Databox

79
Total Pages
30
Linux-Friendly Pages
49
Pages with Bias
62.0%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

231 issues found
Showing 76-100 of 231 flagged pages
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-file-acls-preservation.md ...in/articles/databox/data-box-file-acls-preservation.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows terminology, tools, and privileges (e.g., SeBackupPrivilege, Administrator/SYSTEM accounts) and providing detailed instructions and outcomes for Windows clients. Linux clients are mentioned only in passing, with limited detail and no Linux-specific examples or guidance. Windows NT ACLs are referenced as the only ACLs transferred from Linux clients, but there is no explanation of Linux ACLs or how to handle them. There are no Linux command-line examples or parity in troubleshooting or configuration steps.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux command-line examples for copying data with ACLs, attributes, and timestamps (e.g., using smbclient, rsync, or cp with appropriate flags).
  • Clarify what happens to Linux-specific ACLs and extended attributes during transfer, and how users can verify or preserve them.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and error messages relevant to Linux environments.
  • Discuss Linux privilege requirements (e.g., root, sudo) for copying SACLs or other metadata, analogous to SeBackupPrivilege in Windows.
  • List Linux default ACLs and how they map (or do not map) to Azure Files.
  • Ensure Linux tools and patterns are mentioned with equal prominence and detail as Windows equivalents.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-from-vhds.md ...s/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-from-vhds.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows/SMB connection steps and tooling (e.g., 'net use', File Explorer) first and in greater detail, including screenshots and step-by-step instructions. The Linux/NFS section is shorter, less detailed, and lacks equivalent visual aids. Windows-specific tools and patterns (such as 'net use' and File Explorer) are mentioned and illustrated, while Linux equivalents (such as 'mount', file managers, or troubleshooting steps) are not covered as thoroughly.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/NFS connection instructions with equal detail, including screenshots of mounting shares and browsing folders in a Linux file manager.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and common errors for Linux users, similar to those provided for Windows.
  • Present both Windows and Linux instructions in parallel, rather than Windows first, to avoid implying priority.
  • Mention Linux tools (e.g., Nautilus, Dolphin, CLI commands) and provide examples for copying files, verifying mounts, and handling errors.
  • Ensure parity in visual aids and step-by-step guidance for both platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md ...es/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation shows a moderate Windows bias. Windows instructions (PowerShell and Server UI) for certificate import are presented first and in greater detail, with screenshots, while Linux instructions are brief and lack visual aids. Windows-specific tools and patterns (PowerShell, Windows Server UI) are described before Linux equivalents. AzCopy usage examples are provided for both Windows and Linux, but Windows examples are listed after Linux, which partially offsets the bias. However, the overall tone and detail favor Windows users, and some steps (like Storage Explorer usage) assume a GUI, which is more common on Windows.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, with equal detail and screenshots for both.
  • Include more comprehensive Linux examples for certificate import, including commands for multiple distributions and troubleshooting tips.
  • Add explicit instructions for using Storage Explorer on Linux, or mention CLI alternatives for Linux users.
  • Avoid presenting Windows instructions first; alternate or group by OS.
  • Ensure all tools and steps are described for both platforms, and highlight any platform-specific caveats.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data.md ...in/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows connection and copy instructions first, providing detailed examples and screenshots for Windows tools (such as Robocopy and File Explorer), and omitting equivalent Linux file copy examples (e.g., rsync, cp, smbclient). The Linux section is brief, lacks detailed step-by-step instructions, and does not offer tool recommendations or sample output. Additionally, only Windows-specific tools (Robocopy, Notepad) are discussed in depth.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux copy tool examples (e.g., rsync, cp, smbclient) with sample commands and output, similar to the Robocopy section for Windows.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output for Linux workflows, such as mounting shares and verifying copied files.
  • Present connection instructions for Windows and Linux in parallel or side-by-side, rather than Windows-first.
  • Mention and describe Linux-native troubleshooting tools (e.g., viewing error logs with less, tail, or cat) alongside Notepad.
  • Reference Linux documentation and best practices for SMB/NFS mounting and file copying, including links to official resources.
