Defender For IoT

190
Total Pages
167
Linux-Friendly Pages
23
Pages with Bias
12.1%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

79 issues found
Showing 51-75 of 79 flagged pages
Defender For IoT Manage EIoT monitoring support | Microsoft Defender for IoT ...r-iot/organizations/manage-subscriptions-enterprise.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-14 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation page exclusively references Microsoft 365 admin center, Defender XDR portal, and related Microsoft cloud tools, which are primarily accessed via web interfaces or Windows-centric environments. There are no Linux/macOS-specific instructions, CLI alternatives, or parity examples. All procedures assume use of Microsoft portals, which are most commonly used in Windows environments, and do not mention PowerShell, but still lack any Linux command-line or tool references.
Recommendations
  • Provide CLI-based instructions using cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, Microsoft Graph API) for license management and device inventory.
  • Explicitly note platform compatibility for web portals and clarify if Linux/macOS users can perform all steps via browser.
  • Include examples or links for Linux/macOS users to manage licenses and device inventory, such as using REST APIs or command-line tools.
  • Add troubleshooting notes for non-Windows users if any portal features require Edge/IE or Windows-specific plugins.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Manage Azure users for Microsoft Defender for IoT .../defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-portal.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-14 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. While most instructions focus on using the Azure portal (which is cross-platform), the only command-line example provided for managing Azure RBAC is via Azure PowerShell, with no mention of Azure CLI or Linux/macOS alternatives. Additionally, links and examples prioritize Windows-centric tools and workflows, such as PowerShell, without offering parity for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Include Azure CLI examples alongside Azure PowerShell for role assignment and management tasks.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure portal is accessible from any OS and clarify any OS-specific requirements for command-line tools.
  • Add links to Azure CLI documentation for RBAC and user management.
  • Ensure that any screenshots or step-by-step guides do not assume a Windows environment.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT User management for Microsoft Defender for IoT ...efender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-overview.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. PowerShell is mentioned as a primary method for role assignment in Azure, with no Linux/macOS CLI alternatives (e.g., Azure CLI or Bash) referenced. Active Directory and Microsoft Entra ID are discussed as central identity solutions, which are Windows-centric. Examples and tool references (PowerShell, AD) are presented before any mention of Linux-compatible methods, and there are no explicit Linux/macOS examples or parity notes.
Recommendations
  • Include Azure CLI and Bash examples for role assignment alongside PowerShell.
  • Explicitly mention Linux/macOS compatibility for on-premises sensor management and user creation.
  • Reference cross-platform identity solutions or clarify how Linux-based LDAP servers can integrate.
  • Add parity notes or links to Linux/macOS documentation for relevant tasks.
  • Balance examples and tool references so that Linux/macOS users are not left out or forced to infer their own solutions.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Manage Azure users for Microsoft Defender for IoT .../defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-users-portal.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page shows a mild Windows bias by referencing Azure PowerShell for group role assignments and listing Windows-centric tools before alternatives. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform CLI examples, and PowerShell is mentioned as the default for scripting, which may create friction for Linux/macOS users.
Recommendations
  • Include Azure CLI examples alongside or before Azure PowerShell examples, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux/macOS.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure portal and Azure CLI are available on all major platforms.
  • Provide links to Azure CLI documentation for role assignments and user/group management.
  • Clarify that PowerShell is not required and offer parity in examples for Linux/macOS users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT What's new in Microsoft Defender for IoT for device builders ...cles/defender-for-iot/device-builders/release-notes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias, primarily through the explicit mention of PowerShell commands and tools, and by listing Azure CLI and PowerShell together (with PowerShell—a Windows-centric tool—called out specifically). There are no Linux/macOS-specific command examples or equivalent tooling references, and Windows tools are mentioned before cross-platform alternatives. However, the page does reference support for Linux distributions (Debian, Ubuntu) and does not present critical tasks as Windows-only.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux/macOS command examples (e.g., Bash, shell scripts) alongside PowerShell.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide usage examples for Linux/macOS.
  • Mention Linux-native tools or workflows where appropriate, especially for firmware analysis and agent management.
  • Ensure that references to PowerShell are balanced with equivalent instructions for Linux/macOS users.
