Azure Netapp Files

252
Total Pages
149
Linux-Friendly Pages
103
Pages with Bias
40.9%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues

896 issues found
Showing 301-325 of 896 flagged pages
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/performance-azure-vmware-solution-datastore.md ...p-files/performance-azure-vmware-solution-datastore.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows tools and concepts (such as NTFS, volume shadow copies, and Windows Server disk striping) are mentioned alongside Linux equivalents, but Windows examples and references often appear first or are more detailed. There is a lack of explicit Linux command-line examples for key operations (e.g., disk striping), and Windows-specific tooling is referenced in the 'Next steps' before Linux equivalents. Linux is referenced (e.g., Ubuntu, XFS, LVM, xfs_freeze), but actionable guidance for Linux users is less prominent and less detailed than for Windows.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Linux command-line examples for disk striping and volume management (e.g., using LVM, mdadm, or XFS).
  • Ensure Linux tools and procedures are mentioned before or alongside Windows equivalents in all relevant sections.
  • Add step-by-step Linux examples for monitoring and backup operations, similar to those provided for Windows (e.g., how to use xfs_freeze, how to monitor with native Linux tools).
  • In the 'Next steps' section, include Linux-focused links and resources before or alongside Windows links.
  • Clarify parity between Windows and Linux features (e.g., snapshot/freeze operations, monitoring) and note any differences or limitations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol-schemas.md ...files/lightweight-directory-access-protocol-schemas.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page exhibits a strong Windows bias by focusing almost exclusively on Microsoft Active Directory as the LDAP server, referencing Windows-specific management tools (ADSI Edit), and providing examples and attribute details only in the context of Active Directory. There are no examples or instructions for configuring equivalent LDAP schema or attribute indexing in common Linux-based LDAP servers (such as OpenLDAP). The documentation assumes the reader is using Windows tools and environments, with no mention of Linux alternatives or parity.
Recommendations
  • Include equivalent instructions and examples for configuring LDAP schemas and attribute indexing in Linux-based LDAP servers (e.g., OpenLDAP).
  • Provide guidance on how to manage RFC 2307bis attributes and indexing using Linux tools (such as ldapmodify, slapd.conf, or olcAttributeTypes).
  • Add screenshots or command-line examples for Linux environments alongside Windows/ADSI Edit steps.
  • Clarify that Azure NetApp Files supports both Active Directory and other LDAP implementations, and highlight any differences or requirements for Linux-based LDAP servers.
  • Present examples and attribute tables in a platform-neutral way, or explicitly include both Windows and Linux contexts.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/modify-active-directory-connections.md ...re-netapp-files/modify-active-directory-connections.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing exclusively on Active Directory (a Windows-centric technology), referencing Windows tools and patterns (such as 'Active Directory Sites and Services', 'group policy', 'NTFS permissions', and 'SQL Server'), and omitting Linux-specific examples or guidance. There are no instructions or examples for managing AD connections from Linux environments, nor are Linux tools or patterns (like Samba, sssd, or Linux Kerberos configuration) mentioned.
Recommendations
  • Include Linux-specific examples for modifying Active Directory connections, such as using Samba or sssd for integration.
  • Reference Linux tools and configuration patterns (e.g., Kerberos configuration files, LDAP client settings) alongside Windows equivalents.
  • Provide guidance for administrators managing Azure NetApp Files from Linux systems, including CLI commands and troubleshooting steps.
  • Mention cross-platform considerations, such as differences in mounting SMB/NFS shares on Linux versus Windows.
  • Clarify which features or settings are relevant for Linux-based clients and environments.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/large-volumes-requirements-considerations.md ...app-files/large-volumes-requirements-considerations.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas. Feature registration and status checking are shown primarily with Azure PowerShell commands, with Azure CLI (cross-platform) only mentioned as an alternative in a parenthetical note. No Linux-specific shell examples (e.g., Bash) are provided, and PowerShell commands are always listed first. There is no mention of Linux tools or patterns for volume management or feature registration, despite the product's strong Linux use case (e.g., NFS, Linux benchmarks).
Recommendations
  • Provide Bash/Azure CLI examples for all feature registration and status checking steps, and list them before or alongside PowerShell examples.
