in each section.
  • Explicitly call out any OS-specific limitations or differences to help users understand cross-platform implications.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits subtle Windows bias. While it covers general Azure Batch and networking concepts, it tends to mention Windows-specific tools, ports, and patterns before their Linux equivalents. For example, remote access ports are listed as '3389 (Windows), 22 (Linux)', with Windows (RDP) always preceding Linux (SSH). There is also a lack of explicit Linux CLI or scripting examples (e.g., Bash), and the prerequisites mention Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI. No Linux-specific tooling or command-line examples are provided, and there is no demonstration of Linux-native workflows.
Recommendations:
  • When listing ports or OS-specific details, alternate the order (e.g., mention Linux/SSH before Windows/RDP in some places) or present them together without preference.
  • Provide explicit Linux/Bash command-line examples alongside PowerShell, especially for common tasks like creating virtual networks or subnets.
  • Include references to Linux-native tools and workflows (e.g., Bash scripts, Linux CLI usage) in the prerequisites and examples.
  • Ensure that all instructions and screenshots are OS-agnostic or provide both Windows and Linux perspectives where relevant.
  • Where Azure CLI is mentioned, clarify that it is cross-platform and provide sample commands for both Windows (PowerShell/CMD) and Linux (Bash).

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation generally covers both Windows and Linux nodes, but there are subtle biases: Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., .exe, .cmd, .bat, PowerShell, RDP, Windows Server containers) are mentioned before or more prominently than their Linux equivalents. Some sections (like container support) provide detailed Windows instructions but lack equivalent Linux guidance. There are no Linux-specific command or configuration examples, and Linux tools (e.g., SSH, shell scripts) are referenced less prominently.
Recommendations:
  • When listing supported script types, mention Linux formats (e.g., shell scripts, Python scripts) before or alongside Windows formats.
  • In sections discussing remote access, mention SSH for Linux before or equally with RDP for Windows.
  • For container support, provide explicit instructions and examples for both Windows and Linux nodes, including recommended Linux images and setup steps.
  • Include Linux-specific examples and references (e.g., mounting disks, using shell scripts in start tasks) wherever Windows examples are given.
  • Ensure parity in tool and terminology references (e.g., don't only mention PowerShell or .exe; include bash, sh, and ELF binaries).

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. In several sections, Windows tools (such as PowerShell cmdlets) are mentioned before or more prominently than their Linux equivalents. Some examples and troubleshooting steps are provided only for Windows (e.g., using PowerShell's Get-Disk), while Linux examples are less detailed or appear after Windows. In some cases, only Windows-specific issues (like directory junctions) are discussed, and Linux alternatives are not equally covered. There are also references to .NET SDKs and Windows configuration properties before mentioning cross-platform or Linux options.
Recommendations:
  • Ensure that all examples and tooling references are provided for both Windows and Linux, and that Linux examples are as detailed as Windows ones.
  • When listing tools or APIs (e.g., PowerShell, Azure CLI), mention cross-platform tools (like Azure CLI) first or alongside Windows-specific tools.
  • Provide Linux shell command examples (e.g., using lsblk, fdisk, mkfs) wherever PowerShell examples are given, and ensure parity in the level of detail.
  • Include troubleshooting tips and best practices for Linux nodes with the same prominence as for Windows nodes.
  • Avoid Windows-specific terminology or patterns (such as .NET classes or Windows Services) without also providing Linux equivalents (such as systemd).
  • Where Windows-specific issues are discussed (e.g., directory junctions), add corresponding Linux guidance (e.g., symlinks, mount points) for completeness.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by listing Azure PowerShell as a primary method for creating public IP addresses, and mentioning it before providing any Linux-specific or cross-platform alternatives. While the Azure CLI is mentioned (which is cross-platform), there are no explicit Linux shell or Bash examples, and PowerShell is called out by name. No Linux-specific tools or command-line examples are provided, and the documentation does not clarify parity or differences between Windows and Linux environments for these operations.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit Bash or Linux shell examples for creating public IP addresses using Azure CLI, including sample commands.
  • List Azure CLI (which is cross-platform) before Azure PowerShell in the list of methods, or clarify that both are supported equally.
  • Clarify that all steps can be performed from Linux, macOS, or Windows, and highlight any OS-specific considerations if they exist.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, also mention Bash or other Linux-native shells to ensure parity.
