Service Fabric

407
Total Pages
336
Linux-Friendly Pages
71
Pages with Bias
17.4%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

1305 issues found
Showing 201-225 of 1305 flagged pages
Service Fabric Service Fabric Cluster Resource Manager: Movement cost ...ps://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-compute-docs/blob/main/articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-cluster-resource-manager-movement-cost.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page provides PowerShell examples for configuring move cost in Service Fabric, but does not include equivalent Linux/bash/CLI examples. PowerShell is a Windows-centric tool, and its exclusive use creates friction for Linux/macOS users. Additionally, PowerShell examples are presented before C# code samples, reinforcing Windows-first bias. There is no mention of Azure CLI, REST API, or bash alternatives for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Add Azure CLI examples for configuring and updating move cost, if supported.
  • Include bash or shell script equivalents for PowerShell commands.
  • Mention REST API options for cross-platform usage.
  • Present Windows and Linux/macOS examples side-by-side or alternate their order.
  • Clarify if certain operations are only possible via PowerShell, and provide guidance for Linux users if so.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Application lifecycle in Service Fabric ...service-fabric/service-fabric-application-lifecycle.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation frequently references PowerShell cmdlets and Windows-specific tooling (e.g., Remove-ServiceFabricApplicationPackage, Register-ServiceFabricApplicationType) alongside .NET APIs and REST operations. PowerShell examples and cmdlets are consistently mentioned before or alongside REST and .NET methods, but Linux-native CLI equivalents (such as sfctl or Azure CLI) are not directly referenced in the main lifecycle steps. The only explicit cross-platform mention is an include link to 'service-fabric-sfctl.md', but no concrete sfctl or Azure CLI commands are shown in the main sections. This creates friction for Linux/macOS users, who must infer or search for their own equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit examples and references for sfctl and Azure CLI commands in each lifecycle phase (deploy, upgrade, remove, etc.), not just as a sidebar link.
  • Where PowerShell cmdlets are listed, also list the equivalent sfctl or Azure CLI command immediately alongside.
  • Clarify which tools are cross-platform and which are Windows-only, especially for operators and administrators.
  • Consider providing sample command sequences for Linux/macOS users in critical sections.
  • Review and update the 'Preserving disk space' and 'Cleaning up files' sections to include sfctl/Azure CLI equivalents where possible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Application upgrade: upgrade parameters ...abric/service-fabric-application-upgrade-parameters.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page gives prominence to Windows-centric tools (PowerShell and Visual Studio) by listing them first and providing detailed parameter tables for these tools before mentioning cross-platform alternatives like SFCTL. The PowerShell and Visual Studio sections are more extensive and appear before SFCTL, which is the primary CLI for Linux/macOS users. Examples and parameter descriptions are often PowerShell-focused, and Linux-specific guidance is less detailed.
Recommendations
  • Reorder the tools section to list SFCTL (Service Fabric CLI) alongside PowerShell and Visual Studio, or even before them, to emphasize cross-platform parity.
  • Expand the SFCTL section to include more detailed parameter tables and usage examples, matching the depth provided for PowerShell and Visual Studio.
  • Add explicit Linux/macOS examples and clarify which tools are recommended for each platform.
  • Where PowerShell-specific syntax is shown (e.g., hashtables), provide equivalent SFCTL JSON examples.
  • Ensure that all parameters described for PowerShell/Visual Studio are also mapped to SFCTL, noting any differences or limitations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Understanding periodic backup configuration ...-fabric-backuprestoreservice-configure-periodic-backup.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page primarily describes Service Fabric's periodic backup configuration in a platform-neutral manner, but the only example for on-premises backup storage is a Windows-style file share path (\\StorageServer\BackupStore) and references Integrated Windows Authentication. There are no examples or guidance for Linux-based file shares (such as NFS or SMB mounts on Linux), nor is there mention of Linux authentication patterns. This creates friction for Linux users of standalone Service Fabric clusters who wish to use on-premises backup storage.