  • Explicitly mention that Azure CLI commands work on Linux/macOS and Windows, and provide usage context for Linux users.
  • Add Linux-specific guidance or troubleshooting tips where relevant, especially in sections about volume creation and management.
  • Ensure that documentation does not assume Windows as the default environment, and use neutral language when referring to command-line tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-permissions.md ...e-netapp-files/network-attached-storage-permissions.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias in several ways. SMB share management is described exclusively via Windows tools (MMC console, Windows Explorer, 'net view'), with no mention of Linux or cross-platform alternatives for managing SMB shares or ACLs. All screenshots and examples for SMB features (access-based enumeration, nonbrowsable shares, encryption) use Windows interfaces. There are no Linux or Samba examples for SMB share access, enumeration, or ACL management, and the documentation does not mention how Linux clients interact with these features or how administrators can manage SMB permissions from Linux systems.
Recommendations
  • Include examples and screenshots of managing SMB shares and ACLs from Linux clients, such as using smbclient, mount.cifs, or setfacl.
  • Describe how Linux/Samba clients interact with SMB features like access-based enumeration and nonbrowsable shares.
  • Provide parity in instructions for managing SMB share permissions, including Linux command-line tools and Samba configuration.
  • Mention cross-platform tools or APIs for managing share-level permissions, not just Windows MMC.
  • Clarify any limitations or differences in SMB feature support between Windows and Linux clients.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/network-file-system-group-memberships.md ...-netapp-files/network-file-system-group-memberships.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by focusing on Microsoft Active Directory LDAP implementation, referencing Windows-specific tools (e.g., ldp.exe), and providing examples and screenshots exclusively from Windows environments. There are no examples or instructions for Linux LDAP servers (such as OpenLDAP), nor are Linux tools or patterns mentioned. The documentation assumes Windows-centric group membership logic and omits parallel Linux approaches.
Recommendations
  • Add equivalent examples for Linux LDAP servers (e.g., OpenLDAP), including schema attributes and group membership logic.
  • Include screenshots and command-line examples using Linux tools such as ldapsearch, getent, or nslcd.
  • Mention Linux-specific considerations for NFS group memberships and supplemental groups, such as differences in schema or configuration.
  • Provide guidance for configuring group limits and extended groups in Linux environments.
  • Clarify which instructions are Windows-specific and offer Linux alternatives where applicable.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-file-access-logs.md ...articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-file-access-logs.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates Windows bias in several ways. Instructions for setting SACLs for SMB shares are exclusively provided for Windows, including GUI steps using Windows tools, with no PowerShell or CLI alternatives, nor any mention of cross-platform tools. The Linux/NFS section refers readers to a separate page for steps, rather than providing them inline, and lacks parity in detail and guidance compared to the Windows section. Windows instructions are presented first and in greater detail, while Linux instructions are brief and indirect.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent step-by-step instructions for setting Audit ACEs on NFSv4.1 volumes directly in this page, not just as a link.
  • Include Linux command-line examples (e.g., using setfacl or nfs4_setfacl) for configuring audit ACEs.
  • Add PowerShell or CLI alternatives for Windows SACL configuration, not just GUI steps.
  • Present Windows and Linux instructions in parallel, with equal detail and prominence.
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform tools or approaches where possible.
  • Review and balance the order of presentation so that Linux/NFS instructions are not secondary to Windows/SMB.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-smb-share-access-control-lists.md ...-netapp-files/manage-smb-share-access-control-lists.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation exclusively describes Windows-based methods for viewing and modifying SMB share ACLs, relying on Windows Explorer and the Microsoft Management Console (MMC). There are no Linux or cross-platform examples, and all instructions and screenshots are Windows-centric. Windows tools are mentioned and used exclusively, with no mention of Linux alternatives or CLI-based approaches.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions for managing SMB share ACLs from Linux clients, such as using smbclient, smbcacls, or other Samba tools.
  • Include CLI-based examples (e.g., PowerShell, but also Linux shell commands) for viewing and modifying ACLs.
  • Mention any limitations or requirements for Linux users, and provide guidance for cross-platform management.
