62
Total Pages
36
Linux-Friendly Pages
26
Pages with Bias
41.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues (39)

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides only .NET SDK (C#) and REST API examples, which are platform-agnostic but most commonly associated with Windows development. There are no examples or references for Linux-specific tools, SDKs, or workflows, nor is there guidance for developers working outside the .NET ecosystem.
Recommendations:
  • Add code samples in other popular cross-platform languages (e.g., Python, Node.js, Java) that are commonly used on Linux.
  • Include REST API examples using curl or HTTPie, which are standard tools on Linux.
  • Explicitly mention that the REST API approach is platform-independent and can be used from any OS.
  • Provide guidance or links for setting up Notification Hubs integration on Linux-based environments.
  • If relevant, mention any Azure CLI commands or scripts that can be run from Linux terminals.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary:
The documentation provides both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI examples for reviewing deployed resources, but PowerShell is presented first and is used exclusively in the 'Clean up resources' section. There is no explicit Linux shell (bash) example for resource cleanup, and PowerShell is implicitly prioritized, which may be less familiar or accessible to Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI (bash) examples alongside or before PowerShell examples, especially in the 'Clean up resources' section.
  • Alternate the order of PowerShell and CLI tabs to avoid always presenting Windows-centric tools first.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work cross-platform (Windows, macOS, Linux) and are often preferred for Linux users.
  • Consider including bash scripting examples for resource cleanup to improve accessibility for Linux users.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias towards Windows by referencing Windows-specific tools (Visual Studio, Solution Explorer) and platforms (Windows Phone, Windows Store, Universal Windows Platform) before or more prominently than their Linux or cross-platform counterparts. There are no examples or instructions for Linux development environments, and the workflow assumes the use of Visual Studio on Windows.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions and screenshots for performing the same tasks using cross-platform IDEs or editors, such as Visual Studio Code or JetBrains Rider, on Linux.
  • Provide command-line alternatives for project navigation and file editing, suitable for Linux and macOS users.
  • Mention and demonstrate how to run and debug the sample code on Linux (e.g., using .NET CLI commands like 'dotnet run', 'dotnet publish').
  • Balance references to Windows-specific platforms (e.g., Windows Store, UWP) with equivalent information for iOS, Android, and other platforms.
  • Clarify that the tutorial is applicable to non-Windows environments and provide any necessary setup instructions for Linux users.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a bias toward Windows by exclusively using an ASP.NET WebAPI backend for the server-side component, with no mention of Linux-friendly or cross-platform alternatives (such as Node.js, Python, or Java backends). The backend example assumes familiarity with Windows-centric technologies and does not provide guidance or code samples for users on Linux or macOS. There are no references to Linux tools, deployment patterns, or command-line instructions, and the only backend stack shown is one most commonly associated with Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent backend implementation examples using cross-platform technologies such as Node.js (Express), Python (Flask/FastAPI), or Java (Spring Boot), and reference these alongside the ASP.NET example.
  • Include instructions for deploying and running the backend on Linux (e.g., using Docker, Azure App Service for Linux, or other Linux-based hosting).
  • Add notes or links for users who may be developing on macOS or Linux, clarifying that the client-side (Android) code is platform-agnostic and that the backend can be implemented in any language or framework.
  • Where possible, use neutral terminology (e.g., 'backend API' instead of 'ASP.NET backend') and provide a selector or toggle in the documentation for different backend stacks.
  • Reference tools and workflows that are available on all platforms, and avoid assuming the use of Windows-only development environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation references Windows-specific resources (such as a link to 'support for TLS protocols on Windows') and omits equivalent Linux guidance or examples. There are no Linux-specific instructions or links, and Windows is mentioned explicitly before Linux. This creates a bias toward Windows users and leaves Linux users without clear guidance.
Recommendations:
  • Add a section or examples describing how to verify or configure TLS 1.2 support on common Linux distributions.
  • Include links to Linux-specific documentation or tools (e.g., OpenSSL, curl, or distro-specific TLS configuration guides).
  • Mention Linux and macOS alongside Windows when discussing operating system compatibility and configuration.
  • Provide parity in troubleshooting steps or verification commands for both Windows and Linux environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exclusively provides .NET (C#) code examples, which are most commonly used on Windows and with Windows-centric tooling. There are no examples or references for Linux users, such as using Azure CLI, REST API, or SDKs commonly used on Linux (e.g., Python, Node.js). The use of Console.WriteLine and .NET SDKs further reinforces a Windows-first approach.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent examples using Azure CLI commands to update Notification Hub FCMv1 credentials.
