100
Total Pages
89
Linux-Friendly Pages
11
Pages with Bias
11.0%
Bias Rate

Bias Trend Over Time

Pages with Bias Issues (16)

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references the Azure portal, a Microsoft-centric (and thus Windows-associated) tool, without mentioning or providing alternatives for Linux users or command-line options. There are no examples or instructions for Linux environments or cross-platform command-line tools.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions for using cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI or PowerShell Core (which runs on Linux) to accomplish the same task.
  • Provide examples or references for Linux users, such as how to perform the operation from a Linux environment.
  • Clarify whether the Azure portal steps are platform-agnostic (i.e., accessible from any web browser), and if so, explicitly state this to reassure non-Windows users.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation does not provide any platform-specific examples or instructions, but it also does not mention or illustrate Linux tools, commands, or workflows. This omission may lead to a lack of clarity for Linux users if platform-specific steps are required.
Recommendations:
  • If there are platform-specific steps, provide examples for both Windows (e.g., PowerShell, Command Prompt) and Linux (e.g., Bash).
  • Explicitly state if the instructions are platform-agnostic.
  • Include screenshots or command-line snippets for both Windows and Linux environments if applicable.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides generic installation and uninstallation steps without specifying any platform, but it uses terms like 'Install Extension' and 'Uninstall Extension' that are more commonly associated with Windows GUIs. There are no command-line examples or references to Linux-specific tools or procedures, and no mention of Linux package managers or shell commands.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit Linux installation and uninstallation instructions, including command-line examples (e.g., using apt, yum, or shell scripts).
  • Clarify whether the steps apply to both Windows and Linux, or provide separate sections for each platform.
  • Include screenshots or command snippets for Linux environments to ensure parity.
  • Avoid using GUI-centric terminology unless it applies equally to Linux desktop environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides only GUI-based instructions without mentioning command-line alternatives. There is no reference to platform-specific tools, but the lack of CLI examples (such as Bash or PowerShell) may disadvantage Linux users who often prefer or require command-line instructions.
Recommendations:
  • Add command-line instructions for deleting the resource using both PowerShell (for Windows users) and Bash/CLI (for Linux/macOS users).
  • Explicitly mention cross-platform tools such as Azure CLI and provide examples for each supported OS.
  • Clarify whether the GUI instructions apply equally to all platforms or if there are platform-specific differences.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias, particularly in the section about monitoring App Services with the New Relic agent. It explicitly states that App Service extensions are only supported for Windows, and App Services running on Linux are not displayed or supported. There are no Linux-specific instructions, examples, or parity in tooling or guidance for Linux-based environments. The documentation also omits any mention of Linux command-line tools or patterns, and the only supported scenario for App Services is Windows.
Recommendations:
  • Provide clear guidance and examples for monitoring Linux-based App Services, or explicitly state the roadmap or alternatives for Linux users.
  • If Linux support is not available, add a prominent note at the top of the relevant sections to inform users early.
  • Include parity in documentation for Linux environments wherever possible, such as instructions for installing the New Relic agent on Linux VMs or App Services.
  • Mention and link to any CLI or scripting options (e.g., Azure CLI, Bash) for Linux users, not just portal-based workflows.
  • If certain features are Windows-only, offer alternative monitoring approaches for Linux users or direct them to relevant resources.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation provides generic installation and uninstallation steps without specifying any platform-specific commands or tools. However, it lacks any mention of Linux-specific instructions, tools, or examples, and does not clarify whether the process is the same on both Windows and Linux. This omission can be considered a bias by exclusion, as Linux users may be left uncertain about the applicability of the steps.
Recommendations:
  • Explicitly state whether the instructions apply to both Windows and Linux platforms.
  • If the process differs on Linux, provide separate, clear instructions or examples for Linux systems.
  • Include references to Linux tools or commands (e.g., using terminal commands, package managers) if applicable.
  • Clarify any platform-specific behaviors, such as how services are restarted on Linux versus Windows.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation does not provide any platform-specific examples, but it also omits any mention of Linux or cross-platform considerations. There is no evidence of explicit Windows bias, but the absence of Linux examples or references could be improved for parity.
Recommendations:
  • Add explicit examples or notes for both Windows and Linux environments if platform-specific steps exist.
  • Clarify if the instructions are platform-agnostic, or provide links to platform-specific guidance.
  • Ensure that future documentation includes Linux and macOS considerations where relevant.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation is heavily focused on the Azure portal and does not mention or provide examples for Linux or cross-platform command-line tools. All instructions assume use of the Azure web interface, which is most commonly accessed from Windows environments, and there is no mention of Linux-specific workflows, CLI tools, or parity for non-Windows users.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions for submitting support requests using the Azure CLI, which is cross-platform and commonly used on Linux.
  • Mention and provide examples for accessing Confluent Cloud support from Linux environments or via terminal-based workflows.
  • Clarify that the Azure portal can be accessed from any OS, and provide links or notes for Linux users where appropriate.
  • If relevant, add troubleshooting or support contact steps that can be performed from Linux command line or scripts.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation is heavily oriented around the Azure portal GUI, which is primarily accessed via web browsers on any OS, but the context and all screenshots are from the Azure portal, a Microsoft product. There are no references to command-line tools, scripts, or automation methods (such as Azure CLI, Bash, or PowerShell), nor are there any Linux-specific instructions or examples. The documentation implicitly assumes use of the Azure portal, which is most closely associated with Windows environments, and does not mention or provide parity for Linux-native workflows or tools.
Recommendations:
  • Add instructions for managing Confluent Access Management using Azure CLI, including Bash and PowerShell examples where applicable.
  • Provide explicit guidance for Linux users, such as how to perform these tasks from a Linux environment or using cross-platform tools.
  • Include screenshots or terminal output from Linux environments to demonstrate parity.
  • Mention any differences or prerequisites for Linux users (e.g., required packages, browser compatibility, etc.).
  • If possible, provide API or automation options for managing users and permissions, with examples for both Windows and Linux command-line environments.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation assumes use of the Azure portal web interface, which is platform-neutral, but the workflow and terminology (e.g., 'search bar', 'All resources') are reminiscent of Windows-centric UI patterns. There are no examples or instructions for performing the same tasks using Linux-friendly tools such as the Azure CLI or Bash scripts, nor is there mention of command-line alternatives.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions for accessing and managing resources using the Azure CLI, with example commands.
  • Include Bash shell examples for Linux users.
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal is accessible from any operating system and provide links to cross-platform tools.
  • Consider rephrasing UI instructions to be less reminiscent of Windows-specific patterns.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows First Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation exclusively describes how to link to an Azure Native Dynatrace Service resource using the Azure portal, with all instructions and screenshots based on the Azure web UI. There are no command-line examples (such as Azure CLI, PowerShell, or Bash), and no mention of Linux or cross-platform automation methods. The focus on the Azure portal implicitly favors Windows users, as it is the default experience for many Windows-centric organizations, and omits guidance for users who prefer or require command-line or Linux-based workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Add equivalent instructions for performing the linking process using the Azure CLI (az), which is cross-platform and widely used on Linux and macOS.
  • If PowerShell examples are added in the future, ensure that Azure CLI or Bash examples are provided alongside them.
  • Explicitly mention that the Azure portal is accessible from any OS, but provide links or references to command-line alternatives for users who prefer automation or non-GUI workflows.
  • Include a section or appendix with sample scripts for Linux users to automate the resource linking process.
  • Review all screenshots and instructions to ensure they do not assume a Windows environment (e.g., avoid showing Windows-specific UI elements or terminology).

