110
Total Pages
67
Linux-Friendly Pages
43
Pages with Bias
39.1%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues (71)

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows by providing migration instructions and advanced configuration steps (such as adding multiple prefixes to GatewaySubnet) exclusively via PowerShell, with no mention of Azure CLI, Bash, or other cross-platform/Linux-friendly tools. There are no Linux-specific or cross-platform command examples, and PowerShell is presented as the only scripting interface for automation, which may disadvantage Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI examples for all PowerShell instructions, especially for migration and subnet configuration tasks.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform options (e.g., Azure CLI, Bash scripts) alongside PowerShell in all relevant sections and next steps.
  • Where PowerShell is required due to feature gaps, clearly state this and provide a roadmap or workaround for Linux users.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux/macOS administrators, summarizing which steps can be performed using cross-platform tools and which currently require PowerShell.
  • Ensure that links to migration guides and troubleshooting include both PowerShell and Azure CLI/Bash options where possible.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation provides configuration steps using the Azure portal and Azure PowerShell, but does not mention or provide examples for Linux-native tools such as Azure CLI, nor does it reference Bash or shell scripting. The PowerShell example assumes the use of Windows or PowerShell Core, and there is no guidance for users on Linux or macOS platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for all PowerShell steps, ensuring Linux and macOS users have clear guidance.
  • Explicitly mention that PowerShell Core is cross-platform if relevant, or clarify any Windows-specific requirements.
  • Include Bash or shell scripting examples where appropriate.
  • Structure the documentation so that Azure CLI and PowerShell examples are presented together or allow the user to select their preferred platform.
  • Review included content (INCLUDE files) to ensure Linux parity is maintained throughout.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses PowerShell cmdlets and assumes the use of the Azure PowerShell module, with no mention of equivalent commands or tooling for Linux or cross-platform environments (such as Azure CLI, Bash, or REST API). All examples and prerequisites are Windows/PowerShell-centric, and there is no guidance for users on Linux or macOS systems.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions and examples using Azure CLI (az), which is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux and macOS.
  • Include Bash shell examples for retrieving ARP tables or interacting with Azure resources.
  • Mention REST API options for users who may want to automate or script the retrieval of ARP tables without PowerShell.
  • Clearly indicate which instructions are Windows/PowerShell-specific, and provide parallel sections for Linux/macOS users.
  • Update the prerequisites to mention both PowerShell and Azure CLI as supported tools for this operation.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows-first bias by linking only to instructions for configuring DSCP markings on Windows 10 clients and referencing Skype for Business/Teams workloads in a Windows-centric context. There are no examples or guidance for Linux or cross-platform environments, and no mention of Linux tools or methods for setting QoS/DSCP values.
Recommendations:
  • Include references or links to documentation for configuring DSCP markings and QoS policies on Linux systems (e.g., using iptables, tc, or systemd-networkd).
  • Provide cross-platform examples or a table summarizing how to set DSCP markings on both Windows and Linux clients.
  • Avoid linking exclusively to Windows-specific guides; instead, offer parallel guidance for Linux or note the absence of such guidance.
  • Explicitly mention whether the recommendations and requirements apply to non-Windows clients and, if so, how to implement them.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by providing all Azure-side command-line examples exclusively in PowerShell, with no equivalent Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash examples. Additionally, network validation steps from the client side use Windows tools (tracert) and Windows-style paths (C:\Users\...), with no mention of Linux alternatives (e.g., traceroute). This may disadvantage users operating from Linux or macOS environments.
Recommendations:
  • For every PowerShell example, provide an equivalent Azure CLI (az) command example, which is cross-platform and widely used on Linux/macOS.
  • When demonstrating network validation from the client side, include both Windows (tracert) and Linux (traceroute) command examples.
  • Use generic file paths or clarify that steps apply to both Windows and Linux environments where possible.
  • Explicitly mention that the procedures are applicable regardless of the on-premises OS, and provide guidance or links for users on non-Windows systems.
  • Consider including Bash script snippets or references to Linux-native tools for parity.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses the Azure portal GUI for all instructions and does not provide any command-line examples. There are no references to PowerShell, Windows tools, or CLI commands, but the lack of Azure CLI or Linux-based instructions means Linux users do not have parity. The documentation implicitly assumes a GUI-first (and thus, often Windows-first) workflow, which may disadvantage users who prefer or require command-line or Linux-native approaches.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI instructions for each step, ensuring they work on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed using the Azure CLI or Azure PowerShell, and provide links to relevant documentation.
  • Where verification steps are described (e.g., viewing ARP tables or route tables), include CLI commands (such as az network express-route or az network vnet-gateway) alongside portal instructions.
  • Ensure that any references to tools or workflows are cross-platform, or provide alternatives for Linux/macOS users.
  • Consider including a table or section comparing portal, Azure CLI, and PowerShell workflows for each major step.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page references Azure PowerShell as a configuration method for ExpressRoute FastPath, but does not mention or provide examples for Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux and macOS. The 'Next steps' section lists Azure PowerShell after the portal, but omits Azure CLI entirely. There are no command-line examples or instructions tailored for Linux users, and the only automation example is Windows-centric (PowerShell).
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI instructions and examples alongside or before Azure PowerShell in the 'Next steps' section and throughout the documentation.
  • Explicitly mention that both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI can be used for configuration, and provide parity in example commands.
  • Where scripts or automation are referenced, provide both PowerShell and Bash (or CLI) equivalents to ensure Linux users are supported.
  • Review the documentation for other Windows-centric terminology or tools, and ensure Linux alternatives are equally represented.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page does not provide any platform-specific configuration examples, but the only 'Next steps' link refers to using the Azure portal, which is a graphical tool most commonly used on Windows. There are no CLI, PowerShell, or Linux-based instructions or references, and no mention of cross-platform tools or automation approaches. This may implicitly bias the documentation towards Windows users and those using the Azure portal, while omitting parity for Linux or CLI-based workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit instructions and examples for configuring BGP communities using cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, ensuring both Windows and Linux users are supported.
  • Include sample command-line snippets for both PowerShell and Bash (Azure CLI) to demonstrate configuration steps.
  • Mention automation options (e.g., ARM templates, Terraform) that are platform-agnostic.
  • Ensure that references to the Azure portal are complemented by equivalent CLI or scripting instructions, and clarify that the portal is accessible from any OS.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily through the frequent mention of PowerShell and the Azure portal as configuration tools, with no equivalent Linux or cross-platform CLI examples provided. References to REST API and Azure CLI are present but are less emphasized and often listed after PowerShell. There are no Linux-specific instructions, nor are there examples using bash or Linux-native tools. This can make the documentation less accessible or intuitive for Linux users or those preferring cross-platform command-line tools.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI (az) examples alongside or before PowerShell examples for all configuration and management tasks.
  • Include bash shell snippets and Linux-native command-line instructions where relevant.
  • Ensure that references to management tools (Azure portal, PowerShell, REST API, Azure CLI) are presented in a neutral or parallel order, not prioritizing Windows tools.
  • Add explicit notes or sections for Linux users, clarifying any platform-specific considerations or differences.
  • Where screenshots or images of tools are shown, include both Windows and Linux variants if applicable.