  • Provide code samples in cross-platform languages such as Python or Node.js, which are widely used on Linux.
  • Include REST API example requests for updating FCMv1 credentials, which can be executed from any platform.
  • Explicitly mention that the .NET SDK can be used on Linux and provide instructions for setting up the environment on Linux, if applicable.
  • Ensure that any tooling or setup steps are not exclusive to Windows (e.g., avoid referencing only Visual Studio or Windows-specific authentication flows).

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing detailed examples and payloads for Windows Store applications (using XML and Windows-specific notification formats) before or instead of Linux/Android equivalents. Windows notification services (WNS, MPNS) and XML payloads are discussed in detail, while Linux/Android (FCM) are only mentioned in passing, with no concrete example payloads or registration templates shown. There are no Linux command-line or tooling examples, and the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows notification paradigms.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit example payloads and registration templates for Android (FCM) and other non-Windows platforms, showing both JSON and XML formats as appropriate.
  • Ensure that examples are balanced: for every Windows-specific example, provide an equivalent for Linux/Android platforms.
  • Mention Linux/Android tools and notification patterns alongside Windows ones, not just in passing.
  • Consider reordering examples so that no single platform (such as Windows) is always presented first.
  • Include a section or appendix on cross-platform tooling and best practices for Linux/Android developers.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Windows-centric code examples and patterns. All sample code is written in C# and uses Windows-specific APIs (such as PushNotificationChannelManager and ApplicationData), with no equivalent Linux, Android, or iOS code samples. The documentation discusses secondary tiles and headers specifically for Windows Store apps, and does not mention or demonstrate how to perform similar registration management from non-Windows platforms or with cross-platform tools. There are no Linux command-line, REST/cURL, or non-Windows SDK examples provided.
Recommendations:
  • Add code samples for Linux, Android, and iOS platforms, using their respective notification APIs and SDKs.
  • Provide REST API examples using cURL or HTTP libraries in languages common on Linux (e.g., Python, Node.js) to demonstrate cross-platform registration management.
  • Include equivalent instructions and code snippets for managing device registration from non-Windows backends (e.g., running on Linux servers).
  • Document any platform-specific differences or requirements for registration, and ensure that Windows-specific features (like secondary tiles) are clearly marked as such, with alternatives or notes for other platforms.
  • Reorganize sections so that platform-agnostic or cross-platform approaches are presented before or alongside Windows-specific guidance.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively using an ASP.NET (Windows-centric) backend for the server-side component, without mentioning or providing examples for Linux-friendly alternatives such as Node.js, Python (Flask/Django), or Java. The backend setup and all code samples assume a Windows development environment and toolchain. There are no instructions or references for setting up or deploying the backend on Linux, nor are there cross-platform command-line or deployment examples. The only backend technology mentioned is ASP.NET, which is traditionally associated with Windows, even though .NET Core is cross-platform.
Recommendations:
  • Provide alternative backend implementation examples using popular Linux-friendly stacks (e.g., Node.js/Express, Python/Flask, Java/Spring Boot) alongside the ASP.NET example.
  • Include instructions for deploying the backend on Linux-based environments (e.g., Ubuntu, Docker) and not just Azure App Service.
  • When referencing backend technologies, mention cross-platform options and clarify that .NET Core can run on Linux.
  • Add Linux/macOS command-line instructions where relevant (e.g., for project setup, deployment, or testing), not just Windows/PowerShell.
  • Explicitly state that the backend can be implemented and hosted on Linux, and provide links to relevant documentation for cross-platform development.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: it directs users to create and validate private endpoints using Windows-centric tools and workflows, such as referencing the creation of a Windows VM and providing only a PowerShell (Resolve-DnsName) command for DNS validation. There are no equivalent instructions or examples for Linux users (e.g., using dig or nslookup), and the validation steps are explicitly tied to Windows environments. The documentation also references Windows tools and patterns before any cross-platform or Linux alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel Linux examples for all validation and management steps, such as using dig or nslookup for DNS resolution.
  • When instructing users to create a VM for validation, offer both Windows and Linux VM creation links and instructions.
  • Avoid referencing only Windows-specific tools (e.g., PowerShell) in validation steps; include cross-platform alternatives.
  • Ensure screenshots and walkthroughs are not exclusively from Windows environments, or supplement them with Linux equivalents.