  • Reorganize sections to present platform-neutral information first, or provide parallel instructions for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Clarify whether management is possible via REST API, Azure CLI, or other non-Windows-specific tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions.md ...zure-netapp-files/network-attached-file-permissions.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page exhibits Windows bias by describing Windows SMB inheritance controls first and in more detail, including a screenshot of the Windows interface, while Linux/NFS equivalents are described only briefly and without visual aids or command examples. There are no Linux shell or NFS ACL command examples, and Windows tools/patterns (such as the advanced permission view) are mentioned exclusively.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux/NFS command-line examples for managing file permissions and inheritance (e.g., setfacl, getfacl, chmod, chown, umask, setgid).
  • Include screenshots or visual aids for Linux/NFS permission management, such as examples from a Linux file manager or terminal.
  • Present NFS/Linux information before or alongside Windows/SMB details to avoid ordering bias.
  • Expand explanations of NFSv3 and NFSv4.1 inheritance mechanisms with practical usage scenarios and commands.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/sever-message-block-support.md ...cles/azure-netapp-files/sever-message-block-support.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by predominantly referencing Windows tools, protocols, and patterns (such as NTFS, Hyper-V, MS SQL Server, VSS, and Windows-specific features). Windows terminology and features are explained in detail, while Linux or UNIX equivalents are rarely mentioned, and Linux client configuration or usage examples are absent. Features relevant to Linux/UNIX clients (such as UNIX extensions) are noted as disabled or unsupported, and there is little guidance for Linux administrators. References and links are almost exclusively to Microsoft/Windows documentation, further reinforcing the Windows-centric perspective.
Recommendations
  • Include explicit examples and guidance for configuring and accessing Azure NetApp Files SMB shares from Linux clients (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or relevant Linux tools).
  • Provide parity in documentation for Linux/UNIX features, such as POSIX permissions, and clarify how dual-protocol volumes behave for Linux clients.
  • Add references and links to Linux/UNIX documentation and tools where appropriate (e.g., Samba, Kerberos configuration on Linux, NFS export policies).
  • Discuss limitations and workarounds for Linux clients, especially where Windows features are not supported or behave differently.
  • Balance explanations of Windows-specific features (like NTFS semantics, VSS, Hyper-V) with Linux/UNIX equivalents or alternatives, or clearly state when features are Windows-only.
  • Add troubleshooting and best practices sections for Linux/UNIX environments using SMB with Azure NetApp Files.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-path-lengths.md ...articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-path-lengths.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows/SMB scenarios, registry edits, and Group Policy for path length extension, with screenshots and detailed instructions for Windows clients. Windows tools and terminology (CMD, UNC paths, drive letter mapping) are mentioned extensively, while Linux/NFS examples are limited to basic command-line usage and a single utility (uniutils). Linux methods for extending or querying path limits are not covered in detail, and parity in troubleshooting or error handling is lacking.
Recommendations
  • Provide equivalent Linux/NFS troubleshooting steps and error screenshots for path length issues.
  • Include instructions for querying and adjusting NFS path limits using Linux tools and configuration files (e.g., limits.h, getconf).
  • Offer examples for mounting NFS shares with long paths and discuss relevant Linux client behaviors.
  • Balance the order of presentation so that Linux/NFS and Windows/SMB are treated equally, rather than Windows-first.
  • Mention Linux-specific limitations, workarounds, and configuration options where Windows registry/group policy edits are discussed.
  • Add parity in examples for extending path limits, such as kernel or mount options for NFS, and clarify cross-platform compatibility concerns.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/volume-hard-quota-guidelines.md ...les/azure-netapp-files/volume-hard-quota-guidelines.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias in several areas: Windows examples and tools (Explorer, dir command) are presented before Linux equivalents, and screenshots for CLI operations use PowerShell rather than Bash or native Linux shells. The CLI section references Azure CLI and PowerShell, but all screenshots and walkthroughs use PowerShell, with no explicit Bash or Linux shell examples. There is also a tendency to mention Windows tools and patterns first in monitoring and management sections.
Recommendations
  • Alternate the order of Windows and Linux examples, or present them side-by-side to ensure parity.
  • Include explicit Bash/Linux shell examples and screenshots for CLI operations, not just PowerShell.
  • Reference Linux-native tools (e.g., Bash, shell scripting) in CLI and automation sections, and provide sample commands.
