267
Total Pages
250
Linux-Friendly Pages
17
Pages with Bias
6.4%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues (25)

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows/Azure-centric bias by exclusively referencing Azure portal UI workflows, Azure CLI commands, and Azure Fileshare for storage operations, all of which are primarily oriented toward Windows or Azure environments. There are no examples or guidance for Linux-native workflows (e.g., using SCP, rsync, or Linux shell commands for uploading files), nor are there any mentions of Linux-specific tools or patterns for deploying or managing the agent. The documentation assumes the user is operating within the Azure ecosystem, which is more closely aligned with Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Linux-native command-line examples for uploading the Elastic APM Java Agent to persistent storage (e.g., using azcopy, scp, or rsync from a Linux shell).
  • Include alternative instructions for users managing deployments from Linux or macOS environments, such as using Bash scripts or Linux CLI tools.
  • Mention cross-platform considerations explicitly, clarifying that the Azure CLI and related commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide any OS-specific caveats.
  • Add screenshots or text-based examples that show how to perform key steps (such as uploading files) using Linux command-line tools, not just the Azure portal UI.
  • Where possible, provide parity in automation examples (e.g., show how to automate with shell scripts or Linux-native CI/CD tools in addition to Azure-native templates).

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation instructs users to use the Azure portal (a web-based GUI) to delete a resource group, which is a method commonly associated with Windows workflows. There are no examples or instructions for performing the same task using command-line tools such as Azure CLI or PowerShell, which would be more platform-agnostic and accessible to Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Add instructions for deleting a resource group using Azure CLI, which works on both Windows and Linux.
  • Provide PowerShell examples as an alternative, but ensure CLI examples are given equal or higher prominence.
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal is accessible from any OS, but supplement with command-line options for users who prefer or require them.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows/Azure portal-centric approach, with all instructions and UI navigation steps tailored to the Azure portal interface. There are no command-line examples (neither PowerShell nor CLI), but also no Linux-specific or cross-platform instructions. The documentation assumes use of the Azure portal, which is platform-agnostic in theory, but in practice, this approach often aligns with Windows-centric workflows and omits Linux CLI or automation alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Provide Azure CLI examples for all steps that can be performed via command line (e.g., app registration, adding redirect URIs, creating client secrets), ensuring parity for users on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Include references to automation or scripting options (such as Azure CLI or REST API) alongside portal instructions.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed on any OS using the Azure portal, but highlight CLI alternatives for users who prefer or require non-GUI workflows.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux users, pointing to relevant CLI documentation or scripts.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting PowerShell instructions alongside Azure CLI, but omits explicit Linux shell (bash) examples. The PowerShell example is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and there is no mention of Linux-specific considerations or tools. The instructions for deleting resources use PowerShell and Azure CLI, but the CLI example is written generically and does not clarify that it is intended for bash or Linux users. No Linux-specific screenshots, commands, or troubleshooting notes are provided.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly label the Azure CLI example as 'Bash/Linux/macOS' to clarify its cross-platform applicability.
  • Add a note that Azure CLI commands can be run on Windows, Linux, or macOS, and provide links to installation instructions for each OS.
  • If possible, provide bash-specific examples or troubleshooting notes for common Linux environments.
  • Ensure that any references to PowerShell are balanced with bash shell equivalents, especially for scripting or automation tasks.
  • Consider including a table or section that summarizes command-line options for Windows (PowerShell), Linux (bash), and macOS users.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation consistently provides command-line examples using Azure CLI and bash-style syntax (e.g., export, $(...), jq), which are compatible with Linux/macOS and Windows with WSL or Git Bash. However, there are no explicit examples or notes for Windows users using native Command Prompt or PowerShell, nor are there instructions for installing required tools (like jq) on Windows. The documentation implicitly assumes a Unix-like shell environment, which may disadvantage Windows users who do not use WSL or similar tools.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit notes or sections for Windows users, clarifying how to run the commands in PowerShell or Command Prompt, or recommend using WSL or Git Bash.
  • Provide Windows-native equivalents for commands that use Unix utilities (e.g., using jq, export, $(...), and piping). For example, show how to set environment variables and parse JSON in PowerShell.
  • Include installation instructions for required tools (like jq and Azure CLI) specifically for Windows, with links to Windows installers.
  • Where possible, provide both bash and PowerShell command examples side-by-side, or indicate which shell is required for each example.