  • Explicitly state that all CLI steps are cross-platform and clarify any OS-specific requirements or differences.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Heavy Examples
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows platforms by consistently presenting Windows/Windows Phone notification examples first and in greater detail. The initial 'Get started tutorial' link and most code samples focus on Windows (WNS, MPNS) payloads, with screenshots and explanations centered around Windows notification headers and outcomes. Linux or cross-platform command-line usage, tools, or deployment scenarios are not discussed, and there is no mention of Linux-specific considerations or parity in the workflow.
Recommendations:
  • Reorder examples to alternate or rotate the platform order, sometimes showing iOS or Android first.
  • Include explicit instructions or notes for running the Python code on Linux and macOS, such as environment setup, dependencies, and any OS-specific caveats.
  • Add screenshots or logs from non-Windows platforms to illustrate parity in debugging and outcomes.
  • Provide links to platform-agnostic or Linux/macOS-specific tutorials, not just Windows-centric ones.
  • Ensure that all references to 'Get started' or other tutorials are available for multiple platforms, not only Windows.
  • Mention any differences (or confirm the lack thereof) in using Notification Hubs from Linux-based servers or CI/CD pipelines.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Windows Heavy Examples
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a clear Windows bias. Windows platforms (WNS, MPNS) and related credential objects are consistently mentioned first and in greater detail than their Linux or cross-platform counterparts. Many code examples focus on Windows-specific push notification services (WNS, MPNS), and Windows credential setup is shown as the primary example. There is no mention of Linux-specific tools, shell commands, or development patterns, and the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows notification concepts.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equal prominence to Android (FCM) and iOS (APNS) examples and credential setup, not just Windows.
  • Include Linux/macOS shell command equivalents (e.g., show how to build with Maven using bash/sh, not just 'cmd').
  • Reorder examples so that cross-platform or most widely-used platforms (Android/iOS) are presented before or alongside Windows.
  • Add explicit notes or sections for Linux/macOS users, including troubleshooting and environment setup.
  • Ensure that links and sample projects are not Windows-centric and include cross-platform sample apps.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page focuses exclusively on C# examples and references Windows-centric tutorials (WNS, Windows Store, ASP.NET backend), with no mention of Linux, cross-platform, or non-Windows development environments. There are no examples or guidance for Linux users or alternative SDKs/languages.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent examples using cross-platform SDKs (e.g., Node.js, Python) that run natively on Linux.
  • Include instructions or notes for scheduling notifications from Linux environments, such as using REST APIs or CLI tools.
  • Add links to tutorials or documentation that cover non-Windows platforms and mobile backends.
  • Balance the 'Next steps' section with guides for Android, iOS, or generic cross-platform scenarios, not just Windows/ASP.NET.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Windows/Windows Phone-specific notification examples (using Windows toast XML and SendWindowsNativeNotificationAsync), mentioning Windows platforms explicitly, and omitting equivalent Linux, Android, or cross-platform notification examples. The SDK usage is shown only for Windows notifications, and there are no Linux command-line, REST API, or cross-platform code samples.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent examples for sending notifications to Android (using FCM) and iOS (using APNS) with the Notification Hubs SDK.
  • Include REST API examples for sending notifications, which are platform-agnostic and runnable from any OS, including Linux.
  • Provide Node.js or Python code samples that demonstrate sending notifications from non-Windows environments.
  • Rephrase sections that mention Windows platforms first or exclusively, ensuring cross-platform parity in both order and content.
  • Explicitly mention that the SDK and REST APIs can be used from Linux and macOS, not just Windows.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exclusively covers configuration for Microsoft Push Notification Service (MPNS), which is specific to Windows Phone. All instructions, UI elements, and terminology are Windows-centric, with no mention of Linux, cross-platform, or alternative notification services. There are no examples or guidance for Linux users or for configuring notification services for non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • If the service is inherently Windows-specific (as with MPNS), clarify this at the beginning and provide links to equivalent guides for Android (FCM), iOS (APNs), or cross-platform notification services.
  • Include a section or links for configuring push notifications for Linux-based or cross-platform devices using Azure Notification Hubs.
  • Where possible, provide parity in documentation by referencing or linking to Linux/Android/iOS equivalents, ensuring users on non-Windows platforms can find relevant guidance.
  • Explicitly state the platform limitations and suggest alternatives for users not targeting Windows Phone.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation lists Windows OS first in browser support tables and includes Safari as a browser option for Windows and Linux, even though Safari is not natively available on those platforms. There are no command-line examples or tooling references specific to Windows (e.g., PowerShell), but there are also no Linux-specific examples or parity in SDK usage or CLI instructions. The only SDK example is in .NET/C#, which is more common on Windows, and there are no examples in languages or tools more typical for Linux environments (e.g., Python, Node.js, Bash).
