Scan Details - Linux-first Docs for Azure

756

Pages Scanned

236

Pages Flagged

756

Changed Pages

31.2%

% Pages Flagged

Scan Information

Started At: 2026-01-11 00:00:06

Finished At: 2026-01-11 18:19:07

Status: completed

Target Repo: Azure Management

Current Phase: discovery

Files Queued: 756

Files Completed: 756

Problematic Pages

236 issues found

Azure Arc Tutorial – Deploy Active Directory connector in system-managed keytab mode ...eploy-system-managed-keytab-active-directory-connector.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific tools (e.g., 'netdom query fsmo' to find the primary domain controller) without providing Linux or cross-platform alternatives. The only example for discovering domain controller roles is a Windows command, and there is no mention of how to perform equivalent tasks from Linux or other platforms. The documentation also assumes familiarity with Windows/Active Directory concepts and does not provide parity for Linux administrators.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Linux-based commands or procedures for discovering Active Directory domain controller roles, such as using 'ldapsearch' or 'samba-tool'.
When referencing Windows tools, also mention cross-platform or open-source alternatives where possible.
Add explicit examples or notes for Linux environments, especially for tasks like querying AD information, managing keytabs, and interacting with AD from non-Windows systems.
Clarify any platform-specific requirements or limitations, and ensure instructions are inclusive of both Windows and Linux administrators.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Deploy Active Directory integrated SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc using Azure CLI ...ta/deploy-active-directory-sql-managed-instance-cli.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by focusing exclusively on Active Directory integration, which is a Windows-centric technology. There are no references to Linux-native identity solutions (such as LDAP or Kerberos outside of AD), nor are there examples or guidance for Linux-based AD alternatives. The examples and terminology (keytab, AD account, DNS names in .local domains) are all oriented toward Windows/Active Directory scenarios, with no mention of Linux-specific patterns or tools. The prerequisites and instructions assume the use of Azure CLI, which is cross-platform, but the identity integration is solely Windows/AD-focused.

Recommendations

Include guidance or examples for integrating with Linux-native identity providers (such as OpenLDAP or FreeIPA), if supported.
Explicitly state platform requirements and limitations, clarifying that AD integration is Windows-centric and noting any Linux alternatives.
Provide parity in documentation by mentioning or linking to Linux-based identity integration scenarios, or clarify that such scenarios are not supported.
Add notes or sections for users deploying on Linux environments, including any required configuration differences or caveats.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Verify Contributor Role for Edge RAG Preview Enabled by Azure Arc ...s/azure-arc/edge-rag/prepare-contributor-permission.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides only PowerShell examples for verifying contributor permissions and running Azure CLI commands, which are typically associated with Windows environments. There are no examples or instructions for running these commands on Linux or macOS, nor is there mention of alternative shells or platforms. This may make it less accessible for users working on non-Windows systems.

Recommendations

Include explicit instructions or examples for running Azure CLI commands on Linux and macOS terminals (e.g., bash, zsh).
Clarify that the Azure CLI commands can be run on any platform, not just in PowerShell.
Provide command examples in both PowerShell and bash/zsh syntax, or use a neutral format that works across platforms.
Mention installation steps or prerequisites for Azure CLI on Linux/macOS if relevant.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Sample - Enable GPU for AKS on Azure Arc ...lob/main/articles/azure-arc/edge-rag/enable-gpu-aks.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page exclusively provides a PowerShell script using Windows-specific tools (e.g., Get-PnpDevice, pnputil, Restart-Service) for enabling GPU on AKS enabled by Azure Arc. There are no Linux or cross-platform examples, nor any mention of Linux equivalents or instructions. The guidance assumes a Windows environment and does not address how to perform these steps on Linux hosts.

Recommendations

Add equivalent Linux instructions and sample scripts (e.g., using lspci, lsmod, modprobe, systemctl, and relevant NVIDIA driver installation commands).
Clearly indicate platform requirements and provide guidance for both Windows and Linux hosts.
If certain steps are Windows-only, explain how Linux users should proceed or reference relevant Azure Arc/AKS GPU enablement documentation for Linux.
Consider providing a cross-platform script or workflow, or at least parallel sections for Windows and Linux environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Upload billing data to Azure and view it in the Azure portal .../articles/azure-arc/data/view-billing-data-in-azure.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by exclusively referencing Windows-centric tools and workflows, such as Excel for viewing CSV files and the Windows Downloads folder for file storage. There are no examples or instructions for Linux users, such as using Linux-native tools (e.g., LibreOffice, csvkit, or command-line utilities) to view or process billing data. The documentation assumes a Windows environment for file handling and does not mention Linux equivalents or provide cross-platform guidance.

Recommendations

Include instructions for opening CSV files using Linux tools such as LibreOffice Calc, csvkit, or spreadsheet viewers.
Mention that the Downloads folder location may differ on Linux and macOS, and provide guidance for those platforms.
Add examples of automating billing data upload and processing using Bash scripts or Linux command-line utilities.
Ensure that references to file editors and viewers are platform-neutral or provide alternatives for Linux and macOS.
Explicitly state that the Azure portal and storage account access are cross-platform and can be used from any OS.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Configure DNS for Edge RAG Preview Enabled by Azure Arc ...s/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/edge-rag/prepare-dns.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by exclusively providing instructions for editing the hosts file on Windows (using Notepad and referencing C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts), without mentioning or providing equivalent steps for Linux or macOS systems. Windows tools and patterns are referenced first and exclusively, with no cross-platform parity.

Recommendations

Add instructions for editing the hosts file on Linux (typically /etc/hosts) and macOS.
Include examples using common Linux text editors (e.g., nano, vim) and the required sudo privileges.
Clearly indicate that the process applies to multiple operating systems and provide OS-specific steps.
Avoid referencing Windows tools (like Notepad) exclusively; mention cross-platform alternatives.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Tutorial: Implement CI/CD with GitOps (Flux v2) ...es/azure-arc/kubernetes/tutorial-gitops-flux2-ci-cd.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows/Azure bias. The Azure DevOps workflow is presented first, in greater detail, and with more step-by-step instructions than the GitHub workflow. Azure-specific tools and patterns (Azure CLI, Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Azure Pipelines, Azure Container Registry) are referenced throughout, and the tutorial assumes familiarity with Azure DevOps concepts. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples, nor are alternative Linux-native CI/CD tools (e.g., Jenkins, GitLab CI, ArgoCD) mentioned. The use of Azure CLI commands is platform-neutral but implicitly assumes users are comfortable with the Azure ecosystem, which is more common on Windows. The documentation does not provide parity for Linux-first or open-source workflows.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-native CI/CD examples (e.g., using Jenkins, GitLab CI, or ArgoCD) alongside Azure DevOps and GitHub workflows.
Offer explicit instructions for running Azure CLI and kubectl commands on Linux, including installation and troubleshooting tips.
Include alternative open-source registry solutions (e.g., Docker Hub, Harbor) and show how to integrate them with Kubernetes clusters.
Balance the depth and detail of GitHub workflow instructions to match those of Azure DevOps, ensuring equal guidance for both platforms.
Mention and link to Linux-specific documentation or community resources for GitOps and CI/CD in Kubernetes.
Clarify that Azure CLI and related tools are cross-platform, and provide guidance for users on Linux and macOS.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Quickstart: Connect an existing Kubernetes cluster to Azure Arc ...les/azure-arc/kubernetes/quickstart-connect-cluster.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. It consistently presents Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell instructions side-by-side, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence as Azure CLI, which is more cross-platform. When discussing how to create a Kubernetes cluster, Docker for Windows is mentioned explicitly alongside Docker for Mac, but Linux-native options (such as Minikube or native kubeadm) are not mentioned. Proxy environment variable examples are given for Bash (cross-platform) and PowerShell (Windows-centric), but do not mention Linux-specific shell variants or tools. There are no explicit Linux command-line examples (e.g., using Linux package managers, native Linux tools, or Linux-specific instructions), and Windows tools/patterns (PowerShell, Docker for Windows) are mentioned at least as prominently as their Linux equivalents.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux-native instructions and examples, such as using Minikube or kubeadm for cluster creation.
Include Linux shell environment variable examples (e.g., for bash/zsh) and clarify cross-platform applicability.
Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and can be used on Linux, Mac, and Windows, while PowerShell is primarily Windows-centric.
Present Linux-native tools and workflows before or alongside Windows-specific ones, rather than giving Windows tools equal or greater prominence.
Ensure troubleshooting and cleanup instructions include Linux-native commands and considerations.
Where Docker for Windows/Mac is mentioned, also mention Docker for Linux or other Linux-native container runtimes.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: "As a network administrator, I want to configure outbound and inbound connectivity settings for the appliance VM and management machine, so that I can ensure smooth communication and functionality for the Arc resource bridge." ...e-arc/resource-bridge/includes/network-requirements.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page shows evidence of Windows bias. Windows-specific services and endpoints (e.g., time.windows.com, login.windows.net, sts.windows.net, servicebus.windows.net) are mentioned, often without Linux equivalents or alternatives. The NTP server example references only the Windows NTP server, and several endpoints are prefixed with 'windows.net' or 'windows.com'. There are no explicit Linux/Powershell command examples, but the listing and notes favor Windows terminology and endpoints. Linux-specific requirements (such as time sync or package management) are underrepresented, with only a brief mention of packages.microsoft.com for Linux installation packages.

Recommendations

Include Linux NTP server options (e.g., pool.ntp.org) alongside time.windows.com, and clarify when to use each.
Add explicit notes or examples for Linux-based management machines, including relevant endpoints and tools.
Balance references to Windows endpoints with Linux equivalents where possible, or clarify cross-platform applicability.
Ensure that any Windows-specific instructions are matched with Linux alternatives, especially for network configuration and time synchronization.
Where endpoints are Windows-centric, explain their necessity for Linux appliances or provide context for Linux users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc overview ...nagement-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric virtualization and management tools (VMware vCenter, System Center Virtual Machine Manager, Azure Local) in its examples and feature descriptions. Linux is mentioned only in passing (e.g., 'Windows and Linux physical servers'), with no Linux-specific management tools or patterns highlighted. There are no explicit Linux-focused examples, nor is there parity in describing Linux-native virtualization or management solutions. The documentation also lists Windows/VMware tools before any mention of Linux, and does not provide Linux CLI or automation examples.

Recommendations

Add explicit examples and guidance for managing Linux servers and VMs, including references to popular Linux virtualization platforms (e.g., KVM, libvirt, Proxmox).
Provide Linux-specific CLI and automation examples (e.g., bash scripts, Ansible playbooks) alongside PowerShell and ARM/Bicep templates.
Include Linux-native management tools and patterns in feature lists and scenarios, ensuring they are described with equal detail and prominence as Windows tools.
Ensure that Linux and Windows examples are presented side-by-side or in parallel sections to demonstrate parity.
Reference Linux-specific documentation and best practices for hybrid management with Azure Arc.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc resource bridge security overview ...rticles/azure-arc/resource-bridge/security-overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell and Azure CLI as the primary methods for retrieving activity logs, without mentioning Linux-specific tools or providing Linux-first examples. There are no examples or instructions tailored for Linux users, and Windows-centric patterns (PowerShell) are mentioned before any cross-platform alternatives.

Recommendations

Include explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for retrieving activity logs using Azure CLI.
Mention cross-platform compatibility of Azure CLI and provide usage instructions for both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux (bash).
Avoid listing PowerShell before bash/Azure CLI, or present both together to ensure parity.
Add a section or note clarifying that all operations can be performed on Linux and macOS, not just Windows.
Where possible, provide links to Linux-specific documentation or troubleshooting guides.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Cloud-native patch management with Azure Arc-enabled servers ...les/azure-arc/servers/cloud-native/patch-management.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently referencing Windows-centric tools (WSUS, SCCM) and features (hotpatching) before mentioning Linux equivalents. Examples and analogies are almost exclusively drawn from Windows environments, and there are no concrete Linux-specific usage examples or scripts. Linux support is acknowledged, but details and practical guidance are minimal compared to Windows.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-specific examples for patch scheduling, compliance reporting, and automation (e.g., using shell scripts, cron jobs, or Ansible).
Mention Linux tools and patterns (such as apt, yum, dnf, zypper, and systemd timers) alongside or before Windows tools when discussing patch management workflows.
Include sample maintenance configurations and automation runbooks for common Linux distributions.
Expand the hotpatching section to clarify Linux kernel live patching support (if any) or explicitly state its absence.
Balance analogies and references to legacy tooling by including Linux equivalents (e.g., comparing SCCM to Red Hat Satellite or SUSE Manager).
Add screenshots or walkthroughs of the Azure Update Manager dashboard with Linux servers.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Overview of the Azure Connected Machine agent ...blob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/agent-overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_heavy_detail

Summary

The documentation provides detailed, step-by-step information for both Windows and Linux, but Windows installation details are presented first and in greater depth. Windows-specific tools (MSI installer, Group Policy, service accounts) are discussed at length, while Linux equivalents (package manager, systemd) are covered more briefly. Windows paths, services, and troubleshooting tips are more prominent, and Windows-specific patterns (e.g., Group Policy adjustments) are explained before or instead of Linux alternatives.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux sections, or present them in parallel tables for direct comparison.
Provide Linux-specific troubleshooting tips and configuration patterns (e.g., SELinux/AppArmor, systemd unit permissions) similar to the Group Policy guidance for Windows.
Expand Linux installation details to match the depth given to Windows (e.g., describe package manager commands, service management, user/group permissions).
Ensure that examples and instructions for both platforms are equally detailed and accessible.
Add explicit Linux-first examples or highlight Linux-specific considerations where appropriate.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Cloud-native scripting and task automation with Azure Arc-enabled servers ...-arc/servers/cloud-native/scripting-task-automation.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by frequently referencing Windows-centric tools and workflows (RDP, PowerShell, SCCM, Windows Task Scheduler) before or instead of Linux equivalents. PowerShell is emphasized as the primary scripting language, and examples lack explicit Linux shell (bash) or Linux-specific automation scenarios. Linux tools and workflows are mentioned only briefly or as secondary options, and example tasks do not showcase Linux-specific commands or patterns.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux shell (bash) script examples alongside PowerShell examples for Run Command and automation scenarios.
Mention Linux-native tools (such as cron, systemd, Ansible) in parity with Windows tools like Task Scheduler and SCCM.
Ensure Linux workflows (e.g., package installation via apt/yum, service management via systemctl) are described and exemplified.
Balance the language so that Linux and Windows are referenced equally, and avoid presenting Windows tools/patterns first unless contextually necessary.
Highlight Linux authentication and access patterns (e.g., SSH key management, sudo usage) in examples.
Include Linux-specific automation use cases, such as patching with yum/apt, log rotation, or configuration management.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Troubleshoot Azure Arc resource bridge issues ...re-arc/resource-bridge/troubleshoot-resource-bridge.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: Windows tools and patterns (PowerShell, RDP, Windows paths) are mentioned before or instead of Linux equivalents, troubleshooting steps and error messages often reference Windows-specific environments, and command-line examples (such as for network troubleshooting) use Windows commands (PowerShell, nslookup, ping) without providing Linux alternatives. There are also references to Windows-specific concepts (e.g., time.windows.com, RDP, Windows file paths) and some troubleshooting steps assume a Windows management machine. Linux-specific troubleshooting and command examples are largely missing, except for a brief mention of glibc errors.

Recommendations

Provide Linux equivalents for all command-line troubleshooting steps (e.g., use 'dig', 'host', or 'ping' for DNS/network checks on Linux).
Include Linux-specific instructions for common operations (e.g., SSH folder permissions, proxy configuration, log collection).
When referencing tools like PowerShell or RDP, also mention Linux alternatives (e.g., SSH, Remmina, xfreerdp).
Avoid Windows-centric terminology (e.g., Windows file paths, time.windows.com) or supplement with Linux equivalents (e.g., /etc/hosts, ntp.org).
Ensure error messages and troubleshooting steps are relevant for both Windows and Linux environments.
Add explicit guidance for supported Linux distributions and their requirements, especially for CLI and deployment scenarios.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Cloud-native server management with Azure Arc-enabled servers ...in/articles/azure-arc/servers/cloud-native/overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by frequently referencing Windows-centric management tools (Active Directory Group Policy, SCCM, MECM, PowerShell remoting, WSUS), and by explaining Azure Arc concepts in terms of their Windows analogs before mentioning Linux equivalents. Examples and analogies are almost exclusively Windows-based, and there is a lack of explicit Linux tooling or workflow examples. While the page states that Azure Arc supports both Windows and Linux, practical Linux management patterns and tools are not described or given equal prominence.

Recommendations

Add explicit examples and analogies for Linux management tools (e.g., compare Azure Policy to Ansible, Chef, or Puppet for configuration management on Linux).
Include references to Linux-native patching and inventory tools (such as apt, yum, dnf, dpkg, rpm, etc.) when discussing Azure Update Manager and inventory features.
Provide Linux-specific scripting examples (e.g., bash scripts, use of SSH, cron jobs) alongside or before PowerShell examples.
Balance Windows and Linux references in introductory and comparison sections, ensuring Linux administrators see familiar concepts and migration paths.
Highlight how Azure Arc replaces or integrates with common Linux management workflows, not just Windows ones.
Where licensing is discussed, mention Linux licensing considerations (e.g., RHEL, SUSE subscriptions) and how Azure Arc interacts with them.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc What's new with Azure Connected Machine agent ...main/articles/azure-arc/servers/agent-release-notes.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows-specific issues, tools, and troubleshooting steps are described in detail, often before or in greater depth than their Linux equivalents. Examples include explicit instructions for running the Windows installer via PowerShell or Command Prompt, references to Windows GUI and environment variables, and detailed notes on Windows-specific problems. Linux-specific instructions, troubleshooting, or tool references are less prominent or missing in some cases, such as installer troubleshooting and environment configuration.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Linux troubleshooting guidance, e.g., how to run the Linux installer with appropriate privileges (such as using sudo or shell commands).
Include Linux-specific examples for environment configuration, service management, and common issues (e.g., systemd, SELinux, file permissions).
Balance the order of presentation so that Windows and Linux instructions/examples are given equal prominence, or alternate which platform is presented first.
Add links or references to Linux tools and patterns (e.g., bash, systemctl, journalctl) where Windows tools (PowerShell, msiexec) are mentioned.
Ensure that all platform-specific changes, fixes, and features are described with equal detail for both Windows and Linux.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Choosing the right Azure Arc service for machines ...nt-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/choose-service.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias through several patterns: Windows-specific tools and services (e.g., SCVMM, Azure VMware Solution, Extended Security Updates for Windows Server) are mentioned prominently and sometimes exclusively. PowerShell is listed as a primary automation method, with no equivalent Bash or Linux shell examples. Windows-centric features (such as ESUs and pay-as-you-go management for Windows Server) are highlighted, while Linux-specific management scenarios are not discussed in detail. Examples and onboarding instructions often reference Windows tabs or processes first, and there is a lack of explicit Linux onboarding or usage examples.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux onboarding examples and instructions, including CLI/Bash commands and Linux-specific agent installation steps.
Include Linux management scenarios and highlight parity in features (e.g., update management, monitoring, automation) for Linux machines.
Provide automation examples using Bash or other Linux-native tools alongside PowerShell.
Balance the mention of Windows-specific features (such as ESUs) with Linux equivalents (e.g., kernel updates, security patching).
Ensure documentation links and tabs reference both Windows and Linux processes equally, avoiding Windows-first ordering.
Clarify which features and capabilities apply to Linux machines and provide guidance for mixed environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: As a system administrator managing a multi-node cluster, I want to configure Linux with HugePages and NVME modules, so that I can optimize performance for AKS Edge Essentials. ...ntainer-storage/includes/multi-node-edge-essentials.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively using PowerShell-based Invoke-AksEdgeNodeCommand for all Linux configuration steps. No native Linux shell commands or direct SSH examples are provided, and the workflow assumes the use of Windows tooling to manage Linux nodes, which may not be typical for Linux administrators.

Recommendations

Provide native Linux shell command examples for each step, showing how to run them directly on Linux nodes (e.g., via SSH or local terminal).
Include instructions for Linux-first workflows, such as using bash scripts or Ansible, rather than relying solely on Windows/PowerShell tools.
Clarify that PowerShell/Invoke-AksEdgeNodeCommand is optional, and offer Linux-native alternatives for cluster management tasks.
Ensure that Linux administrators can follow the documentation without requiring access to Windows or PowerShell environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: As a system administrator, I want to configure a single-node Kubernetes cluster with adequate resources and storage provisions, so that I can deploy and manage applications effectively using Azure IoT Operations and Azure Container Storage. ...tainer-storage/includes/single-node-edge-essentials.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page, while focused on Linux preparation, repeatedly uses Windows-centric tools and patterns such as Notepad for editing configuration files and the Invoke-AksEdgeNodeCommand cmdlet (a PowerShell command) to run Linux commands. These examples assume the administrator is operating from a Windows environment, even when managing Linux nodes, and do not provide equivalent Linux-native workflows or tools. This creates a bias toward Windows and PowerShell usage, potentially excluding or confusing users who administer Linux systems directly.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-native instructions for editing configuration files (e.g., using nano, vim, or vi instead of Notepad).
Replace or supplement PowerShell/Invoke-AksEdgeNodeCommand examples with direct Linux shell commands that can be run locally on the Linux node (e.g., sysctl, echo, tee).
Clarify when commands are intended to be run from a Windows host versus directly on a Linux system, and offer both options where appropriate.
Ensure that Linux-first workflows are presented, especially in documentation sections explicitly targeting Linux environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc-enabled data services - Automated validation testing ...ticles/azure-arc/data/automated-integration-testing.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation exhibits Windows bias primarily in the configuration file preparation section. It discusses Windows-specific issues (CRLF line endings) and provides guidance for Windows users (e.g., using VSCode to convert line endings), but does not offer equivalent instructions or tooling recommendations for Linux or macOS users. Additionally, screenshots and examples for Azure CLI and other tools are shown in PowerShell/Windows terminals, and there is no mention of Linux-specific editors or commands for line ending conversion. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows environments and tools, with Linux alternatives either omitted or mentioned only in passing.

Recommendations

Provide explicit instructions for Linux and macOS users on converting line endings (e.g., using 'dos2unix' or 'sed').
Include screenshots or terminal examples from Linux/macOS environments alongside Windows/PowerShell examples.
Mention Linux-native editors (e.g., nano, vim) and commands for editing configuration files.
Ensure that troubleshooting steps and tips are platform-neutral or include both Windows and Linux/macOS approaches.
Review all examples and tooling references to ensure parity and avoid prioritizing Windows tools or patterns.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Deploy Azure Arc-enabled data services in Active Directory authentication - prerequisites ...icles/azure-arc/data/active-directory-prerequisites.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias by exclusively referencing Windows tools (Active Directory Users and Computers), providing only PowerShell examples for object creation, and linking to a Windows Server-based domain controller setup guide. There are no examples or instructions for performing equivalent tasks on Linux-based environments, nor is there mention of cross-platform alternatives for Active Directory management.

Recommendations

Include instructions and examples for managing Active Directory objects using cross-platform tools such as 'ldapadd', 'samba-tool', or 'adcli' on Linux.
Provide equivalent command-line examples for Linux environments, such as using 'samba-tool' to create OUs and users.
Reference guides for setting up Active Directory domain controllers using Samba on Linux, in addition to the Windows Server guide.
Clarify any platform requirements or limitations, and explicitly state if certain steps are only possible on Windows, or provide alternatives where feasible.
Add screenshots or walkthroughs for Linux-based management tools where applicable.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Back up controller database .../articles/azure-arc/data/backup-controller-database.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by providing command-line examples using Powershell syntax and conventions (e.g., using Powershell code blocks and Windows-style quoting), without offering equivalent Linux shell (bash) examples. The SQL Server connectivity and backup/restore commands are shown only in Powershell, and there is no mention of Linux-specific tools or patterns for interacting with the SQL Server instance inside the Kubernetes pod. This may hinder Linux users from following the instructions seamlessly.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent bash shell examples alongside Powershell commands, especially for kubectl exec and sqlcmd usage.
Use generic code blocks (e.g., 'console' or 'sh') for commands that work cross-platform, and clarify any OS-specific differences.
Explicitly mention that the commands can be run from both Windows and Linux environments, and note any required adjustments (such as quoting or path separators).
Include Linux-specific troubleshooting tips or references to Linux tools where relevant.
Avoid using only Powershell code blocks for kubectl and sqlcmd commands; use neutral formatting or provide both variants.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Encrypt a database with transparent data encryption manually in SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc ...data/configure-transparent-data-encryption-manually.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_path_examples

Summary

The documentation presents both Windows and Linux examples for file operations, but Windows instructions and examples are consistently listed before Linux ones. Windows-specific tools and path conventions (e.g., use of 'type', backslashes in $HOME\sqlcerts) are featured, and there are multiple notes about Windows-specific issues (such as kubectl cp failing with absolute Windows paths). No PowerShell-specific commands are given, but the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows command-line tools and patterns, and Windows is prioritized in tab order and troubleshooting notes.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux examples to avoid implicit prioritization.
Add troubleshooting notes for Linux users if relevant, not just Windows.
Use neutral path variables and examples (e.g., $HOME/sqlcerts for both platforms) where possible.
Explicitly state that both Windows and Linux are supported and provide parity in instructions.
Consider including macOS examples or notes if applicable.
Where platform-specific commands are required, explain why and offer alternatives.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Connect to SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc ...in/articles/azure-arc/data/connect-managed-instance.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric tools (SQL Server Management Studio, Azure Data Studio) and workflows. Examples and instructions reference Windows tools first, and there is a lack of Linux-specific client guidance (e.g., no mention of common Linux SQL clients besides sqlcmd, no Linux firewall configuration examples). The documentation assumes familiarity with Azure VM and NSG, which are more commonly used in Windows-centric environments. Linux alternatives and parity are not adequately addressed.

Recommendations

Include examples using popular Linux SQL clients (e.g., DBeaver, SquirrelSQL, isql) alongside Azure Data Studio and SSMS.
Provide explicit instructions for configuring Linux firewalls (e.g., using ufw or firewalld) to expose SQL ports, in addition to NSG rules.
Present connection examples for both Windows and Linux environments, ensuring equal visibility and detail.
Mention cross-platform tools and clarify which steps are OS-agnostic, reducing implicit Windows-first assumptions.
Add troubleshooting tips for common Linux networking issues (e.g., SELinux, iptables) when connecting to SQL Managed Instance.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Turn on transparent data encryption in SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc (preview) ...igure-transparent-data-encryption-sql-managed-instance.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_path_examples ⚠️ windows_notes

Summary

The documentation provides both Windows and Linux examples for file operations (copying certificates/keys to and from containers), but Windows instructions and notes are often presented first or given special attention. Windows path syntax (e.g., $HOME\sqlcerts) is used in examples, and there are explicit notes about Windows-specific issues (such as kubectl cp failing with absolute Windows paths), while Linux equivalents are presented second. No PowerShell-specific commands or Windows-only tools are used, and the main workflow uses cross-platform tools (Azure CLI, kubectl, openssl).

Recommendations

Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, or alternate which comes first to avoid implicit prioritization.
Use cross-platform path variables (e.g., $HOME/sqlcerts) in generic examples, or clarify both syntaxes.
Add notes for Linux-specific issues if any exist, to balance the Windows-specific troubleshooting.
Consider grouping platform-specific instructions under clear headings, and ensure parity in detail and troubleshooting for both platforms.
Review all examples to ensure neither platform is implicitly prioritized in ordering or detail.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Connect to AD-integrated SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc .../data/connect-active-directory-sql-managed-instance.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a Windows-first bias by mentioning Windows-based client machines before Linux, referencing Windows-specific tools (SQL Server Management Studio, SSMS) and patterns, and providing more detailed instructions and screenshots for Windows tools. While Linux connection steps are present, they are less detailed and lack parity in graphical tool examples (e.g., no Linux-specific GUI walkthroughs for Azure Data Studio). There is also an implicit assumption of Windows environments (Active Directory, NetBIOS domain names) and no mention of Linux-native alternatives or troubleshooting.

Recommendations

Provide equal prominence to Linux and Windows instructions, including listing Linux connection steps before or alongside Windows steps.
Include screenshots and step-by-step instructions for connecting from Azure Data Studio on Linux.
Mention Linux-native alternatives to SSMS (such as Azure Data Studio) and provide parity in graphical walkthroughs.
Add troubleshooting tips for Kerberos authentication on Linux, including common configuration issues.
Clarify any differences in experience or requirements between Windows and Linux clients.
Reference cross-platform tools and avoid Windows-centric terminology where possible.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Prerequisites | Direct connect mode ...rc/data/create-data-controller-direct-prerequisites.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for connecting a Kubernetes cluster to Azure Arc, but the PowerShell example is given equal prominence to the CLI example, despite PowerShell being primarily a Windows tool. There are no Linux-specific shell examples (e.g., bash), and installation instructions for Azure CLI do not mention Linux explicitly. The documentation does not reference Linux-native tools or patterns, and the use of PowerShell may suggest a Windows-centric approach.

Recommendations

Prioritize Azure CLI (cross-platform) examples before PowerShell, as CLI is natively supported on Linux and macOS.
Explicitly mention that Azure CLI and Helm are available on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide installation instructions for each OS.
Add bash shell examples for common tasks, such as verifying pods or connecting clusters.
Clarify that PowerShell is optional and primarily for Windows users; suggest bash/zsh for Linux/macOS users.
Include troubleshooting or usage notes relevant to Linux environments (e.g., permissions, package managers).

