35
Total Pages
30
Linux-Friendly Pages
5
Pages with Bias
14.3%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

22 issues found
Showing 1-22 of 22 flagged pages
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides detailed instructions for creating an Azure HPC Cache using the Azure portal, Azure CLI, and Azure PowerShell. The PowerShell section is extensive and appears after the CLI section, but both are presented as primary options. There is a notable emphasis on PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) and the Azure portal (which is platform-neutral but often associated with Windows workflows). There are no Linux-specific examples, nor is there mention of Linux-native tools or shell environments (e.g., Bash). The CLI examples use Azure CLI, which is cross-platform, but there is no explicit guidance or examples for Linux users, such as using Bash or integrating with Linux automation workflows. The documentation also references Windows-centric patterns (PowerShell modules, cmdlets) and does not provide parity for Linux shell scripting or automation.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Bash shell examples for cache creation using Azure CLI, including variable usage and scripting patterns common on Linux.
  • Include notes or sections on running Azure CLI commands in Linux environments, such as installation, authentication, and environment setup.
  • Mention and provide examples for Linux automation tools (e.g., shell scripts, cron jobs) where relevant.
  • Balance PowerShell and CLI examples by ensuring Linux users see their workflows represented equally, possibly by presenting CLI/Bash examples before PowerShell.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is fully supported on Linux and macOS, and provide troubleshooting or environment-specific tips for those platforms.
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing detailed Azure PowerShell instructions and examples, including installation steps and usage notes, alongside Azure CLI examples. The PowerShell section is extensive and appears after the CLI section, but both are presented as tabs after the portal instructions. There is no mention of Linux-specific tools, shell environments, or examples (e.g., Bash, scripting for Linux, or Linux-specific considerations). The CLI examples are generic and do not reference Linux usage or differences. The documentation references Windows-centric tools (PowerShell) and patterns, with no Linux parity in terms of environment setup, troubleshooting, or alternative workflows.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux/Bash examples for Azure CLI usage, including environment setup and command execution in typical Linux shells.
  • Include notes on using Azure CLI in Linux environments, such as installation via package managers (apt, yum) and authentication differences.
  • Provide troubleshooting or usage tips for Linux users, such as file permissions, shell differences, or integration with Linux automation tools.
  • Balance PowerShell and CLI coverage by ensuring CLI examples are as detailed and accessible as PowerShell ones, and clarify that CLI is cross-platform.
  • Avoid Windows-centric terminology or tools unless necessary, and always mention Linux equivalents or alternatives when possible.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md ...-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides detailed instructions for creating an Azure HPC Cache using the Azure portal, Azure CLI, and Azure PowerShell. There is a noticeable Windows bias: PowerShell is given a dedicated section with detailed instructions and examples, and the portal instructions implicitly assume a Windows-centric workflow. The PowerShell module is highlighted, and installation steps reference Windows tooling (Install-Module, Connect-AzAccount). There are no Linux-specific examples, nor is there mention of Linux shell equivalents (e.g., Bash, shell scripting) or cross-platform considerations for CLI usage. The CLI instructions are generic, but do not address Linux-specific setup or usage patterns.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux/Bash examples for Azure CLI usage, including shell scripting and environment setup on Linux.
  • Mention cross-platform compatibility for Azure CLI and PowerShell, clarifying how to use these tools on Linux and macOS.
  • Provide instructions for installing and using Azure CLI and PowerShell on Linux, including package manager commands (e.g., apt, yum, snap).
  • Include notes or examples for using Azure Cloud Shell from Linux or macOS terminals.
  • Balance the prominence of PowerShell with equivalent Bash or shell script examples for common tasks.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/configuration.md ...ure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/configuration.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by referencing 'time.windows.com' as the default NTP server and not mentioning any Linux alternatives (e.g., pool.ntp.org). There are no examples or instructions for configuring these settings from Linux environments, nor are Linux-specific tools or patterns discussed. The documentation also refers to Windows-centric domain names and does not provide parity for Linux administrators.
Recommendations
  • Mention Linux-friendly NTP servers such as pool.ntp.org alongside time.windows.com.
  • Provide examples or guidance for configuring MTU, NTP, and DNS from Linux clients or using Linux tools (e.g., ifconfig, resolv.conf, chrony/ntpd).
  • Clarify that the cache can interoperate with both Windows and Linux environments, and offer troubleshooting tips for both.
  • Avoid using Windows-specific terminology or defaults exclusively; present cross-platform options equally.
