Service Fabric

407
Total Pages
336
Linux-Friendly Pages
71
Pages with Bias
17.4%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

1235 issues found
Showing 26-50 of 1235 flagged pages
Service Fabric Initializer CodePackages in Service Fabric ...in/articles/service-fabric/initializer-codepackages.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Initializer CodePackages in Service Fabric presents only Windows container examples, exclusively references Windows container images (nanoserver), and uses Windows-specific paths and commands (cmd, C:\ paths, echo, type, ping). There are no Linux container examples or instructions, and the ApplicationManifest and ServiceManifest are tailored to Windows environments. The 'Next steps' section does not link to Linux-specific guidance.
Recommendations
  • Add examples using Linux container images (e.g., Ubuntu, Alpine) and Linux shell commands.
  • Show how to specify Initializer CodePackages for Linux containers, including appropriate volume mounts and file paths.
  • Clarify whether Initializer CodePackages are supported for Linux containers, and if not, state this explicitly.
  • Provide parity in documentation by including both Windows and Linux container scenarios, or clearly indicate platform limitations.
  • Link to Linux container getting started guides if available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Upgrade an Azure Service Fabric standalone cluster ...ce-fabric/service-fabric-cluster-upgrade-standalone.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page on upgrading an Azure Service Fabric standalone cluster exhibits a Windows bias. References and links are primarily to Windows Server-specific documentation (e.g., 'service-fabric-cluster-upgrade-windows-server.md', 'service-fabric-cluster-config-upgrade-windows-server.md'). The Patch Orchestration Application is only discussed for Windows, and there are no explicit Linux examples or references to Linux clusters or tools. There is no mention of Linux-specific upgrade guidance or parity in examples.
Recommendations
  • Clarify early in the article whether standalone clusters and upgrade processes are Windows-only, or provide equivalent Linux guidance if Linux standalone clusters are supported.
  • If Linux standalone clusters are supported, add Linux-specific upgrade instructions, examples, and references.
  • For features like the Patch Orchestration Application, explicitly state if Linux is unsupported, or provide Linux alternatives if available.
  • Where possible, use OS-neutral language and link to both Windows and Linux documentation, or clearly indicate OS-specific sections.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy ...articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-reverseproxy.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation explicitly states that the Service Fabric reverse proxy is not available for Linux clusters, and all examples and guidance are Windows-centric. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or workarounds provided. The feature is fundamentally unavailable on Linux, and the documentation does not offer alternatives or guidance for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Clearly state at the top that reverse proxy is Windows-only, and link to any Linux alternatives or workarounds if available.
  • Provide guidance or references for Linux users on how to achieve similar functionality, if possible (e.g., using other proxy solutions or patterns).
  • Add a section explaining why the feature is unavailable on Linux and any roadmap or plans for parity, if relevant.
  • Ensure that navigation or 'Next steps' links do not mislead Linux users into thinking they can use reverse proxy on Linux clusters.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Standalone Service Fabric clusters overview ...-fabric/service-fabric-standalone-clusters-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation page initially claims Service Fabric clusters can run on Windows Server and Linux, but the 'Supported operating systems' section states that Linux isn't yet supported for standalone clusters. Security sections focus on Windows authentication and Windows security options, with no Linux-specific guidance or examples. Windows terminology and features are mentioned first and exclusively, with no Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Clarify at the top that standalone clusters are currently Windows-only, despite the initial mention of Linux.
  • Remove or revise the description to avoid implying Linux support where it does not exist.
  • Add a section explaining Linux support status and roadmap, if applicable.
  • If Linux support is planned, provide equivalent Linux examples and guidance alongside Windows instructions.
  • Ensure that security and scaling sections explicitly state Windows-only applicability, or add Linux-specific content when available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Standalone Service Fabric clusters overview ...-fabric/service-fabric-standalone-clusters-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-09 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation page initially states that Service Fabric clusters can run on Windows Server and Linux, but later clarifies that Linux isn't yet supported for standalone clusters. Most examples and security options focus on Windows-specific features, and the supported OS list is exclusively Windows. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or parity notes.
Recommendations
  • Clarify at the top that standalone clusters are currently Windows-only, despite initial mention of Linux.