Recommendations:
  • Provide SDK usage examples in additional languages/platforms commonly used on Linux, such as Python, Node.js, or Java.
  • Include CLI-based examples (e.g., using curl or Azure CLI) for REST API interactions, which are platform-agnostic and familiar to Linux users.
  • Clarify browser support tables to avoid listing Safari under Windows and Linux, as Safari is not natively available on those platforms.
  • Ensure that any references to tools or workflows are cross-platform or provide Linux-specific alternatives where appropriate.
  • Explicitly mention that all REST API and Azure portal steps are platform-independent, and highlight any platform-specific considerations if they exist.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation presents PowerShell examples before Azure CLI examples and uses PowerShell exclusively for resource cleanup, which may indicate a Windows-first and PowerShell-heavy bias. While Azure CLI is included for resource review, Linux-specific or cross-platform shell examples are not provided for all steps.
Recommendations:
  • Present Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell examples, especially for common tasks like resource cleanup.
  • Include Bash or shell script examples for resource group deletion to ensure Linux parity.
  • Clearly indicate which commands are cross-platform and which are Windows-specific.
  • Consider providing a table or tabbed interface for all commands, allowing users to select their preferred environment (PowerShell, CLI, Bash).

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation provides only C#/.NET code samples for the import workflow, which are most commonly associated with Windows development environments. There are no Linux-specific instructions, command-line examples, or cross-platform scripting alternatives (e.g., Bash, Python, Azure CLI). The only non-C# example is a Java snippet for export, but it lacks parity with the detailed C# import instructions. There are no references to Linux tools or guidance for users working outside the Windows/.NET ecosystem.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent examples using Azure CLI and/or PowerShell for both import and export operations, making sure to include Bash shell examples for Linux users.
  • Provide Python sample code using the Azure SDK for both import and export workflows, as Python is widely used cross-platform.
  • Include explicit instructions for performing file serialization and blob uploads using cross-platform tools (e.g., azcopy, Azure CLI, curl).
  • Clarify that the C#/.NET examples can be run on Linux using .NET Core, and provide any necessary setup instructions.
  • Ensure that all code samples and setup steps are presented in a language-agnostic way first, or provide parallel examples for both Windows and Linux environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively using an ASP.NET WebAPI backend (a Microsoft/Windows-centric technology) for server-side examples, without mentioning or providing alternatives for Linux-based or cross-platform backend frameworks. There are no examples or guidance for implementing the backend using popular Linux technologies (e.g., Node.js, Python Flask, Java Spring). The only backend pattern described is ASP.NET, and the term 'ASP.NET' is used repeatedly as the default or only backend option. No Linux command-line, deployment, or development instructions are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent backend implementation examples using cross-platform or Linux-native frameworks such as Node.js (Express), Python (Flask/Django), or Java (Spring Boot).
  • Include instructions for deploying the backend on Linux-based environments (e.g., Ubuntu, Docker) in addition to Azure App Service for Windows.
  • When referencing backend code, use neutral language (e.g., 'your backend service') and offer links or code samples for both Windows (ASP.NET) and Linux (Node.js, Python, etc.) options.
  • Add a section or links for setting up and testing the backend on Linux/macOS, including any necessary command-line instructions.
  • Ensure parity in troubleshooting and authentication guidance for non-Windows backend stacks.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exclusively provides .NET (C#) code examples, which are primarily associated with Windows environments. There is no mention of Linux, cross-platform, or CLI-based alternatives (such as Azure CLI, Bash, or Python SDK), nor are there instructions or examples for updating Notification Hubs using non-Windows tools or languages.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent examples using Azure CLI commands to update Notification Hub FCMv1 credentials, which are cross-platform and commonly used on Linux.
  • Provide sample scripts in Bash or Python (using the Azure SDK for Python) to demonstrate the same workflow for Linux users.
  • Explicitly mention that the .NET SDK is cross-platform, if applicable, and provide instructions for running the code on Linux/macOS.