  • Consider adding a table or section comparing the steps for Windows and Linux users, or explicitly stating that the process is OS-agnostic when using Azure CLI.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All code examples are exclusively in PowerShell, with no Linux shell or cross-platform alternatives provided. Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., PowerShell cmdlets, .msi installers, Windows Management Framework) are referenced throughout, and instructions for certificate creation, service principal setup, and Key Vault access are all tailored to Windows environments. There is no mention of Linux equivalents or guidance for users on Linux-based Batch nodes.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Bash/CLI examples for certificate creation (e.g., using OpenSSL) and service principal setup (e.g., using Azure CLI).
  • Include instructions for installing necessary Azure libraries on Linux nodes (e.g., Azure CLI, Python SDK).
  • Demonstrate how to authenticate to Azure Key Vault from Linux Batch nodes using certificates and managed identities.
  • Avoid assuming PowerShell is the default scripting environment; offer cross-platform guidance.
  • Reference Linux tools and patterns alongside Windows ones, and ensure both are given equal prominence.
  • Add a section or callouts specifically for Linux users, linking to relevant documentation (e.g., 'using Linux compute nodes').

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation generally maintains OS neutrality, but in the 'Connect to compute nodes' section, Windows (RDP) is mentioned before Linux (SSH), and no concrete command-line examples are provided for either OS. In the troubleshooting section, instructions reference examining 'event logs' without clarifying this is a Windows-specific tool, and there are no Linux log equivalents or examples. There are no PowerShell-heavy or Windows-only tool references, but Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and examples are missing.
Recommendations:
  • When describing remote connection methods, present Linux (SSH) and Windows (RDP) options in parallel, or alternate their order in different sections.
  • Provide explicit examples for both Windows (e.g., using RDP) and Linux (e.g., using SSH) for connecting to nodes, including sample commands.
  • In troubleshooting sections, mention both Windows event logs and Linux log files (e.g., /var/log/syslog, /var/log/messages) for parity.
  • Where possible, include code snippets or command-line examples for both platforms (e.g., using SSH to connect to Linux nodes, or using Windows Remote Desktop for Windows nodes).
  • Clarify when instructions or tools are OS-specific, and provide equivalent guidance for the other OS.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation generally maintains cross-platform language, but there are subtle signs of Windows bias. In the section on specifying the command line for tasks, the Windows example (cmd.exe) is listed before the Linux example (/bin/sh). Additionally, the 'robocopy' tool (Windows-specific) is mentioned as an example for copying files in a start task, without mentioning a Linux equivalent like 'cp' or 'rsync'. No Linux-specific tools are referenced in parallel, and the examples and tool mentions may lead Linux users to feel less directly supported.
Recommendations:
  • When providing command line examples, alternate the order or present Linux and Windows examples side by side, or even lead with Linux examples where appropriate.
  • When referencing platform-specific tools (e.g., 'robocopy'), also mention Linux equivalents such as 'cp' or 'rsync' to ensure parity.
  • Explicitly state that examples are provided for both Windows and Linux, and ensure that for every Windows-specific example or tool, a Linux counterpart is included.
  • Consider including a table or section summarizing common commands and tools for both platforms in the context of Azure Batch tasks.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation presents PowerShell examples before Azure CLI, which may suggest a Windows-first perspective. The PowerShell section is detailed and uses Windows-centric tooling, while the CLI section, though present, comes after. There are no explicit Linux-only tools or shell patterns, but the ordering and emphasis could be perceived as favoring Windows users.
Recommendations:
  • Present Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell examples, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and more familiar to Linux users.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work natively on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Include bash-specific notes or examples (e.g., using export, or referencing Linux shell conventions) to reinforce Linux parity.
  • If possible, add a short section or note about using these commands in Linux environments, including any prerequisites or differences.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation generally maintains cross-platform parity, but there is a subtle Windows bias in the ordering of examples and references. Specifically, in the section on obtaining managed identity tokens within Batch nodes, the PowerShell (Windows) example is presented before the Bash (Linux) example. Additionally, the reference link for the Azure Instance Metadata Service points to the Windows-specific documentation. However, both Windows and Linux examples are present, and the overall content does not omit Linux instructions or tools.
Recommendations:
  • Present Linux and Windows examples in parallel or alternate the order to avoid always listing Windows first.
