Defender For IoT

190
Total Pages
167
Linux-Friendly Pages
23
Pages with Bias
12.1%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

79 issues found
Showing 1-25 of 79 flagged pages
Defender For IoT Configure a monitoring interface using a Hyper-V vSwitch - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...izations/traffic-mirroring/configure-mirror-hyper-v.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-14 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is exclusively focused on configuring traffic mirroring using Hyper-V, a Windows-only virtualization technology. All examples and instructions use Windows tools (PowerShell, Hyper-V Manager), with no mention of Linux or cross-platform alternatives. There are no Linux/macOS equivalents or guidance for users on those platforms.
Recommendations
  • Clarify early in the documentation that the procedure is specific to Windows/Hyper-V, and note any Linux/macOS limitations.
  • Provide links or references to equivalent procedures for Linux virtualization platforms (e.g., KVM, VMware ESXi, VirtualBox) if supported.
  • If Defender for IoT supports Linux-based deployments, add parallel instructions for configuring traffic mirroring on Linux hypervisors.
  • Include a comparison table of supported platforms and mirroring methods.
  • Explicitly state platform requirements and alternatives in the prerequisites section.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Configure a monitoring interface using a Hyper-V vSwitch - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...izations/traffic-mirroring/configure-mirror-hyper-v.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is exclusively focused on configuring traffic mirroring using Hyper-V vSwitch, a Windows-only virtualization technology. All examples and instructions use Windows tools (PowerShell, Hyper-V Manager), and there are no references to Linux or cross-platform alternatives. The documentation assumes a Windows environment throughout, with no guidance for Linux or macOS users.
Recommendations
  • Add a section describing how to achieve similar traffic mirroring on Linux using KVM, libvirt, or Open vSwitch.
  • Provide equivalent command-line examples for Linux (e.g., using virsh, ovs-vsctl, or nmcli).
  • Clarify in the prerequisites that the procedure is Windows/Hyper-V specific, and link to Linux/macOS alternatives if available.
  • Consider including a comparison table of virtualization platforms and their mirroring capabilities.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Manage EIoT monitoring support | Microsoft Defender for IoT ...r-iot/organizations/manage-subscriptions-enterprise.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Microsoft 365 admin center, Defender XDR portal, and other Microsoft-centric tools and interfaces, which are primarily accessed via web portals optimized for Windows environments. There are no examples or instructions for Linux users, such as command-line alternatives, REST API usage, or integration with Linux-native tools. The documentation assumes the use of Windows-based administrative workflows and does not mention Linux compatibility or parity.
Recommendations
  • Include instructions or examples for managing EIoT monitoring support via REST APIs or CLI tools that are platform-agnostic and usable from Linux systems.
  • Explicitly state whether the described portals and workflows are accessible and fully functional from Linux environments (e.g., browser compatibility, no dependency on Windows-only features).
  • Provide Linux-specific guidance for license management, device inventory, and configuration, such as using Azure CLI, PowerShell Core (cross-platform), or other relevant tools.
  • Add a section comparing Windows and Linux administrative experiences, highlighting any differences and ensuring Linux users are not disadvantaged.
  • Mention any limitations or requirements for Linux users upfront, and link to Linux-focused documentation where available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT What's new in Microsoft Defender for IoT for device builders ...cles/defender-for-iot/device-builders/release-notes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page shows a moderate Windows bias. Command-line automation is presented with Azure CLI and PowerShell examples, but there is no mention of Linux shell equivalents (e.g., bash scripts). PowerShell is highlighted alongside Azure CLI, which is cross-platform, but there are no explicit Linux-specific instructions or examples. Windows tools (PowerShell) are mentioned before any Linux alternatives, and there is a lack of parity in example coverage for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux shell (bash) examples for firmware analysis automation alongside PowerShell and Azure CLI.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide usage instructions for Linux environments.
  • Include Linux-specific troubleshooting, installation, and usage notes where relevant.
  • Ensure that any command-line instructions are presented in a platform-neutral way, or provide both Windows and Linux examples side by side.