  • Include references to Linux documentation or best practices for network configuration in Azure HPC Cache contexts.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md ...-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-08-17 00:01
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides detailed instructions and examples for creating an Azure HPC Cache using the Azure Portal, Azure CLI, and Azure PowerShell. However, there is a noticeable Windows bias: PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given a dedicated section with detailed setup and usage instructions, while there is no equivalent section for Linux shell scripting or Bash. The CLI examples are generic but do not explicitly mention or show Linux-specific usage patterns (such as Bash scripting or Linux environment setup). There are no examples or guidance for Linux users beyond the Azure CLI, and no mention of Linux-native tools or workflows. The PowerShell section is more prominent and detailed than any Linux-specific guidance, reinforcing a Windows-first approach.
Recommendations
  • Add a dedicated section or tab for Linux/Bash users, including Bash shell scripting examples for cache creation and management.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI works cross-platform and provide Linux-specific setup steps (e.g., installing Azure CLI on Ubuntu, using Bash variables).
  • Balance the PowerShell section with equivalent Bash/Linux shell examples for all major operations.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, clarify its cross-platform availability, but also provide native Linux alternatives.
  • Include troubleshooting or environment setup notes relevant to Linux users (e.g., using Azure CLI in a Linux terminal, authentication differences, file path formats).
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md ...-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides detailed instructions and examples for Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, with the PowerShell section being particularly extensive. PowerShell is a Windows-centric tool, and its prominence, along with the absence of explicit Linux shell (bash) examples or references to Linux-specific tooling, indicates a Windows bias. There are no Linux-specific command-line examples, nor is there guidance for Linux users beyond the Azure CLI, which is cross-platform but not presented with Linux-specific context or examples.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit bash/Linux shell examples for creating and managing Azure HPC Cache resources, demonstrating parity with PowerShell examples.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI commands can be run on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide Linux-specific setup instructions (e.g., package manager installation commands).
  • Include references to Linux-native tools or workflows where appropriate, such as using bash scripts or integrating with Linux authentication/identity mechanisms.
  • Balance the prominence of PowerShell by ensuring that Linux and cross-platform workflows are equally represented and easy to follow.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, also mention bash or shell scripting alternatives for Linux users.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md ...-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides detailed instructions and examples for Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI, but the PowerShell section is prominent and detailed, reflecting a Windows-centric approach. There are no Linux-specific instructions, nor are there any Bash or shell script examples. The CLI examples are generic, but the PowerShell module is highlighted, and there is no mention of Linux tools or workflows. The documentation does not address Linux-specific considerations or provide parity for Linux users beyond the CLI.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Bash or shell script examples for Linux users alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Include a section or notes on using Azure CLI from Linux environments, mentioning any Linux-specific prerequisites or differences.
  • Balance the order of presentation: do not always present PowerShell before CLI, or alternate the order, or provide a unified example section.
  • Mention Linux-native tools or workflows where relevant (e.g., using Bash, curl, or jq for automation).
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide links or tips for installing and using it on Linux.
  • If PowerShell is mentioned, note that PowerShell Core is available cross-platform, and provide installation guidance for Linux if relevant.
Hpc Cache Use extended groups in Azure HPC Cache ...ocs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-14 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation presents Active Directory (a Windows-centric directory service) as the first and most prominent option for configuring directory services in Azure HPC Cache. The AD section is detailed and appears before Linux/UNIX alternatives (flat file and LDAP). Windows-specific terminology and tools (Active Directory, AD administrator, DNS domain name) are used extensively, while Linux/UNIX equivalents are mentioned later and with less detail. No PowerShell examples are present, but the ordering and emphasis suggest a Windows bias.
Recommendations
  • Reorder sections to present Linux/UNIX options (flat file, LDAP) before or alongside Active Directory.
  • Provide equal detail and guidance for configuring flat file and LDAP sources, including troubleshooting tips and best practices.
  • Explicitly mention Linux/macOS compatibility and use cases in the introduction.
  • Add examples or scenarios for Linux/macOS environments, such as integrating with OpenLDAP or NIS.
  • Clarify that Active Directory is not required and highlight alternatives for non-Windows environments.
Hpc Cache Use extended groups in Azure HPC Cache ...ocs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page presents Active Directory (a Windows-centric technology) as the first and most prominent method for configuring directory services, with detailed instructions and screenshots. Linux/UNIX methods (flat file and LDAP) are described after AD, with less emphasis and detail. The AD section uses Windows terminology and patterns (e.g., computer account, DNS domain name), and there are no Linux-specific troubleshooting tips or parity examples.
Recommendations
  • Reorder sections so that Linux/UNIX methods (flat file and LDAP) are presented before or alongside Active Directory.