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation does not provide any platform-specific examples, but it also does not mention or address Linux or cross-platform considerations. There is an implicit bias in that it assumes a GUI/portal interface, which is more commonly associated with Windows environments, and does not provide command-line or Linux-specific instructions.
Recommendations:
  • Add instructions for changing the billing plan using command-line tools such as Azure CLI, which are cross-platform.
  • Explicitly mention if the portal is accessible from all operating systems, or provide alternative instructions for Linux users if there are differences.
  • Include screenshots or examples that show the process on both Windows and Linux (if applicable), or clarify that the process is the same regardless of OS.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation provides only GUI-based instructions, which are typically associated with Windows environments, and does not mention or provide examples for command-line deletion methods common on Linux (such as using Azure CLI or Bash). There is no mention of Linux tools or workflows.
Recommendations:
  • Include equivalent command-line instructions using Azure CLI or Bash that can be run on Linux and macOS.
  • Explicitly mention that the GUI instructions apply to all platforms if that is the case, or clarify platform-specific differences.
  • Provide screenshots or step-by-step guides for both Windows and Linux environments if the process differs.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example
Summary:
The documentation references Microsoft Entra ID, a Microsoft-specific tool, and does not provide any Linux-specific instructions or cross-platform alternatives. There are no examples or guidance for users on Linux or non-Windows platforms.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions or notes for enabling single sign-on using non-Microsoft identity providers or tools commonly used on Linux.
  • Provide command-line or configuration examples relevant to Linux environments, such as using SSSD, PAM, or other open-source authentication mechanisms.
  • Clarify whether the process is platform-agnostic or provide equivalent steps for Linux-based systems if applicable.

Page-Level Analysis

Windows Tools Missing Linux Example Windows First
Summary:
The documentation exclusively references Microsoft Entra ID and the Azure portal, both of which are Microsoft-centric tools. There are no examples or instructions for Linux users or for using cross-platform or open-source tools. The workflow assumes use of the Azure portal UI, which is typically accessed via a web browser but is closely associated with Windows environments. No alternative methods (such as CLI or Linux-native tools) are mentioned.
Recommendations:
  • Include instructions for using the Azure CLI or Microsoft Graph API, which are cross-platform and can be used from Linux systems.
  • Provide examples or notes for Linux users, such as how to access the Azure portal from non-Windows environments.
  • Mention open-source or cross-platform identity providers or tools, if applicable, to broaden the scope beyond Microsoft-specific solutions.
  • Clearly state that the Azure portal is web-based and accessible from any OS, to avoid the impression of Windows exclusivity.

Page-Level Analysis

Missing Linux Example Windows First Windows Tools
Summary:
The documentation demonstrates a Windows bias, particularly in the App Services monitoring section, where only Windows-based App Services are supported and documented. App Services running on Linux are explicitly excluded, and there are no instructions or examples for Linux-based environments. The documentation also references App Service extensions, which are a Windows-specific pattern, and does not provide parity for Linux users.
Recommendations:
  • Add support and documentation for monitoring App Services running on Linux, or clearly indicate roadmap/timeline if not yet available.
  • Provide equivalent instructions and examples for Linux-based virtual machines and App Services where possible.
  • If certain features are Windows-only, offer alternative monitoring approaches for Linux users (e.g., manual agent installation, custom scripts) and document these alternatives.
  • Ensure that all sections referencing Windows tools or patterns (such as App Service extensions) also mention Linux equivalents or workarounds.
  • Include explicit examples and screenshots for both Windows and Linux environments to ensure parity and inclusivity.