  • Highlight Linux support (e.g., Debian, Ubuntu) earlier and more prominently in the documentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Inventory management API reference for OT monitoring sensors - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...der-for-iot/organizations/api/sensor-inventory-apis.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Windows Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: Windows operating systems are listed first and in much greater detail than Linux or other OSes; the supported OS list is dominated by Windows variants, with Linux and Mac OS mentioned only once and much later in the list. There are no Linux-specific examples, tools, or usage patterns provided, and no mention of Linux command-line alternatives (e.g., wget, httpie, or shell scripting) beyond generic cURL commands. The CVE examples also focus on Microsoft products. No PowerShell-specific examples are present, but the overall documentation structure and content prioritize Windows environments.
Recommendations
  • List operating systems in alphabetical order or group by type (Windows, Linux, Mac, etc.) to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Expand the supported OS list to include more Linux distributions and variants (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS, Red Hat, Debian) and provide details where possible.
  • Include Linux-specific usage examples, such as shell scripting, wget, or httpie commands, alongside cURL.
  • Add CVE examples that reference vulnerabilities in Linux and other non-Windows platforms.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility and provide guidance for both Windows and Linux users where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT HPE ProLiant DL20 Gen10 Plus (NHP 2LFF) for OT monitoring in SMB/ L500 deployments - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...ations/appliance-catalog/hpe-proliant-dl20-plus-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by exclusively referencing Windows-centric installation procedures (BIOS, iLO, hardware setup) and omitting any mention of Linux-specific installation steps, tools, or CLI commands. There are no examples or guidance for Linux users, nor is there any parity in instructions for Linux environments. The page assumes a Windows-style workflow and hardware management, with no reference to Linux equivalents or alternative approaches.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit instructions for installing Defender for IoT on Linux-based systems, including CLI commands and supported distributions.
  • Include examples of accessing and configuring the appliance using Linux tools (e.g., SSH, Linux-based remote management utilities).
  • Mention Linux-compatible methods for updating passwords, configuring network interfaces, and managing BIOS/UEFI settings.
  • Provide parity in screenshots and step-by-step guides for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Clarify any OS-specific requirements or limitations for Defender for IoT installation and operation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT User management for Microsoft Defender for IoT ...efender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell as a primary method for role assignment, focusing on Microsoft Entra ID and Active Directory (Windows-centric technologies), and omitting Linux-specific user management tools or examples. There are no mentions of Linux command-line utilities, nor are there instructions for managing users or roles on Linux-based OT sensors. Windows tools and patterns are presented first and exclusively, with no parity for Linux environments.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux CLI examples for user and role management, such as using SSH, useradd, groupadd, or relevant Linux tools on OT sensors.
  • Provide guidance for integrating Linux-based authentication systems (e.g., LDAP on Linux, PAM, SSSD) alongside Active Directory.
  • Mention and document Linux-compatible methods for assigning roles and permissions, both in Azure and on-premises.
  • Ensure examples and instructions are provided for both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux (Bash/CLI) environments.
  • Clarify whether OT sensors support Linux-native user management and, if so, provide documentation for those workflows.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Manage Azure users for Microsoft Defender for IoT .../defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-portal.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Azure PowerShell for role assignments, listing Windows-centric tools and patterns before any Linux alternatives, and omitting Linux CLI (e.g., Azure CLI) examples for user and group management. All procedural guidance and linked tutorials focus on the Azure portal or PowerShell, with no mention of Linux-native workflows or cross-platform command-line tools.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI examples for all user and group management tasks, including role assignments and access checks.
  • Ensure that references to PowerShell are paired with Azure CLI instructions, especially in tutorial links.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility for management tasks and tools.
  • Include screenshots or step-by-step instructions for Linux environments where relevant.
  • Review linked resources to ensure Linux parity and update them if necessary.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Configure a monitoring interface using a Hyper-V vSwitch - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...izations/traffic-mirroring/configure-mirror-hyper-v.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is heavily focused on Windows-specific technologies and tools, particularly Hyper-V and PowerShell. All examples and instructions use Windows tools (PowerShell, Hyper-V Manager) and Microsoft-specific features (NDIS Capture Extensions), with no mention or examples for Linux or cross-platform equivalents. The structure and flow of the page assume a Windows environment from the outset, and there is no guidance for users on Linux or other hypervisors.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent instructions for configuring traffic mirroring and virtual switches using Linux-based hypervisors such as KVM, QEMU, or VMware ESXi.
