Storage

688
Total Pages
395
Linux-Friendly Pages
293
Pages with Bias
42.6%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

1657 issues found
Showing 201-225 of 1657 flagged pages
Storage Configure Azure Files Network Endpoints ...es/storage/files/storage-files-networking-endpoints.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page shows a moderate Windows bias. Windows tools and patterns (PowerShell, Windows output) are consistently presented first or exclusively, with PowerShell examples and output shown before Azure CLI or Linux/macOS equivalents. Output samples are labeled as 'shown for Windows' and use Windows-specific formatting. There is a lack of explicit Linux/macOS command output examples, and troubleshooting/verification steps reference Windows tools and terminology more than Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/macOS-specific command output samples alongside Windows output, especially for verification steps.
  • Explicitly mention and show examples using common Linux tools (e.g., dig, host) in addition to nslookup.
  • Balance the order of examples so that Azure CLI (cross-platform) is presented before or alongside PowerShell.
  • Clarify when instructions or outputs differ between Windows and Linux/macOS, and provide both variants.
  • Add troubleshooting notes for Linux/macOS environments, including common issues and solutions.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Networking Considerations for Azure Files ...les/storage/files/storage-files-networking-overview.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates several forms of Windows bias. Windows tools and terminology (such as PowerShell and Windows Server) are mentioned first or exclusively in key sections, especially in DNS configuration and SMB over QUIC. Examples for DNS resolution use PowerShell cmdlets, with only a brief mention of nslookup as an alternative, and no explicit Linux command examples. The SMB over QUIC section is entirely Windows-centric, with no discussion of Linux or cross-platform alternatives. Azure File Sync and related caching solutions are described only for Windows environments. While some references to Linux exist (e.g., a link to configuring P2S VPN on Linux), practical examples and parity in tooling are lacking.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux command examples (e.g., dig, host, nslookup) alongside PowerShell in DNS configuration sections.
  • Discuss SMB client options and configuration for Linux, including mounting Azure Files via SMB and NFS, with step-by-step examples.
  • Clarify cross-platform support and limitations for features like SMB over QUIC, and mention any Linux equivalents or workarounds.
  • Include instructions for configuring Azure File Sync or similar caching mechanisms for Linux clients, or state limitations clearly.
  • Ensure that examples and tooling references are presented in parallel for both Windows and Linux, rather than Windows-first or Windows-only.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Configure DNS forwarding for Azure Files ...articles/storage/files/storage-files-networking-dns.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All code examples use PowerShell and Windows DNS Server cmdlets, with no mention of Linux equivalents (such as BIND or dnsmasq) or cross-platform alternatives. The prerequisites specifically call out Azure PowerShell, and the instructions assume the use of Windows Server DNS. There are no examples or guidance for configuring DNS forwarding on Linux-based DNS servers, nor are Linux command-line tools (e.g., dig, systemd-resolved) referenced for testing DNS resolution.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent instructions and examples for configuring DNS forwarding using common Linux DNS servers (e.g., BIND, dnsmasq, Unbound).
  • Include Linux command-line examples for testing DNS resolution (e.g., dig, host, nslookup) alongside PowerShell commands.
  • Clarify prerequisites to include both Windows and Linux environments, and link to relevant setup guides for Linux DNS servers.
  • Explicitly state that the process applies to both Windows and Linux DNS servers, and provide links or references to official documentation for Linux DNS configuration.
  • Present examples for both platforms in parallel, or alternate the order to avoid Windows-first presentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Plan for an Azure Files deployment .../main/articles/storage/files/storage-files-planning.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas. Windows terminology, tools, and scenarios are consistently mentioned first or exclusively, such as recommending Windows Server for Azure File Sync, listing Windows OS versions before Linux, and referencing Windows-specific features (Active Directory, SMB over QUIC, Win32 semantics). Examples and instructions for Linux are minimal or absent, and PowerShell/Windows CLI tools are referenced more than Linux equivalents.