  • Review all procedural steps to ensure parity between Windows and Linux environments, especially for automation and scripting.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation is heavily biased towards Windows and PowerShell usage. All command-line examples use Azure PowerShell cmdlets, and file paths are shown in Windows format (e.g., C:\Users\SampleUser\Downloads) before Linux/Cloud Shell equivalents. There are no CLI (az) or Bash examples, and Linux-specific guidance is minimal or secondary. The documentation assumes the use of Windows tools and environments, with only a brief mention of Cloud Shell for Linux-like environments.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside or instead of PowerShell, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • For each step, include both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux (Bash/CLI) command examples, clearly labeled.
  • When referencing file paths, show both Windows (C:\...) and Linux (/home/...) formats together.
  • Explicitly mention that all operations can be performed from Linux/macOS using Azure CLI or Cloud Shell, and provide links to relevant setup guides.
  • Avoid assuming the user is on Windows or using PowerShell by default; use neutral language and tool-agnostic instructions where possible.
  • Add a section at the beginning explaining tool options (PowerShell, Azure CLI, Cloud Shell) and their cross-platform availability.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell (Windows-centric) command-line examples for subscription registration, without offering equivalent Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash examples. The initial steps for provider registration use PowerShell cmdlets exclusively, which may disadvantage Linux or macOS users. The remainder of the documentation uses REST API examples, which are platform-neutral.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for all PowerShell commands, especially for subscription registration and provider feature registration steps.
  • Explicitly mention that both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI can be used, and provide guidance for users on Linux/macOS.
  • Where possible, provide Bash shell examples for REST API calls (e.g., using curl) to demonstrate cross-platform usage.
  • Review introductory sections to ensure that Windows tools or patterns are not presented as the default or only option.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses PowerShell scripts and cmdlets for automation, with no mention of Bash, Azure CLI, or cross-platform scripting alternatives. All automation examples and instructions are based on PowerShell, which is more commonly associated with Windows environments, and there is no guidance for users who may be working from Linux or macOS systems. The documentation also references Windows-centric tools and patterns (e.g., PowerShell runbooks) without acknowledging or providing parity for Linux-native approaches.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent examples using Azure CLI (az) commands and Bash scripts for automation tasks, alongside PowerShell.
  • Explicitly state that Azure Automation supports Python runbooks and provide a sample Python script for the same monitoring workflow.
  • Clarify whether the PowerShell scripts and modules used are compatible with PowerShell Core on Linux/macOS, and if so, provide installation and usage guidance for those platforms.
  • Include a section or note for Linux/macOS users, outlining any differences or additional steps required to achieve the same result.
  • Where possible, use cross-platform tools and language in instructions (e.g., refer to 'terminal' instead of 'PowerShell console', and avoid assuming a Windows environment).

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses Azure PowerShell cmdlets for all configuration, verification, and management steps, with no mention of Azure CLI, Bash, or cross-platform alternatives. All code examples and instructions assume the use of PowerShell, which is traditionally associated with Windows environments, and there is no guidance for users on Linux or macOS platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for each PowerShell example, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Add a section or notes explaining how to perform these tasks in Bash or from the Azure Cloud Shell using Bash.
  • Clarify that Azure PowerShell can be used on Linux/macOS, but still offer CLI alternatives for users who prefer native tools.
  • Ensure that prerequisites and setup instructions include both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI installation and authentication steps.
  • Review all references to PowerShell to ensure they are balanced with cross-platform alternatives, and update headings/sections to reflect multi-platform support.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell commands for onboarding to ExpressRoute Direct, with no equivalent Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash examples. This assumes a Windows or PowerShell-centric workflow, potentially excluding Linux and macOS users. No mention is made of Linux-native tools or alternative onboarding methods.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell for all onboarding and management steps.
  • Explicitly state that both Windows and Linux/macOS users can manage ExpressRoute Direct, and provide guidance for each platform.
  • Where possible, include Bash shell examples for common tasks.
  • Avoid referencing only Windows-specific tools or workflows; ensure parity in instructions and tooling.
  • Consider a 'Choose your platform' section at the start of procedural steps, linking to both PowerShell and CLI/Bash instructions.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific management APIs (with a link to a Windows documentation page), mentioning PowerShell as the only example for ExpressRoute routing configuration, and omitting any Linux or cross-platform command-line examples or tools. There are no references to Linux-native tools or Azure CLI, and no examples are provided for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Include Azure CLI examples alongside or instead of PowerShell for configuration tasks, such as creating and modifying ExpressRoute circuits and routing filters.
  • Reference cross-platform management APIs and documentation, not just Windows-specific endpoints.
  • Explicitly mention that management and configuration can be performed from Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide relevant examples.
  • Add links to Linux and cross-platform tooling documentation (e.g., Azure CLI, REST API usage) for ExpressRoute.
  • Ensure that all procedural steps and code snippets are platform-agnostic or have both Windows and Linux variants.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias primarily in the 'Before you begin' section, where only Azure PowerShell commands are provided for the required subscription enrollment step, with no equivalent Azure CLI or cross-platform instructions. Additionally, file path examples (e.g., C:\Users\SampleUser\Downloads\LOA.pdf) use Windows conventions without mentioning Linux alternatives. The initial enrollment step is Windows-first and lacks Linux parity, potentially blocking Linux/macOS users from following the guide end-to-end.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI equivalents for all PowerShell commands, especially for the subscription enrollment step, or clarify if the step is only possible in PowerShell.
  • Include Linux/macOS file path examples (e.g., ~/Downloads/LOA.pdf) alongside Windows paths when specifying output destinations.
  • Add notes or links for cross-platform users on how to accomplish prerequisite steps using CLI or REST if PowerShell is unavoidable.
  • Review all examples and ensure that none assume a Windows environment by default; offer parity for Linux/macOS users throughout.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation page primarily describes configuration using the Azure portal, which is platform-agnostic, but it specifically mentions Azure PowerShell as the only CLI tool in the prerequisites, with no mention of Azure CLI or Bash alternatives. This suggests a Windows-first and PowerShell-heavy bias, as Linux users are more likely to use Azure CLI or Bash scripting. No Linux-specific tools or instructions are provided.
Recommendations:
  • In the 'Before you begin' section, mention both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI as supported tools for local scripting, and provide installation links for both.
  • Wherever PowerShell is referenced, add equivalent Azure CLI (az) commands or guidance, especially for users on Linux or macOS.
  • Explicitly state that all portal-based steps are cross-platform, but provide links to CLI-based documentation for both PowerShell and Azure CLI.
  • Consider adding a 'Command-line configuration' section with both PowerShell and Azure CLI examples for users who prefer scripting or automation.
  • Review all notes and prerequisites to ensure they do not assume a Windows environment or PowerShell as the default.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by listing PowerShell as a primary method for upgrading circuit bandwidth, and mentioning it before Azure CLI. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, and the documentation does not clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform or provide Bash/Linux shell examples.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and works on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Provide example commands for both PowerShell and Bash (using Azure CLI) to ensure Linux users are equally supported.
  • List Azure CLI before PowerShell to avoid the impression that Windows tools are preferred.
  • Add a note or section highlighting Linux/macOS compatibility and any OS-specific considerations.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for gateway subnet creation, referencing PowerShell and REST API resources exclusively, and omitting any Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Linux-native command examples. The focus on PowerShell cmdlets and lack of parity with CLI or Bash scripting may disadvantage Linux and macOS users.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell for all command-line operations, especially for gateway subnet creation.