  • Remove or update the description to avoid implying Linux support where it does not exist.
  • Add a section or note about Linux support roadmap or alternatives for Linux users.
  • If Linux support is planned, provide guidance or links for Linux users to relevant documentation or preview features.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy ...articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-reverseproxy.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-09 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation explicitly states that the Service Fabric reverse proxy is not available for Linux clusters, and all examples and guidance are implicitly Windows-centric. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or workarounds provided, and the feature is unavailable on Linux, creating a significant platform disparity.
Recommendations
  • Clearly state at the top that the reverse proxy feature is Windows-only, and link to any Linux alternatives or roadmap if available.
  • Provide guidance or links for Linux users on how to achieve similar functionality, or clarify that Linux clusters must use different patterns.
  • If the feature becomes available for Linux in the future, add Linux-specific examples, configuration steps, and troubleshooting guidance.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Configure the upgrade of a Service Fabric application ...abric/service-fabric-visualstudio-configure-upgrade.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-09 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on upgrading Service Fabric applications using Visual Studio and PowerShell, both Windows-centric tools. All examples and instructions reference Visual Studio dialogs and PowerShell cmdlets, with no mention of Linux/macOS alternatives or cross-platform CLI tools. There are no examples or guidance for Linux users, and Windows tools are presented first and exclusively.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions for upgrading Service Fabric applications using Azure CLI or REST API, which are cross-platform.
  • Include examples for Linux/macOS environments, such as using Bash or cross-platform tools instead of PowerShell.
  • Clarify whether Visual Studio and PowerShell are required, or if there are alternative workflows for non-Windows users.
  • Provide links to documentation for Linux-compatible Service Fabric management tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Configure the upgrade of a Service Fabric application ...abric/service-fabric-visualstudio-configure-upgrade.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-08 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation is heavily focused on Windows tooling, specifically Visual Studio and PowerShell, for configuring and upgrading Service Fabric applications. All examples and workflows are centered around Visual Studio (a Windows-only IDE) and PowerShell (with no mention of cross-platform alternatives or Linux/macOS equivalents). There are no examples or guidance for Linux/macOS users, nor are CLI or REST API alternatives discussed.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions and examples for upgrading Service Fabric applications using Azure CLI or REST API, which are cross-platform.
  • Include guidance for Linux/macOS users, such as using Service Fabric SDK tools or scripts available for those platforms.
  • Mention and link to documentation for non-Windows development environments (e.g., VS Code, CLI workflows) where applicable.
  • Clarify which steps are Windows-only and provide parity or alternatives for other OSes where possible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Initializer CodePackages in Service Fabric ...in/articles/service-fabric/initializer-codepackages.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-05 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation for Initializer CodePackages in Service Fabric is heavily focused on Windows containers. All examples use Windows container images, Windows file paths, and Windows command syntax (cmd, echo, type, ping). There is no mention of Linux container equivalents, nor are Linux examples or guidance provided. The documentation assumes the reader is deploying to Windows-based Service Fabric clusters and does not address Linux scenarios.
Recommendations
  • Add parallel examples for Linux containers, using Linux container images (e.g., Ubuntu, Alpine) and Linux command syntax (bash, echo, cat, etc.).
  • Clarify whether Initializer CodePackages are supported for Linux containers in Service Fabric. If not supported, explicitly state this limitation.
  • If Linux is supported, provide guidance on specifying Linux file paths and volume mounts, and show how to adapt the ServiceManifest and ApplicationManifest for Linux scenarios.
  • Ensure that introductory sections mention both Windows and Linux container support (if applicable), and link to relevant getting started guides for both platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy ...articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-reverseproxy.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-05 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation for Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy is Windows-focused because the reverse proxy feature is not available for Linux clusters. The page clearly states this in the Supported Platforms note. All examples and configuration guidance are therefore implicitly Windows-only, and there are no Linux equivalents or workarounds provided.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly state early in the document that reverse proxy is not available for Linux clusters, and provide links or guidance for alternative service discovery or proxying approaches for Linux clusters.
  • Where possible, suggest Linux-compatible alternatives or clarify which Service Fabric features are available on Linux.
