Logic Apps

198
Total Pages
136
Linux-Friendly Pages
62
Pages with Bias
31.3%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues (106)

https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-maps-data-transformation-visual-studio-code.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-17 00:00 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation explicitly states that the Data Mapper tool is only available in Visual Studio Code running on Windows operating systems. There are no instructions, examples, or troubleshooting steps for Linux or macOS users. The prerequisites and all workflow steps assume a Windows environment, and there is no mention of Linux compatibility or workarounds.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly indicate in the introduction and prerequisites that the Data Mapper tool is currently Windows-only, and provide a roadmap or status update for Linux/macOS support if available.
  • Add a dedicated section for Linux/macOS users, outlining any possible workarounds, alternative tools, or expected timelines for cross-platform support.
  • If partial functionality is available on Linux/macOS (e.g., editing maps manually, using CLI tools, or deploying maps), document those workflows explicitly.
  • Ensure all screenshots, file paths, and instructions are either cross-platform or provide platform-specific variants.
  • Monitor and update the documentation as soon as Linux/macOS support is released, ensuring parity in examples and troubleshooting guidance.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-automation-tasks-azure-resources.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows by exclusively referencing Windows-based tools (Fiddler 4) for testing templates and not providing equivalent Linux alternatives or examples. There are no command-line or scripting examples (e.g., PowerShell, Bash), but the only explicit tool guidance is for a Windows application. No Linux or cross-platform alternatives are mentioned for the debugging/testing step.
Recommendations:
  • Include Linux-friendly or cross-platform alternatives to Fiddler, such as mitmproxy or Charles Proxy, in the 'Test your template' section.
  • Provide example instructions for using these alternative tools on Linux/macOS.
  • When referencing third-party tools, clarify their platform compatibility and suggest options for all major operating systems.
  • If possible, add a note or table listing recommended web debugging tools for Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Review other sections for opportunities to add Linux/macOS parity, such as mentioning Azure CLI usage or showing screenshots from non-Windows environments where relevant.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/azure-integration-services-choose-capabilities.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing BizTalk Server and SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)—both Windows-centric technologies—without mentioning Linux or cross-platform alternatives. Migration scenarios and integration examples focus exclusively on moving from these Windows tools to Azure services, with no discussion of Linux-based integration platforms or data tools. No Linux-specific examples, tools, or migration paths are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Include references to Linux-based integration platforms (e.g., Apache Camel, Talend, MuleSoft) and discuss migration or integration strategies for users coming from those environments.
  • Mention cross-platform data integration tools and how they can be lifted and shifted or integrated with Azure Data Factory.
  • Provide examples or case studies for users migrating from Linux or open-source middleware to Azure Integration Services.
  • Balance the discussion of Windows tools (BizTalk, SSIS) with Linux/open-source equivalents to ensure parity and inclusivity.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/export-from-ise-to-standard-logic-app.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page focuses exclusively on Visual Studio Code as the export tool, but all instructions, screenshots, and workflow descriptions implicitly assume a Windows environment. There are no explicit Linux or macOS instructions, no mention of cross-platform differences, and no terminal/CLI alternatives. Keyboard shortcuts (Shift + Alt + A) and UI references are Windows-centric. There is no guidance for Linux users regarding possible differences in UI, file paths, or required dependencies.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state that Visual Studio Code and the Azure Logic Apps (Standard) extension are cross-platform and supported on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Include Linux/macOS-specific instructions or notes where UI, keyboard shortcuts, or file paths may differ.
  • Provide at least one example or screenshot from a Linux (and/or macOS) environment to demonstrate parity.
  • Mention any required dependencies or troubleshooting steps that may be unique to Linux (e.g., installing .NET runtime, handling permissions).
  • If possible, offer CLI-based alternatives (e.g., using Azure CLI or PowerShell Core, which is cross-platform) for users who prefer or require non-GUI workflows.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/tutorial-process-email-attachments-workflow.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently referencing Windows tools (such as Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer), prioritizing Windows in instructions and examples, and providing PowerShell commands without equivalent Linux/bash examples. In several places, the documentation mentions PowerShell before Azure CLI, and in the function app creation section, Windows is selected as the example OS, with in-portal editing only supported on Windows. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, and no mention of Linux-native tools or workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent bash/Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell commands wherever PowerShell is mentioned.
  • Include explicit instructions or screenshots for Linux/macOS users, especially for tools like Azure Storage Explorer and Azure CLI.
  • When referencing operating systems, avoid defaulting to Windows in examples; instead, show both Windows and Linux options or use neutral language.
  • Mention cross-platform alternatives to Windows-only features (e.g., in-portal editing limitations) and provide guidance for Linux/macOS users.
  • Ensure that all prerequisite and setup steps are platform-agnostic or have clear, parallel instructions for Linux/macOS.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-maps-data-transformation-visual-studio-code.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias by explicitly stating that the Data Mapper tool only works on Visual Studio Code running on Windows operating systems. There are no instructions, examples, or troubleshooting steps for Linux or macOS users. The prerequisites and workflow steps assume a Windows environment, and there is no mention of alternative approaches or workarounds for non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly state platform limitations at the top of the documentation, and provide a roadmap or timeline for Linux/macOS support if available.
  • Offer alternative instructions or workarounds for Linux/macOS users, such as using a Windows VM, container, or remote development environment.
  • Include a section addressing the lack of Linux/macOS support, with links to feature requests or community discussions.
  • If possible, provide parity in tooling or recommend equivalent open-source or cross-platform tools for Linux/macOS users.
  • Regularly update the documentation as platform support evolves, and solicit feedback from non-Windows users to prioritize cross-platform parity.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/connect-on-premises-data-sources.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by assuming the on-premises data gateway is installed on a 'local computer' without clarifying cross-platform support, referencing Windows-specific service management (e.g., 'gateway Windows service account'), and repeatedly linking to PowerShell-based automation for gateway management. There are no examples or instructions for Linux environments, nor are Linux tools or command-line alternatives mentioned.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state whether the on-premises data gateway supports installation on Linux or macOS, and provide platform-specific prerequisites if available.
  • If Linux is supported, add installation and management instructions for Linux (e.g., systemd service management, Linux CLI commands).
  • Provide automation examples using cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI or REST API, not just PowerShell.
  • Clarify terminology such as 'local computer' to specify supported operating systems.
  • If PowerShell is required, note its availability on Linux and provide Linux-compatible command examples.
  • Ensure that all references to service management (e.g., restarting the gateway) include Linux equivalents if supported.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/edit-app-settings-host-settings.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific tools and patterns (such as Kudu and CMD), mentioning Windows in configuration settings, and omitting Linux-specific instructions or examples for managing app and host settings. The guidance for editing files and using the Azure portal assumes a Windows environment, with no mention of Linux shells, editors, or file paths. Additionally, some settings (e.g., WEBSITE_NODE_DEFAULT_VERSION) are described as applying 'when running your logic app workflows on Windows' without clarifying Linux/macOS equivalents or differences.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit instructions for Linux and macOS users, including equivalent shell commands (e.g., Bash) and file path conventions.
  • When referencing the Kudu environment, clarify its availability and usage on Linux-based App Service plans and provide alternative instructions if necessary.
  • For settings that are described as Windows-specific (e.g., WEBSITE_NODE_DEFAULT_VERSION), document the behavior and configuration for Linux environments.
  • Include examples of editing configuration files (local.settings.json, host.json) using cross-platform editors (e.g., VS Code, nano, vim) and clarify that these files and settings are platform-agnostic unless otherwise noted.
  • Where the Azure CLI is referenced, ensure that examples and instructions are clearly cross-platform and do not assume a Windows shell.
  • Add a section or notes highlighting any differences, limitations, or considerations when running Logic Apps Standard on Linux versus Windows hosts.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/call-azure-functions-from-workflows.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric tools (such as Visual Studio and PowerShell), referencing Windows-specific patterns (like Kudu's CMD console), and providing PowerShell commands without equivalent Bash/Azure CLI examples. Linux-native workflows and tools are not given equal prominence or examples, and there is a lack of explicit Linux or cross-platform guidance for key steps.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI and Bash command examples alongside PowerShell commands (e.g., for retrieving tenant IDs or managing resources).
  • Mention and demonstrate Linux/macOS-compatible tools (such as VS Code, Azure CLI, and Bash) before or alongside Windows-specific tools like Visual Studio and PowerShell.
  • Include screenshots or instructions for accessing Kudu/Advanced Tools using Bash or cross-platform shells, not just CMD.
  • Add explicit notes or sections for Linux/macOS users, clarifying any differences in workflow or tool usage.
  • Ensure all code snippets and setup instructions are platform-agnostic or provide alternatives for both Windows and Linux environments.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-create-azure-resource-manager-templates.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page exclusively uses PowerShell commands and Windows-centric tooling (e.g., PowerShell modules, ARMClient, C:\ paths) for creating and deploying Azure Logic App templates. There are no equivalent examples or instructions for Linux/macOS users, such as Bash/CLI commands or cross-platform file path conventions. This creates a strong Windows and PowerShell bias, potentially excluding or confusing users on other platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Bash/Azure CLI examples for Linux/macOS users, including how to install and use the LogicAppTemplate module (if possible) or alternative tools.
  • Use cross-platform file path examples (e.g., ~/template.json or ./template.json) instead of Windows-specific paths like C:\template.json.
  • Mention and demonstrate how to perform the same tasks using Azure CLI and/or REST API, which are available on all platforms.
  • Clearly state platform requirements or limitations for the LogicAppTemplate module and ARMClient, and suggest alternatives for non-Windows environments.
  • Reorganize sections so that cross-platform or platform-neutral approaches (e.g., Azure CLI, REST API) are presented before or alongside PowerShell/Windows-specific instructions.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-author-definitions.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by listing Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI when discussing automation tools, referencing Visual Studio (a primarily Windows IDE) and its workflows in detail, and mentioning Visual Studio Code only briefly. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, and the documentation does not provide parity in guidance for Linux users or alternative editors/tools commonly used on Linux. The focus on PowerShell and Visual Studio, both Windows-centric tools, further reinforces this bias.
Recommendations:
  • List Azure CLI before Azure PowerShell when discussing automation tools, or present both equally with cross-platform context.
  • Expand the Visual Studio Code section with step-by-step instructions, as VS Code is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Include explicit Linux command-line examples for deploying and managing Logic Apps, such as using Azure CLI from a Bash shell.
  • Mention and provide examples for alternative editors (e.g., Vim, nano, Sublime Text) for editing JSON workflow definitions.
  • Clarify that all JSON editing and deployment steps can be performed on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and highlight any platform-specific differences.
  • Avoid assuming Visual Studio as the default IDE; instead, provide equivalent guidance for cross-platform tools.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-deploy-azure-resource-manager-templates.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. PowerShell is given a dedicated section and is listed before Azure CLI, with explicit PowerShell command examples. The use of PowerShell scripts is suggested for OAuth authorization, and Windows-centric tools and patterns (such as PowerShell and Azure DevOps) are referenced without equivalent Linux or cross-platform alternatives. There is no mention of Linux shell scripting or other Linux-native tools for deployment or automation.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Bash or shell script examples alongside PowerShell, especially for tasks like OAuth authorization.
  • Clarify that Azure CLI is fully cross-platform and can be used on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • When referencing PowerShell, note that PowerShell Core is available cross-platform, or provide equivalent Bash commands.
  • Include references to Linux-native automation tools (e.g., shell scripts, cron jobs) where PowerShell scripts are suggested.
  • Ensure that the order of examples does not always prioritize Windows tools (e.g., alternate the order of PowerShell and CLI sections, or present them together).
  • Explicitly mention that all deployment methods (except PowerShell) are available and supported on Linux.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/add-run-csharp-scripts.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Windows-based tools and workflows, such as the Azure portal, KuduPlus console, and CMD shell, without mentioning or providing Linux equivalents. All instructions for file access and script management are given in the context of Windows tools, and there are no examples or guidance for users on Linux systems. There is also an absence of PowerShell-specific bias, but the overall workflow assumes a Windows environment.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent instructions for accessing and editing files using Linux tools (e.g., Bash shell in Kudu, SSH, or SCP).
  • Mention that KuduPlus can be accessed via Bash as well as CMD, and show navigation steps for both.
  • Include notes or examples for users developing or deploying from Linux or macOS environments.
  • Clarify that the Azure portal and Logic Apps are cross-platform, and highlight any differences or considerations for Linux users.
  • Where file paths are referenced (e.g., site/wwwroot), note that these are accessible from both Windows and Linux environments.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-schemas.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by recommending Visual Studio 2019 and the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Enterprise Integration Tools Extension (both Windows-only) for schema creation, without mentioning Linux alternatives. Troubleshooting steps reference Windows-specific issues (DPI awareness, registry edits). No Linux or cross-platform schema creation tools or workflows are suggested, and the only code editor example shown is Visual Studio Code, but without explicit Linux guidance. The documentation assumes the use of Windows tools and patterns, with no parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Include guidance for creating schemas using cross-platform or Linux-native tools (e.g., XML editors, command-line tools like xmllint, or open-source alternatives).
  • Mention and provide examples for using Visual Studio Code extensions or other editors available on Linux for schema creation and management.