Recommendations
  • Provide equal and parallel examples for Linux, including mounting, authentication, and management workflows.
  • Mention Linux tools (e.g., mount.cifs, mount.nfs, Samba, Kerberos configuration on Linux) alongside Windows tools and PowerShell.
  • List supported operating systems in a neutral order or alternate which is listed first.
  • Include Linux-specific guidance for Azure File Sync alternatives, migration, and backup/restore scenarios.
  • Reference Linux documentation links as prominently as Windows links.
  • Clarify which features are Windows-only and suggest Linux alternatives or workarounds where possible.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Use Azure Files share snapshots ...main/articles/storage/files/storage-snapshots-files.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows-specific tools (Robocopy, File Explorer 'Previous Versions') are described in detail, with step-by-step instructions and screenshots. Windows scenarios (such as restoring to a local drive) are covered before Linux equivalents, and Windows features are referenced as the default or primary method. While Linux mounting and restore instructions are present, they are less detailed, lack screenshots, and are introduced after Windows examples. There are no Linux-native restore examples for SMB shares (other than mounting), and no mention of Linux tools analogous to Robocopy.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux-native examples for restoring files from SMB share snapshots, including common tools (e.g., cp, rsync, smbclient) and step-by-step instructions.
  • Add screenshots and detailed walkthroughs for Linux scenarios, matching the depth of Windows coverage.
  • Mention Linux tools and patterns (e.g., accessing previous versions via mount, using file managers) alongside Windows tools, not after.
  • Clarify parity and limitations for both platforms in the 'Limits' and 'Capabilities' sections.
  • Avoid language that implies Windows is the default or primary platform; present Windows and Linux options side-by-side.
  • Include troubleshooting tips for Linux users, similar to those provided for Windows.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Use Azure Files for Virtual Desktop Workloads ...in/articles/storage/files/virtual-desktop-workloads.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation is heavily focused on Windows-based virtual desktop scenarios, with repeated references to FSLogix, roaming user profiles, folder redirection, and Windows-specific technologies. All examples and recommendations are tailored to Windows environments, and there is no mention of Linux session hosts, Linux authentication patterns, or Linux-compatible tooling. The guidance assumes Windows as the default platform for Azure Virtual Desktop and related workloads.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit guidance for Linux-based session hosts, including supported authentication and profile storage patterns.
  • Include examples and recommendations for mounting Azure Files from Linux VMs, such as using SMB/CIFS with Linux tools (e.g., mount.cifs).
  • Discuss limitations, scale, and performance considerations for Linux workloads using Azure Files.
  • Reference Linux equivalents for user profile management and application delivery, or clarify platform limitations.
  • Where Windows tools or patterns are mentioned, provide Linux alternatives or note if not supported.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Examples for Azure role assignment conditions for Queue Storage ...n/articles/storage/queues/queues-auth-abac-examples.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides detailed examples for Azure Queue Storage role assignment conditions, but all CLI-based instructions and code samples are exclusively for Azure PowerShell. There are no examples using cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI, Bash, or Linux shell scripting. The repeated use of PowerShell and the absence of Linux or macOS command-line equivalents indicate a Windows-centric bias.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent examples using Azure CLI (az) commands, which are cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Include Bash or shell script samples for condition assignment and testing, especially for scenarios where scripting is demonstrated.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure PowerShell is available on Linux and macOS, but provide alternatives for users who prefer native Linux tools.
  • Consider reordering examples so that cross-platform tools (Azure CLI) are presented before or alongside PowerShell to avoid implicit prioritization of Windows tooling.
  • Add a section or note on how to perform these tasks on Linux/macOS environments, including any prerequisites or differences.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Best practices for monitoring Azure Queue Storage .../storage/queues/queues-storage-monitoring-scenarios.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias by providing PowerShell as the first example for monitoring queue message counts, and does not include any Linux shell (bash) or cross-platform scripting examples. The use of PowerShell and .NET/C# SDK examples may be more familiar to Windows users, while Linux-native tools or SDKs (such as Python or bash/CLI) are not highlighted or demonstrated. There are no explicit references to Windows-only tools, but the ordering and example selection favor Windows environments.
