79
Total Pages
30
Linux-Friendly Pages
49
Pages with Bias
62.0%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

231 issues found
Showing 26-50 of 231 flagged pages
Databox Preserving file ACLs, attributes, and timestamps with Azure Data Box ...in/articles/databox/data-box-file-acls-preservation.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows terminology, tools, and privileges (such as SeBackupPrivilege, Administrator/SYSTEM accounts, and Windows NT ACLs) throughout the explanation of ACL transfer. Linux is mentioned only in contrast or as a limitation (e.g., only Windows NT ACLs are transferred with Linux clients, default ACLs aren't transferred in Linux), and there are no Linux-specific examples or guidance. The documentation lacks parity in describing Linux tools, patterns, or privileges for ACL preservation.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux examples for copying data with ACLs, such as using smbclient, rsync with --perms/--acls, or cifs-utils.
  • Clarify what 'Windows NT ACLs' means for Linux users and how Linux ACLs map (or do not map) to Azure Files.
  • Describe Linux-specific limitations and possible workarounds for ACL transfer, including any tools or scripts that can help preserve metadata.
  • List Linux user/group mapping behavior and how Linux permissions are handled when transferring to Azure Files.
  • Include guidance for Linux administrators on how to verify ACL preservation after transfer.
Databox Tutorial: Copy from VHDs to managed disks ...s/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-from-vhds.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows/SMB connection steps and tools (e.g., 'net use', File Explorer) first and in greater detail, including screenshots and step-by-step instructions. Windows-specific commands and UI interactions are highlighted, while Linux/NFS instructions are presented later, with less detail and fewer examples. There are no Linux-specific copy commands (e.g., 'cp', 'rsync') or troubleshooting tips, and the overall flow assumes familiarity with Windows tools and patterns.
Recommendations
  • Present SMB and NFS connection instructions in parallel or alternate the order to avoid always listing Windows first.
  • Provide Linux-specific copy command examples (e.g., 'cp', 'rsync') for copying VHDs after mounting the NFS share.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and screenshots for Linux hosts, similar to those provided for Windows.
  • Mention Linux file managers (e.g., Nautilus, Dolphin) for browsing mounted NFS shares, analogous to File Explorer on Windows.
  • Clarify prerequisites for both Windows and Linux environments, including required packages and permissions.
  • Ensure parity in detail and clarity between Windows and Linux instructions throughout the documentation.
Databox Tutorial: Copy data to Azure Data Box Blob storage via REST APIs ...es/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas: Windows-specific instructions (PowerShell and Server UI) for certificate import are presented first and in greater detail, with Linux instructions given less prominence and detail. Windows command-line examples (AzCopy) are provided alongside Linux, but Windows UI tools (Storage Explorer) are described in a way that assumes familiarity with Windows conventions. The documentation references Windows tools and patterns before Linux equivalents, and troubleshooting guidance is not platform-specific.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel or alternate order, rather than always listing Windows first.
  • Expand Linux instructions for certificate import with more detailed, step-by-step guidance and screenshots, similar to the Windows section.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and guidance for both Windows and Linux platforms.
  • Clarify when tools (like Storage Explorer) are cross-platform, and provide usage notes for Linux/macOS.
  • Where possible, provide examples for macOS as well, or clarify platform support.
  • Ensure that all command-line examples (AzCopy) are equally detailed for both platforms, and explain any differences in syntax or behavior.
Databox Troubleshoot share connection failure during data copy to Azure Data Box | Microsoft Docs ...articles/databox/data-box-troubleshoot-share-access.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page is heavily biased towards Windows environments. All troubleshooting steps, error messages, and examples use Windows tools (net use, Event Viewer, Local Security Policy, Registry Editor). There are no Linux or macOS equivalents provided for connecting to SMB shares, checking logs, or modifying authentication settings. The page assumes the reader is using Windows, omitting guidance for users on other platforms.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux and macOS SMB connection examples (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, Finder).
  • Include troubleshooting steps for Linux (e.g., checking syslog, dmesg, or Samba logs for authentication failures).
  • Describe how to modify SMB authentication settings on Linux (e.g., via smb.conf) and macOS.
  • Mention cross-platform differences in error messages and lockout behavior.
  • Provide parity in screenshots and UI guidance for non-Windows platforms where applicable.