  • Remove or supplement Windows-specific troubleshooting (e.g., DPI awareness, registry edits) with Linux/macOS equivalents or note that these steps are Windows-only.
  • Explicitly state which steps or tools are Windows-only, and provide Linux/macOS alternatives wherever possible.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux users, outlining recommended tools and steps for schema creation and upload.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-examples-and-scenarios.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page lists PowerShell and .NET scripting as first-class options for running code from Logic Apps, but does not mention or provide parity for Linux-native scripting languages (such as Bash or Python). There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform CLI examples, and the only scripting language with a clear Windows association (PowerShell) is highlighted. Additionally, there is a lack of Linux-specific deployment or management tooling references, and no examples or guidance for Linux users are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Add examples and documentation for running Bash and Python scripts from Logic Apps, alongside PowerShell and .NET.
  • Include cross-platform CLI (e.g., Azure CLI) usage examples for deployment, management, and monitoring tasks, not just Azure Portal or Visual Studio Code.
  • Explicitly mention Linux support and provide Linux-specific guidance or troubleshooting where relevant.
  • Ensure that scripting and automation sections do not default to Windows tools, but present cross-platform or Linux-native options equally.
  • Where PowerShell is referenced, clarify that PowerShell Core is cross-platform and provide Linux installation/use instructions.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-maps.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by primarily referencing Windows-based tools (Visual Studio, Azure Storage Explorer) and workflows, with no mention of Linux equivalents or cross-platform alternatives for key steps. Visual Studio and its extensions are highlighted for map creation and editing, and Azure Storage Explorer (a GUI tool most commonly used on Windows) is the only method described for managing blob storage. There are no CLI or Linux-native instructions, and no mention of PowerShell, but the overall workflow assumes a Windows environment.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions for creating and managing maps using cross-platform tools such as the Azure CLI or Azure PowerShell (with explicit Linux/macOS compatibility).
  • Provide examples for uploading assemblies and maps using the Azure CLI, azcopy, or REST API, which are available on Linux and macOS as well as Windows.
  • Mention and document the use of Visual Studio Code (which is cross-platform) more prominently, and clarify that the Data Mapper extension works on Linux/macOS.
  • For storage management, add steps for using az storage blob commands or azcopy for uploading files to blob storage, instead of only Azure Storage Explorer.
  • Explicitly state that all steps can be performed on Linux/macOS, or provide alternative instructions where certain tools are Windows-only.
  • Add a table or section comparing tool availability and usage across Windows, Linux, and macOS.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/mainframe-modernization-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias by exclusively referencing Microsoft-centric tools (Host Integration Server, Visual Studio, HIS Designer, 3270 Design Tool) and patterns familiar to Windows/Visual Studio users. There are no examples, tools, or workflows described for Linux or cross-platform development environments. The documentation assumes the use of Windows-based development environments and omits mention of Linux alternatives or parity in tooling.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent guidance and examples for Linux-based development environments, including how to use Azure Logic Apps connectors from Linux or cross-platform tools.
  • Mention and, where possible, support open-source or cross-platform alternatives to Visual Studio and Host Integration Server for mainframe integration.
  • Clarify whether the HIS Designer and 3270 Design Tool are available or supported on Linux, and if not, suggest alternative approaches for Linux users.
  • Include CLI-based or code-first examples (e.g., using Azure CLI, REST APIs, or other cross-platform tools) for creating and managing Logic Apps connectors, rather than only GUI/Windows-based workflows.
  • Explicitly state any platform limitations and provide links to Linux-compatible resources or community-supported solutions.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/power-automate-migration.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by exclusively mentioning PowerShell as a scripting language for code snippets, without referencing Bash or other Linux-native scripting options. Additionally, there are no examples or guidance for Linux users, and the development tools highlighted (Visual Studio Code, Azure portal) are cross-platform but the scripting focus remains Windows-centric. No Linux-specific tools, patterns, or examples are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples for running Bash scripts or other Linux-native scripting languages alongside PowerShell and C#.
  • Explicitly mention that Visual Studio Code and the Azure portal are cross-platform, and provide setup or usage notes for Linux users where relevant.
  • Add guidance or links for Linux-based development and deployment workflows, such as using Azure CLI or scripting with Bash.
  • Where PowerShell is referenced, provide equivalent Bash examples to ensure parity for Linux users.
  • Highlight any differences or considerations for Linux environments in migration, deployment, or testing steps.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/quickstart-create-logic-apps-with-visual-studio.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation is heavily oriented toward Windows development environments, specifically Visual Studio on Windows. All instructions, screenshots, and tool references assume the use of Windows and Visual Studio, with no mention of Linux or macOS alternatives. Required tools such as Visual Studio, Azure SDK for .NET, and Azure PowerShell are Windows-centric, and there are no examples or guidance for users on Linux. The use of PowerShell for deployment prompts further reinforces the Windows bias.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent instructions and examples for Linux and macOS users, such as using Visual Studio Code, the Azure CLI, or other cross-platform tools.
  • Explicitly mention and link to cross-platform alternatives (e.g., Visual Studio Code, Azure CLI) at the start of the article, not just in passing.
  • Include Linux/macOS-specific setup steps and screenshots where appropriate.
  • Clarify which steps are Windows-only and offer parallel guidance for non-Windows platforms.
  • If PowerShell is required, note how to use it on Linux/macOS, or provide Bash/Azure CLI equivalents.
  • Consider restructuring the documentation to present cross-platform options first or in parallel, rather than focusing exclusively on Windows.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/add-rules-operators.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references the Microsoft Rules Composer, a Windows-only GUI tool, and provides instructions specific to its interface. There are no examples or guidance for Linux users, command-line alternatives, or cross-platform workflows. No mention is made of using the Rules Engine or composing rules outside of the Windows environment.
Recommendations:
  • Provide information on whether the Microsoft Rules Composer is available or supported on Linux (e.g., via Wine, or if a cross-platform version exists).
  • If the Rules Composer is Windows-only, suggest alternative methods for Linux users, such as editing ruleset XML files directly with cross-platform editors.
  • Include command-line or API-based workflows for rule creation and editing that work on Linux.
  • Explicitly state platform limitations and offer guidance for Linux users to achieve parity in rule authoring and management.
  • Where possible, provide screenshots or step-by-step instructions for both Windows and Linux environments, or clarify when features are Windows-specific.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/testing-framework/create-unit-tests-standard-workflow-runs-visual-studio-code.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Visual Studio Code (VS Code) and C# for unit test creation, with all examples and instructions tailored to the Windows ecosystem. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or mentions of alternative tools or languages commonly used in Linux environments. The workflow assumes the use of Windows conventions (e.g., folder structure, file paths, and keyboard shortcuts) and does not address cross-platform considerations or parity.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit statements confirming cross-platform support for Visual Studio Code and the Azure Logic Apps extension, including any known limitations or differences on Linux.
  • Provide Linux-specific instructions or notes where relevant, such as alternative keyboard shortcuts, file path conventions, and installation steps for dependencies.
  • Include examples or guidance for running and managing unit tests in Linux environments (e.g., using .NET CLI instead of Visual Studio tooling, or integrating with Linux-based CI/CD pipelines).
  • Mention and, if possible, provide sample code for alternative programming languages or frameworks supported on Linux, or clarify if C# is the only supported language.
  • Ensure screenshots and UI instructions are not Windows-centric (e.g., avoid showing only Windows-style file explorers or context menus).
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/create-manage-vocabularies.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references the Microsoft Rules Composer, a GUI tool that is only available for Windows. There are no instructions, examples, or alternatives provided for Linux users, nor is there any mention of command-line or cross-platform approaches. All steps assume the use of a Windows environment and Windows-style UI interactions.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly state platform requirements and limitations at the beginning of the documentation, specifying that Microsoft Rules Composer is Windows-only.
  • If possible, provide or reference any available Linux-compatible tools or command-line alternatives for managing vocabularies and rulesets.
  • Include guidance for Linux users, such as using Azure Portal, REST APIs, or other cross-platform interfaces if available.
  • If no Linux alternatives exist, suggest workarounds (e.g., using a Windows VM or container) and encourage feedback to help prioritize cross-platform support.
  • Ensure future documentation includes parity in examples and tool references for both Windows and Linux environments.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/testing-framework/create-unit-tests-standard-workflow-definitions-visual-studio-code.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Visual Studio Code (a cross-platform tool, but often associated with Windows development) and C# (primarily a .NET/Windows-centric language). There are no examples or instructions for Linux or macOS environments, nor is there any mention of command-line alternatives or Linux-specific workflows. The document assumes the use of Visual Studio Code and C# without addressing how Linux users might set up or run these tests, or whether .NET dependencies are cross-platform.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Visual Studio Code and the Azure Logic Apps extension are available on Linux and macOS, and provide installation/setup instructions for these platforms.
  • Clarify that .NET and C# tooling required for unit tests can be installed and used on Linux (e.g., via .NET Core SDK), and provide links or steps for Linux users.
  • Include at least one example of running or managing tests from the command line (e.g., using dotnet CLI), which is common in Linux workflows.
  • Avoid language that implies Visual Studio Code is a Windows-only tool, and ensure screenshots or instructions are not Windows-specific.
  • If there are any platform-specific limitations or differences, document them clearly for Linux/macOS users.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/azure-arc-enabled-logic-apps-create-deploy-workflows.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation is largely cross-platform in intent, focusing on Azure CLI and Visual Studio Code, both of which are available on Windows, Linux, and macOS. However, there are subtle signs of Windows bias: (1) The documentation refers to 'command window' and 'terminal' interchangeably, but does not provide explicit Linux/macOS shell examples or mention Bash, Zsh, or other common Linux shells. (2) There are no explicit Linux/macOS-specific instructions, troubleshooting tips, or environment setup notes, and no screenshots or examples that show Linux terminals. (3) The installation instructions for Azure CLI are linked generically, but no Linux-specific package manager commands (e.g., apt, yum, brew) are shown. (4) The documentation does not mention or demonstrate using Linux-native tools or patterns (such as Bash scripting, environment variables, or file paths in Linux format), nor does it address potential differences in file permissions, case sensitivity, or CLI usage on Linux.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention both Windows and Linux/macOS environments when referring to 'terminal' or 'command window', and provide examples for both (e.g., 'Open a terminal (Command Prompt on Windows, Terminal on Linux/macOS)').
  • Include Linux/macOS-specific installation commands for Azure CLI (e.g., apt-get, yum, brew) alongside the generic installation guide link.
  • Add example commands and screenshots from Linux/macOS terminals to demonstrate parity.
  • When referencing file paths, show both Windows (C:\path\to\file) and Linux (/home/user/path/to/file) formats where relevant.
  • Mention any known platform-specific issues, such as file permissions or case sensitivity, that may affect Linux users.
  • If scripting or automation is discussed, provide Bash script examples in addition to any PowerShell or batch examples.
  • Ensure that all tool references (such as Visual Studio Code) clarify that they are cross-platform and provide links or instructions for Linux/macOS installation if needed.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/perform-advanced-ruleset-tasks.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation is heavily centered on the Microsoft Rules Composer, a Windows-only GUI tool, and all instructions assume use of this tool. There are no examples or guidance for Linux users, nor are any cross-platform or command-line alternatives mentioned. The workflow and examples are deeply tied to .NET and Windows development patterns, with no mention of Linux-compatible approaches or tools.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state platform requirements and limitations at the start of the documentation, clarifying that the Microsoft Rules Composer is Windows-only.
  • If possible, provide equivalent command-line or cross-platform alternatives for managing rulesets (e.g., using .NET CLI, PowerShell Core, or REST APIs that work on Linux).
  • Include examples or workflows for Linux users, such as how to manipulate rulesets programmatically using .NET Core on Linux.
  • Mention any available or planned Linux-compatible tools, or provide guidance for Linux users on how to interact with rulesets without the GUI.
  • Reorganize sections to clarify platform dependencies before presenting Windows-specific instructions.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-azure-resource-manager-templates-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by referencing Azure PowerShell (and its LogicAppTemplate module) as the only tool for creating Logic App templates, without mentioning cross-platform or Linux-native alternatives such as Azure CLI. The only explicit tooling guidance is for PowerShell, which is traditionally associated with Windows, and no Linux/macOS-specific instructions or examples are provided. This may lead Linux users to believe that template creation is only possible or best supported on Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions and examples for using Azure CLI (which is cross-platform) to create and deploy Logic App ARM templates.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, also mention that Azure CLI can be used, and provide links or references to relevant Azure CLI documentation.
  • If certain features are only available in PowerShell (such as the LogicAppTemplate module), clarify this and suggest alternative approaches for Linux/macOS users.
  • Include at least one example or workflow that demonstrates template deployment or management from a Linux or macOS environment.
  • Review all tooling recommendations to ensure parity for users on non-Windows platforms, and avoid implying that PowerShell is the default or only supported method.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/expression-functions-reference.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-13 21:37 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page is generally cross-platform and does not provide OS-specific command-line examples, but it does exhibit Windows bias in its references to time zone names and date/time formatting. Specifically, it refers exclusively to 'Microsoft Windows Default Time Zones' for time zone names and uses .NET and Windows-centric date/time format strings. There is no mention of IANA/Olson time zone names or Unix/Linux equivalents, and the documentation does not clarify how Linux users should map or use time zones in Logic Apps. Additionally, all links and references for time zone handling point to Windows documentation, and the default examples and explanations assume a Windows/.NET environment.