  • Add a 'Platform compatibility' note in the prerequisites, clarifying the expected shell environment and alternatives for Windows users.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias by exclusively providing PowerShell-based automation examples for interacting with Palo Alto REST APIs and for Azure CLI usage. There are no equivalent Bash/shell or Linux-native scripting examples. The instructions assume the user is running commands in a PowerShell environment, which is native to Windows and only optionally available on Linux/macOS. This may create barriers for Linux users and does not reflect cross-platform parity.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Bash/shell script examples for all PowerShell automation steps, especially for interacting with Palo Alto REST APIs and processing CSV files.
  • Explicitly mention that PowerShell examples are cross-platform only if tested on Linux/macOS, or clarify any Windows-specific requirements.
  • For Azure CLI commands, provide both PowerShell (with backticks for line continuation) and Bash (with backslashes) variants.
  • Add a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, outlining any differences or prerequisites (e.g., installing PowerShell Core, using curl/jq instead of Invoke-RestMethod, etc.).
  • Where possible, use platform-agnostic tools (e.g., curl, jq, Python scripts) for REST API interactions and CSV processing.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation presents configuration steps and CLI examples only in the context of the Azure portal and Azure CLI, without specifying or demonstrating any OS-specific commands. However, there is an implicit Windows bias: the Azure CLI installation and usage instructions do not mention Linux or macOS environments, nor do they provide any shell-specific guidance (e.g., Bash vs. PowerShell). There are no Linux-specific examples, troubleshooting tips, or references to Linux tools or shell environments, which may leave Linux users without clear guidance.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands are cross-platform and provide links or instructions for installing and using Azure CLI on Linux and macOS.
  • Include example commands using both Bash (for Linux/macOS) and PowerShell (for Windows), or clarify that the given commands work in all supported shells.
  • Add troubleshooting tips or notes for common issues on Linux (e.g., permissions, environment variables, dependency installation).
  • Where UI navigation is described, clarify that the Azure portal is web-based and OS-agnostic.
  • Consider adding a section or callout for Linux/macOS users to ensure parity and inclusivity.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias by specifying Windows as the OS type when creating the Function app, omitting Linux alternatives. It also lacks explicit Linux examples or guidance for deploying Function apps on Linux, and the only OS-specific flag shown is '--os-type windows'. No PowerShell-specific commands are present, but the pattern of mentioning Windows first and not providing Linux parity is evident.
Recommendations:
  • Provide examples for both Windows and Linux when creating the Function app, e.g., show '--os-type Linux' usage.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure Functions supports both Windows and Linux, and discuss any differences or considerations.
  • Include a note or section on how to adapt the steps for Linux users, especially for the Function app creation and deployment.
  • Ensure that all CLI commands and instructions are OS-agnostic or provide alternatives where behavior differs.
  • Review screenshots and portal instructions to ensure they are not Windows-specific and clarify any OS-dependent UI differences.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation does not display explicit Windows bias (such as PowerShell or Windows-only tools), but it also does not provide any OS-specific examples or instructions. All command-line examples use Azure CLI and bash-style commands, which are cross-platform but may be more familiar to Linux/macOS users. There are no references to Windows-specific tools, PowerShell, or Windows-first patterns. However, there is a lack of explicit Linux parity guidance or troubleshooting for Linux environments, and no mention of OS-specific considerations.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state that the Azure CLI and bash commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows (with WSL or Azure CLI for Windows).
  • If there are any OS-specific considerations (such as file path formats, environment variable syntax, or CLI installation steps), provide guidance for both Windows and Linux users.
  • Add a note or section on how to run the Azure CLI commands in PowerShell or Command Prompt for Windows users, if relevant.
  • Include troubleshooting tips for common issues that may differ between Linux and Windows environments (e.g., file permissions, line endings, etc.).
  • Ensure that any screenshots or UI references are not Windows-centric and clarify if the experience differs on other platforms.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First
Summary:
The documentation is largely cross-platform, using Azure CLI and OpenSSL for most examples, which are platform-agnostic or Linux-friendly. However, there is a subtle Windows bias in the 'Export certificate to PFX' section, where Windows tools (IIS, Certreq.exe) are mentioned as alternatives to OpenSSL, and the export process for Windows is referenced with a link to a Windows Server-specific guide. The Windows tools are mentioned after OpenSSL, but no explicit Linux-only tools or workflows are described. There are no PowerShell-specific examples, but the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows certificate management tools for users who did not use OpenSSL.