Recommendations
  • Provide bash or shell script examples for common monitoring tasks, especially for Azure CLI usage, to ensure Linux users have clear guidance.
  • Include code samples using cross-platform SDKs, such as Python or JavaScript, alongside .NET/C#.
  • Alternate the order of examples (e.g., show Azure CLI or bash first, then PowerShell) or present them side-by-side to avoid implicit prioritization.
  • Explicitly mention that all Azure CLI commands are cross-platform and can be run on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Where PowerShell is used, consider also showing equivalent bash or shell commands for parity.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Zonal Placement for Azure File Shares ...cs/blob/main/articles/storage/files/zonal-placement.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing command-line examples exclusively using Azure PowerShell, a Windows-centric tool. There are no equivalent examples for Linux users (e.g., Azure CLI, Bash), and PowerShell is presented as the only scripting option. The structure consistently lists the Azure portal (GUI) and PowerShell, with no mention of Linux-native tools or workflows, making it less accessible for users on Linux or macOS platforms.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI (az) command examples for all PowerShell steps, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI can be used on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide links to installation instructions.
  • Consider including Bash script examples or references for automation on Linux systems.
  • Reorder or parallelize examples so that PowerShell and Azure CLI are presented together, or allow users to select their preferred environment via tabs.
  • Review terminology to avoid implying PowerShell is the default or only option for scripting with Azure.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Authorize access to queues using Active Directory ...rage/queues/authorize-access-azure-active-directory.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently mentioning PowerShell before Azure CLI, using 'PowerShell or Azure CLI' phrasing, and lacking explicit Linux-specific examples or instructions. There are no references to Linux-native tools, shell environments, or command syntax, and the guidance does not address platform differences in authentication or usage. This may make the documentation less accessible or immediately useful for Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Alternate the order of mentioning Azure CLI and PowerShell, or use 'Azure CLI or PowerShell' phrasing to avoid Windows-first bias.
  • Provide explicit Linux shell (bash/zsh) examples for authentication and queue access, including command syntax and environment setup.
  • Include notes or sections addressing platform-specific considerations, such as differences in credential storage, environment variables, or installation steps for Azure CLI on Linux.
  • Mention Linux-native tools (e.g., curl, wget, jq) where appropriate for interacting with Azure Storage REST APIs.
  • Ensure screenshots, code snippets, and walkthroughs are available for both Windows and Linux environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Performance and scalability checklist for Queue Storage ...ticles/storage/queues/storage-performance-checklist.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. It references Windows-specific tools (Network Monitor), omits Linux equivalents or examples in tooling and diagnostics, and mentions PowerShell and Azure CLI together but does not provide parity in examples or guidance for Linux users. The .NET configuration section is Windows-centric, focusing on .NET Framework and ServicePointManager, with only a brief mention that other languages may have similar concepts but without concrete Linux or cross-platform examples.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux tool references and examples (e.g., suggest tcpdump alongside Wireshark for network diagnostics).
  • Provide sample commands and usage for Azure CLI and other cross-platform tools, not just mention them.
  • Include configuration and performance tuning examples for popular Linux environments and languages (e.g., Python, Java) in addition to .NET.
  • When listing tools, avoid listing Windows tools first or exclusively; ensure Linux and cross-platform options are presented equally.
  • Clarify which recommendations are platform-agnostic and which are Windows-specific, and provide alternatives where needed.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Quickstart: Azure Queue Storage client library - .NET ...les/storage/queues/storage-quickstart-queues-dotnet.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias. In the 'Create the project' section, Windows-specific consoles (cmd, PowerShell) are mentioned before Bash, and there is no explicit mention of Linux or macOS environments elsewhere. The instructions and examples assume familiarity with Windows tooling and patterns, such as referencing Visual Studio and PowerShell, while not providing parity for Linux-specific editors or shell environments. There are no Linux-specific troubleshooting notes, nor are Linux or macOS explicitly referenced in the 'Run the code' or environment variable setup sections.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention Linux and macOS as supported platforms in the prerequisites and setup sections.