Recommendations
  • Add examples and guidance for configuring file share backup storage using Linux-based file shares (e.g., NFS or SMB mounts) and authentication methods suitable for Linux environments.
  • Clarify whether Linux-based Service Fabric clusters can use file share backup storage, and if so, provide sample paths and credential usage for Linux.
  • If file share backup storage is Windows-only, explicitly state this limitation to avoid confusion for Linux users.
  • Consider including both Windows and Linux file share path formats and authentication options in the documentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric infrastructure as Code Best Practices ...tps://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-compute-docs/blob/main/articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-best-practices-infrastructure-as-code.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and PowerShell examples for deploying Resource Manager templates, but PowerShell is featured prominently and exclusively for cluster upgrade operations. Windows-specific registry keys and template properties are discussed for disabling Windows Update, with no equivalent Linux guidance. Upgrade instructions rely on PowerShell, omitting Linux shell or cross-platform alternatives. Windows configuration details are presented before Linux, and some sections lack Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux shell (bash) examples for cluster upgrade operations, especially where PowerShell is currently the only option.
  • Include guidance for disabling automatic updates on Linux VMs (e.g., using cloud-init or OS-specific package managers).
  • Provide parity in upgrade instructions for Linux clusters, including references to .deb package handling and relevant commands.
  • Where possible, present cross-platform tools (Azure CLI, REST API) before platform-specific tools like PowerShell.
  • Clarify when instructions are Windows-only and provide links or notes to Linux equivalents.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Capacity planning and scaling for Azure Service Fabric ...bric/service-fabric-best-practices-capacity-scaling.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides numerous PowerShell-based manual scaling instructions and references Windows-centric tooling (e.g., PowerShell cmdlets like Disable-ServiceFabricNode, Get-ServiceFabricNode, Remove-ServiceFabricNodeState) without offering equivalent Linux/bash/CLI examples. Windows/PowerShell instructions are presented first and exclusively in critical workflow sections, creating friction for Linux users. While Service Fabric supports Linux clusters, the guidance for scaling and node management is heavily Windows-biased.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Azure CLI or bash examples for scaling operations, including node disablement/removal and cluster management.
  • Clearly indicate which PowerShell commands are available on Linux (via PowerShell Core) or provide alternative commands/scripts for Linux environments.
  • Add Linux-specific guidance for manual scaling, including references to Service Fabric CLI (sfctl) or REST API usage.
  • Ensure that both Windows and Linux cluster creation and management workflows are equally documented and accessible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric networking best practices ...ice-fabric/service-fabric-best-practices-networking.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides several Windows/PowerShell-centric examples and references, such as mentioning PowerShell APIs and Azure DevOps classic PowerShell tasks, and links to Windows-specific ARM templates. Windows terminology and tools are often referenced before Linux equivalents, and some examples (like network port usage and tooling) are Windows-focused. Linux is mentioned, but Linux-specific examples and guidance are less detailed or appear after Windows content.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux CLI examples alongside PowerShell examples, especially for cluster management and networking tasks.
  • Ensure Linux-specific ARM templates and sample links are included and referenced equally.
  • Clarify when port ranges or tooling differ for Linux clusters (e.g., ephemeral ports, client APIs).
  • Add more Linux-focused guidance for Azure DevOps and application networking scenarios.
  • Balance the order of Windows and Linux references in sections and tables.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Service Fabric Cluster Resource Manager - Application Groups ...ice-fabric-cluster-resource-manager-application-groups.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page provides only PowerShell and C# examples for managing Service Fabric Application Groups. PowerShell is a Windows-centric tool, and no Linux/macOS CLI equivalents (such as Azure CLI, Bash, or REST API examples) are provided. This creates friction for Linux/macOS users who may not have access to PowerShell or prefer cross-platform tools.
Recommendations
  • Add Azure CLI examples for all operations shown (application creation, updating, querying load, removing capacity).