  • Ensure that monitoring and management instructions are equally detailed for both Windows and Linux environments.
  • Avoid using only Windows screenshots for generic Azure CLI operations; include Linux terminal screenshots as well.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-volume-languages.md ...cles/azure-netapp-files/understand-volume-languages.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Windows tools (Explorer, PowerShell, Notepad, Notepad++, CMD, Windows Terminal) are frequently mentioned and illustrated, often before or instead of Linux equivalents. PowerShell examples and screenshots are prevalent, while Linux commands and tools (aside from 'file' and 'iconv') are less emphasized and sometimes only referenced after Windows workflows. Some sections (e.g., file encoding conversion, font/locale troubleshooting) focus on Windows-specific utilities and settings, with Linux alternatives mentioned briefly or not at all.
Recommendations
  • Ensure Linux examples (e.g., using 'iconv', 'file', 'locale', 'cat', 'ls', etc.) are provided alongside or before Windows examples in each relevant section.
  • Include screenshots and step-by-step instructions for common Linux desktop environments (e.g., GNOME Files, KDE Dolphin) when discussing file/folder name display and encoding issues.
  • Expand troubleshooting guidance for Linux terminals (e.g., font selection in GNOME Terminal, locale configuration in bash/zsh, handling Unicode in xterm/konsole).
  • When discussing file encoding conversion, provide parity between PowerShell and Linux shell commands (e.g., show how to convert encodings with 'iconv' and 'recode' in Linux, not just PowerShell).
  • Reference Linux text editors (e.g., gedit, vim, nano) for viewing and changing file encodings, not just Notepad/Notepad++.
  • Clarify that remote access and encoding issues apply equally to Linux SSH clients (OpenSSH, MobaXterm, etc.), not just PuTTY and Bastion.
  • Balance the use of Windows and Linux terminology and tools throughout the documentation, ensuring Linux users are equally supported.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-introduction.md .../articles/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-introduction.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates mild Windows bias. In sections describing ways to create and manage snapshots, Windows-centric tools (PowerShell) are listed explicitly and often before Linux equivalents. There are no explicit Linux shell (bash) or scripting examples, and references to scripting link to SQL Server/Windows-centric blog posts. The documentation does not provide parity in Linux/Unix command-line examples or mention Linux-native tools for managing Azure NetApp Files snapshots.
Recommendations
  • Include explicit Linux/Unix command-line examples (e.g., bash scripts using Azure CLI) alongside PowerShell examples.
  • List Azure CLI before or alongside PowerShell when enumerating management options, to avoid Windows-first ordering.
  • Provide links to Linux-focused guides or blog posts for scripting and automation.
  • Clarify that all features are accessible from Linux environments and provide sample commands for common Linux distributions.
  • Mention cross-platform compatibility of tools (Azure CLI, REST API) and provide usage examples for both Windows and Linux.
  • Where scripts are referenced, ensure examples are available in both PowerShell and bash/shell formats.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/understand-data-encryption.md ...icles/azure-netapp-files/understand-data-encryption.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by prioritizing Windows-centric technologies and examples, such as SMB and Active Directory, and referencing Windows tools and security advisories. SMB encryption is discussed in detail before NFS/Kerberos, and UNC hardening is covered exclusively with Microsoft terminology. LDAP signing and channel binding are described primarily in the context of Windows Active Directory, with links to Windows documentation and Group Policy configuration. There is a lack of Linux-specific examples, tools, or configuration guidance, especially for NFS and LDAP scenarios, and no parity in showing how Linux clients or servers interact with Azure NetApp Files encryption features.
Recommendations
  • Add Linux-specific examples for NFS encryption, such as configuration steps for Kerberos authentication on popular Linux distributions.
  • Include guidance for configuring LDAP signing and StartTLS from Linux clients and servers, referencing common open-source LDAP implementations (e.g., OpenLDAP).
  • Provide parity in example order: present NFS/Kerberos and SMB encryption side-by-side, or alternate which protocol is discussed first.
  • Reference Linux tools (e.g., smbclient, mount.cifs, ldapsearch) and show how to verify encryption or configure secure connections from Linux environments.
  • Include troubleshooting steps and performance considerations for both Windows and Linux clients.