  • Where possible, use neutral, platform-agnostic language when describing features and workflows.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Import extra data for detected OT devices - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...-iot/organizations/how-to-import-device-information.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Windows-based examples (e.g., 'Windows 7' in the sample device data), listing Windows operating systems first and in much greater detail than Linux or macOS, and omitting Linux/macOS-specific examples or guidance. The 'Next steps' section also links specifically to Windows endpoint detection, with no Linux/macOS equivalent.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux and macOS examples in the device information example table (e.g., show a row with 'Linux' or 'macOS' as the Device OS).
  • Expand the 'Supported values for Device operating system' table to provide more parity for Linux/macOS (e.g., list common Linux distributions such as Ubuntu, CentOS, Debian, etc.).
  • Add guidance or examples for users who manage non-Windows devices, including any OS-specific considerations.
  • In the 'Next steps' section, provide links or references for detecting or managing Linux/macOS endpoints, if supported.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Manage EIoT monitoring support | Microsoft Defender for IoT ...r-iot/organizations/manage-subscriptions-enterprise.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation exclusively references Microsoft 365 admin center, Defender XDR portal, and other Microsoft cloud tools, which are primarily accessed via web interfaces or Windows-centric environments. There are no Linux/macOS-specific instructions, CLI examples, or alternative workflows for non-Windows platforms. The documentation assumes access to Microsoft portals and does not mention PowerShell, but the overall workflow is heavily oriented toward Windows ecosystem tools and patterns.
Recommendations
  • Provide CLI-based instructions using cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, Microsoft Graph API) for license management and device monitoring.
  • Explicitly state platform requirements and whether the web portals are accessible and fully functional on Linux/macOS browsers.
  • Include examples or notes for Linux/macOS users, such as how to access the admin center or perform equivalent actions without relying on Windows-only features.
  • If PowerShell or Windows-only tools are required for any steps, offer alternatives or clarify limitations for Linux/macOS users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Set up enterprise IoT security - Defender for IoT ...er-for-iot/organizations/eiot-defender-for-endpoint.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exclusively references Microsoft Defender XDR and Defender for Endpoint, which are primarily Windows-centric tools. All procedures and examples are given in the context of the Microsoft Defender portal, with no mention of Linux-specific workflows, tools, or command-line examples. There are no references to Linux endpoints, Linux agent deployment, or Linux-specific configuration steps, and all advanced hunting queries are shown only for the Microsoft 365 Defender platform.
Recommendations
  • Include explicit instructions or notes for Linux endpoints, such as how to onboard Linux devices to Defender for Endpoint.
  • Provide examples of agent deployment and configuration for Linux systems, including relevant command-line steps.
  • Mention Linux compatibility and any platform-specific limitations or considerations.
  • Add advanced hunting query examples that demonstrate monitoring or securing Linux-based IoT devices.
  • Reference Linux-native security tools or integration points where applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Microsoft Defender for IoT alert reference ...efender-for-iot/organizations/alert-engine-messages.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page for Microsoft Defender for IoT alert reference shows mild Windows bias. Several alert types and descriptions specifically mention Windows processes and services (e.g., 'Unauthorized Windows Process', 'Unauthorized Windows Service', 'Suspicion of Remote Windows Service Management', 'Suspicion of Remote Code Execution with PsExec'), and malware alerts focus on threats that are historically Windows-centric (e.g., WannaCry, NotPetya, DoublePulsar, Conficker). There are no Linux-specific examples, tools, or patterns mentioned. Windows-related alerts and terminology appear before or in greater detail than any Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific alert types and examples, such as unauthorized Linux process/service detection, SSH brute force, or Linux malware (e.g., Mirai, Bashdoor).
  • Include references to Linux tools and management patterns where relevant (e.g., systemd services, Linux process management, Linux-specific remote code execution techniques).
  • Balance malware examples to include Linux/Unix threats alongside Windows-centric ones.
  • Where alerts reference Windows tools (e.g., PsExec), provide Linux equivalents (e.g., SSH, SCP, cron jobs) and describe detection for those.