  • Use neutral or combined documentation links (e.g., a general Instance Metadata Service page, or both Windows and Linux links).
  • Ensure that any code samples, tips, or references that are platform-specific are clearly labeled and that Linux is given equal prominence.
  • Consider adding explicit notes about cross-platform support where relevant, to reassure users of Linux parity.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. While it mentions both Linux and Windows monitoring agents and extensions, Windows tools and .NET libraries are referenced more prominently and with more detailed examples. There are no Linux-specific code samples or references to Linux-native tools or SDKs, and the only application-level monitoring walkthrough is for a .NET (Windows-centric) solution. No PowerShell or CMD examples are present, but the lack of Linux CLI or SDK examples and the focus on Windows/.NET tools indicate a Windows-first approach.
Recommendations:
  • Add Linux-specific examples for accessing and analyzing Batch logs, such as using Azure CLI, Bash scripts, or Python SDK.
  • Provide walkthroughs or code samples for monitoring Batch from Linux environments, not just .NET/Windows.
  • Mention and link to cross-platform SDKs (e.g., Python, Java) and show how to use them for monitoring tasks.
  • Include references to Linux-native tools (e.g., jq for JSON parsing, Bash scripting) when discussing log file access and analysis.
  • Ensure parity in agent/extension documentation by providing equal detail and examples for both Linux and Windows.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation claims to cover both Linux and Windows pools but does not provide any concrete examples or instructions for either platform. However, it notably lacks any Linux-specific guidance or examples for mounting Azure file shares, which is a common area where Windows/PowerShell examples are often prioritized or exclusively provided.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit, step-by-step instructions for mounting Azure file shares on Linux Batch pool nodes, including example commands (e.g., using mount.cifs or SMB utilities).
  • Ensure parity by providing both Linux (bash/CLI) and Windows (PowerShell/GUI) examples side by side.
  • Reference Linux-specific troubleshooting and best practices for Azure Files (e.g., required packages, handling credentials securely).
  • Clearly indicate in each section which instructions apply to Linux, Windows, or both.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a strong Windows bias. It exclusively references Windows tools and patterns, such as Visual Studio, the Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.WindowsServer NuGet package, and Windows-specific VM images. All code and configuration examples assume a Windows environment, including PowerShell commands and Windows batch commands (cmd /c). There is no mention of Linux equivalents, nor are there any Linux-specific instructions or examples for integrating Application Insights with Azure Batch on Linux compute nodes.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux instructions and examples, including how to install and configure Application Insights on Linux-based Batch nodes.
  • Include Linux-friendly package installation commands (e.g., dotnet CLI, apt, yum) and avoid assuming Visual Studio as the only development environment.
  • Show how to configure Application Insights for .NET Core/.NET 5+ applications running on Linux, including relevant config file locations and environment variables.
  • Demonstrate how to set up Batch pools using Linux VM images, and provide sample pool configuration for both Windows and Linux.
  • Replace or supplement PowerShell and cmd examples with Bash or shell script equivalents.
  • Clarify any platform-specific limitations or differences in Application Insights support between Windows and Linux.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation provides step-by-step instructions for associating an Azure Batch account with a network security perimeter using the Azure portal, PowerShell, and Azure CLI. The PowerShell example is given before the Azure CLI example, which can be interpreted as a Windows-first ordering. The PowerShell section is detailed and uses Windows-centric tooling, which may be less familiar or accessible to Linux/macOS users. However, the inclusion of Azure CLI instructions does provide cross-platform coverage, as Azure CLI is available on all major operating systems. There are no Linux-specific shell (e.g., Bash) examples or explicit mention of Linux tools, but the CLI coverage partially mitigates this.
Recommendations:
  • Present Azure CLI examples before PowerShell examples, as CLI is cross-platform and more inclusive for Linux/macOS users.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows to encourage non-Windows users.
  • Optionally, include Bash script examples or notes for Linux users, especially for automation scenarios.
  • Consider providing parity in troubleshooting or environment setup notes for both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux (Bash/CLI) environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively providing instructions and examples for creating and using Windows-based compute nodes (specifically Windows Server 2019) in Azure Batch. The task command line example uses Windows-specific commands (cmd, set, timeout), and there is no mention of Linux pools, Linux VM images, or equivalent Bash command lines. No Linux or cross-platform alternatives are provided at any step.