  • Include references and links to Azure CLI documentation and syntax in the 'REST APIs and PowerShell cmdlets' section.
  • Explicitly mention that all operations can be performed from Linux, macOS, or Windows using Azure CLI.
  • Where possible, provide Bash script equivalents for common tasks.
  • Reorder examples or provide both PowerShell and CLI examples together, rather than PowerShell only or first.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page is heavily biased towards Windows and PowerShell usage. All step-by-step examples and code blocks use Azure PowerShell exclusively, with no equivalent Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash examples provided inline. The instructions and workflow assume the use of PowerShell, which is traditionally associated with Windows, and there is no mention of Linux or macOS-specific guidance. While links to Azure CLI and REST API deployment methods are provided, they are secondary and not integrated into the main instructional flow.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Azure CLI (az) examples alongside PowerShell scripts for all deployment and deletion steps.
  • Include explicit instructions or code blocks for Bash/shell environments to ensure Linux and macOS users are equally supported.
  • Reorganize the documentation to present both PowerShell and CLI methods equally, or allow users to select their preferred environment at the top of the page.
  • Clarify that Azure Cloud Shell supports both PowerShell and Bash, and show how to choose between them.
  • Avoid language that assumes the user is on Windows or using PowerShell by default; instead, use neutral, cross-platform phrasing.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by providing detailed PowerShell scripts and automation for Windows, referencing Windows-specific tools (such as Control Panel and Windows Firewall), and presenting Windows procedures and scripts before or more prominently than Linux equivalents. Linux instructions are present but are less automated, require manual steps, and are less detailed. There are also references to Windows-specific verification steps without Linux parity.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent automated scripts for Linux (e.g., a bash script to open firewall ports and configure the agent, similar to the provided PowerShell script for Windows).
  • Include Linux verification steps (such as commands to check agent status and connectivity) alongside the Windows Control Panel instructions.
  • Present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel or in clearly separated, equally detailed sections to avoid the perception of Windows-first bias.
  • Reference Linux tools and configuration files with the same level of detail as Windows tools (e.g., mention systemd, firewalld/iptables, and log file locations for Linux).
  • Where possible, provide cross-platform CLI examples (such as using Azure CLI) instead of only PowerShell.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Reference Windows Services First
Summary:
The documentation is generally platform-neutral and focuses on network routing concepts, but there are minor instances of Windows bias. Specifically, there is a reference to Windows VM license activation in the context of default route advertisement, and the list of Microsoft 365 services highlights Windows-centric products (Exchange, SharePoint, Skype for Business, Teams) before mentioning others. There are no PowerShell-heavy sections, Windows-only tools, or missing Linux examples, but the only explicit OS reference is to Windows.
Recommendations:
  • When mentioning issues like VM license activation, clarify that similar issues may affect Linux VMs (e.g., Azure Linux VM activation or cloud-init scenarios) if applicable, or explicitly state if the issue is Windows-only.
  • If referencing troubleshooting or configuration for VM activation, provide links or notes for both Windows and Linux VM scenarios.
  • When listing Microsoft 365 services, consider a more neutral phrasing or include a broader range of services to avoid the appearance of Windows-first bias.
  • Continue to avoid OS-specific tooling (such as PowerShell or Windows command-line) unless parity examples for Linux (Bash, CLI) are also provided.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing PowerShell for command-line migration and subnet management tasks, with no mention of Azure CLI or Bash/Linux alternatives. All automation and scripting guidance is provided only via PowerShell, which is traditionally associated with Windows environments. There are no examples or instructions for Linux users or those preferring cross-platform tools.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell for all migration and subnet management tasks.
  • Explicitly mention that PowerShell can be used on Linux/macOS, or clarify if any steps are Windows-only.
  • Include Bash or shell script equivalents where appropriate, or link to cross-platform documentation.
  • Reorder guidance so that cross-platform tools (Azure CLI) are mentioned before or alongside PowerShell.
  • Add a section or note for Linux/macOS users, outlining supported tools and any differences in procedure.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for deployment, validation, and cleanup steps. However, PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and in some sections, PowerShell is presented immediately after CLI without clarification that PowerShell is primarily a Windows tool. There are no explicit Linux-specific instructions or mentions of Linux shell environments, and no guidance for users on macOS or Linux regarding PowerShell Core compatibility.
Recommendations:
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and works natively on Windows, Linux, and macOS, while PowerShell examples are for users who prefer or require PowerShell (and mention PowerShell Core for cross-platform use).
  • Consider presenting Azure CLI examples first, as it is the most universally applicable across platforms.
  • Add a note or section for Linux/macOS users, confirming that all CLI commands work in Bash and other Unix shells.
  • If PowerShell is included, specify that it is available cross-platform as PowerShell Core, and provide installation links or references for non-Windows users.
  • Explicitly state that no Windows-only tools or steps are required, and that the process is fully supported on Linux and macOS.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation is heavily biased toward Windows and PowerShell usage. All configuration steps and code samples are provided exclusively using Azure PowerShell cmdlets, with explicit references to installing PowerShell modules and using Windows-style file paths (e.g., 'C:\NetworkConfig.xml'). There are no examples or instructions for performing these tasks using Azure CLI, Bash, or other cross-platform tools. The documentation does not mention or provide parity for Linux or macOS users, nor does it reference alternative tooling or scripting environments.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for all PowerShell cmdlets, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Include notes or sections for Linux/macOS users, such as how to install and use Azure CLI and where to store configuration files (e.g., using '/home/user/NetworkConfig.xml' paths).
  • Where file paths are referenced, show both Windows and Linux/macOS path formats.
  • Add a table or selector at the top of the article allowing users to choose between PowerShell and Azure CLI (or Bash) instructions.
  • Explicitly state that the instructions are applicable on Windows, and provide links or guidance for users on other platforms.
  • Review all referenced scripts and tools to ensure they are available and supported on non-Windows platforms.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell command examples for all CLI-based verification and troubleshooting steps. There are no equivalent examples using Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash scripting. Additionally, the recommended network testing tool is PsPing, which is a Windows-only Sysinternals utility, with no mention of Linux alternatives. No Linux-native commands or tools are referenced, and the documentation does not address how Linux users can perform the same tasks.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside all PowerShell examples to ensure cross-platform usability.
  • Include Linux-native network testing tools (such as hping3, nping, or standard ping/traceroute) as alternatives to PsPing for connectivity testing.
  • Explicitly mention that all PowerShell commands can be run in Azure Cloud Shell, which is available on all platforms, but also show Bash/Azure CLI syntax.
  • Where possible, add troubleshooting steps or command examples that use common Linux networking tools (e.g., ip, ifconfig, arp, route, netstat) for validating ARP, BGP, and routing.
  • Structure sections so that cross-platform or platform-neutral tools are presented first, or at least in parallel with Windows-specific tools.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation is heavily biased towards Windows by exclusively using PowerShell cmdlets for all configuration, management, and viewing tasks. There are no examples or instructions for Linux users, such as Azure CLI or Bash equivalents. The only tooling mentioned is PowerShell, which is traditionally a Windows-centric tool, though it is now cross-platform. No Linux-native patterns or commands are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for each PowerShell cmdlet shown, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux.