  • Provide equal detail and screenshots for configuring flat file and LDAP sources, including common Linux deployment scenarios.
  • Add troubleshooting tips and examples for Linux environments (e.g., how to prepare /etc/group and /etc/passwd files, permissions, common errors).
  • Clarify that AD is not required and highlight Linux-native options for environments without Windows infrastructure.
  • Include references to open-source LDAP servers and Linux authentication best practices.
Hpc Cache Use extended groups in Azure HPC Cache ...ocs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page presents Active Directory (a Windows-centric directory service) as the first and most prominent method for configuring directory services in Azure HPC Cache. The AD configuration section is detailed and appears before Linux/UNIX alternatives (flat file and LDAP). While Linux/UNIX options are included, the ordering and emphasis suggest a Windows-first bias, and Windows tools (Active Directory) are described in greater detail.
Recommendations
  • Reorder the configuration options to present Linux/UNIX methods (flat file and LDAP) before Active Directory, or present all options with equal prominence.
  • Provide equally detailed configuration steps and screenshots for flat file and LDAP methods as are given for Active Directory.
  • Explicitly mention Linux/UNIX directory service equivalents (e.g., FreeIPA, OpenLDAP) and provide examples or references for their use.
  • Include troubleshooting tips and best practices for Linux/UNIX environments alongside those for Windows/AD.
  • Avoid language that implies Active Directory is the default or preferred method unless it is technically required.
Hpc Cache Use extended groups in Azure HPC Cache ...ocs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page presents Active Directory (a Windows-centric directory service) as the first and most prominent option for configuring directory services in Azure HPC Cache. The AD section is detailed and appears before Linux/UNIX alternatives (flat file and LDAP). There is a notable emphasis on Windows tools and terminology, such as AD administrator credentials and domain joining, while Linux/UNIX options are described more briefly and without equivalent depth or troubleshooting guidance.
Recommendations
  • Reorder the configuration options to present Linux/UNIX alternatives (flat file and LDAP) before or alongside Active Directory, rather than after.
  • Provide equally detailed setup instructions and troubleshooting tips for flat file and LDAP configurations, including example file formats and common issues.
  • Include explicit Linux/UNIX command-line examples for preparing and uploading /etc/passwd and /etc/group files.
  • Add guidance for integrating with common Linux identity management solutions (e.g., FreeIPA, OpenLDAP) and mention their use cases.
  • Clarify that Azure HPC Cache supports both Windows and Linux environments equally, and avoid language that implies AD is the default or preferred choice.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md ...ocs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-09 00:34
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page presents Active Directory (a Windows-centric directory service) as the first and most prominent option for configuring directory services in Azure HPC Cache. The AD configuration section is detailed and appears before Linux/UNIX alternatives (flat file and LDAP). There is no mention of Linux-specific tools or patterns beyond referencing standard /etc/passwd and /etc/group files, and no Linux-focused examples or troubleshooting steps are provided. The documentation implicitly prioritizes Windows tools and patterns over Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Reorder the configuration options to present Linux/UNIX methods (flat file, LDAP) before Active Directory, or present them in parallel to avoid implied prioritization.
  • Provide Linux-focused examples, such as sample /etc/passwd and /etc/group file contents, and instructions for generating or exporting these files from Linux systems.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and best practices for Linux/UNIX environments, such as permissions, file formats, and automation scripts.
  • Mention open-source LDAP solutions (e.g., OpenLDAP) and provide guidance for integrating with them, not just generic LDAP instructions.
  • Clarify that both Windows and Linux directory services are supported equally, and highlight any differences or considerations for each platform.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md ...-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-create.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation provides detailed instructions and examples for Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, with a strong emphasis on PowerShell usage and requirements. PowerShell is a Windows-centric tool, and its inclusion as a primary method (with a dedicated tab and extensive setup instructions) indicates a Windows bias. There are no Linux-specific examples, nor is there mention of Linux shell commands or tools. The CLI instructions are platform-neutral but do not explicitly address Linux usage, and PowerShell is presented as an equal alternative to CLI, despite being less relevant for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for cache creation using Azure CLI, including environment setup and command syntax.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide instructions for installing and using it on Linux systems.
  • De-emphasize PowerShell as a primary method, or at least note its Windows-centric nature and suggest CLI for Linux users.
