79
Total Pages
30
Linux-Friendly Pages
49
Pages with Bias
62.0%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

231 issues found
Showing 51-75 of 231 flagged pages
Databox Tutorial: Copy from VHDs to managed disks ...s/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-from-vhds.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows/SMB connection instructions first, using Windows-specific tools and commands (e.g., 'net use', File Explorer), and providing detailed step-by-step guidance for Windows users. Linux/NFS instructions are present but less detailed and appear after the Windows section. There is a heavier emphasis on Windows workflows and tools, with more screenshots and explicit instructions for Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Alternate the order of Windows and Linux instructions or present both side-by-side to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • Provide equally detailed, step-by-step instructions for Linux/NFS users, including screenshots of typical Linux workflows (e.g., mounting via terminal, browsing shares via Nautilus or other file managers).
  • Include Linux command-line equivalents for all Windows commands (e.g., show how to list mounted shares, disconnect/unmount shares, etc.).
  • Mention Linux tools (such as GNOME Files, Dolphin, or CLI utilities) for accessing SMB shares, not just Windows File Explorer.
  • Add troubleshooting tips and error message examples for Linux users, similar to those provided for Windows.
  • Ensure parity in the depth and clarity of instructions for both platforms throughout the documentation.
Databox Tutorial: Copy data to Azure Data Box Blob storage via REST APIs ...es/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas: certificate import instructions are presented with detailed Windows PowerShell and UI steps before Linux methods, Windows-specific tools and terminology (PowerShell, Windows Server UI) are described in detail, and Windows AzCopy examples are given alongside Linux but often with more context. Some Linux instructions are less detailed or refer users to external documentation. The use of Windows tools and patterns is more prominent and described first, while Linux equivalents are sometimes less emphasized.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, or alternate which platform is described first in each section.
  • Provide equally detailed, step-by-step instructions for Linux certificate import, including common distributions (Ubuntu, RHEL, CentOS, Fedora) and their respective commands.
  • Include screenshots for Linux certificate import steps, similar to those provided for Windows.
  • Expand Linux AzCopy usage examples to match the detail given for Windows, including explanation of parameters and troubleshooting.
  • Reference Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and common issues, not just generic or Windows-centric guidance.
  • Avoid referring users to external documentation for Linux steps unless the same is done for Windows; strive for parity in in-page guidance.
Databox Tutorial: Copy data to Azure Data Box Heavy via data copy service ...ox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing SMB paths in Windows UNC format (\\Server\Share), using Windows-style username formats, and describing file permissions via Windows GUI actions (right-click, Properties, Security tab). There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or references to Linux SMB mounting, nor are Linux command-line tools or patterns mentioned. The regular expression reference links to .NET documentation, which is more Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific instructions and examples for connecting to SMB shares, such as using the 'mount -t cifs' command.
  • Include Linux username and authentication formats, and describe how to set permissions on Linux NAS devices.
  • Provide parity in troubleshooting steps for Linux environments, such as log file locations and validation commands.
  • Reference POSIX or cross-platform regular expression documentation, not just .NET.
  • Clarify that the data copy service supports both Windows and Linux NAS sources, and explicitly mention any limitations or differences.
Databox Send data to Hot, Cool, and Archive blob tier via Azure Data Box, Data Box Next-Gen, and Azure Data Box Heavy ...main/articles/databox/data-box-how-to-set-data-tier.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. All scripting examples are provided exclusively using Windows PowerShell, with explicit instructions to open an elevated Windows PowerShell session and references to Windows-specific paths (e.g., C:\WINDOWS\system32). There are no equivalent examples for Linux or macOS users, nor any mention of cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI or REST API. The documentation assumes the user is on Windows and familiar with PowerShell, omitting guidance for users on other operating systems.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent examples using Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and works on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Include REST API or SDK (e.g., Python, .NET, Java) examples for blob tiering to support automation on any OS.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure PowerShell can be installed and used on Linux/macOS, and provide instructions or links.
  • Remove or generalize references to Windows-specific paths and environments in sample outputs.
  • Add a section or note for Linux/macOS users, outlining how to perform the same operations in their environments.