Recommendations:
  • Add information about IANA/Olson time zone names and clarify whether they are supported or how to map them to Windows time zone names.
  • Explicitly state that time zone names must use the Windows format and provide a mapping table or reference for Linux/Mac users.
  • Where .NET or Windows-specific format strings are referenced, clarify that these are required regardless of the user's OS, and provide guidance for users coming from Linux or other environments.
  • Consider including a note or section on cross-platform considerations for users who may be more familiar with Linux/Unix conventions (e.g., time zone naming, date/time formatting).
  • Where possible, provide links to cross-platform resources or explain the rationale for Windows-centric requirements in Azure Logic Apps.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-as2.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a subtle Windows bias by referencing 'App Service Environment v3 (Windows plans only)' in the connector matrix, without mentioning Linux equivalents or clarifying Linux support. However, there are no explicit Windows-only tools, PowerShell-heavy examples, or missing Linux examples. The documentation otherwise uses cross-platform Azure Portal and browser-based workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Clarify whether Standard logic apps and the AS2 (v2) connector are supported on Linux-based App Service plans, or explicitly state if they are Windows-only.
  • If Linux support is available, add equivalent instructions or notes for Linux-based environments.
  • If Linux support is not available, provide a rationale or roadmap for Linux parity to inform users.
  • Review other documentation pages linked from this one to ensure Linux users are not excluded from related workflows or prerequisites.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-b2b-business-continuity.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by exclusively referencing PowerShell cmdlets for critical operations (such as incrementing control numbers) and not providing equivalent CLI, Bash, or cross-platform alternatives. There are no Linux shell or Azure CLI examples, and the only automation tooling mentioned is PowerShell, which is traditionally associated with Windows. This may hinder users working in Linux or cross-platform environments.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI commands for all PowerShell cmdlet examples, especially for incrementing control numbers and managing integration accounts.
  • Include Bash or shell script examples where automation is discussed, or clarify if the operation can only be performed via PowerShell.
  • Explicitly state cross-platform support for PowerShell Core if relevant, and provide installation guidance for non-Windows users.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, highlighting any differences or additional steps required.
  • Ensure that all critical automation steps can be performed using cross-platform tools, or document any limitations.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-deploy-azure-resource-manager-templates.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. The PowerShell deployment method is listed before the Azure CLI, and PowerShell is highlighted as a primary automation tool (including for OAuth consent scripting). There are no explicit Linux or Bash shell examples, and the scripting guidance assumes familiarity with PowerShell, which is traditionally a Windows-centric tool. The use of Azure DevOps and Azure Pipelines, while cross-platform, is also more commonly associated with Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Bash or shell script examples alongside PowerShell for deployment and automation tasks, especially for OAuth consent scripting.
  • List Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and more familiar to Linux users.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI and Azure DevOps tools are available and supported on Linux/macOS, and provide links or notes for cross-platform usage.
  • If referencing PowerShell scripts, consider also linking to equivalent Bash or Python scripts (if available) or note how Linux users can adapt the process.
  • In sections discussing automation or scripting, avoid language that implies PowerShell is the only or default option.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-edifact.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias by referencing 'App Service Environment v3 (Windows plans only)' as the environment for Standard logic apps, without mentioning Linux support or alternatives. There are no explicit Linux examples, and the documentation assumes the use of the Azure Portal (a web interface, but some features may differ between OSes). The phrase 'Windows plans only' is used without clarifying Linux parity or providing guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Clarify if and how EDIFACT connectors and workflows can be used on Linux-based App Service plans or Azure Logic Apps (Standard) running on Linux.
  • If Linux is not supported, explicitly state this limitation and provide a roadmap or alternatives for Linux users.
  • If Linux is supported, provide equivalent instructions and examples for Linux environments, including any differences in setup or configuration.
  • Avoid using 'Windows plans only' without context—explain the implications for cross-platform users.
  • Where relevant, mention CLI or automation alternatives (such as Azure CLI, which is cross-platform) alongside portal instructions.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Visual Studio (a Windows-only tool) and its extensions for creating maps and schemas, with no mention of Linux-compatible alternatives. Troubleshooting steps and installation instructions are tailored to Visual Studio, including registry edits and DPI settings, which are not applicable to Linux environments. While Visual Studio Code is mentioned as an option for managing and deploying logic apps, there are no Linux-specific instructions or parity in tooling for artifact creation. PowerShell is also referenced as a management option, but no equivalent Bash or CLI examples are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit instructions or alternatives for Linux users, such as using Visual Studio Code extensions or cross-platform CLI tools for creating and managing B2B artifacts.
  • Include Linux-compatible workflows and examples, especially for artifact creation and deployment.
  • Mention and document the use of Azure CLI (az logicapp) for resource management alongside PowerShell.
  • Clarify which steps or tools are Windows-only and offer guidance for Linux/macOS users.
  • If no Linux alternatives exist for certain tasks (e.g., map designer), state this clearly and suggest possible workarounds or roadmap intentions.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-examples-and-scenarios.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page for Azure Logic Apps provides a broad overview and many scenario links, but there is a notable bias toward Windows and Microsoft-centric tooling. PowerShell is specifically called out as a scripting example, and there is no mention of Linux shell scripting or CLI equivalents. The deployment and management sections focus on Azure DevOps and Visual Studio Code, both of which are cross-platform but are often associated with Windows environments. There are no explicit Linux or Bash examples, nor are Linux-native tools or patterns mentioned.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples for running Bash or shell scripts from Logic Apps, alongside PowerShell.
  • When referencing scripting, provide parity between PowerShell and Linux shell scripting (e.g., Bash).
  • Highlight cross-platform CLI tools (such as Azure CLI) and show usage examples on both Windows and Linux.
  • Explicitly mention that Visual Studio Code and Azure DevOps are cross-platform, and provide Linux-specific setup or usage notes where relevant.
  • Add links or sections for deploying and managing Logic Apps from Linux environments, including automation with Bash scripts.
  • Ensure that any sample code or walkthroughs that use PowerShell also provide a Bash or Linux shell equivalent.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-schemas.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by recommending Visual Studio 2019 and the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Enterprise Integration Tools Extension (both Windows-only) for schema creation, without mentioning cross-platform or Linux alternatives. Troubleshooting steps reference Windows-specific actions (e.g., registry edits, DPI-unaware mode). There are no examples or guidance for Linux users, and the only code editor alternative mentioned is Visual Studio Code, but without Linux-specific instructions or parity for schema creation tools.
Recommendations:
  • Include cross-platform or Linux-native tools for schema creation, such as XMLSpy (if available), Eclipse plugins, or open-source alternatives.
  • Provide instructions for creating and managing schemas using command-line tools available on Linux (e.g., xmllint, xsltproc, or other XML/XSD utilities).
  • Mention and provide examples for using Visual Studio Code extensions or other editors on Linux to create and edit schemas.
  • Avoid referencing Windows-specific troubleshooting steps (e.g., registry edits, DPI-unaware mode) without offering Linux/macOS equivalents or clarifying their platform-specific nature.
  • Explicitly state when a tool or step is Windows-only, and offer Linux/macOS alternatives where possible.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, summarizing recommended workflows and tools for schema creation and management.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/manage-logic-apps-with-visual-studio.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation is heavily focused on Windows development environments, specifically Visual Studio and related tools (Cloud Explorer, Azure Logic Apps Tools for Visual Studio, Azure PowerShell). There are no references to Linux or cross-platform alternatives, and all instructions, screenshots, and workflows assume the use of Windows and Visual Studio. No mention is made of using Visual Studio Code, CLI tools, or Linux-compatible workflows for managing Logic Apps.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions and examples for managing Logic Apps using Visual Studio Code, which is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Provide equivalent workflows using Azure CLI and/or Azure Portal for users who do not have access to Visual Studio on Windows.
  • Mention and link to any available Logic Apps tooling or extensions for Linux/macOS environments.
  • Clarify in the prerequisites and throughout the documentation that the described workflow is Windows/Visual Studio-specific, and offer alternative guidance for non-Windows users.
  • Add PowerShell alternatives using Azure CLI where possible, as Azure CLI is cross-platform.
  • Consider including a table or section comparing Windows and Linux/macOS options for Logic Apps development and management.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-securing-a-logic-app.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas. When discussing certificate conversion for client certificate authentication, PowerShell is presented as the primary tool, with detailed steps and syntax. Only as a troubleshooting note is OpenSSL mentioned, and even then, the guidance is less detailed and focuses on resolving errors rather than providing a Linux/Unix-first workflow. There are no Linux shell or OpenSSL command-line examples for the main certificate conversion task, and no mention of Linux-native tools or workflows for other tasks (e.g., base64 encoding, file manipulation). The documentation assumes access to Windows tools and environments, omitting equivalent Linux guidance.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux/Unix shell and OpenSSL command-line examples alongside or before PowerShell examples for tasks such as converting and encoding certificates.
  • When referencing file paths, use both Windows (C:\path) and Linux (/home/user/path) formats.
  • Explicitly mention Linux-native tools (e.g., base64, openssl) for encoding and certificate manipulation, and provide step-by-step instructions.
  • Where troubleshooting steps involve OpenSSL, offer full command-line workflows for Linux users, not just error resolution.
  • Review other sections for implicit Windows assumptions (e.g., screenshots, terminology) and ensure parity for Linux users.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-serverless-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a subtle Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric tools (Visual Studio, Azure PowerShell) and workflows, while not providing Linux-specific examples or mentioning Linux-native tools. Visual Studio and PowerShell are referenced as primary development tools, with no mention of Linux CLI, Bash, or cross-platform alternatives. Quickstart and getting started links focus on Azure portal and Visual Studio, which are more familiar to Windows users, and there are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples.
Recommendations:
  • Include Linux-native and cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, Bash scripting, VS Code on Linux) alongside Visual Studio and PowerShell.
  • Provide explicit Linux-based examples or quickstarts, such as deploying or managing Logic Apps and Functions from a Linux terminal.
  • Mention cross-platform development environments (e.g., Visual Studio Code, JetBrains Rider) before or alongside Windows-specific tools.
  • Add references to documentation or tutorials that use Linux or macOS environments for parity.
  • Ensure that all tooling recommendations are clearly marked as cross-platform or specify OS compatibility.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/mainframe-modernization-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Microsoft-centric tools such as Visual Studio, Host Integration Server (HIS), and related design tools, with no mention of Linux-based alternatives or cross-platform tooling. All examples and tool recommendations are centered around the Windows ecosystem, and there is no guidance for developers working from Linux environments. This focus may limit accessibility and parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Include information about cross-platform alternatives or clarify if the tools (e.g., HIS Designer, 3270 Design Tool) can be used from Linux environments, or provide equivalent Linux-compatible tools if available.
  • Offer examples or workflows that can be executed from Linux-based development environments, such as using VS Code (which is cross-platform) or command-line tools available on Linux.
  • Explicitly state any platform requirements or limitations for the tools mentioned, so Linux users are aware of what is and isn't supported.
  • If no Linux alternatives exist, provide guidance for Linux users on how to interact with Azure Logic Apps for mainframe integration (e.g., via REST APIs, CLI, or other cross-platform SDKs).
  • Balance the documentation by including Linux-first or cross-platform perspectives where possible, ensuring parity in developer experience.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/move-logic-app-resources.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation mentions Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI when listing automation options, and provides no command-line examples for either tool. There are no examples or guidance specific to Linux environments, and the only development tool mentioned for exporting and managing templates is Visual Studio, which is primarily a Windows application. This creates a subtle Windows-first and missing-Linux-example bias.
Recommendations:
  • When listing automation tools, alternate the order (e.g., mention Azure CLI before PowerShell in some places) or explicitly state that both are cross-platform.
  • Provide concrete example commands for both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI, making clear that Azure CLI is fully supported on Linux and macOS.
  • Include references to cross-platform editors (e.g., VS Code) for template editing and deployment, not just Visual Studio.
  • Add a section or note highlighting that all steps can be performed from Linux, macOS, or Windows, and link to relevant cross-platform tool documentation.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/monitor-health-standard-workflows.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows by exclusively referencing the Azure portal (a web UI), and more notably, by instructing users to use KuduPlus and the Debug console with 'CMD' for editing files—tools and terminology that are Windows-centric. There are no examples or instructions for performing equivalent actions using Linux-friendly tools, such as SSH, SCP, or Bash. No command-line or automation examples are provided for Linux users, and the documentation does not mention how to perform these steps outside of the Azure portal or KuduPlus CMD interface.
Recommendations:
  • Provide alternative instructions for Linux users, such as editing host.json via SSH or using the Azure CLI.
  • Include examples of using Bash or other cross-platform shells to update configuration files.
  • Mention that KuduPlus offers both CMD (Windows) and Bash (Linux) consoles, and show how to use the Bash console for file editing.
  • Add Azure CLI or PowerShell (cross-platform) commands for enabling Health Check and updating settings, ensuring parity for users on all operating systems.