Recommendations:
  • Provide explicit Linux workflows for certificate export, such as using OpenSSL or other Linux-native tools, and clarify that OpenSSL commands work on both Linux and Windows.
  • When referencing Windows-specific tools (IIS, Certreq.exe), provide equivalent Linux guidance or links for users who generated certificates on Linux systems.
  • Consider adding a note or section that highlights cross-platform compatibility, and explicitly mention that all Azure CLI and OpenSSL commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • If mentioning Windows tools, ensure Linux alternatives are mentioned with equal prominence and detail.

Page-Level Analysis

Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a strong bias toward Windows and PowerShell environments. All automation and scripting examples are provided exclusively in PowerShell, with no equivalent Bash, shell, or Python examples for Linux users. The instructions assume the use of PowerShell and reference running Azure CLI commands in a PowerShell window, which may not be the default or preferred environment for Linux users. There is no mention of Linux-native tools or workflows, and the documentation does not address how to perform these tasks on Linux systems.
Recommendations:
  • Provide equivalent Bash or shell script examples for all PowerShell automation tasks, including REST API calls, CSV processing, and file manipulation.
  • Show how to use common Linux tools (e.g., curl, jq, awk, sed) to interact with the Palo Alto REST API and process CSV files.
  • When referencing Azure CLI, clarify that it can be run in Bash or other shells, not just in PowerShell, and provide syntax examples for both environments.
  • Explicitly mention any platform-specific requirements or differences, such as line endings in CSV files or authentication methods.
  • Consider including a section or callout for Linux/macOS users, outlining any prerequisites or adjustments needed to follow the guide.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows/Azure-centric bias by exclusively using Azure CLI commands, Azure portal screenshots, and Azure Fileshare workflows for all operational steps. There are no examples or instructions for Linux-native tools or workflows (e.g., SCP, rsync, Linux shell commands for file upload, or mounting storage). The documentation assumes the user is operating within the Azure ecosystem, which is more commonly associated with Windows environments, and does not provide parity for Linux users or those using non-Azure-native tooling.
Recommendations:
  • Provide alternative examples for uploading the Elastic APM Java Agent using Linux-native tools (e.g., SCP, rsync, Azure CLI from a Linux shell, or azcopy).
  • Include command-line examples that work on both Windows and Linux, or explicitly show Linux shell equivalents where appropriate.
  • Mention and demonstrate how to mount Azure Fileshares on Linux systems, not just via the Azure portal.
  • Balance screenshots and workflow descriptions by including Linux desktop or terminal-based workflows, not only Azure portal UI.
  • Clarify that the Azure CLI commands are cross-platform, and provide any necessary setup or troubleshooting tips for Linux users.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a subtle Windows bias by linking to the Windows section of the IntelliJ IDEA download page in the prerequisites, and by using backslashes (\) in folder paths (e.g., gs-spring-boot\complete), which is the Windows convention. There are no explicit Linux or macOS instructions, nor are there alternative path notations or download links for other platforms. However, the tutorial itself is largely platform-agnostic beyond these points.
Recommendations:
  • Update the IntelliJ IDEA download link to point to the general download page or provide links for Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Use platform-neutral path separators (e.g., gs-spring-boot/complete) or provide both Windows (\) and Unix-style (/) path examples.
  • Add a note clarifying that the instructions apply to all supported operating systems, and mention any OS-specific differences if relevant.
  • If screenshots differ significantly across platforms, consider providing representative images for each major OS.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation consistently uses Windows-style path separators (e.g., target\hellospring-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar) in CLI commands and does not provide Linux/macOS equivalents. There are no explicit Linux or macOS instructions or examples, and the only file paths shown are Windows-specific. This may cause confusion or errors for users on non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Provide both Windows and Linux/macOS command examples, especially for file paths (e.g., use both target\hellospring-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar and target/hellospring-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar).
  • Add a note clarifying that path separators differ between Windows (\) and Linux/macOS (/), and users should adjust accordingly.
  • Where possible, use environment-agnostic commands or variables, or show cross-platform alternatives using tabbed code blocks.
  • Explicitly mention that all CLI commands work on Linux/macOS as well as Windows, and reference any platform-specific prerequisites if needed.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively describes how to delete resources using the Azure Portal, a graphical interface commonly associated with Windows environments. There are no examples or instructions for performing the same task using command-line tools (such as Azure CLI or Azure PowerShell), which are frequently used in Linux or cross-platform environments.
Recommendations:
  • Add instructions for deleting the resource group using Azure CLI (az group delete), which is cross-platform and widely used in Linux environments.