Databox Track and log Azure Data Box, Data Box Next Gen, and Azure Data Box Heavy events for import order | Microsoft Docs ...azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias primarily through its use of Windows-centric terminology, log samples, and audit log formats. Audit log examples reference Windows accounts and NT AUTHORITY domains, and use Windows-style event log formats. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, nor are Linux-specific tools or patterns mentioned for tracking, logging, or auditing. The documentation does not provide parity for Linux users in terms of examples or troubleshooting steps, and Windows terminology appears first and exclusively in several sections.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific examples for accessing logs, such as using shell commands (e.g., grep, tail, cat) to parse log files.
  • Provide audit log samples that demonstrate Linux authentication events, such as those generated by syslog or auditd, alongside Windows event log samples.
  • Mention Linux-compatible tools for checksum verification (e.g., sha256sum, crc64 utilities) and provide usage examples.
  • Clarify whether Data Box logs and manifests are accessible and interpretable on Linux systems, and provide instructions for doing so.
  • Ensure troubleshooting guides reference both SMB and NFS usage from Linux clients, including common errors and resolutions.
  • Add explicit notes or sections for Linux administrators, including best practices for tracking and auditing Data Box events in non-Windows environments.
Databox Microsoft Azure Data Box overview | Microsoft Docs in data ...e-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure Data Box demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: Windows-centric tools (e.g., SharePoint Migration Tool, Azure File Sync) are mentioned first or exclusively, and there are no explicit Linux or cross-platform examples for device setup, data copy, or workflow steps. The workflow and ingestion sections focus on Windows-based scenarios and tools, with little to no mention of Linux equivalents or guidance for Linux administrators.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux workflow examples for mounting SMB shares, copying data, and device setup (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, rsync, etc.).
  • Include references to Linux-compatible backup and migration tools (e.g., mention how to use Data Box with Linux-based backup solutions, or provide links to relevant guides).
  • Ensure parity in instructions for both Windows and Linux environments, such as step-by-step guides for both OS types in the workflow and ingestion sections.
  • Highlight cross-platform compatibility of Data Box and clarify any OS-specific limitations or requirements.
  • Mention open-source or third-party Linux tools that can be used with Data Box, and provide example commands or scripts.
Databox Review copy errors in uploads from Azure Data Box, Data Box Next-Gen, and Azure Data Box Heavy devices .../articles/databox/data-box-troubleshoot-data-upload.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by referencing Azure PowerShell for key vault recovery and omitting equivalent Linux or cross-platform CLI instructions. There are no examples or troubleshooting steps using Linux tools, Bash, or Azure CLI, and all referenced tooling and examples implicitly assume a Windows environment. This may hinder Linux users or those using non-Windows platforms from following troubleshooting steps effectively.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI commands for all PowerShell-based instructions, especially for key vault recovery and management.
  • Include Linux/Bash examples or references where file operations, troubleshooting, or scripting are discussed.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility for all steps, and clarify when a tool or command works on both Windows and Linux.
  • Add troubleshooting guidance for common Linux errors and workflows, such as using Bash scripts or Linux-native file tools.
  • Ensure screenshots and UI descriptions do not assume a Windows environment; clarify if steps are identical on Linux/Mac.
Databox Troubleshoot share connection failure during data copy to Azure Data Box | Microsoft Docs ...articles/databox/data-box-troubleshoot-share-access.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. All troubleshooting steps, command-line examples, and screenshots are Windows-centric, using Windows tools (net use, Event Viewer, Local Security Policy, Registry Editor) and referencing Windows-specific concepts (Active Directory, Group Policy Objects). There are no Linux or macOS equivalents provided for connecting to SMB shares, checking logs, or adjusting authentication settings. The guidance assumes the reader is using a Windows host, omitting parity for Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific troubleshooting steps for SMB share connection failures, including relevant commands (e.g., smbclient, mount -t cifs) and error messages.
  • Provide Linux equivalents for reviewing SMB authentication failures, such as checking syslog, journalctl, or Samba logs (/var/log/samba/).
  • Include instructions for adjusting SMB client authentication settings on Linux (e.g., editing /etc/samba/smb.conf, using mount options like 'vers', 'sec', etc.).
  • Offer parity in screenshots and examples, showing both Windows and Linux workflows where applicable.