  • Clarify that the Azure portal and KuduPlus are web-based and accessible from any OS, but that the CMD reference is a Windows-centric naming convention.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/quickstart-create-logic-apps-with-visual-studio.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation is heavily focused on Windows development environments, specifically Visual Studio (Windows-only), and references Windows tools and patterns throughout. There are no Linux or cross-platform alternatives provided for the main workflow, and PowerShell is mentioned as the only scripting tool. The instructions and screenshots are all for Windows, and there is no mention of how to perform equivalent tasks on Linux or macOS.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent instructions and examples for Linux and macOS users, such as using Visual Studio Code or the Azure CLI for Logic Apps development and deployment.
  • Mention and link to cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, VS Code) earlier and more prominently, not just as alternatives.
  • Include Linux/macOS-specific setup steps, such as installing the Azure CLI, .NET SDK, and relevant extensions for VS Code.
  • Replace or supplement PowerShell instructions with Bash/Azure CLI equivalents.
  • Add screenshots and UI walkthroughs for cross-platform tools (e.g., VS Code) to ensure parity for non-Windows users.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/power-automate-migration.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by highlighting PowerShell scripting as the only example of custom code integration, without mentioning or providing examples for Linux-native scripting languages (such as Bash or Python). Additionally, there is no mention of Linux-specific tools or development patterns, and the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tools (PowerShell, Visual Studio Code) without offering Linux alternatives or parity.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples for running Bash and Python scripts in Standard workflows, alongside PowerShell and C#.
  • Explicitly mention that Visual Studio Code and the Azure Logic Apps extension are cross-platform, and provide Linux installation and usage guidance.
  • Add references or links to Linux-native tools and scripting environments that can be used with Logic Apps.
  • Ensure that scripting and automation examples are balanced between Windows and Linux environments, or at least acknowledge Linux support where applicable.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, clarify that PowerShell Core is cross-platform, and provide Linux-specific instructions or notes.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/build-fact-creators-retrievers.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation is heavily focused on .NET and Microsoft-specific tooling, with all code examples in C# and references to DLL assemblies, which are primarily associated with Windows development. There are no examples or guidance for Linux or cross-platform development, nor any mention of how to use these features outside of a Windows/.NET environment. The documentation assumes the use of Microsoft Rules Composer and related tools, which are Windows-centric.
Recommendations:
  • Provide examples or guidance for using fact creators and retrievers in cross-platform .NET environments, such as .NET Core/.NET 6+ on Linux.
  • Clarify whether the Rules Composer and related tools are available or supported on Linux, and if not, suggest alternative workflows for Linux users.
  • Include instructions for building and deploying assemblies on Linux, such as using the dotnet CLI instead of Visual Studio.
  • Mention any platform-specific requirements or limitations explicitly, so Linux and macOS users are aware of potential issues.
  • If possible, provide sample code or scripts for Linux environments (e.g., bash scripts for building and deploying assemblies).
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/add-rules-operators.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references the Microsoft Rules Composer, a Windows-only GUI tool, and all instructions are based on its use. There are no examples or guidance for Linux users, nor are any cross-platform or command-line alternatives mentioned.
Recommendations:
  • Clarify platform support for Microsoft Rules Composer at the start of the documentation, explicitly stating if it is Windows-only.
  • If available, provide instructions or alternatives for Linux users, such as command-line tools, REST APIs, or cross-platform editors.
  • Include examples or workflows that can be performed without relying on Windows-specific GUI tools.
  • Reference any available open-source or third-party tools that support similar functionality on Linux.
  • If no Linux support exists, suggest workarounds (e.g., running the tool in a Windows VM or via Wine) and note any limitations.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/create-rules.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references the Microsoft Rules Composer, a GUI tool that is only available for Windows. There are no instructions, examples, or alternatives provided for Linux users. All steps, screenshots, and workflows assume the use of this Windows-only application, and there is no mention of command-line, cross-platform, or Linux-compatible approaches.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state the platform requirements for Microsoft Rules Composer, including its Windows-only availability.
  • Provide guidance or alternatives for Linux users, such as programmatic rule creation using cross-platform tools, SDKs, or REST APIs if available.
  • If no Linux GUI is available, document how to create, edit, and manage rulesets and vocabularies using XML or other supported formats on Linux.
  • Include examples or references for managing rules via command-line or scripts that work on Linux (e.g., using .NET Core CLI, PowerShell Core, or Bash).
  • Consider adding a section on how to integrate or deploy rulesets created on Windows to Linux-based Azure Logic Apps environments.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/create-manage-vocabularies.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references the Microsoft Rules Composer, a GUI tool that is only available for Windows. There are no instructions, examples, or even mentions of Linux or cross-platform alternatives. All workflows, screenshots, and prerequisites assume a Windows environment, with no guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state platform requirements early in the documentation, clarifying that the Microsoft Rules Composer is Windows-only.
  • If possible, provide or reference any available Linux-compatible tools or command-line alternatives for managing vocabularies and rulesets.
  • Offer guidance for Linux users, such as using a Windows VM, Wine, or remote desktop solutions, if no native Linux support exists.
  • Advocate for or document REST APIs, CLI tools, or cross-platform SDKs that could allow Linux users to perform equivalent tasks.
  • Include a section addressing Linux/macOS users, outlining current limitations and any planned support.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/create-rules-engine-project.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Microsoft-specific tools (Microsoft Rules Composer, BizTalk Server) that are only available on Windows, and does not provide Linux alternatives or guidance for Linux users. All examples and instructions assume the use of these Windows-only tools, and there is no mention of Linux-compatible workflows, installation steps, or troubleshooting. The documentation implicitly assumes a Windows environment, especially in the prerequisites and rule export sections.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly state in the prerequisites whether the Microsoft Rules Composer and BizTalk Server steps require Windows, and if so, provide guidance for Linux users (e.g., using a Windows VM, Docker container, or remote desktop).
  • If possible, suggest or develop cross-platform alternatives for rule authoring and export, or clarify the limitations for non-Windows users.
  • Add explicit notes or sections for Linux/macOS users, including any workarounds or alternative approaches for steps that require Windows-only tools.
  • Where possible, provide command-line alternatives or open-source tools that can be used on Linux for relevant tasks.
  • Document any known issues or limitations when developing Logic Apps Rules Engine projects on Linux, and provide troubleshooting tips.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/test-rulesets.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references the Microsoft Rules Composer, a Windows-only tool, and provides instructions and UI steps that assume a Windows environment. There are no mentions of Linux or cross-platform alternatives, nor any command-line or scripting examples that would work on Linux. All examples and workflows are centered around the Windows GUI tool, with no guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state the platform requirements and limitations of Microsoft Rules Composer at the start of the documentation.
  • If available, provide information about any cross-platform or Linux-compatible alternatives for ruleset testing.
  • Offer command-line or scripting-based workflows (e.g., using .NET Core CLI tools, Docker containers, or REST APIs) that can be executed on Linux.
  • Include a section addressing Linux/macOS users, even if only to clarify the lack of support and suggest workarounds or future plans.
  • Where possible, decouple the conceptual explanation of ruleset testing from the specific Windows tool, so that the guidance is more broadly applicable.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/add-rules-control-functions.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation is heavily focused on the Microsoft Rules Composer, a Windows-only GUI tool, and does not mention or provide examples for Linux or cross-platform alternatives. All instructions and workflows assume the use of this Windows application, with no command-line or platform-agnostic guidance, nor any mention of how to perform these tasks on Linux or macOS.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state the platform requirements and limitations of Microsoft Rules Composer at the start of the documentation.
  • If available, provide equivalent instructions for Linux or macOS users, such as command-line tools, APIs, or alternative workflows.
  • If no Linux-compatible tools exist, suggest workarounds (e.g., running the tool in a Windows VM or via Wine) or provide guidance on using the underlying APIs or SDKs directly from cross-platform environments.
  • Include sample code or automation scripts (e.g., .NET CLI, REST API, or SDK usage) that can be executed on Linux, not just GUI-based instructions.
  • Add a section addressing cross-platform considerations and explicitly mention any gaps or future plans for Linux support.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/rules-engine-optimization.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias towards Windows by exclusively referencing Microsoft-specific tools (such as Microsoft Rules Composer and .NET), omitting any Linux or cross-platform tooling or examples. All code and configuration references are .NET-centric, and there are no mentions of Linux command-line tools, deployment patterns, or alternative workflows. The documentation assumes the developer is using a Windows environment and Microsoft ecosystem tools, with no guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples or references for Linux-based development and deployment workflows, such as using Azure CLI or cross-platform editors.
  • Mention whether the Rules Composer and related tools are available or supported on Linux, and if not, suggest alternatives or workarounds.
  • Provide parity in examples by showing how to interact with the Rules Engine using REST APIs, Azure CLI, or SDKs available on Linux.
  • Clarify any platform-specific limitations or requirements, especially for .NET and XML handling, and suggest cross-platform approaches where possible.
  • Add a section or note addressing Linux/macOS users, outlining steps or considerations unique to those platforms.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/rules-engine/perform-advanced-ruleset-tasks.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references the Microsoft Rules Composer, a Windows-only GUI tool, and provides instructions and examples that assume a Windows environment (e.g., references to .NET assemblies, BizTalk, and Visual Studio project types). There are no examples or guidance for performing these tasks on Linux or cross-platform environments, nor are alternative tools or command-line approaches mentioned. The documentation implicitly assumes the user is on Windows and using Windows-specific tooling.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state platform requirements and limitations at the beginning of the documentation (e.g., 'Microsoft Rules Composer is only available on Windows').
  • If possible, provide equivalent instructions or alternative tools for Linux users, such as command-line or cross-platform .NET Core/CLI approaches for managing rulesets.
  • Include examples that use cross-platform .NET (e.g., .NET 6/7/8) and clarify which features are available on non-Windows platforms.
  • Reference any available REST APIs, SDKs, or automation scripts that can be used on Linux/macOS to perform similar operations.
  • If no Linux alternatives exist, suggest workarounds or clearly indicate that the described features are currently Windows-only.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/set-up-devops-deployment-single-tenant-azure-logic-apps.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows-first bias in several areas, particularly in the sections on checking pip installation and environment setup, where only Windows and Mac are mentioned explicitly, and Linux is omitted. There are no Linux-specific examples or instructions for common tasks such as checking pip installation or installing the Azure CLI, which may hinder Linux users. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-centric workflows and does not provide parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit Linux instructions and examples alongside Windows and Mac for tasks such as checking pip installation, installing/updating the Azure CLI, and managing environment variables.
  • When providing command-line instructions, include Linux shell equivalents (e.g., bash commands) and note any OS-specific differences.
  • Ensure that all prerequisite and setup steps are cross-platform, or clearly indicate platform-specific steps in separate sections or tabs.
  • Review the documentation for any other implicit Windows assumptions (such as file paths, tool usage, or screenshots) and provide Linux alternatives where appropriate.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/set-up-zone-redundancy-availability-zones.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation references 'Windows plan' multiple times, specifically in the context of enabling zone redundancy, and does not mention Linux-based hosting options or provide parity for Linux users. The instructions and notes focus on Windows plans, implying Windows as the default or only supported environment, with no mention of Linux equivalents or guidance.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention Linux-based hosting options (e.g., App Service plans running on Linux) and clarify whether zone redundancy is supported for them.
  • Provide instructions or notes for both Windows and Linux plans, or clearly state if Linux plans are not supported.
  • Avoid language that assumes Windows as the default (e.g., 'Windows plan') unless it is truly the only supported option, and if so, explain why.
  • If there are differences in feature support between Windows and Linux, summarize them in a comparison table for transparency.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/support-non-unicode-character-encoding.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a subtle Windows bias by referencing Windows-centric encodings (e.g., 'windows-1250', 'windows-1252') in examples, linking to Microsoft/Windows-specific documentation for supported encodings, and omitting Linux/Unix-specific encoding examples or guidance. There are no examples or notes about Linux tools, encodings, or platform-specific considerations, and all code samples are in C#/.NET, which is more common in Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples using common Linux encodings (e.g., 'ISO-8859-1', 'UTF-16', or 'UTF-8') alongside or before Windows-specific encodings.
  • Add notes or examples for Linux/Unix users, such as how to check or convert file encodings using Linux tools (e.g., 'iconv', 'file', 'enca').
  • Reference cross-platform or Linux documentation for character encodings, not just Microsoft/Windows sources.
  • Provide at least one example using a Linux/Unix-based tool or scripting language (e.g., Python) for encoding conversion.
  • Clarify that the .NET code samples can run cross-platform (if true), and mention any platform-specific caveats.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/testing-framework/create-unit-tests-standard-workflow-definitions-visual-studio-code.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Visual Studio Code (VS Code) and C# for unit test creation, without acknowledging or providing examples for Linux or cross-platform development environments. The workflow and tooling described (VS Code, C#) are more commonly associated with Windows development, and there is no mention of Linux-specific considerations, alternative editors, or command-line workflows. The documentation also omits any terminal or shell instructions, which are often relevant for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state that Visual Studio Code and the Azure Logic Apps extension are cross-platform and supported on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Include instructions or notes for Linux users, such as installing .NET SDK and VS Code on Linux, and any Linux-specific prerequisites.
  • Provide example commands for running unit tests from the terminal using dotnet CLI, which is platform-agnostic, rather than assuming usage of the VS Code GUI.
  • Mention any known issues or differences when using the workflow on Linux or macOS, if applicable.