  • List Bash or terminal before or alongside cmd/PowerShell when referencing console windows.
  • Provide Linux/macOS-specific notes for environment variable setup (e.g., export in Bash, .bashrc/.zshrc usage).
  • Reference cross-platform editors (e.g., VS Code, JetBrains Rider) alongside Visual Studio.
  • Add troubleshooting notes for common Linux/macOS issues (e.g., permissions, SDK installation paths).
  • Ensure all instructions (such as setting environment variables) include both Windows and Linux/macOS commands.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Deploy Tiger Bridge Continuous Data Protection, Archive and Disaster Recovery with Azure Blob Storage ...up-archive-disaster-recovery/tiger-bridge-cdp-guide.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias: all deployment and configuration steps assume a Windows file server, with no mention of Linux support or equivalents. Windows tools (Windows Explorer, Volume Shadow Copy Service, DFSR) are referenced exclusively, and all UI and workflow examples are Windows-centric. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or tool references, and the documentation does not address cross-platform scenarios.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit information about Tiger Bridge support for Linux servers, if available, or clarify platform limitations.
  • Provide Linux-specific deployment and configuration steps, including CLI or GUI instructions relevant to Linux environments.
  • Include examples using Linux file management tools (e.g., Nautilus, CLI commands) for backup, restore, and archive operations.
  • Reference Linux equivalents for Windows features (e.g., snapshotting, file versioning, undelete functionality) and how Tiger Bridge integrates with them.
  • If Tiger Bridge is Windows-only, state this clearly at the beginning of the documentation to set expectations for non-Windows users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Migrate your file data to Azure with Datadobi DobiMigrate ...tners/data-management/dobimigrate-quick-start-guide.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Windows-centric tools (e.g., Azure portal, commercial network monitoring tools popular on Windows), and omitting Linux-specific guidance or examples. All configuration and operational steps are shown via the Azure portal GUI, with no mention of CLI or automation options (such as Azure CLI, PowerShell, or Bash). There are no examples or instructions for Linux environments, such as using SMB mounts, CLI-based configuration, or open-source network monitoring tools. The order and selection of tools and instructions assume a Windows-first audience.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific examples for configuring Azure Files, such as mounting SMB shares from Linux clients using mount.cifs.
  • Include instructions for using Azure CLI and Bash scripts for storage account and file share management, alongside portal-based steps.
  • Mention open-source and Linux-friendly network monitoring tools (e.g., iftop, nload, vnStat, Netdata) when discussing bandwidth assessment.
  • Provide parity in troubleshooting and support guidance for Linux environments, including relevant logs and commands.
  • Ensure that examples and screenshots alternate between Windows and Linux environments, or provide both where appropriate.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Analyze and migrate your file data to Azure with Data Dynamics StorageX ...partners/data-management/storagex-quick-start-guide.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric concepts, tools, and workflows. Active Directory integration and SMB/Windows file server scenarios are described in detail, while NFS/Linux equivalents are mentioned only briefly or as secondary options. Windows-specific tools (e.g., portqryui), file paths (C:\ProgramData), and installation instructions (right-click, Run as administrator) are used exclusively, with no Linux command-line or automation examples. There is a lack of parity in guidance for Linux/NFS environments, and no mention of Linux-native tools or deployment patterns.
Recommendations
  • Provide step-by-step instructions for deploying StorageX on Linux-based servers, including NFS migration scenarios.
  • Include Linux-specific examples for service account creation, permissions, and network port verification (e.g., using netstat, ss, or nmap).
  • Offer alternative installation instructions for Linux environments, such as shell commands and relevant file paths.
  • List Linux-native tools for network bandwidth measurement (e.g., iftop, iperf, vnstat) alongside Windows tools.