  • Review alert descriptions and ensure parity in coverage for both Windows and Linux environments, especially in operational and malware sections.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Import extra data for detected OT devices - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...-iot/organizations/how-to-import-device-information.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing examples and supported values that prioritize Windows operating systems. The device information example only shows Windows 7, and the supported OS values table lists Windows and Windows Server variants extensively before mentioning Linux and other non-Windows OSes. There are no Linux-specific examples or guidance, and the 'Next steps' section highlights Windows endpoint detection with no Linux equivalent.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific examples in device information tables and sample .csv files (e.g., show a row for a Linux device).
  • Expand the supported OS values table to list Linux distributions (e.g., Ubuntu, Red Hat, CentOS) and other non-Windows OSes with equal detail as Windows.
  • Add 'Next steps' links or documentation for detecting and managing Linux endpoints, similar to the Windows script example.
  • Ensure instructions for creating and editing .csv files mention Linux-compatible tools (e.g., LibreOffice Calc, command-line CSV editors) alongside Excel.
  • Review all examples and instructions to provide parity for Linux environments, not just Windows.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT What's new archive for Microsoft Defender for IoT for organizations ...es/defender-for-iot/organizations/whats-new-archive.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias, primarily through the prioritization of Windows-related tools and terminology. Windows concepts (such as Active Directory, Microsoft Entra ID, and Windows workstation/server enrichment) are mentioned before or more prominently than Linux equivalents. There is a lack of Linux-specific examples, and Windows-centric tools are referenced without always providing parity for Linux environments. However, the documentation does acknowledge Linux (Debian) as the sensor OS and provides some Linux-related installation details, but Windows tools and patterns are generally introduced first or exclusively.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-specific examples and instructions alongside Windows ones, especially for features like enrichment scripts and SSO setup.
  • When referencing tools (e.g., Active Directory, Entra ID), mention Linux-compatible alternatives or clarify cross-platform support.
  • Ensure that protocol and troubleshooting guidance includes both Windows and Linux scenarios, with equal detail.
  • Add CLI and automation examples for Linux environments where Windows scripts/utilities are mentioned.
  • Review documentation for any Windows-centric terminology and balance with Linux equivalents.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Set up enterprise IoT security - Defender for IoT ...er-for-iot/organizations/eiot-defender-for-endpoint.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by exclusively referencing Microsoft Defender XDR, Defender for Endpoint, and related portals, which are primarily Windows-centric. All procedures and examples assume usage of the Microsoft Defender XDR portal, with no mention of Linux-specific tools, command-line interfaces, or alternative workflows for Linux environments. There are no Linux or cross-platform examples, and no guidance for users managing IoT security from Linux systems.
Recommendations
  • Include instructions or notes for Linux administrators, such as how to access relevant features via command-line tools or APIs.
  • Provide examples of onboarding Defender for Endpoint agents on Linux devices, if supported.
  • Mention any Linux-compatible management interfaces or CLI tools for enabling and monitoring Enterprise IoT security.
  • Clarify platform requirements and limitations, especially if certain features are only available on Windows.
  • Add parity in troubleshooting and advanced hunting examples, showing how Linux-based IoT devices are handled.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Microsoft Defender for IoT alert reference ...efender-for-iot/organizations/alert-engine-messages.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page for Microsoft Defender for IoT alert reference shows mild Windows bias. Several alert types and malware detection entries focus on Windows-specific threats (e.g., SMB, Windows Service, Windows Process, PsExec, NotPetya, WannaCry, DoublePulsar, Conficker, Stuxnet), and Windows terminology appears in alert titles and descriptions. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform examples, and Windows-related alerts (process/service) are present, but Linux equivalents (e.g., Linux process/service anomalies) are missing. However, the page is primarily protocol and device focused, so the bias is limited to the inclusion and prioritization of Windows-specific threats and terminology.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Linux/Unix alert types (e.g., unauthorized Linux process/service, SSH brute force, Linux-specific malware) to demonstrate parity.
  • Include examples or references to Linux/Unix tools and threats where relevant (e.g., Linux ransomware, Linux rootkits, SSH attacks).
  • Balance Windows-specific alerts with similar coverage for Linux/Unix environments, especially in sections discussing process/service anomalies and malware.
  • Where possible, use neutral terminology (e.g., 'endpoint process/service anomaly') and clarify when alerts apply to multiple operating systems.
