Defender For IoT

190
Total Pages
177
Linux-Friendly Pages
13
Pages with Bias
6.8%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues (13)

https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/integrations/logrhythm.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation does not explicitly show Windows bias through the use of Windows-specific tools, PowerShell commands, or Windows-first ordering. However, it lacks any mention of Linux-specific instructions, tools, or examples for configuring the LogRhythm collector, which is a common scenario in cross-platform environments. The absence of Linux guidance may disadvantage Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit instructions or references for configuring LogRhythm collectors on Linux systems, including any relevant commands or configuration file locations.
  • Include examples or screenshots that demonstrate both Windows and Linux environments where applicable.
  • Clarify that the instructions are platform-agnostic if that is the case, or specify any platform-specific steps required.
  • Provide troubleshooting tips for both Windows and Linux collectors, if differences exist.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/device-builders/release-notes.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias by highlighting PowerShell commands alongside Azure CLI, and mentioning them first in the context of automating firmware analysis workflows. There are no explicit Linux shell or bash examples, and the documentation does not clarify parity or provide Linux-specific guidance where PowerShell is mentioned. However, the page does reference Linux distributions and features, and does not exclusively focus on Windows tools.
Recommendations:
  • When mentioning automation tools, always list cross-platform options (e.g., Azure CLI, Bash scripts) before or alongside PowerShell, and clarify their OS compatibility.
  • Provide explicit Linux/Bash command examples wherever PowerShell is referenced, or link to equivalent Linux documentation.
  • Clarify in the documentation which tools are cross-platform and which are Windows-specific.
  • Add a section or note on how Linux users can perform the same tasks, especially for onboarding and automation workflows.
  • Ensure that screenshots and UI references are not Windows-centric, or provide Linux equivalents if applicable.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/includes/active-monitoring-protocols.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page lists 'Windows event scans' and WMI as the only example of event scanning, with configuration instructions specifically for Windows. There are no Linux or cross-platform event scan examples, nor are Linux tools or methods mentioned. The DNS scan is generic, but the only detailed scan type is Windows-specific.
Recommendations:
  • Add examples and configuration instructions for Linux event scanning, such as using syslog, auditd, or other Linux-native monitoring tools.
  • Include Linux or cross-platform protocols and methods in the scan type table, ensuring parity with Windows.
  • If Linux event scanning is not supported, explicitly state this to avoid confusion and clarify platform limitations.
  • Reorder the table or provide both Windows and Linux examples side by side to avoid a Windows-first impression.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/best-practices/certificate-requirements.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows Explorer as the rationale for file extensions, and by not providing any Linux-specific guidance or examples. The explanations for file types (.crt, .key) are framed in terms of Windows compatibility, and there are no instructions or considerations for Linux users, such as common Linux tools or file handling patterns.
Recommendations:
  • Include Linux-specific guidance, such as referencing common Linux file browsers or command-line tools (e.g., Nautilus, ls, cat) when discussing file extensions.
  • Provide examples for both Windows and Linux environments for certificate creation, file management, and validation.
  • Clarify that the file extensions are for compatibility across both Windows and Linux, and mention how these files are typically handled or recognized in Linux.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux users, highlighting any differences or additional steps they may need to take.
  • Avoid framing file format requirements solely in terms of Windows compatibility (e.g., 'for support in Windows Explorer'), and instead use neutral language or mention both platforms.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/getting-started.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Microsoft-centric tools and workflows (Azure portal, Microsoft 365 admin center, Microsoft tenants) without mentioning or providing alternatives for Linux users or cross-platform command-line options. There are no examples or instructions for Linux environments, and the documentation assumes the user operates within the Microsoft ecosystem, which is most commonly associated with Windows.
Recommendations:
  • Include guidance or references for users accessing the Azure portal and Microsoft 365 admin center from Linux systems, such as supported browsers or CLI alternatives.
  • Provide examples or links for performing key actions (e.g., license management, plan creation) using cross-platform tools like Azure CLI or PowerShell Core, which are available on Linux.
  • Clarify any platform dependencies or limitations, and explicitly state if all steps can be completed from non-Windows operating systems.
  • Add a section addressing Linux users, outlining any differences or additional steps required for onboarding sensors or managing subscriptions from Linux environments.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/concept-sentinel-integration.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation is heavily focused on Microsoft Sentinel and Defender for IoT, both of which are Microsoft cloud-based tools. There are no explicit examples or instructions that are specific to Windows or PowerShell, but the documentation exclusively references Microsoft tools and workflows, with no mention of Linux-based alternatives, command-line examples, or cross-platform considerations. There are no Linux-specific instructions, nor is there any guidance for users who may be operating in non-Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples or references for integrating Defender for IoT and SIEM/SOAR workflows in Linux environments, such as using Linux-based log shippers or open-source SIEM tools.
  • Provide command-line examples that are cross-platform, or specify how to perform relevant tasks using Bash or Linux CLI tools where applicable.
  • Mention any platform requirements or compatibility notes, especially if certain features are only available or best supported on Windows.
  • If possible, highlight how Linux-based SOC teams can interact with Microsoft Sentinel (e.g., via REST APIs, CLI tools, or SDKs available for Linux).
  • Add documentation or links for users who may want to use non-Microsoft tools or hybrid environments, ensuring broader applicability.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/how-to-import-device-information.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation is generally platform-neutral in its main instructions, focusing on CSV file manipulation and web UI actions. However, in the 'Next steps' section, it specifically references 'Detect Windows workstations and servers with a local script' as a follow-up, without mentioning Linux or cross-platform alternatives. Additionally, downloadable example files are in Excel (.xlsx) format, which is more closely associated with Windows environments, though CSV is also supported. There are no explicit Linux examples or references to Linux tools or workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Include references to Linux or cross-platform device detection scripts in the 'Next steps' section, or clarify if such scripts are not available.