  • Ensure that NFS/Linux migration workflows are described with equal detail and clarity as SMB/Windows workflows.
  • Avoid using Windows-centric terminology (e.g., 'Run as administrator', C:\ paths) without Linux equivalents.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Considerations for running ISV file services in Azure ...artners/primary-secondary-storage/isv-file-services.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Several ISV solutions (Tiger Technology, XenData) are described as operating specifically on Windows Server or with NTFS file systems, and features such as 'Windows Shell integration' and 'Disaster Recovery for Windows servers' are highlighted. The operating environment comparison lists 'Windows Server' for some solutions, but does not mention Linux equivalents or support for Linux-based environments where applicable. There are no explicit Linux or POSIX examples, and Linux management or deployment patterns (e.g., systemd, Linux CLI, shell scripts) are not referenced. Additionally, Windows-centric features are mentioned before any Linux alternatives, and some features (e.g., failover via Windows cluster) are described only in the Windows context.
Recommendations
  • Explicitly mention Linux support or operating environments for each ISV solution where applicable, including supported distributions and file systems (e.g., ext4, XFS).
  • Provide parity in feature descriptions, such as Linux shell integration, Linux disaster recovery, and management via Linux-native tools.
  • Include Linux-specific examples or use cases (e.g., disaster recovery for Linux servers, Linux VDI, Linux container workloads).
  • Clarify whether features like failover, clustering, and management are available and supported on Linux, and describe how they are implemented (e.g., Pacemaker, Corosync, systemd services).
  • Add references to Linux deployment guides, CLI management, and automation tools (e.g., Ansible, Terraform for Linux).
  • Ensure protocol and authentication support tables include Linux-relevant details (e.g., Kerberos, PAM, integration with Linux LDAP).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Deploy hybrid data infrastructure with Tiger Bridge and Azure Blob Storage ...ary-secondary-storage/tiger-bridge-deployment-guide.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation is heavily oriented towards Windows environments, with Tiger Bridge described as fully integrated with NTFS/ReFS and requiring a Windows file server for deployment. All configuration and deployment steps reference Windows-specific tools, file systems, and GUI elements (such as Windows Explorer shell extension), with no Linux or cross-platform CLI examples provided. Linux/NAS support is mentioned only briefly and generically, without any practical guidance or examples. The documentation also references Microsoft DFS/DFS-R and other Windows-centric disaster recovery solutions, further reinforcing the Windows bias.
Recommendations
  • Include explicit Linux deployment instructions, such as how to install and configure Tiger Bridge on Linux servers or NAS devices using NFS/SMB.
  • Provide CLI-based examples for Linux environments (e.g., bash commands, systemd integration), not just GUI or Windows Explorer workflows.
  • List Linux file systems (e.g., ext4, XFS, ZFS) and describe Tiger Bridge compatibility or limitations.
  • Offer parity in troubleshooting and support sections for Linux users, including how to open cases from Linux environments.
  • Add screenshots and step-by-step guides for Linux/NAS configuration and pairing with Azure Blob Storage.
  • Mention Linux equivalents for any Windows-specific tools or patterns (e.g., alternatives to DFS/DFS-R, shell extensions, etc.).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Nasuni configuration guide for Microsoft Azure ...s/primary-secondary-storage/nasuni-deployment-guide.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation consistently uses Windows terminology and patterns, such as 'Windows Azure Platform', and all screenshots and step-by-step instructions are based on the Azure portal GUI, which is most commonly used on Windows. There are no CLI, PowerShell, or Linux shell examples, nor is there any mention of Linux-specific tools or workflows. The documentation refers to 'Windows file server workloads' and 'Windows Azure Platform' as defaults, with no parity for Linux or cross-platform usage. This creates a bias toward Windows users and administrators, making it less accessible for those who prefer or require Linux-based automation or management.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent instructions for creating and managing Azure storage accounts using Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell, with explicit Linux shell examples.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output from Linux environments where relevant.