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Deploy Active Directory-integrated SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc ...c/data/deploy-active-directory-sql-managed-instance.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation demonstrates some Windows bias, particularly in the prerequisites and preparation steps. Windows tools (Active Directory Users and Computers, setspn, ktpass) are mentioned first or exclusively for key operations like account creation and SPN registration, with Linux alternatives listed later or less prominently. The example scripts are split by OS, but Windows PowerShell (.ps1) is called out as a main option. The process for creating accounts and DNS records assumes access to Windows-centric tools and domain controllers, with little guidance for Linux-based management environments.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-first or Linux-parity examples for all major steps, especially for account creation and SPN registration (e.g., using Samba tools like samba-tool, ldapadd, or adutil).
Explicitly mention and document how to perform all Active Directory and DNS operations from Linux environments, not just referencing Windows tools.
Ensure Linux tools (adutil, ktutil) are listed before or alongside Windows tools (ktpass), and provide detailed usage instructions for each.
Add guidance for managing Active Directory from Linux, including using open-source tools and command-line utilities.
Where possible, avoid assuming access to Windows domain controllers or GUIs; offer CLI alternatives for Linux admins.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Tutorial – Deploy Active Directory connector using Azure portal ...e-arc/data/deploy-active-directory-connector-portal.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Active Directory, a Windows-centric identity solution, and using terminology and patterns (e.g., NetBIOS, domain controllers, OU distinguished names) that are specific to Windows environments. There are no examples or guidance for Linux-based directory services (such as OpenLDAP) or integration patterns for non-Windows environments. All examples and screenshots are based on the Azure portal interface, which is agnostic, but the underlying concepts and required infrastructure are Windows-centric. No Linux equivalents or cross-platform considerations are mentioned.

Recommendations

Add guidance or links for integrating with Linux-based directory services (e.g., OpenLDAP, FreeIPA) where possible.
Explicitly state the Windows-centric nature of the prerequisites and provide recommendations for Linux users or alternatives.
Include examples or notes for hybrid environments where Linux hosts may need to authenticate against AD, or where non-Windows directory services are used.
If Azure Arc supports only Active Directory, clarify this limitation and suggest workarounds or roadmap for Linux parity.
Consider adding CLI or script examples that demonstrate cross-platform usage (e.g., Bash, Linux tools) in addition to portal-based instructions.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Tutorial – Deploy Active Directory (AD) Connector in customer-managed keytab mode ...loy-customer-managed-keytab-active-directory-connector.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing Active Directory (a Windows technology), using Windows-centric terminology (NetBIOS, pre-Windows 2000 name), and providing examples that assume a Windows-based AD environment. There are no examples or guidance for integrating with non-Windows directory services or for Linux-based AD alternatives. The documentation does not mention Linux tools or patterns for managing keytabs or Kerberos, nor does it provide parity for Linux administrators who may need to interact with AD from non-Windows systems.

Recommendations

Add examples and guidance for generating and managing keytab files using Linux tools (e.g., ktutil, kadmin).
Include references to cross-platform Kerberos utilities and how to interact with AD from Linux systems.
Clarify whether the AD connector supports integration with Samba-based AD or other non-Windows directory services.
Provide Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and command-line examples for validating Kerberos and DNS connectivity.
Balance terminology by explaining Windows-specific concepts (e.g., NetBIOS) in a way that is accessible to Linux administrators.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Install client tools ...b/main/articles/azure-arc/data/install-client-tools.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page shows evidence of Windows bias. Windows installation links are listed first for several tools, and there are specific notes about using cmd.exe instead of PowerShell for curl on Windows 10. There is also a mention that in PowerShell, 'curl' is an alias for Invoke-WebRequest, which is a Windows-specific behavior. Linux installation instructions are less detailed (e.g., 'install curl package') and sometimes missing explicit commands or parity in explanation. No Linux-specific shell or tool usage is described, and Windows nuances are explained in more detail.

Recommendations

Present installation instructions for all platforms (Windows, Linux, macOS) in parallel, not with Windows first.
Provide explicit Linux installation commands (e.g., apt-get, yum, zypper) for tools like curl.
Include notes about Linux-specific shell behaviors or common issues, similar to the PowerShell/cmd.exe note for Windows.
Balance platform-specific caveats and tips, ensuring Linux users receive as much guidance as Windows users.
Add examples or references for using the tools in Linux environments, not just Windows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Features and Capabilities of SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc ...n/articles/azure-arc/data/managed-instance-features.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific tools (e.g., SQL Server Management Studio, SQL Server PowerShell, SQL Server Profiler), highlighting PowerShell scripting support, and mentioning Windows Authentication as a feature. There is no mention of Linux-native tools, Linux authentication methods, or cross-platform scripting alternatives. Examples and tool references are either Windows-only or Windows-first, with no Linux parity or guidance.

Recommendations

Include examples and references to Linux-native or cross-platform tools (e.g., sqlcmd, Azure Data Studio on Linux, mssql-cli).
Mention and provide guidance for Linux authentication methods (e.g., Kerberos, certificate-based authentication) where applicable.
Highlight cross-platform scripting options such as Bash, Python, or Azure CLI, not just PowerShell.
When listing tools, clarify which are cross-platform and provide installation/use instructions for Linux.
Balance the mention/order of Windows and Linux tools and features to avoid Windows-first perception.
If a feature is only available on Windows, explicitly state so and suggest Linux alternatives or workarounds where possible.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Resize persistent volume claim (PVC) for Azure Arc-enabled data services volume ...icles/azure-arc/data/resize-persistent-volume-claim.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias primarily through the use of PowerShell-style variable assignment (e.g., $newsize='...') in command examples, which is specific to Windows/PowerShell environments. There is no mention of Linux shell equivalents (such as Bash), nor are Linux-specific command patterns provided. The documentation assumes the user is operating in a Windows/PowerShell context, which may confuse or exclude Linux users.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Bash shell examples for all commands that use PowerShell syntax, such as using `newsize='{...}'` in Bash.
Explicitly mention that the variable assignment example is for PowerShell, and offer a Linux/Bash alternative.
Where environment-specific commands are given, present both Windows and Linux versions side-by-side or indicate which OS each applies to.
Review all command examples and ensure they are cross-platform or clearly marked for their intended environment.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Rotate customer-managed keytab ...icles/azure-arc/data/rotate-customer-managed-keytab.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows-specific tools (ktpass.exe, Server Manager, Active Directory Users and Computers) are mentioned explicitly, and the PowerShell/Windows workflow is described in detail. The password reset instructions are exclusively for Windows domain controllers, with no mention of Linux-based alternatives or cross-platform AD management tools. While both bash and PowerShell scripts are provided for keytab rotation, the Windows tool (ktpass.exe) is called out by name, and the password reset steps are only shown for Windows.

Recommendations

Add instructions for resetting Active Directory passwords using cross-platform tools (e.g., samba-tool, ldapmodify) for environments where the domain controller is running on Linux.
Explicitly mention Linux equivalents for all Windows tools referenced (e.g., ktutil/adutil vs ktpass.exe), and clarify which platforms each script/tool supports.
Provide screenshots or CLI examples for Linux-based AD management where appropriate.
Ensure that bash/Linux instructions are given equal prominence and detail as Windows/PowerShell instructions.
Add a table or section summarizing platform-specific steps and tools for keytab rotation and AD password management.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Upload usage data, metrics, and logs to Azure ...e-arc/data/upload-metrics-and-logs-to-azure-monitor.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation provides both Windows and Linux/macOS examples for environment variable setting and role assignment, but Windows examples (including PowerShell) are presented first and with more detailed notes (such as quoting requirements). There is a link to a PowerShell-specific service principal guide in 'Related content', but no equivalent Bash or Linux shell guide. The documentation references Windows-specific patterns (e.g., SET, double quotes) before Linux equivalents, and PowerShell is given its own tab, suggesting a slight prioritization of Windows tooling and workflows.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux/macOS examples, or present Linux/macOS first to balance visibility.
Add links to Linux/Bash-specific guides for service principal creation and Azure CLI usage in 'Related content'.
Ensure all notes (such as quoting requirements) are provided for both Windows and Linux/macOS where relevant.
Consider merging Windows and Linux/macOS instructions when the commands are nearly identical, highlighting only the differences.
Add explicit mention that all CLI commands work cross-platform unless otherwise noted, to reinforce parity.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Upload metrics to Azure Monitor ...cs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/data/upload-metrics.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. PowerShell examples are presented first in most code tabs, and Windows-specific instructions (such as environment variable setting) are included. However, Linux/macOS examples are present and generally complete. Some automation examples (e.g., shell scripting and use of 'chmod', 'watch', and 'cron') are Linux-centric, with only brief mention of Windows Task Scheduler and script file extensions for Windows (.cmd, .bat, .ps1) but no concrete Windows automation example. In several sections, Windows tabs are marked 'N/A', indicating missing or incomplete parity for Windows users. The use of PowerShell as the primary scripting environment for Windows, and the order of tabs (PowerShell first), also suggest a subtle Windows-first approach.

Recommendations

Provide concrete Windows automation examples, such as a sample .bat or PowerShell script and instructions for scheduling with Windows Task Scheduler.
Ensure that both Linux/macOS and Windows tabs contain complete, working examples for all steps, or clearly state platform limitations.
Consider alternating the order of code tabs or presenting Linux/macOS examples first in some sections to balance the perceived bias.
Expand on Windows-specific tools (e.g., Task Scheduler) with step-by-step guidance, similar to the detail given for Linux cron jobs.
Where Windows is marked 'N/A', clarify why (e.g., not supported, or alternative method required), and suggest workarounds if possible.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Configure Machine to Manage Arc-Enabled Kubernetes Cluster ...rticles/azure-arc/edge-rag/configure-driver-machine.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation is heavily biased towards Windows, providing only a Windows/PowerShell script and instructions for configuring a Windows machine. There are no Linux or cross-platform examples, and all tooling references (paths, downloads, installation methods) are Windows-specific. The documentation does not mention or provide guidance for Linux users, nor does it offer parity in setup instructions for non-Windows environments.

Recommendations

Add equivalent Linux setup instructions and sample scripts (e.g., Bash shell script) for installing Azure CLI, kubectl, and Helm.
Include download links and installation commands for Linux distributions (Ubuntu, CentOS, etc.) alongside Windows instructions.
Use cross-platform language in the introduction and throughout the documentation, clarifying that the process can be performed on both Windows and Linux machines.
Provide guidance on setting environment variables and PATH modifications for Linux (e.g., using ~/.bashrc or ~/.profile).
Reference Linux-specific package managers (apt, yum) and installation methods for the required tools.
Ensure all CLI commands (az, kubectl, helm) are shown in a way that works on both platforms, or provide platform-specific notes.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Configure "BYOM" Endpoint Authentication for Edge RAG ...zure-arc/edge-rag/configure-endpoint-authentication.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page provides only PowerShell examples and uses Windows-specific patterns (e.g., '.\kubectl.exe'), with no Linux or bash equivalents. All command-line instructions assume a Windows environment, and there is no mention of how to perform these steps on Linux or macOS systems.

Recommendations

Add equivalent bash/Linux/macOS command examples alongside PowerShell commands.
Use platform-neutral command syntax for kubectl (e.g., 'kubectl' instead of '.\kubectl.exe') unless platform-specific behavior is required.
Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility and note any differences in command usage or output.
Provide guidance for Linux users on how to decode base64 secrets (e.g., using 'base64 --decode').
Include a note or section on prerequisites for both Windows and Linux environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Deploy the Edge RAG Extension ...t-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/edge-rag/deploy.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in its Azure CLI section by exclusively providing PowerShell-based examples and variable assignments, which are specific to Windows environments. There are no Bash or Linux shell equivalents, and the command syntax (including backticks for line continuation) is tailored for PowerShell. The documentation does not mention or provide guidance for Linux or macOS users, nor does it offer alternative shell examples. The Azure portal instructions are platform-neutral, but the CLI instructions assume a Windows/PowerShell context.

Recommendations

Add equivalent Bash/Linux shell examples for all Azure CLI commands, including variable assignments and command syntax.
Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide guidance for Linux/macOS users.
Avoid using PowerShell-specific syntax (such as backticks for line continuation) in CLI documentation, or provide both PowerShell and Bash alternatives.
Include notes or tabs for different operating systems (e.g., Windows/PowerShell, Linux/Bash, macOS) to ensure parity and accessibility for all users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Prepare AKS Cluster on Azure Local for Edge RAG Preview Enabled by Azure Arc ...ain/articles/azure-arc/edge-rag/prepare-aks-cluster.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page shows a strong Windows bias: all code examples use PowerShell syntax, commands reference Windows-specific tools (e.g., Restart-Service), and instructions for management setup explicitly point to configuring a Windows machine. There are no Bash or Linux shell examples, nor guidance for Linux-based management hosts. Windows tools and patterns are mentioned exclusively, with no Linux alternatives provided.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Bash/Linux shell commands alongside PowerShell examples for all steps.
Include instructions for setting up a Linux management host, with relevant package installation commands (e.g., apt, yum) for Azure CLI, kubectl, Helm, etc.
Reference Linux system service management commands (e.g., systemctl) where applicable, or clarify if steps are Windows-only.
Clearly indicate platform-specific requirements and offer parity in documentation for both Windows and Linux users.
Add a section or callout for Linux prerequisites and troubleshooting, ensuring Linux users can follow all steps without ambiguity.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Install Networking and Observability Components for Edge RAG Preview Enabled by Azure Arc ...azure-arc/edge-rag/prepare-networking-observability.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page exclusively provides PowerShell-based command examples for installing MetalLB and observability modules, with no mention of Linux shell equivalents or cross-platform instructions. All steps assume a Windows environment, and there is no guidance for Linux users or alternative tools.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Bash or shell command examples for Linux and macOS environments alongside PowerShell commands.
Clarify platform requirements and explicitly state if steps are cross-platform or Windows-specific.
Include instructions for installing required CLI tools (e.g., Azure CLI, kubectl, helm) on Linux.
Add notes or sections for Linux users, highlighting any differences in procedure or prerequisites.
Ensure that all referenced scripts and commands are tested and validated on both Windows and Linux platforms.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Configure Authentication for Edge RAG Preview Enabled by Azure Arc .../articles/azure-arc/edge-rag/prepare-authentication.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific tools (e.g., Notepad) and omitting Linux equivalents. All instructions assume use of the Azure Portal web UI, which is platform-neutral, but the only explicit tool mentioned for storing IDs is Windows Notepad. There are no examples or suggestions for Linux users (such as using gedit, nano, or command-line storage). No PowerShell commands are present, but there is a general lack of Linux parity in tool recommendations and examples.

Recommendations

When suggesting tools for storing IDs, mention both Windows (Notepad) and Linux (gedit, nano, or simply using the terminal).
Include examples of how to retrieve and store application and tenant IDs using the Azure CLI, which is cross-platform.
Explicitly state that all steps can be performed from any OS with a web browser, and offer alternative instructions for Linux users where appropriate.
Avoid referencing Windows-specific tools exclusively; provide parity for Linux and macOS users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Requirements for Edge RAG Preview, Enabled by Azure Arc .../blob/main/articles/azure-arc/edge-rag/requirements.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_example_priority

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. In the NFS setup section, the Windows Server guide is listed before the Linux guide, and the Windows Server link is an official Microsoft documentation page, while the Linux link is to a third-party site. The 'Windows machine (optional)' section emphasizes using a Windows machine for management, with no equivalent mention of Linux management hosts or instructions. The hardware requirements section references AKS on Windows Server, and there is a general tendency to mention Windows-related tools and patterns before their Linux equivalents.

Recommendations

Provide Linux management host instructions alongside Windows, including tool installation (Azure CLI, kubectl, Helm) for Linux.
List Linux NFS setup guides before or alongside Windows Server guides, preferably linking to official Linux documentation (e.g., kernel.org, distribution-specific docs).
Ensure hardware requirements and resource links reference both Windows and Linux environments equally, or clarify when Windows-specific information is relevant.
Where Windows is mentioned as 'optional', clarify that Linux is equally supported and provide parity in setup steps.
Review all examples and instructions to ensure Linux users are not disadvantaged or required to infer steps from Windows-centric guidance.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Uninstall Edge RAG Extension ...ain/articles/azure-arc/edge-rag/uninstall-extension.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only PowerShell examples for command-line operations, using Windows-centric tools and syntax (e.g., PowerShell variables, code blocks), and omitting equivalent Linux shell/bash examples. The instructions and code samples assume a Windows environment, even for cross-platform tools like Azure CLI and kubectl, and do not mention or show how to perform these tasks on Linux or macOS systems.

Recommendations

Add Linux/bash shell examples alongside PowerShell for all command-line instructions, using appropriate syntax and environment variables.
Clarify that Azure CLI and kubectl are cross-platform tools and provide guidance for their installation and usage on Linux/macOS.
Avoid using PowerShell-specific syntax (e.g., $variable) in generic instructions; use environment-agnostic notation or provide both PowerShell and bash equivalents.
Explicitly mention platform differences where relevant, and ensure parity in step-by-step instructions for Linux and macOS users.
Consider adding tabs or sections for 'Linux/macOS (bash)' and 'Windows (PowerShell)' to improve accessibility for all users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: As a cloud administrator, I want to list all Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes resources, so that I can monitor and manage the connected clusters and their configurations effectively. ...les/azure-arc/includes/azure-arc-enabled-kubernetes.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides examples for Azure CLI, Azure PowerShell, and the Azure Portal for each query. While Azure CLI is cross-platform, Azure PowerShell is primarily used and associated with Windows environments. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash, zsh) or scripting examples, nor are Linux-specific tools or patterns mentioned. The order of examples consistently presents Azure CLI first, followed by Azure PowerShell, which may suggest a slight Windows-first bias. No Linux-native command-line alternatives (e.g., bash scripts, jq, curl) are provided.

Recommendations

Add explicit bash/zsh shell examples for Linux users, especially for scripting or automation scenarios.
Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide usage notes for Linux environments (e.g., installation, authentication differences).
Include Linux-specific troubleshooting tips or notes where PowerShell commands may not be available.
Consider adding examples using REST API calls with curl or HTTPie for users who prefer not to use Azure CLI or PowerShell.
Balance the order of examples or explicitly state platform parity to avoid perceived prioritization of Windows tools.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: "As a cloud administrator, I want to retrieve the list of enabled resource types for Azure Arc-enabled custom locations, so that I can manage and utilize those resources effectively in our hybrid cloud environment." ...ocs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/includes/azure-arc.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides examples for Azure CLI, Azure PowerShell, and the Azure Portal. While Azure CLI is cross-platform, the inclusion of Azure PowerShell (which is historically Windows-centric, though now available on Linux/macOS) and the absence of explicit Linux shell (bash/sh) examples or references to Linux-native tools (such as scripting with curl, jq, or bash) indicates a mild Windows bias. The PowerShell example is always present and given equal prominence to CLI, and there are no Linux-specific usage notes or examples.

Recommendations

Add explicit bash/shell examples for running Azure CLI commands on Linux, including sample output parsing with jq or grep.
Clarify that Azure CLI commands work identically on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide any OS-specific notes if relevant.
If PowerShell is shown, consider also showing bash equivalents for scripting scenarios.
Mention installation or usage differences for Azure CLI and PowerShell on Linux, if any.
Highlight cross-platform compatibility for all tools used, and avoid implying PowerShell is the primary or preferred method.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure RBAC on Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes clusters .../blob/main/articles/azure-arc/kubernetes/azure-rbac.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Azure CLI is used throughout, which is cross-platform, but installation and usage instructions for supporting tools (like kubelogin) mention Windows and Mac before Linux. Portal-based instructions and screenshots are Windows-centric. There are no explicit PowerShell examples, but the Azure CLI commands are often shown in a way that is more familiar to Windows users. Linux-specific instructions (such as kubelogin installation) are present but appear after Windows/Mac instructions, and there is limited mention of Linux-native patterns or tools. There are no Linux-only examples, and the documentation does not highlight Linux-specific considerations for SSH, file editing, or permissions, which are relevant for cluster administration.

Recommendations

Present Linux instructions before or alongside Windows/Mac instructions, especially for tool installation (e.g., kubelogin).
Include explicit Linux-native examples for SSH, file editing (e.g., using nano or vim), and file permissions.
Add guidance for Linux package managers (apt, yum, etc.) for installing dependencies like unzip and curl.
Provide parity in portal screenshots by mentioning that the Azure portal is accessible from any OS/browser.
Clarify that Azure CLI commands work identically on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and note any OS-specific caveats.
Add troubleshooting tips for common Linux issues (e.g., permissions, environment variables, file paths).
Where possible, use OS-neutral language and avoid ordering instructions in a way that prioritizes Windows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Simplify network configuration requirements with Azure Arc gateway (preview) ...zure-arc/kubernetes/arc-gateway-simplify-networking.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation consistently presents both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for resource creation and management. However, PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and in some sections, PowerShell environment variable syntax is shown without equivalent Linux/Bash examples. There are no explicit Linux/Bash command examples for setting environment variables or running commands outside of Azure CLI, and no mention of Linux-specific patterns or considerations. This may disadvantage Linux users, who are more likely to use Bash and native Linux tools.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux/Bash examples for setting environment variables (e.g., export HTTP_PROXY, HTTPS_PROXY, NO_PROXY) wherever PowerShell examples are shown.
Clarify that Azure CLI commands are cross-platform and provide any necessary Linux-specific notes (e.g., shell syntax, permissions).
Where PowerShell commands are shown, provide equivalent Bash/Linux commands, especially for environment setup and scripting.
Review the order of examples: consider presenting Azure CLI (cross-platform) examples first, followed by PowerShell.
Mention any Linux-specific considerations for proxy configuration, certificate management, or troubleshooting.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Use cluster connect to securely connect to Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes clusters. .../main/articles/azure-arc/kubernetes/cluster-connect.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for most steps, but the PowerShell examples are given equal prominence to CLI, and some shell commands (e.g., kubectl get pods -A) are shown in PowerShell syntax. There is no explicit mention or example of Linux/macOS shell environments (e.g., Bash), nor are Linux-specific patterns (such as environment variable export or file redirection) demonstrated. The use of PowerShell variable assignment and command substitution may be unfamiliar or incompatible with Linux users, and the lack of Bash examples may hinder parity.

Recommendations

Add explicit Bash/Linux/macOS shell examples alongside Azure CLI and PowerShell, especially for environment variable assignment and command substitution.
When showing kubectl commands, use generic shell syntax (e.g., $TOKEN in Bash) or provide both Bash and PowerShell variants.
Clarify that Azure CLI commands work cross-platform and provide guidance for Linux/macOS users where file paths, environment variables, or shell behavior differ.
Avoid using PowerShell-specific syntax (e.g., $TOKEN = ...) as the only example for steps that are likely to be performed on Linux/macOS.
Consider using tabs for 'Bash' and 'PowerShell' where shell commands are shown, to ensure parity and clarity for all users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: As a network administrator, I want to configure outbound network access for Azure Arc agents in the Azure public cloud, so that they can connect to necessary endpoints for proper functionality and management of connected clusters. ...ubernetes/includes/network-requirements-azure-cloud.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by listing endpoints and services with 'windows.net' and 'windows.com' domains before Linux-specific ones, referencing Windows-centric authentication endpoints (e.g., login.windows.net, sts.windows.net), and lacking explicit Linux or cross-platform configuration examples. The only Linux-specific endpoint ('linuxgeneva-microsoft.azurecr.io') is mentioned last and without context or parity in instructions. No Linux command-line or firewall configuration examples are provided, and there is no mention of Linux tools or patterns for network configuration.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux examples for configuring outbound network access (e.g., using iptables, firewalld, or ufw).
Provide parity in endpoint explanations, clarifying which endpoints are relevant for Linux, Windows, or both.
Include Linux command-line instructions for translating wildcards or checking connectivity (e.g., using curl, wget, or dig).
Balance the order of endpoint listings so Linux-related endpoints are not always last.
Reference Linux authentication patterns or tools (such as using Azure CLI on Linux) where appropriate.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Diagnose connection issues for Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes clusters ...les/azure-arc/kubernetes/diagnose-connection-issues.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation provides both Linux and Windows examples for DNS troubleshooting in Kubernetes pods, but Windows-specific tools (PowerShell, Resolve-DnsName) and instructions are given in detail and are called out explicitly. The Windows example is presented after the Linux example, but it is described with more steps and references to Windows-specific commands and images. There is also a reference to the Windows nslookup documentation, even though the Linux context is used. Overall, the page is mostly neutral, but the inclusion and emphasis of Windows tools and PowerShell usage introduces a mild Windows bias.

Recommendations

Ensure Linux and Windows troubleshooting steps are presented with equal detail and clarity.
Provide explicit Linux equivalents for all Windows commands and tools mentioned (e.g., show how to use dig or host in Linux alongside Resolve-DnsName in Windows).
Reference Linux documentation for commands like nslookup, not just Windows documentation.
Consider grouping Linux and Windows instructions separately for clarity, or provide a table comparing commands side-by-side.
Avoid unnecessary emphasis on Windows-specific tools unless required by the scenario.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes system requirements ...n/articles/azure-arc/kubernetes/system-requirements.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently listing Azure PowerShell instructions alongside or before Azure CLI, referencing PowerShell modules, and using terminology and patterns familiar to Windows users. There is no mention of Linux-specific shell environments (bash, zsh), nor are Linux-native package managers or command-line patterns (e.g., apt, yum, curl) referenced. The documentation assumes the use of Azure CLI or PowerShell, both of which are more commonly associated with Windows, and does not provide explicit Linux shell examples or guidance for Linux users.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux shell (bash/zsh) examples for all CLI commands, including environment setup and prerequisites.
Mention Linux-native installation methods for Azure CLI (e.g., apt, yum, snap) and Helm, and clarify compatibility with Linux distributions.
Reorder examples to present Azure CLI (cross-platform) before Azure PowerShell (Windows-centric), or clarify that both are cross-platform but CLI is more common on Linux.
Include troubleshooting or notes for Linux-specific environments (e.g., permissions, file paths, package dependencies).
Reference Linux-native tools and patterns where appropriate, such as using curl/wget for downloads, and provide links to Linux documentation.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Simplify Network Configuration Requirements with Azure Arc Gateway ...cs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/arc-gateway.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page exhibits several forms of Windows bias. Windows and PowerShell examples are consistently provided and often appear before Linux equivalents, especially in command-line and log file instructions. Windows-specific tools and scenarios (e.g., Windows Admin Center, Windows OS Update Extension) are highlighted, while Linux examples are sometimes missing or less detailed. The onboarding and management instructions focus more on Windows environments, and references to Linux are often brief or secondary.

Recommendations

Ensure that Linux command-line examples (e.g., Bash, shell scripts) are provided alongside PowerShell and Windows instructions, and presented with equal prominence.
Include Linux-specific onboarding and management scenarios, with step-by-step instructions and troubleshooting tips.
Where Windows tools or extensions are mentioned (e.g., Windows Admin Center, Windows OS Update Extension), provide equivalent Linux tools or clarify Linux alternatives.
Present examples and instructions in a platform-neutral order (e.g., CLI, Linux shell, PowerShell) or group them together, rather than listing Windows/PowerShell first.
Expand documentation on Linux log file locations, agent management, and proxy configuration to match the detail provided for Windows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc network requirements ...rticles/azure-arc/network-requirements-consolidated.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a bias toward Windows environments by referencing Windows-centric tools and platforms (e.g., VMware vSphere, System Center Virtual Machine Manager, Azure Stack HCI, SQL Server) and omitting Linux-specific examples or tools. The order of presentation prioritizes Windows-based scenarios, and there are no explicit Linux or cross-platform command-line examples (e.g., Bash, curl, iptables). This may make it harder for Linux administrators to map requirements to their environments.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux-based examples for network configuration and endpoint testing (e.g., using curl, iptables, or netcat).
Include references to Linux server scenarios and clarify requirements for common Linux distributions.
Present Windows and Linux tools and patterns in parallel, ensuring that Linux equivalents are mentioned alongside Windows ones.
Expand the documentation to cover Linux-specific considerations for Azure Arc connectivity, such as SELinux, firewalld, or systemd-networkd.
Review and update included content to ensure Linux parity in all endpoint, port, and protocol lists.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Archive for What's new with Azure Connected Machine agent ...icles/azure-arc/servers/agent-release-notes-archive.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows download links are consistently listed before Linux, and Windows-specific tools (PowerShell, MSI installer, Windows Event Logs, Windows cert store) are frequently mentioned and upgraded. PowerShell updates are highlighted as major features, and Windows-specific enhancements (GUI installer, event logs, WMI, Win32 API, Windows Admin Center) are called out in multiple releases. While Linux improvements and distribution support are present, Windows tooling and terminology often appear first or exclusively, and some features (e.g., GUI installer, cert store integration) are only described for Windows.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux download links or present them together to avoid implicit prioritization.
Ensure Linux equivalents are mentioned for all Windows-specific features (e.g., describe Linux logging mechanisms alongside Windows Event Logs).
Highlight major Linux toolchain updates (e.g., bash, systemd, journald) with the same prominence as PowerShell upgrades.
Provide parity in CLI and scripting examples for both platforms, including shell and package manager commands for Linux.
Document Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and GUI tools (where available) to match Windows coverage.
Where Windows-only features are described (e.g., cert store integration), clarify Linux alternatives or explicitly state platform limitations.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Arc gateway endpoint list ...in/articles/azure-arc/servers/arc-gateway-endpoints.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page lists a large number of endpoints related to Azure Arc gateway, with a noticeable emphasis on Windows-centric services and domains (e.g., windowsupdate.com, powershellgallery.com, windows.net, wustat.windows.com, etc.). There are no Linux-specific endpoints or examples, and the only explicit mention of Linux is in a single endpoint (linuxgeneva-microsoft.azurecr.io), which is not explained or contextualized. The documentation does not provide parity or guidance for Linux environments, nor does it mention Linux tools or patterns.

Recommendations

Add explicit guidance or examples for Linux environments, such as endpoint requirements for Arc-enabled Linux servers.
Include Linux-specific endpoints if applicable, or clarify which endpoints are relevant for Linux versus Windows.
Balance the documentation by mentioning Linux tools, patterns, or configuration steps alongside Windows equivalents.
Provide context for endpoints that are platform-specific, helping administrators understand which are needed for Windows, Linux, or both.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc CLI reference for `azcmagent check` ...lob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/azcmagent-check.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page for `azcmagent check` demonstrates Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific use cases (Windows Server Pay-as-you-go) in the flag descriptions, mentioning Windows scenarios before any Linux equivalents, and omitting explicit Linux examples or references. No Linux-specific flags, scenarios, or troubleshooting steps are provided, and the only extended use case mentioned is for Windows Server.