  • Include troubleshooting or tips specific to Linux environments, such as permissions, networking, or package dependencies.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, provide equivalent bash/CLI commands side-by-side to ensure Linux parity.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-prerequisites.md ...lob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-prerequisites.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-08-17 00:01
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation shows a mild Windows bias by referencing 'time.windows.com' as the default NTP server and providing its IP address as an example. This is a Windows-centric default, and no alternative (e.g., pool.ntp.org) is mentioned. However, the command-line examples for network and storage checks are Linux/Unix-based (e.g., openssl, rpcinfo), and there are no PowerShell or Windows-only command examples. The documentation does not provide explicit Linux or Windows client setup examples, but the only NTP example is Windows-specific.
Recommendations
  • Mention cross-platform NTP servers such as pool.ntp.org as alternatives to time.windows.com, or clarify that any standards-compliant NTP server can be used.
  • If referencing time.windows.com, also provide a Linux-friendly example (e.g., pool.ntp.org) and its configuration.
  • Explicitly state that the command-line examples (openssl, rpcinfo) are for Linux/Unix systems, and provide equivalent PowerShell or Windows commands if relevant, or clarify that Linux is the expected environment for these checks.
  • Ensure that any default values or examples (such as DNS or NTP servers) are not Windows-specific unless required by Azure, and if so, explain why.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md ...ocs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page presents Active Directory (a Windows-centric directory service) as the first and most detailed option for configuring directory services, with Linux/UNIX options (flat file and LDAP) described later. The AD section is more prominent and detailed, and there are no Linux command-line or configuration examples, nor any mention of Linux-native tools or patterns. This ordering and emphasis may give the impression that Windows-based solutions are preferred or primary.
Recommendations
  • Reorder the directory service options to present Linux/UNIX-native methods (flat file, LDAP) before or alongside Active Directory, or clarify that all options are equally supported.
  • Provide example commands or configuration snippets for Linux/UNIX environments (e.g., how to prepare /etc/passwd and /etc/group files, or how to configure LDAP servers).
  • Include references to common Linux directory service tools (such as OpenLDAP, SSSD, or nsswitch.conf) where relevant.
  • Balance the level of detail across all options, ensuring that Linux/UNIX methods receive as much explanation and guidance as the Active Directory section.
  • Explicitly state that both Windows and Linux directory services are supported and that the choice depends on the user's environment.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md ...ocs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation presents Active Directory (a Windows-centric directory service) as the first and most detailed option for configuring directory services, with Linux/UNIX options (flat file and LDAP) described afterward. The AD section is more prominent and detailed, and there is no mention of Linux-native tools or examples beyond referencing /etc/passwd and /etc/group files. There are no command-line examples for Linux or Windows, but the ordering and focus suggest a Windows/AD bias.
Recommendations
  • Reorder the directory service options to avoid always listing Active Directory first; consider listing LDAP or flat file first, or presenting all options equally.
  • Expand the flat file and LDAP sections with more detailed configuration steps and troubleshooting tips, matching the depth of the Active Directory section.
  • Include example commands or scripts for generating and securely transferring /etc/passwd and /etc/group files from Linux systems.
  • Mention common Linux directory service tools (such as sssd, nsswitch.conf, or openldap) where relevant.
  • Clarify that both Windows (AD) and Linux/UNIX (flat file, LDAP) directory services are fully supported and provide guidance for mixed environments.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-prerequisites.md ...lob/main/articles/hpc-cache/hpc-cache-prerequisites.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias by exclusively referencing the default NTP server as time.windows.com and using its IP address in firewall rules, without mentioning common Linux/Unix NTP servers (e.g., pool.ntp.org). The instructions for DNS and network configuration are platform-neutral, and all command-line examples use Bash/Linux tools. However, the NTP section's focus on a Windows-centric server and terminology (time.windows.com) may mislead or inconvenience Linux users who typically use other NTP sources.
Recommendations
  • Mention alternative NTP servers commonly used in Linux environments (e.g., pool.ntp.org) alongside time.windows.com.
  • Provide example firewall rules for both time.windows.com and pool.ntp.org, or explain how to substitute the NTP server address as appropriate for the user's environment.
  • Clarify that the choice of NTP server is flexible and not limited to Windows infrastructure.
  • Continue to provide Bash/Linux command-line examples, and ensure parity if any PowerShell or Windows-specific commands are added in the future.
Hpc Cache Configure Azure HPC Cache settings ...ure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/configuration.md
Low Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-14 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 1 bias type
Detected Bias Types
Windows First
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a subtle Windows bias by referencing the default NTP server as time.windows.com, a Windows-centric service, and mentioning it before alternatives. There are no explicit Linux or macOS examples, nor are platform-specific tools or commands discussed. However, the configuration steps are performed via the Azure portal and are generally platform-agnostic.