  • Replace 'Windows Azure Platform' with 'Microsoft Azure' or 'Azure' to avoid Windows-centric terminology.
  • Provide examples of configuring Nasuni and Azure Blob Storage from Linux systems, including credential management and firewall configuration.
  • Mention Linux SMB/NFS clients and their compatibility with Nasuni/Azure Blob Storage.
  • Ensure that any automation steps (e.g., scripting credential rotation) include both PowerShell and Bash examples.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Get started with Storage Explorer ...ttps://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/storage/storage-explorer/vs-azure-tools-storage-manage-with-storage-explorer.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page generally covers all major platforms (Windows, macOS, Linux) and provides installation instructions for each. However, there is evidence of Windows bias: Windows is listed first in prerequisites, and the legacy Azure Storage Emulator is mentioned as a supported emulator (Windows only) before Azurite, which is cross-platform. There are no Linux-specific troubleshooting examples or screenshots, and some instructions (such as .NET runtime management) are more detailed for Windows than for Linux. The SLES section is less supported/tested, and overall, Linux instructions are less detailed and lack parity in examples and troubleshooting.
Recommendations
  • Rotate the order of platform sections or list Linux/macOS first in some places to avoid implicit prioritization of Windows.
  • Provide Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and examples, including screenshots of Storage Explorer running on Linux.
  • Expand instructions for .NET runtime management and dependency installation for Linux, matching the detail given for Windows.
  • Add parity in emulator documentation: emphasize Azurite as the recommended emulator for all platforms, and provide Linux/macOS installation and usage examples.
  • Improve support and documentation for SLES and other Linux distributions, or clarify limitations more transparently.
  • Where possible, use platform-neutral language and examples, and avoid referencing Windows-only tools (like the legacy Azure Storage Emulator) before cross-platform alternatives.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Performance and scalability checklist for Table storage ...ticles/storage/tables/storage-performance-checklist.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-11 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a mild Windows bias. It references Windows-specific tools (WireShark, NetMon), and .NET Framework configuration (ServicePointManager, ThreadPool) without providing equivalent Linux or cross-platform alternatives. PowerShell and Azure CLI are mentioned together, but no Linux shell examples (e.g., Bash) are given. The order of presentation and examples tends to favor Windows/.NET environments, with Linux-specific guidance or parity missing.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific tools for network diagnostics (e.g., tcpdump, iftop, nload) alongside WireShark and NetMon.
  • Provide configuration examples for popular Linux programming environments (e.g., Python, Java) where .NET settings are discussed.
  • Add Bash/Azure CLI command examples for common operations, not just PowerShell.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform client libraries and provide usage notes for Linux/macOS environments.
  • Where Windows-specific advice is given, add equivalent Linux/macOS recommendations or clarify platform applicability.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Best practices for monitoring Azure Blob Storage ...les/storage/blobs/blob-storage-monitoring-scenarios.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Windows First
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates mild Windows bias. PowerShell is used as the primary example for decoding SAS tokens, with Linux alternatives mentioned only after the Windows/PowerShell method. The use of PowerShell and references to Windows-centric tools appear before Linux equivalents, and the documentation does not provide parity in example depth or clarity for Linux users. No explicit Linux command-line examples (e.g., bash, shell scripts) are given for other tasks, and Windows/PowerShell is presented as the default pattern.
Recommendations
  • Provide Linux/bash examples alongside PowerShell for all command-line tasks, especially for decoding and hashing SAS tokens.
  • Present Linux and Windows methods with equal prominence and clarity, ideally side-by-side.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, Python scripts) and provide usage examples for both Windows and Linux.
  • Avoid assuming PowerShell as the default; clarify that multiple platforms are supported and provide links to platform-specific guidance.