Recommendations

Add Linux-specific examples, such as checking connectivity for Linux extensions or scenarios (e.g., SQL Server on Linux, Linux Arc-enabled servers).
Include references to Linux documentation or troubleshooting guides alongside Windows references.
Mention Linux equivalents for any Windows-specific flags or use cases, or clarify if they are not applicable.
Ensure parity in extended use case descriptions by including common Linux scenarios (e.g., Linux server onboarding, Linux extension checks).
Review and update flag descriptions to avoid Windows-first language and provide balanced coverage for both platforms.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc CLI reference for `azcmagent connect` ...b/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/azcmagent-connect.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates Windows bias by listing Windows authentication methods first, referencing Windows-specific behaviors (such as interactive browser login being 'Windows only'), and mentioning PowerShell tools (Get-AzAccessToken) for access token retrieval without providing Linux equivalents. There are no explicit Linux command examples or references to Linux-specific patterns, and the examples do not clarify cross-platform differences.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux examples, such as shell commands for retrieving access tokens (e.g., using Azure CLI: az account get-access-token).
List authentication options in a neutral or platform-agnostic order, or alternate which platform is mentioned first.
Clarify cross-platform behaviors for all authentication methods, including any differences in user experience or prerequisites on Linux.
Reference Linux tools and patterns alongside Windows tools (e.g., mention az CLI for access tokens, not just PowerShell).
Add notes or examples for Linux-specific environments (such as systemd services, shell scripting, or headless server scenarios).

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Cloud-native monitoring and alerts with Azure Arc-enabled servers ...icles/azure-arc/servers/cloud-native/monitor-alerts.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-centric tools (System Center Operations Manager) and mentioning Windows Event logs before Linux syslog when discussing log collection. There are no concrete examples or instructions specific to Linux systems, and the language and tool references are more familiar to Windows administrators. Linux equivalents and examples are either mentioned secondarily or omitted.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux-focused examples, such as how to deploy the Azure Monitor Agent on Linux servers, including relevant commands and configuration steps.
Mention Linux syslog before or alongside Windows Event logs to avoid prioritizing Windows terminology.
Reference popular Linux monitoring tools (e.g., Nagios, Prometheus) when discussing migration from on-premises solutions, not just SCOM.
Include sample log queries and troubleshooting steps for Linux-specific scenarios.
Ensure parity in screenshots, command-line instructions, and agent deployment guides for both Windows and Linux environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Billing service for Extended Security Updates for Windows Server 2012 through Azure Arc ...azure-arc/servers/billing-extended-security-updates.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation is heavily focused on Windows Server 2012 and its Extended Security Updates (ESUs) via Azure Arc, with no mention of Linux systems, Linux equivalents, or cross-platform scenarios. All examples, terminology, and processes are specific to Windows environments, and Windows-specific tools and licensing models are referenced exclusively.

Recommendations

Include information on how billing and ESU management differ (or do not apply) for Linux servers managed via Azure Arc, if relevant.
Add examples or notes for Linux environments, even if only to clarify that ESUs are not applicable, or to describe analogous lifecycle management and billing processes for Linux workloads.
Reference Azure Arc's cross-platform capabilities and clarify which features are Windows-only and which are available for Linux.
If there are Linux equivalents for migration, modernization, or billing scenarios, provide links or documentation for those workflows.
Avoid using Windows-specific terminology (e.g., MAKs, Datacenter/Standard editions) without noting their scope or lack of applicability to Linux.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Identity and access management with Azure Arc-enabled servers ...cles/azure-arc/servers/cloud-native/identity-access.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-centric identity management concepts (Active Directory, Group Policy, LAPS) first and in detail, while Linux equivalents are mentioned only briefly or not at all. Examples and scenarios focus on Windows tools and patterns, such as Remote Desktop and AD domain join, with limited coverage of Linux access (SSH is mentioned only once, with no Linux-specific management examples). There is a lack of parity in describing Linux identity management practices or tools in hybrid environments.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-specific examples for identity and access management, such as using SSH with Microsoft Entra ID, managing sudoers via cloud policy, or integrating Linux PAM with Entra.
Include Linux-focused scenarios alongside Windows ones, such as onboarding Linux servers to Azure Arc and assigning roles for Linux management tasks.
Mention Linux-native tools and patterns (e.g., SELinux, systemd, local user management) where Windows tools like Group Policy and LAPS are discussed.
Ensure that examples and guidance are presented for both Windows and Linux platforms, ideally in parallel, to avoid platform-first bias.
Clarify how hybrid identity solutions work for Linux servers, including any limitations or best practices.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Deliver Extended Security Updates for Windows Server 2012 ...azure-arc/servers/deliver-extended-security-updates.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation is heavily focused on Windows Server 2012 and its management within Azure Arc, with all examples, screenshots, and workflows centered on Windows environments. There are no Linux equivalents or examples provided, and only Windows-specific tools and patching solutions are mentioned. The documentation assumes the reader is managing Windows servers exclusively, omitting any guidance for Linux systems or cross-platform scenarios.

Recommendations

Add explicit statements clarifying that the ESU process described is only applicable to Windows Server, and provide links or references for Linux security update management in Azure Arc if relevant.
Include examples or sections for managing security updates on Linux servers onboarded to Azure Arc, or clarify the differences in process and tooling.
Mention Linux-compatible patch management solutions (such as Azure Update Manager for Linux, or third-party tools) alongside Windows-specific ones, and provide parity in documentation structure.
If Azure Arc supports Linux servers for other update scenarios, provide cross-platform comparison tables or workflows to help administrators manage both Windows and Linux environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Deploy Azure Monitor agent on Arc-enabled servers ...es/azure-arc/servers/azure-monitor-agent-deployment.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page describes deployment methods for the Azure Monitor agent on Arc-enabled servers, mentioning both Windows and Linux support in the introduction. However, throughout the article, examples and tooling references (such as PowerShell, Azure CLI, and ARM templates) are presented without explicit Linux-specific guidance or parity. PowerShell is repeatedly referenced as a primary automation tool, and there are no concrete Linux shell (bash) or Linux-native tool examples. The documentation lacks explicit Linux command-line examples and does not mention Linux package managers or Linux-specific deployment nuances.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for deploying the agent, alongside PowerShell examples.
Include references to Linux-native tools (such as cloud-init, Ansible, or shell scripts) for automation, not just PowerShell and Python.
Clarify any Linux-specific steps or considerations, such as permissions, package dependencies, or service management.
Ensure that tooling references (CLI, templates) include both Windows and Linux usage patterns, with examples for each.
Consider reordering or balancing examples so that Linux and Windows are presented with equal prominence.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Cloud-native governance and policy with Azure Arc-enabled servers ...es/azure-arc/servers/cloud-native/governance-policy.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently referencing Windows-centric tools (Active Directory Group Policy, RSoP, gpresult), providing examples and built-in policies focused on Windows settings (e.g., Windows Firewall, password complexity), and mapping Azure Policy initiatives to Windows security baselines. There are no explicit examples or mentions of Linux-specific settings, tools, or parity in policy enforcement, and the discussion of policy management is framed primarily around Windows server administration patterns.

Recommendations

Include explicit examples of Azure Policy auditing and enforcement for Linux servers, such as checking SSH configuration, auditing sudoers file, or ensuring specific Linux services are running.
Mention Linux equivalents to Windows tools (e.g., referencing Linux configuration management tools, auditd, or policy reporting commands) when discussing compliance reporting.
Provide built-in policy examples for common Linux scenarios (e.g., password policy enforcement via /etc/login.defs, firewall status via ufw or firewalld).
Clarify how Azure Policy interacts with Linux servers, including any differences in agent behavior, supported settings, or limitations compared to Windows.
Balance the discussion by describing hybrid environments that include both Windows and Linux servers, and how Azure Policy supports governance across both platforms.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Cloud-native inventory and resource organization with Azure Arc-enabled servers ...s/azure-arc/servers/cloud-native/inventory-resource.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-centric tools and concepts (Active Directory, SCCM, Group Policy Objects) as primary analogies for Azure resource organization. Examples and comparisons are consistently drawn from Windows environments, with no mention of Linux equivalents (such as LDAP, Ansible, or Linux-native inventory/grouping tools). There are no Linux-specific examples or references to Linux administrative patterns, and the only OS-specific query example given is for Windows Server 2012.

Recommendations

Include analogies and comparisons to Linux-native organizational tools (e.g., LDAP, systemd groups, Ansible inventory, etc.) alongside Active Directory and SCCM.
Provide example queries and inventory scenarios for Linux servers (e.g., finding all Ubuntu servers, tracking package changes on Linux, etc.).
Mention Linux administrative patterns and tools when discussing resource grouping and inventory (such as using tags to mimic Ansible groups or Puppet node classifications).
Ensure that OS-specific examples (such as Azure Resource Graph queries) include both Windows and Linux server scenarios.
Clarify that Azure Arc supports both Windows and Linux servers, and provide guidance or links for Linux-specific onboarding and management.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Cloud-native licensing and cost management with Azure Arc-enabled servers ...-arc/servers/cloud-native/licensing-cost-management.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page focuses exclusively on Windows Server and SQL Server licensing and management via Azure Arc, with all examples, scenarios, and tools centered around Windows environments. There are no references to Linux server licensing, Linux equivalents, or cross-platform considerations. Azure Update Manager and other tools are described only in the context of Windows, and the narrative assumes Windows as the default operating system for hybrid cloud licensing.

Recommendations

Add sections or examples describing how Azure Arc licensing and cost management applies to Linux servers, including any differences or similarities in licensing models.
Include Linux-specific tools and workflows for patching and compliance, such as integration with native Linux package managers (e.g., apt, yum, zypper) and how Azure Arc interacts with them.
Provide parity in documentation by mentioning Linux scenarios alongside Windows ones, especially in introductory and summary sections.
Clarify whether pay-as-you-go or ESU models are available for Linux workloads, and if not, explicitly state the scope of current support.
Offer guidance for administrators managing mixed Windows and Linux environments, including best practices for cost management, compliance, and reporting across platforms.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Next steps for cloud-native server management with Azure Arc-enabled servers .../articles/azure-arc/servers/cloud-native/next-steps.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing Windows-specific tools (Windows Admin Center, Configuration Manager, WSUS, GPO) as onboarding and management options, often without mentioning Linux equivalents or providing Linux-specific examples. Windows management patterns are discussed first and in detail, while Linux onboarding and management approaches are not described. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform CLI examples, and automation references do not mention Linux scripting or tools.

Recommendations

Add explicit onboarding instructions and examples for Linux servers, such as using shell scripts, cloud-init, or Ansible for agent installation.
Include references to Linux-native management tools (e.g., cron for automation, Linux patching workflows) and how they integrate with Azure Arc.
Provide cross-platform CLI examples (Azure CLI, shell scripts) for common tasks, and clarify which steps apply to both Windows and Linux.
Mention Linux equivalents for Windows tools (e.g., instead of only GPO, discuss Linux configuration management with Azure machine configuration or Ansible).
Ensure that documentation sections do not prioritize Windows tools and patterns over Linux; present both platforms equally or in parallel.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc How to evaluate Azure Arc-enabled servers with an Azure virtual machine ...-arc/servers/plan-evaluate-on-azure-virtual-machine.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation demonstrates mild Windows bias: Windows examples and tools (PowerShell, Windows Guest Agent, Windows firewall) are consistently presented before their Linux equivalents. Windows-specific instructions (e.g., using PowerShell for environment variables and firewall rules) are detailed, while Linux instructions are more fragmented and require consulting external documentation for some distributions. The initial VM deployment links also list Windows before Linux, and the Windows VM creation link is correct while the Ubuntu link appears to be a copy-paste error (points to Windows template).

Recommendations

Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, or alternate which comes first in each section.
Ensure Linux examples are as detailed and self-contained as Windows examples (e.g., provide explicit commands for all major distributions, not just refer to external docs).
Correct the Ubuntu VM deployment link to point to the actual Ubuntu template.
Where possible, use cross-platform tools or note platform differences explicitly.
Add troubleshooting tips specific to Linux distributions, matching the depth provided for Windows.
Review all examples and ensure Linux parity in clarity, completeness, and order of presentation.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Authenticate against Azure resources with Azure Arc-enabled servers ...s/azure-arc/servers/managed-identity-authentication.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows and PowerShell are frequently mentioned first, and PowerShell is the only scripting tool referenced by name for access policy assignment. The Windows example is presented before the Linux example, and the image for PowerShell output appears before the Bash output. References to Windows-specific tools (e.g., IIS) are made without equivalent Linux examples. Some linked tutorials and next steps prioritize PowerShell over Azure CLI, and Linux instructions are sometimes less detailed or presented as secondary.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux examples throughout the documentation to avoid consistently prioritizing Windows.
Provide equal detail and prominence for Linux/Bash and Azure CLI instructions, including direct links to CLI-based tutorials for access policy assignment.
Mention Linux equivalents for Windows-specific tools (e.g., reference Apache or Nginx alongside IIS for certificate deployment).
Ensure that images and code samples for Linux are as visible and detailed as those for Windows.
Where PowerShell is referenced, also mention Bash/CLI alternatives in the same context.
Review and update prerequisite and next steps sections to give equal weight to Linux and CLI-based workflows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Troubleshoot Azure Arc-enabled servers in disconnected scenarios ...rticles/azure-arc/servers/troubleshoot-connectivity.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by exclusively mentioning Windows-specific tools (Windows Admin Center, Configuration Manager) as contingency options for disconnected servers, without referencing equivalent Linux tools or management patterns. No Linux-specific examples or recommendations are provided, and Windows tools are presented first and exclusively, implying primary support for Windows environments.

Recommendations

Include Linux-native management tools (e.g., Cockpit, Ansible, SSH, systemd utilities) as contingency options for disconnected servers.
Provide examples or guidance for troubleshooting and managing Azure Arc-enabled servers on Linux systems.
Ensure parity in documentation by listing both Windows and Linux tools/patterns, or presenting them in a neutral order.
Add notes or sections that address Linux-specific behaviors and considerations for disconnected scenarios.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc How to migrate from legacy Log Analytics agents in non-Azure environments with Azure Arc ...in/articles/azure-arc/servers/migrate-legacy-agents.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page exhibits a moderate Windows bias. Windows-specific tools (Windows Admin Center, Windows Server Graphical Installer, Group Policy) are mentioned explicitly and before Linux equivalents. PowerShell is referenced as a deployment method, but Bash is only mentioned in passing, with no Linux-specific examples or tools (e.g., systemd, Linux package managers, or shell commands) provided. The 'Standalone Azure Monitor Agent installation' section is exclusively for Windows client machines, with no mention of Linux client options. There are no concrete Linux deployment examples or references to Linux management tools.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux deployment examples, such as Bash scripts, shell commands, or references to Linux package managers (apt, yum, zypper) for agent installation.
Mention and provide guidance for Linux management tools (e.g., Ansible, systemd service setup) alongside Windows tools.
Include a section for standalone Azure Monitor Agent installation on Linux client machines, if supported, or clarify its availability.
Ensure that deployment instructions and tool references are presented in a platform-neutral order, or provide parallel instructions for both Windows and Linux.
Reference Linux-specific documentation links where appropriate, especially in sections discussing prerequisites and deployment.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Troubleshoot Azure Arc-enabled servers VM extension issues ...ticles/azure-arc/servers/troubleshoot-vm-extensions.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for extension removal, listing Windows file paths and log locations before Linux equivalents, and referencing Windows-specific tools and patterns (such as PowerShell and C: drive locations) more prominently. Linux instructions and CLI examples are present but less emphasized and appear after Windows instructions.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Linux command-line examples (e.g., Bash/CLI) alongside or before PowerShell examples.
Alternate the order of Windows and Linux instructions to avoid consistently listing Windows first.
Include more details on Linux troubleshooting steps, such as common Linux-specific issues and commands.
Reference cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI) in examples and troubleshooting steps, not just PowerShell.
Ensure parity in log file path explanations and troubleshooting guidance for both operating systems.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Connected Machine Agent Deployment Options .../main/articles/azure-arc/servers/deployment-options.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page lists deployment options for both Linux and Windows, but Windows-specific tools and methods (PowerShell, Windows Admin Center, Configuration Manager, Group Policy) are given dedicated entries and examples, while Linux-specific automation tools (e.g., Ansible) are mentioned only once and not in as much detail. PowerShell is highlighted as a cross-platform method, but there is no equivalent emphasis on Bash or shell scripting for Linux. Windows tools are described in detail and appear before Linux alternatives, and some onboarding methods are exclusive to Windows without Linux equivalents.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux-first onboarding examples, such as Bash scripts or shell commands, alongside PowerShell examples.
Provide Linux-specific automation methods (e.g., using cloud-init, systemd, or native package managers) with equal detail as Windows tools.
Ensure that Linux tools and patterns (e.g., Ansible, SSH, shell scripting) are mentioned before or alongside Windows tools in summary tables and descriptions.
Include dedicated Linux onboarding scenarios, such as onboarding from Linux management platforms (e.g., Red Hat Satellite, SUSE Manager), if applicable.
Balance the documentation by giving Linux and Windows parity in example scripts, tool recommendations, and step-by-step guides.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc License provisioning guidelines for Extended Security Updates for Windows Server 2012 ...azure-arc/servers/license-extended-security-updates.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation is heavily focused on Windows Server 2012 environments and licensing, with all examples, scenarios, and guidance centered on Windows Server hosts and VMs. There are no examples or guidance for Linux servers, nor are Linux tools or patterns mentioned. The use of Azure Arc is described only in the context of managing Windows Server ESUs, and all sample scenarios exclusively reference Windows Server deployments, including on third-party clouds. Windows terminology and licensing models are used throughout, with no mention of Linux equivalents or how Linux systems might interact with Azure Arc in similar scenarios.

Recommendations

Add parallel examples for Linux servers, such as how to provision licenses or manage security updates for Linux VMs via Azure Arc.
Include references to Linux licensing or support models where relevant, or clarify if/why ESU licensing is not applicable to Linux.
Mention Linux tools and management patterns (e.g., Bash, SSH, Linux-native Azure Arc agents) alongside Windows/Powershell equivalents.
Provide guidance for hybrid environments where both Windows and Linux servers are managed through Azure Arc, including best practices for parity.
Clarify in the introduction that the guidance is Windows-specific, and link to Linux-focused Azure Arc documentation if available.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc What's new in Azure Arc-enabled VMware vSphere ...ob/main/articles/azure-arc/vmware-vsphere/whats-new.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page exhibits a moderate Windows bias. Windows-specific features (such as customizing guest OS settings for Windows VMs and Windows Server Management) are highlighted, and Windows tools (System Center Configuration Manager, Group Policy, PowerShell) are mentioned for agent installation before Linux equivalents. Linux-specific examples and tools are less visible or only briefly referenced (e.g., SSH-based agent installation), and there is a lack of parity in detailed Linux management features or examples.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Linux-focused examples and features, such as customizing guest OS settings for Linux VMs.
Mention Linux tools (e.g., cloud-init, Ansible, shell scripts) alongside or before Windows tools when discussing at-scale agent installation.
Ensure parity in management features for both Windows and Linux VMs, and document exclusive capabilities for Linux where applicable.
Add explicit Linux examples for agent installation, lifecycle management, and security updates.
Balance references to PowerShell with Bash/CLI examples for cross-platform clarity.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Plan for deployment ...phere/support-matrix-for-arc-enabled-vmware-vsphere.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation displays a Windows bias by listing Windows requirements and tools (such as .NET Framework and PowerShell) before Linux equivalents, referencing Windows-specific download links, and mentioning Windows Admin Center and PowerShell explicitly. There are no Linux command examples or detailed Linux tool requirements beyond a brief mention of systemd and wget. Windows tooling is described in more detail and with direct download links, while Linux requirements are minimal and lack parity in guidance.

Recommendations

Provide Linux installation examples and commands (e.g., bash scripts, package manager instructions) alongside Windows/PowerShell examples.
List Linux requirements with equal detail, including supported distributions, required packages, and troubleshooting steps.
Include direct links to Linux installation guides and resources, similar to those provided for Windows.
Mention Linux tools and patterns (e.g., SSH, systemd service management) with the same prominence as Windows tools.
Ensure that networking requirements and scenarios are described for both Windows and Linux environments, including Linux-specific use cases.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Upgrade the Azure Arc resource bridge ...l-machine-manager/upgrade-azure-arc-resource-bridge.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation is heavily oriented toward Windows environments, specifically SCVMM (System Center Virtual Machine Manager), and assumes the use of Windows servers and workstations. All examples and instructions reference Windows tools and workflows, such as VHDX files, SCVMM servers, and do not mention or provide Linux equivalents or cross-platform alternatives. There are no Linux-specific instructions or examples, and the upgrade process is described solely in the context of Windows infrastructure.

Recommendations

Include explicit guidance for Linux environments, such as how to perform upgrades from Linux workstations if supported.
Provide examples using Linux-compatible tools and formats (e.g., mention VHD rather than only VHDX, or clarify cross-platform support).
Clarify whether the az arcappliance CLI and upgrade process can be run from Linux or macOS, and provide instructions if so.
Add troubleshooting steps and prerequisites relevant to Linux systems (e.g., file permissions, storage locations, etc.).
If the resource bridge is Windows-only by design, clearly state this limitation early in the documentation.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: "As a network administrator, I want to configure secure outbound connectivity for the Azure Connected Machine agent so that I can ensure proper communication with Azure Arc while adhering to my organization's security policies." ...les/azure-arc/servers/includes/network-requirements.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page exhibits several signs of Windows bias. Windows-specific tools and terminology (e.g., Windows Admin Center, Windows installation package, Windows TLS configuration issues) are mentioned before or more prominently than their Linux equivalents. The cryptographic protocol section provides detailed information and troubleshooting links for Windows, while Linux guidance is limited to referencing OpenSSL. There are no Linux-specific configuration or troubleshooting examples, and Windows scenarios (such as hotpatching, pay-as-you-go billing, and TLS registry settings) are described in detail, whereas Linux scenarios are not. Windows-related endpoints and features are listed before Linux ones in tables and descriptions.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-specific configuration and troubleshooting examples, such as how to verify TLS settings using OpenSSL or update cipher suites.
Include parity in endpoint tables, such as listing Linux installation and update URLs before or alongside Windows equivalents.
Add references to Linux management tools (e.g., Cockpit, Ansible) where Windows Admin Center is mentioned.
Offer detailed guidance for Linux-specific scenarios (e.g., SELinux, iptables/firewalld configuration for outbound connectivity).
Ensure troubleshooting links and sections are available for Linux, not just Windows.
Balance the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows are treated equally in examples and explanations.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Automatic extension upgrade for Azure Arc-enabled servers ...e-arc/servers/manage-automatic-vm-extension-upgrade.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page provides guidance for both Windows and Linux Azure Arc-enabled servers, but there is a noticeable Windows bias. Windows-specific tools (Azure PowerShell) are given equal prominence to cross-platform tools (Azure CLI), and PowerShell examples are included alongside CLI examples. Windows-only extensions are listed explicitly, while Linux-only extensions are not. The ordering of tools and examples often places Windows-centric options (PowerShell) before or alongside cross-platform or Linux-native options, and there is no explicit Linux shell example (e.g., bash script) beyond generic CLI usage.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux shell (bash/zsh) examples for common operations, especially in the CLI section.
List any Linux-only extensions if applicable, to balance the explicit mention of Windows-only extensions.
Consider reordering tool guidance to present cross-platform options (Azure CLI) before Windows-centric ones (PowerShell).
Clarify that Azure CLI commands work natively in Linux environments and provide sample usage in a Linux shell context.
Where PowerShell is mentioned, also mention Linux-native scripting alternatives if available.
Ensure screenshots and UI references do not assume a Windows environment unless necessary.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Enable VM Extensions Using Azure Resource Manager Template ...les/azure-arc/servers/manage-vm-extensions-template.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias primarily through exclusive use of PowerShell for deployment commands, with no equivalent Azure CLI or Bash examples for Linux users. All command-line instructions are shown in PowerShell syntax, and file paths use Windows-style formatting (e.g., 'D:\Azure\Templates\...'). While ARM template JSON examples are provided for both Linux and Windows extensions, the operational instructions and deployment workflow are centered around Windows tooling and patterns. There is no demonstration of Linux-native workflows or cross-platform command-line parity.

Recommendations

Add equivalent Azure CLI examples for deploying ARM templates, especially for Linux users.
Include Bash shell command examples for template deployment, using Linux-style file paths.
Present deployment commands for both Windows and Linux side-by-side, or in separate sections, to avoid Windows-first ordering.
Explicitly mention cross-platform tooling options and clarify which commands are suitable for Linux environments.
Ensure that references to file paths and environment variables include both Windows and Linux formats.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Manage and maintain the Azure Connected Machine agent ...s/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/manage-agent.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation generally maintains parity between Windows and Linux by providing separate, detailed instructions for both platforms. However, there is evidence of Windows bias: Windows instructions and tools (such as PowerShell, Group Policy, Microsoft Update, and Control Panel) are often presented first or in greater detail, and Windows-specific management patterns (like WSUS, Configuration Manager, and MSI installer options) are described extensively. PowerShell examples are frequently included, while equivalent Linux scripting or automation examples are missing. Windows-centric terminology and workflows (e.g., registry editing, Group Policy) are covered in depth, whereas Linux alternatives (such as systemd, package manager hooks, or shell scripting) are not discussed.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux sections to avoid consistently presenting Windows first.
Provide Linux automation examples (e.g., Bash scripts for upgrades/uninstalls, systemd unit file management) where PowerShell scripts are given for Windows.
Include Linux equivalents for Windows-specific management tools (e.g., describe how to automate agent upgrades/removal using Ansible, Chef, or shell scripts).
Expand Linux troubleshooting and logging guidance to match the depth of Windows instructions (e.g., mention relevant log files, systemctl commands, etc.).
Reference Linux configuration management and update infrastructure (e.g., unattended-upgrades, dnf-automatic, zypper services) alongside Windows Update/WSUS.
Where registry or Group Policy is discussed for Windows, mention Linux configuration file or environment variable management approaches.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Enable VM Extensions Using the Azure CLI (Windows and Linux) ...articles/azure-arc/servers/manage-vm-extensions-cli.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways. Most code examples for enabling and updating extensions use Windows-specific tools and commands (e.g., powershell.exe in Custom Script Extension settings). Extension types and examples (Antimalware, DatadogWindowsAgent, DependencyAgentWindows) are predominantly Windows-focused, with little or no explicit Linux equivalent shown. Linux-specific extension types (e.g., KeyVaultForLinux) are mentioned only as alternatives, not demonstrated. There are no examples showing Linux shell commands or scripts, nor are Linux-specific extension settings or patterns illustrated.

Recommendations

Provide parallel Linux examples for each extension operation, using bash/sh commands in Custom Script Extension settings.
Show how to enable Linux-specific extensions (e.g., DependencyAgentLinux, DatadogLinuxAgent) with full example commands.
Balance extension examples to include both Windows and Linux scenarios, with clear indication of OS applicability.
When showing Custom Script Extension, alternate between powershell.exe and bash/sh scripts in the 'commandToExecute' parameter.
Add notes or tables summarizing which extensions are available for Windows, Linux, or both, and link to relevant documentation.
Ensure troubleshooting and related content includes Linux-specific guidance and references.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc VM Extension Management with Azure Arc-Enabled Servers ...ain/articles/azure-arc/servers/manage-vm-extensions.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_heavy_examples

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: Windows extensions are listed and described before Linux extensions, the Windows table is significantly longer and more detailed, and several Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., Windows Admin Center, PowerShell, Windows Patch extension) are highlighted. There are more Windows-only extensions and features described, and Windows tools are mentioned explicitly, while Linux equivalents are less emphasized or missing. The deployment methods list Azure PowerShell (Windows-centric) before CLI, and Windows Admin Center is featured as a management tool without a Linux counterpart.

Recommendations

Present Windows and Linux extension tables in parallel or interleaved, rather than listing Windows first and in more detail.
Ensure parity in extension descriptions and examples for Linux, including more Linux-specific extensions and management tools.
Highlight Linux management tools (such as Cockpit, Ansible, or native SSH) where appropriate, similar to the mention of Windows Admin Center.
Provide Linux-first or cross-platform examples for extension deployment, and avoid listing Windows-centric tools (e.g., PowerShell) before cross-platform alternatives (e.g., Azure CLI).
Expand documentation to include Linux-specific automation and configuration scenarios, ensuring equal coverage for both platforms.

Create Pull Request

Azure Portal Create an Azure portal dashboard by using an Azure Resource Manager template ...ob/main/articles/azure-portal/quick-create-template.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All example commands for creating the required VM use PowerShell and Windows-centric resource group/VM naming ('SimpleWinVmResourceGroup', 'myVM1'). There are no Linux or Bash examples for VM creation, nor are Linux VM options mentioned. Username/password requirements link only to Windows VM documentation. The instructions and screenshots focus exclusively on Windows tools and patterns, with no parity for Linux users.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Bash/Azure CLI examples for VM creation in Cloud Shell, including Linux VM creation steps.
Include links to Linux VM username/password requirements and documentation.
Use more neutral resource group and VM names (e.g., 'SimpleVmResourceGroup', 'myVM1' or 'myLinuxVM1').
Add a note or section explaining how to perform all steps using Linux tools and workflows.
Ensure screenshots and instructions reflect both PowerShell and Bash options in Cloud Shell.

Create Pull Request

Azure Portal How to create an Azure support request .../supportability/how-to-create-azure-support-request.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily in the 'Memory dump collection' section, which exclusively describes Windows memory dump formats and Hyper-V save state mechanisms, without mentioning Linux VM equivalents. Additionally, the advanced diagnostic logs section links to Windows VM logs first and does not provide parity for Linux VM troubleshooting. There are no CLI or shell examples for Linux users, and the documentation does not mention Linux-specific support scenarios or tools.