  • Where Windows-specific features (e.g., UNC hardening, Group Policy) are discussed, offer Linux equivalents or note their applicability.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/whats-new.md ...ocs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/whats-new.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
🔧 Windows Tools Windows First Powershell Heavy Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation for Azure NetApp Files demonstrates a moderate Windows bias. Features and enhancements related to Windows environments (such as SMB, Active Directory, Windows Server, and Windows-specific tools like File Explorer) are frequently highlighted, often with more detail or before Linux/NFS equivalents. Several features (e.g., Access-based Enumeration, Non-browsable shares, SMB Continuous Availability, integration with Windows Server domain controllers) are described primarily in Windows terms, and references to Windows tools and patterns (such as File Explorer, NTFS, and Active Directory) are common. While Linux/NFS features are present, examples and explanations for Linux are less frequent or less detailed, and Linux tooling is rarely mentioned explicitly. Powershell or Windows-centric configuration patterns are referenced, but Linux CLI or shell examples are missing. Some features (e.g., troubleshooting tools, restore operations) mention Windows workflows or tools without Linux parity.
Recommendations
  • Ensure every Windows/SMB feature description is paired with an equivalent Linux/NFS example or explanation, where applicable.
  • When referencing Windows tools (e.g., File Explorer), also mention Linux alternatives (e.g., Nautilus, CLI commands).
  • Provide Linux-specific configuration and troubleshooting examples (e.g., shell commands, NFS mount options, LDAP integration steps) alongside Powershell or Windows GUI instructions.
  • Highlight Linux/NFS features with equal prominence and detail as Windows/SMB features.
  • Include explicit references to Linux tools and patterns (e.g., mount, chown, ls, systemd, etc.) in relevant sections.
  • Review feature introductions to avoid consistently listing Windows/SMB features before Linux/NFS features; alternate order or present both together.
  • Add troubleshooting guidance for Linux environments, not just Windows/Active Directory scenarios.
  • Where features are Windows-only, clearly state Linux/NFS limitations or alternatives.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/use-dfs-n-and-dfs-root-consolidation-with-azure-netapp-files.md ...s-n-and-dfs-root-consolidation-with-azure-netapp-files.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2026-01-08 00:53
Reviewed by: LLM Analysis
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Powershell Heavy 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation is heavily Windows-centric, focusing exclusively on Windows Server DFS Namespaces, Windows AD, Windows DNS, and PowerShell/GUI instructions. There are no Linux or cross-platform examples, nor any mention of Linux tools or approaches for namespace virtualization or SMB share management. All procedures, screenshots, and code samples are for Windows environments.
Recommendations
  • Add a section explaining DFS-N limitations and alternatives for Linux environments, such as autofs, NFS referrals, or Samba DFS support.
  • Provide guidance for Linux clients accessing DFS-N namespaces, including any required configuration or caveats.
  • Include examples for managing SMB shares and namespace virtualization from Linux, using Samba or other open-source tools.
  • Clarify that DFS-N is a Windows-specific technology and suggest cross-platform strategies for organizations with mixed environments.
  • If possible, reference Azure NetApp Files documentation for NFS and Linux-based access patterns, and link to relevant guides.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-government.md ...b/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-government.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-09-02 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing detailed PowerShell instructions and commands for connecting to Azure Government, while omitting equivalent Linux/Unix shell or scripting examples. The CLI section is present and cross-platform, but PowerShell is highlighted with multiple connection types and commands, and there are no Bash or Linux-specific instructions. The 'Next steps' section also points to PowerShell-specific resources. There is no mention of Linux tools, nor are Linux/Unix patterns or examples provided alongside or before Windows/PowerShell ones.
Recommendations
  • Add Bash or Linux shell examples for connecting to Azure Government and using Azure NetApp Files, especially in sections where PowerShell commands are provided.
  • Include explicit notes or sections for Linux/macOS users, clarifying any differences or additional steps required.
  • Balance the prominence of PowerShell and Windows tools by providing parallel instructions for cross-platform tools (e.g., Azure CLI, REST API via curl, or SDK usage in Python).
  • In the 'Next steps' section, include links to Linux- or cross-platform-focused resources, not just PowerShell.