  • Where screenshots or UI instructions are given, note any platform-specific differences or provide alternatives for Linux users.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Example Azure role assignment conditions for Blob Storage ...n/articles/storage/blobs/storage-auth-abac-examples.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page provides extensive Azure PowerShell examples for every scenario, but does not offer equivalent examples for Linux or cross-platform command-line tools such as Azure CLI, Bash, or REST API. All scripting and automation guidance is focused on PowerShell, which is primarily a Windows tool, and there are no references to Linux-native workflows or tools. This creates a strong Windows bias, making it harder for Linux users to follow or automate these procedures.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent Azure CLI examples for each scenario, showing how to perform the same role assignment condition tasks using az commands.
  • Include Bash script samples for testing and automation, especially for blob operations (e.g., using az storage blob commands).
  • Reference REST API calls for advanced users who may want to automate via curl or other Linux-native tools.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility and provide guidance for both Windows and Linux users.
  • Where PowerShell is used, clarify that Azure PowerShell is available on Linux, but also provide alternatives for users who prefer native Linux tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Quickstart: Azure Blob Storage library - C++ ...articles/storage/blobs/quickstart-blobs-c-plus-plus.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Visual Studio Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-specific tools and workflows. Project creation is described exclusively in Visual Studio for Windows, with screenshots and instructions tailored to that environment. The initial package installation command uses the Windows-style 'vcpkg.exe', and the project setup assumes a Visual Studio solution file. Linux instructions are only provided for setting environment variables, and there is no guidance for creating or building projects on Linux (e.g., using CMake or other editors). There are no Linux-specific code or workflow examples, and the documentation does not mention cross-platform development practices.
Recommendations
  • Add a parallel section for Linux users, detailing project creation and build steps using CMake or other cross-platform tools.
  • Provide screenshots and instructions for popular Linux IDEs (e.g., VS Code, CLion) or command-line workflows.
  • Use platform-neutral commands for package installation (e.g., 'vcpkg install ...') and clarify differences between Windows and Linux usage.
  • Include Linux-specific instructions for opening, building, and running the sample code.
  • Ensure all environment variable setup instructions are given equal prominence for both Windows and Linux.
  • Avoid assuming Visual Studio as the default development environment; mention alternatives for non-Windows platforms.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Run an Azure Function in response to a blob rehydration event ...ticles/storage/blobs/archive-rehydrate-handle-event.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias throughout. It exclusively uses Visual Studio (Windows-only) for development and deployment steps, specifies Windows as the required operating system for the Function App, and provides only PowerShell commands for package installation. There are no examples or instructions for Linux or cross-platform development environments such as VS Code, Azure CLI, or Bash. Windows tools and workflows are mentioned first and exclusively, with no Linux equivalents or alternatives provided.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions for developing and deploying Azure Functions using VS Code or other cross-platform editors.
  • Include steps for creating and publishing Function Apps on Linux or using the 'Linux' OS option in Azure.
  • Provide package installation examples using dotnet CLI and Bash, not just PowerShell.
  • Mention and demonstrate the use of Azure CLI for resource creation and management, alongside portal instructions.
  • Clarify that Azure Functions can run on both Windows and Linux, and provide guidance for both.
  • Ensure screenshots and walkthroughs include Linux options where applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Storage Authorize access to blobs using Microsoft Entra ID ...orage/blobs/authorize-access-azure-active-directory.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-10 00:00
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by consistently mentioning PowerShell before Azure CLI, grouping them together as primary command-line interfaces, and failing to provide explicit Linux or cross-platform examples. There is a lack of references to Linux-specific tools, shell environments, or guidance for non-Windows users, and the examples and instructions do not address platform differences or parity.
Recommendations
  • Ensure that Azure CLI examples are presented before or alongside PowerShell, emphasizing its cross-platform nature.
  • Explicitly mention Linux and macOS environments when discussing command-line access, including any platform-specific considerations.
  • Provide sample commands and workflows for Linux shells (e.g., bash, zsh) and clarify any differences in authentication or usage compared to PowerShell.
  • Include references to Linux-native tools and scripting patterns where relevant.
  • Review and update language to avoid grouping PowerShell and Azure CLI as equivalent defaults; highlight Azure CLI as the recommended cross-platform tool.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 9 of 67 Next →