Recommendations

Include information about memory dump collection for Linux VMs, such as how Linux crash dumps are handled and what diagnostic data is collected.
Add links to Linux VM troubleshooting guides and diagnostic log collection procedures alongside Windows examples.
Ensure that references to VM logs and support data collection cover both Windows and Linux environments equally.
Provide CLI or shell command examples for creating and managing support requests, demonstrating usage on both Windows and Linux platforms.
Explicitly mention any differences in support request handling or diagnostic data collection between Windows and Linux VMs.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Service Principal Authentication for ACR ...-registry/container-registry-auth-service-principal.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page references both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell sample scripts, but lists PowerShell examples and links alongside CLI examples, suggesting parity. However, there is a subtle Windows bias: PowerShell is mentioned explicitly and linked, while Linux-specific shell scripting is not discussed beyond the Azure CLI. No Linux-specific tools or patterns (such as bash scripting, environment variable conventions, or package manager instructions) are provided, and Windows/PowerShell is given equal or slightly more prominence than Linux. There are no examples of using Linux-native credential managers or automation tools. The only explicit command-line example uses bash-style environment variables, which is cross-platform but not specifically Linux-oriented.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux shell script examples, such as bash scripts for service principal creation and authentication.
Include instructions or examples for Linux credential management (e.g., using keyring, secrets, or environment files).
Clarify cross-platform compatibility for all commands and scripts, noting any OS-specific differences.
Provide parity in example links: if PowerShell scripts are linked, also link to bash or shell script repositories.
Mention Linux automation tools (e.g., cron, systemd) in relevant scenarios alongside Windows equivalents.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc How to modernize server management from Configuration Manager to Azure Arc ...icles/azure-arc/servers/modernize-server-management.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. While it mentions Linux support and parity as a benefit of Azure Arc, examples and onboarding guidance are primarily Windows-centric. Windows-specific tools and licensing (Scheduled Task, Windows Server Software Assurance) are referenced, and onboarding instructions focus on Windows scenarios. There are no explicit Linux onboarding examples, nor are Linux-native tools or patterns (e.g., systemd, cron) mentioned. The functional mapping and feature descriptions generally treat Windows as the default, with Linux support noted as an enhancement rather than a core scenario.

Recommendations

Add explicit onboarding instructions and examples for Linux servers, including use of Linux-native tools (e.g., systemd timers, cron jobs) for agent installation and management.
Provide Linux-specific examples in sections describing functionality (e.g., patching, configuration, reporting), such as referencing Linux package managers, configuration files, and security tools.
Balance references to Windows licensing and tools with equivalent Linux scenarios (e.g., mention Linux support contracts or open-source alternatives).
Ensure that all feature descriptions and guidance highlight Linux support as a first-class scenario, not just as an add-on.
Include screenshots or command-line examples for both Windows (PowerShell, Scheduled Task) and Linux (bash, systemd, cron) where relevant.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Connect machines at scale with a Configuration Manager custom task sequence ...c/servers/onboard-configuration-manager-custom-task.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All examples and instructions are exclusively for Windows environments, specifically using Microsoft Configuration Manager and Windows Installer (.msi) packages. The agent download and installation steps reference only the Windows version, and all automation is shown via PowerShell scripts. There is no mention of Linux equivalents, Linux agent packages, or cross-platform deployment strategies. The use of Windows-specific tools and patterns (Configuration Manager, PowerShell, .msi) is pervasive throughout the guide.

Recommendations

Add parallel instructions and examples for Linux environments, including how to deploy the Connected Machine Agent on Linux servers at scale.
Reference and provide download links for the Linux agent package (typically .deb or .rpm) alongside the Windows .msi.
Include sample task sequences or automation scripts using Bash or other Linux-native tools (e.g., shell scripts, Ansible, or cloud-init).
Describe how to use cross-platform deployment tools (such as Ansible, Puppet, or Azure Automation) for onboarding Linux machines.
Explicitly state platform support and clarify any differences in process or tooling between Windows and Linux.
Provide troubleshooting and verification steps for Linux machines, not just Windows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Connect hybrid machines to Azure at scale ...rticles/azure-arc/servers/onboard-service-principal.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page exhibits several instances of Windows bias. Windows and PowerShell tools are mentioned first or exclusively in multiple sections, such as the creation of service principals and script generation. PowerShell examples are provided in detail, while Linux equivalents (e.g., Bash, shell commands) are less emphasized or missing. Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., .ps1 scripts, PowerShell requirements) are highlighted, and Linux instructions are often referenced only as alternatives, not as primary examples.

Recommendations

Ensure Linux/Bash examples are provided alongside PowerShell, with equal detail and prominence.
Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, rather than listing Windows first.
Explicitly mention Linux tools and automation patterns (e.g., Bash scripting, Ansible) where PowerShell is discussed.
Include screenshots or walkthroughs for Linux onboarding, not just Windows/PowerShell.
Clarify any platform-specific limitations or requirements for both Windows and Linux.
Review and update output examples to show both .ps1 and .sh script results.
Avoid language that implies Windows is the default or preferred platform.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Connect hybrid machines to Azure using a deployment script ...blob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/onboard-portal.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page presents Windows installation instructions before Linux, provides more detailed Windows examples (including PowerShell commands and references to Windows Installer tools), and uses Windows-specific tooling and terminology (e.g., msiexec, PowerShell, Windows Installer package). Linux instructions are present and reasonably detailed, but Windows patterns and tools are introduced first and with more depth, indicating a Windows-first and Windows-tooling bias.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux sections, or present both in parallel where possible.
Provide equally detailed Linux examples, including troubleshooting steps, log locations, and command-line options.
Reference Linux package management tools (e.g., apt, yum, rpm) and shell scripting patterns where appropriate.
Avoid assuming PowerShell or Windows Installer familiarity; provide equivalent Linux context (e.g., systemctl for service management, environment variable configuration via shell).
Ensure that links to further documentation and troubleshooting guides are equally available for Linux users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Connect machines from Azure Automation Update Management ...zure-arc/servers/onboard-update-management-machines.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page describes onboarding both Windows and Linux machines to Azure Arc via Automation Update Management, but the examples and tooling references are Windows-centric. The runbook names use 'Add-UMMachinesToArcWindowsChild' and 'Add-UMMachinesToArcLinuxChild', but all references to viewing job status and logs mention Azure PowerShell and the Azure portal, with no mention of Linux-native tools or CLI usage. There are no explicit Linux command examples, and the troubleshooting and verification steps rely on graphical interfaces or Windows-oriented tools.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux command-line examples for onboarding and verification, such as using Bash or shell scripts.
Mention Linux-native tools (e.g., journalctl, systemctl) for troubleshooting agent installation and connectivity.
Include instructions for viewing job status and logs using Azure CLI on Linux, not just PowerShell or portal.
Balance references to Windows and Linux throughout the documentation, ensuring parity in examples and troubleshooting steps.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Plan and Deploy Azure Arc-Enabled Servers ...articles/azure-arc/servers/plan-at-scale-deployment.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: Windows and PowerShell tools are mentioned first or exclusively (e.g., service principal creation via Azure PowerShell), and there is a lack of explicit Linux command-line or automation examples. References to automation and onboarding scripts mention both Linux and Windows, but do not provide parity in examples or highlight Linux-specific tooling or patterns. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tools and does not provide equivalent Linux shell or automation guidance.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux shell (bash) and automation examples alongside PowerShell examples for all onboarding and management tasks.
Mention Linux-native tools (such as shell scripts, Ansible, or cloud-init) where automation is discussed, not just Windows/PowerShell.
Ensure that instructions for creating service principals and other Azure resources include CLI (az) and bash options, not only Azure PowerShell or portal.
Where sample scripts are referenced, include direct links to both Linux and Windows versions, and clarify any OS-specific steps.
Review all sections for implicit Windows-first ordering and alternate with Linux-first or neutral presentation.
Add troubleshooting and management guidance specific to Linux environments, including common issues and solutions.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc How to prepare to deliver Extended Security Updates for Windows Server 2012 through Azure Arc ...azure-arc/servers/prepare-extended-security-updates.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation is heavily focused on Windows Server 2012/2012 R2, with all examples, deployment options, and tooling references tailored to Windows environments (e.g., Group Policy, Configuration Manager, SCVMM). There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or mentions of Linux equivalents for onboarding, patching, or certificate management. Windows tools and patterns are referenced exclusively, and Linux scenarios are not addressed.

Recommendations

Add explicit guidance for onboarding Linux servers to Azure Arc, including supported distributions and prerequisites.
Provide Linux-specific deployment examples (e.g., using shell scripts, Ansible, or native Linux automation tools) alongside Windows methods.
Include instructions for managing certificates on Linux systems, such as using OpenSSL or system trust stores.
Clarify whether ESU delivery via Azure Arc is available for Linux servers, and if not, explicitly state the scope.
Where possible, mention cross-platform tools or approaches for hybrid environments, and avoid assuming Windows-only infrastructure.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Quickstart - Connect a machine to Arc-enabled servers (Windows or Linux install script) ...n/articles/azure-arc/servers/quick-enable-hybrid-vm.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows instructions (PowerShell usage) are presented before Linux instructions, and the Windows section explicitly references PowerShell as the required tool, while the Linux section is more generic. The documentation refers to Windows-specific tools (PowerShell, Local Administrators group) and patterns before their Linux equivalents, and the Windows agent installation steps are described first in the 'Install the agent by using the script' section.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux instructions, or present them side-by-side to avoid implicit prioritization.
Explicitly mention Linux tools (e.g., Bash, sudo) in the prerequisites and installation steps, similar to how PowerShell is referenced for Windows.
Provide parity in detail and troubleshooting steps for both platforms, ensuring Linux instructions are as comprehensive as Windows.
Include screenshots or command-line output examples for Linux, not just Windows.
Where possible, use neutral language and avoid assuming Windows as the default (e.g., avoid phrases like 'Open an elevated PowerShell prompt' without a Linux equivalent).

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc-enabled servers Overview ...-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page describes Azure Arc-enabled servers as supporting both Windows and Linux, but several sections and linked resources prioritize Windows tools and patterns. Examples include referencing PowerShell and Windows registry before Linux equivalents, linking to Windows-specific tabs in automation guides, and mentioning Windows features (registry, files) before Linux daemons. There are no explicit Linux command-line or tool examples, and Windows terminology is often used first or exclusively.

Recommendations

Ensure all examples and linked guides provide parity between Windows and Linux, including Bash and Linux command-line instructions where PowerShell is mentioned.
When listing supported features (e.g., configuration assessment), mention Linux equivalents (e.g., systemd services, config files) alongside Windows registry and files.
Avoid defaulting to Windows tabs or examples in linked documentation; provide equal visibility for Linux scenarios.
Include explicit Linux tool references and examples (e.g., shell scripts, Linux package managers) in configuration and automation sections.
Review terminology to avoid Windows-first phrasing; use 'Windows and Linux' or 'Linux and Windows' interchangeably.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Connected Machine agent prerequisites .../blob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/prerequisites.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows-specific instructions and tools (such as PowerShell scripts and Group Policy Editor) are presented in detail, often before or in greater depth than Linux equivalents. For example, installation script modifications for limited support OS are shown only for Windows (with PowerShell), while Linux is mentioned briefly without example. Windows tools like 'gpedit.msc' and Group Policy are described extensively, whereas Linux system management requirements are listed but not explained. Resource provider registration examples are given for both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI, but the PowerShell example appears first.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-specific installation script examples, especially for limited support scenarios, to match the detail given for Windows.
Include Linux system management equivalents for tasks like user rights assignment (e.g., systemd service configuration, user/group permissions).
Alternate the order of Windows and Linux instructions/examples to avoid consistently presenting Windows first.
Expand on Linux troubleshooting and configuration steps where Windows tools (like Group Policy Editor) are described in detail.
Ensure parity in examples and guidance for both platforms throughout the documentation.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Use Azure Private Link to Connect Servers to Azure Arc by Using a Private Endpoint ...in/articles/azure-arc/servers/private-link-security.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows terminology, tools, and examples are often presented first or exclusively, such as referencing Windows Admin Center, using Windows file paths in examples, and listing Windows agent download links before Linux equivalents. Linux instructions are present but less detailed, and there is a lack of parity in troubleshooting and configuration examples for Linux environments.

Recommendations

Ensure Linux instructions are given equal prominence and detail as Windows instructions, including explicit Linux agent download and installation steps.
Provide Linux-specific troubleshooting commands and examples, such as using dig or systemd-resolved for DNS checks.
Mention Linux tools (e.g., SSH, firewalld, iptables) alongside Windows tools (e.g., Windows Admin Center), and clarify which features are available or unsupported on each platform.
When listing steps for editing hosts files or configuring DNS, present Linux and Windows instructions side-by-side, rather than Windows first.
Include explicit references to Linux package managers (apt, yum, zypper) and agent installation commands.
Avoid using Windows-centric terminology (e.g., 'server' to mean Windows Server) when referring to cross-platform machines; use 'machine' or 'host' where appropriate.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure CLI Requests for the Run Command on Azure Arc-enabled Servers (Preview) ...lob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/run-command-cli.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively providing PowerShell script examples (e.g., 'Write-Host Hello World!') and omitting any Linux shell script (bash/sh) examples. The use of PowerShell syntax as the sole example implies a Windows-first approach, and there is no mention of Linux-specific patterns, tools, or script types. This may lead Linux users to believe the feature is primarily for Windows environments or that Linux is not fully supported.

Recommendations

Include Linux shell script examples (e.g., 'echo Hello World!') alongside PowerShell examples in all relevant command samples.
Explicitly state that both Windows and Linux Arc-enabled servers are supported, and clarify any differences in usage or script syntax.
Add a section or note describing how to use the run-command feature for Linux servers, including common use cases and troubleshooting tips.
Where possible, alternate the order of examples or provide parallel examples for both platforms to avoid implicit prioritization of Windows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Migrate Azure Arc-enabled server to Azure ...rticles/azure-arc/servers/scenario-migrate-to-azure.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by frequently referencing Azure PowerShell and Windows-centric tools first, providing detailed PowerShell commands and workflows, and omitting explicit Linux shell (bash) examples. While Linux is mentioned in passing (e.g., Linux agent), there are no concrete Linux CLI commands or instructions, and PowerShell is consistently presented as the primary method for management tasks.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Linux shell (bash) command examples alongside PowerShell commands, especially for inventorying extensions and managing role assignments.
Explicitly mention and link to Linux-specific documentation or tools where available, such as az CLI usage in bash environments.
Ensure that instructions for installing and managing agents and extensions are equally detailed for both Windows and Linux, including troubleshooting steps.
Avoid presenting Windows/PowerShell methods first; alternate or parallelize instructions for both platforms.
Include screenshots or code snippets from Linux environments to reinforce parity.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Security overview ...b/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/security-overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by referencing PowerShell Desired State Configuration as the basis for guest configuration policies, without mentioning Linux equivalents (such as Ansible, Chef, or native shell scripts). Windows service accounts (e.g., NT SERVICE\himds, Local System, Network Service) are described in detail before their Linux counterparts, and examples (such as extension allowlists) focus on Windows-specific extensions. There are no explicit Linux configuration or security examples, and Linux tools or patterns are not discussed.

Recommendations

Include Linux-native configuration management equivalents (e.g., Ansible, Chef, shell scripts) in the guest configuration section.
Provide examples of extension allowlists and agent lockdown for Linux servers, referencing Linux-specific extensions and security tools.
Describe Linux service/daemon management patterns (e.g., systemd units, user accounts) with equal detail and prominence as Windows service accounts.
Mention Linux compliance and security best practices alongside Windows, such as SELinux, AppArmor, or auditd.
Ensure examples and recommendations are presented for both Windows and Linux platforms, or clarify platform-specific differences where relevant.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc REST API Requests for the Run Command on Azure Arc-enabled Servers (Preview) ...ob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/run-command-rest.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All example scenarios use Windows Server as the target OS, with scripts written in PowerShell (New-NetFirewallRule). There are no examples for Linux servers, nor any mention of Linux shell scripting or Linux firewall tools. Windows-specific tools (PowerShell, New-AzStorageBlobSASToken) are referenced exclusively, and the documentation assumes a Windows-centric workflow throughout.

Recommendations

Add example scenarios for Linux Arc-enabled servers, including REST API payloads that execute bash scripts or use Linux-native firewall commands (e.g., ufw, iptables).
Explicitly mention Linux as a supported OS in the introduction and prerequisites.
Provide parity in script examples: for every PowerShell example, include a bash/sh example for Linux.
Reference Linux tools for generating SAS tokens and managing blobs, if available, or provide cross-platform alternatives.
Clarify any OS-specific limitations or differences in Run command support.
Update related content links to include Linux-focused documentation or guides.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Run command on Azure Arc-enabled servers (Preview) ...cs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/run-command.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a subtle Windows bias. While it claims support for both Windows and Linux, examples and next steps focus on Azure CLI and PowerShell, with PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) given equal prominence to CLI and REST. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) examples or references to Linux-native tooling. Windows tools and patterns (PowerShell, Remote Desktop Protocol) are mentioned, while SSH (the Linux equivalent) is referenced only in passing. The documentation does not provide Linux-specific usage patterns or examples.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for using Run command, alongside PowerShell examples.
Mention SSH as the Linux equivalent to RDP when discussing remote access alternatives.
Clarify and demonstrate Linux-native script execution (e.g., running bash scripts) in the overview.
Ensure that Linux tools and patterns are referenced with equal prominence to Windows tools.
Include troubleshooting or usage notes specific to Linux environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Configuration and remote access ...es/azure-arc/servers/security-machine-configuration.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by emphasizing PowerShell Desired State Configuration as the foundation for Azure Machine Configuration, mentioning Windows Admin Center (WAC) as a primary remote management tool, and providing detailed explanations for Windows-specific tools and patterns. Linux equivalents (such as Ansible, SSH management, or Linux-native configuration tools) are not mentioned or are only referenced in passing. There are no Linux-specific configuration or remote management examples, and the documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tools and workflows.

Recommendations

Include Linux-native configuration management examples (e.g., using Ansible, Chef, or native Linux DSC).
Provide parity in remote access tooling by mentioning and documenting Linux equivalents to Windows Admin Center, or clarify that such equivalents do not exist and suggest best practices for Linux management.
Offer example workflows for Linux systems, such as SSH-based management, sudo configuration, and compliance checking using Linux tools.
Balance the order of presentation so that Linux and Windows scenarios are introduced together, rather than Windows tools and roles being described first or in greater detail.
Add explicit Linux-focused sections or callouts to ensure Linux administrators can find relevant guidance without needing to interpret Windows-centric instructions.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Security onboarding and updates ...main/articles/azure-arc/servers/security-onboarding.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by frequently mentioning Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., Group Policy, Microsoft Update, WSUS) before or in greater detail than their Linux equivalents. PowerShell is referenced for extension management and onboarding, with no equivalent Linux shell examples. Linux guidance is present but often less detailed or appears after Windows instructions. Some sections (e.g., onboarding via browser) are explicitly marked as Windows-only, and automation examples favor Windows tools first.

Recommendations

Provide Linux shell (bash) examples alongside PowerShell commands for onboarding and extension management.
Mention Linux automation tools (e.g., cloud-init, shell scripts, Ansible) with equal prominence and detail as Windows tools like Group Policy.
Ensure update management guidance for Linux (e.g., using apt, yum, dnf, zypper) is as detailed as Windows update instructions.
Add links to Linux-specific onboarding and configuration documentation where Windows-specific links (e.g., Group Policy onboarding) are provided.
When listing tools or patterns, alternate the order or present both Windows and Linux options together to avoid 'Windows first' bias.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc SSH access to Azure Arc-enabled servers ...ob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/ssh-arc-overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows-specific instructions, tools, and examples (PowerShell, Windows Server notes, OpenSSH for Windows) are frequently mentioned, sometimes before or in greater detail than their Linux equivalents. PowerShell examples are provided for nearly every step, and Windows tools are referenced prominently. Linux instructions are present but often less detailed, and Linux-specific troubleshooting or configuration examples are limited.

Recommendations

Ensure Linux instructions and examples are as detailed and prominent as Windows ones, especially for service management and troubleshooting.
Provide explicit Linux command-line examples for all steps, not just package installation and process checking (e.g., systemctl commands for managing sshd).
Balance references to Windows and Linux tools in 'Next steps' and throughout the documentation.
Include troubleshooting and configuration guidance for common Linux distributions (Ubuntu, RHEL, etc.), not just generic or Windows-focused links.
Where PowerShell examples are given, provide equivalent bash or shell commands for Linux users.
Avoid mentioning Windows features (such as OpenSSH being installed by default) before Linux equivalents unless contextually necessary.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Troubleshoot SSH access to Azure Arc-enabled servers ...ain/articles/azure-arc/servers/ssh-arc-troubleshoot.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page exhibits a Windows bias by prioritizing PowerShell-based troubleshooting steps and examples, referencing Windows-specific error messages and tools, and omitting equivalent Linux command-line instructions or examples. Most troubleshooting guidance is centered around Azure PowerShell modules and commands, with little to no mention of Linux-native workflows or commands. Error messages and solutions often assume a Windows environment, and Linux alternatives are either missing or mentioned only in passing.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and examples alongside PowerShell instructions, such as using Bash, SSH, and native Linux tools.
Include Linux error messages and their resolutions, especially for issues like missing binaries, permissions, and module installation.
Offer parity in command-line examples by showing both PowerShell and Bash/Azure CLI equivalents for all steps.
Reference Linux package managers (e.g., apt, yum) for installing required modules or binaries.
Ensure that environment variable instructions cover both Windows (PATH) and Linux ($PATH) conventions.
Add troubleshooting guidance for common Linux SSH issues, such as SELinux/AppArmor restrictions, file permissions, and service management (systemctl).

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Troubleshoot Azure Arc-enabled servers networking issues .../articles/azure-arc/servers/troubleshoot-networking.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page focuses exclusively on troubleshooting TLS configuration issues for Windows servers, providing only Windows-specific instructions and examples (PowerShell, Group Policy, Registry edits). There are no equivalent troubleshooting steps, commands, or guidance for Linux-based Arc-enabled servers, nor is Linux mentioned in the context of TLS/cipher suite configuration.

Recommendations

Add a dedicated section for Linux TLS/cipher suite troubleshooting, including relevant commands (e.g., using openssl, update-crypto-policy, or editing /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf).
Provide Linux command-line examples for listing and enabling cipher suites (e.g., openssl ciphers, update-crypto-policy).
Mention Linux-specific configuration files and tools (such as /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf, update-crypto-policy, or system-wide crypto policies).
Ensure parity in troubleshooting steps by describing how to verify and modify cipher suites on both Windows and Linux platforms.
Clearly indicate which instructions apply to Windows and which to Linux, or provide a cross-platform table for quick reference.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Troubleshoot Azure Connected Machine agent connection issues ...ticles/azure-arc/servers/troubleshoot-agent-onboard.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates some Windows bias. Windows examples and tools (such as PowerShell syntax, Windows environment variables, and Windows file paths) are often presented first or exclusively, while Linux equivalents are sometimes mentioned later or less prominently. Some troubleshooting steps and log file locations use Windows conventions before Linux ones. PowerShell and Windows-specific instructions are more detailed, and Linux instructions are sometimes less emphasized or missing.

Recommendations

Present Windows and Linux examples side-by-side or in parallel sections, rather than listing Windows first.
Ensure Linux commands and file paths are given equal prominence and detail as Windows examples.
Include Linux-specific troubleshooting steps and log file locations wherever Windows equivalents are mentioned.
Avoid using Windows-centric terminology (e.g., 'elevated command prompt') without also mentioning Linux equivalents (e.g., 'sudo').
Where PowerShell is referenced, provide Bash or shell alternatives for Linux users.
Review all examples and tables to ensure Linux users have clear, actionable guidance equal to Windows users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc How to troubleshoot delivery of Extended Security Updates for Windows Server 2012 through Azure Arc ...-arc/servers/troubleshoot-extended-security-updates.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation is exclusively focused on troubleshooting Extended Security Updates for Windows Server 2012 via Azure Arc, with all examples, commands, and troubleshooting steps tailored for Windows environments. There are no Linux equivalents or cross-platform guidance, and Windows-specific tools and patterns (e.g., certutil, PowerShell, Windows file paths) are used throughout. The documentation assumes the reader is managing Windows workloads and does not address scenarios for Linux servers, even though Azure Arc can manage both Windows and Linux machines.

Recommendations

Clarify in the introduction that the guidance is specific to Windows Server 2012 and does not apply to Linux servers, or provide a parallel section for Linux if relevant.
Where possible, mention whether similar troubleshooting steps or ESU mechanisms exist for Linux workloads managed via Azure Arc.
If certificate installation or agent troubleshooting is relevant for Linux, provide Linux shell command equivalents (e.g., using openssl, update-ca-certificates, systemctl) alongside Windows commands.
Include cross-platform notes or links to Linux-specific documentation for Azure Arc-enabled servers.
Avoid using Windows-specific terminology (e.g., elevated command prompt, Windows file paths) without clarifying that these steps are for Windows only.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Tutorial - Monitor a hybrid machine with Azure Monitor VM insights ...icles/azure-arc/servers/tutorial-enable-vm-insights.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing explicit instructions and examples for Windows systems, such as referencing the Windows event log and the Event table, while omitting equivalent Linux examples (e.g., syslog or Linux event sources). Windows terminology and tools are mentioned first or exclusively, and there is a lack of parity in showing how Linux machines' data is collected or queried.

Recommendations

Include explicit examples and screenshots for Linux machines, such as how to view syslog or other Linux-specific logs in Log Analytics.
Clarify which tables and data sources are available for Linux machines, and provide sample queries for Linux event data.
Mention Linux tools and terminology alongside Windows equivalents (e.g., syslog vs. Windows event log) to ensure parity.
Add a section or callout that highlights differences in monitoring and data collection between Windows and Linux machines.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Overview of Azure Connected Machine agent to manage Windows and Linux machines ...center-virtual-machine-manager/agent-overview-scvmm.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_heavy_detail

Summary

The documentation provides a reasonably balanced overview of Azure Connected Machine agent support for both Windows and Linux. However, there is a noticeable Windows bias: Windows installation details are presented first and in greater depth, with explicit mention of Windows-specific tools (MSI installer, Windows services, NT SERVICE accounts, Group Policy adjustments, Windows security groups, and environment variables). The Linux section is present and fairly complete, but it is positioned after the Windows section and lacks some of the troubleshooting and configuration nuance found in the Windows section. Additionally, the resource governance table lists Windows extensions before Linux ones, and some extension types (OmsAgentForLinux) are incorrectly listed as Windows-only.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux sections, or present them in parallel/subsections for each topic to avoid 'Windows first' bias.
Ensure Linux installation details include troubleshooting tips, service management commands (e.g., systemctl), and security/account management equivalents.
Provide parity in depth for Linux, such as describing Linux-specific security groups, permissions, and post-uninstall artifacts.
Correct extension type listings (e.g., OmsAgentForLinux should be under Linux, not Windows) and ensure extension CPU limits are clearly mapped for both OSes.
Add links to Linux package repositories and installation guides with equal prominence to Windows download links.
Include Linux-specific configuration scenarios (e.g., SELinux/AppArmor, systemd unit files, log rotation) where relevant.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Create a virtual machine on System Center Virtual Machine Manager using Azure Arc ...nter-virtual-machine-manager/create-virtual-machine.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation is heavily focused on System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM), a Windows-centric virtualization management tool. All instructions, terminology, and workflows are tailored to SCVMM and its integration with Azure Arc, with no mention of Linux-based virtualization platforms (such as KVM, libvirt, or oVirt), nor examples for Linux administrators. The prerequisites, steps, and screenshots all assume a Windows/SCVMM environment, and alternative Linux-based methods are not referenced or provided.

Recommendations

Add equivalent guidance for Linux-based virtualization platforms (e.g., KVM, oVirt, libvirt) where supported by Azure Arc.
Include examples and screenshots for creating VMs on Linux hosts managed by Azure Arc, if applicable.
Reference Linux CLI tools and workflows (such as Bash scripts, Linux-specific Azure CLI usage) alongside PowerShell and Windows tools.
Clarify in the introduction that the guide is specific to SCVMM/Windows, and provide links to Linux-focused documentation for Azure Arc VM management if available.
Ensure parity in prerequisites and role assignments for Linux environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Recover from accidental deletion of resource bridge VM ...em-center-virtual-machine-manager/disaster-recovery.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation exclusively provides recovery instructions and scripts for Windows environments, specifically using PowerShell. There are no examples, scripts, or guidance for performing the same recovery operation from a Linux or cross-platform environment. The script provided is Windows-specific, and there is no mention of Linux tools or shell equivalents.

Recommendations

Add equivalent recovery steps and scripts for Linux environments, using Bash or cross-platform scripting languages.
Explicitly mention Linux prerequisites and provide instructions for running the recovery from a Linux machine.
Offer downloadable Linux-compatible scripts or containerized solutions.
Present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel sections to ensure parity and avoid platform bias.
Clarify any platform-specific limitations and suggest workarounds for non-Windows users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Enable VM CRUD and power cycle operational ability in an SCVMM managed Arc-enabled server machine ...rtual-machine-manager/enable-virtual-hardware-scvmm.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation is heavily focused on SCVMM (System Center Virtual Machine Manager), a Windows-centric virtualization management tool. All examples, instructions, and screenshots reference Windows tools and interfaces, with no mention of Linux equivalents or cross-platform alternatives. There are no CLI or Linux-based management instructions, and the workflow assumes a Windows environment from start to finish.

Recommendations

Add equivalent instructions for managing Arc-enabled VMs on Linux-based hypervisors (e.g., KVM, VMware on Linux).
Include CLI examples using Azure CLI, PowerShell, and Bash, highlighting cross-platform usage.
Reference Linux management tools or interfaces where applicable, and clarify any limitations or differences.
Provide screenshots or walkthroughs for Linux environments if supported.
Explicitly state platform requirements and offer guidance for non-Windows users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Create custom roles with Azure Arc-enabled VMware vSphere ...ticles/azure-arc/vmware-vsphere/create-custom-roles.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing the Azure portal (which is most commonly accessed from Windows environments), mentioning Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI, and omitting explicit Linux-specific examples or guidance. There are no screenshots or instructions for Linux-native tools or workflows, and the use of PowerShell is referenced without parity for Bash or Linux shell environments.