  • Provide example workflows or notes for editing CSV files using Linux-native tools (e.g., nano, vim, LibreOffice Calc) in addition to Excel.
  • If possible, offer downloadable example files in open formats (CSV only) and avoid referencing Excel-specific formats unless necessary.
  • Ensure parity in documentation by mentioning both Windows and Linux environments where relevant, especially in follow-up resources.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/networking-requirements.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page lists networking requirements for Microsoft Defender for IoT, and while it is largely platform-neutral, it does show some Windows bias. Specifically, it references WMI (Windows Management Instrumentation) and Windows Endpoint Monitoring as a monitoring method, with no equivalent mention of Linux monitoring tools or protocols. Additionally, the Windows-specific tool (WMI) is mentioned before SNMP, which is cross-platform, and there are no Linux-specific examples or references.
Recommendations:
  • Include Linux monitoring protocols and tools (e.g., SSH-based monitoring, collectd, or syslog) alongside WMI.
  • Provide examples or references for Linux endpoint monitoring, not just Windows.
  • When listing protocols, avoid putting Windows-specific tools (like WMI) before cross-platform or Linux-native options unless there is a clear reason.
  • Add a section or note on how to monitor Linux endpoints, including relevant ports and protocols.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell as a primary method for user and role assignment in Azure, and by focusing on Microsoft Entra ID and Active Directory integration, which are traditionally Windows-centric technologies. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, and Linux-native tools or workflows are not mentioned. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows tools and does not provide parity for Linux administrators.
Recommendations:
  • Include Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell for user and role management, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Mention and provide examples for managing users and roles using REST APIs or SDKs, which are platform-agnostic.
  • Clarify whether on-premises OT sensors can be managed via Linux tools or interfaces, and provide relevant instructions if available.
  • Reference LDAP integration in a more platform-neutral way, and provide examples for integrating with non-Active Directory LDAP servers (such as OpenLDAP).
  • Ensure that any diagrams or examples referencing Active Directory also mention alternatives or generic LDAP groups.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux administrators, summarizing which tools and commands are available for user management on non-Windows systems.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/ot-deploy/update-device-inventory.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by specifically recommending the use of the Defender for IoT Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) tool to enhance device data visibility for Windows-based devices, without mentioning equivalent tools or processes for Linux-based devices. There are no examples or guidance for Linux environments, and Windows tooling is mentioned exclusively and first when discussing device data enhancement.
Recommendations:
  • Include equivalent guidance and tooling for enhancing device data visibility for Linux-based devices, such as using SSH, SNMP, or Linux-native inventory scripts.
  • Provide examples or references for both Windows and Linux environments when discussing device data enhancement.
  • Rephrase enhancement recommendations to be platform-neutral, or present Windows and Linux options side by side.
  • Clarify if certain features are Windows-only, and if so, provide alternative recommendations for Linux users.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-portal.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias by providing a PowerShell example for granting group access to Azure resources, without offering equivalent examples for Linux users (e.g., Azure CLI or Bash). The PowerShell example is listed before any mention of cross-platform tools, and there are no Linux-specific instructions or references. This may make it less accessible for users managing Azure from Linux or macOS environments.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI (cross-platform) examples alongside or before PowerShell examples for managing Azure RBAC and user permissions.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI can be used on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and link to relevant documentation.
  • Wherever PowerShell is referenced, add a parallel section or note for Bash/Azure CLI usage.
  • Review all external links and ensure they include both PowerShell and CLI options, or clarify when a feature is only available in one.
  • Consider reordering examples so that cross-platform tools (Azure portal, Azure CLI) are presented before Windows-specific tools (PowerShell).
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/tutorial-cyberark.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by providing configuration steps and file paths exclusively for Windows environments (e.g., 'c:\Program Files\PrivateArk\Server\dbparam.xml'), referencing Windows-specific tools (Server Central Administration, Traffic Light controls), and omitting equivalent instructions or file paths for Linux-based CyberArk deployments. No Linux or cross-platform alternatives are mentioned, and all examples assume a Windows server environment.
Recommendations:
  • Add parallel instructions for configuring CyberArk PSM on Linux servers, including Linux file paths (e.g., '/opt/PrivateArk/Server/dbparam.xml') and service management commands (e.g., using 'systemctl' or 'service' to restart the CyberArk service).
  • Clearly indicate whether the integration is supported on both Windows and Linux CyberArk deployments. If not, state the limitation explicitly.
  • Provide screenshots or CLI commands relevant to Linux environments where applicable.
  • Use platform-agnostic language where possible, or present both Windows and Linux steps side by side.
  • Mention any differences in syslog configuration or file placement between Windows and Linux installations.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/traffic-mirroring/configure-mirror-span.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation focuses exclusively on configuring SPAN ports on Cisco switches using Cisco CLI and GUI, with no mention of Windows, Powershell, or Windows-specific tools. However, there is a notable absence of Linux-specific guidance or examples, such as how to verify mirrored traffic on a Linux-based Defender for IoT sensor or using Linux tools to validate the configuration.
Recommendations:
  • Add examples or references for verifying SPAN/mirrored traffic on Linux-based Defender for IoT sensors (e.g., using tcpdump, Wireshark, or similar tools).
  • Include troubleshooting steps or commands for both Windows and Linux environments to ensure parity.
  • Explicitly mention that Defender for IoT sensors may run on Linux and provide guidance for common Linux network monitoring/validation tasks.
  • If relevant, provide sample configuration or verification steps for other operating systems/platforms where Defender for IoT sensors may be deployed.