  • Review alert descriptions for implicit Windows-first assumptions and update to reflect cross-platform applicability.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/how-to-import-device-information.md ...-iot/organizations/how-to-import-device-information.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by providing examples and references that prioritize Windows operating systems. The device information example only lists a Windows device, and the supported OS values table lists numerous Windows versions and servers before mentioning Linux and other operating systems. There are no Linux-specific examples or instructions, and the 'Next steps' section references Windows endpoint detection scripts without Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific examples in the device information example table, such as a row for a Linux device.
  • Expand the supported OS values table to list Linux distributions (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS, Red Hat) and other non-Windows OSes with equal detail and prominence.
  • Provide instructions or references for detecting and importing data for Linux endpoints, similar to the Windows script mentioned in 'Next steps'.
  • Ensure that examples and ordering in tables do not prioritize Windows over Linux, and present both platforms with parity.
  • Add guidance for users working in Linux environments, such as using LibreOffice Calc or command-line tools to edit CSV files.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/appliance-catalog/hpe-proliant-dl20-plus-smb.md ...ations/appliance-catalog/hpe-proliant-dl20-plus-smb.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on hardware specifications and installation procedures for the HPE ProLiant DL20 Gen10 Plus appliance in the context of Microsoft Defender for IoT. While it does not explicitly mention Windows or Linux, the installation and configuration steps (BIOS, iLO, boot options) are presented in a generic manner but lack any reference to Linux-specific installation procedures, tools, or troubleshooting. There are no examples or instructions for Linux users, nor is there mention of Linux command-line tools or patterns. The documentation implicitly assumes a Windows-centric environment by omitting Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific installation instructions, including steps for mounting installation media, running installation scripts, and configuring network settings using Linux tools.
  • Include examples of accessing the CLI via SSH from Linux and using Linux utilities for remote management.
  • Mention compatibility and best practices for deploying Defender for IoT on Linux-based systems, if supported.
  • Provide troubleshooting tips for common Linux deployment issues (e.g., driver support, RAID configuration, network interface setup).
  • Ensure that any references to downloading or preparing installation media include Linux methods (e.g., using dd to create bootable USB drives).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/alert-engine-messages.md ...efender-for-iot/organizations/alert-engine-messages.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page for Microsoft Defender for IoT alert reference demonstrates a mild Windows bias. Several alert types and descriptions specifically mention Windows processes and services (e.g., 'Unauthorized Windows Process', 'Unauthorized Windows Service', 'Suspicion of Remote Code Execution with PsExec', 'Suspicion of Remote Windows Service Management'), and malware alerts focus on Windows-specific threats (e.g., WannaCry, NotPetya, DoublePulsar, Conficker). There are no Linux-specific process/service alerts or malware examples, and Windows terminology appears before or instead of Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific alert types and examples, such as unauthorized Linux process/service detection, SSH brute force, or Linux-targeted malware (e.g., Mirai, Bashdoor).
  • Include references to Linux tools and patterns (e.g., systemd services, Linux process monitoring) alongside Windows examples.
  • Balance malware alert examples to include both Windows and Linux threats.
  • Where process/service alerts are described, clarify that similar alerts apply to Linux/Unix systems and provide equivalent terminology.
  • Review alert descriptions to ensure parity in coverage for Linux-based OT/IT environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-subscriptions-enterprise.md ...r-iot/organizations/manage-subscriptions-enterprise.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by exclusively referencing Microsoft-centric tools and portals (such as Microsoft 365 admin center, Microsoft Defender XDR, and Azure portal) for all management tasks. There are no examples or instructions for performing equivalent actions via Linux command line, cross-platform tools, or REST APIs. No mention is made of PowerShell, but the workflow assumes use of web-based admin centers and portals that are most commonly accessed from Windows environments. There are no Linux-specific instructions or parity examples.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent instructions for managing licenses and monitoring via REST APIs or CLI tools that are accessible from Linux environments.
  • Include examples or references for performing these tasks using cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI or Microsoft Graph API.
  • Explicitly state platform requirements or clarify if all actions can be performed from any OS with a supported browser.