  • Provide examples using Linux command-line tools (e.g., ip, brctl, virsh) for creating and managing virtual switches and port mirroring.
  • Include a section comparing Hyper-V with Linux virtualization solutions, outlining differences and similarities in configuring monitoring interfaces.
  • Reference Linux documentation or community resources for users deploying Defender for IoT in non-Windows environments.
  • Clarify in the prerequisites or introduction that the instructions are specific to Windows/Hyper-V, and suggest alternatives for Linux users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Integrate Palo Alto with Microsoft Defender for IoT ...s/defender-for-iot/organizations/tutorial-palo-alto.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-based SCADA systems and protocols (e.g., OPC), focusing on Microsoft-centric cloud solutions (Microsoft Sentinel, Defender for IoT), and omitting Linux-specific integration examples or tools. There are no examples or instructions for Linux environments, and Windows terminology appears first or exclusively when discussing protocols and integration patterns.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific integration examples, such as syslog forwarding or API usage from Linux-based OT sensors.
  • Mention Linux-based SCADA systems and protocols alongside Windows-based ones (e.g., Modbus, DNP3, BACnet).
  • Provide parity in instructions for configuring integrations from both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Reference open-source SIEM/SOAR solutions (e.g., ELK stack, Wazuh) as alternatives or complements to Microsoft Sentinel.
  • Clarify that the integration steps are applicable to both Windows and Linux OT sensors, or specify any platform limitations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT What's new in Microsoft Defender for IoT for device builders ...cles/defender-for-iot/device-builders/release-notes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by listing PowerShell commands and tools alongside Azure CLI, but does not provide explicit Linux shell examples or mention Linux-native tools. PowerShell is referenced before or equally with Azure CLI, which is cross-platform but often associated with Windows. There are no bash or Linux shell command examples, and no mention of Linux-specific patterns or workflows, despite the product supporting Linux platforms.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit bash or Linux shell command examples for all workflows currently shown with PowerShell.
  • When listing automation options, mention bash/Linux shell scripts and Azure CLI before PowerShell, or clarify cross-platform support.
  • Include references to Linux-native tools or patterns where relevant, especially in sections about firmware analysis and agent installation.
  • Ensure that screenshots and UI descriptions do not assume a Windows environment, and clarify platform support where applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Inventory management API reference for OT monitoring sensors - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...der-for-iot/organizations/api/sensor-inventory-apis.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Windows Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily in the listing of supported operating systems, where Windows variants are listed first and in much greater detail than Linux or other OSes. The examples and API usage are platform-neutral (using cURL), but there are no Linux-specific examples or references to Linux tools. The CVE examples focus on Microsoft products, further reinforcing the Windows-centric perspective.
Recommendations
  • List operating systems in alphabetical order or group by type (Windows, Linux, Mac, etc.) to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Expand the list of Linux distributions and versions in the supported operating systems section, providing parity with the detailed Windows breakdown.
  • Include Linux-specific examples or references, such as using wget or other common Linux tools, alongside cURL.
  • Provide CVE examples that include vulnerabilities for Linux and other non-Windows platforms.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility in API usage sections, and note any platform-specific considerations if relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT HPE ProLiant DL20 Gen10 Plus (NHP 2LFF) for OT monitoring in SMB/ L500 deployments - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...ations/appliance-catalog/hpe-proliant-dl20-plus-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on hardware setup and installation procedures using HPE's BIOS and iLO utilities, which are platform-agnostic but described in a manner typical for Windows-centric environments. There are no examples or instructions for Linux-specific installation, management, or CLI commands. The installation references downloading software from the Azure portal and connecting via CLI, but does not specify or provide examples for Linux environments, nor does it mention Linux tools or workflows. Windows tools and patterns (BIOS, iLO, F9/F10 keys, GUI navigation) are described first and exclusively, with no Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux installation instructions, including CLI commands for mounting installation media, running installers, and configuring network settings.