  • Mention macOS SMB connection steps if relevant, to further broaden platform coverage.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-audit-logs.md ...docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-audit-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. It repeatedly states that Data Box is a Windows-based device, and all log event providers and examples are exclusively Windows-centric (e.g., Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-General, BitLocker, PowerShell). There are no references to Linux tools, log formats, or access patterns, nor any Linux-specific audit log event providers or examples. The only remote management example given is PowerShell, with no mention of SSH or Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Clarify whether Data Box supports Linux-based operations or access, and if so, document corresponding audit log event providers and examples for Linux environments.
  • Include examples of accessing or interpreting audit logs using Linux tools (e.g., SSH, syslog, journalctl) if supported.
  • If remote management via PowerShell is mentioned, also describe Linux alternatives (such as SSH, SCP, or Ansible) where applicable.
  • Explicitly state any limitations or lack of support for Linux, so users are aware of platform constraints.
  • Provide parity in troubleshooting and log access instructions for both Windows and Linux users, or explain why only Windows is supported.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-system-requirements.md .../articles/databox/data-box-disk-system-requirements.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by listing Windows operating systems and tools before Linux equivalents, providing a detailed table of required Windows software (PowerShell, .NET, BitLocker, etc.) while Linux requirements are listed more briefly. Windows-specific tools and frameworks are mentioned by name, whereas Linux tools are referenced generically. There is also more version detail for Windows OS than for Linux distributions.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows operating systems in parallel, rather than listing Windows first.
  • Provide equally detailed tables for required Linux software, including package names and installation instructions.
  • Include Linux-specific usage examples and troubleshooting tips, similar to the Windows PowerShell references.
  • Ensure that Linux tools are described with the same specificity as Windows tools (e.g., mention package managers, configuration steps).
  • Add parity in version support details for Linux distributions, clarifying which versions are tested and supported.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-how-to-set-data-tier.md ...main/articles/databox/data-box-how-to-set-data-tier.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias by exclusively providing Windows PowerShell examples for scripting blob tier changes, referencing elevated Windows PowerShell sessions, and showing sample outputs from Windows environments. There are no Linux or cross-platform CLI examples, nor is there mention of Linux tools or Azure CLI alternatives. The scripting section assumes the user is on Windows and familiar with PowerShell, omitting guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent examples using Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and works on both Windows and Linux.
  • Provide sample scripts for Bash or other common Linux shells to demonstrate how to set blob tiers.
  • Include instructions for installing and using Azure CLI on Linux systems.
  • Mention that Azure PowerShell is available on Linux and macOS, and provide guidance for those platforms.
  • Balance the documentation by presenting Windows and Linux approaches side-by-side, or clearly indicate which steps are platform-specific.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-logs.md ...azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. Audit log samples and terminology are heavily Windows-centric, referencing Windows event log formats, NT AUTHORITY, and Windows account domains. The log examples use Windows-style paths (backslashes) and reference Windows-specific concepts (e.g., Winlogon.exe, NTLM, Security IDs). There is little to no mention of Linux equivalents, and no Linux-specific audit log samples, tools, or instructions are provided. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows authentication and logging, and does not offer parity for Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux audit log examples, such as syslog or auditd output, alongside Windows samples.
  • Describe how to access and interpret Data Box logs on Linux systems, including file paths and authentication details relevant to Linux.
  • Mention Linux account and authentication concepts (e.g., UID/GID, PAM, Kerberos) where relevant.
  • Provide instructions or references for using Linux tools (e.g., grep, journalctl, auditctl) to analyze Data Box logs.
  • Ensure that file path examples use both Windows (\) and Linux (/) formats, or clarify path conventions for each OS.
  • Add troubleshooting steps and recommendations specific to Linux environments, especially for SMB/NFS operations.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-troubleshoot-data-upload.md .../articles/databox/data-box-troubleshoot-data-upload.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Azure PowerShell for key vault recovery and omitting equivalent Linux or cross-platform CLI examples. There are no explicit Linux or Bash instructions, and troubleshooting steps reference Windows-centric tools and patterns (e.g., PowerShell) without mentioning alternatives like Azure CLI or Bash scripts. This may hinder Linux users from following the guidance effectively.
Recommendations
  • Provide Azure CLI (cross-platform) command examples alongside or instead of PowerShell instructions, especially for key vault recovery and management tasks.