  • If certain actions are only possible via Windows tools or portals, note this limitation and suggest workarounds for Linux users.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux administrators, outlining any differences or additional steps required.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/tutorial-fortinet.md ...es/defender-for-iot/organizations/tutorial-fortinet.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a bias towards Windows environments by exclusively referencing Fortinet's GUI and workflow, which is typically accessed via a web browser on Windows, and does not provide any Linux-specific instructions, CLI examples, or mention of Linux tools or patterns. There are no references to Linux commands, shell scripts, or alternative methods for users who may be operating Defender for IoT sensors or Fortinet devices from Linux systems.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux CLI examples for interacting with Fortinet APIs (e.g., using curl or wget to generate API keys or configure rules).
  • Include instructions for accessing Fortinet and Defender for IoT consoles from Linux environments, such as browser compatibility or SSH access.
  • Mention Linux-native tools or automation options (e.g., using Python scripts or Ansible for rule management).
  • Clarify that the workflows are platform-agnostic where possible, or specify any platform requirements.
  • Provide parity in screenshots or walkthroughs for Linux users, if GUI access differs.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/how-to-troubleshoot-sensor.md ...er-for-iot/organizations/how-to-troubleshoot-sensor.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is largely platform-neutral, focusing on the OT sensor's own web console and CLI. However, in the few places where remote CLI access is mentioned, only PuTTY (a Windows SSH client) is referenced as an example, and no Linux-native SSH tools (such as OpenSSH or terminal usage) are mentioned. There are no PowerShell-specific commands or Windows-only troubleshooting steps, but the examples and tool recommendations subtly assume a Windows environment for remote access.
Recommendations
  • When describing CLI access, mention both PuTTY (Windows) and native Linux/macOS SSH clients (e.g., 'ssh admin@<sensor-ip>') as options.
  • Include example commands for connecting via Linux/macOS terminal (e.g., 'ssh admin@<sensor-ip>'), not just PuTTY.
  • Where screenshots or instructions reference network configuration on a laptop, clarify that these steps apply to both Windows and Linux/macOS, and provide guidance for each if they differ.
  • If any troubleshooting steps involve file handling (e.g., downloading logs), mention how to perform these actions on Linux/macOS as well as Windows.
  • Review all tool recommendations to ensure Linux/macOS equivalents are mentioned alongside Windows tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/alert-engine-messages.md ...efender-for-iot/organizations/alert-engine-messages.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page for Microsoft Defender for IoT alert reference exhibits mild Windows bias. Several alert types and descriptions reference Windows-specific concepts, such as 'Unauthorized Windows Process', 'Unauthorized Windows Service', and malware alerts focused on Windows threats (e.g., WannaCry, NotPetya, DoublePulsar, Conficker, PsExec, SMB-related alerts). Windows terminology and attack vectors are present, but there are no explicit PowerShell-heavy examples, nor are Windows tools or patterns mentioned exclusively or before Linux equivalents in procedural or example content. There are no Linux-specific alert types or examples, and Linux threats are not highlighted, suggesting a lack of parity in platform coverage.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific alert types and examples, such as unauthorized Linux process/service detection, SSH brute force, or Linux-targeted malware (e.g., Mirai, Bash, etc.).
  • Include references to Linux attack vectors and MITRE ATT&CK techniques relevant to Linux environments.
  • Balance malware engine alerts to include Linux and cross-platform threats, not just Windows-centric ones.
  • Where Windows processes/services are mentioned, provide equivalent coverage for Linux daemons/processes.
  • Review alert descriptions and categories for implicit Windows-first assumptions and broaden to include Linux and other OSes where applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/manage-subscriptions-enterprise.md ...r-iot/organizations/manage-subscriptions-enterprise.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation exclusively references Microsoft 365 admin center, Microsoft Defender XDR, and other Microsoft portals and tools, which are primarily Windows-centric. There are no examples or instructions for Linux or cross-platform command-line usage, nor any mention of Linux-specific tools or workflows. All procedures assume use of the Microsoft web portals, which are generally accessed from Windows environments, and there is no discussion of Linux compatibility or alternative methods for Linux administrators.
Recommendations
  • Include information on whether the Microsoft Defender XDR and related admin centers are accessible and fully functional from Linux-based browsers and environments.
  • Provide command-line alternatives (e.g., using Azure CLI, Microsoft Graph API, or PowerShell Core on Linux) for key actions such as license management, device inventory, and service toggling.