  • Include REST API sample calls for relevant actions, as these are platform-agnostic.
  • Mention if PowerShell cmdlets are available cross-platform (PowerShell Core), or clarify Windows-only limitations.
  • Consider Bash scripting examples if relevant.
  • Explicitly state any limitations or differences for Linux clusters, if applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric security best practices ...rvice-fabric/service-fabric-best-practices-security.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides both Windows and Linux examples for key security tasks, such as encrypting secrets, but Windows examples (PowerShell) are presented first and in greater detail. Windows-specific tools and features like Windows Defender and Azure Desired State Configuration (DSC) are discussed without Linux equivalents or alternatives. Some sections, such as Windows security baselines and Windows Defender, are inherently Windows-focused, but the overall structure tends to prioritize Windows tools and patterns before Linux ones.
Recommendations
  • Present Linux and Windows examples side-by-side or alternate their order to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Where Windows-specific tools (e.g., Windows Defender, DSC) are mentioned, provide Linux alternatives or explicitly state their absence and recommend best practices for Linux clusters.
  • Expand Linux-specific guidance where possible, such as referencing common Linux security baselines or antimalware solutions.
  • Ensure parity in detail and clarity between Windows and Linux instructions, especially for certificate and secret management.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Node types and virtual machine scale sets ...les/service-fabric/service-fabric-cluster-nodetypes.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides some Windows-centric details, such as using Windows-style file paths (e.g., 'D:\\SvcFab') in JSON configuration examples and referencing RDP port changes and admin username/password updates, which are Windows-specific tasks. There is a lack of explicit Linux/macOS examples or guidance, especially for connecting to nodes or configuring Service Fabric on Linux. The extension configuration does mention 'ServiceFabricLinuxNode', but practical Linux usage is not demonstrated.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux/macOS examples for connecting to cluster nodes (e.g., SSH instructions alongside RDP).
  • Include Linux-style file paths (e.g., '/var/svcfab') in configuration examples or clarify that the path should match the OS.
  • Provide guidance or links for updating Linux admin credentials and port ranges, not just Windows/RDP.
  • Ensure parity in 'Next steps' by referencing Linux-relevant scripts or documentation where available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric Auto Scaling Services and Containers ...ttps://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-compute-docs/blob/main/articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-cluster-resource-manager-autoscaling.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides detailed examples for configuring auto scaling in Azure Service Fabric using Application Manifest, C# APIs, and PowerShell. All CLI examples are PowerShell-based, with no Linux shell (bash/CLI) equivalents. PowerShell is presented as the only scripting option, and there is no mention of Linux-native tools or commands. While Service Fabric supports Linux containers, the documentation does not show how Linux users can perform these tasks, creating friction for non-Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent bash/CLI examples for Linux users alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Clarify which steps or commands are cross-platform and which are Windows-only.
  • Mention and link to Linux-specific tooling or documentation where relevant.
  • Explicitly state PowerShell requirements and provide alternatives for Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Describe a cluster by using Cluster Resource Manager ...ce-fabric-cluster-resource-manager-cluster-description.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation provides configuration examples for both Windows (ClusterManifest.xml) and cross-platform/standalone (ClusterConfig.json) deployments. However, code samples for service creation and updates are given in C# and PowerShell only, with PowerShell shown as the only CLI example. The XML configuration is labeled as <WindowsServer>, and PowerShell is a Windows-centric tool, which may create friction for Linux/macOS users who typically use Bash or other CLI tools. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples or references to Linux-native tools or shell commands.
Recommendations
  • Add CLI examples using Azure CLI or Bash scripts for service creation and updates, especially for standalone and Linux clusters.
  • Clarify whether ClusterManifest.xml applies only to Windows or if there is an equivalent for Linux clusters.
  • Include references to Linux/macOS environments where applicable, and note any differences in configuration or tooling.