  • Clarify SMB version compatibility for Linux and provide guidance for common issues (e.g., permissions, SELinux, fstab configuration).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-local-web-ui-admin.md ...b/main/articles/databox/data-box-local-web-ui-admin.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for administering Azure Data Box via the local web UI demonstrates subtle Windows bias. Windows terminology and tools (e.g., File Explorer, SMB, Active Directory Backup Operators) are referenced exclusively or before Linux equivalents. There are no explicit Linux/NFS usage examples or references to Linux tools for tasks like browsing files or connecting to shares. Windows-centric concepts (such as Backup Operator privileges and SMB signing) are explained with links to Windows documentation, while Linux alternatives are not mentioned.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-specific examples and instructions alongside Windows ones (e.g., show how to browse/download files using Linux file managers or command-line tools).
  • Mention NFS usage and how to connect to shares from Linux systems, including credential usage and mounting commands.
  • Reference Linux equivalents for concepts like Backup Operator privileges, or clarify how these features map to Linux environments.
  • Include links to Linux documentation or community resources where relevant (e.g., NFS, ACLs, SMB signing on Linux).
  • Avoid using Windows terminology (e.g., 'File Explorer') exclusively; use cross-platform terms or provide both Windows and Linux options.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md ...ox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing SMB paths in Windows UNC format (\\Server\Share), describing username formats typical of Windows domains, and giving instructions such as 'Right-click the folder, select Properties, then Security,' which are specific to Windows Explorer. There are no examples or instructions for Linux or Unix environments, such as how to specify SMB paths, credentials, or manage permissions from a Linux system. Additionally, references to file matching patterns and regular expressions link to .NET documentation, which is more familiar to Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific examples for SMB path formats (e.g., //server/share) and credential usage.
  • Include instructions for setting permissions and accessing SMB shares from Linux (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or relevant CLI commands).
  • Provide parity in file matching pattern examples, referencing Linux shell wildcards and POSIX regular expressions.
  • Clarify that the data copy service can be used from both Windows and Linux NAS devices, and highlight any platform-specific considerations.
  • Reference Linux documentation for regular expressions and file system permissions alongside .NET/Windows resources.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-troubleshoot-share-access.md ...articles/databox/data-box-troubleshoot-share-access.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All troubleshooting steps, error messages, and examples are given exclusively for Windows environments, using Windows tools (net use, Event Viewer, Local Security Policy, Registry Editor). There are no Linux or macOS equivalents provided for connecting to SMB shares, checking logs, or adjusting authentication settings. The documentation assumes the user is operating from a Windows host, omitting guidance for Linux users who may also interact with Azure Data Box via SMB.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific troubleshooting steps for SMB share connection failures, including example commands (e.g., smbclient, mount -t cifs) and typical error messages.
  • Include instructions for reviewing SMB authentication and connection logs on Linux (e.g., using journalctl, syslog, or examining /var/log/samba/).
  • Provide guidance for adjusting SMB client configuration on Linux, such as modifying /etc/samba/smb.conf or using mount options to set protocol versions and authentication methods.
  • Mention macOS where relevant, with examples using Finder or command-line tools.
  • Ensure that all procedures and error resolutions are presented for both Windows and Linux/macOS environments, or clearly indicate platform-specific steps.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-overview.md ...e-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure Data Box shows a Windows bias by referencing Windows-centric migration scenarios (e.g., SQL Server, VM farm), mentioning Windows backup tools (Veeam, Commvault) before Linux equivalents, and omitting explicit Linux or cross-platform usage examples for device setup, data copy, and workflow steps. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or mentions of Linux tools or commands for interacting with the Data Box, despite the device supporting SMB and being usable from Linux systems.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux usage examples for mounting SMB shares, copying data, and interacting with the Data Box device (e.g., using mount.cifs, rsync, cp, etc.).
  • Include references to Linux backup and migration tools (e.g., Bacula, Amanda, native rsync, etc.) alongside Windows tools.
  • Provide step-by-step instructions for Linux users in the workflow sections, including network configuration and troubleshooting tips for Linux environments.
  • Highlight cross-platform compatibility in all relevant sections, and clarify any differences or requirements for Linux vs. Windows hosts.