  • Provide examples of how to perform remote management and configuration using Linux tools (e.g., SSH, ipmitool, Linux-based iLO utilities).
  • Include screenshots or terminal outputs from Linux environments to complement the BIOS/iLO GUI steps.
  • Clarify whether the Defender for IoT software supports Linux deployments and, if so, provide guidance for those scenarios.
  • Mention Linux equivalents for hardware management tasks (e.g., using dmidecode, lshw, or other Linux utilities to verify hardware specs).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Import extra data for detected OT devices - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...-iot/organizations/how-to-import-device-information.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing examples and references that prioritize Windows operating systems. The device information example exclusively uses Windows 7, and the supported values table lists Windows and Windows Server variants first and in much greater detail than Linux or other OSes. There are no Linux-specific examples, and the 'Next steps' section links only to Windows endpoint detection scripts, omitting Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific examples in the device information example table (e.g., show a row for a Linux device).
  • Expand the supported values table to list common Linux distributions (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS, Red Hat) and other non-Windows OSes with similar granularity.
  • Add 'Next steps' links or guidance for detecting and managing Linux endpoints, not just Windows.
  • Ensure that instructions and screenshots (if any) are OS-agnostic or provide parallel steps for Linux environments where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Manage EIoT monitoring support | Microsoft Defender for IoT ...r-iot/organizations/manage-subscriptions-enterprise.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation exclusively references Microsoft 365 admin center, Defender XDR portal, and other Microsoft-specific tools and workflows, which are primarily accessed via web interfaces or Windows environments. There are no examples or instructions for Linux users, nor are cross-platform CLI or API alternatives mentioned. The documentation assumes use of Microsoft portals and does not address Linux-based management or automation options.
Recommendations
  • Include instructions for accessing and managing Defender for IoT features via cross-platform tools such as REST APIs or CLI (e.g., Azure CLI, PowerShell Core on Linux).
  • Provide examples or notes for Linux users, such as how to perform license management or device inventory tasks from Linux systems.
  • Clarify whether the web portals and admin centers are fully accessible from Linux browsers and note any limitations.
  • If PowerShell is required, specify that PowerShell Core is supported on Linux and provide equivalent command-line examples.
  • Add references to documentation or tools that support Linux environments for enterprise IoT management.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Manage Azure users for Microsoft Defender for IoT .../defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-portal.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing a PowerShell example for group access management without mentioning or providing equivalent Linux/CLI examples. References to Azure PowerShell are made before any mention of cross-platform tools, and there are no instructions or examples for managing users using Azure CLI or Bash, which are commonly used on Linux and macOS. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tools and patterns, potentially excluding Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI examples for all user and group management tasks currently shown with PowerShell.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide links to its documentation.
  • Ensure that instructions for managing users and roles are not limited to Windows/PowerShell, but also cover Linux and macOS workflows.
  • Where screenshots or UI instructions are given, clarify that these steps are platform-agnostic or note any platform-specific differences.
  • Review all linked tutorials to ensure Linux parity and add references to Linux-friendly tools and commands where appropriate.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT User management for Microsoft Defender for IoT ...efender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page shows a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric tools and patterns, such as PowerShell and Active Directory, for user management. Examples and instructions reference PowerShell for role assignment and focus on Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) and Active Directory integration, which are Windows-native technologies. There is no mention of Linux-native tools or command-line examples (e.g., Bash, Linux CLI), nor are alternative Linux authentication or user management methods discussed.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux CLI examples for user and role management, such as using Azure CLI on Linux or Bash scripts.
  • Mention Linux-compatible authentication methods (e.g., LDAP, Kerberos) and how they can be integrated with Defender for IoT.
  • Provide parity in instructions for assigning roles and managing users using Linux tools, not just PowerShell.
  • Reference Linux user management best practices and tools where relevant, such as integration with Linux-based identity providers.