  • Explicitly mention that troubleshooting steps can be performed on Linux, macOS, or Windows, and clarify any OS-specific requirements.
  • Include Bash script snippets or references for common tasks, such as checking file naming conventions or automating error resolution.
  • Ensure all referenced tools (e.g., Azure portal, REST API, CLI) are presented in a platform-neutral manner, or provide parity for Linux users.
  • Review screenshots and UI instructions to confirm they apply equally to Linux users (e.g., browser-based portal access).
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-customer-managed-encryption-key-portal.md ...box/data-box-customer-managed-encryption-key-portal.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell commands and tools (e.g., Get-AzKeyVault) for command-line operations, especially in troubleshooting. There are no Linux-specific examples or mentions of Linux tools (such as Bash, Azure CLI on Linux, or shell scripts). When command-line instructions are given, PowerShell is referenced first or exclusively, and no parity is provided for Linux users. The troubleshooting section and recovery steps link to PowerShell-based guides, further reinforcing the bias.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI and Bash examples for all command-line instructions, especially for tasks like retrieving the Key Vault URI.
  • When linking to recovery or troubleshooting guides, include both PowerShell and Azure CLI/Linux shell tabs or links.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed on Linux/macOS using the Azure CLI, and provide sample commands.
  • Ensure that references to tools (e.g., Get-AzKeyVault) are accompanied by Azure CLI equivalents (e.g., az keyvault show).
  • Review all troubleshooting steps to ensure Linux users are not required to use PowerShell or Windows-only tools.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-from-vhds.md ...rticles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-from-vhds.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows/SMB connection steps and examples before Linux/NFS equivalents. Windows-specific tools and workflows (e.g., 'net use' command, File Explorer, Windows + R shortcut) are described in detail, while Linux instructions are less extensive and appear later. There are no explicit Linux copy command examples (e.g., using cp, rsync), and troubleshooting/logging steps are illustrated with Windows screenshots and terminology.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux/NFS instructions alongside or before Windows/SMB steps to ensure parity.
  • Include Linux-specific copy command examples (e.g., cp, rsync, dd) with sample syntax and output.
  • Add screenshots or terminal output from Linux environments for connection, mounting, and error checking.
  • Describe troubleshooting and verification steps for Linux users, including log file locations and common errors.
  • Avoid Windows-centric terminology (e.g., File Explorer, Windows + R) or provide Linux equivalents (e.g., Nautilus, terminal commands).
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data.md ...lob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows-specific instructions and tools (such as Robocopy and net use) before Linux equivalents, providing detailed Windows command examples and screenshots, and focusing on Windows workflows. Linux instructions are minimal, with only a basic mount command shown and no detailed Linux file copy examples or tool recommendations. There is also a lack of parity in troubleshooting, performance tuning, and error handling guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-first or side-by-side examples for connecting to SMB shares, including both mount and file manager (e.g., Nautilus, Dolphin) workflows.
  • Include detailed Linux file copy tool usage (e.g., rsync, cp, smbclient) with recommended parameters for performance and integrity, similar to the Robocopy section.
  • Add Linux-specific troubleshooting steps, error messages, and screenshots for mounting and copying data.
  • Offer performance optimization guidance for Linux tools, including recommended thread/concurrency settings for rsync or smbclient.
  • Ensure parity in documentation for metadata preservation (ACLs, timestamps) using Linux tools.
  • Reference Linux documentation and community resources for SMB/NFS file operations.
  • Present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel, rather than Windows-first, to avoid implicit prioritization.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-ordered.md .../blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-ordered.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. Windows PowerShell is consistently referenced as the default or primary environment for running Azure CLI and PowerShell commands. All CLI and PowerShell command examples use Windows-style prompts (e.g., PS C:\Windows>), and instructions for installing tools (Azure CLI, PowerShell) focus on Windows-specific installers (MSI) and Windows PowerShell versions. There are no explicit examples or guidance for Linux or macOS users, such as using Bash, zsh, or Linux-native package managers. The use of Windows terminology and screenshots further reinforces this bias, while Linux equivalents are missing or only briefly mentioned as options (e.g., Azure Cloud Shell supports Bash, but all examples default to Windows PowerShell).