Recommendations

Include explicit examples for Azure CLI commands, with Bash syntax, alongside PowerShell instructions.
Add notes or screenshots for accessing the Azure portal from Linux or macOS browsers, if there are any differences.
Provide step-by-step instructions for creating custom roles using Azure CLI on Linux, not just PowerShell.
Reference Linux-native automation options (e.g., Bash scripts, cloud-init) where relevant.
Ensure REST API and ARM/Bicep template instructions include cross-platform usage notes.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Deliver ESUs for SCVMM VMs through Arc ...ver-esus-for-system-center-virtual-machine-manager-vms.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation is heavily focused on Windows Server environments, specifically Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 VMs managed by SCVMM. All examples, terminology, and referenced tools are Windows-centric (e.g., SCVMM, Windows Server Update Services, Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager). There are no Linux equivalents or examples, and Linux VMs, tools, or update patterns are not mentioned at all. The documentation assumes the reader is working exclusively with Windows workloads.

Recommendations

Explicitly state that the process is only applicable to Windows Server VMs, and clarify whether Linux VMs managed by SCVMM or Azure Arc are supported or not.
If Azure Arc supports Linux VMs in any capacity, add a section or note describing how ESU or similar lifecycle management is handled for Linux workloads.
Provide parity in patch management examples by mentioning Linux-compatible update solutions (e.g., Azure Update Manager for Linux, native Linux package managers like apt/yum, or third-party Linux patching tools) where relevant.
Include guidance or links for managing security updates and lifecycle for Linux VMs in hybrid environments managed by Azure Arc, if applicable.
Review terminology and tool references to ensure Linux administrators are not excluded from the narrative, or add cross-references to Linux documentation where appropriate.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Install Arc agent on SCVMM VMs ...al-machine-manager/enable-guest-management-at-scale.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows operating systems and tools (such as PowerShell, Group Policy, Configuration Manager) are mentioned first and in greater detail. The Azure portal method is only available for Windows VMs, with Linux relegated to 'script or out-of-band methods.' Windows-specific automation tools are listed before Linux equivalents, and PowerShell is referenced more frequently than bash or Linux-native tools. Linux instructions and examples are present but are generally secondary, less detailed, and sometimes only mentioned as alternatives.

Recommendations

Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, giving equal prominence to both.
Include Linux-native automation tools (e.g., cloud-init, shell scripts, systemd units) alongside Windows tools like Group Policy and Configuration Manager.
Provide more detailed Linux examples, including troubleshooting steps and automation patterns.
Where possible, clarify which features are available for Linux and Windows, and avoid language that positions Windows as the default or primary platform.
Add explicit references to Linux compatibility in the Azure portal method, or clarify limitations and suggest improvements.
Ensure that script downloads and usage instructions for Linux are as detailed and accessible as those for Windows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Overview of the Azure Arc-enabled System Center Virtual Machine Manager ...-arc/system-center-virtual-machine-manager/overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing on System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM), a Windows-only product, and repeatedly referencing Windows Server management, PowerShell, and Windows-specific tools and features. Examples and guidance are centered around Windows environments, with Linux support mentioned only as an afterthought or in aggregate ("Windows or Linux"), and no Linux-specific examples, tools, or patterns are provided. Automation and configuration scenarios prioritize PowerShell and Windows registry, with Linux daemons referenced only in passing. The onboarding script and operational guidance do not specify Linux alternatives or provide parity in walkthroughs.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-specific examples and walkthroughs for onboarding, automation, and management tasks, including shell scripts and Linux-native tooling.
Explicitly mention Linux support in all relevant scenarios, and ensure Linux is presented alongside Windows (not only as an add-on).
Include Linux-focused documentation for VM lifecycle operations, agent installation, and monitoring/configuration tasks.
Offer parity in automation guidance by highlighting Bash, Python, and other Linux-friendly approaches, not just PowerShell.
Reference Linux-specific management features and challenges, such as SELinux, systemd, and package management, where relevant.
Ensure that links and references to Azure services (e.g., Update Manager, Automanage) include Linux tabs/examples, not just Windows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Remove your SCVMM environment from Azure Arc ...virtual-machine-manager/remove-scvmm-from-azure-arc.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation shows a clear Windows bias: SCVMM is a Windows-only technology, but the instructions and tooling (such as the deboarding script) are exclusively for Windows/PowerShell. The deboarding script is only provided as a PowerShell (.ps1) file, with no Linux or cross-platform alternative. Script execution instructions and examples are Windows/PowerShell-centric, and there is no mention of Linux equivalents for SCVMM management or resource removal. While uninstall instructions for the Azure Connected Machine agent include both Windows and Linux, all other operational steps and examples focus solely on Windows environments.

Recommendations

Provide a cross-platform (e.g., Bash or Python) deboarding script for Linux environments, or document manual REST API or CLI steps for resource removal that can be run from Linux.
Clarify that SCVMM is Windows-only, but explicitly state what steps (if any) are relevant for Linux-based management servers or hybrid environments.
Where PowerShell is used, offer Azure CLI or REST API alternatives that can be executed from Linux or macOS.
Add guidance for environments where SCVMM-managed VMs are Linux-based, especially for resource bridge and agent removal steps.
Ensure parity in example order and detail: present Linux instructions alongside Windows, not only for agent removal but for all steps where possible.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Switch to the new version of Arc-enabled SCVMM ...ual-machine-manager/switch-to-the-new-version-scvmm.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM), which is a Windows-only tool, and by providing instructions and agent management links that use Windows-specific tabs and terminology. There are no Linux equivalents or examples provided, nor is there mention of Linux-based management tools or patterns. The documentation assumes a Windows-centric environment throughout.

Recommendations

Include guidance for managing Linux-based virtual machines, if supported by Arc-enabled SCVMM.
Provide agent management instructions for both Windows and Linux, with appropriate links and examples.
Clarify whether the product or workflow is Windows-only, and if so, explicitly state this limitation.
If Linux support is available, add parity in screenshots, step-by-step instructions, and troubleshooting for Linux scenarios.
Reference cross-platform tools or alternatives where applicable, and avoid using Windows terminology exclusively.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Troubleshoot SCVMM-specific Azure Arc resource bridge deployment errors ...m-center-virtual-machine-manager/troubleshoot-scvmm.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page focuses exclusively on troubleshooting errors related to SCVMM (System Center Virtual Machine Manager), a Windows-only tool. All error examples reference PowerShell sessions (PSSession), Windows-specific permissions, and SCVMM operations, with no mention of Linux equivalents, tools, or troubleshooting steps. There are no examples or guidance for Linux environments, and Windows terminology and tools are used throughout.

Recommendations

Add troubleshooting steps and examples for Linux-based resource bridge deployments, if supported.
Include equivalent Linux commands (e.g., SSH, Bash scripts) alongside PowerShell examples.
Clarify in the introduction whether Linux environments are supported or not, and provide links to Linux-specific documentation if available.
If SCVMM is Windows-only, explicitly state this limitation and direct Linux users to relevant Azure Arc documentation for Linux platforms.
Ensure parity in error documentation by listing Linux-specific errors and their troubleshooting guides, where applicable.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc What's new in Azure Arc-enabled SCVMM ...arc/system-center-virtual-machine-manager/whats-new.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation page for Azure Arc-enabled SCVMM demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric tools and management patterns. Windows Server management features, PowerShell-based VM management, and Windows-specific tools (e.g., Group Policy, System Center Configuration Manager) are mentioned before or more prominently than Linux equivalents. There is limited mention of Linux-native management options, and examples or features for Linux VMs are missing or not highlighted.

Recommendations

Include explicit examples and documentation for managing Linux VMs with Azure Arc-enabled SCVMM, such as using SSH, Linux guest agents, or Linux-native automation tools.
Provide parity in tooling by highlighting Linux-compatible management options (e.g., Bash scripts, cloud-init, Linux configuration management tools) alongside Windows tools like PowerShell and Group Policy.
Ensure that features and enhancements relevant to Linux VMs are described with equal prominence and detail as those for Windows VMs.
Add cross-platform examples in sections that currently only mention Windows-centric tools, such as showing both PowerShell and Bash/Ansible usage for agent installation.
Clarify which features are Windows-only and which are available for Linux, to help administrators understand platform support.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Quickstart for Azure Arc-enabled System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM) ...t-connect-system-center-virtual-machine-manager-to-arc.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows prerequisites, tools, and examples. Windows-specific instructions (e.g., PowerShell, Set-ExecutionPolicy, copying tar.exe) are more detailed and appear first. Linux instructions are present but less detailed, and performance on Linux is discouraged. Windows tools (PowerShell, WinRM, tar.exe for Windows) are referenced exclusively or before Linux equivalents. Some troubleshooting and retry examples are more verbose for Windows. There is limited guidance for Linux users, and some steps (like copying tar.exe) are Windows-only.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-first or parallel instructions for all steps, including prerequisites and troubleshooting.
Offer more detailed Linux examples, including installation of required tools (e.g., tar, OpenSSH) on Linux.
Avoid discouraging Linux usage without offering mitigation or optimization tips for Linux environments.
Reference Linux-native tools and patterns (e.g., systemctl, SSH config) where appropriate.
Ensure parity in troubleshooting and retry commands for both platforms.
Clarify any platform-specific limitations and suggest workarounds for Linux users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Support matrix for Azure Arc-enabled System Center Virtual Machine Manager ...pport-matrix-for-system-center-virtual-machine-manager.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by prioritizing Windows Server and SCVMM (a Windows-only tool) throughout, providing detailed requirements and examples for Windows environments, and referencing Windows-specific tools and ports (WinRM, Windows Management Framework, PowerShell/Win32-OpenSSH). Linux is mentioned only as a secondary option, with minimal detail and no Linux-specific deployment examples or troubleshooting guidance. The workstation section notes Linux can be used but warns of performance issues, without offering mitigation or parity in instructions.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux deployment examples and troubleshooting steps, especially for Resource Bridge and agent installation.
Include Linux-specific networking and firewall requirements, with examples for common distributions.
Offer guidance on optimizing performance when deploying from Linux workstations, or clarify limitations and alternatives.
Reference Linux equivalents for Windows tools (e.g., alternatives to WinRM, OpenSSH usage on Linux, systemd service management).
Ensure all instructions and requirements are presented with equal detail for both Windows and Linux environments, including supported Linux distributions and versions.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc agent ...n/articles/azure-arc/vmware-vsphere/azure-arc-agent.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows agent installation details before Linux, using Windows-specific terminology (MSI, services, NT SERVICE accounts, Group Policy), and providing more granular detail and troubleshooting information for Windows. Linux instructions are present but less detailed, and there are no Linux-specific troubleshooting tips or parity in administrative patterns (e.g., systemd service management, SELinux/AppArmor considerations). Windows tools and patterns (Group Policy, MSI, NT SERVICE) are mentioned without Linux equivalents, and some extension examples are Windows-centric.

Recommendations

Present Windows and Linux installation details in parallel or alternate order to avoid Windows-first bias.
Expand Linux agent installation instructions to include troubleshooting tips, service management commands (systemctl), and security context considerations (SELinux/AppArmor).
Provide Linux equivalents for Windows administrative concepts (e.g., instead of Group Policy, mention PAM, sudoers, or systemd drop-ins for service rights).
Ensure extension examples and resource governance tables include Linux-specific extensions and clarify any differences.
Add Linux-specific log file analysis and troubleshooting steps.
Where Windows tools or patterns are mentioned, provide Linux alternatives or note differences explicitly.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Install Arc agent at scale for your VMware VMs ...arc/vmware-vsphere/enable-guest-management-at-scale.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several ways: PowerShell is the only shell used in automation examples, with no Bash or Linux shell equivalents provided. Windows Task Scheduler is exclusively mentioned for scheduling scripts, omitting Linux cron or systemd alternatives. The main automation script is described as being run in PowerShell, and all step-by-step instructions for script execution are Windows-centric. Linux-specific guidance is limited to a sudo configuration note, and there are no Linux shell or scheduling examples for large-scale agent installation.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Bash shell examples for running the automation script on Linux systems.
Include instructions for scheduling the script using Linux cron or systemd timers, not just Windows Task Scheduler.
Clarify whether the helper script can run cross-platform (e.g., via PowerShell Core on Linux, or provide a Bash/Python alternative if not).
Ensure that out-of-band automation methods (e.g., Ansible) are given equal prominence and example detail as Windows-centric methods.
Add explicit Linux VM examples for agent installation at scale, including command-line and scheduling workflows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Deliver ESUs for VMware VMs through Arc ...r-extended-security-updates-for-vmware-vms-through-arc.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation is heavily focused on Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 VMs, with all examples, tools, and scenarios centered around Windows environments. There are no references to Linux VMs, Linux patching tools, or cross-platform considerations. Windows-specific tools (WSUS, Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, Azure Update Manager) are mentioned exclusively, and the workflow is tailored for Windows workloads.

Recommendations

Add explicit statements clarifying that ESUs are only available for Windows Server, and provide guidance for Linux VM security update management in similar hybrid environments.
Include references to Linux patching solutions (such as Azure Update Manager for Linux, or third-party Linux patch management tools) where appropriate.
If Azure Arc supports similar lifecycle management for Linux VMs, provide parallel documentation or cross-links to those workflows.
Ensure that prerequisites and eligible resources sections mention Linux VMs (if supported) or explicitly state their exclusion.
Consider adding a comparison table of update/patch management for Windows vs. Linux VMs in Azure Arc-enabled VMware environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc What is Azure Arc-enabled VMware vSphere? ...lob/main/articles/azure-arc/vmware-vsphere/overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by frequently referencing Windows-specific management features (such as Windows Server management, Extended Security Updates for Windows Server and SQL Server), mentioning Windows tools (PowerShell, Windows registry, Windows-specific tabs) before or instead of Linux equivalents, and lacking Linux-specific examples or guidance. While Linux is mentioned in some contexts (e.g., Azure Update Manager supports Windows and Linux), the documentation does not provide parity in examples, tooling, or feature highlights for Linux environments.

Recommendations

Include explicit Linux management examples and scenarios alongside Windows examples, such as Linux VM lifecycle operations, Linux-specific VM extensions, and Linux daemon configuration.
Provide Linux-first or Linux-parity instructions in sections that currently reference Windows tools or features (e.g., show how to use Bash, SSH, or Linux-native automation for VM management and configuration).
Highlight Linux-specific benefits and features of Azure Arc-enabled VMware vSphere, such as integration with popular Linux distributions, support for Linux security and compliance tools, and automation using Ansible or other Linux-native frameworks.
Ensure that all references to Windows tools (PowerShell, Windows registry, etc.) are balanced with equivalent Linux tools (Bash, systemd, Linux file system, etc.), and provide examples for both platforms.
Add links to Linux-focused documentation and guides where Windows-focused links are present, ensuring equal visibility and discoverability for Linux users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Connect VMware vCenter Server to Azure Arc by using the helper script ...ere/quick-start-connect-vcenter-to-arc-using-script.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows/PowerShell instructions and notes are presented before Linux/Bash equivalents in several sections, such as script download/run and troubleshooting. PowerShell-specific guidance (e.g., Set-ExecutionPolicy, PowerShell ISE caveats) is detailed, while Linux instructions are more minimal. Windows terminology and tooling (PowerShell) are emphasized, and screenshots are from the Azure portal, which is platform-agnostic but the workflow assumes familiarity with Windows conventions.

Recommendations

Present Linux/Bash instructions alongside or before Windows/PowerShell instructions in each section to ensure parity.
Include Linux-specific troubleshooting notes (e.g., permissions, shell compatibility) similar to the PowerShell ISE note for Windows.
Expand Linux instructions to cover common issues (e.g., executable permissions, required dependencies) and provide more context for Bash users.
Where Windows-specific commands/tools are mentioned (e.g., Set-ExecutionPolicy), offer equivalent Linux context (e.g., chmod +x, shell environment notes).
Ensure screenshots and UI references are platform-neutral or provide Linux-specific examples where relevant.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Perform disaster recovery operations ...mware-vsphere/recover-from-resource-bridge-deletion.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias by exclusively providing PowerShell examples and instructions, referencing only .ps1 scripts, and omitting any mention of Linux or cross-platform alternatives. There are no Bash or shell script examples, and the onboarding/recovery workflow assumes a Windows environment for script execution. The documentation also refers to editing and running PowerShell scripts without noting Linux compatibility or providing guidance for non-Windows users.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Bash or shell script examples for onboarding and disaster recovery, or clarify if the onboarding script is cross-platform.
Explicitly state the platform requirements for the onboarding script (e.g., if it can be run on Linux/macOS with PowerShell Core).
If the onboarding script is Windows-only, offer a Linux-compatible version or document how to run it using PowerShell Core on Linux.
Include screenshots or CLI steps for both Windows and Linux environments when referencing tools or consoles.
Review all steps to ensure parity in instructions for Linux administrators, including file editing and script execution.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Bulk Review, Publish, and Deploy with Workload Orchestration ...es/azure-arc/workload-orchestration/bulk-deployment.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias through exclusive use of PowerShell syntax for CLI commands, references to Windows-specific scripts (.ps1), and lack of Linux shell (bash) equivalents or examples. All CLI examples use PowerShell formatting, and automation scripts are provided only as PowerShell scripts, with no mention of Linux shell scripts or cross-platform alternatives. The documentation does not address Linux-specific usage patterns or provide guidance for Linux users, despite Azure CLI being cross-platform.

Recommendations

Provide bash/zsh shell equivalents for all CLI command examples, using Linux-friendly syntax and conventions.
Offer automation scripts in both PowerShell (.ps1) and bash (.sh) formats, or provide cross-platform alternatives (e.g., Python).
Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands can be run on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and clarify any OS-specific differences in file paths, quoting, or environment variables.
Include Linux-specific instructions for preparing input files, running scripts, and troubleshooting common issues.
Avoid using PowerShell syntax (e.g., $variable) in generic CLI documentation unless accompanied by equivalent bash syntax.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Diagnostics of Edge-Related Logs and Errors in Workload Orchestration .../azure-arc/workload-orchestration/diagnose-problems.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All command-line examples use PowerShell syntax and conventions, with no Bash or Linux shell equivalents. Paths in JSON templates and examples use Windows-style (backslash) paths, and scripts are referenced as PowerShell (.ps1) files. There are no instructions or examples for Linux users, and Windows tooling is assumed throughout. This may hinder Linux users or those working in cross-platform environments.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Bash or shell script examples for all PowerShell commands, using Linux path conventions.
Include instructions for running scripts on Linux/macOS, such as using Azure CLI in Bash.
Use platform-neutral file paths in templates, or provide both Windows and Linux path examples.
Clarify which steps are platform-specific and offer alternatives for Linux users (e.g., .sh scripts, WSL guidance).
Add notes or sections explicitly addressing Linux environments, including troubleshooting and setup differences.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Remove your VMware vCenter environment from Azure Arc ...e-arc/vmware-vsphere/remove-vcenter-from-arc-vmware.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias by presenting Windows/Powershell instructions and tools first and in greater detail. The deboarding script is only described for Windows/PowerShell, with no Linux or cross-platform alternative provided. Windows uninstall steps are more detailed, and PowerShell commands are used for agent disconnect and script execution, with no mention of Bash or Linux shell equivalents. There is no guidance for running the deboarding script on Linux or MacOS, nor are there examples using Linux-native tools.

Recommendations

Provide instructions and examples for running the deboarding script on Linux and MacOS, including prerequisites and shell commands.
Include Bash or shell equivalents for agent disconnect and script execution, not just PowerShell.
Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, or clearly label sections for each OS to avoid Windows-first ordering.
Clarify whether the deboarding script is cross-platform, and if not, offer a Linux version or alternative manual steps for Linux users.
Ensure uninstall instructions for Linux are as detailed as those for Windows, including folder cleanup if needed.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Clean-Up Script for Workload Orchestration ...es/azure-arc/workload-orchestration/clean-up-script.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page exclusively provides instructions and examples for running a PowerShell script (RGCleanScript.ps1) to clean up Azure resources, with no mention of Linux-compatible alternatives or cross-platform usage. All example commands use PowerShell syntax, and there is no guidance for Bash, shell, or Linux users. The script itself is a Windows-centric tool, and the documentation assumes a Windows environment by default.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Bash or shell script examples for Linux/macOS users, or clarify if the PowerShell script is compatible with PowerShell Core on Linux.
Explicitly mention cross-platform compatibility of the script, including any prerequisites for running it on Linux (e.g., PowerShell Core installation).
Offer instructions for running the clean-up process using Azure CLI commands, which are natively cross-platform.
List both Windows and Linux usage patterns in the documentation, ensuring that Linux instructions are given equal prominence.
If only PowerShell is supported, add a note explaining this limitation and suggest alternatives or workarounds for Linux users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Staging Resources Before Deployment ...icles/azure-arc/workload-orchestration/how-to-stage.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for all major steps, but there are several signs of Windows bias. PowerShell examples are given equal prominence to Bash, even for tasks that are more naturally performed in Bash/Linux environments (e.g., base64 encoding, file manipulation). Some PowerShell examples use Windows-specific patterns (e.g., Out-File, [Convert]::ToBase64String), and certain instructions (such as removing carriage returns) are tailored for Windows. There are also minor inconsistencies, such as using 'export' in PowerShell, which is not idiomatic. The documentation does not provide any examples for native Linux tools or workflows outside of Bash, and does not mention Linux desktop tools or editors for file encoding changes. The portal instructions are Windows-centric, assuming use of Azure Portal and not mentioning Linux-native alternatives.

Recommendations

Prioritize Bash/Linux examples before PowerShell, as most orchestration and container workflows are Linux-first.
Clarify which commands are platform-agnostic and which require Windows-specific tools or syntax.
For file encoding changes, mention Linux-native editors (e.g., vim, nano) and how to convert file encoding in Linux.
Remove or correct non-idiomatic PowerShell usage (e.g., 'export' in PowerShell blocks).
Where possible, provide platform-specific troubleshooting tips (e.g., how to check file encoding on Linux vs Windows).
Add explicit notes about any steps that differ between Linux and Windows, especially for file manipulation and encoding.
Consider adding a section on using Linux desktop tools or command-line utilities for users who do not use Windows or PowerShell.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Migrate Existing Target Resources to General Availability ...s/azure-arc/workload-orchestration/migration-script.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only a PowerShell migration script example, referencing a .ps1 file (Windows/PowerShell-specific), and omitting any Linux shell or cross-platform alternatives. The instructions assume the user is on Windows or has access to PowerShell, with no mention of Bash, shell scripts, or how to run the migration on Linux or macOS systems.

Recommendations

Provide a Bash or shell script equivalent for Linux/macOS users, or document how to run the migration using Azure CLI or other cross-platform tools.
Explicitly mention platform requirements and offer guidance for non-Windows users, such as using PowerShell Core on Linux/macOS or alternative migration steps.
Include examples for both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux/macOS (Bash/shell), ensuring parity in instructions and tooling.
Clarify whether the migration script can be run in Azure Cloud Shell (which supports both Bash and PowerShell), and provide instructions for both environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Prepare the Environment for Workload Orchestration ...rc/workload-orchestration/initial-setup-environment.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas. Windows-specific tools (such as winget for kubectl installation) are used without Linux alternatives, and file path examples consistently use Windows-style paths (e.g., C:\path\to\archive.zip). The Bash examples are often Windows-centric, using commands and patterns that are only valid on Windows systems. PowerShell is given equal or greater prominence compared to Bash, and Linux-native installation or extraction methods (such as apt, yum, or unzip) are missing. There is a lack of explicit Linux instructions for common tasks, and the documentation assumes a Windows environment throughout.

Recommendations

Provide Linux-specific installation instructions for kubectl (e.g., using curl or package managers like apt/yum).
Replace or supplement Windows file path examples with Linux-style paths (e.g., /home/user/archive.zip).
Include Linux-native commands for extracting ZIP files (e.g., unzip workload-orchestration-files.zip -d /path/to/workspace).
Clarify that Bash instructions are valid for both Windows (WSL/Git Bash) and Linux, and provide platform-specific notes where necessary.
Add troubleshooting notes for common Linux issues (e.g., permissions, package dependencies).
Ensure that onboarding scripts and referenced resources are cross-platform or provide separate scripts for Linux and Windows.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Onboarding Scripts for Workload Orchestration ...azure-arc/workload-orchestration/onboarding-scripts.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a strong Windows bias. All script examples and instructions are provided exclusively for PowerShell, with no mention of Bash, shell, or Linux equivalents. Windows-specific tools like 'winget' are used for installation steps, and the user is repeatedly instructed to open a PowerShell terminal. There are no Linux or cross-platform onboarding script examples, nor any guidance for users on non-Windows systems.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Bash or shell script examples for Linux/macOS users, including instructions for running onboarding scripts in those environments.
Replace or supplement 'winget' installation commands with cross-platform alternatives (e.g., apt, yum, brew, or direct download instructions).
Clarify whether the onboarding scripts (.ps1) can be run with PowerShell Core on Linux/macOS, and provide guidance for those platforms.
Add explicit sections or notes for Linux/macOS users, including prerequisites, installation steps, and troubleshooting tips.
Ensure all examples and instructions are presented in a platform-neutral way, or at least offer both Windows and Linux/macOS options side-by-side.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Role Based Access Control (RBAC) Guide for Workload Orchestration ...rticles/azure-arc/workload-orchestration/rbac-guide.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page focuses exclusively on Azure RBAC concepts and role assignments, referencing Azure portal and CLI access but does not provide any examples or guidance for Linux environments or tools. There are no Linux-specific instructions, CLI commands, or parity with Linux-native management patterns. The only CLI references are implicitly Azure CLI, which is cross-platform but not explicitly clarified, and there is no mention of Linux shell usage, nor are Linux tools or workflows described. Windows-centric terms (e.g., Azure portal, Resource Group) are used throughout, with no Linux-first or Linux-equivalent alternatives provided.

Recommendations

Add explicit examples of using Azure CLI on Linux, including bash/zsh shell commands and environment setup.
Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide installation instructions for Linux.
Include Linux-native RBAC management patterns, such as scripting with bash or using automation tools like Ansible.
Provide parity in user scenarios for Linux administrators, e.g., managing RBAC via Linux terminal, integrating with Linux authentication systems.
Reference Linux tools or workflows where appropriate, and avoid assuming Windows/Azure portal as the default management interface.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Release Notes for Workload Orchestration ...cles/azure-arc/workload-orchestration/release-notes.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily through the exclusive use of PowerShell syntax in CLI examples (notably in the May 2025 release), and the absence of Linux/bash equivalents for those commands. While Azure CLI is cross-platform, the documentation assumes a Windows environment by default in some examples, and does not provide Linux-specific guidance or examples. There is also a tendency to present Windows-oriented tooling (PowerShell) before or instead of Linux alternatives.

Recommendations

Provide Linux/bash equivalents for all CLI examples, especially where PowerShell syntax is used (e.g., replace backticks with backslashes for line continuation, use $VARIABLE or export for environment variables).
Explicitly state that Azure CLI commands work on both Windows and Linux, and show examples for both platforms where syntax differs.
Avoid using only PowerShell-specific syntax in documentation; use platform-neutral command formats where possible.
Include notes or sections on Linux prerequisites, troubleshooting, and environment setup to ensure parity.
Review all examples and ensure that Linux users are equally supported and not required to adapt Windows-centric instructions.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Troubleshooting for Workload Orchestration ...es/azure-arc/workload-orchestration/troubleshooting.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias, particularly in the troubleshooting sections for workload orchestration. Most command-line examples are provided exclusively in PowerShell syntax, even for cross-platform tools like Azure CLI, Docker, and kubectl, which are commonly used on Linux. Windows-specific patterns (e.g., PowerShell variable syntax, ConvertTo-Json, Out-File, [Convert]::ToBase64String) are used throughout, with no equivalent Bash or Linux shell examples for the majority of troubleshooting steps. Only in the 'Troubleshoot service groups' section are both Bash and PowerShell examples provided, but elsewhere Linux users are left to adapt Windows-centric instructions themselves.

Recommendations

Provide Bash/Linux shell equivalents for all command-line examples, especially for Azure CLI, Docker, and kubectl commands.
Avoid using PowerShell-specific constructs (such as Out-File, ConvertTo-Json, [Convert]::ToBase64String) without offering cross-platform alternatives (e.g., jq, base64, echo/redirection).
When presenting commands, use tabs or side-by-side formatting to show both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux (Bash) versions.
Review and update file encoding instructions to mention Linux editors and tools (e.g., iconv, nano, vim) alongside Windows options.
Explicitly state cross-platform compatibility for all tools and commands, and highlight any OS-specific differences in usage or output.

Create Pull Request

Azure Portal Create an Azure portal dashboard by using a Bicep file .../blob/main/articles/azure-portal/quick-create-bicep.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation exhibits Windows bias by exclusively deploying a Windows VM ('SimpleWinVM'), referencing Windows-specific username/password requirements, and linking only to Windows VM documentation. There are no examples or guidance for deploying a Linux VM, nor are Linux-specific requirements or dashboard scenarios mentioned. While both Azure CLI and PowerShell are shown, the VM and supporting documentation are Windows-centric.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent examples for deploying a Linux VM (e.g., Ubuntu) and update the Bicep/ARM template to allow choosing between Windows and Linux.
Include links to Linux VM documentation for username and password requirements.
Add a section or tab showing how to visualize Linux VM performance in the dashboard.
Ensure that variable names and resource group names are OS-neutral (e.g., 'SimpleVmResourceGroup' instead of 'SimpleWinVmResourceGroup').
Clarify in the prerequisites and deployment steps that both Windows and Linux VMs are supported, and provide parameter options for each.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Manage Public Content in Private Container Registry ...icles/container-registry/buffer-gate-public-content.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for importing images into Azure Container Registry, but the PowerShell example is given equal prominence and detail as the CLI example. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) examples, nor is there mention of Linux-native tools or workflows outside of Azure CLI. The documentation refers to Azure PowerShell as a primary tool, which is Windows-centric, and does not provide parity for Linux users who may prefer bash or other shell environments. The ordering of examples (CLI first, then PowerShell) is neutral, but the lack of Linux-specific guidance and the focus on PowerShell can be considered a Windows bias.