  • Clarify which features and integrations are cross-platform and which are Windows-specific.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Configure a monitoring interface using a Hyper-V vSwitch - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...izations/traffic-mirroring/configure-mirror-hyper-v.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is heavily biased towards Windows environments, specifically Hyper-V and PowerShell. All configuration steps, examples, and tool references are exclusively for Windows, with no mention of Linux equivalents (such as KVM, libvirt, or Open vSwitch). The instructions assume the use of Windows-specific tools (Hyper-V Manager, PowerShell cmdlets) and do not provide guidance for users on Linux or other platforms.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent instructions for Linux-based virtualization platforms (e.g., KVM, libvirt, Open vSwitch) including how to configure traffic mirroring and promiscuous mode.
  • Provide CLI examples using Linux tools (such as ip, ovs-vsctl, or virsh) alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Include a section discussing cross-platform considerations and limitations, helping users choose the right platform for their environment.
  • Reference Linux documentation or external resources for users who need to implement similar functionality outside Windows.
  • Clearly state at the beginning that the guide is Windows/Hyper-V specific, and link to Linux guides if available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Integrate Palo Alto with Microsoft Defender for IoT ...s/defender-for-iot/organizations/tutorial-palo-alto.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily through its references to Windows-based SCADA systems, the lack of Linux-specific examples or tooling, and the exclusive mention of Microsoft-centric cloud services (Microsoft Sentinel, Defender for IoT). There are no examples or instructions tailored for Linux environments, nor are Linux tools or patterns discussed. The only protocol example given (OPC) is described as a 'standard protocol used by Windows-based SCADA systems,' reinforcing the Windows-centric perspective.
Recommendations
  • Include examples and instructions for integrating Palo Alto with Defender for IoT in Linux-based environments, such as using syslog-ng, rsyslog, or other common Linux logging tools.
  • Mention Linux-based SCADA systems and protocols, and provide equivalent integration steps or considerations.
  • Add sample configurations or command-line examples for Linux (e.g., shell scripts, configuration file snippets) alongside or before Windows-specific instructions.
  • Clarify whether the integration steps are OS-agnostic or provide explicit guidance for both Windows and Linux deployments.
  • Reference open-source SIEM/SOAR solutions (such as ELK Stack, Wazuh) where appropriate, to broaden applicability beyond Microsoft Sentinel.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT What's new archive for Microsoft Defender for IoT for organizations ...es/defender-for-iot/organizations/whats-new-archive.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation shows some Windows bias, particularly in the April 2023 update where only Windows workstation and server enrichment scripts are mentioned, with no equivalent for Linux systems. Windows-centric tools (Active Directory, Microsoft Entra ID) are referenced for SSO and sensor management, and Windows examples or terminology (such as 'workstation', 'server', 'Active Directory') appear before or instead of Linux equivalents. There is a lack of Linux-specific enrichment or troubleshooting examples, and Windows tools are often presented as the default or primary option.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent enrichment scripts and examples for Linux workstations and servers, not just Windows.
  • When describing features like SSO or directory integration, mention and provide guidance for common Linux alternatives (e.g., LDAP, FreeIPA) alongside Active Directory and Entra ID.
  • Include Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and examples where Windows-specific ones are given.
  • Ensure protocol and integration examples are balanced between Windows and Linux environments.
  • Where possible, use cross-platform terminology and avoid assuming Windows as the default OS.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/device-builders/release-notes.md ...cles/defender-for-iot/device-builders/release-notes.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by listing PowerShell commands alongside Azure CLI for firmware analysis automation, with no explicit mention or examples of Linux shell usage (e.g., bash). Windows tools (PowerShell) are referenced before or alongside cross-platform tools, but Linux-specific equivalents or examples are missing. There is no guidance for Linux users on how to perform the same tasks using native Linux tools or shell environments.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for all command-line instructions, especially for firmware analysis automation.
  • Clarify cross-platform compatibility for Azure CLI and PowerShell, including installation and usage notes for Linux environments.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, also mention Linux alternatives (e.g., bash scripts, native Linux tools) and provide parity in documentation.