  • Add links to Linux-specific guides or community resources for Data Box usage.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-security.md ...e-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-security.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page for Azure Data Box security overview demonstrates a Windows bias primarily through the exclusive recommendation of SMB 3.0 for encrypted data transfer, which is most commonly associated with Windows environments. There is no mention of Linux-specific protocols (such as NFS with Kerberos, SFTP, or rsync over SSH), nor are there examples or guidance for Linux users. The documentation also references device credentials and access patterns in the context of the Azure portal, which is platform-neutral, but omits any Linux command-line or tool references. Additionally, the secure erase tools listed (ARCCONF, MSECLI) are typically Windows-centric, with no mention of Linux equivalents or usage instructions for Linux admins.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit examples and recommendations for Linux environments, such as using NFS with Kerberos, SFTP, or rsync over SSH for encrypted data transfer.
  • Provide Linux command-line examples for accessing Data Box shares and managing credentials.
  • Document the use of secure erase tools on Linux, or provide Linux-compatible alternatives and instructions.
  • Ensure parity in protocol recommendations by listing both Windows and Linux options for data-in-flight encryption.
  • Include troubleshooting and operational guidance for Linux users alongside Windows instructions.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md .../databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation demonstrates Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-compatible SMB paths and user formats, referencing Windows-specific UI patterns (such as right-clicking folders and using the Security tab), and explicitly stating that non-Windows NAS devices are not officially supported. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or tool references, and the documentation does not address Linux SMB clients or file system permissions.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux examples for SMB path formats and user credentials, including common Linux mount commands and syntax.
  • Include instructions for managing file permissions and access control on Linux systems, such as using chmod, chown, or setfacl.
  • Clarify compatibility and limitations for Linux NAS devices, and offer troubleshooting guidance for Linux environments.
  • Reference Linux tools (e.g., smbclient, mount.cifs) alongside Windows instructions, and ensure parity in example coverage.
  • Avoid Windows-centric UI instructions (e.g., right-click, Security tab) or supplement them with Linux equivalents.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-set-up.md ...b/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-set-up.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows instructions and tool references (such as the Data Box Disk Unlock tool and PowerShell commands) are often presented first or in greater detail, with Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., drive letters, PowerShell/Command Prompt) featured prominently. Linux instructions are present and reasonably detailed, but some sections (such as troubleshooting and validation) refer users back to Windows, and Windows tools are mentioned before their Linux equivalents. There is also a tendency to use Windows terminology and workflows as the default, with Linux as an alternative.
Recommendations
  • Ensure Linux instructions are presented with equal prominence and detail as Windows, including troubleshooting and validation steps.
  • Where possible, present Linux and Windows examples side-by-side or in parallel tabs, rather than Windows-first.
  • Avoid referring users to Windows for validation or troubleshooting when equivalent Linux methods exist; provide Linux-native solutions.
  • Expand Linux-specific tool documentation (e.g., SEDUtil, dislocker) and clarify their roles and installation steps.
  • Use neutral terminology (e.g., 'mount point' instead of 'drive letter') when describing cross-platform workflows.
  • Include explicit Linux examples for all major steps, including passkey retrieval, disk validation, and troubleshooting.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-customer-managed-encryption-key-portal.md ...box/data-box-customer-managed-encryption-key-portal.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page shows evidence of Windows bias. Troubleshooting steps and command-line references predominantly use PowerShell (e.g., Get-AzKeyVault) and do not provide equivalent Linux/bash/Azure CLI examples. The recovery instructions for deleted key vaults link to PowerShell tabs first, and there is no mention of Linux or cross-platform command-line usage except for a brief reference to Azure CLI for setting permissions. The documentation assumes use of the Azure portal and Windows-centric tooling, with no parity for Linux users or alternative command-line workflows.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI/bash examples for all PowerShell commands, especially for key vault recovery and URI retrieval.
  • Ensure troubleshooting steps include both PowerShell and Azure CLI instructions, with clear cross-platform guidance.
  • Where command-line tools are referenced, mention both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux/macOS (bash/Azure CLI) options, and avoid presenting Windows tools first unless justified.
  • Add a section or links for managing customer-managed keys using Azure CLI or REST API, suitable for Linux/macOS users.
  • Review all links to ensure they do not default to PowerShell tabs; offer CLI or bash tabs as alternatives.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-troubleshoot-unlock.md .../articles/databox/data-box-disk-troubleshoot-unlock.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page focuses almost exclusively on Windows environments for troubleshooting Azure Data Box Disk unlocking issues. All examples, error messages, and resolutions reference Windows tools (such as PowerShell and BitLocker), and there is no mention of Linux workflows, tools, or troubleshooting steps. The unlock tool usage and error handling are described only in the context of Windows, with no Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Add troubleshooting steps and examples for Linux clients, including how to run the unlock tool on Linux and handle common errors.