  • Include a section comparing available tools (e.g., .NET SDK, Azure CLI, REST API) for updating Notification Hubs, with links to documentation for each.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation is heavily focused on Windows and Universal Windows Platform (UWP) development, with all examples, tooling, and workflows centered around Visual Studio, UWP APIs, and Windows-specific notification services. There are no examples or guidance for Linux, macOS, or cross-platform development environments, nor are alternative tools or approaches mentioned. The backend sample is .NET-based and assumes Visual Studio usage, and all push notification testing is demonstrated on Windows devices.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent instructions and code samples for cross-platform or Linux-based development environments, such as using .NET Core on Linux, or alternative backend stacks (Node.js, Python, etc.).
  • Include examples for sending push notifications to non-Windows platforms (e.g., Android, iOS) using Azure Notification Hubs.
  • Offer guidance for setting up and testing the backend and client apps using open-source editors (e.g., VS Code) and CLI tools instead of Visual Studio.
  • Mention and demonstrate use of cross-platform notification libraries or SDKs.
  • Clarify which steps are Windows-specific and provide alternatives or notes for Linux/macOS users where possible.
  • Add instructions for using cURL, Postman, or other cross-platform tools to interact with the Bing Spatial Data API and Notification Hub endpoints.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation references Windows-specific resources (such as a link to 'support for TLS protocols on Windows') without providing equivalent information or examples for Linux environments. There are no Linux-specific instructions, tools, or references, and the only OS-specific guidance outside of mobile platforms is for Windows.
Recommendations:
  • Add a section or references for checking and configuring TLS support on Linux servers, such as using OpenSSL or updating system libraries.
  • Include links to official Linux documentation or community guides for managing TLS versions.
  • Provide parity in examples and troubleshooting steps for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Mention common Linux distributions and how to verify or update their TLS support.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows development environments and tools. It provides detailed instructions and screenshots for creating and running a .NET console application using Visual Studio, NuGet Package Manager Console, and C#, all of which are Windows-centric. There are no equivalent examples or explicit instructions for Linux or cross-platform environments (e.g., using .NET Core CLI, VS Code, or alternative package managers). The use of Windows-specific terminology and tools (e.g., 'Visual C# console application', 'Package Manager Console', 'F5 in Visual Studio') further reinforces this bias. Linux users are left without guidance for sending notifications from non-Windows systems.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent instructions for Linux and macOS users, such as using the .NET Core CLI (dotnet new console, dotnet add package) instead of Visual Studio-specific steps.
  • Include cross-platform code snippets and terminal commands for installing the Notification Hubs SDK and running the sample app.
  • Mention and illustrate the use of VS Code or JetBrains Rider as alternative IDEs that work on Linux/macOS.
  • Avoid Windows-specific language (e.g., 'press F5 in Visual Studio') or supplement it with cross-platform alternatives (e.g., 'run dotnet run in your terminal').
  • Add explicit notes or sections for Linux/macOS users, especially in areas where the workflow differs from Windows.
  • Ensure screenshots and instructions for sending notifications from the Azure portal are platform-agnostic.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Visual Studio and Windows-specific project structures (e.g., Solution Explorer, .cs files) without mentioning Linux or cross-platform development environments. Windows platforms (MPNS, WNS) are listed before Apple (APNS) and FCM in code examples, and there are no instructions or examples for developing or deploying from Linux or using non-Windows tools.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit instructions or notes for users developing on Linux, such as using VS Code, JetBrains Rider, or command-line tools (dotnet CLI) instead of Visual Studio.
  • Include alternative steps for navigating project files and folders outside of Visual Studio (e.g., using terminal commands).
  • Reorder platform mentions in code and text to avoid always listing Windows first; consider alphabetical or usage-based ordering.
  • Provide guidance on how to run, build, and deploy the sample project from Linux or macOS.
  • Clarify that the code and Notification Hubs functionality are cross-platform, and highlight any platform-specific caveats for non-Windows users.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Visual Studio and Windows-centric development patterns for the backend (e.g., Solution Explorer, Properties window, 'Include In Project', 'Build Action: Embedded Resource'), and by instructing users to deploy to Azure Websites via Visual Studio's Publish workflow. There are no instructions or examples for performing equivalent tasks on Linux or macOS, such as using cross-platform .NET CLI tools, editing project files manually, or deploying via command line or Git. This could hinder users on non-Windows platforms from following the tutorial.
Recommendations:
  • Provide alternative instructions for Linux/macOS users, such as using the .NET CLI (dotnet) to add resources, edit project files, and build/publish the backend.
  • Explain how to manually add embedded resources by editing the .csproj file, instead of relying solely on Visual Studio GUI steps.
  • Include deployment instructions using cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, Git-based deployment) rather than only Visual Studio's Publish dialog.
  • Clarify that Visual Studio steps are optional and provide parity for users developing on Linux or macOS.