  • Include a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, clarifying how to perform these tasks without PowerShell.
  • Where possible, provide Bash script examples or references to REST API usage for advanced users.
  • Reorganize the documentation to present both PowerShell and Azure CLI options side-by-side, or allow users to select their preferred platform at the top of the article.
  • Explicitly state that PowerShell Core is available on Linux/macOS, if PowerShell must be used, and provide installation instructions for those platforms.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for Azure-side configuration and validation, referencing the Azure portal (which is platform-agnostic but often used in Windows contexts), and omitting Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash examples. All device configuration examples are for Cisco IOS/CSR, with no Linux-based VPN device (e.g., strongSwan, libreswan) configuration or validation commands. The workflow and validation steps consistently present PowerShell commands first or exclusively, with no parity for Linux administrators.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside all Azure PowerShell commands for resource creation, configuration, and validation.
  • Include Linux-based VPN device configuration examples (e.g., strongSwan, libreswan) in addition to Cisco IOS/CSR examples, especially for on-premises device setup and tunnel validation.
  • When referencing the Azure portal, clarify its cross-platform nature and provide CLI alternatives where possible.
  • Present both PowerShell and CLI/Bash commands in parallel, or at least link to equivalent Linux/CLI documentation.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed from Linux/macOS environments using Azure CLI, and provide references or links to those instructions.
  • Add validation and troubleshooting steps using Linux-native tools (e.g., ipsec status, journalctl, tcpdump) for tunnel and BGP session checks.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by providing all Azure-side command-line examples exclusively in PowerShell, with no Bash, Azure CLI, or Linux-native equivalents. Additionally, network validation and failover testing examples use Windows tools (tracert) and Windows-style command prompts, with no mention of Linux alternatives (e.g., traceroute). This prioritizes Windows environments and omits guidance for users on Linux or cross-platform systems.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI (az) command equivalents for all PowerShell examples, especially for route validation and ExpressRoute circuit management.
  • Include Linux-native command examples (e.g., traceroute instead of tracert) alongside Windows examples when demonstrating network validation from on-premises servers.
  • Explicitly mention that the procedures can be performed from both Windows and Linux environments, and provide guidance or links for Linux users.
  • Where screenshots or sample outputs are shown from Windows terminals, consider adding corresponding Linux/Bash terminal examples.
  • Review the documentation for any other Windows-centric terminology or assumptions, and ensure Linux parity throughout.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation lists PowerShell as a primary method for upgrading circuit bandwidth, and mentions it before Azure CLI, which is more cross-platform and Linux-friendly. There are no explicit Linux or Bash examples, and the focus on PowerShell may suggest a Windows-centric approach.
Recommendations:
  • Present Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Include explicit Bash/Linux shell command examples where relevant, especially for common administrative tasks.
  • Clarify that all operations can be performed from Linux, macOS, or Windows, and provide parity in step-by-step instructions for each platform.
  • Avoid implying PowerShell is the default or preferred method unless there is a technical reason.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page references Azure PowerShell specifically as a configuration method for ExpressRoute FastPath, without mentioning or providing parity for Linux/CLI-based alternatives. The 'Next steps' section lists PowerShell before any cross-platform tools, and there are no explicit examples or guidance for Linux users (e.g., Azure CLI or Bash scripting). This creates a Windows-first impression and lacks Linux parity.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit instructions and examples for configuring ExpressRoute FastPath using Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux.
  • In the 'Next steps' section, list Azure CLI and PowerShell options together, or list CLI first to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Wherever PowerShell is mentioned, provide equivalent Bash or Azure CLI commands.
  • Include notes or links for Linux/macOS users to ensure they can follow along without needing Windows-specific tools.
  • Review all configuration steps and ensure that none are exclusive to Windows or PowerShell, and that Linux users are not left out.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page does not provide any platform-specific configuration examples or tooling references (Windows or Linux). However, the only configuration guidance links to the Azure portal, with no mention of CLI, PowerShell, or Linux-based tools. This omission may disadvantage Linux users who prefer command-line or automation-based workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Add examples for configuring BGP communities using Azure CLI and/or Azure PowerShell, ensuring both Windows and Linux users are supported.
  • Include references or links to documentation for automating BGP community configuration via scripts (e.g., Bash for Linux, PowerShell for Windows).
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal is cross-platform, but also provide parity for users who prefer non-GUI approaches.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell (Windows-centric) command-line examples for subscription registration, without offering equivalent Azure CLI or REST-based examples that are cross-platform. The initial setup steps assume the use of PowerShell, which is most commonly used on Windows, and there is no mention of Linux or macOS workflows. All other API interactions are shown as REST calls, which are platform-neutral, but the critical first step (provider registration) lacks Linux parity.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples for subscription registration and provider feature registration, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Explicitly mention that the REST API and Azure CLI can be used from any OS, and provide equivalent commands for each step where possible.
  • Consider reordering or presenting Azure CLI and REST examples before or alongside PowerShell to avoid the impression of Windows-first workflows.
  • Include a note or section addressing cross-platform usage, clarifying that all API operations can be performed from Linux, macOS, or Windows.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation is heavily biased towards Windows and PowerShell. All examples and instructions use Windows PowerShell cmdlets, and there is no mention of Linux or cross-platform alternatives. The prerequisites specifically require the Windows PowerShell module, and there are no Bash, Azure CLI, or Linux-native instructions or examples. This makes the documentation less accessible to users on Linux or macOS platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent instructions and examples using Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and works on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Include Bash shell examples for retrieving ARP tables or interacting with Azure resources.
  • Mention and link to Linux/macOS installation guides for Azure CLI or other relevant tools.
  • Clearly indicate which steps are Windows-specific and provide parity for non-Windows users.
  • Review prerequisites to ensure they are not Windows-exclusive unless absolutely necessary, and offer alternatives where possible.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses the Azure Portal (GUI) for all configuration steps and does not provide any command-line examples. There are no references to Windows-specific tools or PowerShell, but there is also a complete absence of CLI-based instructions (such as Azure CLI or Azure PowerShell), which are commonly used on both Windows and Linux. This omission can disadvantage Linux users who prefer or require command-line automation, as the Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used in Linux environments.
Recommendations:
  • Add parallel instructions using the Azure CLI for each major step (e.g., creating the ExpressRoute circuit, enabling private peering, creating the virtual network gateway, and linking resources).
  • Ensure that all CLI examples are tested and work on both Windows and Linux shells (e.g., Bash).
  • If referencing PowerShell, always provide Azure CLI equivalents and present them either before or alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure CLI is available cross-platform and provide installation links for Linux users.
  • Consider including automation scripts or templates (e.g., ARM, Bicep, Terraform) that are platform-agnostic.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for command-line configuration, with no mention of Azure CLI or Bash equivalents that are commonly used on Linux and macOS. The PowerShell steps are presented as the sole scripting option, and the documentation references Windows-centric tools and patterns without offering Linux alternatives or parity.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell for all configuration steps.
  • Explicitly mention that the steps can be performed from any OS using Azure CLI or Cloud Shell, not just from Windows/PowerShell.
  • Include Bash script examples or note cross-platform compatibility where possible.
  • Reorder or present PowerShell and CLI steps in parallel, or provide a clear choice for users based on their platform.