Recommendations
  • Mention that time.windows.com is the default but that any standards-compliant NTP server (including Linux-based ones like pool.ntp.org) can be used.
  • Provide examples of commonly used NTP servers on Linux (e.g., pool.ntp.org) and clarify that the configuration is not limited to Windows-centric services.
  • Explicitly state that the Azure portal interface is accessible from any OS and does not require Windows-specific tools.
  • Add a note or example for users who may want to configure NTP/DNS using Linux/macOS conventions or tools.
Low Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-14 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation provides detailed instructions and examples for creating an Azure HPC Cache using the Azure Portal, Azure CLI, and Azure PowerShell. The CLI and PowerShell sections are presented as separate tabs, with PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) given equal prominence to Azure CLI. There is no explicit mention of Linux or macOS-specific tools, nor are there any Linux/macOS shell examples (e.g., Bash). The CLI instructions are generic and cross-platform, but the presence of a dedicated PowerShell section and lack of Linux-specific guidance or examples suggests a mild Windows bias.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Bash shell examples for Azure CLI usage, demonstrating commands in a typical Linux/macOS terminal environment.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI works natively on Linux/macOS and provide installation/setup links for those platforms.
  • If relevant, mention any Linux/macOS-specific considerations (e.g., environment variables, authentication methods, file paths) when using Azure CLI.
  • Consider reordering tabs so that Azure CLI (cross-platform) appears before PowerShell (Windows-centric), or clarify platform applicability in tab titles.
  • If PowerShell is required for advanced scenarios, note how to use PowerShell Core on Linux/macOS.
Hpc Cache Manage Azure HPC Cache storage targets ...blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/manage-storage-targets.md
Low Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-14 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 1 bias type
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation focuses exclusively on Azure Portal and Azure CLI methods for managing Azure HPC Cache storage targets, with no mention of Windows-specific tools or commands. However, there are no Linux/macOS-specific examples or considerations, and the only script referenced (flush_file.py) is mentioned without platform context. The Azure CLI example is cross-platform, but there is no explicit parity or guidance for Linux/macOS users, nor are there any PowerShell or Windows-only tools referenced.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state that Azure CLI commands work on Windows, Linux, and macOS, and provide installation/setup links for each platform.
  • If referencing scripts (like flush_file.py), clarify their platform compatibility and provide usage examples for both Windows and Linux/macOS environments.
  • Where possible, include screenshots or terminal examples from both Windows and Linux/macOS to reinforce cross-platform support.
  • Add a note confirming that all management actions described via Azure CLI or Portal are fully supported on Linux/macOS.
Hpc Cache Manage Azure HPC Cache storage targets ...blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/manage-storage-targets.md
Low Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-13 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 1 bias type
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on managing Azure HPC Cache storage targets via the Azure Portal and Azure CLI, without providing any Windows-specific (e.g., PowerShell) examples or tools. However, it does not provide any Linux/macOS-specific instructions or examples, and the only command-line example shown is for the Azure CLI, which is cross-platform. There is a minor mention of a Python script (flush_file.py), but no explicit Linux/macOS parity issues are present. The main bias is the lack of explicit Linux/macOS examples or notes, which could help users on those platforms.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state that Azure CLI commands work on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Provide example commands for both Windows (CMD/PowerShell) and Linux/macOS (Bash) where relevant, especially for CLI usage.
  • Include notes or links for installing and configuring Azure CLI on Linux/macOS.
  • If any scripts or tools are referenced (e.g., flush_file.py), clarify their compatibility with different operating systems.
Hpc Cache https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md ...ocs/blob/main/articles/hpc-cache/directory-services.md
Low Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 1 bias type
Detected Bias Types
Windows First
Summary
The documentation presents Active Directory (a Windows-centric technology) as the first and primary option for directory services integration, with more detailed instructions and screenshots. Linux/UNIX options (flat file and LDAP) are listed after AD and receive less emphasis, though they are covered. There are no PowerShell examples or exclusive use of Windows tools, but the ordering and detail suggest a Windows-first bias.
Recommendations
  • Reorder the directory service options so that Linux/UNIX-compatible methods (flat file, LDAP) are listed before or alongside Active Directory, rather than after.
  • Provide equal detail and screenshots for configuring flat file and LDAP sources, matching the coverage given to Active Directory.
  • Explicitly mention Linux/UNIX environments and use cases in introductory sections to clarify parity and applicability.
  • Add troubleshooting tips and best practices for Linux/UNIX integration, similar to those provided for Active Directory.
  • Ensure terminology and examples are balanced between Windows and Linux/UNIX contexts.