  • Where possible, present cross-platform or Linux examples before or alongside Windows/PowerShell examples to avoid the perception of Windows-first bias.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-create-volumes-smb.md ...-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-create-volumes-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-09-02 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Windows-based instructions and tools for managing SMB volume access and permissions. All examples and management steps reference Windows interfaces (MMC, Control Panel, Windows SMB client), with no mention of Linux or cross-platform alternatives for accessing or managing SMB shares. There are no Linux command-line examples or references to Linux SMB clients (such as smbclient or mount.cifs), and the documentation assumes a Windows administrative environment.
Recommendations
  • Include instructions and examples for accessing and managing SMB volumes from Linux clients, such as using smbclient, mount.cifs, or GNOME/KDE file managers.
  • Provide Linux command-line examples for mounting SMB shares and setting permissions (where possible, e.g., using setfacl or mount options).
  • Mention cross-platform SMB management tools and clarify which features are available or limited on non-Windows clients.
  • Reorganize sections to present both Windows and Linux management options in parallel, rather than focusing exclusively on Windows.
  • Add troubleshooting tips for common Linux SMB client issues (e.g., authentication, permissions, mount options).
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-government.md ...b/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-government.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-09-01 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing detailed PowerShell instructions and command tables, while omitting equivalent Linux/bash examples. The PowerShell section is more extensive and explicit, and there are no references to Linux-native tools or shell environments. The Azure CLI section is present but minimal, and there are no examples or guidance for Linux-specific workflows or tools. The documentation assumes familiarity with Windows-centric tools and patterns, potentially disadvantaging Linux users.
Recommendations
  • Add explicit Linux/bash examples for connecting to Azure Government, including shell commands and environment variable settings.
  • Provide parity in step-by-step instructions for both PowerShell (Windows) and bash (Linux/macOS) environments.
  • Include references to Linux-native tools (e.g., curl, jq) for REST API access and scripting.
  • Ensure that Azure CLI examples are as detailed as PowerShell examples, including authentication and environment configuration steps.
  • Reorganize sections so that CLI/bash and PowerShell instructions are presented with equal prominence, or alternate which comes first.
  • Add a note clarifying cross-platform compatibility and any OS-specific considerations.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-cool-access.md ...main/articles/azure-netapp-files/manage-cool-access.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-09-01 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Powershell Heavy Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by providing only Azure PowerShell examples for feature registration, mentioning PowerShell commands before Azure CLI alternatives, and omitting explicit Linux/bash command-line examples. The UI instructions also use Windows-centric terminology (e.g., 'right-click'), and there are no screenshots or walkthroughs for Linux or cross-platform CLI usage.
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit Azure CLI (bash) examples alongside PowerShell for all registration and configuration steps, including full command syntax and expected output.
  • Present Azure CLI examples before or alongside PowerShell to avoid Windows-first ordering.
  • Include notes or sections clarifying that all operations can be performed from Linux/macOS environments using Azure CLI.
  • Replace or supplement 'right-click' UI instructions with cross-platform alternatives (e.g., 'select the options menu' or 'open the context menu'), and clarify that the Azure Portal is web-based and OS-agnostic.
  • Add screenshots or walkthroughs demonstrating CLI usage from Linux/macOS terminals.
  • Where relevant, mention any OS-specific considerations or parity between Windows and Linux management tools.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-create-volumes-smb.md ...-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-create-volumes-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-09-01 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 4 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools Powershell Heavy
Summary
The documentation page for creating an SMB volume in Azure NetApp Files demonstrates a Windows-centric bias. All examples and instructions for managing SMB permissions and shares are exclusively presented using Windows tools (MMC, Windows SMB client), with no mention of Linux or cross-platform alternatives. The workflow assumes the use of Windows environments and omits guidance for Linux users who may need to access or manage SMB shares.
Recommendations
  • Include examples and instructions for accessing and managing SMB shares from Linux clients (e.g., using smbclient, mount.cifs, or Linux file managers).
  • Provide guidance on setting SMB permissions from Linux systems, such as using setfacl or smbclient's 'chmod' and 'chown' commands where applicable.
  • Mention and document cross-platform tools and approaches for SMB management, ensuring parity for Linux and macOS users.