  • Consider including at least one example or screenshot from a Linux environment to demonstrate parity.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/testing-framework/create-unit-tests-standard-workflow-runs-visual-studio-code.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by only referencing Visual Studio Code usage patterns and workflows that are typical for Windows environments (e.g., referencing the 'Run' menu, F5 for debugging, and C#-centric examples), without providing any Linux-specific instructions or examples. There are no mentions of Linux command-line equivalents, terminal instructions, or alternative editors/tools. The documentation assumes a Windows-like experience and omits guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit instructions for Linux users, such as how to start debugging in Visual Studio Code using the command palette or terminal commands (e.g., 'code --start-debugging').
  • Mention keyboard shortcuts and menu navigation differences between Windows and Linux (e.g., F5 may be the same, but menu layouts can differ).
  • Include notes on installing and using the Azure Logic Apps (Standard) extension in Visual Studio Code on Linux.
  • Clarify that all instructions apply equally to Linux and macOS, or provide platform-specific notes where behavior diverges.
  • If any steps require Windows-only features (such as certain C#/.NET dependencies), explicitly state this and provide Linux-compatible alternatives or workarounds where possible.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/set-up-standard-workflows-hybrid-deployment-requirements.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas: Windows and PowerShell tools (such as Chocolatey and Set-ExecutionPolicy) are used for installing Kubernetes CLI tools (kubectl, Helm), and the only explicit file share setup instructions are for Windows. PowerShell scripts and commands are referenced and provided, while Linux equivalents (such as apt, yum, or shell scripts) are missing or not given equal prominence. The documentation references Windows Server and PowerShell walkthroughs before or instead of Linux alternatives, and the use of Windows-centric tools like Chocolatey is not balanced with Linux-native package manager instructions.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux-native installation instructions for kubectl and Helm (e.g., using apt, yum, or curl/bash scripts) alongside or before Windows/Chocolatey examples.
  • Include explicit Linux file share setup instructions (e.g., using Samba or NFS) in addition to the Windows SMB setup steps.
  • Offer Linux shell script equivalents for PowerShell commands and scripts, especially for environment setup and automation.
  • Reference Linux-based Kubernetes cluster setup guides (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS) with equal prominence as Windows Server guides.
  • Avoid assuming Chocolatey or PowerShell as the default tooling; present cross-platform alternatives or clarify OS-specific instructions.
  • Ensure that all code snippets and setup steps are clearly marked for their target OS, and provide parity in detail and support for both Windows and Linux environments.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/tutorial-build-schedule-recurring-logic-app-workflow.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a subtle Windows/Microsoft ecosystem bias by exclusively using Microsoft services and tools (e.g., Office 365 Outlook, Outlook.com, Bing Maps) in all examples and instructions. There are no Linux-specific or cross-platform alternatives mentioned for email providers, mapping APIs, or workflow management. The documentation assumes the user is operating within the Microsoft ecosystem, and does not provide parity for Linux users or those using open-source or non-Microsoft tools.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples using non-Microsoft email providers (e.g., generic SMTP, IMAP, or open-source email services) and provide step-by-step instructions for their integration.
  • Mention and provide examples for alternative mapping APIs (such as Google Maps, OpenStreetMap, or MapQuest) where possible, and link to relevant connectors or custom connector documentation.
  • Explicitly state that Azure Logic Apps is a cross-platform service and can be used from any OS, and provide guidance for Linux/macOS users where relevant (e.g., using Azure CLI or REST APIs from Bash).
  • Add troubleshooting and setup notes for users who may not have access to Microsoft accounts or tools, including how to authenticate with non-Microsoft services.
  • Balance the order of examples and tool mentions so that Microsoft/Windows tools are not always presented first or exclusively.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/tutorial-process-mailing-list-subscriptions-workflow.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a bias toward Windows and Microsoft-centric environments by exclusively using Office 365 Outlook/Outlook.com for email triggers and actions, and by referencing Microsoft accounts and services throughout. There are no Linux-specific examples, nor are alternative email providers (such as IMAP/SMTP or Linux-friendly mail services) given equal prominence. The documentation assumes the user is operating within the Microsoft ecosystem, which may not reflect the needs of Linux or open-source users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel examples using non-Microsoft email providers (e.g., generic IMAP/SMTP connectors) to illustrate how Linux users or those outside the Microsoft ecosystem can implement similar workflows.
  • Explicitly mention and demonstrate how to use Logic Apps connectors with open-source or Linux-friendly email services (such as Gmail, with clear guidance for both G-Suite and consumer accounts, or other IMAP-compatible providers).
  • Include a section or callout that addresses cross-platform considerations, highlighting any differences in experience or setup for users on Linux or macOS.
  • Avoid assuming Office 365 Outlook as the default; instead, present it as one option among several, and ensure that alternative providers are given equal visibility and step-by-step instructions.
  • Where screenshots or UI steps are shown, consider providing equivalent examples for users who may not have access to Microsoft accounts or services.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/tutorial-process-email-attachments-workflow.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-12 23:44 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation displays a Windows bias by consistently referencing Windows tools (such as Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer), presenting Windows as the default or only option in several steps (e.g., in-portal editing for Azure Functions), and listing Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI. There are no Linux-specific instructions or parity notes for Linux users, and examples for command-line operations do not include Bash or Linux shell alternatives. The documentation assumes use of Windows-centric tools and workflows, with minimal acknowledgment of cross-platform needs.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit Linux/macOS instructions and screenshots where applicable, especially for command-line steps and tool installation.
  • When referencing command-line tools, present Azure CLI examples before or alongside Azure PowerShell, as Azure CLI is cross-platform.
  • Mention and link to alternative tools for managing Azure Storage on Linux/macOS (e.g., AzCopy, Azure CLI, or third-party tools) in addition to Storage Explorer.
  • Clarify when features (like in-portal editing) are Windows-only, and provide guidance for Linux users (e.g., how to develop and deploy Azure Functions from Linux).
  • Include notes or callouts for Linux/macOS users throughout the tutorial, especially in setup and troubleshooting sections.
  • Balance screenshots and UI walkthroughs by including those from non-Windows environments where possible.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-as2.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a subtle Windows bias by referencing 'App Service Environment v3 (Windows plans only)' when describing the Standard environment, without mentioning Linux equivalents or clarifying Linux support. There are no explicit Windows-only tools, PowerShell commands, or examples, but the documentation does not address Linux scenarios or provide parity in platform references.
Recommendations:
  • Clarify whether Standard Logic Apps are supported on Linux plans, and if so, provide equivalent instructions or notes for Linux users.
  • If certain features are Windows-only (such as App Service Environment v3), explicitly state this and provide guidance or alternatives for Linux users.
  • Review all platform-specific references to ensure both Windows and Linux users are equally informed about compatibility and deployment options.
  • Include a section or note addressing cross-platform considerations, especially for users deploying Logic Apps in different environments.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-maps-data-transformation-visual-studio-code.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation explicitly states that the Data Mapper tool only works in Visual Studio Code running on Windows operating systems. There are no instructions, examples, or troubleshooting steps for Linux or macOS users. All setup and usage guidance assumes a Windows environment, and there is no mention of parity or alternatives for non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly indicate at the top of the page that Data Mapper is currently Windows-only, and provide a roadmap or estimated timeline for Linux/macOS support if available.
  • Add a dedicated section addressing Linux/macOS users, explaining the current limitations and any possible workarounds (such as using a Windows VM, remote development, or alternative tools).
  • If possible, provide links to feature requests or feedback channels where users can express interest in cross-platform support.
  • Once Linux/macOS support is available, update the documentation with platform-specific installation and usage instructions, and ensure all examples are validated on all supported platforms.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-single-tenant-workflows-azure-portal.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias in several areas. The instructions for creating a Standard logic app resource explicitly require a Windows-based App Service plan and state that Linux-based plans are not supported. The storage account error message references a Windows file path (C:\home\data\Functions\secrets\Sentinels). The troubleshooting section instructs users to use the Kudu Advanced Tools and CMD shell, which are Windows-centric tools and terminology, without mentioning Linux alternatives or clarifying cross-platform compatibility. There are no examples or guidance for Linux users, and no mention of Linux command-line equivalents or considerations.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly state early in the prerequisites and plan selection sections that Standard logic apps currently only support Windows-based App Service plans, and explain any roadmap or alternatives for Linux users.
  • Where Windows-specific tools or paths are referenced (e.g., Kudu, CMD, Windows file paths), clarify whether these are accessible from Linux/macOS environments via the Azure portal, and provide equivalent instructions or notes for non-Windows users.
  • If certain features or troubleshooting steps are only available on Windows, explicitly call this out and suggest alternative approaches for Linux users where possible.
  • Add a section or callout summarizing platform support and limitations, so Linux users can quickly determine applicability.
  • Where possible, provide cross-platform command-line examples (e.g., using Bash or Azure CLI) alongside or in place of Windows CMD instructions.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-automation-tasks-azure-resources.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows by exclusively referencing Fiddler (a Windows-centric tool) for web debugging in the template testing section, and by not mentioning or providing examples for Linux-compatible alternatives. There are no PowerShell or Windows command-line examples, but the only explicit tooling guidance is Windows-focused. No Linux tools or cross-platform alternatives are suggested, and no Linux-specific instructions or screenshots are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Mention and provide examples for Linux-compatible web debugging tools, such as mitmproxy or Charles Proxy, alongside Fiddler.
  • Include instructions or example scripts for using these alternative tools to test templates, ensuring parity for Linux and macOS users.
  • Add a note clarifying that Fiddler is just one option, and that any web debugging tool capable of request interception and modification can be used.
  • Wherever screenshots or step-by-step instructions are given for a tool, consider providing equivalent guidance for a popular Linux alternative.
  • Review other sections for implicit assumptions about the user's OS (e.g., file paths, browser recommendations) and clarify cross-platform compatibility where relevant.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/automate-build-deployment-standard.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation does not display overt Windows bias in terms of mentioning Windows-specific tools or PowerShell, nor does it reference Windows patterns or tools before Linux equivalents. However, it lacks explicit Linux (or cross-platform) command-line examples for key steps such as Git operations, pipeline setup, or script execution. All instructions are given through Visual Studio Code's GUI and Azure DevOps web portal, which are cross-platform, but there is no mention of how to perform these tasks via CLI on Linux or macOS, nor are there any terminal-based examples.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit CLI examples for common tasks (e.g., initializing a Git repo, adding remotes, committing, pushing) using cross-platform commands (git, Azure CLI) to ensure parity for Linux/macOS users.
  • Mention that all steps can be performed on Windows, Linux, or macOS, and clarify any platform-specific requirements or limitations.
  • Where possible, provide Azure CLI or bash script equivalents for actions currently described only via GUI (e.g., pipeline creation, resource group management).
  • Include a note or section on using the Azure Logic Apps extension and Azure DevOps tasks from Linux/macOS environments, confirming cross-platform support.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/azure-integration-services-choose-capabilities.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing BizTalk Server and SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) as primary integration platforms for migration, both of which are traditionally Windows-centric technologies. There are no Linux or cross-platform integration tools mentioned as migration sources or alternatives, and no examples or guidance for users coming from Linux-based integration stacks. The focus on Windows tools and migration paths may leave Linux users underserved.
Recommendations:
  • Include references to common Linux-based integration platforms (such as Apache Camel, Talend, or MuleSoft) and provide migration guidance or comparison for users coming from those environments.
  • Mention and provide examples for integration scenarios that originate from Linux or open-source tools, not just Windows-based ones.
  • Balance the migration narrative by including Linux-native workloads or open-source ETL tools as potential sources for Azure Integration Services.
  • Clarify that Azure Integration Services are cross-platform and highlight support for Linux-based environments where applicable.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/biztalk-server-migration-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias, primarily through the exclusive mention of Windows-specific tools (e.g., BizTalk Administration Console, MMC snap-ins, Windows registry, PowerShell, Windows Authentication, and references to Windows Server/SQL Server/Visual Studio). In several sections, Windows-centric patterns and tools are described in detail, often without Linux or cross-platform alternatives being mentioned or prioritized. While Azure Logic Apps and related services are cross-platform, the migration narrative and tooling references frequently assume a Windows background and ecosystem.
Recommendations:
  • Wherever possible, provide Linux or cross-platform equivalents for administrative tools and configuration patterns (e.g., mention Azure CLI, Bash, or cross-platform SDKs alongside PowerShell and MMC).
  • When discussing deployment and automation, include examples or references for both PowerShell and Bash/CLI scripts.
  • Avoid assuming Windows registry or Windows-specific configuration files as the only configuration store; highlight cross-platform options (e.g., environment variables, Azure App Configuration) equally.
  • In developer tooling sections, mention cross-platform IDEs and editors (e.g., Visual Studio Code) before or alongside Visual Studio, and clarify their support on Linux/macOS.
  • For authentication and security, discuss alternatives to Windows Authentication (e.g., OAuth2, managed identities) and clarify their applicability in non-Windows environments.
  • In sections referencing hosting or infrastructure, explicitly note Linux support for Azure App Service, containers, and hybrid deployments.