  • Where possible, use neutral language (e.g., 'your IDE or editor') and avoid assuming the user is on Windows.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a bias toward Windows by exclusively using an ASP.NET WebAPI backend for the server-side component, with no mention of Linux-friendly alternatives (such as Node.js, Python, or Java backends). The backend example and all references assume a Windows/.NET development environment, and there are no instructions or code samples for setting up or running the backend on Linux or cross-platform stacks. There is also no mention of how to run or test the backend outside of a Windows context.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent backend implementation examples using cross-platform technologies such as Node.js (Express), Python (Flask/FastAPI), or Java (Spring Boot), and reference them alongside the ASP.NET example.
  • Explicitly mention that the backend can be hosted on Linux and provide instructions for doing so (e.g., using Azure App Service for Linux, Docker, or running locally on Linux).
  • Include Linux/macOS-specific setup and testing instructions, such as using curl or HTTPie for API testing, and avoid assuming Visual Studio or Windows-only tooling.
  • When referencing the backend, use neutral terminology (e.g., 'your backend API') and provide links to cross-platform backend samples.
  • Add a note clarifying that the client-side Android code is agnostic to the backend technology, and that any backend capable of implementing the described REST endpoints can be used.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Windows Heavy Examples Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently presenting Windows (WNS, MPNS) examples and terminology before or more prominently than Linux/Android/iOS equivalents. Windows-specific notification types and credentials are shown first in code samples, and the sample links at the end are all Windows/.NET focused. There are no Linux-specific instructions, nor are there examples or references to Linux command-line tools or environments. The only build instruction ('mvn package') is platform-neutral, but otherwise, the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows notification systems and does not provide parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Reorder examples to present cross-platform (Android/iOS) or platform-neutral examples before Windows-specific ones.
  • Add explicit Linux/Unix usage notes or examples, such as running the SDK on Linux, or using Linux-based tools for related tasks (e.g., generating SAS tokens, managing storage).
  • Include links to Linux/Android/iOS sample projects, not just Windows/.NET ones.
  • Balance the coverage of notification platforms in code samples (e.g., show Android/iOS registration and notification examples before or alongside Windows examples).
  • Mention that the SDK and examples work on Linux and provide troubleshooting tips for common Linux environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias throughout. All code samples and application instructions are based on C#/.NET and target Windows platforms (e.g., Windows Store app, Windows toast notifications). The deployment workflow is described exclusively using Visual Studio and Azure WebJobs, both of which are Windows-centric tools. There are no Linux, cross-platform, or non-Windows examples, nor is there mention of how to implement or deploy the solution on Linux or using non-Windows tools.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent sample code and instructions for Linux environments, such as using .NET Core/6+ on Linux, or alternative languages (e.g., Python, Node.js) that are cross-platform.
  • Provide examples of deploying the backend listener as an Azure Function or containerized service, which can be developed and run on Linux as well as Windows.
  • Include instructions for command-line deployment and management (e.g., using Azure CLI, Bash scripts) instead of or in addition to Visual Studio and right-click workflows.
  • Demonstrate how to send notifications to non-Windows mobile platforms (e.g., Android, iOS) using Notification Hubs, with relevant code samples.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform options and clarify which steps are Windows-specific, offering alternatives where possible.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by listing Windows-specific tools and workflows first (e.g., PowerShell, WebMatrix), providing explicit PowerShell/Windows CLI commands, and referencing Windows-centric development environments before their Linux or cross-platform equivalents. Linux and Mac alternatives are mentioned but not given equal prominence or detailed examples.
Recommendations:
  • Ensure that instructions for creating and deploying Node.js applications include Linux and macOS workflows (e.g., using Bash, Terminal, or cross-platform editors like VS Code) alongside or before Windows-specific tools.
  • When mentioning command-line interfaces, list Bash (Linux), Terminal (macOS), and PowerShell (Windows) in a neutral or rotating order, and provide equivalent command examples for each where relevant.
  • For retrieving connection strings or performing Azure operations, provide Azure CLI examples (which are cross-platform) before or alongside PowerShell commands.
  • Avoid referencing Windows-only tools (such as WebMatrix) without offering cross-platform alternatives.
  • Audit all step-by-step instructions to ensure Linux users are not left to infer steps or commands that are only explicitly shown for Windows.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Examples Prominence
Summary:
The documentation presents Windows (Store and Phone) notification examples before iOS and Android, and includes detailed notes about Windows-specific headers and formats. While Linux is not directly relevant to the PHP backend context, the ordering and emphasis on Windows platforms over others (such as iOS and Android) may reflect a subtle Windows bias. There are no PowerShell, Windows command-line, or Windows-only tool references, and all code is PHP (cross-platform).