Databox Tutorial: Copy data to Azure Data Box Heavy via data copy service ...ox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing SMB paths and Windows-style UNC paths (\\Server\Share), and by describing username formats and folder permissions using Windows conventions (e.g., right-click, Properties, Security tab). There are no Linux-specific examples, instructions, or references to Linux tools or workflows for connecting to NAS devices or managing shares. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows environments and omits guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific examples for SMB paths (e.g., smb://server/share or mount -t cifs ...).
  • Describe how to provide credentials and access permissions from Linux systems (e.g., using mount options, chown/chmod, or smbclient).
  • Add instructions for verifying file permissions and share access on Linux, such as using ls, getfacl, or other relevant commands.
  • Reference Linux tools (e.g., smbclient, cifs-utils) alongside Windows tools for connecting to NAS devices.
  • Clarify that the data copy service supports SMB shares from both Windows and Linux servers, and provide troubleshooting tips for common Linux SMB configurations.
Databox Tutorial to copy data via SMB on Azure Data Box Heavy | Microsoft Docs ...in/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: Windows instructions and tools (such as Robocopy and net use) are presented first and in greater detail, with extensive command and output examples. Linux instructions are minimal, lacking detailed examples for mounting SMB shares and copying data (no rsync or cp sample commands). Windows-specific tools (Robocopy, File Explorer, Notepad) are referenced exclusively, with no mention of Linux equivalents. The copy optimization section is entirely focused on Robocopy parameters and sessions, with no Linux alternatives or performance guidance.
Recommendations
  • Provide detailed Linux SMB mounting instructions, including sample mount commands with correct SMB versions and authentication options.
  • Include Linux file copy tool examples (e.g., rsync, cp, smbclient) with sample commands and output.
  • Offer performance optimization guidance for Linux, such as recommended rsync flags, parallelization strategies, or alternatives to Robocopy.
  • Add troubleshooting steps and error log viewing instructions for Linux users, referencing common Linux text editors (e.g., nano, vim, less) instead of Notepad.
  • Present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel sections or tables, ensuring equal detail and prominence.
  • Reference cross-platform tools (e.g., AzCopy) where possible, and clarify their usage on Linux.
Databox Send data to Hot, Cool, and Archive blob tier via Azure Data Box, Data Box Next-Gen, and Azure Data Box Heavy ...main/articles/databox/data-box-how-to-set-data-tier.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a clear Windows bias by exclusively providing Windows PowerShell examples for scripting blob tier changes, referencing elevated Windows PowerShell sessions, and showing sample outputs from Windows environments. There are no Linux or cross-platform CLI examples, nor are alternative tools (such as Azure CLI or REST API) mentioned. The instructions and screenshots are tailored to Windows users, making it less accessible for Linux or macOS administrators.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent examples using Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and works on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Include REST API or SDK (Python, .NET, etc.) sample code for blob tiering to support automation from any OS.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure PowerShell is available on Linux and macOS, and provide instructions for those platforms.
  • Show sample command outputs from non-Windows environments (e.g., bash shell) to illustrate parity.
  • Rephrase steps to avoid Windows-specific terminology (e.g., 'elevated Windows PowerShell session') and use more generic language.
  • Add a section comparing scripting options for blob tiering across platforms, helping users choose the best tool for their environment.
Databox Track and log Azure Data Box, Data Box Next Gen, and Azure Data Box Heavy events for import order | Microsoft Docs ...azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways. Audit log examples and terminology are Windows-centric (e.g., NT AUTHORITY, Winlogon.exe, MICROSOFT_AUTHENTICATION_PACKAGE_V1_0), and log samples use Windows-style paths (e.g., \folder\file). There is no mention of Linux-specific audit log formats, tools, or examples, nor are Linux command-line or syslog equivalents provided. The documentation does not reference Linux-native utilities or provide parity for Linux users in tracking, logging, or troubleshooting Data Box events.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific audit log examples, such as syslog entries or authentication logs from Linux systems accessing Data Box via NFS/Samba.
  • Provide Linux command-line examples for accessing logs, verifying BOM files, and troubleshooting (e.g., using grep, tail, or journalctl).
  • Reference Linux-native tools (e.g., smbclient, nfsstat, md5sum/crc64 utilities) alongside Windows tools.
  • Use platform-neutral path formats or clarify path conventions for both Windows and Linux.
  • Add troubleshooting steps and log interpretation guidance for Linux environments.
  • Ensure that any scripts or sample code (such as CRC checksum tools) are available and documented for Linux/Unix shells as well as Windows/PowerShell.