  • Ensure that any screenshots or UI references do not assume a Windows environment and clarify if features are available on Linux.
  • Review and update onboarding and upgrade instructions to include Linux-specific steps and troubleshooting.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/api/sensor-inventory-apis.md ...der-for-iot/organizations/api/sensor-inventory-apis.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Windows Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily in the listing and ordering of supported operating systems, where Windows versions are listed first and in detail, while Linux is mentioned only once and much later in the list. There are no Linux-specific examples, tools, or patterns provided; all command-line examples use cURL, which is cross-platform, but there is no mention of PowerShell or Windows-specific tools either. The CVE examples focus on Microsoft products, but this is likely due to the nature of the product rather than documentation bias.
Recommendations
  • List Linux and other non-Windows operating systems more prominently and equitably in supported values tables, ideally alphabetically or grouped by type.
  • Provide Linux-specific usage notes or troubleshooting tips where relevant, especially for API authentication and SSL/TLS (e.g., curl -k).
  • Include CVE examples that reference vulnerabilities in Linux or other non-Windows platforms to demonstrate broader applicability.
  • Explicitly state that the API and examples are platform-agnostic, and mention any platform-specific caveats if they exist.
  • If PowerShell or Windows-specific tools are relevant, provide equivalent Linux shell (bash) or scripting examples.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/eiot-defender-for-endpoint.md ...er-for-iot/organizations/eiot-defender-for-endpoint.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation focuses exclusively on Microsoft Defender XDR and Defender for Endpoint, which are primarily Windows-centric tools. All procedures and examples are given in the context of the Microsoft Defender portal, with no mention of Linux-specific steps, tools, or command-line examples. There are no references to Linux agent deployment, Linux-specific troubleshooting, or parity in monitoring workflows. The documentation implicitly assumes a Windows-first environment, omitting guidance for Linux endpoints or mixed OS environments.
Recommendations
  • Include explicit instructions for onboarding and monitoring Linux-based IoT devices, such as supported Linux distributions and agent installation steps.
  • Provide examples of how to view IoT device security data from Linux endpoints, including screenshots or CLI commands where applicable.
  • Mention any limitations or differences in Defender for Endpoint features on Linux versus Windows, and offer workarounds or alternatives.
  • Add troubleshooting steps or FAQs for Linux users, such as common issues with agent deployment or data collection.
  • Ensure that examples and procedures are presented in a cross-platform manner, with equal emphasis on Windows and Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-overview.md ...efender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by primarily referencing Microsoft-centric tools and workflows, such as PowerShell and Active Directory, for user management. Examples and instructions for user and role management are given for the Azure portal and PowerShell, with no mention of Linux CLI tools or Linux-native user management approaches. Integration examples focus on Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) and LDAP, but only in the context of Active Directory. There is no guidance for Linux-based user management, nor are Linux equivalents (such as CLI commands or open-source LDAP solutions) referenced.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux CLI examples for user and role management in Azure (e.g., using Azure CLI on Linux).
  • Provide instructions for managing users on OT sensors using Linux-native tools or commands, if supported.
  • Mention open-source LDAP solutions (such as OpenLDAP) and provide integration steps for non-Active Directory environments.
  • Add parity in examples by showing both PowerShell and Bash/Azure CLI commands for role assignments.
  • Clarify whether OT sensors support Linux authentication mechanisms (e.g., PAM, local /etc/passwd management) and document those options if available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-portal.md .../defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-portal.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing a PowerShell example for granting group access to Azure resources, while omitting equivalent Linux or cross-platform CLI examples. The use of Azure PowerShell is highlighted before any mention of Azure CLI or other platform-agnostic tools, and there are no Linux-specific instructions or examples for user management tasks.
Recommendations
  • Include Azure CLI examples alongside or before PowerShell examples for all user and group management tasks.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is available on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide platform-agnostic instructions.
  • Add links or sections for Linux and macOS users, detailing how to perform the same tasks using their preferred environments.
  • Ensure screenshots and step-by-step guides do not assume a Windows environment unless absolutely necessary.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 1 of 4 Next →