  • Review all examples and tool mentions to ensure Linux users are not excluded or left to infer their own paths.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/call-azure-functions-from-workflows.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a mild Windows bias, primarily in the tools and command-line examples provided. Windows-centric tools such as Visual Studio and Azure PowerShell are mentioned explicitly and often before cross-platform or Linux-native alternatives. The only explicit command-line example for retrieving the tenant ID uses PowerShell, with no mention of Bash or Azure CLI equivalents. Visual Studio (Windows-only) is listed before Visual Studio Code (cross-platform) as a function creation tool. There are no Linux-specific instructions or examples, and the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-based workflows and tools.
Recommendations:
  • When listing tools for creating Azure Functions, mention cross-platform options (e.g., Visual Studio Code, Azure CLI) before or alongside Windows-only tools like Visual Studio.
  • Provide Azure CLI (bash) equivalents for all PowerShell commands, especially for common tasks like retrieving tenant IDs.
  • Explicitly state when steps or tools are cross-platform, and provide guidance for Linux/macOS users where applicable.
  • Include screenshots or instructions from non-Windows environments (e.g., terminal, VS Code on Linux/macOS) to demonstrate parity.
  • Audit all command-line and tool references to ensure Linux users are equally supported and not required to use Windows-specific tooling.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/connect-on-premises-data-sources.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell automation for gateway management, mentioning the 'gateway Windows service account', and lacking any Linux-specific instructions or examples for installing or managing the on-premises data gateway. There is no mention of Linux support, tools, or equivalent automation methods, and all troubleshooting and operational guidance assumes a Windows environment.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state whether the on-premises data gateway supports installation and operation on Linux systems. If not supported, clarify this limitation early in the documentation.
  • If Linux is supported, provide installation and management instructions for Linux, including command-line examples (e.g., using bash, systemd for service management).
  • Include Linux-specific troubleshooting steps, such as how to restart the gateway service on Linux.
  • Offer automation examples for Linux environments (e.g., using shell scripts or Azure CLI) alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Avoid referring exclusively to 'gateway Windows service account'; instead, use OS-neutral language or provide both Windows and Linux variants.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-custom-built-in-connector-standard.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by providing PowerShell-based installation and usage instructions as the primary method, referencing Windows-style file paths and tools (e.g., func.exe), and showing output examples with Windows directory structures. While a Bash alternative is mentioned, it still relies on PowerShell scripts, which are not native to Linux/macOS environments. There are no native Linux/macOS installation instructions or examples, and the overall workflow assumes a Windows-centric development environment.
Recommendations:
  • Provide native Bash or shell script alternatives for installing and managing extensions, not just using PowerShell via Bash.
  • Include Linux/macOS-specific instructions and examples, such as using dotnet CLI directly or alternative scripting methods.
  • Show output examples from Linux/macOS terminals (e.g., with /home/user paths) alongside Windows examples.
  • Clarify cross-platform compatibility for all tools and scripts mentioned, and link to any prerequisites for Linux/macOS environments.
  • Avoid assuming the presence of PowerShell on non-Windows systems, or provide guidance on installing and using it if required.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-run-custom-code-functions.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by explicitly stating that the custom functions capability is only available on Visual Studio Code running on Windows. There are no instructions, troubleshooting, or examples for Linux or macOS users. All references to file paths, tools, and environment setup implicitly assume a Windows environment, and there is no mention of Linux equivalents or cross-platform considerations.
Recommendations:
  • Clearly indicate platform support and, if possible, provide a roadmap or alternatives for Linux/macOS users.
  • If the feature is Windows-only, suggest workarounds or alternative approaches for non-Windows users.
  • Include explicit statements about the lack of Linux/macOS support in the prerequisites and throughout the documentation.
  • Provide equivalent instructions, examples, and troubleshooting steps for Linux/macOS if/when support becomes available.
  • Avoid using only Windows-style file paths and environment variables; include cross-platform examples where applicable.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/set-up-devops-deployment-single-tenant-azure-logic-apps.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a subtle Windows bias by presenting environment-specific instructions (such as checking pip installation) that mention Windows and Mac, but do not reference Linux explicitly. Additionally, there are no Linux-specific examples or terminal commands, and the order of instructions and terminology often assumes a Windows or Mac environment. While the Azure CLI is cross-platform, the lack of explicit Linux guidance or examples may make Linux users feel less directly supported.
Recommendations:
  • Include explicit Linux instructions and examples alongside Windows and Mac, especially in sections about checking pip installation and running CLI commands.
  • Add Linux-specific terminal commands and troubleshooting steps where relevant (e.g., using apt, yum, or other package managers for pip installation).
  • When referencing command prompts or terminals, clarify that the instructions apply to all platforms, or provide separate tabs/sections for Windows, Mac, and Linux.
  • Review all environment setup steps to ensure Linux users are not required to infer steps from Windows/Mac instructions.
  • Consider adding a table or section summarizing platform-specific setup steps for Windows, Mac, and Linux.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-standard-workflows-hybrid-deployment.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas: troubleshooting and cluster validation steps are provided only with PowerShell and Windows command prompt examples, with no equivalent Linux/bash commands. The use of 'Run Visual Studio Code as administrator' and references to Windows-specific ports and tools (e.g., SMB file share, PowerShell scripts) further reinforce a Windows-centric approach. Linux or cross-platform alternatives are not mentioned or are missing in key operational and troubleshooting sections.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux/bash equivalents for all PowerShell and Windows command prompt commands, especially for kubectl, helm, and az CLI usage.
  • Include instructions for running Visual Studio Code and required commands on Linux/macOS, not just Windows (e.g., clarify 'run as administrator' for non-Windows platforms).
  • Mention and provide guidance for using NFS or other Linux-friendly file share options alongside SMB, or clarify SMB support on Linux.
  • Ensure troubleshooting scripts and instructions (such as troubleshoot.ps1) have cross-platform alternatives (e.g., bash scripts) or note their compatibility.
  • When referencing tools (e.g., PowerShell, Windows command prompt), always provide parity with bash/zsh or other common Linux shells.
  • Review all screenshots and UI instructions to ensure they are not exclusively Windows-centric, or provide Linux/macOS equivalents where applicable.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/deploy-single-tenant-logic-apps-private-storage-account.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in its troubleshooting section by providing only Windows command prompt examples (e.g., 'C:\>nslookup', 'C:\psping'), referencing Windows-style paths (e.g., 'C:\home\site\wwwroot'), and omitting equivalent Linux/Bash commands and file paths. There are no Linux or cross-platform command-line examples, and the tools mentioned (psping, tcpping) are Windows-centric. The main deployment instructions focus on Azure Portal and Visual Studio Code, which are cross-platform, but the troubleshooting guidance assumes a Windows environment.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Linux/Bash command examples for troubleshooting steps (e.g., 'nslookup', 'dig', 'ping', 'nc' or 'curl' for port checks).
  • Include Linux-style file paths (e.g., '/home/site/wwwroot') alongside Windows paths in error messages and troubleshooting.
  • Mention cross-platform or Linux-native tools (e.g., 'nc' or 'nmap' instead of 'psping') for network connectivity testing.
  • Explicitly state that the troubleshooting steps apply to both Windows and Linux VMs, and provide command examples for both.
  • Where possible, use environment-agnostic language and tools to ensure parity for Linux users.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/create-standard-workflows-visual-studio-code.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: Windows-specific tools and paths are mentioned first or exclusively in key sections (e.g., Windows Defender Firewall, regedit, .exe files, C:\ paths), and some setup and troubleshooting steps are only described for Windows (e.g., registry edits, firewall prompts). Linux/macOS equivalents are missing or only briefly mentioned later, and some examples (such as editing registry keys or handling firewall prompts) are not cross-platform. There is also a tendency to use Windows terminology and screenshots throughout, with limited parity for Linux/macOS users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux and macOS equivalents alongside Windows instructions for all setup, configuration, and troubleshooting steps (e.g., firewall configuration, file paths, environment variables, and permissions).
  • Include Linux/macOS-specific examples and screenshots where relevant, especially for common tasks like editing configuration files, running commands, or handling permissions.
  • Avoid using Windows-specific terminology or tools (such as regedit, Windows Defender Firewall, .exe files) without offering alternatives for other platforms.
  • When referencing file paths, use cross-platform notation or provide both Windows and Linux/macOS examples (e.g., C:\Users\ vs. ~/).
  • For tools like ngrok, show command-line usage for Linux/macOS, not just Windows (e.g., avoid only referencing ngrok.exe).
  • Explicitly state when a feature or step is Windows-only, and provide guidance or workarounds for Linux/macOS users where possible.
  • Review all code snippets and configuration examples to ensure they are valid on all supported platforms, or provide platform-specific variants.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-azure-resource-manager-templates-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing explicit mention and guidance for creating Logic App templates using Azure PowerShell (with the LogicAppTemplate module), but does not mention or provide equivalent examples for Linux or cross-platform CLI tools (such as Azure CLI). The only automation tool referenced for template creation is PowerShell, which is primarily associated with Windows environments. There are no Linux shell or Azure CLI examples, nor is there a discussion of cross-platform approaches. This may leave Linux or macOS users without clear guidance for automating Logic App deployments.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions and examples for creating and deploying Logic App templates using Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • When referencing automation tools, mention Azure CLI before or alongside Azure PowerShell to avoid implying a Windows-first workflow.
  • Provide sample shell (bash) scripts or command-line snippets for Linux/macOS users where appropriate.
  • Explicitly state that all template deployment steps can be performed on any OS using Azure CLI, and link to relevant cross-platform documentation.
  • Review and update any tips or notes that currently reference only PowerShell to include Azure CLI alternatives.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/edit-app-settings-host-settings.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: (1) Instructions for accessing the Kudu environment and file paths in the Azure portal use Windows-centric terminology (e.g., CMD, backslashes in paths), with no mention of Linux alternatives or Bash; (2) The 'WEBSITE_NODE_DEFAULT_VERSION' setting is described as applying 'when running your logic app workflows on Windows', with no equivalent guidance for Linux; (3) There are no examples or instructions for managing app or host settings using Linux-native tools or environments (e.g., Bash, Linux file paths, or Linux-based Azure App Service environments).
Recommendations:
  • Include Linux/Bash equivalents alongside Windows-specific instructions, especially for accessing the Kudu environment and navigating file paths (e.g., show both CMD and Bash navigation).
  • Clarify which settings or behaviors differ between Windows and Linux hosting environments, and provide explicit guidance for both.
  • When referencing settings like 'WEBSITE_NODE_DEFAULT_VERSION', explain how this applies (or not) to Linux environments, and provide Linux-specific configuration steps if needed.
  • Add examples of managing app and host settings using Linux-native tools (e.g., Bash scripts, Linux file navigation, or Linux-based Azure CLI usage).
  • Review all file path examples to ensure both Windows (backslash) and Linux (forward slash) conventions are represented where appropriate.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/handle-long-running-stored-procedures-sql-connector.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page focuses exclusively on SQL Server Agent (a Windows-centric tool) and Azure Elastic Job Agent for job orchestration, with all management examples and screenshots referencing SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS), which is primarily a Windows application. There are no examples or mentions of Linux-native tools or cross-platform alternatives for managing jobs or interacting with SQL Server/Azure SQL. The documentation does not provide parity for Linux users in terms of tooling or workflow.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples or references to cross-platform tools such as Azure Data Studio, sqlcmd, or PowerShell Core (which runs on Linux) for managing jobs and interacting with SQL Server/Azure SQL.
  • Mention and provide examples for using Linux-compatible automation/orchestration tools (e.g., cron jobs, systemd timers, or Azure CLI) to trigger or monitor long-running stored procedures.
  • Add screenshots and walkthroughs using cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure Data Studio) in addition to or instead of SSMS.
  • Clarify which steps or tools are Windows-only and provide Linux alternatives where possible.
  • Highlight any differences or requirements for users running SQL Server on Linux (e.g., SQL Server Agent is available on SQL Server for Linux, but management is different).
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/install-on-premises-data-gateway-workflows.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All installation instructions, screenshots, and operational details assume a Windows environment. There is no mention of Linux or macOS support, nor are there any examples or instructions for non-Windows systems. The documentation references Windows-specific tools (e.g., PowerShell cmdlets, Windows service accounts), and even basic commands (like 'whoami /upn') are Windows-only. The use of PowerShell for automation is highlighted without Linux alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state whether the on-premises data gateway is supported on Linux or macOS. If not, clarify this early in the documentation.
  • If Linux/macOS support exists, provide parallel installation and configuration instructions, including relevant screenshots and command-line examples.
  • Offer automation examples using cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, bash scripts) in addition to PowerShell.
  • Reference Linux equivalents for commands (e.g., how to find the UPN or equivalent on Linux).
  • Discuss service management (start/stop/restart) for the gateway on Linux if supported, or clarify that only Windows services are available.
  • When mentioning Windows-specific tools or patterns, provide context or alternatives for non-Windows users.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-author-definitions.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by listing Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI when mentioning automation tools, referencing Visual Studio (a primarily Windows IDE) with detailed steps, and omitting equivalent Linux/CLI workflows or editors. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform editor instructions, and PowerShell is mentioned before CLI, reinforcing a Windows-first perspective.
Recommendations:
  • List Azure CLI before or alongside Azure PowerShell when mentioning automation tools, to reflect cross-platform parity.
  • Provide explicit instructions or examples for editing workflow JSON using cross-platform editors such as VS Code on Linux/macOS, or command-line tools (e.g., nano, vim, or code command).