Databox Review copy errors in uploads from Azure Data Box, Data Box Next-Gen, and Azure Data Box Heavy devices .../articles/databox/data-box-troubleshoot-data-upload.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias primarily through its exclusive use of Azure portal screenshots and references to Azure PowerShell for troubleshooting and recovery steps. There are no examples or instructions for Linux users, such as using Azure CLI, Bash scripts, or Linux-native tools. Recovery steps for key vaults and other resources reference PowerShell, with no mention of Linux alternatives. The troubleshooting workflow and error resolution guidance are tailored to Windows-centric tools and patterns, leaving Linux users without parity in instructions or examples.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI commands and Bash script examples alongside PowerShell instructions for all recovery and troubleshooting steps.
  • Include screenshots or guidance for using the Azure portal from Linux environments, or clarify that the portal is cross-platform.
  • Explicitly mention Linux-compatible tools and workflows (e.g., azcopy, Azure CLI) in troubleshooting and error resolution sections.
  • Provide parity in documentation by listing Linux steps before or alongside Windows steps, rather than only referencing Windows tools.
  • Ensure that all links to further troubleshooting (such as key vault recovery) include both PowerShell and CLI/Bash options.
Databox Tutorial to copy data via SMB on Azure Data Box Heavy | Microsoft Docs ...in/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows connection and copy instructions first, providing detailed examples using Windows-specific tools (such as Robocopy and net use), and showing command outputs from Windows environments. Linux instructions are less detailed, with only a basic mount command and no comprehensive file copy example (e.g., using rsync or cp). The documentation also references Windows UI elements and troubleshooting steps (e.g., Notepad, File Explorer) without Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel, or alternate which platform is shown first.
  • Provide equally detailed Linux examples for connecting to SMB shares (e.g., using smbclient or mount.cifs) and for copying data (e.g., using rsync, cp, or smbclient).
  • Include sample command outputs and troubleshooting steps for Linux environments (e.g., viewing error logs with less, tail, or cat).
  • Reference Linux file copy tools and their recommended parameters for performance optimization, similar to the Robocopy section.
  • Mention Linux GUI tools (e.g., Nautilus, Dolphin) for browsing SMB shares, if applicable.
  • Avoid using Windows-specific terminology (e.g., Notepad, File Explorer) without providing Linux alternatives.
Databox Tutorial to unpack, connect to, unlock Azure Data Box Disk| Microsoft Docs ...b/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-set-up.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows tools and patterns (such as PowerShell and .exe utilities) are presented first and in more detail, with Windows-specific instructions and screenshots preceding Linux equivalents in several sections. The Windows unlock process is described with explicit PowerShell/Command Prompt examples and screenshots, while Linux instructions, though present, often require additional external utilities (e.g., SEDUtil, dislocker) and reference less integrated workflows. Some sections (such as troubleshooting and validation) mention Windows as the default validation platform. The page also refers to Windows tools by name and download link before Linux equivalents, and occasionally omits Linux-specific troubleshooting or validation examples.
Recommendations
  • Ensure Linux instructions and examples are presented with equal prominence and detail as Windows, including screenshots and step-by-step guidance.
  • Present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel or side-by-side tabbed sections, rather than listing Windows first.
  • Include Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and validation workflows, not just references to Windows validation.
  • Where possible, recommend or provide integrated Linux utilities (rather than relying on external, community-managed tools) for parity with Windows tooling.
  • Review and update all example commands to ensure Linux users have clear, tested, and complete instructions, including for less common distributions.
  • Add explicit links to Linux tool downloads and documentation at the same locations and with the same prominence as Windows links.
  • Avoid language that implies Windows is the default or preferred platform (e.g., 'connect to a Windows-based machine to validate').
Databox Preserving file ACLs, attributes, and timestamps with Azure Data Box ...in/articles/databox/data-box-file-acls-preservation.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows terminology, tools, and behaviors. Windows-specific concepts (such as NT ACLs, SeBackupPrivilege, and default ACLs) are explained in detail, while Linux equivalents are either omitted or described only in relation to Windows features. Linux examples, tools, and patterns for preserving ACLs and metadata are missing, and the documentation repeatedly notes limitations for Linux clients without offering guidance or alternatives.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux copy tool examples (e.g., smbclient, rsync, cp) and instructions for preserving ACLs and metadata.
  • Clarify what metadata and ACLs are preserved when using Linux clients, and describe any Linux-specific limitations or workarounds.
  • Include Linux terminology and patterns (e.g., POSIX ACLs, setfacl/getfacl) alongside Windows concepts.
  • Offer troubleshooting steps and best practices for Linux users, especially when ACLs or attributes are not preserved.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows are treated equally, rather than Windows-first.