  • Provide equivalent Linux commands and workflows for unlocking disks, such as using cryptsetup or other disk unlocking utilities.
  • Mention Linux system requirements and dependencies for the unlock tool, if supported.
  • Include error messages and resolutions specific to Linux environments.
  • Ensure parity in documentation structure by having separate sections for both Windows and Linux clients.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md ...ox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-copy-service.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing SMB paths and Windows-style credentials, using Windows UI conventions (e.g., right-click, Properties, Security tab), and omitting any Linux-specific instructions or examples. There are no references to Linux tools, mounting procedures, or file permission management, and all examples use Windows formats and terminology.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific instructions for connecting to SMB shares (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs).
  • Provide examples of Linux file path formats and credential usage.
  • Include guidance for managing file permissions and security from Linux systems.
  • Mention Linux troubleshooting steps and tools for SMB connectivity.
  • Ensure parity in screenshots and UI walkthroughs for Linux environments where applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data.md ...lob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a clear Windows bias. Windows examples and tools (especially Robocopy and net use) are presented first and in much greater detail, with step-by-step instructions, screenshots, and sample outputs. Linux instructions are minimal, limited to a single mount command for SMB, with no examples for copying data (e.g., using cp, rsync, or smbclient), no troubleshooting, and no performance guidance. The only file copy tool discussed in detail is Robocopy, which is Windows-specific. There is no parity in Linux guidance for copying files, optimizing performance, or error handling.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux examples for all major steps, including mounting SMB shares, copying data (using cp, rsync, or smbclient), and verifying data integrity.
  • Include performance optimization guidance for Linux file copy tools (e.g., rsync options, parallelization strategies).
  • Add troubleshooting steps and sample outputs for Linux scenarios, similar to the Windows Robocopy output.
  • Mention Linux tools and workflows alongside Windows tools, not after or as an afterthought.
  • Ensure screenshots and UI guidance are not exclusively Windows-centric (e.g., show Linux file manager mounting shares).
  • Where Robocopy is recommended, suggest Linux alternatives and link to their documentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-export-copy-data.md ...n/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-export-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows connection and copy instructions first and in greater detail, including explicit command-line and GUI steps. Windows-specific tools such as 'net use' and Robocopy are mentioned and recommended, with no Linux file copy tool alternatives provided. The Linux section is brief, only showing a mount command (with a possible error, as it uses NFS instead of SMB), and lacks parity in example depth and tool recommendations.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, or alternate which is shown first.
  • Provide detailed Linux SMB mounting instructions using the correct protocol (e.g., 'mount -t cifs' for SMB, not NFS).
  • Include Linux file copy tool examples (e.g., 'cp', 'rsync', 'smbclient', 'mc') and usage instructions.
  • Mention Linux equivalents to Robocopy, such as 'rsync', and provide example commands.
  • Ensure screenshots and step-by-step instructions are available for both platforms.
  • Clarify supported SMB versions and authentication methods for Linux clients.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-nfs.md .../articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-nfs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a mild Windows bias. Windows UNC paths and conventions are presented first and in detail, with Windows-centric share naming and examples. Windows tools (Robocopy) are mentioned as the baseline for copy utilities, while Linux alternatives are described as 'similar to Robocopy.' The mounting instructions for Linux are present, but the initial share path table and examples use Windows UNC paths, and there is no explicit PowerShell or Windows command-line example for mounting, but the overall flow and terminology favor Windows. Linux instructions are present but appear after Windows-centric details, and some Linux-specific limitations are mentioned only at the end.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux NFS mount paths and examples alongside or before Windows UNC paths in tables and examples.
  • Include explicit Windows command-line (e.g., PowerShell or Command Prompt) examples for mounting shares, and ensure Linux and Mac equivalents are given equal prominence.
  • Avoid describing Linux copy tools as 'similar to Robocopy'; instead, present them as primary options for Linux environments.
  • Add a section summarizing both Windows and Linux workflows at the start, making clear that both platforms are supported equally.