Recommendations:
  • Reorder the platform-specific notification examples to avoid always listing Windows first. Consider rotating the order or listing iOS and Android before Windows to reflect their prevalence.
  • Ensure that notes and comments about platform-specific headers are balanced; for example, provide similar detail for iOS and Android as is given for Windows.
  • If referencing platform-specific features or issues, provide parity across all major platforms (Windows, iOS, Android) in terms of depth and clarity.
  • Explicitly mention that the PHP code is cross-platform and can be run on Linux, macOS, or Windows servers, to reinforce platform neutrality.
  • If any platform-specific setup is required (e.g., cURL installation), provide instructions for both Linux and Windows environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page focuses exclusively on C# and .NET SDK usage, with all code examples and linked tutorials referencing Windows-centric technologies (e.g., WNS, Windows Store, .NET). There are no examples or references for Linux-based development environments, alternative SDKs, or cross-platform command-line tools.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent examples using cross-platform SDKs (such as Node.js, Python, or Java) that can be run on Linux.
  • Include instructions or references for scheduling notifications using REST APIs or Azure CLI, which are platform-agnostic.
  • Add links to tutorials or documentation for non-Windows platforms, such as Android, iOS, or generic backend services running on Linux.
  • Balance the 'Next steps' section with guides that are not specific to Windows or .NET.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation provides code samples and configuration instructions that are focused on .NET/C# and the Azure portal, with no mention of Linux-specific tools, SDKs, or command-line examples. The only code sample is in C#, which is most commonly associated with Windows development, and there are no examples or guidance for Linux users or cross-platform command-line usage.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent code samples using cross-platform languages or SDKs (e.g., Python, Node.js) that are commonly used on Linux.
  • Include instructions for configuring APNS token-based authentication using the Azure CLI or REST API, which are platform-agnostic.
  • Explicitly mention that the .NET SDK can be used on Linux and provide setup instructions for Linux environments.
  • If relevant, provide shell script examples or references for Linux users to automate configuration steps.
  • Ensure that any screenshots or UI references are not Windows-specific, or provide notes for Linux/macOS users if differences exist.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Windows-centric code samples (using C# and Windows APIs), referencing Windows-specific concepts (e.g., ChannelUri, Windows Store apps, ApplicationData), and omitting equivalent Linux or cross-platform examples. There is no mention of Linux client registration, nor are there code samples or guidance for Linux or non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Add code samples for registering devices from Linux clients, using languages and libraries common on Linux (e.g., Python, Java, Node.js).
  • Include examples that use cross-platform REST API calls (e.g., using curl, Python requests, or JavaScript fetch) for device registration and installation management.
  • Document how to obtain PNS handles and manage registrations on non-Windows platforms, such as Android, iOS, or Linux IoT devices.
  • Avoid Windows-specific terminology or, when necessary, provide equivalent explanations and instructions for Linux and other platforms.
  • Highlight cross-platform SDKs and tools, and ensure that any Windows-specific features (like secondary tiles) are clearly marked as such, with alternatives or notes for other platforms.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing notification payload examples for Windows platforms (Windows Store, MPNS/Windows Phone) before or instead of Linux/Android equivalents. Windows-specific XML payloads and tile templates are shown in detail, while Android (FCM) and Linux clients are only mentioned in passing, with no concrete examples or guidance. There are no Linux or Android code snippets, and the focus on Windows notification formats and tools (such as tile templates) may alienate non-Windows developers.
Recommendations:
  • Include concrete payload and template examples for Android (FCM) and other non-Windows platforms alongside Windows and iOS.
  • Present platform examples in a neutral or rotating order (e.g., iOS, Android, Windows) to avoid always listing Windows first.
  • Add sample code or configuration for Linux-based clients or cross-platform tools (e.g., curl, Python, Node.js) to demonstrate parity.
  • Avoid focusing on Windows-specific notification features (like tile templates) without providing equivalent examples or explanations for other platforms.
  • Explicitly mention that the concepts apply equally to Linux/Android and provide links or references to relevant documentation for those platforms.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing and exclusively referencing Windows-specific tools (Visual Studio, Server Explorer) for diagnostics and management tasks. There are no equivalent examples or guidance for Linux users, nor are cross-platform or command-line alternatives (such as Azure CLI, REST API, or open-source tools) highlighted alongside or before Windows tools. This may hinder Linux or non-Windows users from effectively following the troubleshooting steps.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions and screenshots for performing diagnostics and management tasks using cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI, REST API, or Azure Portal.