Databox Azure Data Box Disk limits | Microsoft Docs ...ocs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-limits.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page displays Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific tools (DataBoxDiskSplitCopy.exe, DataBoxDiskValidation.cmd) and providing instructions only for enabling long paths on Windows clients. There are no equivalent examples, instructions, or tool references for Linux or macOS environments, nor is there guidance for handling long paths or validation on non-Windows systems.
Recommendations
  • Provide examples and instructions for Linux and macOS clients, including how to handle long file paths and validate uploads.
  • Mention or offer equivalent Linux tools or scripts for data copy and validation, or clarify cross-platform compatibility of existing tools.
  • Include guidance for enabling long paths or handling path limitations on Linux/macOS, if applicable.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting steps and error handling for non-Windows environments.
Databox Audit logs for Azure Data Box, Azure Data Box Next Gen, and Azure Data Box Heavy events | Microsoft Docs ...docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-audit-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. It repeatedly states that Data Box is a Windows-based device, and all examples, event providers, and log sources are Windows-centric (e.g., Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-General, BitLocker, PowerShell). There are no references to Linux equivalents, Linux-based logging, or cross-platform audit log handling. The only tool mentioned for remote management is PowerShell, with no mention of SSH or Linux-native tools.
Recommendations
  • Clarify whether Data Box supports any Linux-based operations or logging, and if so, document those paths.
  • Add examples or notes for Linux users, such as how to access logs if the device is connected to a Linux system, or how to interact with the device using Linux tools (e.g., SSH, syslog).
  • If PowerShell is the only supported remote management tool, explicitly state this and provide guidance for Linux users (e.g., using PowerShell Core on Linux, or alternatives).
  • Include a section comparing Windows and Linux audit log handling, even if only to clarify that Data Box is Windows-only, to set expectations for cross-platform users.
  • Mention any limitations or workarounds for Linux users who may need to interact with Data Box devices.
Databox Tutorial: Copy from VHDs to managed disks ...rticles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-from-vhds.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows/SMB connection instructions and examples first, with detailed steps using Windows tools (net use, File Explorer, Windows + R). The Linux/NFS instructions are provided after the Windows section and are less detailed, lacking troubleshooting steps and GUI examples. There are no Linux-specific copy command examples (e.g., using cp, rsync), and the troubleshooting/log review steps are illustrated only with Windows screenshots.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux/NFS instructions alongside or before Windows/SMB instructions to avoid ordering bias.
  • Include Linux-specific examples for mounting shares (e.g., using /etc/fstab) and copying files (e.g., cp, rsync).
  • Provide Linux screenshots for mounting, browsing shares, and reviewing logs.
  • Add troubleshooting steps and error examples for Linux users, including common NFS issues.
  • Mention Linux tools (e.g., Nautilus, Konqueror) for browsing NFS shares, similar to File Explorer for Windows.
  • Ensure parity in detail and clarity between Windows and Linux instructions throughout the documentation.
Databox Use the Azure portal to manage customer-managed keys for Azure Data Box ...box/data-box-customer-managed-encryption-key-portal.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell commands (e.g., Get-AzKeyVault) for command-line operations and recovery steps, while omitting equivalent Azure CLI or Bash examples. Troubleshooting and recovery links default to PowerShell tabs, and no Linux-specific instructions or screenshots are provided. The overall workflow is centered around the Azure portal, which is cross-platform, but command-line guidance and error resolution are Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Add Azure CLI and Bash examples alongside PowerShell commands for all command-line instructions, especially for key vault management and recovery.
  • Ensure troubleshooting links and code samples include both PowerShell and Azure CLI/Bash tabs, with Linux parity in instructions.
  • Reference Linux tools and workflows where relevant, such as using az CLI in Bash or shell scripts.
  • Include screenshots or notes indicating that the Azure portal is accessible from any OS, and clarify any OS-specific steps if present.
  • Review error messages and resolutions to ensure they do not assume the use of Windows or PowerShell, and provide alternatives for Linux/macOS users.
Databox Tutorial: Use data copy service to copy to your device .../databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by focusing on SMB protocol (primarily Windows-centric), referencing Windows-style paths (\\ServerName\ShareName), and describing user credentials in Windows domain format. There is a note explicitly stating that non-Windows NAS devices are not officially supported, and no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or tools are provided. The documentation does not mention Linux equivalents (such as NFS), nor does it provide guidance for Linux users or environments.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit support statements and instructions for Linux NAS devices, if possible.