  • Ensure troubleshooting and error log instructions include Linux-specific guidance, not just screenshots from Windows environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-from-vhds.md ...rticles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-from-vhds.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows/SMB connection instructions before Linux/NFS instructions, providing detailed Windows command-line and GUI steps (including 'net use' and File Explorer), and referencing Windows-specific tools and patterns. The Linux/NFS section is less detailed and lacks parity in example commands and troubleshooting guidance.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux/NFS instructions alongside or before Windows/SMB instructions to avoid ordering bias.
  • Include Linux-specific command-line examples for copying files (e.g., using cp, rsync, or dd) and troubleshooting steps.
  • Provide parity in screenshots and step-by-step guidance for Linux environments, such as using Nautilus or other Linux file managers to access NFS shares.
  • Mention cross-platform tools and approaches (e.g., using Azure CLI, REST, or third-party utilities) where applicable.
  • Ensure troubleshooting and error messages are covered for both Windows and Linux scenarios.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md ...es/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates several Windows biases. Certificate import instructions are presented with detailed Windows PowerShell and UI steps first, while Linux instructions are less detailed and grouped generically. AzCopy usage examples are provided for both Windows and Linux, but Windows command syntax is shown first in some cases. The documentation references Windows-specific tools (PowerShell, Windows Server UI) with screenshots, while Linux equivalents lack similar visual aids or step-by-step detail. There is also a general tendency to provide more comprehensive guidance for Windows users, with Linux instructions being more terse and less illustrated.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, giving equal detail and prominence to both.
  • Include screenshots or step-by-step visuals for Linux certificate import procedures, similar to those provided for Windows.
  • When listing command examples (e.g., AzCopy), alternate the order or present both side-by-side to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Expand Linux instructions to cover more distributions and provide troubleshooting tips specific to common Linux environments.
  • Reference Linux tools and patterns (e.g., command-line utilities, certificate stores) as explicitly as Windows tools.
  • Ensure that all steps (such as certificate import, connection setup) have equally detailed instructions for both platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-ordered.md .../blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-ordered.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. Windows PowerShell is consistently referenced as the default or primary environment for running Azure CLI commands, with explicit instructions and screenshots using Windows paths (e.g., PS C:\Windows>). Installation instructions and sample outputs are Windows-centric, and there is no mention or example of using Azure CLI on Linux or macOS terminals. PowerShell is treated as the main scripting environment, with no Bash or Linux shell equivalents provided for PowerShell-specific steps. The use of Windows-specific terminology and tools (e.g., MSI installers, Windows PowerShell version checks) further reinforces the bias. There are no Linux or macOS-specific examples, instructions, or screenshots, and the documentation does not acknowledge or guide users on how to perform these tasks in non-Windows environments.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit examples and instructions for running Azure CLI commands in Bash on Linux and macOS, including screenshots or sample outputs from those environments.
  • When referencing Azure CLI, avoid defaulting to Windows PowerShell; instead, present both Bash and PowerShell options side-by-side, or use neutral language.
  • Include installation instructions for Azure CLI on Linux and macOS, not just Windows (MSI installer).
  • For PowerShell-specific steps, clarify that PowerShell Core is cross-platform and provide guidance for Linux/macOS users, or offer equivalent Bash scripts where possible.
  • Replace Windows-specific paths and prompts (e.g., PS C:\Windows>) with generic or platform-appropriate alternatives, or show both.
  • Add a section or note addressing platform differences and ensuring parity for Linux/macOS users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-system-requirements.md .../articles/databox/data-box-disk-system-requirements.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by listing Windows operating systems and tools before Linux equivalents, providing more detail for Windows requirements (e.g., PowerShell, .NET Framework, BitLocker), and mentioning Windows-specific patterns and software. Linux requirements are listed after Windows, with less explanation and fewer details about installation or usage. There are no Linux command examples or troubleshooting tips, while Windows tools are named explicitly.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows requirements in parallel, rather than listing Windows first.
  • Provide equal detail for Linux tools, including installation instructions and usage examples (e.g., how to use dislocker, NTFS-3g, sedutil-cli).
  • Include troubleshooting tips and common patterns for Linux environments, similar to those provided for Windows.
  • Add Linux command-line examples for disk unlock and data copy operations.
  • Mention Linux-specific considerations (e.g., permissions, mounting disks) where relevant.