  • If PowerShell is required for certain operations, mention alternatives or limitations for Linux/macOS users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Cluster Resource Manager - Management Integration ...fabric-cluster-resource-manager-management-integration.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides a PowerShell example (Get-ServiceFabricPartitionHealth) for querying health reports, but does not include equivalent examples for Linux/macOS users (e.g., using sfctl or REST API). The only command-line example is Windows/PowerShell-specific, and there is no mention of Linux tooling or cross-platform alternatives for cluster management tasks.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent examples using sfctl (the cross-platform Service Fabric CLI) for querying partition health and other management tasks.
  • Mention REST API options for health queries, which are platform-agnostic.
  • Where PowerShell examples are given, provide Linux/macOS alternatives alongside or immediately after.
  • Clarify in the text that management tasks can be performed from any OS using sfctl or REST APIs, not just via PowerShell.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Manage Azure Service Fabric app load using metrics ...ric/service-fabric-cluster-resource-manager-metrics.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides code examples for C# and PowerShell, but omits equivalent Linux/macOS CLI examples (e.g., Azure CLI or REST API). PowerShell is presented as the primary scripting interface for service management, which is Windows-centric. There is no mention of Linux-native tools or cross-platform command-line alternatives, and PowerShell examples are given before any discussion of possible Linux approaches.
Recommendations
  • Add Azure CLI examples for service creation and metric configuration, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux/macOS.
  • Mention REST API endpoints for programmatic metric management, providing links or example requests.
  • Clarify whether PowerShell examples are usable on Linux (via PowerShell Core), and if so, provide guidance; otherwise, recommend cross-platform alternatives.
  • Ensure that scripting and automation guidance is not Windows-centric by including Linux/macOS-friendly workflows.
  • Consider including bash or shell script snippets for relevant tasks.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Secure an Azure Service Fabric cluster ...cles/service-fabric/service-fabric-cluster-security.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page on securing an Azure Service Fabric cluster exhibits a moderate Windows bias. Windows Server clusters and Windows authentication methods are mentioned frequently and often before Linux equivalents. Several sections (e.g., node-to-node and client-to-node security) provide links and guidance specifically for Windows standalone clusters, but do not offer equivalent Linux standalone cluster instructions or examples. Windows certificate creation tools and Windows Server certificate services are referenced, while Linux certificate management approaches are absent.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit guidance and links for securing standalone Linux Service Fabric clusters, including certificate setup and authentication methods.
  • Provide Linux-focused examples for certificate creation and management (e.g., using OpenSSL or Linux CA tools) alongside Windows examples.
  • Mention Linux authentication options or clarify if only certificate-based security is supported for Linux clusters.
  • Ensure parity in recommendations and best practices for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Where Windows tools (e.g., MakeCert.exe) are referenced, suggest Linux alternatives or note their applicability.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric application resource model ...ervice-fabric/service-fabric-concept-resource-model.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates notable Windows bias. All deployment and deletion examples use PowerShell cmdlets (New-AzResourceGroupDeployment, Get-AzResource, Remove-AzResource) without any Azure CLI or Bash equivalents. Application packaging is described using Visual Studio, a Windows-centric tool, with no mention of cross-platform alternatives. There are no Linux/macOS-specific instructions or examples, and Windows tools and patterns are presented exclusively and first.
Recommendations
  • Add Azure CLI examples for deployment and deletion alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Describe application packaging using cross-platform tools (e.g., dotnet CLI, SF tooling, or manual zip commands) instead of only Visual Studio.
  • Include Bash or shell scripting examples for relevant steps (e.g., uploading to blob storage).
  • Clearly indicate if Visual Studio is optional and provide alternatives for Linux/macOS users.
  • Present Windows and Linux/macOS instructions in parallel or note platform-specific differences.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric dynamic node tags ...tps://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-compute-docs/blob/main/articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-cluster-resource-manager-node-tagging.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides PowerShell examples for managing node tags and service requirements, but does not include equivalent examples for Linux/macOS users (e.g., Bash, CLI, or REST). PowerShell is presented first and exclusively as the command-line option, which creates friction for non-Windows users.