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux and macOS instructions for installing Azure CLI and PowerShell, including package manager commands (apt, yum, brew, etc.).
  • Include CLI and PowerShell command examples using Bash/zsh shell prompts (e.g., $ az login) alongside Windows PowerShell examples.
  • Add screenshots and walkthroughs for Linux terminal environments and macOS, not just Windows.
  • Mention and demonstrate how to use Azure CLI and PowerShell in Bash or other shells, including differences in environment setup and command syntax.
  • Ensure that all sample outputs and command prompts are shown in both Windows and Linux/macOS formats.
  • Avoid language that assumes Windows as the default platform (e.g., 'Open up a Windows PowerShell command window') and instead use neutral phrasing or provide parallel instructions for other platforms.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md .../databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing on SMB protocol (primarily used in Windows environments), referencing Windows-style paths (\\<ServerName>\<ShareName>), and providing instructions that assume Windows conventions (such as right-clicking folders for security properties). There is an explicit note that non-Windows NAS devices are not officially supported, and no Linux-specific examples, tools, or workflows are provided. The documentation does not mention Linux alternatives (such as NFS, Linux file permissions, or Linux command-line tools) and omits guidance for users operating in Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit support statements or guidance for Linux-based NAS devices, or clarify limitations.
  • Provide Linux-specific examples for file paths, user permissions, and job creation (e.g., using NFS or Linux SMB clients).
  • Include instructions for managing file security and access on Linux systems (e.g., using chmod, chown, or setfacl).
  • Reference Linux tools and commands for copying data (such as smbclient, rsync, or mount.cifs) alongside Windows equivalents.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting steps and error log access for Linux environments.
  • If Linux is not supported, provide clear alternatives or workarounds for Linux users.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md ...articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Certificate import instructions are provided in detail for Windows (PowerShell and Server UI) before Linux, with screenshots and step-by-step guidance, while Linux instructions are brief and lack visual aids. AzCopy usage examples are given for both platforms, but Windows commands are presented with more context and options. The documentation references Windows-specific tools (PowerShell, Server UI) and patterns before Linux equivalents, and troubleshooting or partner software configuration steps do not offer Linux-specific guidance or examples.
Recommendations
  • Provide equally detailed, step-by-step instructions for Linux certificate import, including screenshots for popular distributions (e.g., Ubuntu, RHEL).
  • List Linux instructions before or alongside Windows instructions to avoid 'Windows first' ordering.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and partner software configuration examples for Linux environments.
  • Expand AzCopy examples to cover common Linux shell usage scenarios (e.g., scripting, permissions).
  • Reference Linux tools and patterns (e.g., CLI utilities, desktop environments) where appropriate, not just Windows tools.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-export-copy-data.md ...n/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-export-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows connection instructions and tools (net use, File Explorer, Robocopy) first and in detail, while Linux instructions are brief and potentially inaccurate (mount -t nfs instead of cifs for SMB). Windows-specific tools like Robocopy are recommended without Linux equivalents, and Linux file copy methods are not discussed.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel or in separate, equally detailed sections.
  • Correct the Linux mount example to use 'mount -t cifs' for SMB shares, not NFS.
  • Provide Linux file copy tool examples, such as 'cp', 'rsync', or 'smbclient', with sample commands.
  • Mention Linux GUI options (e.g., GNOME Files, KDE Dolphin) for accessing SMB shares.
  • Include troubleshooting tips for both platforms, not just Windows.
  • Avoid recommending Windows-only tools (Robocopy) without Linux alternatives.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-copy-data.md ...ain/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All detailed examples and screenshots use Windows tools (File Explorer, Robocopy, Command Prompt), and the only advanced copy/validation tools (DataBoxDiskSplitCopy.exe, DataBoxDiskValidation.cmd) are Windows-only. Robocopy, a Windows-specific tool, is presented as the primary method for bulk data copy, with no equivalent Linux command-line examples (e.g., rsync, cp, smbclient). Linux is only mentioned in passing, with no practical guidance or examples for Linux users, and validation for Linux is left vague and unsupported.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux examples for copying data to Data Box Disk, using tools such as rsync, cp, or smbclient, including sample commands and output.
  • List Linux-compatible alternatives to Robocopy and explain any differences in usage or performance.