  • If relevant, include Azure PowerShell examples, but ensure they are presented alongside CLI examples and not as the sole command-line option.
  • Clearly indicate that the Azure Portal is accessible from any OS, but supplement with command-line instructions for users who prefer or require non-GUI workflows.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references Service Bus Explorer, a tool that is only available for Windows, without mentioning or providing alternatives for Linux users. There are no examples or instructions for performing the same tasks on Linux, such as using cross-platform CLI tools or SDKs.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions for sending and peeking messages using Azure CLI or Azure PowerShell, both of which are cross-platform.
  • Mention and provide examples for using the Azure portal, which is accessible from any OS.
  • Reference SDK-based approaches (e.g., using Python, Java, or Node.js) for interacting with Service Bus queues, with code samples.
  • Explicitly state the platform limitations of Service Bus Explorer and suggest alternatives for Linux/macOS users.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation instructs users to delete resources via the Azure portal, which is a graphical tool commonly associated with Windows environments. There are no command-line examples provided for Linux users (such as using Azure CLI or Bash scripts), nor is there mention of alternative methods suitable for non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Add command-line instructions using Azure CLI (az group delete ...) that work cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS).
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal is web-based and accessible from any OS, to avoid the impression of Windows exclusivity.
  • Provide both GUI and CLI examples side by side to ensure parity for users on all platforms.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation shows some evidence of Windows bias, particularly in the C#/.NET section. For example, when retrieving the app endpoint, the Windows command (using --output table) is presented before the Linux command (using grep). The build and packaging instructions (dotnet publish, MSBuild .zip target) are Windows-centric and do not mention cross-platform compatibility or alternative Linux tools. There is no explicit PowerShell usage, but the overall pattern assumes a Windows development environment for .NET users. In contrast, the Java section uses cross-platform tools (Maven, Azure CLI, IntelliJ) and bash commands, which are platform-neutral.
Recommendations:
  • When presenting command-line instructions, always provide both Windows and Linux/macOS equivalents, or use cross-platform commands where possible.
  • If using Windows-specific tools or patterns (such as MSBuild .zip targets), note their compatibility on Linux/macOS or provide alternative instructions for those platforms.
  • Avoid labeling commands as 'Windows' or 'Linux' unless there is a genuine difference; otherwise, present the most cross-platform option first.
  • Explicitly mention that .NET Core and Azure CLI are cross-platform, and clarify any steps that may differ on Linux/macOS (e.g., file paths, shell syntax).
  • Consider including a short section or note on developing and deploying from Linux/macOS for .NET users, especially for build and packaging steps.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides both Azure CLI and PowerShell examples for resource cleanup, but PowerShell is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, which may not be as relevant for Linux/macOS users. There are no explicit Linux/macOS-specific instructions or terminal examples, and the PowerShell example is presented as a primary alternative to Azure CLI, rather than, for example, Bash or shell scripting. There are no references to Windows-only tools, but the lack of explicit Linux parity (e.g., Bash examples, mention of running CLI commands in Linux/macOS terminals) suggests a subtle Windows/PowerShell bias.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands can be run on Windows, Linux, and macOS, and provide guidance for installing Azure CLI on different platforms.
  • Consider providing Bash or shell script examples for Linux/macOS users, especially for resource cleanup and automation.
  • If PowerShell is included, clarify that it is available cross-platform, but also provide native Bash alternatives where appropriate.
  • Add a note or section highlighting cross-platform compatibility and any platform-specific considerations.
  • Ensure that any screenshots or UI references do not assume a Windows environment.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation exhibits a Windows bias in several ways: the Function App is created with --os-type windows by default, with no mention of Linux alternatives; there are no examples or guidance for deploying on Linux; and the use of Windows-specific terminology and defaults is present throughout. Additionally, the Azure Functions Core Tools and Azure CLI are cross-platform, but the explicit use of Windows as the default OS for the Function App and the absence of Linux parity in commands or notes is notable.
Recommendations:
  • Provide parallel examples for creating Function Apps with --os-type Linux, or at least mention Linux as an option.
  • Add notes or sections describing any differences or considerations for Linux users, especially for Function App deployment.
  • When presenting commands that specify an OS type, either default to Linux (as it is the default for Azure Functions) or show both Windows and Linux variants.
  • Ensure that any screenshots or portal instructions are not Windows-centric and clarify that the steps apply equally to Linux-based Function Apps.