  • Explicitly mention compatibility or provide guidance for Linux administrators, including any limitations or required steps when managing Defender for IoT from non-Windows systems.
  • Add examples or references for managing Defender for IoT using cross-platform tools, and clarify if any features are only available via Windows-specific interfaces.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/tutorial-fortinet.md ...es/defender-for-iot/organizations/tutorial-fortinet.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation focuses exclusively on Fortinet and Microsoft Defender for IoT integration using graphical interfaces and workflows typical of Windows environments. There is no mention of Linux-specific tools, CLI commands, or cross-platform alternatives. All examples and instructions assume use of FortiGate's web interface and Defender for IoT's GUI, with no guidance for Linux users or automation via shell scripts or Linux-native tools.
Recommendations
  • Include equivalent instructions for Linux environments, such as using curl or wget to interact with Fortinet APIs.
  • Provide CLI examples for API key creation and alert forwarding using Linux shell commands.
  • Mention cross-platform compatibility and clarify whether steps can be performed on Linux systems.
  • Add references to Linux-based monitoring or SIEM tools that could be integrated similarly.
  • Ensure screenshots and UI references are supplemented with text-based alternatives for headless or non-Windows environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/concept-sentinel-integration.md ...-for-iot/organizations/concept-sentinel-integration.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation is heavily focused on Microsoft Sentinel and Defender for IoT, both of which are Microsoft cloud-based tools. There are no explicit examples or instructions that are specific to Windows or PowerShell, but the documentation exclusively references Microsoft tools and workflows, with no mention of Linux-based alternatives, command-line examples, or cross-platform considerations. There are no Linux-specific instructions, nor is there any guidance for users who may be operating in non-Windows environments.
Recommendations
  • Include examples or references for integrating Defender for IoT and SIEM/SOAR workflows in Linux environments, such as using Linux-based log shippers or open-source SIEM tools.
  • Provide command-line examples that are cross-platform, or specify how to perform relevant tasks using Bash or Linux CLI tools where applicable.
  • Mention any platform requirements or compatibility notes, especially if certain features are only available or best supported on Windows.
  • If possible, highlight how Linux-based SOC teams can interact with Microsoft Sentinel (e.g., via REST APIs, CLI tools, or SDKs available for Linux).
  • Add documentation or links for users who may want to use non-Microsoft tools or hybrid environments, ensuring broader applicability.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/defender-for-iot/organizations/how-to-import-device-information.md ...-iot/organizations/how-to-import-device-information.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation is generally platform-neutral in its main instructions, focusing on CSV file manipulation and web UI actions. However, in the 'Next steps' section, it specifically references 'Detect Windows workstations and servers with a local script' as a follow-up, without mentioning Linux or cross-platform alternatives. Additionally, downloadable example files are in Excel (.xlsx) format, which is more closely associated with Windows environments, though CSV is also supported. There are no explicit Linux examples or references to Linux tools or workflows.
Recommendations
  • Include references to Linux or cross-platform device detection scripts in the 'Next steps' section, or clarify if such scripts are not available.
  • Provide example workflows or notes for editing CSV files using Linux-native tools (e.g., nano, vim, LibreOffice Calc) in addition to Excel.
  • If possible, offer downloadable example files in open formats (CSV only) and avoid referencing Excel-specific formats unless necessary.
  • Ensure parity in documentation by mentioning both Windows and Linux environments where relevant, especially in follow-up resources.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Defender For IoT Inventory management API reference for OT monitoring sensors - Microsoft Defender for IoT ...der-for-iot/organizations/api/sensor-inventory-apis.md
Low Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-14 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 1 bias type
Detected Bias Types
Windows First
Summary
The documentation lists supported operating systems for devices, with Windows variants presented first and in much greater detail than Linux or macOS. Linux and Mac OS are mentioned, but only as single entries after an extensive enumeration of Windows versions. No Windows-specific tools, examples, or patterns are present; all API usage examples use cURL, which is cross-platform.
Recommendations
  • List operating systems in alphabetical order or group by vendor, rather than prioritizing Windows.
  • Expand the Linux and macOS entries to specify supported distributions or versions, if applicable.
  • Add explicit statements confirming Linux/macOS support where relevant.
  • Consider including example device objects for Linux and macOS, not just Windows-centric ones.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 3 of 4 Next →