  • Include Linux/macOS-specific deployment and editing workflows, such as using Azure CLI in Bash or other shells.
  • Balance Visual Studio references with equivalent steps for Visual Studio Code or other cross-platform tools.
  • Avoid assuming Visual Studio as the default editor; clarify that it is Windows-only and suggest alternatives for other platforms.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-create-api-app.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page does not provide explicit Windows-only examples or mention Windows-specific tools directly. However, there is a subtle bias in the examples and tooling recommendations: all code samples and GitHub references use C#/.NET (e.g., ASP.NET, Swashbuckle, TRex), which are traditionally more common in Windows environments. There are no Linux-specific examples, nor are there references to Linux-native frameworks, deployment patterns, or tools. The focus on Azure App Service and .NET-centric tools may implicitly favor Windows developers, even though cross-platform support exists.
Recommendations:
  • Include example implementations using popular Linux-first stacks (e.g., Flask for Python, Express for Node.js, Spring Boot for Java) alongside .NET examples.
  • Reference Linux-native tools for OpenAPI/Swagger generation (e.g., Swagger CLI, openapi-generator) in addition to Swashbuckle and TRex.
  • Add deployment guidance for Linux-based hosting environments (e.g., Azure App Service for Linux, Docker containers, or Azure Functions on Linux).
  • Ensure that code samples and GitHub references include at least one non-.NET, non-Windows-centric example.
  • Explicitly state that all patterns and recommendations apply equally to Linux-hosted APIs and provide links to relevant Linux documentation where appropriate.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-create-azure-resource-manager-templates.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong bias toward Windows and PowerShell environments. All examples and instructions are provided exclusively using PowerShell commands and Windows file paths (e.g., C:\template.json). There is no mention of Linux or macOS equivalents, nor are there CLI/bash examples or cross-platform instructions. The tools and modules referenced (such as LogicAppTemplate and ARMClient) are presented in a PowerShell-centric manner, and installation steps assume a Windows/PowerShell environment.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent examples using Azure CLI and bash shell commands for Linux/macOS users.
  • Include file path examples using both Windows (C:\...) and Linux/macOS (/home/user/...) conventions.
  • Clarify whether the LogicAppTemplate and ARMClient tools are cross-platform, and if so, provide installation and usage instructions for Linux/macOS.
  • Add a section or callout specifically addressing Linux/macOS users, outlining any differences or prerequisites.
  • Where possible, present Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell examples to promote cross-platform parity.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-custom-api-authentication.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing PowerShell as the only command-line example for creating Microsoft Entra application identities, with no equivalent Bash, Azure CLI, or Linux-native instructions. The PowerShell section is explicitly called out, and there is no mention of cross-platform tools or commands. Additionally, the documentation refers to 'PowerShell' and 'commandlet' terminology, which are strongly associated with Windows environments. There are no examples or guidance for users on Linux or macOS platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell for all command-line operations, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Clearly label both PowerShell and Azure CLI sections, and present them in parallel tabs or sections to ensure parity.
  • Avoid using Windows-specific terminology (such as 'commandlet') without also referencing cross-platform equivalents.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed on Linux/macOS using Azure CLI, and provide links to relevant documentation.
  • Consider including Bash script examples or references for Linux users where appropriate.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-deploy-azure-resource-manager-templates.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. PowerShell is given a dedicated section before Azure CLI, and scripting examples for OAuth consent reference PowerShell specifically, with no mention of Bash or Linux-native alternatives. The Azure DevOps and Azure Pipelines sections focus on Microsoft-centric tools, which are more commonly used in Windows environments. There are no explicit Linux or Bash examples, and no mention of cross-platform scripting approaches.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Bash or shell script examples alongside PowerShell for deployment and OAuth authorization tasks.
  • Explicitly state that Azure CLI commands are cross-platform and can be run on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
  • When referencing scripting for OAuth consent, include or link to Bash/Linux-compatible scripts or note how to adapt the process for non-Windows environments.
  • Balance the order of sections by presenting Azure CLI before or alongside PowerShell, as CLI is often preferred in Linux/macOS environments.
  • Mention cross-platform CI/CD tools (such as GitHub Actions) in addition to Azure DevOps, or clarify that Azure Pipelines can run on Linux agents.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-b2b-business-continuity.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a bias toward Windows by exclusively referencing PowerShell cmdlets for critical disaster recovery operations (such as incrementing control numbers) and does not provide equivalent instructions or examples for Linux or cross-platform environments. There are no CLI, Bash, or REST API alternatives mentioned, and the only automation tooling discussed is PowerShell, which is traditionally associated with Windows, despite now being cross-platform. This may hinder Linux users or those preferring non-Windows automation tools.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI commands or Bash script examples for all PowerShell cmdlet instructions, especially for incrementing control numbers and managing integration accounts.
  • Mention REST API alternatives where available, with example requests, to ensure platform-agnostic automation.
  • Explicitly state if PowerShell Core (cross-platform) is supported and provide installation guidance for Linux/macOS if PowerShell is required.
  • Ensure that all automation steps are demonstrated with both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux (CLI/Bash) tooling, or clarify any platform limitations.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux users, summarizing supported tools and approaches for disaster recovery tasks.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-edifact.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing 'App Service Environment v3 (Windows plans only)' as the only supported environment for Standard logic apps, and by exclusively using the Azure portal (a web-based GUI) for all examples and instructions. There are no references to Linux-specific environments, tools, or command-line alternatives (such as Azure CLI, PowerShell, or Bash scripts), nor are there any examples or guidance for Linux users. The documentation assumes users are working in environments compatible with Windows plans and the Azure portal, potentially excluding Linux-native workflows or automation.
Recommendations:
  • Clarify support for Linux-based App Service plans for Standard logic apps, or explicitly state if only Windows plans are supported.
  • Provide equivalent instructions and examples for Linux users, such as using Azure CLI or ARM templates, in addition to Azure portal steps.
  • Include notes or sections on how to perform relevant tasks (such as uploading schemas, configuring agreements, or managing resources) using cross-platform tools.
  • If certain features are Windows-only, clearly indicate this and suggest alternative approaches for Linux users where possible.
  • Add references to automation and scripting options (e.g., Bash, Azure CLI) for users who prefer or require non-GUI workflows.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Visual Studio (a Windows-only tool) and its extensions for creating maps and schemas, without mentioning any Linux-compatible alternatives or workflows. Troubleshooting steps and installation instructions are also tailored to Visual Studio on Windows. While Visual Studio Code is mentioned as an option for managing and deploying logic apps, there are no Linux-specific examples or guidance, and PowerShell (primarily associated with Windows, though cross-platform) is listed before any Linux-native tools or CLI alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit guidance and examples for Linux users, such as using the Azure CLI or Visual Studio Code for all artifact creation and deployment steps.
  • List cross-platform tools (e.g., Visual Studio Code, Azure CLI) before or alongside Windows-only tools like Visual Studio.
  • Clarify which steps or tools are Windows-specific and offer Linux/macOS alternatives where possible.
  • Include troubleshooting and installation notes relevant to Linux environments.
  • If certain features (like map/schema design) are only available on Windows, state this clearly and suggest possible workarounds or roadmap plans for Linux support.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-enterprise-integration-schemas.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Visual Studio (a Windows-only tool) and the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Enterprise Integration Tools Extension for schema creation, without mentioning cross-platform or Linux alternatives. Troubleshooting steps and notes focus on Windows-specific issues (e.g., DPI awareness, registry edits). No Linux or macOS equivalents or instructions are provided for schema creation or tool installation, and Visual Studio Code is only mentioned for uploading schemas, not for schema creation.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions for creating schemas using cross-platform tools (e.g., XML editors available on Linux/macOS, or command-line tools like xmllint or xsd).
  • Mention and provide examples for using Visual Studio Code (which is cross-platform) with relevant extensions for schema creation and editing.
  • If possible, provide guidance for using open-source or platform-agnostic tools to generate and validate schemas.
  • Add troubleshooting notes relevant to Linux/macOS environments, or clarify when steps are Windows-specific.
  • Ensure that all tool recommendations and examples are either cross-platform or have clear Linux/macOS alternatives documented.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-examples-and-scenarios.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page references running PowerShell scripts from Standard workflows and includes a section on running PowerShell, but does not mention Bash, shell scripts, or Linux-native scripting options. There are no explicit Linux/Unix-specific examples or references to Linux tools, and the scripting section is Windows-centric. Additionally, there are no deployment or management instructions that highlight Linux CLI or Bash usage, and the examples for code execution focus on Windows technologies.
Recommendations:
  • Add examples and documentation for running Bash or shell scripts from Logic Apps workflows, alongside PowerShell.
  • Include references to Linux-native tools and scripting environments where applicable, such as using Azure CLI in Bash.
  • Provide parity in code execution examples by showing both PowerShell (Windows) and Bash (Linux) script integration.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, clarify that cross-platform PowerShell Core is supported, or provide Linux-specific guidance if available.
  • In deployment and management sections, add examples using Linux-based automation tools and shell environments.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-securing-a-logic-app.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias in several areas. PowerShell is used as the primary or only example for certificate conversion and base64 encoding, with no equivalent Linux or cross-platform commands provided. When troubleshooting certificate issues, the guidance focuses on Windows tools (cert mmc/PowerShell) and only mentions OpenSSL as an afterthought, without providing Linux-specific instructions. This approach may hinder Linux or macOS users, as it assumes familiarity with Windows tooling and does not offer parity in examples or guidance.
Recommendations:
  • For all code or command-line examples (such as converting PFX to base64), provide both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux/macOS (OpenSSL, shell) equivalents side by side.
  • When troubleshooting certificate issues, include Linux/macOS-specific steps and error messages, not just Windows tools.
  • Avoid referencing Windows tools (e.g., cert mmc, PowerShell) as the default or only method; instead, present cross-platform alternatives first or equally.
  • Where screenshots or UI steps are shown, clarify if any steps are platform-specific and provide alternatives if needed.
  • Review all sections for implicit Windows assumptions and ensure Linux users can follow the documentation without needing to translate or research missing steps.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/logic-apps-serverless-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a subtle Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric tools (Visual Studio, Azure PowerShell) and workflows, mentioning them before or instead of Linux-friendly alternatives. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform CLI examples, and the quickstart and getting started sections focus on the Azure portal and Visual Studio, which are traditionally Windows-first tools. Linux-native development tools and workflows (such as Azure CLI, Bash, or VS Code on Linux) are not highlighted or exemplified.
Recommendations:
  • Include explicit examples and quickstarts using cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI and Visual Studio Code, especially on Linux.
  • Mention and provide links to Linux-friendly workflows and tools (e.g., Bash scripts, deployment from Linux terminals, VS Code on Linux).
  • Balance the order of tool mentions so that Visual Studio Code and Azure CLI are listed before or alongside Visual Studio and Azure PowerShell.
  • Add sample commands or walkthroughs for Linux users, such as deploying Logic Apps or Functions from a Linux shell.
  • Clarify that all major development workflows are supported on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide documentation links for each platform.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/mainframe-modernization-overview.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Microsoft-centric tools (such as Host Integration Server, Visual Studio, HIS Designer, and 3270 Design Tool) for mainframe and midrange integration. There are no mentions of Linux-based tools, development environments, or cross-platform alternatives. All example tooling and workflows assume a Windows environment, and there are no instructions or guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Include information about cross-platform or Linux-compatible alternatives for mainframe and midrange integration, if available.
  • Provide examples or workflows using non-Windows development environments (such as VS Code on Linux or Mac, or command-line tools).
  • Explicitly state platform requirements and, where possible, offer guidance for Linux users (e.g., running tools in containers, using remote development, or alternative open-source tools).
  • Balance tool recommendations by mentioning both Windows and Linux options, or clarify if certain features are Windows-only and suggest workarounds.
  • Add a section addressing Linux developer scenarios, even if only to acknowledge limitations and provide suggested approaches.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/manage-logic-apps-with-visual-studio.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation is heavily biased toward Windows environments, specifically Visual Studio on Windows. All examples, tool references, and workflows assume the use of Visual Studio, Cloud Explorer, and Azure PowerShell—tools that are either unavailable or have limited support on Linux. There are no instructions or alternatives for Linux users, such as using Visual Studio Code, Azure CLI, or cross-platform editors. The documentation does not mention Linux or macOS compatibility, nor does it provide parity in tooling or workflow for non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions for managing Logic Apps using Visual Studio Code, which is cross-platform, and the Azure Logic Apps (Standard) extension.
  • Include examples using Azure CLI (az logicapp) for tasks such as deployment, downloading, and managing Logic Apps, as Azure CLI is available on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Document how to edit and manage Logic Apps using other cross-platform editors (e.g., VS Code, JetBrains Rider) and JSON templates.
  • Explicitly state the platform limitations of Visual Studio and Cloud Explorer, and provide links or references to Linux/macOS-compatible alternatives.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, provide equivalent Azure CLI commands.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, outlining supported workflows and tools for Logic Apps management.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/monitor-health-standard-workflows.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by exclusively referencing the Azure portal and KuduPlus (with CMD shell) for file editing and configuration, which are Windows-centric tools. There are no examples or instructions for performing equivalent tasks using Linux tools, CLI, or cross-platform approaches. The use of 'CMD' in KuduPlus and the absence of Linux shell or Azure CLI/PowerShell alternatives further reinforce this bias.