  • Explicitly state that the Azure CLI and Functions Core Tools are cross-platform and provide any necessary troubleshooting or setup notes for Linux environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Azure PowerShell cmdlets alongside the Azure CLI for metric retrieval, without mentioning Linux-specific tools or providing Linux shell examples. The order of mention (CLI, then PowerShell) and the absence of Linux command-line or scripting examples further reinforce this bias. There are no examples or references to Linux-native tools, and all instructions are oriented around the Azure portal or Windows-centric tooling.
Recommendations:
  • Include explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for querying logs and metrics using the Azure CLI.
  • Mention and provide examples for Linux-native tools (such as curl, jq, or shell scripting) where appropriate.
  • When referencing command-line tools, present Azure CLI examples first, and clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform.
  • If PowerShell is mentioned, clarify that PowerShell Core is available cross-platform, or provide equivalent bash examples.
  • Add a section or note addressing cross-platform usage, ensuring parity for Linux and macOS users.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows/Azure portal bias by exclusively referencing the Azure portal GUI for configuration steps, with no mention of command-line alternatives (such as Azure CLI, PowerShell, or Bash scripts) that would be relevant for Linux users. All instructions assume use of the graphical Azure portal, which is more commonly used on Windows, and there are no examples or guidance for performing these tasks from a Linux environment or via cross-platform tools.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions using Azure CLI commands for all configuration steps (e.g., app registration, client secret creation, redirect URI management), as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
  • Provide sample scripts or command-line snippets for Linux users to automate or perform the same tasks without relying on the Azure portal GUI.
  • Explicitly mention that all steps can be performed via the Azure CLI or REST API, and link to relevant documentation.
  • Where screenshots are provided, consider including CLI output or terminal screenshots to illustrate parity.
  • Review the documentation to ensure that Linux users are not required to use Windows-specific tools or interfaces, and that all steps are accessible from any OS.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows-first bias by exclusively providing instructions and examples using the Azure portal (web UI) and Azure CLI, without mentioning or providing examples for Linux-specific environments, shell differences, or alternative tools. There is no explicit mention of PowerShell, but the lack of Linux/macOS-specific notes or examples (such as bash-specific syntax, environment variable handling, or troubleshooting) may hinder Linux users. The Azure CLI is cross-platform, but the documentation does not clarify this or address potential differences in usage between Windows and Linux.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state that the Azure CLI commands work on Windows, Linux, and macOS, and provide any necessary notes about differences (e.g., line continuation characters, quoting).
  • Include example commands using bash/zsh syntax where relevant, especially if there are differences in environment variable usage or command formatting.
  • Add troubleshooting tips or notes for Linux/macOS users, such as permissions, path issues, or package manager installation steps for Azure CLI.
  • If referencing the Azure portal, clarify that it is web-based and platform-independent.
  • Consider adding a section or callout for Linux/macOS users to ensure parity and inclusivity.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides instructions exclusively for deleting resources via the Azure Portal, which is a graphical interface commonly associated with Windows workflows. There are no command-line examples (such as Azure CLI or PowerShell), and no Linux-specific instructions or parity with non-Windows environments.
Recommendations:
  • Add Azure CLI examples for deleting a resource group, which work cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS).
  • If mentioning PowerShell, also provide Bash equivalents.
  • Explicitly state that the Azure Portal is platform-agnostic, but supplement with command-line instructions for users who prefer or require terminal-based workflows.
  • Include a section or note for Linux/macOS users to ensure parity and inclusivity.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides only Azure CLI and bash-style shell command examples, which are cross-platform but assumes a Unix-like (Linux/macOS) environment. There are no explicit Windows or PowerShell examples, nor any mention of Windows-specific tools or patterns. However, there is a lack of explicit guidance or examples for Windows users, especially those using PowerShell or Command Prompt, which may create friction for Windows-centric audiences.
Recommendations:
  • Add notes clarifying that the provided commands are intended for Unix-like shells (e.g., bash, zsh, WSL) and may not work as-is in Windows Command Prompt or PowerShell.
  • Where environment variables and command syntax differ (e.g., 'export' vs. '$env:'), provide equivalent PowerShell/Windows Command Prompt examples or a link to a section on running Azure CLI in Windows environments.
  • Explicitly mention that tools like jq may require additional installation steps on Windows, and provide installation instructions or alternatives for Windows users.
  • Consider including a short section or callout box for Windows users, explaining how to adapt the examples or recommending the use of Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) if appropriate.