  • Consider adding a section on how Linux users can achieve similar functionality using other tools or patterns, if feasible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Standalone Service Fabric clusters overview ...-fabric/service-fabric-standalone-clusters-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-05 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
Although the introduction claims Service Fabric clusters can run on both Windows Server and Linux, the documentation page exclusively lists Windows Server versions as supported operating systems for standalone clusters, and references Windows-specific security features and tools (Kerberos, group Managed Service Accounts, Active Directory). No Linux equivalents, examples, or instructions are provided, and Linux is explicitly stated as 'not yet supported' for standalone clusters.
Recommendations
  • Clarify in the introduction that standalone clusters are currently Windows-only, despite general Service Fabric support for Linux.
  • Remove or rephrase statements implying Linux parity for standalone clusters until Linux support is available.
  • When Linux support is added, provide equivalent Linux examples, instructions, and security guidance (e.g., certificate management, authentication methods, OS patching).
  • Explicitly state the scope of Windows-only support in the relevant sections to avoid confusion for Linux users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Configure the upgrade of a Service Fabric application ...abric/service-fabric-visualstudio-configure-upgrade.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-05 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation is heavily focused on Windows-specific tools and workflows, particularly Visual Studio and PowerShell. All upgrade instructions and examples reference Visual Studio dialogs and PowerShell cmdlets, with no mention of Linux/macOS alternatives or cross-platform CLI tools. There are no examples or guidance for performing Service Fabric application upgrades from Linux or macOS environments.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions for upgrading Service Fabric applications using cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI or Service Fabric CLI (sfctl), where possible.
  • Include examples for Linux/macOS users, such as command-line workflows that do not require Visual Studio or PowerShell.
  • Clarify which steps are Windows-only and provide alternative approaches for non-Windows environments.
  • Reference documentation for Service Fabric management from Linux/macOS, if available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Configure the upgrade of a Service Fabric application ...abric/service-fabric-visualstudio-configure-upgrade.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-04 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation focuses on upgrading Service Fabric applications using Visual Studio and PowerShell, both of which are primarily Windows tools. All examples and instructions are given for Visual Studio (Windows-only) and PowerShell (Windows-centric), with no mention of Linux/macOS alternatives or cross-platform CLI tools. There are no instructions or examples for upgrading Service Fabric applications from Linux/macOS environments, nor is there guidance for using Service Fabric CLI or REST APIs.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions for upgrading Service Fabric applications using Service Fabric CLI (sfctl), which is cross-platform.
  • Include examples for Linux/macOS users, such as using sfctl or REST API calls to perform upgrades.
  • Clarify which steps are Windows-only and provide parity guidance for non-Windows environments.
  • Mention prerequisites or limitations for Linux/macOS users, and link to relevant documentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy ...articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-reverseproxy.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-04 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy is Windows-focused, as the reverse proxy feature is explicitly stated to be unavailable for Linux clusters. All examples, configuration details, and usage instructions are implicitly for Windows clusters only, with no Linux equivalents or alternatives provided.
Recommendations
  • Clearly state at the top of the page that reverse proxy is not available for Linux clusters, and link to alternative approaches for Linux users if available.
  • Provide guidance or references for Linux cluster users on how to achieve similar service discovery and communication patterns without the reverse proxy.
  • If/when Linux support is added, update documentation to include Linux-specific setup, configuration, and usage examples.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Standalone Service Fabric clusters overview ...-fabric/service-fabric-standalone-clusters-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-04 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
Although the introduction claims Service Fabric clusters can run on both Windows Server and Linux, the documentation page exclusively lists Windows Server versions as supported operating systems and provides security configuration details only for Windows environments (e.g., Kerberos, Active Directory, group Managed Service Accounts). No Linux-specific instructions, examples, or supported Linux OS versions are mentioned, and Windows tools/patterns are referenced without Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Clarify the current Linux support status: If Linux is not yet supported for standalone clusters, state this clearly at the top and remove references to Linux in the introduction.
  • If Linux support is planned or available elsewhere, add a dedicated section for Linux setup, supported distributions, and security configuration.
  • Provide Linux-specific examples for cluster creation, security (certificate management), and scaling/upgrading operations.