Recommendations:
  • Provide alternative instructions for editing files and configuring settings using cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI, Azure Cloud Shell (Bash), or direct SSH access.
  • Include examples for managing the host.json file using Linux shell commands (e.g., nano, vi, or echo/cat for editing JSON files).
  • Mention that KuduPlus offers both CMD and Bash shells, and show how to use the Bash shell for Linux users.
  • Where possible, add Azure CLI commands for enabling Health Check and updating configuration, so users on any OS can follow along.
  • Ensure screenshots and step-by-step instructions are not limited to Windows interfaces or terminology.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/move-logic-app-resources.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation consistently lists the Azure portal, Azure PowerShell, Azure CLI, and REST API as migration options, but always mentions Azure PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) before Azure CLI (cross-platform). No explicit examples or command snippets are provided for either PowerShell or CLI, but the ordering may suggest a Windows-first approach. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or references, and Visual Studio (primarily a Windows IDE) is mentioned for template management, with no mention of cross-platform alternatives like VS Code.
Recommendations:
  • Alternate the order of Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI when listing options, or list Azure CLI first to reflect its cross-platform nature.
  • Provide explicit example commands for both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI, ensuring parity and clarity for Linux users.
  • Mention and provide instructions for using Visual Studio Code (VS Code) as a cross-platform alternative to Visual Studio for managing and deploying ARM templates.
  • Add notes or sections highlighting any platform-specific considerations, especially for Linux/macOS users.
  • Ensure that any references to tools or workflows (such as exporting templates) include cross-platform options and not just Windows-centric tools.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/power-automate-migration.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily by referencing PowerShell as the only scripting language example for running scripts within workflows, without mentioning or providing examples for Linux-native scripting options such as Bash or shell scripts. There is also a lack of Linux-specific tooling or development environment references, with a focus on Visual Studio Code and PowerShell, both of which are traditionally associated with Windows environments, even though VS Code is cross-platform. No Linux-first or cross-platform command-line examples are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Include examples for running Bash or shell scripts in Standard workflows, alongside PowerShell and C#.
  • Explicitly mention and provide examples for developing and deploying Logic Apps from Linux and macOS environments, not just Windows.
  • Reference cross-platform tools and editors (such as VS Code) in a way that highlights their availability and parity on Linux and macOS.
  • If PowerShell is mentioned, clarify that PowerShell Core is cross-platform, and provide Linux usage examples.
  • Add a section or note about how to perform local development, debugging, and deployment from Linux systems, including any prerequisites or differences.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/quickstart-create-logic-apps-with-visual-studio.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation is heavily oriented toward Windows development environments, specifically Visual Studio on Windows. All instructions, screenshots, and tool references assume the use of Windows, with no mention of Linux or macOS alternatives. Windows-specific tools (Visual Studio, Azure PowerShell) are required, and there are no examples or guidance for Linux users. The use of PowerShell for deployment prompts further reinforces the Windows-centric approach.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent instructions for Linux and macOS users, such as using Visual Studio Code or the Azure CLI for Logic Apps development and deployment.
  • Include references and links to cross-platform tools and workflows, e.g., how to use VS Code with the Logic Apps extension, or how to deploy Logic Apps using the Azure CLI.
  • Add Linux/macOS-specific setup and deployment steps, including screenshots where appropriate.
  • Clearly indicate at the beginning that the guide is Windows-specific, and direct users on other platforms to alternative guides.
  • Where PowerShell is mentioned, also provide Bash/Azure CLI equivalents for cross-platform compatibility.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/set-up-sql-db-storage-single-tenant-standard-workflows.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific tools (e.g., SQL Server Management Studio, MSI installers), mentioning Windows authentication for local development, and omitting explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples. The setup and development workflows are described primarily in the context of Visual Studio Code and Azure portal, but there is no mention of Linux-specific development environments, tools, or authentication methods. The documentation assumes a Windows-centric environment for local development and SQL server setup.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit instructions and examples for Linux environments, such as using Azure CLI, Bash, or cross-platform SQL tools (e.g., Azure Data Studio, sqlcmd).
  • Mention and provide examples for Linux-compatible authentication methods (e.g., SQL authentication, managed identities when available) and clarify any differences in setup between Windows and Linux.
  • Reference cross-platform installers for required tools (e.g., Azure Functions Core Tools via npm or apt/yum, not just MSI).
  • Include notes or sections on developing and running Logic Apps on Linux or macOS, including any limitations or required workarounds.
  • List cross-platform SQL management tools alongside SSMS, such as Azure Data Studio or command-line utilities.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/set-up-standard-workflows-hybrid-deployment-requirements.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: it references Windows Server and PowerShell-based workflows before or instead of Linux alternatives, uses Windows-specific tools (such as Chocolatey for installing kubectl and Helm), and provides detailed SMB file share setup instructions only for Windows, with no equivalent Linux example. While some Linux commands are present (e.g., apt-get in a test pod), the overall guidance and tooling favor Windows environments, and Linux-native approaches for key steps (such as SMB share setup) are missing.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel instructions for setting up SMB file shares on Linux systems, including step-by-step guides for common distributions (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS).
  • Include Linux-native installation commands for kubectl and Helm (e.g., using apt, yum, or direct downloads) alongside or before Windows/Chocolatey examples.
  • Reference Linux-based Kubernetes clusters and workflows (e.g., AKS on Ubuntu, generic Linux clusters) equally or before Windows Server-based clusters.
  • Offer PowerShell and Bash script examples side-by-side, or default to Bash/Azure CLI where possible, as these are cross-platform.
  • Clarify when instructions or scripts are Windows-specific and provide equivalent Linux alternatives (e.g., for setting execution policy, environment variables, or running scripts).
  • Expand the SMB file share testing and troubleshooting section to include Linux-native tools and commands (e.g., mount.cifs, smbclient).
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/set-up-zone-redundancy-availability-zones.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page exhibits a mild Windows bias by referencing 'Windows plan' multiple times and only mentioning Windows-based hosting options when discussing zone redundancy. There are no Linux-specific examples, nor is there mention of Linux-based plans or parity in the creation process. The screenshots and instructions focus solely on the Azure portal experience, which is platform-agnostic, but the explicit references to 'Windows plan' without mention of Linux equivalents suggest a Windows-first perspective.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention both Windows and Linux hosting options where applicable, such as 'Windows or Linux plan' instead of just 'Windows plan'.
  • Clarify whether zone redundancy is supported for both Windows and Linux plans, and provide guidance for both.
  • If there are differences in enabling zone redundancy for Linux-based logic apps, include those steps or note any limitations.
  • Add examples or notes for users deploying logic apps on Linux-based App Service plans.
  • Review screenshots and instructions to ensure they are not implicitly favoring Windows environments.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/single-tenant-overview-compare.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a mild Windows bias, most notably by referencing 'Azure App Service Environment v3 (Windows plans only)' multiple times before mentioning any cross-platform or Linux options. There is also a lack of explicit mention of Linux-based hosting or development environments, and no Linux-specific tools or instructions are provided. However, the documentation does not rely heavily on PowerShell or Windows-only CLI tools, and most instructions are platform-agnostic (Azure Portal, VS Code, Azure CLI).
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention Linux-based hosting options (such as Linux App Service plans) where applicable, or clarify if they are not supported.
  • If certain features are Windows-only (e.g., ASE v3), provide equivalent Linux options or clearly state the limitation.
  • Include examples or notes for Linux users, such as using Bash with Azure CLI, or developing on Linux-based VS Code.
  • Where documentation references 'Windows plans only', consider adding a parallel statement about Linux support or lack thereof.
  • Ensure parity in tool recommendations (e.g., if Azure PowerShell is mentioned, also mention Bash/Azure CLI for Linux).
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/support-non-unicode-character-encoding.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric encodings (such as 'windows-1250', 'windows-1252') in examples, referencing .NET and Azure Functions exclusively (which are historically Windows-first technologies), and omitting any Linux/Unix command-line or open-source tool examples (such as iconv or recode). There are no Linux shell, Python, or cross-platform code samples, nor is there mention of Linux-native encoding workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Add Linux/Unix command-line examples for encoding conversion, such as using 'iconv' or 'recode' to convert files between encodings.
  • Include Python or other cross-platform code samples for encoding conversion, demonstrating parity with the .NET/Azure Functions approach.
  • Provide examples using Linux file systems and connectors (e.g., SFTP, NFS) and mention Linux-native encoding names (e.g., ISO-8859-1, UTF-16LE) alongside Windows code pages.
  • Clarify that .NET and Azure Functions are cross-platform, and provide guidance for running these examples on Linux hosts.
  • List encoding names as recognized on both Windows and Linux, and link to cross-platform encoding documentation (such as the Python codecs module or iconv encoding list).
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/tutorial-build-schedule-recurring-logic-app-workflow.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Microsoft/Windows-centric tools and services. It exclusively uses Office 365 Outlook and Outlook.com for email actions, with only a brief mention of Gmail (and with restrictions). There are no examples or guidance for Linux users or for integrating with non-Microsoft email services, and all screenshots and workflow steps are based on the Azure Portal UI, which is most familiar to Windows users. There is no mention of using CLI tools (such as Azure CLI or Bash scripts), nor are there examples for Linux-based workflows or open-source alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Provide examples using non-Microsoft email providers (such as generic SMTP, SendGrid, or other open standards) and show how to integrate them into Logic Apps.
  • Include guidance or examples for users who prefer to use the Azure CLI or Bash scripts to create and manage Logic Apps, in addition to the Azure Portal UI.
  • Add explicit Linux-friendly instructions, such as how to authenticate or manage resources from Linux/macOS environments.
  • Balance the documentation by mentioning and demonstrating non-Windows tools and connectors earlier and more prominently, not just as afterthoughts.
  • Consider including screenshots or walkthroughs from cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, VS Code) to ensure parity for Linux/macOS users.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/tutorial-process-email-attachments-workflow.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows tools (such as Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer), referencing Windows as the default or example operating system, and providing PowerShell examples and links before or alongside Azure CLI, with no explicit Linux or cross-platform alternatives. There are no instructions or screenshots for Linux users, and the use of Windows-specific features (like in-portal editing only on Windows) is highlighted without offering Linux workarounds or parity.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit Linux and macOS instructions and screenshots alongside Windows steps, especially for tool installation and usage (e.g., Storage Explorer).
  • When referencing command-line tools, present Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell, and clarify cross-platform compatibility.
  • Avoid using Windows as the default or only example for operating system selection; include Linux and macOS as equal options.
  • Mention and link to Linux-compatible tools and workflows where available, and note any limitations or differences for non-Windows users.
  • For features only available on Windows (e.g., in-portal editing), suggest alternative approaches for Linux users, such as local development with VS Code or other editors.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/tutorial-process-mailing-list-subscriptions-workflow.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows/Microsoft-centric bias by exclusively using Microsoft services (Office 365 Outlook, Outlook.com) for email triggers and actions, referencing only the Azure portal (which is most commonly accessed via Edge/Windows), and not providing Linux-friendly alternatives or examples. There is no mention of Linux-native email providers, open-source tools, or cross-platform command-line instructions. The workflow assumes the user has access to Microsoft accounts and tools, and does not discuss parity with Linux-based environments or non-Microsoft email providers beyond a brief mention of Gmail (with restrictions).
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit examples using non-Microsoft email providers (e.g., generic IMAP/SMTP, Gmail with Linux clients) and show how to configure them in Logic Apps.
  • Include screenshots or instructions for accessing the Azure portal from Linux systems, or mention the Azure CLI as an alternative to the portal for resource creation and management.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux users, highlighting any differences or additional steps required when using non-Windows environments.
  • Reference open-source or cross-platform tools (e.g., Thunderbird, Evolution, mutt) for email testing, and provide sample workflows using these clients.
  • Ensure that connector documentation links and workflow steps are not solely focused on Microsoft products, and provide equal visibility to alternatives.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/logic-apps/workflow-definition-language-functions-reference.md [View Details]
Scanned: 2025-07-08 04:23 • Page-level bias detected
▼

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page for Azure Logic Apps and Power Automate expression functions shows evidence of Windows bias. Specifically, references to time zone names and date/time formatting consistently point to Microsoft Windows resources (e.g., 'Microsoft Windows Default Time Zones', .NET date/time format strings), and no mention is made of Linux or IANA time zone standards. The documentation relies on .NET conventions and Windows-centric resources, which may not be familiar or directly applicable to Linux users. There are no PowerShell-specific examples, but Windows tools and patterns are referenced exclusively or before any cross-platform alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Where time zone names are referenced, also provide IANA/Olson time zone equivalents or clarify how to map between Windows and IANA time zones.
  • When referencing date/time format strings, note that these are .NET-specific and provide links or mappings to equivalent POSIX/strftime formats where possible.
  • Add a note clarifying that the underlying implementation is based on .NET, which may use Windows conventions, but provide guidance for Linux users on how to adapt or interpret these values.
  • Where external resources are linked (e.g., Microsoft Windows Default Time Zones), also link to cross-platform resources or explain any differences.
  • Explicitly state any platform dependencies or limitations, and provide examples or explanations relevant to Linux environments if applicable.