  • Review included content (INCLUDE files) to ensure Linux and cross-platform instructions are present.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively showing command-line examples using Windows file paths (e.g., C:\Users\...), and referencing the ARMClient tool as if it is being run from a Windows environment. There are no Linux or cross-platform shell examples, and no mention of Linux-compatible tools or usage patterns. The documentation assumes a Windows user context throughout, which may hinder Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Linux/macOS shell examples (e.g., using bash/zsh) alongside Windows command-line examples.
  • Clarify whether ARMClient is available and supported on Linux/macOS, and provide installation and usage instructions for those platforms if so.
  • Use platform-neutral file paths in documentation, or show both Windows and Linux path examples where relevant.
  • Explicitly mention that the API can be accessed from any OS, and provide curl or HTTPie examples for REST API calls, which are available on all platforms.
  • Avoid assuming a Windows user context in narrative or examples; strive for parity in tool recommendations and usage instructions.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for gateway subnet creation, referencing PowerShell cmdlets and REST APIs as primary configuration tools, and omitting equivalent Azure CLI (cross-platform) or ARM template examples. There are no Linux-native or cross-platform command examples, and PowerShell is presented as the default automation method.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell for all configuration steps, especially for gateway subnet creation.
  • Include ARM template snippets or Bicep examples for users who prefer declarative infrastructure-as-code approaches.
  • Explicitly mention that all operations can be performed from any OS using Azure CLI, not just Windows/PowerShell.
  • Reorganize technical resources to list Azure CLI and REST API before or alongside PowerShell, emphasizing cross-platform options.
  • Where PowerShell is referenced, provide a parallel Azure CLI command block to ensure parity for Linux and macOS users.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell commands for onboarding to ExpressRoute Direct, with no equivalent Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash examples. The instructions and code snippets assume the use of PowerShell, which is traditionally associated with Windows environments, and there is no mention of how to perform these steps on Linux or macOS. This can make the onboarding process less accessible to users on non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell commands for all onboarding and configuration steps.
  • Clearly indicate that both PowerShell and CLI can be used, and provide guidance for users on Linux/macOS.
  • Where possible, provide Bash script examples or note any platform-specific differences.
  • Reorganize sections so that cross-platform tools (like Azure CLI) are mentioned before or alongside Windows-specific tools.
  • Include a note or table summarizing which tools/commands are available on which platforms (Windows, Linux, macOS).

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas. PowerShell is repeatedly mentioned as a primary or sole automation tool for managing ExpressRoute (e.g., 'PowerShell cmdlet', 'how-to-routefilter-powershell.md'), and REST API/CLI are mentioned but often after PowerShell. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, and no mention of Linux-native tools or shell environments. Where automation or scripting is referenced, Windows/PowerShell is prioritized or assumed. This may make it less accessible or less clear for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI examples alongside or before PowerShell examples, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • When referencing automation or scripting, mention both PowerShell and Bash/CLI options, and link to relevant documentation for both.
  • Avoid using 'PowerShell' as the default or only example in links and code samples (e.g., 'how-to-routefilter-powershell.md'); provide or link to equivalent Azure CLI or Bash guides.
  • Explicitly state that all management operations can be performed from Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide guidance for each.
  • Where screenshots or UI instructions are shown, ensure they are not Windows-specific unless necessary, or provide Linux/macOS equivalents if applicable.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-centric management APIs, linking to Windows documentation, and providing PowerShell as the only example for ExpressRoute routing configuration. There are no Linux or cross-platform CLI examples, and Windows tools and patterns are mentioned exclusively or before any Linux alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Include Azure CLI and/or Bash examples alongside or instead of PowerShell for ExpressRoute configuration tasks.
  • Reference cross-platform management APIs and documentation, not just Windows-specific ones.
  • Provide links and examples for Linux-based management and automation tools (e.g., Azure CLI, REST API usage from Bash).
  • Ensure that documentation for ExpressRoute routing and circuit management covers both Windows and Linux environments equally.
  • Avoid linking only to Windows documentation (such as previous-versions/windows/mt844538) and instead use platform-neutral or cross-platform Azure docs.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing PowerShell-based instructions and references, with no mention of Linux, Bash, or cross-platform CLI alternatives. The only non-portal automation example referenced is PowerShell, and the structure and links present PowerShell before any Linux-friendly options. There are no Linux or Azure CLI examples or references, and no mention of Bash or cross-platform scripting.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI (az) instructions and links alongside or before PowerShell examples, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and works on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Ensure that all automation or scripting references include both PowerShell and Azure CLI options.
  • Rephrase references such as '[PowerShell instructions]' to '[PowerShell or Azure CLI instructions]' and provide corresponding links.
  • Consider including a section or selector for Linux/macOS users, or clarify that the portal and Azure CLI are fully supported on all platforms.
  • Audit all referenced articles to ensure Linux parity in examples and instructions.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only PowerShell commands for gateway configuration and explicitly instructing users to use PowerShell for certain steps. There are no CLI or Linux-native command examples, and no mention of cross-platform tools like Azure CLI. This may hinder Linux or macOS users who do not have access to PowerShell or prefer other tooling.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) commands for all PowerShell examples, especially for gateway configuration and management steps.
  • Mention that PowerShell is available cross-platform, but clarify that Azure CLI is often preferred on Linux/macOS.
  • Wherever a command-line example is given, present both PowerShell and Azure CLI versions, or link to cross-platform documentation.
  • Review the documentation for other implicit Windows-first assumptions, such as screenshots or terminology, and ensure parity for Linux/macOS users.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows/Powershell bias. The primary example for deploying an ExpressRoute circuit using an ARM template is provided only in Azure PowerShell, with no equivalent Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash example. Instructions and workflow steps are written specifically for PowerShell users, and the guidance assumes use of the Azure Cloud Shell in PowerShell mode. While there is a brief mention of Azure CLI and REST API as alternative deployment methods, no concrete CLI or Bash examples are provided. This prioritization of PowerShell and lack of Linux-native or cross-platform command examples may hinder accessibility for Linux and macOS users.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI (az) examples for all PowerShell scripts, especially for deploying and deleting ExpressRoute circuits.
  • Include Bash shell instructions and examples where appropriate, or clarify that Azure Cloud Shell supports both Bash and PowerShell.
  • Present CLI and PowerShell examples side-by-side or in tabs, ensuring neither platform is prioritized over the other.
  • Explicitly state that all operations can be performed from Linux/macOS using Azure CLI, and provide links to relevant CLI documentation.
  • Review and update workflow steps to be platform-neutral, avoiding assumptions about the user's operating system or shell.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation is heavily biased towards Windows environments, specifically PowerShell. All configuration steps and code samples use Azure PowerShell cmdlets, with no mention of Azure CLI, Bash, or Linux-native tools. File paths and command syntax are Windows-centric (e.g., C:\NetworkConfig.xml). There are no examples or guidance for users on Linux or macOS platforms, and the installation instructions focus solely on PowerShell modules.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI examples for all PowerShell commands, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Include Linux/macOS file path examples (e.g., /home/user/NetworkConfig.xml) alongside Windows paths.
  • Add a section or callouts for users on Linux/macOS, including installation instructions for Azure CLI and/or PowerShell Core on those platforms.
  • Where possible, use platform-agnostic language and tools, or clearly indicate when a step is Windows-specific.