  • Explicitly mention and provide examples for Linux/macOS users, especially for tasks currently described only with Visual Studio or Server Explorer.
  • When referencing Visual Studio or other Windows-only tools, always provide alternative methods (e.g., using Azure CLI, REST API, or Service Bus Explorer) and present them before or alongside the Windows-specific instructions.
  • Include sample scripts or commands for common troubleshooting actions (e.g., listing registrations, sending test notifications) using cross-platform tools.
  • Clarify in each section whether the described tool or method is Windows-only, and direct users to cross-platform alternatives where available.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias, especially in the validation section, where only a Windows VM is referenced and only a PowerShell command (Resolve-DnsName) is provided for DNS validation. There are no equivalent instructions or examples for Linux users, such as using a Linux VM or common Linux DNS tools (e.g., dig, nslookup). The documentation also links only to Windows VM creation guides, omitting Linux alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel instructions for creating and using a Linux virtual machine, including a link to the official Azure Linux VM creation guide.
  • Include Linux command-line examples for DNS validation, such as using 'dig' or 'nslookup', alongside the PowerShell example.
  • When referencing VM creation, mention both Windows and Linux options, or use neutral language (e.g., 'Create a virtual machine' with links to both OS guides).
  • Ensure that all CLI and validation steps are presented in a cross-platform manner, highlighting any OS-specific differences where relevant.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Windows Heavy Examples
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a clear Windows bias by consistently presenting Windows/Windows Phone notification examples first and in greater detail, both in code and in explanatory text. The 'Get started tutorial' and linked resources are also Windows-centric. While other platforms (iOS, Android, Kindle Fire, Baidu) are mentioned and have example code, the narrative and screenshots focus heavily on Windows scenarios, and there is no mention of Linux-specific tools, environments, or considerations.
Recommendations:
  • Reorder platform examples so that Windows is not always first; consider rotating or alphabetizing platform order.
  • Add explicit Linux usage notes, such as how to run the Python sample on Linux, any required dependencies, and troubleshooting tips for Linux users.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output from Linux environments to balance the Windows-centric visuals.
  • Ensure that all platform-specific instructions (such as environment setup, debugging, or authentication) are equally detailed for Linux and macOS as for Windows.
  • Review and update linked tutorials to ensure they are not Windows-exclusive, or provide equivalent Linux/macOS guides.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Windows/Windows Phone-specific notification examples (using Windows toast XML and SendWindowsNativeNotificationAsync), with no equivalent examples for Linux, Android, or iOS platforms. Windows notification patterns and tools are mentioned exclusively, and cross-platform parity is not demonstrated.
Recommendations:
  • Add code examples for sending notifications to Android (using FCM) and iOS (using APNs) alongside the Windows examples.
  • Include sample payloads and SDK usage for non-Windows platforms to illustrate cross-platform capabilities.
  • Reorganize examples so that Windows is not always presented first; consider grouping by platform or showing all platforms equally.
  • Explicitly mention and link to documentation for sending notifications to Linux-based devices (e.g., Android) and iOS.
  • Clarify in the text that Azure Notification Hubs supports multiple platforms, not just Windows, and provide balanced coverage.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a strong Windows bias. It consistently lists Windows and Visual Studio as primary or required development environments, provides detailed steps for Windows/UWP, and omits equivalent Linux development instructions. There are no examples or guidance for running the backend or frontend on Linux, nor for using cross-platform tools or editors. References to IIS and Azure App Service (Windows) further reinforce the Windows-centric approach.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit instructions for setting up and running the backend API on Linux (e.g., using .NET Core CLI, VS Code, or JetBrains Rider).
  • Include Linux/macOS equivalents for all build and deployment steps, such as using 'dotnet build' and 'dotnet publish' instead of Visual Studio menus.
  • Document how to run the React Native manager app on Linux (if supported), or clarify platform limitations.
  • Provide troubleshooting steps for common Linux/macOS issues, not just Windows-specific errors.
  • Mention cross-platform database options or clarify how to connect to Azure SQL from Linux environments.
  • Avoid assuming Visual Studio is required; mention VS Code and other editors where possible.
  • Ensure all CLI commands (npm, npx, dotnet, etc.) are presented in a platform-agnostic way, and specify any OS-specific differences.