  • Ensure that any Windows-specific software (e.g., PowerShell, .NET Framework) is matched with Linux equivalents or alternatives where possible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-copy-data.md ...ain/articles/databox/data-box-disk-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All example commands use Windows tools (Robocopy, DataBoxDiskSplitCopy.exe, DataBoxDiskValidation.cmd), and instructions are written for Windows environments (e.g., File Explorer, drive letters, Command Prompt). Linux support is only briefly mentioned, with no equivalent Linux commands, tools, or workflows provided. The Split Copy and Validation tools are explicitly stated as Windows-only, and no Linux alternatives or parity guidance is offered. The use of Windows terminology and screenshots further reinforces this bias.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-specific examples for copying data (e.g., using rsync, cp, or smbclient).
  • Document Linux-compatible workflows for checksum validation (e.g., using sha256sum, md5sum, or other open-source tools).
  • List and describe any Linux-supported Data Box Disk tools, or clarify which steps can be performed on Linux and how.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output from Linux environments to illustrate parity.
  • Explicitly state any limitations for Linux users and offer workarounds or alternatives.
  • Present instructions and examples for both Windows and Linux side-by-side, or clearly separate them by platform.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-audit-logs.md ...docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-audit-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias. It repeatedly emphasizes that Data Box is a Windows-based device, and all audit log examples, event providers, and event IDs are specific to Windows (e.g., Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-General, BitLocker, PowerShell). There are no references to Linux equivalents, Linux audit tools, or non-Windows event providers. The only remote management example mentioned is PowerShell, with no mention of SSH or Linux-based management. The documentation does not provide guidance or parity for users who may want to interact with or audit Data Box from a Linux environment.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state whether Data Box supports any Linux-based management or audit tools, or clarify that it is Windows-only if that is the case.
  • If possible, provide examples of accessing logs or managing Data Box from a Linux environment (e.g., via SMB, REST API, or other cross-platform methods).
  • Mention Linux equivalents for audit log event types (e.g., syslog, auditd) and clarify interoperability or limitations.
  • Include troubleshooting steps or access instructions relevant to Linux users, such as how to mount shares or interact with the device from Linux.
  • If remote management is only possible via PowerShell, clarify this limitation and suggest alternatives or workarounds for Linux users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data.md ...in/articles/databox/data-box-heavy-deploy-copy-data.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: Windows instructions and examples (including screenshots and command-line usage) are presented first and in greater detail; Windows-specific tools like Robocopy are featured prominently with full command examples and output, while Linux alternatives are only briefly mentioned or omitted; there is a lack of parity in Linux copy tool guidance (no detailed rsync/cp examples or output); and the overall structure and depth of instructions favor Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Provide detailed Linux copy tool examples (e.g., rsync, cp) with sample commands, recommended flags, and expected output, similar to the Robocopy section.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output for Linux workflows to match the visual guidance given for Windows/File Explorer.
  • Present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel sections or tables, rather than Windows-first, to ensure equal visibility.
  • Mention and explain Linux-native SMB tools (e.g., smbclient, mount.cifs) and their usage for connecting to SMB shares.
  • Clarify any differences in error handling, logging, and troubleshooting for Linux users, including how to access and interpret error files.
  • Reference Linux documentation or community resources for advanced SMB/NFS usage, performance tuning, and troubleshooting.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Databox https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md ...articles/databox/data-box-deploy-copy-data-via-rest.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Certificate import instructions are provided in detail for Windows (PowerShell and UI) before Linux, with screenshots and step-by-step guidance, while Linux instructions are brief and generic. AzCopy usage examples are given for both platforms, but Windows examples use legacy syntax and are listed after Linux. GUI tools like Storage Explorer are described in a platform-neutral way, but overall, Windows-specific tools and procedures are more thoroughly documented.
Recommendations
  • Provide equally detailed, step-by-step instructions for importing certificates on popular Linux distributions, including screenshots or terminal output where possible.
  • List Linux and Windows procedures/examples in parallel or alternate order to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • Update AzCopy examples to use the same syntax style (preferably the cross-platform azcopy CLI) for both Windows and Linux, and clarify which syntax is recommended.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and common issues for Linux environments, matching the depth of Windows coverage.
  • Reference Linux-specific GUI tools (if any) or clarify cross-platform support for Storage Explorer.
  • Avoid language that assumes Windows as the default platform; explicitly state platform applicability for each step.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 4 of 10 Next →