  • Provide Linux-specific examples, such as NFS paths or Linux SMB mounting instructions.
  • Include Linux command-line examples for copying data (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or rsync).
  • Clarify compatibility and limitations for Linux hosts and NAS devices.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting and error log access instructions for Linux environments.
Databox Tutorial: Copy to Blob storage via REST APIs ...articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. In certificate import instructions, Windows PowerShell and Windows Server UI methods are described in detail and presented before Linux methods. The Linux section is brief and refers users to external documentation for specifics. AzCopy usage examples are provided for both Windows and Linux, but Windows command-line patterns (e.g., PowerShell, Windows Server UI) are more thoroughly explained. GUI tools like Storage Explorer are described in a platform-neutral way, but overall, Windows-centric tools and workflows are emphasized or presented first.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux instructions alongside Windows instructions, not after them, and with equal detail.
  • Provide explicit Linux command-line examples for certificate import for major distributions (e.g., Ubuntu, RHEL, CentOS, Fedora), including troubleshooting tips.
  • Include Linux-specific screenshots or terminal output where Windows UI screenshots are shown.
  • When referencing tools (e.g., AzCopy), clarify platform differences and provide parity in example depth.
  • Avoid referring users to external Linux documentation for basic steps; instead, include those steps directly.
  • Consider a 'platform-neutral' section first, then platform-specific details, or alternate the order between Windows and Linux in different sections.
Databox Tutorial to copy data via SMB on Azure Data Box | Microsoft Docs ...lob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: Windows connection and copy steps are presented first and in greater detail, with explicit command-line and GUI instructions. The main file copy tool recommended is Robocopy, a Windows-specific utility, with no equivalent Linux tool (such as rsync or cp) given for SMB data copy. Linux instructions are minimal, limited to a single mount command, and lack detailed examples for copying data, error handling, or performance optimization.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-first or parallel instructions for connecting and copying data via SMB, including detailed examples using common Linux tools (e.g., rsync, cp, smbclient).
  • Include performance optimization guidance for Linux file copy operations, analogous to the Robocopy session/thread recommendations.
  • Offer sample Linux command outputs and troubleshooting steps, similar to the Robocopy output and error notification sections.
  • List both Windows and Linux tools for SMB file copy in the main tutorial, and avoid presenting Windows tools exclusively or first.
  • Reference Linux documentation and best practices for SMB data transfer, including preserving file attributes and handling errors.
Databox Tutorial to copy data via SMB from your Azure Data Box | Microsoft Docs ...n/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-export-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows connection and copy instructions first and in greater detail, including explicit command-line and GUI steps. Windows-specific tools (e.g., Robocopy) are mentioned exclusively for data copy, with no Linux equivalents or examples provided. The Linux section is brief, only showing a mount command (which incorrectly uses NFS instead of SMB), and lacks guidance on Linux-compatible copy tools or workflows.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, or alternate which platform is shown first.
  • Provide detailed Linux connection steps using SMB (e.g., mount -t cifs), correcting the protocol in the example.
  • Include Linux file copy tool examples (e.g., rsync, cp, smbclient) and usage instructions.
  • Mention Linux GUI options (e.g., Nautilus, Dolphin) for accessing SMB shares.
  • Reference Linux documentation or community resources for troubleshooting and advanced usage.
  • Ensure parity in screenshots and step-by-step guidance for both platforms.
Databox Tutorial to order Azure Data Box | Microsoft Docs .../blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-ordered.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a clear Windows bias. Windows PowerShell is referenced as the primary shell for running Azure CLI commands, and all CLI and PowerShell command examples are shown with Windows-style prompts (e.g., 'PS C:\Windows>'). There is no mention or example of running commands from a Linux or macOS terminal, nor are there any bash/zsh-specific instructions or screenshots. Installation instructions and prerequisites focus on Windows tools (e.g., MSI installer, Windows PowerShell), and there are no Linux-specific installation or usage notes. The documentation assumes a Windows environment throughout, omitting Linux/macOS parity.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux/macOS installation instructions for Azure CLI and PowerShell, including package manager commands (e.g., apt, yum, brew).
  • Include CLI examples using bash/zsh shell prompts (e.g., '$ az login'), and clarify that Azure CLI commands work cross-platform.
  • Show sample outputs from Linux/macOS terminals as well as Windows.
  • Avoid language such as 'Open up a Windows PowerShell command window' when describing generic CLI usage; instead, use neutral terms like 'Open a terminal'.
  • Mention that Azure CLI and PowerShell Core are available on Linux and macOS, and link to relevant installation guides.