Recommendations

Add explicit bash shell examples for Linux users, especially for common workflows like importing images.
Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide examples of running CLI commands in Linux/macOS terminals.
Mention Linux-native tools (e.g., curl, podman, skopeo) where relevant, or explain how they can be used with Azure Container Registry.
Reduce emphasis on PowerShell as a primary tool, or balance with Linux-native alternatives.
Include troubleshooting or authentication guidance specific to Linux environments (e.g., credential storage, environment variables).

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Quickstart - Create Registry - Bicep ...ainer-registry/container-registry-get-started-bicep.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by mentioning PowerShell and the integrated Visual Studio Code terminal before Linux alternatives, providing explicit PowerShell examples, and lacking explicit Linux shell (bash) examples. The Azure CLI example is present, but there is no mention of Linux-specific shell usage or guidance for Linux users. The instructions for opening terminals and deleting resources are oriented toward Windows/GUI workflows.

Recommendations

Add explicit bash/Linux shell examples alongside PowerShell, including instructions for opening a terminal on Linux/macOS.
Mention Linux and macOS environments in the prerequisites and deployment steps, clarifying that Azure CLI works cross-platform.
Provide guidance for deleting resources using Azure CLI or bash, not just via the Azure portal.
Avoid Windows-centric language such as 'open PowerShell' or 'integrated Visual Studio Code terminal' without mentioning Linux/macOS equivalents.
Ensure parity in tool recommendations (e.g., suggest VS Code on Linux/macOS, or other editors commonly used on those platforms).

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Azure Container Registry Authentication Options Explained ...ontainer-registry/container-registry-authentication.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently presenting Azure PowerShell examples alongside or immediately after Azure CLI examples, with no equivalent Linux shell or Bash scripting examples for key authentication flows. Windows-specific tools (PowerShell) are given parity with the cross-platform Azure CLI, but Linux-native patterns (e.g., Bash, shell scripting) are not shown. The 'Next steps' section also highlights PowerShell and CLI, omitting Linux/Bash walkthroughs. While there is mention of using 'podman' as an alternative to Docker (relevant for Linux), this is a minor section and does not address broader Linux usage patterns.

Recommendations

Add Bash shell scripting examples for all authentication flows, especially for service principal and admin account scenarios.
Include explicit Linux usage instructions (e.g., environment variable export, file paths, credential storage) where relevant.
Provide parity for Linux-native tools and workflows (e.g., using Bash with az CLI, integrating with systemd for unattended authentication).
In 'Next steps', add links to Linux/Bash getting started guides for Azure Container Registry.
Where PowerShell is mentioned, clarify its cross-platform availability, but also offer native Linux alternatives.
Ensure that examples and instructions do not assume Windows as the default environment.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Push & Pull Container Image using Azure Container Registry ...-registry/container-registry-get-started-docker-cli.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows-specific tools (Azure PowerShell) are presented in parallel with Azure CLI, but PowerShell examples are given equal prominence, despite being Windows-centric. The use of Visual Studio Code and its Docker extension is recommended, which is more commonly associated with Windows workflows. Keyboard shortcuts (Control+C) are described in a way that matches Windows conventions. There are no explicit Linux shell examples (e.g., bash, zsh), nor are Linux-specific authentication or removal workflows discussed. The order of presentation sometimes places Windows tools before Linux equivalents, and there is no mention of Linux-native alternatives to PowerShell.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux shell (bash/zsh) examples for authentication and image removal, including common Linux commands and workflows.
Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide sample commands in bash/zsh syntax.
Include Linux-specific notes for keyboard shortcuts (e.g., Ctrl+C is universal, but mention differences if any).
Mention Linux-native editors (such as Vim, Emacs, or GNOME Builder) as alternatives to Visual Studio Code.
Provide parity in tool recommendations, e.g., suggest Linux package managers for Docker installation, and reference Linux documentation for Docker Desktop.
Ensure that Linux options are presented before or alongside Windows options, not after.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Quickstart - Create Registry in Portal ...iner-registry/container-registry-get-started-portal.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell instructions for signing in to the registry, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and no Linux-specific shell examples (e.g., Bash) are provided. There is no mention of Linux-native tools or patterns for resource management, and the portal screenshots and instructions are generic, but the command-line sections lack explicit Linux parity. The Docker installation section does link to Linux, Mac, and Windows instructions, but the registry management examples are Windows/PowerShell-heavy and do not show Linux shell equivalents.

Recommendations

Add explicit Bash/Linux shell examples for registry login and resource management, alongside Azure CLI and PowerShell.
Clarify that Azure CLI commands work cross-platform and provide sample commands in Bash syntax.
Where PowerShell is mentioned, also mention Linux alternatives (e.g., Bash, zsh) and show how to perform equivalent tasks.
Ensure parity in command-line examples by including Linux-native instructions for all steps currently shown with PowerShell.
Consider adding a 'Linux' tab or section for each command-line step, showing how to accomplish the task in a Linux environment.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Error Reference for Registry Health Checks ...-registry/container-registry-health-error-reference.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias, particularly in the 'NOTARY_VERSION_ERROR' section, where Windows-specific instructions and paths (e.g., notary.exe, C:\ProgramFiles\Docker\Docker\resources\bin) are given in detail, while Linux and macOS instructions are less explicit. Additionally, references to 'system variables' and 'system environment variables' in multiple sections use Windows terminology without mentioning Linux equivalents (e.g., PATH). There are no explicit Linux or macOS command examples or paths, and the troubleshooting steps do not provide parity for non-Windows users.

Recommendations

For every mention of Windows-specific tools, paths, or environment variables, provide equivalent instructions for Linux and macOS (e.g., specify typical Linux/Mac paths, use 'PATH environment variable' terminology).
In sections like NOTARY_VERSION_ERROR, include explicit Linux/macOS installation and path instructions, not just a reference to downloading a binary.
When referring to adding executables to the system path, clarify the process for Linux (e.g., modifying ~/.bashrc or /usr/local/bin) and macOS.
Where possible, provide command-line examples for both Windows (cmd/PowerShell) and Linux/macOS (bash/zsh).
Review all troubleshooting steps to ensure they are platform-agnostic or provide platform-specific guidance for all major OSes.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Manage OCI Artifacts and Supply Chain Artifacts with ORAS ...ntainer-registry/container-registry-manage-artifact.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Linux/macOS and Windows examples for ORAS CLI commands, but Windows examples are consistently presented after Linux/macOS/WSL2, not before or exclusively. However, there is a mild Windows bias in the use of Windows-specific command syntax (e.g., .\oras.exe, ^ for line continuation) and explicit mention of Docker Desktop credential store, which is primarily a Windows tool. There is also a reliance on Azure CLI and Docker Desktop, both of which are cross-platform but have stronger adoption and integration on Windows. No Linux examples are missing, and Linux is not omitted in any scenario.

Recommendations

Ensure that Linux and Windows examples are presented with equal prominence, possibly side-by-side, and clarify any platform-specific differences.
Mention Linux credential store alternatives to Docker Desktop, such as using pass or other native credential helpers.
Explicitly note that all CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide troubleshooting tips for each OS.
Where Windows-specific tools or patterns are mentioned (e.g., Docker Desktop), provide equivalent Linux alternatives or links to relevant documentation.
Consider adding a table or section summarizing platform-specific setup steps and differences for authentication and environment configuration.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Import Container Images to ACR using Azure APIs ...container-registry/container-registry-import-images.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by consistently providing Azure PowerShell examples alongside Azure CLI, referencing Windows-specific images (e.g., Windows Server Core), and mentioning PowerShell commands and patterns throughout. There is a lack of explicit Linux shell examples (e.g., Bash), and no mention of Linux-specific tools or workflows. The ordering and prominence of PowerShell and Windows references may make the documentation less approachable for Linux users.

Recommendations

Add explicit Bash/Linux shell examples for all Azure CLI commands, showing usage in a typical Linux terminal environment.
Include notes or sections clarifying that Azure CLI commands work identically on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide OS-agnostic instructions where possible.
Balance examples by including both Windows and Linux container images (e.g., show an import of an Ubuntu or Alpine image alongside Windows Server Core).
Avoid referencing Windows-specific tools or patterns (such as PowerShell) before their Linux equivalents; if both are mentioned, alternate the order or present them in parallel.
Add troubleshooting and setup notes relevant to Linux environments (e.g., permissions, shell differences, package installation).

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Azure Container Registry SKU Features and Limits ...articles/container-registry/container-registry-skus.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page presents both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for key operations, but PowerShell is mentioned alongside CLI in most cases and sometimes given equal prominence. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) examples, nor is there mention of Linux-specific tools or workflows. The documentation refers to the Azure portal, which is cross-platform, but command-line examples do not show parity for Linux users (e.g., bash, zsh).

Recommendations

Add explicit bash or shell examples for Linux users alongside Azure CLI and PowerShell examples.
When listing command-line options, mention Azure CLI (cross-platform) first, then PowerShell, to avoid Windows-first bias.
Clarify that Azure CLI commands work natively on Linux/macOS and Windows, and provide sample shell commands where appropriate.
Include troubleshooting or usage notes relevant to Linux environments (e.g., common issues with Docker/Podman on Linux, file permissions, etc.).
Ensure that references to PowerShell are contextualized as primarily for Windows users, and highlight cross-platform alternatives.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Verify Container Images in GitHub Workflows with Notation and Trusted Signing ...gistry-tutorial-github-verify-notation-trusted-signing.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation consistently provides both Linux (bash) and Windows (PowerShell) examples side-by-side, but Windows/PowerShell commands are always present and sometimes more verbose. Windows-specific tooling (PowerShell, Invoke-WebRequest, New-Item) is used, and Windows examples are given equal prominence to Linux, sometimes with more detailed instructions (e.g., directory creation). There is a slight tendency to mention Windows tools and patterns, such as PowerShell scripting, even when Linux equivalents are simpler. However, Linux parity is generally maintained, and the workflow itself runs on Ubuntu by default.

Recommendations

Ensure Linux examples are always as detailed as Windows ones, especially for tasks like directory creation.
Consider listing Linux (bash) examples before Windows (PowerShell) ones to reflect the default Ubuntu runner in GitHub Actions.
Where possible, use cross-platform commands (e.g., 'mkdir' instead of PowerShell's 'New-Item') in examples, or note cross-platform alternatives.
Add notes clarifying when commands are platform-specific and recommend using the default Ubuntu runner unless Windows is required.
Review for any subtle differences in instructions or outcomes between Linux and Windows examples and harmonize them.

Create Pull Request

Copilot Azure Copilot capabilities ...gement-docs/blob/main/articles/copilot/capabilities.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates mild Windows bias. Script generation examples mention Azure CLI, PowerShell, Terraform, and Bicep, but PowerShell is listed before Terraform/Bicep and is called out specifically. Troubleshooting examples reference Power BI (a Windows-centric tool), and there is no explicit mention of Linux shell (bash) or Linux-native tools. There are no Linux-specific examples, and Windows tools/patterns (PowerShell, Power BI) are referenced without Linux equivalents.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux/bash script generation examples alongside PowerShell.
Mention Linux-native tools (e.g., Bash, curl, jq) when discussing automation and troubleshooting.
Ensure parity in examples by including both Windows and Linux scenarios (e.g., troubleshooting from Linux clients, using Linux monitoring tools).
When listing script generation capabilities, alternate or randomize the order of PowerShell and Linux tools, or group them together as 'scripting languages' to avoid Windows-first impression.
Reference cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, Terraform) before platform-specific ones.
Include troubleshooting examples relevant to Linux environments (e.g., SSH connectivity, Linux VM diagnostics).

Create Pull Request

Copilot Use Azure Copilot with AI Shell ...t-docs/blob/main/articles/copilot/ai-shell-overview.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias by focusing on PowerShell and its module (AIShell), referencing only PowerShell-based installation and usage, and omitting explicit Linux shell (bash/zsh) examples or instructions. The links and repository references are PowerShell-centric, and there is no mention of Linux-specific tools, installation steps, or command-line environments. Azure CLI is mentioned, but only in conjunction with PowerShell, and no Linux-first or cross-platform parity is demonstrated.

Recommendations

Add explicit bash/zsh examples alongside PowerShell examples for command generation and troubleshooting.
Include installation instructions for AI Shell on Linux and macOS, detailing any differences or requirements.
Reference Linux shell environments (e.g., bash, zsh) and provide parity in usage scenarios.
Link to cross-platform documentation, not just PowerShell-specific pages and repositories.
Clarify that AI Shell works in multiple terminal environments and provide guidance for non-Windows users.

Create Pull Request

Copilot Example prompts for Azure Copilot ...ent-docs/blob/main/articles/copilot/example-prompts.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation provides example prompts for both Azure CLI and PowerShell, but PowerShell is presented as a distinct scenario, and there are multiple PowerShell-specific examples. The CLI examples do not specify Linux or Bash, and PowerShell is a Windows-centric tool, which may suggest a Windows-first approach. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) or cross-platform scripting examples, and Windows tools (PowerShell) are mentioned separately and in detail. The only explicit Linux reference is in the prompt about creating a Linux VM and SSHing into it, but there are no Linux shell scripting or management examples.

Recommendations

Add example prompts for managing Azure resources using Bash or other Linux-native tools.
Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide prompts/examples for both Windows (PowerShell) and Linux (Bash) environments.
Include Linux-specific scenarios, such as using SSH, managing resources with Bash scripts, or troubleshooting with Linux tools.
Ensure parity by providing equivalent examples for both PowerShell and Bash where applicable.
Avoid presenting Windows tools (PowerShell) before or in isolation from Linux equivalents.

Create Pull Request

Copilot Optimization agent capabilities in Agents (preview) in Azure Copilot ...-docs/blob/main/articles/copilot/optimization-agent.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by explicitly mentioning PowerShell script generation for optimization tasks and listing PowerShell before Azure CLI. There are no examples or references to Linux-specific tools, shell environments, or script formats (e.g., Bash). The sample prompts and instructions focus on PowerShell and CLI, with PowerShell mentioned first and no Linux-specific guidance provided.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Bash script examples alongside PowerShell, especially for optimization tasks.
Mention Linux shell environments (e.g., Bash, Zsh) when discussing script generation and execution.
Ensure sample prompts include requests for Bash scripts, not just PowerShell and generic CLI.
Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide usage notes for Linux users.
Avoid listing PowerShell before CLI or Bash unless contextually justified; alternate order or group together.
Add a note or section for Linux users on how to apply recommendations and run scripts in their environment.

Create Pull Request

Lighthouse Azure Lighthouse architecture ...blob/main/articles/lighthouse/concepts/architecture.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by primarily referencing Azure PowerShell for resource creation and management tasks, mentioning PowerShell cmdlets before Azure CLI, and lacking explicit Linux-oriented examples or guidance. The instructions and examples are tailored to users familiar with Windows tools, with no parity for Linux shell commands or workflows.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Azure CLI examples alongside PowerShell instructions, especially for resource creation and management tasks.
Explicitly mention that Azure CLI can be used on Linux and macOS, and provide sample commands for those platforms.
Ensure that references to management tools do not prioritize Windows tools; present CLI and PowerShell options together.
Add a section or tip for Linux/macOS users, highlighting cross-platform support and any platform-specific considerations.

Create Pull Request

Lighthouse Cross-tenant management experiences ...hthouse/concepts/cross-tenant-management-experience.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. In the 'APIs and management tool support' section, Azure PowerShell is mentioned before Azure CLI, and the only explicit command example given is for PowerShell (Get-AzSubscription), with the CLI example following. No Linux-specific tools or examples are provided, and there is no mention of Bash or shell scripting. The documentation refers to 'Windows Server or Linux machines' in Azure Arc, but does not provide parity in examples or instructions for Linux environments. No Linux-specific troubleshooting or management patterns are discussed.

Recommendations

Provide Linux/Bash command examples alongside or before PowerShell examples, especially for common tasks.
Include references to Linux-native tools (e.g., Bash, SSH, cloud-init) where relevant.
Ensure that management tool sections mention cross-platform compatibility and highlight Linux usage patterns.
Add troubleshooting and automation examples for Linux VMs, not just Windows.
Explicitly state when instructions or features apply equally to Linux and Windows, or note any differences.

Create Pull Request

Lighthouse Monitor delegated resources at scale ...ob/main/articles/lighthouse/how-to/monitor-at-scale.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for resource provider registration, mentioning PowerShell as a primary automation tool, and omitting equivalent Linux/CLI instructions. There are no Bash, Azure CLI, or cross-platform automation examples, and PowerShell is referenced before any other tool, reinforcing a Windows-centric approach.

Recommendations

Include Azure CLI (az) examples alongside PowerShell for resource provider registration and other automation tasks.
Provide Bash script equivalents for common operations, especially those relevant to Linux users.
Explicitly mention cross-platform options for automation accounts and scripting, clarifying that PowerShell Core and Azure CLI are available on Linux and macOS.
Reorder examples or provide parallel instructions so that Windows and Linux approaches are presented with equal prominence.
Add notes or links to documentation for using Azure Monitor and Log Analytics from Linux environments.

Create Pull Request

Lighthouse Monitor delegation changes in your managing tenant ...ticles/lighthouse/how-to/monitor-delegation-changes.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing detailed PowerShell scripts for querying delegation changes, referencing PowerShell first in code examples, and not offering equivalent Linux/bash scripting examples. While Azure CLI is briefly mentioned for role assignment, the main workflow and automation are shown only in PowerShell, which is primarily a Windows tool. There are no bash, shell, or Python examples for Linux users, and the sample script for querying activity logs is exclusively in PowerShell.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent bash or Python scripts for querying delegation changes using REST API calls, suitable for Linux environments.
Include Azure CLI examples for all major operations, especially for querying activity logs, not just for role assignment.
Present code samples in a cross-platform manner, e.g., side-by-side PowerShell and bash/Python examples.
Explicitly mention that PowerShell Core is available on Linux/macOS, or clarify platform requirements for scripts.
Reference Linux tools and patterns where appropriate, such as using curl, jq, or az CLI for automation.

Create Pull Request

Lighthouse Onboard all subscriptions in a management group ...articles/lighthouse/how-to/onboard-management-group.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation provides only a PowerShell example for assigning the policy at the management group level, with no equivalent example for Azure CLI, Bash, or other cross-platform tools. This creates a bias toward Windows users and may hinder Linux or macOS users who prefer or require non-PowerShell solutions. Additionally, the PowerShell example is presented as the primary (and only) automation method, reinforcing a Windows-first approach.

Recommendations

Add equivalent Azure CLI examples for all PowerShell scripts shown, especially for policy assignment and deployment steps.
Explicitly mention that both PowerShell and Azure CLI can be used for these operations, and provide links to relevant Azure CLI documentation.
Consider including Bash script examples or instructions for use in Linux/macOS environments.
Where possible, use cross-platform terminology and avoid implying that PowerShell is the default or only automation tool.
Add a table or section comparing PowerShell and Azure CLI commands for common tasks in the onboarding process.

Create Pull Request

Lighthouse Onboard a customer to Azure Lighthouse ...ob/main/articles/lighthouse/how-to/onboard-customer.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 3 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. While it does provide both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for deployment and confirmation steps, PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is given equal prominence to Azure CLI, and is not clearly marked as cross-platform. Additionally, references to using the Azure portal (which is platform-agnostic but often associated with Windows workflows) are frequent. There is no mention of Linux-specific shell scripting, nor are there examples using Bash or other Linux-native tools. The troubleshooting and process steps do not address Linux-specific considerations, and PowerShell is presented as a primary automation option without clarifying its cross-platform support.

Recommendations

Explicitly mention that Azure CLI and PowerShell are available on Linux and macOS, and provide guidance for installing and using them on those platforms.
Add Bash shell script examples for deployment and confirmation steps, especially for users who prefer native Linux tools.
Clarify that Azure PowerShell is cross-platform, and provide links or instructions for installing it on Linux.
Include troubleshooting tips relevant to Linux environments, such as file permissions or shell differences.
Ensure that references to the Azure portal do not imply a Windows-only experience, and mention browser compatibility on Linux.
Consider adding a section comparing automation options for Windows and Linux users, highlighting parity and differences.

Create Pull Request

Lighthouse Deploy Azure Policy to delegated subscriptions at scale ...lob/main/articles/lighthouse/how-to/policy-at-scale.md

High Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 4 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation exclusively uses PowerShell for all examples and instructions, which is primarily a Windows-centric tool. There are no examples using Bash, Azure CLI, or other cross-platform tools, nor is there any mention of Linux or macOS workflows. The use of PowerShell cmdlets and patterns (e.g., Select-AzSubscription, New-AzSubscriptionDeployment) reinforces a Windows-first approach and may alienate users on Linux or macOS who prefer Bash or Azure CLI.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent examples using Azure CLI (az commands) and Bash scripts alongside PowerShell examples.
Explicitly mention that the process can be performed on Linux/macOS and link to relevant cross-platform tooling.
Add a section comparing PowerShell and Azure CLI approaches for deploying policies at scale.
Avoid assuming PowerShell as the default and clarify prerequisites for each platform.
Reference documentation for installing and using Azure CLI on Linux/macOS.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc CLI reference for `azcmagent extension` ...main/articles/azure-arc/servers/azcmagent-extension.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation demonstrates Windows bias by listing Windows service management commands (Stop-Service/Start-Service) before their Linux equivalents (systemctl stop/start), and by referencing a Windows-specific extension ('AzureMonitorWindowsAgent') in the example for removing an extension. No Linux-specific extension examples are provided, and Windows tools/patterns are mentioned first in service management instructions.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux service management instructions, or present them side-by-side.
Provide Linux-specific extension examples (e.g., removing 'AzureMonitorLinuxAgent') alongside Windows examples.
Explicitly state cross-platform applicability in examples and command usage.
Where possible, use generic extension names or provide both Windows and Linux extension names in examples.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc CLI reference for `azcmagent disconnect` ...ain/articles/azure-arc/servers/azcmagent-disconnect.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias by presenting Windows-specific authentication options first and referencing PowerShell tools (Get-AzAccessToken) for access token retrieval without mentioning Linux equivalents. The interactive browser login is described as 'Windows only' and is discussed before Linux-default methods. No Linux-specific tools or shell examples are provided for access token retrieval.

Recommendations

Present authentication options in a platform-neutral order, or explicitly alternate between Windows and Linux-first approaches.
For access token retrieval, mention cross-platform methods (e.g., Azure CLI's 'az account get-access-token') alongside PowerShell.
Include Linux-specific notes or examples where appropriate, such as shell commands or authentication flows.
Clarify which authentication options are available on Linux and provide parity in documentation for both platforms.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Configure OneLake Identity for Cloud subvolumes .../container-storage/howto-configure-onelake-identity.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates a Windows-first bias by referencing Power BI web links and portals, which are more commonly associated with Windows environments. There are no explicit Linux or cross-platform CLI examples, nor is there mention of Linux-specific tools or workflows. The configuration steps focus on GUI navigation and do not provide command-line alternatives that would be more familiar to Linux users.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent Linux CLI examples (e.g., using Azure CLI, kubectl, or REST API) for configuring OneLake Identity and subvolumes.
Include instructions for accessing and managing OneLake workspaces from Linux environments, avoiding reliance on Windows-centric portals.
Mention cross-platform tools and patterns, such as scripting with Bash or using open-source clients, to ensure parity for Linux administrators.
Add screenshots or walkthroughs for Linux-based workflows where applicable.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Deploy a new SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc using Kubernetes tools ...ate-sql-managed-instance-using-kubernetes-native-tools.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation shows mild Windows bias by presenting PowerShell as the first example for base64 encoding credentials, followed by Linux/macOS. Additionally, the example file path for kubectl uses a Windows-style path (C:\arc-data-services\sqlmi.yaml) rather than a Linux-style path, which may be less familiar to Linux users. However, Linux/macOS equivalents are provided, and most instructions are platform-neutral.

Recommendations

Present Linux/macOS CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell examples, especially for common tasks like base64 encoding.
Use platform-neutral file paths in examples (e.g., ./arc-data-services/sqlmi.yaml) or provide both Windows and Linux/macOS path formats.
Explicitly state that instructions apply equally to Windows, Linux, and macOS, and avoid implying Windows is the default platform.
Consider adding a table or section summarizing commands for all major platforms, ensuring parity and visibility.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Delete resources from Azure Arc-enabled data services ...main/articles/azure-arc/data/delete-azure-resources.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing the Azure portal (a GUI tool most commonly used on Windows) for resource deletion steps, and does not provide any Linux-specific examples or mention Linux-native tools. All command-line instructions use the Azure CLI, which is cross-platform, but there are no examples of using Linux shell commands (e.g., bash/kubectl) for resource deletion, nor is there any mention of Linux-specific workflows or considerations. The portal-based instructions are presented first, reinforcing a Windows-first approach.

Recommendations

Include examples using Linux shell commands (e.g., bash, kubectl) for deleting resources from Kubernetes clusters.
Explicitly mention that the Azure CLI commands work on both Windows and Linux, and provide sample commands for both environments.
Add instructions for deleting resources using Linux-native tools and workflows, such as using kubectl to delete namespaces or deployments.
Balance the ordering of examples so that Linux and Windows approaches are presented equally, or provide a dedicated section for Linux users.
Reference Linux desktop environments and terminal usage where appropriate, not just the Azure portal.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Connectivity modes and requirements ...docs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/data/connectivity.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page does not show overt Windows bias in terms of exclusive use of Windows tools or PowerShell, but there is a subtle bias in the ordering and emphasis: Azure portal, Azure CLI, and Azure Resource Manager APIs are mentioned first and most prominently, with Linux-native tools (kubectl, Helm, oc) listed later or as alternatives. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples or instructions, and no mention of Linux shell commands or workflows. The documentation assumes familiarity with Azure-centric tools, which are often more Windows-oriented, and does not provide parity for Linux users in terms of example commands or tool usage.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux shell (bash) examples alongside Azure CLI and portal instructions.
List Linux-native tools (kubectl, Helm, oc) before or alongside Azure tools when describing provisioning and management workflows.
Include example workflows for Linux environments, such as using bash scripts or Linux authentication mechanisms.
Clarify cross-platform compatibility for all tools mentioned (e.g., Azure Data Studio, Azure CLI) and note any OS-specific considerations.
Add a section or callout for Linux administrators, summarizing key steps and tools relevant to Linux environments.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Migrate a database from SQL Server to SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc ...articles/azure-arc/data/migrate-to-managed-instance.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias by consistently presenting Windows-specific paths (e.g., C:\Backupfiles\) and examples first, without providing equivalent Linux examples (e.g., /home/user/Backupfiles/). The instructions and code samples for backing up databases and copying files into pods use Windows file system conventions and do not mention or illustrate how to perform these steps on Linux systems. Additionally, tool usage (Azure Data Studio, Azure Storage Explorer) is described generically, but examples and screenshots (where referenced) are likely Windows-centric.

Recommendations

Provide parallel Linux examples for file paths and commands (e.g., show both C:\Backupfiles\test.bak and /home/user/Backupfiles/test.bak in backup and kubectl cp commands).
Explicitly mention Linux compatibility for all tools and steps, including installation and usage notes for Azure Data Studio and Azure Storage Explorer on Linux.
Add notes or sections clarifying any platform-specific differences, such as file permissions, path formats, or required dependencies on Linux.
Where screenshots or UI instructions are given, include Linux screenshots or clarify any differences in UI/UX between platforms.
Review and update all code samples to ensure Linux users can follow along without confusion or extra research.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Disaster recovery - SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc - portal ...-arc/data/managed-instance-disaster-recovery-portal.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation exclusively describes using the Azure portal (a web-based GUI) for configuring disaster recovery, without mentioning or providing examples for command-line or scripting approaches on either Windows or Linux. While the portal is cross-platform, the absence of Linux-specific considerations or CLI/script examples (which are often preferred in Linux environments) may implicitly favor Windows-style, GUI-centric workflows. Additionally, there are no references to Linux tools, shell commands, or patterns, and the only alternative mentioned is a separate CLI article, without summary or parity in this page.

Recommendations

Add brief examples or links for both PowerShell and Bash/Azure CLI workflows directly in this article, or summarize their availability and parity.
Explicitly state that the Azure portal is accessible from any OS/browser to clarify cross-platform compatibility.
Include a comparison table or section highlighting GUI vs. CLI approaches, with notes on OS compatibility.
If there are Linux-specific considerations (such as firewall rules, connectivity, or authentication differences), mention them.
Ensure that references to related content (such as the CLI article) are clearly labeled as cross-platform and indicate which OSes are supported.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Save costs with reserved capacity .../articles/azure-arc/data/reserved-capacity-overview.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily through its exclusive use of the Azure portal for instructions and references to PowerShell, with no Linux-specific examples or mention of Linux tools. The order of tool mentions places the Azure portal and PowerShell before Azure CLI and API, and there are no CLI command examples for Linux users. There is also a lack of explicit guidance for Linux administrators, which may hinder parity for cross-platform users.

Recommendations

Include step-by-step examples using Azure CLI for all major actions (e.g., purchasing, managing, and viewing reservations), as CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
Explicitly mention Linux compatibility for all management options, clarifying that Azure CLI and REST API can be used from Linux systems.
Provide sample scripts or command lines for reservation management using Azure CLI and REST API, alongside PowerShell examples if present.
Ensure that tool references (portal, PowerShell, CLI, API) are presented in a neutral order or grouped together, rather than prioritizing Windows-centric tools.
Add a section or note for Linux users, highlighting best practices and available tooling for managing Azure Arc SQL Managed Instance reservations.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Data collection and reporting | Azure Arc-enabled data services ...zure-arc/data/privacy-data-collection-and-reporting.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias primarily in the billing data section, where the only explicit operating system example given is Windows ("osType": "Windows"). There are no Linux or cross-platform examples for SQL Server inventory or billing data, nor are Linux-specific patterns or tools mentioned. The documentation does not provide parity in examples or guidance for Linux environments, despite Azure Arc-enabled data services supporting Linux-based clusters and SQL Server on Linux.