Recommendations:
  • Include parallel instructions and screenshots for creating a Linux-based pool (e.g., using Ubuntu or CentOS images) alongside the Windows example.
  • Provide Linux-equivalent command line examples for tasks (e.g., using Bash: `bash -c 'env | grep AZ_BATCH; sleep 90'`).
  • Explicitly mention that Azure Batch supports both Windows and Linux nodes, and help users choose the appropriate OS for their workloads.
  • Where possible, use cross-platform language or clarify when steps are OS-specific.
  • Add a section or callout guiding users to Linux-specific documentation or quickstarts if available.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation primarily describes deployment using the Azure Portal and briefly mentions Azure PowerShell, Azure CLI, and REST API as alternatives. However, it links only to the PowerShell deployment guide and does not provide direct examples or links for Linux users (e.g., Bash/CLI instructions). The order of mention and linking prioritizes Windows-centric tools, and there are no Linux-specific examples or parity in guidance.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit Azure CLI (Bash) deployment instructions or links alongside PowerShell, ensuring both Windows and Linux users are equally supported.
  • When referencing alternative deployment methods, list Azure CLI before or alongside PowerShell, not after.
  • Provide example commands for both PowerShell and Azure CLI in the documentation, or link to both sets of instructions.
  • Include a note clarifying that the Azure CLI is cross-platform and suitable for Linux, macOS, and Windows users.
  • Ensure that all referenced guides (such as 'Deploy templates') include both PowerShell and CLI tabs/examples.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a clear Windows bias. It exclusively uses Windows Server for compute nodes, configures the pool with a Windows image, and provides only Windows command-line examples (e.g., 'cmd /c type'). There are no Linux VM or command-line examples, and the workflow assumes Windows environments for both pool configuration and task execution. Linux equivalents are not mentioned or demonstrated.
Recommendations:
  • Add parallel Linux examples throughout the documentation, including pool creation with a Linux Marketplace image and corresponding VirtualMachineConfiguration/ImageReference code.
  • Show how to specify a Linux command line for tasks (e.g., using '/bin/bash -c cat ...' instead of 'cmd /c type ...').
  • Explicitly mention that Azure Batch supports both Windows and Linux pools, and provide guidance on choosing and configuring each.
  • Include sample code snippets and configuration for both Windows and Linux scenarios side by side.
  • Clarify in the prerequisites and instructions that the quickstart can be completed on both Windows and Linux development environments, and provide any OS-specific notes as needed.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides only C# code examples and general Azure Batch concepts, with no mention of Windows-specific tools or patterns. However, it lacks any Linux- or cross-platform-specific examples, shell commands, or references to Linux environments, which may make it less accessible to users working in Linux or non-Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Linux shell (bash) or Python examples for creating and using resource files, especially for common scenarios like downloading files from Azure Storage.
  • Include notes or sections on how resource files are handled on Linux Batch nodes, such as file permissions, path conventions, or troubleshooting tips.
  • Reference cross-platform tools (e.g., az CLI, curl, wget) alongside or instead of Windows-centric tools.
  • Explicitly state that the examples are cross-platform where applicable, or provide guidance for both Windows and Linux users.
  • If PowerShell or Windows command-line examples are added in the future, ensure Linux equivalents are provided in parallel.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a strong Windows bias. It exclusively uses Windows Server VM images for compute pools, references Windows-specific ffmpeg builds and command-line syntax (cmd /c, .exe), and names pools and jobs with 'Win' prefixes. There are no examples or guidance for running the workload on Linux pools, nor are Linux-compatible ffmpeg packages or shell syntax shown. The workflow and code are tailored to Windows environments, with no parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux examples: Show how to configure a Batch pool with a Linux VM image (e.g., Ubuntu), including the necessary BatchImageReference and node agent SKU values.
  • Demonstrate Linux-compatible ffmpeg usage: Reference a Linux build of ffmpeg, and show how to package and use it as an application package.
  • Show Linux shell command lines: Include examples using bash/sh syntax (e.g., ./ffmpeg instead of ffmpeg.exe, and without cmd /c).
  • Use neutral naming: Avoid pool/job names like 'WinFFmpegPool' and use OS-neutral identifiers.
  • Add guidance for cross-platform support: Explain how to adapt the sample for both Windows and Linux, and highlight any differences in configuration or command lines.