  • Mention Linux tools and patterns (e.g., OpenSSL for certificates, Linux user/group management) alongside Windows equivalents.
  • Ensure that all references to Windows-specific technologies (Kerberos, AD, group Managed Service Accounts) are marked as Windows-only and, where possible, provide Linux alternatives.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy ...articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-reverseproxy.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-03 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy clearly states that reverse proxy is not available for Linux clusters, and all examples, instructions, and references are Windows-centric. There are no Linux equivalents or alternative guidance for Linux users, and the page assumes a Windows environment throughout.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly clarify at the top of the page that reverse proxy is a Windows-only feature, and provide links to Linux alternatives or workarounds if available.
  • Add guidance for Linux users on how to achieve similar functionality, or direct them to supported Service Fabric features for Linux clusters.
  • Consider splitting documentation so that Windows-only features are clearly separated from cross-platform features, reducing confusion for Linux/macOS users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Standalone Service Fabric clusters overview ...-fabric/service-fabric-standalone-clusters-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-03 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows Only Missing Linux Example
Summary
Although the page introduction claims Service Fabric clusters run on both Windows Server and Linux, the 'Supported operating systems' section explicitly states that Linux isn't yet supported for standalone clusters. All examples, recommendations, and security patterns reference Windows Server and Windows-specific features (Kerberos, Active Directory, group Managed Service Accounts), with no Linux equivalents or guidance. This creates a strong Windows bias, and Linux users cannot deploy standalone clusters following this documentation.
Recommendations
  • Clarify in the introduction that standalone clusters are currently Windows-only, and Linux support is not available yet.
  • Remove or update the misleading statement in the description about Linux support.
  • If Linux support is planned, provide a timeline or link to relevant tracking issues.
  • Once Linux support is available, add Linux-specific instructions, examples, and security guidance.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Initializer CodePackages in Service Fabric ...in/articles/service-fabric/initializer-codepackages.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-02 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation for Initializer CodePackages in Service Fabric is heavily focused on Windows containers. All examples use Windows container images, Windows file paths, and Windows command syntax (cmd.exe). There are no Linux container examples, nor is there any mention of how to use Initializer CodePackages with Linux containers or Linux file systems. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows container development and does not provide Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent examples using Linux containers (e.g., Ubuntu or Alpine images) with Linux shell commands and file paths.
  • Clarify whether Initializer CodePackages are supported for Linux containers, and if so, provide guidance and examples.
  • If there are limitations or differences for Linux containers, explicitly document them.
  • Present both Windows and Linux examples side-by-side where possible to improve accessibility for non-Windows users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Standalone Service Fabric clusters overview ...-fabric/service-fabric-standalone-clusters-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-02 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
Although the introduction claims Service Fabric clusters can run on both Windows Server and Linux, the documentation and the 'Supported operating systems' section clarify that Linux is not yet supported for standalone clusters. The security sections reference Windows-specific features (Kerberos, Active Directory, group Managed Service Accounts), and there are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or tools mentioned. Windows tools and patterns are referenced exclusively, and Linux is only mentioned as a future possibility.
Recommendations
  • Clarify Linux support status earlier in the document to avoid confusion.
  • Add a prominent note at the top stating that standalone clusters are currently Windows-only.
  • Remove or rephrase references to Linux in the introduction and description until Linux support is available.
  • When Linux support is added, provide equivalent Linux examples, instructions, and security guidance.
  • Consider linking to Service Fabric on Linux documentation (if available) for users interested in non-Windows deployments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy ...articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-reverseproxy.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-02 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy is Windows-focused, as the reverse proxy feature is explicitly stated to be unavailable for Linux clusters. All examples, configuration instructions, and usage scenarios assume a Windows environment, with no Linux equivalents or alternatives provided.
Recommendations
  • Clearly state at the beginning of the documentation that reverse proxy is not available for Linux clusters, and provide links or guidance for Linux users on alternative approaches for service discovery and communication.
  • If possible, mention any roadmap or plans for Linux support, or direct Linux users to relevant Service Fabric features that are available on Linux.