Recommendations

Include explicit Linux examples in billing and inventory data sections, such as 'osType': 'Linux' and relevant Linux server properties.
Add notes or examples for SQL Server running on Linux, including differences in data collection, reporting, and diagnostic data.
Ensure that any references to operating system properties or host types mention both Windows and Linux, or clarify cross-platform applicability.
Where tools or commands are referenced (e.g., kubectl), provide guidance for both Windows and Linux environments, including shell and scripting differences if relevant.
Review all JSON examples to ensure they are not exclusively Windows-centric and provide Linux variants where appropriate.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Rotate user-provided TLS certificate in indirectly connected SQL Managed Instance enabled by Azure Arc ...articles/azure-arc/data/rotate-user-tls-certificate.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation provides both Linux and Windows instructions for base64 encoding, but the Windows-specific tool (certutil) is mentioned separately and in detail, including extra steps for output cleanup. The Linux method is presented first, but the Windows method receives more explanation and troubleshooting. No PowerShell examples are present, and the majority of commands (openssl, kubectl, az CLI) are cross-platform. However, Windows users are given additional guidance, which may suggest a slight Windows bias in tooling support.

Recommendations

Provide equivalent troubleshooting and cleanup steps for Linux base64 output, if needed, to match the detail given for Windows.
Mention alternative Linux tools for base64 encoding/decoding (e.g., openssl base64, xxd) to match the Windows certutil coverage.
Clarify that all CLI commands (az, kubectl, openssl) work on both Windows and Linux, and provide explicit cross-platform notes where relevant.
If additional Windows-specific steps are given, ensure Linux/macOS equivalents are also described for parity.
Consider grouping base64 encoding instructions together, with clear cross-platform alternatives, rather than separating Windows and Linux.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Get logs to troubleshoot Azure Arc-enabled data services ...in/articles/azure-arc/data/troubleshooting-get-logs.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides a CLI example that uses a Windows-style path (C:\temp\logs) for the --target-folder parameter, but does not offer a Linux equivalent (such as /tmp/logs). No Linux/macOS-specific examples or notes are given, which may confuse non-Windows users. The documentation does not mention PowerShell or Windows-only tools, but the example pathing is Windows-centric.

Recommendations

Add Linux/macOS path examples (e.g., /tmp/logs) alongside Windows paths for the --target-folder parameter.
Explicitly state that the CLI commands work on both Windows and Linux/macOS, and clarify any OS-specific behaviors.
Where file paths are referenced, provide both Windows and Linux/macOS formats, or use a generic placeholder (e.g., <desired folder>) with a note about OS differences.
Consider including screenshots or output samples from both Windows and Linux environments to improve parity.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Storage configuration .../main/articles/azure-arc/data/storage-configuration.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows/Azure bias by primarily using Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) examples and storage classes, mentioning Azure-specific tools and patterns first and in greater detail than their AWS and GCP equivalents. There are no explicit PowerShell or Windows-only command examples, but the focus on Azure (Microsoft's cloud) and its storage classes, as well as references to Azure CLI, may disadvantage Linux-centric or non-Azure users. Linux-specific storage patterns (e.g., NFS, local volumes) are mentioned but not exemplified, and alternative cloud providers are covered only briefly and after Azure.

Recommendations

Provide example storage class configurations for popular Linux distributions and on-premises Kubernetes clusters, not just AKS.
Include explicit examples using Linux-native tools (e.g., shell scripts, kubectl from Linux terminals) alongside Azure CLI.
Offer parity in detail and examples for AWS EKS and GCP GKE, including their storage class creation and management workflows.
Add more guidance and examples for NFS and other Linux-centric storage solutions, including configuration steps.
Avoid referencing Azure-specific features or templates before more general Kubernetes concepts, or provide equal coverage for other platforms.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Upload logs to Azure Monitor ...-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/data/upload-logs.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides environment variable examples for Windows (CMD), PowerShell, and Linux/macOS, but consistently lists Windows and PowerShell examples before Linux/macOS. This ordering may subtly prioritize Windows users. There is also a slight emphasis on Windows scripting (mentioning .cmd, .bat, .ps1) before Linux equivalents (.sh), and Windows Task Scheduler is mentioned before cron in automation suggestions. However, Linux examples are present and functional throughout.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of platform examples, sometimes listing Linux/macOS first.
Provide equal detail and prominence to Linux/macOS tools (e.g., mention cron before Windows Task Scheduler, or side-by-side).
Include bash or shell script examples before or alongside Windows batch/PowerShell scripts.
Consider grouping platform-specific instructions together or using tabs, rather than always listing Windows first.
Explicitly state that all platforms are equally supported at the beginning of the documentation.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc-enabled data services validation ...lob/main/articles/azure-arc/data/validation-program.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page shows mild Windows bias, primarily through the inclusion of Windows-centric partner solutions (e.g., Azure Stack HCI, AKS-HCI) and tools (Azure Data Studio, azdata CLI) that are most commonly used on Windows. Windows-based Kubernetes solutions are listed before Linux-based equivalents in some partner sections (e.g., Hitachi UCP with Microsoft AKS-HCI before Red Hat OpenShift). However, the page does include Linux-compatible distributions (Red Hat OpenShift, Kublr, VMware, Wind River) and does not provide command-line examples that are exclusive to Windows or PowerShell.

Recommendations

Explicitly mention Linux compatibility for all listed tools (e.g., azdata CLI, Azure Data Studio) and provide installation links for both Windows and Linux.
Ensure partner solutions are grouped or ordered in a way that does not prioritize Windows-based solutions over Linux-based ones.
Add example workflows or validation steps using Linux-native tools and environments (e.g., bash, Linux package managers) alongside any Windows-specific instructions.
Clarify platform support in the prerequisites section, including how to generate and use Kubernetes config files on both Windows and Linux.
If possible, add references to Linux-specific distributions or community Kubernetes solutions to further balance the partner list.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Upload usage data to Azure ...blob/main/articles/azure-arc/data/upload-usage-data.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ linux_first

Summary

The documentation provides automation examples using Linux shell scripting and mentions Linux/Mac script extensions before Windows equivalents. Windows automation tools (Task Scheduler, .cmd/.bat/.ps1) are referenced, but only after Linux options. There are no PowerShell-specific examples or Windows-first command patterns. The primary command-line examples use Azure CLI, which is cross-platform. Overall, the page leans slightly toward Linux in example ordering and scripting, but does mention Windows tools for parity.

Recommendations

Add explicit PowerShell script examples for automating uploads on Windows.
Provide step-by-step instructions for using Windows Task Scheduler to run the upload script.
Include notes on running Azure CLI commands in Windows environments (e.g., using Command Prompt, PowerShell).
Ensure that both Linux and Windows automation options are presented with equal detail and prominence.
Consider adding screenshots or walkthroughs for both Linux cron and Windows Task Scheduler setups.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Monitor Edge RAG Preview ...blob/main/articles/azure-arc/edge-rag/observability.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows/Azure-centric bias by exclusively providing instructions and screenshots for the Azure portal and Azure Managed Grafana interfaces, without offering any Linux-native or cross-platform CLI examples (such as kubectl, bash, or Linux monitoring tools). The workflow assumes users interact primarily with Azure's graphical tools, which are most commonly accessed from Windows environments, and does not mention or prioritize Linux-native approaches for monitoring Edge RAG metrics.

Recommendations

Add Linux-native examples for monitoring Edge RAG metrics, such as using kubectl, Prometheus, or bash scripts.
Include CLI instructions (e.g., Azure CLI, kubectl) alongside or before GUI-based steps to ensure parity for Linux users.
Reference open-source monitoring tools (e.g., Prometheus, Grafana on Linux) and provide setup instructions for non-Azure environments.
Ensure screenshots and walkthroughs are not exclusively from Windows-based Azure portal interfaces; consider including examples from Linux terminals or web-based tools.
Explicitly mention platform-agnostic steps and clarify any platform-specific requirements or limitations.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Quickstart: Install Edge RAG on Azure Kubernetes Service ...ain/articles/azure-arc/edge-rag/quickstart-edge-rag.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation demonstrates Windows bias primarily in the 'Connect to the developer portal' section, where instructions for updating the hosts file are given only for Windows (using Notepad and the Windows file path). There are no equivalent instructions for Linux or macOS users. Additionally, the mention of 'Switch to PowerShell' in Azure Cloud Shell is presented before any mention of Bash, and all variable assignment and command continuation examples use PowerShell-style syntax (e.g., `$var = ...`, backticks for line continuation), which may not work in Bash shells commonly used on Linux/macOS.

Recommendations

Add parallel instructions for updating the hosts file on Linux and macOS (e.g., using sudo and a text editor like nano or vim to edit /etc/hosts).
Include Bash shell examples for variable assignment and command continuation, or clarify which shell is being used in each example.
When referencing Azure Cloud Shell, mention Bash as an option and provide guidance for both PowerShell and Bash users.
Ensure all file paths and tool usage are cross-platform, or provide platform-specific instructions where necessary.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: "As a system administrator managing Azure Arc-enabled servers, I want to query and analyze the installation status of databases such as SQL Server, PostgreSQL, or MySQL, so that I can ensure compliance and optimize resource allocation." ...ticles/azure-arc/includes/azure-arc-enabled-servers.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides examples for Azure CLI, Azure PowerShell, and the Azure Portal for each query, but PowerShell is always presented as a primary tab alongside CLI, and there is no mention of Linux-specific shell usage (e.g., Bash) or Linux-native tools. The PowerShell examples may imply a Windows-centric workflow, and there is no explicit guidance or parity for Linux users beyond the CLI, which is cross-platform but not highlighted as such.

Recommendations

Explicitly state that Azure CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide Bash shell examples or notes for Linux users.
Add a 'Bash' or 'Linux shell' tab alongside PowerShell to demonstrate usage in a Linux environment, including any differences in escaping or command syntax.
Clarify that PowerShell is available cross-platform, but also mention that Linux users may prefer Bash or other shells.
Where relevant, discuss any OS-specific considerations (e.g., agent installation, file paths, environment variables) for both Windows and Linux.
Ensure that documentation language and examples do not assume a Windows-first audience, and highlight Linux parity where possible.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: "As a cloud administrator, I want to understand how to get the region segment of regional endpoints , so that I can configure Azure services in specific regions without errors." ...ob/main/articles/azure-arc/includes/arc-region-note.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for listing regions. However, the PowerShell example is given directly after the CLI example, and PowerShell is a Windows-centric tool, which may suggest a slight Windows bias. There are no Linux-specific shell examples (e.g., Bash, grep, jq), nor is there explicit mention of Linux tools or patterns.

Recommendations

Add a Bash example using Azure CLI, such as `az account list-locations --query "[].name" -o tsv`.
Clarify that Azure CLI works cross-platform and is recommended for Linux/macOS users.
If PowerShell is mentioned, note that it is available cross-platform, but most Linux users prefer Bash.
Consider listing the Azure CLI example first, as it is more universally applicable.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Troubleshoot extension issues for Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes clusters ...les/azure-arc/kubernetes/extensions-troubleshooting.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias. While most troubleshooting steps use cross-platform tools like Azure CLI, kubectl, and helm, the only OS-specific troubleshooting guidance is for Linux (Oracle Linux/RHEL 9.x) in the AMA section. However, the documentation consistently refers to Azure CLI (which is available on Windows, macOS, and Linux) and does not provide any PowerShell or Windows-specific examples. The only notable Windows bias is the use of Azure CLI commands, which are often presented as the primary method for troubleshooting Azure resources, and the lack of explicit Linux shell examples (e.g., bash scripting for automation). There are no Linux-first troubleshooting flows, and Windows tools (Azure CLI, juju, etc.) are mentioned before any Linux-native alternatives.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for common troubleshooting automation tasks, such as looping over resources or parsing output.
Where Azure CLI is used, clarify that it is cross-platform and provide alternative commands for users who prefer native Linux tools (e.g., kubectl, jq, grep, awk).
Include troubleshooting steps or examples for Linux-specific environments (such as SELinux, AppArmor, or systemd) where relevant.
If PowerShell or Windows-specific tools are mentioned, ensure Linux equivalents are provided and presented with equal prominence.
Consider adding a section or callout for Linux users highlighting any OS-specific considerations, especially for extension installation and resource management.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Resource Graph sample queries for Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes ...rticles/azure-arc/kubernetes/resource-graph-samples.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation mentions Azure PowerShell before Azure CLI when listing ways to run queries, which can suggest a Windows-first or PowerShell-heavy bias. There are no explicit Linux examples or references to Linux-specific tools or shell environments. The mention of Azure PowerShell and the lack of Bash or Linux terminal examples may make the documentation less approachable for Linux users.

Recommendations

List Azure CLI before Azure PowerShell when describing cross-platform options, as CLI is natively supported on both Windows and Linux.
Include explicit examples of running queries in Bash or Linux terminal environments.
Clarify that Azure CLI and Resource Graph Explorer are fully supported on Linux and macOS.
Add a note or section highlighting cross-platform compatibility and usage for Linux users.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc resource bridge maintenance operations ...main/articles/azure-arc/resource-bridge/maintenance.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ missing_linux_example ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation does not provide explicit examples or instructions for Linux environments. All command-line instructions reference the Azure CLI, but there are no examples of Linux-specific shell usage, nor is there any mention of Linux tools or patterns. The appliance VM credential update references VMware and SCVMM, both of which are commonly managed from Windows environments. There is no mention of Linux-based management workflows, nor are Linux shell commands or PowerShell alternatives discussed.

Recommendations

Include explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for CLI commands, demonstrating usage on Linux management machines.
Clarify whether the Azure CLI commands are cross-platform and provide any Linux-specific prerequisites or troubleshooting steps.
Mention Linux-compatible tools and workflows for managing the appliance VM, especially for credential updates and proxy configuration.
Add guidance for Linux administrators, such as how to automate maintenance tasks using cron or shell scripts.
Ensure parity in examples and instructions for both Windows and Linux environments, including any differences in file paths, environment variables, or authentication methods.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Arc resource bridge system requirements ...icles/azure-arc/resource-bridge/system-requirements.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page for Azure Arc resource bridge system requirements demonstrates Windows bias by referencing Azure CLI installation with a direct link to the Windows installation page and specifying 32-bit/64-bit requirements without clarifying Linux or macOS equivalents. There are no explicit Linux or macOS management machine examples, nor are there instructions or links for installing Azure CLI on those platforms. All CLI usage examples and requirements are presented generically, but the installation guidance is Windows-centric.

Recommendations

Provide explicit instructions and links for installing Azure CLI on Linux and macOS, alongside Windows.
Clarify whether the 32-bit/64-bit requirements apply to Linux/macOS, or provide platform-specific guidance.
Include example CLI commands run on Linux/macOS, or note any differences in usage or prerequisites.
Ensure that references to management machine requirements mention support for Linux and macOS, not just Windows.
Add parity in troubleshooting and credential update instructions for non-Windows platforms.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Programmatically deploy and manage Azure Arc Extended Security Updates licenses ...les/azure-arc/servers/api-extended-security-updates.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation is focused exclusively on managing Extended Security Updates licenses for Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2. All examples and API payloads reference Windows-specific targets, and there is no mention of Linux systems, Linux-specific license management, or examples for Linux servers. The customer intent and all command parameters are tailored to Windows environments, with no Linux parity or guidance.

Recommendations

Add examples and instructions for managing ESU licenses for Linux servers, if supported.
Clarify whether the APIs and Azure CLI commands can be used for Linux workloads, and provide Linux-specific parameter values or scenarios.
Include Linux-specific documentation sections or cross-references if the feature is Windows-only, to help users understand platform limitations.
If Linux is not supported, explicitly state this in the documentation to avoid confusion.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Resource Graph sample queries for Azure Arc ...blob/main/articles/azure-arc/resource-graph-samples.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation mentions Azure PowerShell as a primary method for running queries, which is a Windows-centric tool, and lists it before Azure CLI. There are no explicit examples or instructions for running queries on Linux systems, nor are Linux-specific tools or shell environments referenced. The documentation does not provide parity in guidance for Linux users.

Recommendations

Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide examples using bash or other common Linux shells.
Include instructions or examples for running queries in Linux environments, such as using Azure CLI in bash.
Avoid listing Windows-centric tools (like PowerShell) before cross-platform alternatives unless contextually justified.
Reference Linux-native tools or environments where appropriate, and clarify platform compatibility for each method.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Extensions security for Azure Arc-enabled servers ...main/articles/azure-arc/servers/security-extensions.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation generally provides parity between Windows and Linux, but there is a consistent pattern of presenting Windows examples and commands before Linux equivalents. In example sections, Windows (PowerShell) commands are listed first, and Linux commands follow. There is also a slight emphasis on Windows-specific terminology (e.g., 'elevated command console') and references to Windows contexts (Local System) before Linux (root). However, Linux examples are present and not omitted.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux examples, or present them side-by-side to avoid implicit prioritization.
Use neutral terminology when describing user contexts (e.g., 'administrator/root') rather than listing Windows first.
Ensure that all example commands are provided for both platforms, and avoid giving the impression that Windows is the default or primary environment.
Where possible, use platform-agnostic instructions before platform-specific details.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc How to organize and inventory servers using hierarchies, tagging, and reporting ...ticles/azure-arc/servers/organize-inventory-servers.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation describes organizing and inventorying servers using Azure Arc, hierarchies, tagging, and reporting. While it mentions support for both Windows and Linux, examples, tooling, and usage patterns are presented in a generic or Azure-centric way, with no platform-specific examples. However, where tools are mentioned (Azure CLI, PowerShell), Windows-centric tooling (PowerShell) is listed before Linux-friendly alternatives (CLI), and there are no explicit Linux command-line or shell examples. No Linux-specific patterns or tools are discussed.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux examples, such as Bash or shell commands for tagging and querying resources.
List Azure CLI before PowerShell when suggesting cross-platform tools, or clarify platform applicability for each tool.
Include examples or references for managing Linux servers (e.g., onboarding, tagging) with Linux-native tools or scripts.
Highlight any differences or considerations for Linux environments in Azure Arc workflows.
Add links to Linux-specific documentation or guides where relevant.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Data and privacy ...in/articles/azure-arc/servers/security-data-privacy.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation generally provides parity between Windows and Linux in log file locations and descriptions. However, there is evidence of Windows bias: in the section about retaining activity logs, the link specifically references PowerShell tabs, which are Windows-centric, and Windows log paths are consistently listed before Linux equivalents. There are no Linux-specific CLI or shell examples, and the documentation does not mention Linux-native tools or patterns for log management.

Recommendations

Provide Linux shell (bash) examples alongside or instead of PowerShell examples, especially for tasks like sending activity log data.
Alternate the order of Windows and Linux log path listings, or group them together to avoid implicit prioritization.
Include references to Linux-native tools (e.g., journalctl, tail, grep) for viewing or managing logs.
Ensure that documentation links and tabs include both PowerShell and Bash/CLI options where relevant.
Explicitly state that all features and troubleshooting steps apply equally to Linux and Windows, and highlight any differences.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure Resource Graph sample queries for Azure Arc-enabled servers ...n/articles/azure-arc/servers/resource-graph-samples.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page references running queries via Azure PowerShell, Azure CLI, and the Azure portal, but lists Azure PowerShell first and does not provide explicit Linux-specific examples or mention Linux-native tools. There is no discussion of Linux shell usage, nor are there examples tailored for Linux environments, which may suggest a subtle Windows-first bias and a lack of Linux parity.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for running Azure CLI commands.
Mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and can be used natively on Linux and macOS, not just Windows.
Include instructions or examples for running queries from Linux terminals, such as using bash scripts or integrating with Linux automation tools.
Avoid listing Windows-specific tools (e.g., PowerShell) before cross-platform alternatives unless contextually necessary.
Add a note clarifying platform compatibility for all tools mentioned.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Quickstart - Connect a Linux machine with Azure Arc-enabled servers (package-based installation) ...main/articles/azure-arc/servers/quick-onboard-linux.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_reference ⚠️ windows_terms

Summary

The documentation is focused on Linux onboarding and provides Linux-specific instructions and examples throughout. However, there are minor references to Windows terminology, such as mentioning 'Windows computer name' alongside Linux hostname in prerequisites, and using terms like 'Windows' in resource naming conventions. No Windows-specific tools, examples, or PowerShell commands are present, and Linux is clearly the primary platform for this guide.

Recommendations

Remove or clarify references to 'Windows computer name' in prerequisites to avoid confusion in a Linux-focused guide.
Ensure that all terminology and examples are strictly Linux-centric unless cross-platform considerations are necessary.
If mentioning reserved words or trademarks, provide Linux-specific context or examples.
Continue to avoid Windows/Powershell examples and tools in Linux-specific documentation to maintain platform parity.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Identity and authorization ...s/azure-arc/servers/security-identity-authorization.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools

Summary

The documentation generally presents Windows paths and group names before their Linux equivalents, and refers to Windows-specific concepts (such as 'Hybrid agent extension applications' group) before mentioning Linux ('himds'). File paths are listed with Windows first, and directory/group names are explained with a Windows-first approach. There are no command-line examples, but the overall pattern prioritizes Windows terminology and organization.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of Windows and Linux references, or present Linux examples first in some sections.
Provide parallel explanations for both platforms, ensuring equal prominence and clarity.
Where possible, use platform-neutral language before specifying OS-specific details.
Add explicit Linux group and file path explanations before or alongside Windows ones.
Include Linux-specific best practices or troubleshooting notes if Windows ones are present.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Customer intent: "As a system administrator managing Azure Arc-enabled servers, I want to understand the required endpoints for Extended Security Updates so that I can ensure proper connectivity and compliance during installation and updates." ...azure-arc/servers/includes/esu-network-requirements.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation focuses exclusively on Windows Server 2012 and SQL Server 2012, with all examples and endpoint descriptions tailored to Windows workloads. There are no references to Linux servers, Linux equivalents, or cross-platform considerations, and the installation package is specified as 'Windows installation package' without mention of Linux packages or endpoints.

Recommendations

Include information about Linux server support for Azure Arc-enabled servers, if applicable.
Provide endpoint requirements and examples for Linux workloads, including package download sources and update mechanisms.
Clarify whether Extended Security Updates are available for Linux servers, and if not, explicitly state this to avoid ambiguity.
If Linux is not supported for ESU, consider adding a note to inform users and guide them to relevant documentation for Linux scenarios.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Terraform based SCVMM VM management ...ter-virtual-machine-manager/terraform-vm-management.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively referencing SCVMM (a Windows-only virtualization manager) and using Windows-centric terminology (e.g., 'Administrator' as the default username). There are no examples or guidance for Linux-based SCVMM VMs, nor are Linux-specific patterns, usernames, or OS profiles mentioned. All sample configurations and instructions assume Windows environments, and there is no mention of Linux equivalents or considerations.

Recommendations

Include explicit examples for Linux-based SCVMM VMs, such as using a Linux username (e.g., 'ubuntu', 'root') and Linux OS profiles in Terraform templates.
Add notes or sections describing differences in provisioning Linux VMs via SCVMM, including required variables and configuration changes.
Provide sample Terraform code blocks for Linux VM creation and management, highlighting any required changes (e.g., SSH keys instead of passwords, Linux-specific settings).
Clarify whether SCVMM supports Linux VMs and, if so, document any prerequisites or limitations for Linux VM management.
Ensure that instructions and variable names do not assume Windows defaults (e.g., avoid only using 'Administrator' as the username).

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Set up and manage self-service access to SCVMM resources ...manager/set-up-and-manage-self-service-access-scvmm.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation is focused exclusively on SCVMM, a Windows-centric virtualization management tool, and provides instructions only for Azure portal GUI workflows. There are no Linux-specific examples, CLI commands, or references to Linux management tools or patterns. The documentation assumes a Windows/SCVMM environment and does not address Linux-based virtualization or cross-platform access scenarios.

Recommendations

Include equivalent instructions for managing access to Linux-based virtualization platforms (e.g., KVM, libvirt) if supported by Azure Arc.
Provide Azure CLI or PowerShell command examples for role assignments, and clarify cross-platform compatibility.
Add a section comparing SCVMM (Windows) and Linux virtualization management within Azure Arc, highlighting differences and parity.
Explicitly state platform limitations and suggest alternatives for Linux administrators where SCVMM is not applicable.
Ensure future documentation covers both GUI and CLI workflows, with notes on OS compatibility.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Enable VM extensions to Arc-enabled servers from the Azure portal ...icles/azure-arc/servers/manage-vm-extensions-portal.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page generally presents VM extension management in a platform-neutral way, focusing on the Azure portal. However, when providing configuration examples, it specifically mentions 'deploy the Azure Monitor agent for Windows by using a proxy' without offering a Linux equivalent. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples or references, and Windows is mentioned first in the context of extension configuration. This may subtly reinforce a Windows-centric perspective and leave Linux users without clear guidance for their scenarios.

Recommendations

Include explicit examples or notes for deploying extensions on Linux machines, especially where configuration steps differ from Windows.
When mentioning Windows-specific scenarios (e.g., proxy configuration for the Azure Monitor agent), also provide Linux equivalents or clarify if the steps are identical or different.
Ensure that references to platform-specific tools or patterns (such as PowerShell) are balanced with Linux alternatives (such as Bash or CLI commands), even in related content.
Review screenshots and illustrations to ensure they represent both Windows and Linux environments where applicable.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Multiple Solutions with a Single Shared Dependency at Different Levels ...oad-orchestration/tutorial-service-group-scenario-4.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for all steps, but PowerShell is given equal prominence and detail as Bash, which can indicate a Windows bias, especially since PowerShell is primarily a Windows shell (though cross-platform now). Additionally, in several places, PowerShell examples are presented before or alongside Bash, rather than Bash or Linux-native tools being prioritized. There are no Linux-specific tools or patterns (such as native Linux utilities, file paths, or shell scripting idioms) beyond Bash, and no mention of Linux desktop environments or distributions. The use of the Azure CLI and Helm is cross-platform, but the presence of PowerShell throughout may signal a bias toward Windows users.

Recommendations

Prioritize Bash examples and ensure they are presented first, as Bash is the default shell on most Linux systems.
Clearly state that all CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and highlight any platform-specific differences.
Limit PowerShell examples to a separate section or appendix, or provide them only where necessary for Windows-specific workflows.
Include Linux-specific troubleshooting tips or notes, such as file permissions, environment variables, or common Linux errors.
Reference Linux distributions (Ubuntu, CentOS, etc.) in prerequisites or validation steps where appropriate.
Use Linux-style file paths and conventions in examples unless Windows-specific paths are required.

Create Pull Request

Azure Portal Create an Azure portal dashboard with Azure CLI .../azure-portal/quickstart-portal-dashboard-azure-cli.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a bias towards Windows by exclusively providing a VM creation example using a Windows image ('win2016datacenter') and referencing Windows-specific username and password requirements. There are no examples or guidance for creating a Linux VM, nor are Linux-specific considerations mentioned. The documentation does not offer parity for Linux users in its examples or instructions.

Recommendations

Add a parallel example for creating a Linux VM (e.g., using '--image UbuntuLTS') with appropriate username and SSH key/password requirements.
Include links to both Windows and Linux VM documentation for username/password/SSH requirements.
Explicitly mention that the dashboard template and Azure CLI commands work for both Windows and Linux VMs.
Ensure that template customization instructions include Linux VM naming conventions and authentication options.
Review and update notes and references to avoid implying Windows is the default or only supported platform.

Create Pull Request

Quotas Increase Azure Storage account quotas ...main/articles/quotas/storage-account-quota-requests.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias by listing Azure PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) before Azure CLI and REST API when mentioning command-line options for viewing quota usage. No Linux-specific examples or tools are provided, and PowerShell is referenced first, which may suggest a preference for Windows environments.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux usage examples, such as Azure CLI commands run in Bash.
List Azure CLI before PowerShell when presenting cross-platform options, as CLI is natively supported on Linux and macOS.
Clarify that both Azure CLI and PowerShell are cross-platform, and provide installation or usage notes for Linux users.
Include screenshots or instructions demonstrating quota management from Linux or macOS terminals.
Avoid implying PowerShell is the default or preferred tool unless justified by functionality.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Perform ongoing maintenance and administration for Azure Arc-enabled System Center Virtual Machine Manager ...center-virtual-machine-manager/administer-arc-scvmm.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page focuses on Azure Arc-enabled System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM), a Windows-centric technology. All operational examples use Azure CLI, which is cross-platform, but the instructions and context are tailored to Windows environments (e.g., SCVMM, Azure portal screenshots, resource bridge VM management). There is no mention of Linux-specific tools, patterns, or alternative workflows, nor are there examples showing how to perform maintenance or troubleshooting from a Linux workstation. The documentation implicitly assumes a Windows administrative context and does not address Linux parity.

Recommendations

Explicitly state that Azure CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide example command lines for Linux environments (e.g., file paths, SSH usage).
Include instructions for securely storing and managing kubeconfig and YAML files on Linux systems, such as using chmod for permissions.
Add examples of connecting to the resource bridge VM via SSH from Linux, including typical SSH command syntax.
Mention Linux-native tools (e.g., curl, scp) for log collection and file transfer, and provide sample usage.
Clarify any prerequisites or limitations for Linux administrators, such as required CLI extensions or compatibility notes.
Provide screenshots or descriptions of Azure portal workflows that are OS-agnostic, or note that the portal is accessible from any OS.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Azure built-in roles for Azure Arc-enabled SCVMM ...ystem-center-virtual-machine-manager/built-in-roles.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation is focused exclusively on Azure Arc-enabled SCVMM, which is inherently a Windows-centric technology (System Center Virtual Machine Manager). All roles and actions described are specific to SCVMM and related Microsoft services, with no mention of Linux equivalents, cross-platform management, or examples for Linux environments. There are no references to Linux tools, commands, or patterns, nor any guidance for Linux administrators.

Recommendations

Clearly state at the beginning that SCVMM is a Windows-only technology and that the documentation is intended for Windows environments.
If Azure Arc supports Linux-based virtualization platforms (such as VMware, KVM, or others), provide parallel documentation and role definitions for those platforms.
Include guidance or references for Linux administrators on how to manage hybrid environments, if applicable.
Add cross-platform notes or links to Azure Arc documentation for Linux servers and workloads to help users understand the broader context.
Ensure that any future documentation for Azure Arc covers both Windows and Linux scenarios where possible, with examples and role definitions for each.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Create custom roles with Azure Arc-enabled SCVMM ...-center-virtual-machine-manager/create-custom-roles.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page focuses exclusively on Azure Arc-enabled SCVMM, a Windows-centric technology, and all examples and instructions are given using the Azure portal. While it mentions Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI as alternatives, the main walkthrough is portal-based and does not provide any Linux-specific examples or mention Linux-native tools or patterns. The documentation assumes familiarity with SCVMM, which is a Windows-only management tool, and does not discuss Linux VM management or cross-platform considerations.