  • Rephrase sections that refer to 'Windows SMB client' or 'Windows File Browser' to include Linux and macOS equivalents, or clarify that the instructions are specific to Windows and provide links to Linux/macOS documentation.
  • Add troubleshooting and best practices for Linux SMB clients, including known compatibility notes and mount options.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-mount-unmount-volumes-for-virtual-machines.md ...etapp-files-mount-unmount-volumes-for-virtual-machines.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-09-01 00:00
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation provides mounting instructions for both Linux and Windows clients, but there are subtle biases. The Windows section is presented after the Linux section, but the Windows mounting example references a prerequisite step that must be performed on a Unix/Linux VM (chmod), which may not be intuitive for Windows-only administrators. The Windows example references the Windows 'Mount' command but does not provide a PowerShell example or alternative. The Linux section is more detailed and includes explicit mount command examples, while the Windows section is less comprehensive and omits troubleshooting or advanced options. There is also a lack of parity in the depth of guidance for each platform.
Recommendations
  • Provide a more detailed Windows mounting section, including troubleshooting tips and advanced mount options similar to the Linux section.
  • Offer PowerShell examples for Windows users, not just the legacy 'Mount' command.
  • Clarify the cross-platform prerequisite (chmod on Linux/Unix) for Windows administrators, and suggest alternatives if the user does not have access to a Linux VM.
  • Ensure that both Linux and Windows sections include comparable detail, including fstab (Linux) and persistent mount (Windows) instructions.
  • Consider reordering or clearly separating platform-specific instructions to avoid confusion and ensure parity.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-create-volumes-smb.md ...-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-create-volumes-smb.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-08-29 00:01
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First Missing Linux Example 🔧 Windows Tools
Summary
The documentation page demonstrates a Windows bias by exclusively providing instructions and examples for managing SMB permissions and shares using Windows tools (MMC, Windows SMB client), without mentioning or providing equivalent Linux methods. The only client-side instructions for access control and share management are Windows-specific, and there are no Linux or cross-platform alternatives or examples. Additionally, Windows terminology and tools are referenced first and exclusively.
Recommendations
  • Add instructions for managing SMB permissions and shares from Linux clients, such as using the 'smbclient' or 'smbcacls' tools.
  • Include examples of mounting and accessing SMB shares from Linux systems, referencing relevant commands (e.g., 'mount -t cifs', 'smbclient').
  • Provide guidance on setting file and share permissions from non-Windows environments, or clarify any limitations.
  • Ensure that references to client-side management tools include both Windows and Linux options, or explicitly state if certain operations are only possible from Windows.
  • Where screenshots or step-by-step instructions are given for Windows, consider adding parallel Linux examples or links to relevant Linux documentation.
GitHub Create Pull Request
Azure Netapp Files https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/azure-netapp-files/application-volume-group-considerations.md ...etapp-files/application-volume-group-considerations.md
High Priority View Details →
Scanned: 2025-08-29 00:01
Reviewed by: Unknown
Issues: 3 bias types
Detected Bias Types
Windows First 🔧 Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias primarily through the exclusive use of Windows-specific links and terminology. For example, the link to 'Create a PPG using the Azure portal' points to a Windows-specific path (/azure/virtual-machines/windows/proximity-placement-groups-portal), with no mention of Linux equivalents. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or references, and the documentation does not clarify whether the described procedures or tools are equally applicable to Linux-based SAP HANA deployments. This may lead Linux users to feel unsupported or uncertain about parity.
Recommendations
  • Provide parallel links and instructions for both Windows and Linux environments, especially for tasks like creating proximity placement groups (PPGs). For example, include a link to /azure/virtual-machines/linux/proximity-placement-groups-portal alongside the Windows link.
  • Explicitly state when procedures are OS-agnostic or, if there are differences, provide clear Linux-specific guidance.
  • Include Linux-based terminology and examples where relevant (e.g., referencing Linux VMs, Linux command-line tools, or SAP HANA on Linux best practices).
  • Review all cross-references and ensure that Linux users are not directed only to Windows-centric documentation.
  • Add a section or note clarifying support and best practices for SAP HANA deployments on Linux, which is the most common OS for SAP HANA.
GitHub Create Pull Request
← Previous Page 13 of 36 Next →