  • Mention both OS options early: In the prerequisites and pool creation sections, explicitly mention that both Windows and Linux pools are supported and provide links or code for both.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation generally states that Azure Batch supports both Linux and Windows, but there are several subtle biases toward Windows. Windows-specific security configuration (TLS/cipher suites) is discussed in detail, with direct links to Windows Server documentation, while equivalent Linux guidance is missing. The only command-line tool explicitly referenced for querying supported images is PowerShell, with the Azure CLI mentioned only as an afterthought. There are no Linux-specific examples or references to Linux security practices (e.g., SSH hardening, Linux-specific patching guidance), and Windows terminology (RDP, registry settings) is more prominent and explained in greater detail.
Recommendations:
  • Add Linux-specific security guidance, such as links to official documentation on securing SSH, managing Linux TLS/cipher suites, and patching best practices.
  • When referencing command-line tools, provide Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell, and ensure parity in instructions.
  • Include explicit Linux examples or notes wherever Windows-specific details are provided (e.g., mention SSH configuration and hardening alongside RDP).
  • Balance references to Windows and Linux tools/documentation, ensuring both are equally discoverable and detailed.
  • Where OS-specific configuration is discussed (such as TLS/SSL settings), provide equivalent Linux instructions or links to authoritative Linux resources.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation generally maintains cross-platform neutrality, but in the troubleshooting section, the Windows PowerShell command (Test-TcpConnection) is listed before the Linux equivalent (nc), and the Windows command is labeled with a platform-specific comment. This ordering and explicit mention of PowerShell can be interpreted as a subtle Windows-first and PowerShell-heavy bias. No other examples, tools, or instructions are Windows-specific, and Linux is mentioned where relevant (e.g., Ubuntu image in REST example).
Recommendations:
  • Present Linux and Windows command-line examples in parallel or alternate the order (e.g., show Linux first in some sections).
  • Use neutral phrasing such as 'On Windows, use...' and 'On Linux, use...' instead of always listing Windows first.
  • Where possible, provide cross-platform commands or scripts (e.g., using Azure CLI, which is available on both platforms) as primary examples.
  • Ensure that any screenshots or UI references are not Windows-centric unless the feature is truly Windows-only.
  • Review other sections for subtle ordering or terminology that may imply Windows is the default or preferred platform.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias by exclusively providing instructions and examples that assume a Windows environment. It specifies the use of Windows-based Batch node images (Dsvm Win 2019), uses Windows command-line syntax (cmd /c), and does not mention or provide alternatives for Linux-based Batch pools or Linux command-line usage. All tooling (Batch Explorer, Storage Explorer) is cross-platform, but the workflow and commands are tailored to Windows, with no guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions for creating a Batch pool with a Linux image (e.g., Ubuntu) and provide equivalent steps.
  • Provide Linux shell command equivalents (e.g., use bash syntax instead of cmd /c) for installing Python packages and running scripts.
  • Show how to specify a Linux start task (e.g., /bin/bash -c "pip install ...") and how to run the Python script in a Linux environment.
  • Clarify that Batch Explorer and Storage Explorer are cross-platform, and note any differences in usage or UI on Linux.
  • Add screenshots or notes for Linux users where UI or workflow may differ.
  • Explicitly mention Linux as a supported platform in the prerequisites and throughout the tutorial.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. PowerShell is used as the primary scripting interface for both Windows and Linux examples, rather than showing native Linux shell commands. Windows tools and patterns (e.g., 'net use', 'cmdkey') are described in detail, and Windows-specific troubleshooting steps and references are often presented before or more prominently than their Linux equivalents. The documentation also references Windows tools and workflows in several places, sometimes before mentioning Linux alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Provide native Linux shell (bash) examples alongside or instead of PowerShell for Linux scenarios, especially for manual mounting and troubleshooting.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows instructions/examples are given equal prominence, or alternate which comes first.
  • Include Linux-native troubleshooting commands (e.g., 'mount', 'dmesg', 'journalctl') and log file locations, not just Windows RDP and log file paths.
  • Reference Linux-specific documentation and tools (such as mount.cifs, mount.nfs, systemd unit files) where appropriate.
  • Clarify when PowerShell is required on Linux, and offer alternatives for users who prefer bash or other shells.
  • Ensure that all code snippets and workflows are equally detailed for both platforms, avoiding extra detail or explanation for Windows-only tools.