  • Consider reordering or parallelizing instructions so that Linux/macOS methods are presented alongside Windows methods, rather than Windows-first.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation is heavily biased toward Windows and PowerShell usage. All command-line examples use Azure PowerShell cmdlets, and file paths are Windows-centric (e.g., C:\Users\SampleUser\Downloads). There is only a brief mention of Cloud Shell with a Linux-style path, but no Bash, Azure CLI, or Linux-native examples are provided. Windows tools and conventions are assumed throughout, and Linux alternatives are not discussed.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for all operations, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Include Linux/macOS file path examples alongside Windows paths, especially when referencing file downloads or script outputs.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure PowerShell can be used on Linux/macOS, or provide installation instructions for non-Windows users.
  • Structure sections so that cross-platform or Linux-native approaches (e.g., Azure CLI, Bash) are presented alongside or before Windows/PowerShell examples.
  • Add notes or links to documentation for using Cloud Shell, Bash, or other cross-platform tools to perform the same tasks.
  • Where possible, avoid Windows-specific terminology or clarify when a step is platform-agnostic.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias primarily in the 'Before you begin' section, where Azure PowerShell is required for subscription enrollment and registration, with no equivalent Azure CLI or Linux-native instructions provided. Additionally, file path examples (e.g., for LOA document download) use Windows-style paths without Linux alternatives. The rest of the guide uses Azure CLI, which is cross-platform, but the initial steps and some examples assume a Windows environment.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI commands for subscription enrollment and provider feature registration, or explicitly state if these steps can only be performed via PowerShell.
  • Include Linux/macOS file path examples (e.g., '~/Downloads/LOA.pdf') alongside Windows paths when specifying output destinations.
  • If PowerShell is required for certain steps, clarify this limitation and offer guidance for Linux users (e.g., using Azure Cloud Shell or installing PowerShell Core on Linux).
  • Review all command and output examples to ensure they are platform-agnostic or provide platform-specific variants where necessary.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page exclusively uses Azure PowerShell cmdlets and assumes the reader is using PowerShell, which is traditionally a Windows-centric tool. There are no examples or guidance for users on Linux or macOS, such as using Azure CLI, Bash, or cross-platform scripting. All setup and configuration steps are shown with PowerShell, and there is no mention of Linux-native tools or alternative workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for all PowerShell cmdlets, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed on Linux/macOS using Azure CLI or PowerShell Core, and provide instructions for installing and using these tools on non-Windows systems.
  • Include Bash script examples or references for common tasks, especially for secret management and resource creation.
  • Add a section or callouts for Linux users, highlighting any differences or additional considerations (e.g., authentication, environment setup).
  • Avoid assuming the use of Windows or PowerShell as the default; present cross-platform options side-by-side or in parallel sections.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias by referencing Azure PowerShell as a prerequisite for local command-line configuration, without mentioning Azure CLI or Bash alternatives. The only command-line tool referenced is Azure PowerShell, which is most commonly associated with Windows environments. No Linux-specific tools, shell instructions, or parity examples are provided. However, the main configuration flow is via the Azure portal, which is cross-platform.
Recommendations:
  • Mention Azure CLI as an alternative to Azure PowerShell for users on Linux or macOS.
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI commands or instructions for all PowerShell references.
  • Update the 'Before you begin' section to include both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI as supported local tools.
  • Clarify that the Azure portal is accessible from any OS, and provide links to cross-platform command-line documentation.
  • If screenshots or examples reference Windows-specific UI or paths, consider including notes or images from Linux/macOS environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses Azure PowerShell cmdlets for all configuration steps, with no mention of Azure CLI, Bash, or cross-platform alternatives. All examples and instructions assume the use of PowerShell, which is traditionally associated with Windows environments, and there is no guidance for users on Linux or macOS. The prerequisites and setup sections also reference Azure PowerShell specifically, reinforcing a Windows-centric approach.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for all configuration steps, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Include a section or notes on how to perform these tasks using Bash or in a Linux/macOS environment, clarifying any differences or prerequisites.
  • Mention that Azure PowerShell can be used on Linux and macOS, but also highlight the availability and parity of Azure CLI.
  • Reorganize the documentation so that cross-platform tools (like Azure CLI) are presented before or alongside PowerShell, rather than only after or not at all.
  • Add links to official Azure CLI documentation for ExpressRoute where appropriate.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Azure PowerShell commands as a prerequisite for ExpressRoute Direct enrollment, without mentioning Azure CLI or Bash alternatives. There are no Linux-specific instructions or parity in tooling examples, and the only command-line tooling mentioned is PowerShell, which is traditionally associated with Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Wherever Azure PowerShell is mentioned, also provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) commands and Bash examples, or at least reference that these alternatives exist.
  • Explicitly state that both Windows and Linux users can manage ExpressRoute resources, and link to cross-platform tooling documentation.
  • Add a section or note clarifying that all required steps can be performed from Linux/macOS via Azure CLI, and provide links to relevant guides.
  • Review all command references and ensure that Linux and cross-platform options are presented equally and not as an afterthought.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page exclusively uses PowerShell cmdlets for all configuration, management, and status-checking examples, with no mention or examples of Azure CLI, Bash, or cross-platform tools. There are explicit instructions to download PowerShell cmdlets, and no Linux-native or cross-platform alternatives are provided. This creates a strong Windows/PowerShell bias and limits accessibility for Linux or macOS users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI examples for all configuration, management, and status-checking tasks, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Include a section or callout at the beginning of the article explaining that all tasks can be performed using Azure CLI, with a link to the relevant CLI documentation.
  • Where PowerShell-specific instructions are given (such as installing cmdlets), provide parallel instructions for installing and using Azure CLI.
  • Consider restructuring the article or adding tabs/switchers to allow users to select their preferred tool (PowerShell or Azure CLI), ensuring parity in instructions and examples.
  • Explicitly mention that PowerShell Core is available cross-platform, if relevant, and provide installation guidance for non-Windows users if PowerShell must be used.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias by exclusively referencing Azure PowerShell modules and providing only PowerShell command examples for migration tasks. There is no mention of Azure CLI or Bash equivalents, which are commonly used on Linux and macOS platforms. The guidance assumes the use of Windows tools and patterns, and does not address cross-platform scenarios or provide parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Include Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell for all migration steps, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Explicitly mention that the migration can be performed from any OS using Azure CLI, not just from Windows with PowerShell.
  • Provide links to Azure CLI installation and usage documentation, similar to the PowerShell references.
  • Where PowerShell modules are referenced, also reference Azure CLI equivalents and their documentation.
  • Review all code snippets and ensure that for every PowerShell example, a CLI/Bash example is also provided.
  • Avoid language that assumes the user is on Windows or using Windows-specific tools.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows-first bias by linking only to guidance for configuring DSCP markings on Windows 10 clients, with no mention of Linux or cross-platform configuration steps. There are no examples or references for Linux tools or methods to set QoS/DSCP markings, which may leave Linux administrators without clear guidance.
Recommendations:
  • Include references or links to documentation on configuring DSCP markings and QoS policies on Linux systems (e.g., using iptables, tc, or systemd-networkd).
  • Provide example commands or configuration snippets for both Windows and Linux platforms.
  • Explicitly mention that the guidance applies to both Windows and Linux clients, and clarify any platform-specific differences.