Recommendations
  • Add Azure CLI or Bash examples for managing node tags and service requirements, if supported.
  • Include REST API usage examples for node tag operations, as REST is cross-platform.
  • Clarify whether PowerShell commands are available on Linux/macOS (via PowerShell Core), and provide guidance if so.
  • Present cross-platform command-line options (CLI, REST) before or alongside PowerShell to ensure parity.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Upgrade an Azure Service Fabric standalone cluster ...ce-fabric/service-fabric-cluster-upgrade-standalone.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page frequently references Windows-specific upgrade and configuration guides (e.g., 'service-fabric-cluster-upgrade-windows-server.md', 'service-fabric-cluster-config-upgrade-windows-server.md'), and the patch orchestration application is described only for Windows. There are no Linux-specific examples, tools, or references, and Windows terminology is used exclusively or first throughout the page.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Linux upgrade and configuration documentation links where available.
  • Clarify whether Service Fabric standalone clusters are supported on Linux, and if so, provide Linux-specific instructions and examples.
  • Mention Linux patch orchestration options or explicitly state if POA is Windows-only.
  • Ensure that references to configuration files and procedures are platform-neutral or provide both Windows and Linux variants.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Upgrading Azure Service Fabric clusters ...icles/service-fabric/service-fabric-cluster-upgrade.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides upgrade guidance for Azure Service Fabric clusters and generally avoids platform-specific instructions. However, in the 'Upgrading OS images for cluster nodes' section, it refers only to patching Windows operating systems and links exclusively to Windows-specific guidance. Additionally, throughout the document, PowerShell is mentioned as a tool for managing certificates and ports, but Linux equivalents (such as Bash or Azure CLI usage on Linux/macOS) are not explicitly shown or referenced. There are no Linux-specific examples or clear parity in tool recommendations.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit guidance and links for patching/upgrading Linux-based Service Fabric clusters, if supported.
  • When mentioning PowerShell, also reference Azure CLI usage on Linux/macOS, and provide example commands for both platforms.
  • Clarify if certain features (like Patch Orchestration Application) are Windows-only, or provide Linux alternatives if available.
  • Ensure that all management actions (certificates, ports, node properties) include cross-platform instructions or links.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Scalability of Service Fabric services .../service-fabric/service-fabric-concepts-scalability.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page provides code examples and administrative instructions primarily using PowerShell, which is a Windows-centric tool. There are no equivalent Linux CLI or bash examples, nor are Linux-native tools or patterns mentioned. PowerShell commands are presented alongside C# code, but Linux users are left without clear guidance for performing equivalent actions. The 'Choosing a platform' section does mention Linux-specific implementation differences, but does not provide Linux-specific operational examples.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux CLI/bash examples for administrative tasks such as creating/updating services and application instances.
  • Mention and link to Linux-native Service Fabric management tools (e.g., sfctl) where PowerShell is referenced.
  • Present examples for both Windows and Linux platforms, or clarify when a command is Windows-only.
  • Where possible, provide parity in documentation structure so Linux users can follow along without friction.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Learn more about Azure Service Fabric ...icles/service-fabric/service-fabric-content-roadmap.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides a broad overview of Azure Service Fabric, which supports both Windows and Linux. However, there is a noticeable Windows bias: Windows-specific tools (e.g., PowerShell, Visual Studio) are mentioned before Linux equivalents, and Windows terminology (e.g., Windows service, FabricHost.exe) is used throughout. Standalone cluster creation is only described for Windows, with Linux standalone clusters explicitly not supported. Examples and instructions often reference Windows tools and patterns, with Linux alternatives sometimes missing or relegated to secondary mentions.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-specific examples and instructions alongside Windows ones, especially for cluster creation, management, and health monitoring.
