Detected Bias Types
Windows First
Powershell Heavy
🔧
Windows Tools
Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates several forms of Windows bias. Windows-specific tools (WMI, PowerShell, Registry, COM objects) are referenced extensively and often before Linux equivalents. Windows examples and data collection methods are described in greater detail and with more explicit tooling references (e.g., PowerShell cmdlets, registry paths), while Linux methods are presented mainly as shell commands, sometimes with less explanation or context. Some sections (ASP.NET, Java, Spring Boot web app data) mention only Windows server discovery, omitting Linux scenarios. Storage metadata and application inventory are more detailed for Windows, with Linux coverage being more command-centric and less descriptive.
Recommendations
- Ensure Linux examples and tooling are presented with equal detail and clarity as Windows, including explicit command outputs and context.
- Where Windows-specific tools (e.g., PowerShell, WMI, Registry) are listed, provide Linux equivalents (e.g., systemd, /proc, config files) in parallel, not as an afterthought.
- For sections that mention only Windows server discovery (e.g., web app data), clarify Linux support or explicitly state limitations.
- Add more Linux-centric examples for application inventory, feature detection, and pending updates, with sample outputs and explanations.
- Structure documentation so that Windows and Linux instructions/examples are presented side-by-side, rather than Windows-first.
- Review and expand Linux storage metadata collection to match the granularity and explanation given for Windows.