  • Add a section or note addressing how to achieve equivalent QoS configuration on Linux endpoints.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First
Summary:
The documentation is generally platform-neutral, focusing on network concepts and configuration requirements. However, there is a notable instance of Windows bias: in the section on advertising default routes, only Windows VM license activation is mentioned as being affected, with a workaround link specifically for Windows (KMS activation). There are no Linux-specific examples, issues, or workarounds discussed, nor are Linux tools or patterns referenced.
Recommendations:
  • When discussing issues that affect VM license activation due to routing (such as KMS for Windows), also mention whether there are equivalent concerns for Linux VMs (e.g., activation, repository access, or other licensing mechanisms).
  • If there are Linux-specific routing or activation considerations (such as access to package repositories or cloud-init endpoints), include them alongside Windows examples.
  • Where possible, provide parity in troubleshooting or workaround documentation for both Windows and Linux VM scenarios.
  • Explicitly state if a limitation or workaround is only relevant to Windows, and clarify that Linux VMs are unaffected, if that is the case.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exclusively provides instructions and examples using PowerShell cmdlets for retrieving ARP tables on Azure ExpressRoute circuits. There are no examples or guidance for performing equivalent operations using Azure CLI, Bash, or other cross-platform tools. The prerequisites specifically require the Azure PowerShell module, and all code samples are in PowerShell. There is no mention of Linux or macOS workflows, nor are alternative tools or commands referenced.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent instructions and examples using Azure CLI (az) commands, which are cross-platform and work on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Explicitly mention that the steps can be performed from any OS using Azure CLI, and provide installation links for both PowerShell and CLI.
  • Include Bash or shell script examples where appropriate, especially for common troubleshooting or data retrieval tasks.
  • Clarify any limitations or differences in output or capabilities between PowerShell and CLI, if applicable.
  • Add a section or note for Linux/macOS users, outlining the recommended approach for retrieving ARP tables and interacting with ExpressRoute resources.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a strong Windows bias throughout. All code examples are in PowerShell, and the workflow is centered around the AzureCT PowerShell module, which is only available for Windows. The instructions for installing and running tools (iPerf, PSPing) are Windows-centric, including references to Windows Firewall and installation paths (e.g., C:\ACTTools). There is no step-by-step guidance or command-line examples for Linux users, and Linux is only mentioned passively as a possible remote host. Even in the test setup and results, only Windows Server is used. The documentation does not provide Linux equivalents for the PowerShell-based workflow, nor does it mention or demonstrate how to perform equivalent tests on Linux systems.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux instructions and examples for each step, including how to install and use iPerf and PSPing (or Linux alternatives) on Linux hosts.
  • Include bash or shell command examples for Linux users, alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Document how to perform link performance tests between two Linux hosts, or between Windows and Linux, without requiring the AzureCT PowerShell module.
  • Clarify which parts of the workflow are Windows-only and offer alternative workflows for Linux environments.
  • Include sample output from Linux command-line tools to help Linux users interpret their results.
  • Mention Linux firewall configuration (e.g., ufw, firewalld, iptables) where Windows Firewall is discussed.
  • In test setup and results, include scenarios using Linux VMs and servers, not just Windows Server.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation references PowerShell and the Azure portal as primary verification and configuration methods, with CLI mentioned only as an afterthought. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, and the workflow implicitly assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tools and patterns.
Recommendations:
  • Include explicit Azure CLI examples for all verification and configuration steps, especially for circuit and peering state checks.
  • When listing tools or methods (e.g., 'Verify provisioning using PowerShell, the Azure portal, or CLI'), mention CLI first or equally, and clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform.
  • Add Linux shell (bash) command examples where appropriate, especially for common tasks such as querying circuit status.
  • Provide links to both PowerShell and Azure CLI documentation for each relevant step.
  • Review for any other Windows-centric terminology or assumptions and ensure parity for Linux and macOS users.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by listing PowerShell migration instructions as the only command-line example in the 'Next steps' section, without mentioning Azure CLI or Bash alternatives. There are no Linux-specific tools, patterns, or examples provided, and PowerShell is referenced before any cross-platform options. This may make the documentation less accessible for Linux or cross-platform users.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI (az) examples and links alongside PowerShell instructions for all migration and troubleshooting tasks.
  • In the 'Next steps' section, include a link to a Linux/Bash/Azure CLI migration guide, or combine PowerShell and Azure CLI instructions in a unified guide.
  • Ensure that all command-line instructions are presented in both PowerShell and Azure CLI formats, with equal prominence.
  • Explicitly mention that migration can be performed from Linux, macOS, or Windows environments using Azure CLI.
  • Review the documentation for any implicit assumptions about the user's operating system and clarify cross-platform compatibility where relevant.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing PowerShell for command-line migration steps and subnet management, with no mention of Azure CLI or Bash/Linux alternatives. This focus on PowerShell and omission of cross-platform tools may hinder Linux or macOS users seeking parity in migration guidance.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell instructions for all migration and subnet management tasks.
  • Explicitly mention that PowerShell examples are also available on Linux and macOS, or clarify when features are Windows-only.
  • Include Bash or shell script snippets where appropriate, especially for validation and monitoring steps.
  • Ensure that all references to tooling (e.g., 'supported only via PowerShell') are accompanied by notes on CLI support status and roadmap, or links to relevant GitHub issues/feature requests.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, summarizing supported cross-platform tools and any known limitations.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by providing detailed PowerShell scripts and automation for Windows users, while Linux instructions are manual and less automated. Windows tools and workflows (such as PowerShell scripts for firewall configuration) are mentioned first and in more detail, with Linux alternatives being less prominent or requiring manual intervention. There is also a lack of parity in verification steps and troubleshooting guidance for Linux compared to Windows.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent automation for Linux users, such as shell scripts to open firewall ports and configure agents, similar to the provided PowerShell script for Windows.
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, giving equal prominence and detail to both platforms.
  • Include verification and troubleshooting steps for Linux agents, not just for Windows (e.g., how to verify agent connectivity on Linux).
  • Avoid referencing Windows tools (like Control Panel) without Linux equivalents; provide Linux-specific guidance where appropriate.
  • Where possible, use cross-platform tools or commands, or clearly indicate when a step is platform-specific.
  • Consider including screenshots or examples for Linux agent installation and configuration, matching the level of detail given for Windows.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page exclusively describes how to view and configure alerts for Azure ExpressRoute circuit maintenance using the Azure portal GUI. There are no command-line examples or automation instructions provided for any platform, but notably, there is a lack of CLI, PowerShell, or Bash examples. This omission can be considered a bias of omission, as many Azure docs provide PowerShell or Windows-centric instructions without Linux equivalents. In this case, the absence of both PowerShell and Bash/CLI examples means Linux users do not have parity for automation or scripting.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples for viewing and configuring Service Health alerts, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • If PowerShell examples are added, ensure Bash/Azure CLI equivalents are also provided.
  • Include references to relevant REST API endpoints for advanced automation, with sample requests using curl or similar Linux-friendly tools.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed using the Azure CLI or REST API, and link to relevant documentation for those workflows.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively providing Azure PowerShell command examples for all CLI-based troubleshooting steps, without offering Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash equivalents. Additionally, the only explicit connectivity test tool recommended is PsPing, which is a Windows-only utility. There are no Linux-native or cross-platform alternatives mentioned for command-line operations or connectivity testing.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell for all resource and peering validation steps, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Include Bash or shell script examples for relevant troubleshooting steps, especially for Linux users.