  • If possible, add a 'Linux/macOS' tab or section parallel to 'PowerShell' and 'Azure CLI' to demonstrate parity and inclusivity.
Databox Azure Data Box Disk troubleshooting disk unlocking issues | Microsoft Docs .../articles/databox/data-box-disk-troubleshoot-unlock.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All troubleshooting examples and error resolutions reference Windows-specific tools (such as BitLocker and PowerShell), and the Data Box Disk Unlock tool usage is only described in the context of Windows. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or troubleshooting steps, nor is there any mention of Linux-compatible unlock workflows or requirements.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit instructions and troubleshooting steps for unlocking Data Box Disks on Linux clients, including supported distributions and required dependencies.
  • Provide Linux command-line examples for using the Data Box Disk Unlock tool, if available, or clarify platform support.
  • Mention Linux equivalents for Windows tools (e.g., alternatives to BitLocker, PowerShell) or note if certain features are Windows-only.
  • Clearly state platform limitations and provide parity where possible, ensuring Linux users are not excluded from the documentation.
  • Include troubleshooting scenarios and error messages specific to Linux environments.
Databox Tutorial to copy data to Azure Data Box Disk | Microsoft Docs ...ain/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. All file copy and validation examples use Windows tools (Robocopy, DataBoxDiskSplitCopy.exe, DataBoxDiskValidation.cmd), with detailed command-line and output samples for Windows only. The Split Copy and Validation tools are explicitly stated to be available only for Windows. Linux is mentioned only in passing, with no equivalent examples, tools, or recommended commands for Linux users. The primary copy method (Robocopy) is Windows-specific, and File Explorer drag-and-drop is referenced, further centering Windows workflows.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux examples for copying data, such as using rsync, cp, or smbclient, with sample commands and output.
  • List Linux-compatible tools for checksum validation (e.g., sha256sum, md5sum) and provide step-by-step instructions for verifying data integrity on Linux.
  • Explicitly mention and demonstrate how to mount Data Box Disk on Linux, including any required SMB options or troubleshooting tips.
  • If DataBoxDiskSplitCopy and DataBoxDiskValidation are unavailable on Linux, suggest open-source or cross-platform alternatives, or provide scripts that replicate their functionality.
  • Ensure all procedures (copy, validation, troubleshooting) have Linux parity, with commands, screenshots, and error handling guidance.
  • Avoid presenting Windows tools and workflows first or exclusively; structure documentation so that Linux and Windows are treated equally.
Databox Microsoft Azure Data Box Disk system requirements| Microsoft Docs .../articles/databox/data-box-disk-system-requirements.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by listing Windows operating systems and tools before Linux equivalents, providing detailed requirements for Windows (PowerShell, .NET, BitLocker) while Linux requirements are less detailed and lack usage examples. Windows-specific tools are mentioned explicitly, and there are no Linux command-line examples or step-by-step instructions for Linux users. The documentation also assumes familiarity with Windows patterns and omits parity in Linux guidance.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-first or parallel examples for all operations, especially for disk unlocking and data copy.
  • Include step-by-step Linux command-line instructions (e.g., using dislocker, NTFS-3g, sedutil-cli) similar to the Windows PowerShell examples.
  • List Linux required software and dependencies with equal detail as Windows, including installation and usage notes.
  • Mention Linux tools and patterns before or alongside Windows equivalents to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • Add troubleshooting and validation steps for Linux environments, not just Windows.
  • Ensure that all tables and lists present Linux and Windows options with equal prominence and clarity.
Databox Track and log Azure Data Box, Azure Data Box Next Gen, and Azure Data Box Heavy events for export order| Microsoft Docs ...ocs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-export-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., Windows account names, NT AUTHORITY, WIN-DATABOXADMIN, and NTLM authentication), providing log samples with Windows-centric terminology, and omitting Linux-specific instructions or examples. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, nor is there guidance for Linux users on accessing logs or interpreting audit events. The documentation implicitly assumes a Windows environment for device access and log interpretation.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific instructions and examples for accessing Data Box logs, including sample logins, file paths, and audit events.
  • Include cross-platform command-line examples (e.g., Bash, PowerShell, CLI) for downloading and interpreting logs.
  • Clarify how authentication and access control differ on Linux systems (e.g., NFS, SMB mounts, Linux account names) and provide relevant audit log samples.
  • Mention Linux tools (such as grep, awk, or journalctl) for log analysis and verification.
  • Ensure screenshots and sample outputs include both Windows and Linux scenarios where applicable.