Recommendations

Include explicit instructions or examples for managing custom roles using Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux.
Clarify whether the steps and role management apply only to SCVMM-managed Windows VMs or if there is parity for Linux VMs managed via Azure Arc.
Add notes or links for Linux administrators on how to perform similar RBAC operations for Linux resources in Azure Arc environments.
If possible, provide examples of JSON role definitions that include permissions relevant to Linux workloads or resource providers.
Ensure that references to PowerShell are balanced with CLI examples, and avoid assuming users are on Windows unless required by the technology.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Enable SCVMM inventory resources in Azure Arc center ...al-machine-manager/enable-scvmm-inventory-resources.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation is focused exclusively on SCVMM (System Center Virtual Machine Manager), a Windows-centric management tool, and provides instructions only for managing SCVMM resources via the Azure portal. There are no references to Linux-based virtualization platforms, nor are there examples or guidance for users managing Linux VMs or using Linux management tools.

Recommendations

Include guidance or references for managing Linux-based virtualization platforms (such as KVM, oVirt, or VMware on Linux) in Azure Arc, if supported.
Provide examples or links for enabling inventory resources for Linux VMs, or clarify if the feature is Windows/SCVMM-only.
Add a comparison table or section outlining differences and parity between Windows SCVMM and Linux virtualization management in Azure Arc.
Explicitly state platform limitations and suggest alternative workflows for Linux environments where applicable.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Perform ongoing maintenance and administration for Azure Arc-enabled VMware vSphere ...cles/azure-arc/vmware-vsphere/administer-arc-vmware.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation consistently provides Azure CLI examples and instructions without specifying or demonstrating platform-specific steps for Linux or macOS. All operational guidance assumes use of the Azure CLI, but does not clarify whether commands are cross-platform or highlight differences for Linux users. Additionally, GUI instructions (e.g., Azure portal navigation) are presented without mentioning platform parity or alternatives for Linux environments. There are no PowerShell-specific commands, but the absence of Linux-specific examples or notes creates a subtle Windows-first bias.

Recommendations

Explicitly state that Azure CLI commands are cross-platform and provide any necessary Linux/macOS prerequisites (e.g., installation steps, environment variables).
Include example commands or screenshots for Linux terminal environments where relevant, especially for SSH and file management operations.
Clarify any platform-specific differences in file paths, permissions, or CLI usage between Windows and Linux.
Add notes or links for Linux users regarding Azure CLI installation and usage.
Where GUI steps are described, mention that the Azure portal is accessible from any OS and provide alternatives (e.g., Azure CLI or REST API) for users who prefer command-line operations.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Create a virtual machine on VMware vSphere using Azure Arc ...les/azure-arc/vmware-vsphere/create-virtual-machine.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page primarily describes VM creation via the Azure portal, with administrator account setup focused on username/password authentication (typical for Windows). Linux-specific guidance is limited to a brief mention that SSH keys can be used for authentication, without further details or examples. No Linux-specific screenshots, step-by-step instructions, or parity in configuration options are provided. The reference to PowerShell in the 'Reference' section is generic, but no Linux CLI or shell examples are given.

Recommendations

Provide explicit Linux VM creation examples, including screenshots showing SSH key authentication and Linux-specific options.
Include step-by-step instructions for Linux VM setup, such as configuring SSH keys, setting hostnames, and post-deployment steps relevant to Linux.
Ensure parity in documentation for both Windows and Linux, such as describing differences in guest management, agent installation, and connectivity for Linux VMs.
Add references and examples for Linux command-line tools (e.g., Bash, Azure CLI on Linux) alongside PowerShell.
Clarify any differences in VM template usage or customization for Linux guests.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Create a virtual machine on VMware vCenter using Infrastructure as Code methods ...es/azure-arc/vmware-vsphere/quick-start-create-a-vm.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a subtle Windows bias. VM templates and sample values consistently use Windows-centric naming conventions (e.g., 'contoso-template-win22', 'Administrator' as the default username), and all examples assume a Windows guest OS. There are no Linux-specific examples, usernames, or template references, nor any mention of Linux guest customization or provisioning. This may unintentionally signal that Windows is the primary or only supported OS for these workflows.

Recommendations

Include Linux VM template examples alongside Windows ones (e.g., 'contoso-template-ubuntu22').
Provide sample variable values and code snippets using typical Linux usernames (e.g., 'ubuntu', 'root') and passwords.
Add notes or sections describing any Linux-specific configuration steps, such as SSH key injection, cloud-init usage, or differences in agent installation.
Clarify in the documentation that both Windows and Linux VMs are supported, and link to resources for Linux guest customization.
When listing templates or sample IDs, alternate between Windows and Linux examples to avoid implicit prioritization.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc External Validation for Workload Orchestration ...zure-arc/workload-orchestration/external-validation.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation consistently provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for all CLI operations, but PowerShell is always presented as the second tab after Bash. There are no examples or references to Windows-specific tools outside of PowerShell, and no exclusive use of Windows-only patterns. However, the presence of PowerShell examples throughout, and the explicit separation of Bash and PowerShell, may signal a slight Windows bias, especially for users who expect cross-platform parity beyond just CLI syntax. No Linux-specific tools or workflows are mentioned, and the focus is entirely on Azure CLI and PowerShell, which are available on both platforms but may be more familiar to Windows users.

Recommendations

Clarify that all CLI examples work identically on both Windows and Linux when using Azure CLI.
Consider including a note or section on using Azure CLI in native Linux environments, such as with package managers or shell integration.
If relevant, add troubleshooting tips for common Linux shell issues (e.g., quoting, environment variables) when running Azure CLI commands.
Ensure that PowerShell examples do not assume Windows-only features and clarify cross-platform compatibility.
If possible, add examples using other popular Linux shells (e.g., zsh, fish) or highlight any differences in command syntax or environment setup.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Set Up Workload Orchestration .../workload-orchestration/initial-setup-configuration.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for setting up workload orchestration, but the PowerShell tab is given equal prominence to Bash, which is not typical for cross-platform Azure CLI documentation. The PowerShell examples are extensive and use Windows-centric variable syntax, which may suggest a bias toward Windows users. There are no Linux-specific tools or patterns mentioned, and the Bash examples do not reference Linux-specific nuances or troubleshooting. The documentation does not mention Linux distributions, shell environments, or provide guidance for Linux-specific issues, which could leave Linux users underserved.

Recommendations

Prioritize Bash examples and ensure they are fully tested on common Linux distributions (Ubuntu, CentOS, etc.).
Add Linux-specific troubleshooting tips (e.g., file permissions, environment variables, shell differences).
Mention supported shell environments (e.g., Bash, Zsh) and clarify that Bash examples are intended for Linux/macOS.
If PowerShell is included, clarify its cross-platform nature and provide guidance for installing and using PowerShell on Linux.
Include notes on differences in file path formats, environment variable usage, and common errors on Linux.
Reference Linux-native tools or patterns where appropriate (e.g., using jq for JSON manipulation, curl/wget for downloads).

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Create a Solution with Multiple Dependencies with Workload Orchestration ...quickstart-solution-multiple-shared-adapter-dependency.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for every CLI command, but PowerShell examples are always presented immediately after Bash, with equal prominence and detail. There is no evidence of exclusive use of Windows tools or patterns, nor are Windows-specific tools mentioned before Linux equivalents. However, the presence of PowerShell examples throughout, and their parity with Bash, may signal a slight Windows bias, especially for users who expect Linux-first documentation in cloud and Kubernetes contexts.

Recommendations

Explicitly state that all commands work on both Linux and Windows, and clarify any platform-specific differences if present.
Consider listing Bash examples first, as Bash is the default shell on most Linux and macOS systems and is commonly used in cloud-native environments.
Add a note about how to run PowerShell on Linux and macOS, if relevant, to avoid implying PowerShell is Windows-only.
If possible, provide a single set of CLI examples (Bash syntax) and mention that PowerShell users can adapt variable syntax as needed, unless there are significant behavioral differences.
Review the documentation for any subtle assumptions about file paths, environment variables, or shell behavior that may differ between Windows and Linux.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Create a Basic Solution with Workload Orchestration ...on/quickstart-solution-without-common-configuration.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for all CLI commands, but PowerShell examples are always presented immediately after Bash, and variable naming conventions (e.g., $childName) are more Windows-centric. There is no explicit Linux bias, but the presence of PowerShell examples throughout and the use of Windows-style variable names and patterns may suggest a slight Windows bias. No Linux-specific tools, patterns, or troubleshooting are mentioned, and the documentation does not address Linux-specific nuances (such as shell differences or file permissions).

Recommendations

Add explicit notes about Linux compatibility, including any differences in CLI behavior, file permissions, or environment setup.
Include troubleshooting tips for common Linux issues (e.g., file permissions, path separators).
Ensure variable naming and examples are equally representative of Linux conventions (e.g., avoid camelCase for Bash variables, use lowercase with underscores).
Consider providing a generic 'CLI' tab for commands that are identical across platforms, reducing the perception of Windows/Powershell bias.
Mention any Linux-specific dependencies or prerequisites if applicable.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Create a Solution with Shared Adapter Dependency with Workload Orchestration ...ation/quickstart-solution-shared-adapter-dependency.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for every CLI operation, but PowerShell is always presented as a first-class citizen, with equal prominence and detail as Bash. There is a subtle Windows bias in the structure: PowerShell examples are always present, and sometimes appear before or with Bash, which is less common in cross-platform documentation. There are no Linux-specific tools, troubleshooting steps, or environment setup instructions; the only Linux parity is the Bash tab. No explicit Linux-only examples, nor are Linux-specific nuances discussed.

Recommendations

Ensure Bash examples are presented first, as Bash is the default shell on most Linux systems.
Add explicit notes about running commands in Linux environments, including common troubleshooting steps (e.g., file permissions, environment variables).
Include guidance for Linux package managers or dependencies if any are required.
Mention differences in file paths, environment variable syntax, or CLI behavior between Windows and Linux where relevant.
Consider adding a section on running the CLI in WSL or native Linux, if applicable.
Clarify that PowerShell examples are for Windows users, and Bash for Linux/macOS, to help users choose the right tab.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Upgrade a Shared Application with Workload Orchestration ...orchestration/quickstart-upgrade-shared-application.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for all CLI commands, but PowerShell is given equal prominence to Bash, which is uncommon in cross-platform documentation. The PowerShell tab appears immediately after Bash, and variable assignment and command syntax are tailored for Windows/PowerShell users. There is no mention of Linux-specific tools, patterns, or troubleshooting, and the overall structure assumes parity between Windows and Linux, but with a slight emphasis on PowerShell scripting.

Recommendations

Add explicit notes about platform compatibility for the Azure CLI commands, clarifying any differences in behavior or prerequisites between Windows and Linux.
Include troubleshooting steps or environment setup instructions specific to Linux (e.g., permissions, shell differences, package dependencies).
Consider listing Bash examples first, as Bash is the default shell on most Linux and macOS systems.
Add a section on running the commands in WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux) for Windows users who prefer Bash.
Ensure that any file path or environment variable usage is cross-platform (e.g., use $HOME instead of %USERPROFILE% in examples).

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Service Groups for Workload Orchestration ...cles/azure-arc/workload-orchestration/service-group.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for all command-line operations, but PowerShell examples are always listed after Bash, and in some cases, PowerShell code is more elaborate (e.g., using ConvertFrom-JSON, Select-Object, etc.). There is no evidence of exclusive use of Windows tools or missing Linux examples, as all commands use the cross-platform Azure CLI. However, the PowerShell examples are sometimes more detailed, and the documentation assumes familiarity with PowerShell-specific patterns (backticks, object manipulation), which may be less accessible to Linux users. There is a mild 'windows_first' bias in the sense that PowerShell is given parity but with more complexity, and some advanced steps are only shown in PowerShell.

Recommendations

Ensure that Bash and PowerShell examples are equally detailed and cover all advanced scenarios in both tabs.
Where PowerShell-specific object manipulation is shown (e.g., working with JSON, arrays), provide equivalent Bash/jq examples for Linux users.
Add a note clarifying that Azure CLI commands work cross-platform and that Bash examples are suitable for Linux/macOS users.
Avoid PowerShell-specific idioms (like backticks for line continuation) in shared explanations, or provide Bash equivalents.
Consider listing Bash examples first, or alternating the order, to avoid implicit prioritization of Windows/PowerShell.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Solution with a Leaf Target ...oad-orchestration/tutorial-service-group-scenario-1.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for all command-line steps, ensuring coverage for both Linux and Windows users. However, PowerShell examples are given equal prominence as Bash, and in some cases, PowerShell syntax is used for Azure CLI commands that are platform-agnostic. There is a slight Windows bias in the sense that PowerShell is featured as the primary alternative to Bash, rather than including other Linux-native shells or scripting environments. No explicit Windows-only tools or patterns are used, and Linux examples are not missing.

Recommendations

Clarify that Azure CLI commands work identically in Bash and PowerShell, and that PowerShell is not required on Windows if Bash is available.
Consider including a note that Bash examples can be run on Windows using WSL or Git Bash, to encourage Linux parity for Windows users.
If possible, add examples for other Linux shells (e.g., zsh) or scripting environments, or clarify that Bash syntax is representative of most Linux shells.
Avoid implying that PowerShell is the default or preferred scripting environment for Windows users unless there is a technical reason.
Ensure that any platform-specific nuances (e.g., file path separators, environment variable syntax) are highlighted where relevant.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Solution with Multiple Shared Dependencies at Different Hierarchy Levels ...oad-orchestration/tutorial-service-group-scenario-3.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for every step, but PowerShell is given equal prominence as Bash, despite PowerShell being primarily a Windows tool. In several places, PowerShell examples use Windows-style paths (e.g., .\file.yaml), and the PowerShell tab is always present even for tasks that are natively Linux-oriented (such as Helm usage). There is no explicit Linux-only example or guidance, and the documentation does not mention Linux-native shells or tools beyond Bash. The order of tabs is Bash first, but the overall parity is high, with no missing Linux examples.

Recommendations

Clarify that PowerShell examples are intended for Windows users, and Bash for Linux/macOS.
Add explicit notes on platform compatibility for each example (e.g., 'Use Bash on Linux/macOS, PowerShell on Windows').
Where possible, provide native Linux shell alternatives for PowerShell-specific constructs (e.g., ForEach-Object loops).
Ensure file path examples use POSIX style in Bash and Windows style in PowerShell, with explanations.
Consider adding troubleshooting notes for common cross-platform issues (e.g., file permissions, path separators).

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Solution with a Non-Leaf Target ...oad-orchestration/tutorial-service-group-scenario-2.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for all command-line steps, but PowerShell is given equal prominence and detail as Bash, and in some places, the PowerShell example is slightly more verbose or emphasized. There is no explicit mention of Linux-specific tools or workflows outside Bash, and Windows/PowerShell is always presented as a first-class option, sometimes with slightly more explanation. The Azure portal (a web UI) is mentioned for validation, but no Linux-native GUI alternatives are suggested. The documentation does not reference WSL, Linux desktop tools, or troubleshooting for Linux environments.

Recommendations

Ensure Bash examples are always presented first, as Bash is the default shell on most Linux systems.
Add explicit notes about Linux compatibility, such as confirming that all az CLI commands work identically on Linux and macOS.
Include troubleshooting tips for Linux users (e.g., file permissions, environment variables, path separators).
Mention Linux-native GUI alternatives for validation (e.g., Lens, K9s) alongside Azure portal.
Clarify that PowerShell examples are primarily for Windows users, and Bash is recommended for Linux/macOS.
If possible, provide a single Bash example and note that PowerShell is optional for Windows users, to avoid implying parity where it may not exist.

Create Pull Request

Azure Portal Get subscription and tenant IDs in the Azure portal ...in/articles/azure-portal/get-subscription-tenant-id.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation provides both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI options for programmatic access, but PowerShell is consistently mentioned first and with more detail. This ordering and emphasis may suggest a Windows-centric bias, as PowerShell is traditionally a Windows tool, even though it is now cross-platform. There are no explicit Linux-only examples or mentions of Linux-specific tools or workflows, and the copy/paste instructions reference generic text documents rather than platform-specific editors.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of PowerShell and CLI examples, or list CLI first to avoid implicit Windows-first bias.
Explicitly mention that both Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI are cross-platform and available on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
Provide example commands for both PowerShell and CLI side-by-side, with notes on platform compatibility.
Include a brief note or link about installing and using Azure CLI and PowerShell on Linux.
Reference Linux-specific workflows or tools where appropriate, such as using the terminal or text editors like nano/vim for copying IDs.

Create Pull Request

Azure Portal Programmatically create Azure Dashboards ...tal/azure-portal-dashboards-create-programmatically.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias. In several places, Azure PowerShell is mentioned before Azure CLI, and PowerShell is listed as a primary deployment method alongside REST API and CLI. There are no explicit Linux shell examples, and the ordering of links and instructions tends to favor Windows/PowerShell tools. However, Azure CLI is also referenced, and links to both Linux and Windows VM creation guides are provided in dashboard content.

Recommendations

Ensure Azure CLI is listed before or alongside PowerShell in tool recommendations, as CLI is cross-platform and preferred by many Linux users.
Add explicit Linux shell (bash) examples for deploying dashboards using Azure CLI, demonstrating parity with PowerShell examples.
When listing deployment options, alternate the order or clarify that both CLI and PowerShell are fully supported and cross-platform.
Include links to Linux-specific documentation (e.g., Azure CLI installation on Linux) in the 'Next steps' or relevant sections.
Review dashboard JSON examples to ensure resource group and VM names do not imply Windows-only usage (e.g., avoid 'SimpleWinVMResourceGroup').

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Kubernetes Pull Secret for ACR Authentication ...ntainer-registry/container-registry-auth-kubernetes.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides an example for resetting a service principal password using the Azure CLI, which is cross-platform, but does not mention or provide examples for Linux-specific tools or workflows. There are no PowerShell-specific commands, but the lack of Linux-specific context (such as shell differences, credential storage, or alternative authentication patterns) and exclusive mention of Azure CLI (often associated with Windows usage) may suggest a subtle Windows bias. No Linux-first or Linux-only examples are present.

Recommendations

Explicitly mention that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide installation instructions for Linux users.
Include Linux-specific notes, such as using bash environment variables for secrets, or referencing Linux credential managers.
Add examples or links for using kubectl and Azure CLI on Linux, including any differences in authentication or environment setup.
Clarify that all commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and highlight any OS-specific considerations.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Store Helm Charts in Azure Container Registry ...es/container-registry/container-registry-helm-repos.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page demonstrates a subtle Windows bias by using Windows-style commands (e.g., 'set' for environment variables) and omitting Linux/macOS equivalents. The environment variable setup uses 'set', which is specific to Windows CMD, without providing the more common 'export' command for Bash on Linux/macOS. No PowerShell-specific commands are present, but the lack of Linux/Bash parity in examples may hinder non-Windows users. The rest of the CLI commands are cross-platform, but the initial environment variable setup is Windows-centric.

Recommendations

Provide both Windows (CMD/PowerShell) and Linux/macOS (Bash) command examples for environment variable setup, e.g., 'set' and 'export'.
Add a note clarifying which commands are platform-specific and which are cross-platform.
Ensure all code snippets are tested and presented for both major platforms, especially for setup steps.
Consider using platform-agnostic variable assignment in documentation, or provide tabs/switchers for Windows and Linux/macOS users.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Azure Container Registry Entra permissions and role assignments overview ...try/container-registry-rbac-built-in-roles-overview.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation page lists Azure CLI, Azure PowerShell, and Azure Portal as the primary tools for performing role assignments, with PowerShell mentioned explicitly and equally alongside CLI and Portal. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples, nor is Bash or Linux terminal usage referenced. The documentation does not provide parity for Linux users in terms of command-line examples or tool recommendations, and PowerShell (primarily a Windows tool, though available on Linux) is given prominence. No Linux-first or Linux-native patterns are discussed.

Recommendations

Add explicit Bash/Linux shell examples for role assignment operations using Azure CLI.
Clarify that Azure CLI is cross-platform and provide usage examples for Linux/macOS terminals.
If PowerShell is mentioned, note its availability on Linux, but avoid implying it is the default or preferred method.
Consider including links or references to Linux-specific documentation or troubleshooting guides.
Ensure that all example commands are shown in both PowerShell and Bash syntax where relevant.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Azure Container Registry custom roles ...ainer-registry/container-registry-rbac-custom-roles.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation page presents both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples for listing permissions, but PowerShell (a Windows-centric tool) is mentioned alongside CLI without clarifying cross-platform compatibility. In several places, Azure PowerShell is listed before or equally with Azure CLI, which may subtly prioritize Windows workflows. There are no explicit Linux-specific examples or notes about platform differences, and PowerShell is not clearly marked as Windows-only, potentially leading Linux users to confusion.

Recommendations

Clearly indicate which tools are cross-platform (e.g., Azure CLI) and which are Windows-specific (e.g., Azure PowerShell).
List Azure CLI examples before PowerShell, as CLI is cross-platform and more widely used on Linux.
Add explicit Linux shell examples where relevant, or clarify that Azure CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
Include notes or links for installing and using Azure CLI on Linux.
Avoid presenting PowerShell as an equal alternative without noting its platform specificity.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Quickstart- Manage Container Registry Content with Azure Client Libraries ...cles/container-registry/quickstart-client-libraries.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page shows mild Windows bias in the 'Prerequisites' section, where Windows-specific tools (Azure PowerShell) and the Azure portal are mentioned before the Azure CLI, and a PowerShell example is given for .NET package installation. However, the main client library usage examples are cross-platform and do not show further Windows bias.

Recommendations

List cross-platform tools (Azure CLI) before Windows-specific tools (Azure PowerShell, Azure portal) in the prerequisites section.
Provide explicit instructions or examples for Linux/macOS environments where relevant (e.g., package installation commands for .NET using bash).
Clarify that Azure CLI is available on all platforms and is recommended for cross-platform usage.
Where PowerShell is used for .NET, offer a bash alternative for Linux/macOS users.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Customer intent: "As a security analyst, I want to view vulnerability assessment results for container images, so that I can ensure all security issues are identified and resolved in our container registry." ...ontainer-registry/includes/azure-container-registry.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation provides both Azure CLI and Azure PowerShell examples, but the PowerShell example is given equal prominence as the CLI example, and is presented before any mention of Linux-specific tools or shell environments. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) examples, nor is there any mention of Linux-specific considerations. The presence of a PowerShell tab (which is Windows-centric, though PowerShell Core is cross-platform) without a corresponding bash or Linux shell tab may suggest a subtle Windows bias.

Recommendations

Add a dedicated Bash/Linux shell example tab, showing the Azure CLI command in a bash context (e.g., with environment variables, piping, jq usage, etc.).
Explicitly mention that the Azure CLI example works on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and provide any Linux-specific notes if needed.
If PowerShell is included, clarify whether the example is for Windows PowerShell or cross-platform PowerShell Core.
Consider presenting the Azure CLI (which is cross-platform) example first, and PowerShell second, to avoid the impression of Windows-first bias.
Where relevant, add troubleshooting or environment setup notes for Linux users.

Create Pull Request

Container Registry Quickstart: Deploying the Connected Registry Arc Extension ...iner-registry/quickstart-connected-registry-arc-cli.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both Bash and PowerShell examples for generating the protected settings JSON file, but the PowerShell example is given immediately after Bash and is not clearly marked as Windows-specific. There is no explicit prioritization of Windows tools or exclusive use of Windows patterns, but the presence of a PowerShell example may suggest a slight Windows bias, especially since PowerShell is primarily a Windows shell (though available on Linux). All other CLI examples use Azure CLI and kubectl, which are cross-platform, and there are no exclusively Windows tools or instructions. No Linux-specific issues or missing Linux examples are apparent, but the Bash/PowerShell split could be improved for parity and clarity.

Recommendations

Clearly label the Bash example as suitable for Linux/macOS and the PowerShell example as suitable for Windows.
Consider listing the Bash example first, as Bash is the default shell on most Linux systems.
Add a note explaining that PowerShell Core is available on Linux, but most Linux users will prefer Bash.
Ensure all steps and commands are tested and work on Linux, and explicitly mention any OS-specific caveats.
If possible, provide a single cross-platform example (e.g., using Azure CLI and jq) to reduce confusion.

Create Pull Request

Lighthouse Remove access to a delegation ...b/main/articles/lighthouse/how-to/remove-delegation.md

Medium Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 2 bias types

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy

Summary

The documentation provides both PowerShell and Azure CLI examples for removing delegations, but PowerShell (commonly associated with Windows) is presented before Azure CLI. There are no explicit Linux-specific instructions or examples, and the use of PowerShell may implicitly favor Windows users. The Azure portal instructions are platform-neutral, but command-line guidance leans toward Windows-first patterns.

Recommendations

Present Azure CLI examples before PowerShell, as Azure CLI is cross-platform and widely used on Linux.
Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work on Linux, macOS, and Windows, while PowerShell is primarily used on Windows.
Include notes or examples for Linux users, such as using Bash or referencing shell environments.
Clarify that Cloud Shell supports both PowerShell and Bash, and provide guidance for selecting the preferred shell.
Avoid implying PowerShell is the default or preferred method unless there is a technical reason.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc CLI reference for `azcmagent config` ...ob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/azcmagent-config.md

Low Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 1 bias type

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides command-line usage and examples for the azcmagent config tool, but all examples are generic and do not reference platform-specific shells, tools, or patterns. However, there is a subtle bias: the extension allowlist example uses 'AzureMonitorWindowsAgent', which is a Windows-specific extension, and there are no Linux-specific extension examples or mentions. There are no PowerShell-specific commands or Windows tool references, but the lack of Linux parity in extension examples suggests a mild Windows bias.

Recommendations

Include examples that reference Linux-specific extensions, such as 'Microsoft.Azure.Monitor/AzureMonitorLinuxAgent', alongside Windows examples.
Add notes or examples showing usage in common Linux shells (e.g., bash), especially if there are platform-specific considerations.
Ensure that documentation mentions both Windows and Linux agent capabilities and configuration differences where relevant.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Monitoring, log analytics, Azure portal (SQL Managed Instance) ...monitoring-log-analytics-azure-portal-managed-instance.md

Low Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 1 bias type

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation page does not provide any platform-specific examples, but it also lacks explicit Linux or cross-platform guidance. There are no Windows-specific tools or examples, but the absence of Linux-specific instructions or parity checks may leave Linux users underserved.

Recommendations

Add explicit examples or instructions for monitoring and log analytics on Linux systems, such as using Bash, Linux-native monitoring tools, or CLI commands.
Ensure referenced includes (e.g., azure-arc-common-monitoring.md) contain cross-platform guidance and examples.
Clarify that the guidance applies equally to both Windows and Linux environments, or specify any platform-specific differences.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc CLI reference for `azcmagent genkey` ...ob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/azcmagent-genkey.md

Low Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 1 bias type

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation provides a generic command-line example without specifying platform-specific instructions. However, it lacks explicit Linux or cross-platform examples, such as shell usage, file permissions, or environment-specific notes. There is no evidence of Windows-specific tools or PowerShell usage, but the absence of Linux-specific guidance may hinder Linux users.

Recommendations

Add explicit Linux shell examples (e.g., bash usage, redirecting output, file permission management).
Clarify platform compatibility and note any OS-specific behaviors or requirements.
Include troubleshooting or verification steps for both Windows and Linux environments.
Mention prerequisites or dependencies that may differ between Windows and Linux.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc azcmagent CLI reference ...docs/blob/main/articles/azure-arc/servers/azcmagent.md

Low Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 1 bias type

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation page presents installation path information for Windows before Linux, and provides additional details about Windows PATH variable handling, while the Linux section is more concise. No command examples are given for either platform, and no PowerShell-specific instructions or Windows-only tools are referenced. The overall structure and content slightly favor Windows by mentioning it first and providing more operational detail.

Recommendations

Present installation paths for Windows and Linux in parallel, or alternate which platform is mentioned first.
Provide equivalent operational details for Linux, such as instructions for adding the CLI to the PATH if needed.
Include explicit CLI usage examples for both Windows (cmd/PowerShell) and Linux (bash) to ensure parity.
Reference Linux-specific troubleshooting or management tools where relevant, not just Windows concepts.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Limit access to Run command ...ain/articles/azure-arc/servers/run-command-security.md

Low Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 1 bias type

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ windows_first

Summary

The documentation presents the Windows example before the Linux example when demonstrating how to configure allowlists and blocklists for the Run command extension. This ordering may subtly prioritize Windows users and workflows, even though both platforms are covered with equivalent examples.

Recommendations

Alternate the order of examples, or present both Windows and Linux examples side-by-side to avoid implicit prioritization.
Explicitly state that the instructions apply equally to both Windows and Linux, and ensure parity in detail and clarity for both platforms.
Review other sections for similar ordering or emphasis and adjust to maintain platform neutrality.

Create Pull Request

Azure Arc Onboard Azure Arc-enabled server to Microsoft Sentinel ...s/azure-arc/servers/scenario-onboard-azure-sentinel.md

Low Priority View Details →

Reviewed by: LLM Analysis

Issues: 1 bias type

Detected Bias Types

⚠️ missing_linux_example

Summary

The documentation does not provide any platform-specific examples or instructions, but it also lacks explicit guidance or examples for Linux systems. There is no mention of Linux-specific commands, tools, or deployment patterns, nor is there any indication that the onboarding process may differ for Linux versus Windows Arc-enabled servers. This omission can be considered a subtle bias, as it may leave Linux users uncertain about platform compatibility or required steps.

Recommendations

Add explicit instructions or examples for onboarding Linux Arc-enabled servers, including any differences in agent installation or configuration.
Mention whether the Azure Monitor Agent and Sentinel onboarding process is identical for both Windows and Linux, or highlight any platform-specific considerations.
Provide sample commands for both Windows (e.g., PowerShell) and Linux (e.g., Bash/CLI) where relevant.
Clarify compatibility and support for Linux distributions in the prerequisites section.

Create Pull Request