  • Offer guidance for checksum validation on Linux, such as using sha256sum, md5sum, or other standard utilities, with step-by-step instructions.
  • Clarify which Data Box Disk features and tools are available or not available on Linux, and suggest workarounds where possible.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output from Linux environments to balance the visual representation.
  • Present Windows and Linux instructions side-by-side or in parallel sections, rather than only referencing Windows tools and workflows.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-limits.md ...ocs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-limits.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific configuration (enabling long paths on Windows clients) and mentioning only Windows tools (DataBoxDiskSplitCopy.exe, DataBoxDiskValidation.cmd) for data copy validation. There are no Linux equivalents or examples provided, and troubleshooting steps are tailored to Windows environments, with no mention of how Linux users should handle long paths or validation.
Recommendations
  • Include instructions for handling long file paths on Linux clients, such as relevant kernel or filesystem settings.
  • Provide Linux-compatible tools or scripts for data validation and split copy, or document how to perform these tasks using standard Linux utilities.
  • Add Linux-specific examples for data copy operations, including command-line examples using cp, rsync, or other common Linux tools.
  • Ensure troubleshooting and error handling guidance covers both Windows and Linux scenarios.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-troubleshoot-unlock.md .../articles/databox/data-box-disk-troubleshoot-unlock.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on troubleshooting Azure Data Box Disk unlock issues in the context of Windows environments. All examples, error messages, and resolutions reference Windows tools (such as PowerShell and BitLocker), and there is no mention of Linux workflows, commands, or troubleshooting steps. The unlock tool usage and troubleshooting are described only for Windows, with no Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Add troubleshooting steps and examples for Linux clients, including how to use the Data Box Disk Unlock tool on Linux.
  • Include Linux-specific error messages and their resolutions.
  • Provide parity for command-line examples, showing both Windows (PowerShell/CMD) and Linux (bash) usage.
  • Mention any Linux dependencies or requirements for the unlock tool, such as .NET Core or Mono if applicable.
  • Clarify whether the Data Box Disk Unlock tool is supported on Linux, and if not, provide alternatives or workarounds.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-export-logs.md ...ocs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-export-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific account names and log formats (e.g., WIN-DATABOXADMIN, NT AUTHORITY), and by providing log samples that reflect Windows event log structures. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, nor are Linux tools or patterns mentioned for log access, parsing, or device interaction. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows conventions and does not offer parity for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Include examples of accessing and parsing logs using Linux tools (e.g., grep, awk, sed) and mention how Linux users can interact with Data Box devices.
  • Provide sample Linux shell commands for downloading and verifying logs, such as using curl/wget for log retrieval and sha256sum or crc64 utilities for checksum verification.
  • Clarify whether Data Box supports SMB/NFS access from Linux systems and provide instructions for mounting shares on Linux.
  • Add references to Linux account and authentication models where relevant, and explain how audit logs map to Linux user actions.
  • Ensure screenshots and instructions for the Azure portal are platform-neutral or include notes for Linux users regarding browser compatibility and access.
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-set-up.md ...b/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-set-up.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides both Windows and Linux instructions for unlocking Azure Data Box Disk, but Windows examples and tooling are often presented first, with more detailed step-by-step guidance and screenshots. Windows-specific tools (DataBoxDiskUnlock.exe) and PowerShell/Command Prompt usage are emphasized, while Linux instructions, though present, sometimes reference external utilities (SEDUtil, dislocker) and require more manual setup. In some sections, Windows steps precede Linux, and troubleshooting guidance is more detailed for Windows. There are also places where Linux instructions are less visible or require more effort to follow, and some screenshots/examples are Windows-centric.
Recommendations
  • Ensure Linux instructions are presented with equal prominence and detail as Windows, including screenshots and troubleshooting steps.
  • Where possible, provide Linux examples before or alongside Windows examples, especially in step-by-step sections.
  • Include direct links to Linux tools and dependencies, and clarify installation steps for major distributions (not just CentOS/Ubuntu).
  • Expand troubleshooting guidance for Linux clients to match the depth provided for Windows.
  • Avoid referencing Windows tools or PowerShell before Linux equivalents unless there is a technical reason.
  • Add parity in example outputs and visuals for Linux commands and utilities.
  • Consider a summary table comparing steps for both platforms for quick reference.