← Back to Dashboard
50
Pages Scanned
3
Pages Flagged
50
Changed Pages
6.0%
% Pages Flagged

Scan Information

Started At: 2026-01-11 00:00:06

Finished At: 2026-01-11 18:19:24

Status: completed

Target Repo: Azure Compute

Current Phase: discovery

Files Queued: 50

Files Completed: 50

Problematic Pages

3 issues found
Virtual Machines Automatic Guest Patching for Azure Virtual Machines and Scale Sets ...ticles/virtual-machines/automatic-vm-guest-patching.md
High Priority View Details →
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ missing_linux_example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits several signs of Windows bias. Windows-specific information, examples, and tooling (PowerShell, registry keys, Windows Update service) are presented more frequently and in greater detail than Linux equivalents. Windows patch orchestration modes are described first and in more depth, with Linux modes covered later and more briefly. PowerShell and CLI examples for Windows VMs are more numerous and detailed, while Linux examples are limited or missing in some sections (e.g., PowerShell usage for Linux VMs). Windows tools and concepts (registry keys, WSUS, KB IDs) are referenced without Linux analogs. The 'Next steps' section links only to Windows VM management, omitting Linux VM guidance.
Recommendations
  • Ensure Linux examples are provided for every API, CLI, and PowerShell scenario, including VM creation, update, patch assessment, and patch installation.
  • Present Linux and Windows instructions in parallel, or alternate their order to avoid Windows-first presentation.
  • Include Linux-specific tooling and concepts (e.g., package managers, configuration files) where Windows-specific tools (registry, WSUS, KB IDs) are mentioned.
  • Expand explanations of Linux patch orchestration modes to match the detail given for Windows.
  • Add 'Next steps' links for Linux VM management alongside Windows VM links.
  • Where PowerShell is used for Windows, clarify if and how PowerShell or other automation tools can be used for Linux VMs, or provide equivalent Bash/Ansible examples.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Virtual Machine Scale Sets Create a Virtual Machine Scale Set with instance mix ...cles/virtual-machine-scale-sets/instance-mix-create.md
High Priority View Details →
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ powershell_heavy ⚠️ windows_tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by listing Azure PowerShell examples after Azure CLI, providing detailed PowerShell commands, and referencing Windows-centric tools and patterns (such as PowerShell and credential objects). While the Azure CLI examples use Ubuntu images and SSH authentication, the PowerShell section is more extensive and uses Windows-style parameters and patterns. There is no explicit Linux shell scripting example (e.g., Bash), and PowerShell is presented as a primary automation method, which may disadvantage Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Add Bash shell script examples for Linux users, especially for automation scenarios.
  • Clarify that PowerShell is cross-platform, but provide examples using native Linux tools where appropriate.
  • Ensure parity in example depth and detail between CLI and PowerShell sections.
  • Avoid Windows-centric terminology (e.g., 'Credential objects') unless also explaining Linux equivalents.
  • Explicitly mention Linux prerequisites and patterns (e.g., SSH key management, environment variables) alongside Windows ones.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Virtual Machines Ddsv6 size series ...virtual-machines/sizes/general-purpose/ddsv6-series.md
High Priority View Details →
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
⚠️ windows_tools ⚠️ windows_first ⚠️ missing_linux_example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits mild Windows bias. Windows-specific tools and patterns are referenced before or exclusively (e.g., nested virtualization links to Hyper-V on Windows), and bandwidth testing references NTTTCP, a Windows-centric tool, without mentioning Linux equivalents. There are no command-line examples, but where platform-specific features are discussed, Windows is mentioned first or exclusively. Linux parity is not fully addressed in feature support or tooling guidance.
Recommendations
  • When referencing nested virtualization, include links to Linux/KVM documentation or clarify Linux support status.
  • For bandwidth/throughput testing, mention Linux tools such as iperf or provide guidance for both Windows and Linux users.
  • Where features are not supported for either platform (e.g., disk encryption), clarify the parity and provide links to both Windows and Linux documentation.
  • Review all external links and ensure Linux equivalents are present and referenced with equal prominence.
  • Consider adding example usage or optimization guidance for both Windows and Linux where relevant.
GitHub Create Pull Request