  • Mention Linux CLI tools (e.g., sfctl) and scripting options before or alongside Windows PowerShell.
  • Clarify which features are cross-platform and which are Windows-only, and link to Linux-specific guides where available.
  • Add parity in 'Next steps' and throughout the page by including Linux-focused tutorials and quickstarts.
  • Where Windows tools (e.g., Visual Studio) are referenced, also mention Linux-friendly alternatives (e.g., VS Code, CLI).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric hosting activation and deactivation life cycle ...les/service-fabric/service-fabric-hosting-lifecycle.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation page describes the Service Fabric hosting activation and deactivation lifecycle in a platform-neutral manner, but the 'Next steps' section and some linked examples reference PowerShell and Windows-centric tools without mentioning Linux equivalents. There are no explicit Linux/bash examples or references to Linux tools, and PowerShell is presented as the primary method for deploying and removing applications.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux/bash CLI examples alongside PowerShell examples for deployment and removal tasks.
  • Update 'Next steps' to include links to Linux-specific documentation or Azure CLI instructions.
  • Where PowerShell is referenced, clarify if equivalent functionality exists on Linux and provide guidance.
  • Ensure that references to tools (such as 'copy-servicefabricservicepackagetonode') mention cross-platform alternatives if available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Manage apps for multiple environments ...e-fabric-manage-multiple-environment-app-configuration.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 2 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First
Summary
The documentation provides examples for managing application parameters in Azure Service Fabric, with a notable emphasis on Windows/PowerShell tools. PowerShell is mentioned first and in detail, while Linux tools (sfctl) are referenced but with less prominence. Visual Studio and PowerShell scripts are highlighted, both of which are primarily Windows-centric. There are no explicit Linux/macOS examples or equivalent workflows shown for parameter files or deployment scripts.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux/macOS examples, such as using sfctl and shell scripts for parameter passing and deployment.
  • Provide parity in example ordering: mention sfctl (Linux/macOS) before or alongside PowerShell.
  • Include guidance for managing parameter files and deployments from non-Windows environments.
  • Clarify which tools are cross-platform and which are Windows-only, to help users choose appropriate workflows.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric container application manifest examples ...abric/service-fabric-manifest-example-container-app.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a notable Windows bias. All manifest examples are based on the Windows Server 2016 Container Sample, and several instructions reference Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., using 'winver' to get the OS build version, Windows-style file paths, and references to PFX certificates). There is no mention of Linux-based Service Fabric clusters, Linux containers, or Linux-specific manifest considerations. The documentation does not provide Linux-oriented examples or guidance, which may hinder Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Provide parallel examples or guidance for Linux-based Service Fabric clusters and Linux containers, including sample manifests and configuration notes.
  • When referencing OS build versions, include Linux equivalents or clarify how to handle image selection for Linux containers.
  • Use platform-neutral file paths in examples, or show both Windows and Linux path formats where relevant.
  • Clarify which features or manifest elements are Windows-only and which are cross-platform.
  • Link to Linux container documentation or samples where available.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Service Fabric Azure Service Fabric DNS service ...n/articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-dnsservice.md
Medium Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-02-18 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation provides PowerShell examples for setting DNS names, but does not offer equivalent Linux CLI (e.g., Bash, Azure CLI) examples. Windows tools and patterns (PowerShell, ApplicationManifest.xml in Visual Studio) are mentioned before or instead of Linux alternatives. While the page notes Linux support is limited, Linux users are left without clear guidance for common tasks, creating friction.
Recommendations
  • Add Azure CLI or Bash examples for setting DNS names and managing Service Fabric services on Linux clusters.
  • Clarify how Linux users can accomplish tasks shown in PowerShell (e.g., using REST API, Azure CLI, or other tools).
  • Mention and link to Linux-specific tooling or workflows where relevant (e.g., Docker Compose, YAML manifests).
  • Explicitly state any limitations or alternative approaches for Linux users in sections where Windows-only tools are referenced.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 9 of 53 Next →