  • Recommend cross-platform connectivity testing tools (such as hping3, nping, or standard ping/traceroute) in addition to or instead of PsPing, and provide example usage for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Explicitly mention that the PowerShell examples are for Windows and provide equivalent instructions for Linux/macOS users.
  • Where screenshots or portal instructions are given, clarify that the steps are platform-agnostic or note any differences for non-Windows users.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exclusively uses Azure PowerShell for all configuration steps, with no mention of Azure CLI, Bash, or Linux-native tools. All code samples are PowerShell scripts, and the workflow assumes familiarity with PowerShell, which is more common on Windows systems. There are no examples or guidance for users on Linux or macOS platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI examples for all PowerShell commands, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux and macOS.
  • Explicitly mention that the configuration can be performed from any OS using Azure CLI or Cloud Shell, not just PowerShell.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, guiding them to use Azure CLI or Bash scripts.
  • Where possible, use neutral terminology (e.g., 'command line' instead of 'PowerShell') and avoid assuming a Windows environment.
  • Ensure that all prerequisite and sign-in steps include both PowerShell and CLI alternatives.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation is heavily focused on PowerShell and Azure Automation runbooks using PowerShell scripts, with no mention of Linux alternatives or Bash/Azure CLI examples. All scripting and automation steps are described using PowerShell, and there is no guidance for users who may prefer or require Linux-based tooling or scripting environments. The documentation assumes familiarity with Azure PowerShell and does not provide parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent examples using Azure CLI (az) commands and Bash scripts for automation, especially for collecting ExpressRoute gateway route information.
  • Mention that Azure Automation supports Python runbooks and provide a sample Python script for the same monitoring task.
  • Clarify whether the described workflow is possible using Linux-based automation (e.g., using Azure CLI in Automation Accounts or Logic Apps) and provide instructions if so.
  • Add a section or note for Linux/macOS users, outlining how to perform the same steps without relying on PowerShell.
  • Where PowerShell modules are referenced, also reference Azure CLI equivalents and provide installation instructions for Linux environments.
  • Ensure that any prerequisites or 'before you begin' sections mention both PowerShell and CLI options, not just PowerShell.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing the PowerShell command `Get-AzExpressRouteCircuitStats` for traffic monitoring during failover validation, without providing equivalent CLI or Linux-native commands. No Linux or cross-platform command-line examples (such as Azure CLI or REST API) are given for monitoring or validation tasks, and the only tool mentioned for direct interaction is a Windows-centric one.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI examples (e.g., `az network express-route`) alongside or instead of PowerShell commands for monitoring and validation tasks.
  • Include REST API or cross-platform scripting options for users on Linux or macOS.
  • Explicitly mention that monitoring and management can be performed from any OS, and provide sample commands for both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux/macOS (Bash/Azure CLI).
  • Where possible, link to documentation or guides for Linux-based network monitoring and ExpressRoute management.
  • Avoid assuming the use of Windows tools by default; present cross-platform options first or in parallel.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for deploying the ARM template, referencing PowerShell-specific cmdlets and output, and omitting equivalent Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Bash examples. The instructions and screenshots are tailored to PowerShell users, with no mention or guidance for Linux or macOS users who may prefer or require CLI/Bash. While the text briefly mentions that Azure CLI and REST API are also supported, no examples or step-by-step instructions are given for those methods.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI (az) command examples alongside PowerShell for all deployment and cleanup steps.
  • Include Bash shell instructions or note that Azure CLI commands work cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS).
  • Add screenshots or output examples from Azure CLI to ensure parity.
  • Reorder or parallelize instructions so that CLI and PowerShell are presented equally, rather than PowerShell first or exclusively.
  • Explicitly mention that Cloud Shell supports both Bash and PowerShell, and guide users to choose their preferred shell.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for deployment, validation, and cleanup steps. However, PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and in some sections, PowerShell is presented immediately after CLI without clarifying platform parity or mentioning cross-platform PowerShell Core. There are no Linux- or macOS-specific instructions, nor is there any mention of Bash scripting or other Linux-native tools.
Recommendations:
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and can be used on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Mention that PowerShell Core is available cross-platform, or clarify if the instructions are specific to Windows PowerShell.
  • Consider providing Bash script examples or explicitly stating that the CLI commands work in Bash on Linux/macOS.
  • If referencing PowerShell, note its cross-platform availability and provide installation links for non-Windows users.
  • Add a note or section for Linux/macOS users to ensure they feel equally supported.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exclusively describes configuration using the Azure Portal GUI and does not provide any command-line examples. There is no mention of PowerShell, Azure CLI, or any OS-specific tools, but all instructions assume a graphical, browser-based workflow. This approach implicitly favors Windows environments, as Windows users are more likely to use the Azure Portal, while Linux users often prefer or require CLI-based instructions. There are no examples or references for Linux-native workflows (such as Azure CLI commands), nor is there any parity for headless or scriptable environments.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI command examples for enabling/disabling rate limiting, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • If PowerShell examples are added, ensure Azure CLI equivalents are always provided and presented first or side-by-side.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed via the Azure CLI or REST API, and provide links or examples for those methods.
  • Include a section or callout for users who prefer command-line or automated/scripted workflows, referencing both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Review screenshots and instructions to ensure they do not assume a Windows-only experience (e.g., avoid referencing Windows-specific UI elements or terminology).

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation provides detailed instructions exclusively for Azure PowerShell, which is primarily a Windows-centric tool, and does not offer equivalent CLI or Bash examples for Linux users. There is no mention of Azure CLI or cross-platform scripting, and the only command-line instructions are for PowerShell.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for resetting an ExpressRoute circuit, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Include Bash shell examples where appropriate, or clarify that the steps can be performed on any OS using Azure CLI.
  • Explicitly mention that PowerShell Core is available cross-platform if PowerShell must be used, and provide installation instructions for Linux/macOS.
  • Ensure that future documentation sections provide parity between Windows (PowerShell) and Linux (CLI/Bash) tooling.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for Azure-side configuration and validation, referencing the Azure portal (which is cross-platform but often Windows-centric in documentation), and omitting Azure CLI (cross-platform) or Linux-native command examples. All device-side configuration examples are for Cisco IOS-XE, with no mention of Linux-based VPN solutions (e.g., strongSwan, libreswan). There are no Linux/Unix command-line examples for validation or configuration, and PowerShell is consistently used for Azure operations.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples alongside or in place of PowerShell for all Azure-side configuration and validation steps, as Azure CLI is fully cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Include Linux-based VPN device configuration examples (e.g., strongSwan, libreswan) in addition to Cisco IOS-XE, to support organizations using Linux appliances.
  • When referencing how to obtain information (such as public IPs or connection status), provide both PowerShell and Azure CLI commands.
  • Ensure that validation and troubleshooting steps include Linux-native tools (e.g., ipsec status, journalctl, ip route) for parity with Cisco and Windows/PowerShell examples.
  • Where possible, avoid presenting PowerShell as the default or only automation/scripting option for Azure, and highlight the cross-platform nature of Azure CLI.