  • Consider adding a comparison table or section outlining feature parity and limitations between Windows and Linux clusters for Service Fabric networking and reverse proxy capabilities.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy ...articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-reverseproxy.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-01 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy is Windows-focused, as the reverse proxy is explicitly stated to be unavailable for Linux clusters. All examples, configuration guidance, and usage scenarios assume a Windows environment, with no Linux equivalents or workarounds provided.
Recommendations
  • Clearly state at the top of the documentation that reverse proxy is not supported on Linux clusters and link to any alternative approaches for Linux users.
  • Provide guidance or references for Linux users on how to achieve similar service discovery and HTTP routing, if possible, using other Service Fabric features or third-party tools.
  • Update related documentation to clarify platform support for reverse proxy and suggest migration paths or alternatives for Linux clusters.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Standalone Service Fabric clusters overview ...-fabric/service-fabric-standalone-clusters-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-01 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows Only Missing Linux Example
Summary
Although the introduction claims Service Fabric clusters can run on both Windows Server and Linux, the documentation later states that Linux isn't yet supported for standalone clusters. All examples, operating system lists, and security options are Windows-centric, with no Linux instructions or parity. This creates confusion for Linux users and makes the documentation effectively Windows-only.
Recommendations
  • Clarify at the top of the page that standalone Service Fabric clusters are currently Windows-only, and Linux support is not available.
  • Remove or update the description to avoid implying Linux support where it does not exist.
  • Add a section explaining the roadmap or alternatives for Linux users, if applicable.
  • Ensure that all examples and instructions are clearly marked as Windows-specific to avoid misleading Linux/macOS users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Standalone Service Fabric clusters overview ...-fabric/service-fabric-standalone-clusters-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-31 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
Although the introduction claims Service Fabric clusters can run on both Windows Server and Linux, the documentation and feature list are exclusively focused on Windows Server. All supported operating systems listed are Windows-only, and security sections reference Windows-specific tools (Active Directory, Kerberos, group Managed Service Accounts) without Linux equivalents or guidance. No Linux examples, instructions, or supported OS versions are provided.
Recommendations
  • Clarify in the introduction that Linux support is not available for standalone clusters, or update the documentation to include Linux instructions and supported OS versions if/when Linux support is added.
  • If Linux support is planned, provide equivalent security guidance for Linux clusters (e.g., certificate management, authentication options, Linux user/service accounts).
  • Explicitly state the current Windows-only limitation in the 'Supported operating systems' section to avoid confusion.
  • Remove or update the description to accurately reflect the current platform support.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy ...articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-reverseproxy.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-31 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page for Azure Service Fabric reverse proxy is Windows-focused, as the reverse proxy feature is explicitly stated to be unavailable for Linux clusters. All examples, configuration details, and usage scenarios assume a Windows environment, with no Linux equivalents or alternatives provided. This creates a notable barrier for Linux users, who cannot use the reverse proxy feature at all.
Recommendations
  • Clearly state at the top of the documentation that reverse proxy is not available for Linux clusters, and provide guidance or links to alternative service discovery and communication patterns for Linux-based Service Fabric clusters.
  • If possible, mention any roadmap or workarounds for Linux users, or direct them to relevant documentation for Linux-compatible approaches.
  • Consider adding a comparison table or section outlining feature parity between Windows and Linux clusters for Service Fabric, so users can quickly assess platform limitations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Configure the upgrade of a Service Fabric application ...abric/service-fabric-visualstudio-configure-upgrade.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-31 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page focuses exclusively on configuring Service Fabric application upgrades using Visual Studio and PowerShell, both of which are Windows-centric tools. All examples and instructions assume use of Visual Studio (Windows-only) and PowerShell (primarily Windows, though available on Linux with limitations). There is no mention of Linux/macOS workflows, CLI alternatives, or cross-platform tools for upgrading Service Fabric applications.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions and examples for upgrading Service Fabric applications using Azure CLI or REST API, which are cross-platform.
  • Clarify whether Service Fabric application upgrades can be performed from Linux/macOS environments and, if so, provide relevant guidance.
  • If Visual Studio and PowerShell are required, explicitly state that these instructions are Windows-specific and link to any available cross-platform alternatives.
  • Include a section or links for Linux/macOS users on how to perform equivalent upgrade operations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 2 of 50 Next →